South African Reacts: The United States (USA) vs The World - Who Would Win? Military/Army Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 лют 2024
- Join me as I offer my live reaction to AMERICA VS THE WORLD
The original video: • The United States (USA...
If you enjoyed the video, please consider subscribing to the channel. I am uploading similar video to this every day :)
Thank you for watching !!
This video is underselling the US Navy. We don't have 11 supercarriers, we have 11 supercarrier strike groups. These have multiple support ships - destroyers, cruisers, frigates, submarines - and those ships are well prepared to protect the carrier from any threat -- land, sea, or air. And that's in the event of a surprise attack. If we sent these ships knowingly into war, they would be far more defended.
Whenever I see a video about how X number of countries could combine to defeat the US, I always take it with the pinch of salt that is "oh, most of them are our allies, and even if they suddenly weren't, all of them would have to surprise attack us at the same time for it to be a fair fight."
actually tyhat video is underselling the laws of physics.
any object can only be at one place at any specific moment in time.
and thus in a war of you against the world, you lose.
the video goes around this by making it a 1vs 1 tournament instead of 1 vs the entire world.
A Nimitz class carrier carries 70 aircraft in peacetime. During war it can carry 100 aircraft of all types.
Don''t forget the newer Gerald R Ford class currently being built and launched.
Another interesting reality is that the largest Navy in the world is the United States Navy and the second largest Navy in the world is our Fleet of Museum ships😂
China's not AS advanced as we think/ they say they are. They routinely prove that. But you can't underestimate anyone, plus...you can always get lucky and unlucky.
their technology is also sub par. and their armies not as trained. a US Marine is probably equal to 50-100 chinese soldiers.
@@Krobra91I've always said, they have more PERSONNELin Costumes...we have more SOLIERS....and Russia has more alcoholics, Drug Addicts and murderers!
America is Untouchable!🤣😂💙👍
You can say that again!!!
20:40 I think the reason why he gave the 30 days timeframe is because collectively the U.S. was able to completely breakdown and defeat both Iraq and Afghanistan within that timeframe of those two wars.
Both those counties were crippled and their governments were over thrown or destroyed by that 30 day mark. So in theory the U.S. track record of breaking through somewhere around that timeframe. Then of course the U.S. occupied those counties for like 20 years before we recently pulled out of them.
I'll explain it the US is 247 years old as of 2024 and has been not at War for a total of 15 years CUMULATIVE
America will be 248 in 2024 and we haven't been to war in only 4 years not 15 years Afghanistan war lasted for 19 years and 10 months it started in 2001 after the 911 attack on America
France has the only Super Carrier, Britain's two carriers are escort class. A Nimitz or Ford Class has a normal compliment of 70 with a mission specific 92 aircraft capable, but can hold a maximum of around 130 in case a Carrier is sunk and its aircraft need somewhere to land if a land based airport is not possible.
Keep in mind...a Super Carrier has to be Nuclear powered to make it a "blue water" ship.
I wanna let you know during wartime the carrier's can carry up to 90 aircraft. That's only some during wartime
My guess as to why the video was saying that 30 day blockade on China is based on two theories. First, China will be expending quite a lot of its initial resources to combat the blockade. This will require them to use most of the fuel they already have and dip into its own strategic reserves to fuel their missiles, transports, and military operations to keep the US from initiating the blockade. The second theory I have is kind of similiar, but will have to do with the oil blockade in the Middle East, combined with the degradation of their military space assets, as they will be high value targets for the US, and due to the fact that they (China) only has limited numbers of the space assets they can task on target within a 24 hour period. China's doctrine would likely be to hit hard and fast, to keep the blockade from being enacted to begin with. This will cause them to use a vast amount of fuel, and they will have to then decide whether to task their assets to help dislodge the US from the Middle East, or continue using their fuel reserves for missile bombardment and to attack the US submarines and ships that are off their coast. What is not discussed in the video is how the Russians, Indians, and the European coalition would take that decