Garcia is a complete fool, drug addict all his life and obsessed with the real criminal mind of Katie. He pull the trigger out of a complete surreal of drugs and alcohol for days ,just to pleased Katie. 👎👎👎👎
You shouldn't continue to focus on the guys that did the murder, as they outright admitted it. They did it as a favor for Katie, and to make $$$.And the Adelsons followed thru by giving Katie the $$ that was promised for the murder of Dan. End of story.
Tina I found myself distracted by the shortness of his jacket sleeve and stopped listening so in fairness I disqualified myself from judging his performance or your comment.
Andrew Barnett Look here, I’m not interested in anything you have to say, and if you’re such an expert on giving closing arguments in court cases, then let’s see you mate. Farcical comes to mind !
You know it's bad when an attorney says "shadow of doubt in his closing" It's beyond a reasonable doubt not shadow! Defense attorney's facial actions and turning his back to the judge while the judge was explaining hearsay was disrespectful and unprofessional which in itself should have resulted in the judge sending the jury out and admonishing that attorney. A horrible attorney he is.
Way too short Mariann. Great observation. I don’t think Colombo or Quincy would have picked that up. It doesn’t appear to have found favour with Tina though.
@@infinitya6873 The prosecutor won--The defense's client went to prison for shooting Dan Markel in the head! I think that is the final result that matters: Prison for life! The defense attorney had an amusing personality, though. He did lighten the mood in the court. Sometimes that is worth something. I hope he spills out whatever he knows about the real evil in this case: Wendi Adelson. We would be very thankful. In hopes, he is doing well.
This lawyer may have done a great job but from day 1 Katie lied to him & this continued throughout the trial. Sifredo Garcia gave this lawyer nothing to work with, he should have just had a public defender. Why pay a lawyer & give him nothing to work with. Looking forward to Charlie's trial.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Not a fan of this lawyer but he did a much better job than the prosecutor and her all over the place closing. Once again the judge shows his bias, completely inappropriate to admonish the lawyer during his closing. The instructions clearly state that the opening and closing arguments are not facts. Garcia obviously guilty but still is entitled to a fair trial
Right? I was shocked by that. The attorney's face while the judge is speaking omg. Technically the judge is allowed to do pretty much whatever he wants, but interrupting closing arguments is still super uncommon....
@@mfirko Mentally impaired judge plays micro-dictator! They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
"Its a crime... he's not gonna ride with a gun." Um, last time I checked so was murder, robbery and selling drugs... I think the gun charge is the least of his concerns.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
I'm feeling inadequate.. There are so many negative comments about this closing and the atorney..What am I not seeing? With what he had to work with, I feel his performance was certainly in the wrelm of the of the standar of representation.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
@@richardpoplis6777 why do you say that? they just got a conviction on Kattie, that makes 3 down and at least 2 to go and Charlie is sitting in jail now waiting for his trial. BTW I'm speaking in general of the overall prosecution team, not just this closing argument. Everything as of May 2022
@@mystique4eva990 3 people maybe 4 had the motive and money to buy this hit.... Wendi.... Donna... Charlie and the father... all hated the ex husband... and had the motive for a hit on him. . The state should not be satisfied untill all 4 are in jail....too
I disagree. The defense closing argument proved nothing. It was rambling and went on and on about the Prosecutors not doing a proper and objective investigation. It was a bad closing. The jury saw through it and handed down the right verdict, in my opinion.
Well, he tried. Unfortunately, there is video of Sigfredo in the Prius and his name was on the rental agreement. There is no connection between Rivera and Charlie directly, and there’s no connection between Rrivera and Katie directly except that one time Katie called Rivera’s phone looking for Sigfredo.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Your comment doesn't say anything about who could have shot Markel, and who got full payment for it as agreed, and whose gun was used. We only have Rivera's testimony who had struck a bargain with the court system, and according to that deal, anything Rivera said had to be taken as fact, no matter the lack of evidence to support his narrative.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Fairs fair. His client is obviously guilty his job is to raise reasonable doubt. There were questions to answer. If his contention is that Rivera brought Garcia along for a drug deal could have some legs when they just find some random person to get drugs and miraculously bump into him on the 2nd trip. And this random person books a hotel room. I am not a fan and wasn't overly impressed with him throughout the trial but he did his job for the closing. The judge was inappropriate how he admonished him in front of the jury, particularly as he was so adamant lawyers not do speaking objections throughout.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
I never heard this closing before. Just found out that ticket given to Luis, indicated that there was no passenger in the car. So gfeiedo was not there.
The common sense here is this: the Adelsons had a problem they felt there would be no legal solution to; luckily for them Charlie was dating a woman who had a baby daddy who was himself in the life of crime and who had friends who were even more in it; that baby daddy was Garcia; he was not the type he could do murder, though, so he reached out to his friend who knew had done it before -- Rivera; he was the tough one; Garcia brought him along to do the shooting; it was Garcia's job but Rivera did the actual killing. The end. All this nonsense spewed by the Garcia defense about this being a one-man job is garbage. Yes, it could have been done by one highly skilled assassin. These guys arent skilled assassins, though. They are hoodlums from the 'hood. Doing it together gave them confidence and made for a fun road trip. Rivera likely did get the gun in his hood. Surely, it would have been safer to buy it in Talahassee and dump it there but it also would have been a whole lot less convenient because Rivera would be off of his "turf" that would make things more complicated.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
This is a Pathetic example of our justice system! Give a murder 1 guilty person a basic 'walk in the park' 6 yr sentence and bring only 2 of a possible 6 people and try to 'fry' them with murder 1 charges. Sadly it happens all the time. If I'm ever on the jury of a murder trial where the prosecution gave one party a 'deal' I refuse to convict anyone else because the whole thing is a sham!!
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
27:07 FALSE: FARGO had 2 dudes on The Job. Breaking Bad had those 2 Brothers that would SHOW UP. Those 2 SHOWED UP in Better Call Saul, too. In the movie Michael Clayton, there was a Hit Team of 2 Dudes.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
The jury believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so. So, who is the sucker? The brainwashed jury!
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
17:49 This is true: When I watched the trial, I was Like: “NO WAY NO WAY NO WAY. There is NO WAY they coincidentally bumped into them and Flagged him down in July, after seeing him in June. There is absolutely no way.”
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement for the murder fee, which he admitted. But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
There is a possibility they were set up to get the blame for the murder by ??? This could have been a drive up to do a drug deal done previously in that garage. But this last time whoever shot Dan knowing they were going to show up there. This attorney makes some valid points about how ridiculous this murder plan was ... Then renting a room in your name and pulling into a driveway, daytime...
This guy risked his freedom/life to do a favor for a man that was sleeping with his girl . Unbelievable 😩😩😩😩
The alcohol makes you think crazy
Not convinced at the time he knew it was for Charlie. I think Katie told him it was for Wendy
Is it a favor if you get paid? I think he thought it was for Wendi.
Garcia is a complete fool, drug addict all his life and obsessed with the real criminal mind of Katie. He pull the trigger out of a complete surreal of drugs and alcohol for days ,just to pleased Katie. 👎👎👎👎
It may be that Katie never told sg that Charlie and Wendi markel were related
You shouldn't continue to focus on the guys that did the murder, as they outright admitted it. They did it as a favor for Katie, and to make $$$.And the Adelsons followed thru by giving Katie the $$ that was promised for the murder of Dan. End of story.
Mr Drama, also Mr Ineffective
This lawyer is a joke.... He should instructed his client to rat out on the Aldelsons. But thought he was smart enough to go to trial and get off free
You don’t what he advised his client .. what a ridiculous ignorant observation
I agree
You sir want to be a King!!!
You’re making no sense, and the judge embarrassed you
This guy is the worst attorney I've ever heard/seen.
Robert Detore Lets see you do better then mate. No? I thought NOT !!!!!!!!!!🙄
Tina I found myself distracted by the shortness of his jacket sleeve and stopped listening so in fairness I disqualified myself from judging his performance or your comment.
Andrew Barnett Look here, I’m not interested in anything you have to say, and if you’re such an expert on giving closing arguments in court cases, then let’s see you mate. Farcical comes to mind !
Tina good burn😏
You know it's bad when an attorney says "shadow of doubt in his closing" It's beyond a reasonable doubt not shadow! Defense attorney's facial actions and turning his back to the judge while the judge was explaining hearsay was disrespectful and unprofessional which in itself should have resulted in the judge sending the jury out and admonishing that attorney. A horrible attorney he is.
The arms on his suit jacket are way to short..🤫🤫
Stupid comment !🙄
Way too short Mariann. Great observation. I don’t think Colombo or Quincy would have picked that up. It doesn’t appear to have found favour with Tina though.
Andrew Barnett Look mate, I’m not interested in you and the other person’s ridiculous observation. Personally, I think he looks Gorgeous !
Apologies Tina mate. I can see in hindsight the comments were off topic and foolish. Appreciate your feedback
Andrew Barnett Go away you ludicrous man, and you can take your sarcastic remark with you mate ! 🙄
I sure hope that was his rough draft of his closing and not the final version.
🤭🤭this lawyer is a bum , I think I could of did way better then this …
@@wavylos9029 too Funny!
🤣🤣
He didn't have much to work with as his client obviously guilty.....but he presented much better than the prosecutor who had a much better case
@@infinitya6873 The prosecutor won--The defense's client went to prison for shooting Dan Markel in the head! I think that is the final result that matters: Prison for life! The defense attorney had an amusing personality, though. He did lighten the mood in the court. Sometimes that is worth something. I hope he spills out whatever he knows about the real evil in this case: Wendi Adelson. We would be very thankful. In hopes, he is doing well.
This lawyer may have done a great job but from day 1 Katie lied to him & this continued throughout the trial. Sifredo Garcia gave this lawyer nothing to work with, he should have just had a public defender. Why pay a lawyer & give him nothing to work with. Looking forward to Charlie's trial.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
A yt comment that aged well for a change 😂
Not a fan of this lawyer but he did a much better job than the prosecutor and her all over the place closing. Once again the judge shows his bias, completely inappropriate to admonish the lawyer during his closing. The instructions clearly state that the opening and closing arguments are not facts. Garcia obviously guilty but still is entitled to a fair trial
Right? I was shocked by that. The attorney's face while the judge is speaking omg.
Technically the judge is allowed to do pretty much whatever he wants, but interrupting closing arguments is still super uncommon....
When the mormon criminals leave more trails of evidence than Lewis and Clark your closing must be all over the place. Georgia we love you.
@@mfirko Mentally impaired judge plays micro-dictator!
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
@@AdamGoNoles "mormon"?
@@internetcensure5849 think Vallow and Daybell trial
"Its a crime... he's not gonna ride with a gun." Um, last time I checked so was murder, robbery and selling drugs... I think the gun charge is the least of his concerns.
He’s trying to create a false narrative right from his imagination
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
I'm feeling inadequate.. There are so many negative comments about this closing and the atorney..What am I not seeing?
With what he had to work with, I feel his performance was certainly in the wrelm of the of the standar of representation.
This lawyer is so boring.
He looks like a crook lawyer .
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
This dudes face tells it all! 🙄
I can't believe this guy went to the University of Miami Law School
Where did you obtain your GED?
@@CIGLLC at your mother’s house.
😂 at both
Garcia ask his attorney not to implied Katie 👎👎👎👎what a fool he is. thats what happened when you choose a bad ,criminal like Katie.
Kept it real!
THIS us what a closing argument should sound like: prepared, concise and entertaining. Unfortunately for him, his client was guilty as sin.
he will rot in jail. disgusting human being
@@MyKakasa the exwife and brother needs to share a jail cell together.... the state once again did a horrible job. Once again
@@richardpoplis6777 why do you say that? they just got a conviction on Kattie, that makes 3 down and at least 2 to go and Charlie is sitting in jail now waiting for his trial. BTW I'm speaking in general of the overall prosecution team, not just this closing argument. Everything as of May 2022
@@mystique4eva990 3 people maybe 4 had the motive and money to buy this hit.... Wendi.... Donna... Charlie and the father... all hated the ex husband... and had the motive for a hit on him. . The state should not be satisfied untill all 4 are in jail....too
I disagree. The defense closing argument proved nothing. It was rambling and went on and on about the Prosecutors not doing a proper and objective investigation. It was a bad closing. The jury saw through it and handed down the right verdict, in my opinion.
Trying to remove Gracia from the trip and murder was a little bit too rich. His attack on Rivera is not unusual. That was defence lawyering 101.
Well, he tried. Unfortunately, there is video of Sigfredo in the Prius and his name was on the rental agreement. There is no connection between Rivera and Charlie directly, and there’s no connection between Rrivera and Katie directly except that one time Katie called Rivera’s phone looking for Sigfredo.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Your comment doesn't say anything about who could have shot Markel, and who got full payment for it as agreed, and whose gun was used.
We only have Rivera's testimony who had struck a bargain with the court system, and according to that deal, anything Rivera said had to be taken as fact, no matter the lack of evidence to support his narrative.
Garcia should have testified if he wasn’t the shooter 🙄
But, he was the shooter ...
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
His lawyer sucked.
Why didn’t sigfredo Garcia testify
This attorney is one of the worst I have ever seen!!
Him and Katie’s lawyer Tara Kawass
Speaking of the worst I should have remembered her!!! She was a mess!!
@@Fera_Hei Yes!!! Terrible !
@@Fera_Hei - He's horrible and said "Shadow" of a doubt in his closing which is not the law.
Hah! "Control alt delete".
All of this attorneys movie references are annoying af
Is he a Public Defender?
Private retained attorney google it
Garcia had a second phone
No wonder he got convicted, terrible lawyer. Tried to confuse the witnesses but he wasnt good at it. But he didnt have much to work with.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
His client was clearly guilty plus the defense attorney was rude, unprofessional and HORRIBLE!
He said he got the ammunition the. Next day?? Not 2 in the morning
You should not be an attorney!! Your terrible!!
Fairs fair. His client is obviously guilty his job is to raise reasonable doubt. There were questions to answer. If his contention is that Rivera brought Garcia along for a drug deal could have some legs when they just find some random person to get drugs and miraculously bump into him on the 2nd trip. And this random person books a hotel room. I am not a fan and wasn't overly impressed with him throughout the trial but he did his job for the closing. The judge was inappropriate how he admonished him in front of the jury, particularly as he was so adamant lawyers not do speaking objections throughout.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
I want to live in the Seigfredo Garcia house. That would be terrific.
I never heard this closing before. Just found out that ticket given to Luis, indicated that there was no passenger in the car. So gfeiedo was not there.
The common sense here is this: the Adelsons had a problem they felt there would be no legal solution to; luckily for them Charlie was dating a woman who had a baby daddy who was himself in the life of crime and who had friends who were even more in it; that baby daddy was Garcia; he was not the type he could do murder, though, so he reached out to his friend who knew had done it before -- Rivera; he was the tough one; Garcia brought him along to do the shooting; it was Garcia's job but Rivera did the actual killing. The end. All this nonsense spewed by the Garcia defense about this being a one-man job is garbage. Yes, it could have been done by one highly skilled assassin. These guys arent skilled assassins, though. They are hoodlums from the 'hood. Doing it together gave them confidence and made for a fun road trip. Rivera likely did get the gun in his hood. Surely, it would have been safer to buy it in Talahassee and dump it there but it also would have been a whole lot less convenient because Rivera would be off of his "turf" that would make things more complicated.
How do you know it was Rivera who did it? Did Garcia say that?
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
What a pathetic word-salad attempt to defend the indefensible. You have to feel sorry for the defence here. It's almost embarrassing.
You are terrible!! You owe your client a refund coming up with a fairytale like this!!
This is a Pathetic example of our justice system! Give a murder 1 guilty person a basic 'walk in the park' 6 yr sentence and bring only 2 of a possible 6 people and try to 'fry' them with murder 1 charges. Sadly it happens all the time. If I'm ever on the jury of a murder trial where the prosecution gave one party a 'deal' I refuse to convict anyone else because the whole thing is a sham!!
Yes, the credibility of such witness is zero and if the case is purely based on that, I would vote not guilty aswell.
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
27:07 FALSE: FARGO had 2 dudes on The Job. Breaking Bad had those 2 Brothers that would SHOW UP. Those 2 SHOWED UP in Better Call Saul, too. In the movie Michael Clayton, there was a Hit Team of 2 Dudes.
Sam Zangeah seems infatuated with Carlie Adelson. Only was good about him his interview after Sickfredo's sentencing.
The only thing not mentioned was the grassy knoll
He's awful
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decided that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
This defense lawyer is a bad joke..got is law degree through the mail
Garcia attorney is complete out , needs change his profession ASAP. 👎👎👎👎👎
That attorney reminds me of Scarfaces corney buddy
A good looking mafia don.
Don’t you feel like a foolish that the jury did not believe your fairytales?
The jury believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
So, who is the sucker? The brainwashed jury!
I 💯 % believe Wendi was the master mind and riviera was the shooter!
attorney
Excellent closing arguments, from a wonderful defence lawyer !!!!!!!!!!!
El Chingon I wondered when an idiot like you would notice lol 😂 just for you mate !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Language Lab Thank you ☺️and yes I do agree !!
Haha ! You a relative?
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement of the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Defense attorney closing was HORRIBLE!
Typo....of the standard of representation
17:49 This is true: When I watched the trial, I was Like: “NO WAY NO WAY NO WAY. There is NO WAY they coincidentally bumped into them and Flagged him down in July, after seeing him in June. There is absolutely no way.”
I absolutely believe that is how it happened. I
They believed what the hoodlum Rivera said following a deal with the corrupt US court system, called "bargain plea". But material evidence points to him, regarding who pulled the trigger. RIvera's gun was used in the murder, and he received full payement for the murder fee, which he admitted.
But the corrupt court system decisded that it's Garcia who killed Markel, because Riviera said so.
Rivera ain’t no head of a gang either, please
Latin King Lawyer
There is a possibility they were set up to get the blame for the murder by ??? This could have been a drive up to do a drug deal done previously in that garage. But this last time whoever shot Dan knowing they were going to show up there. This attorney makes some valid points about how ridiculous this murder plan was ... Then renting a room in your name and pulling into a driveway, daytime...
The defense attorney made zero valid points. He's horrible.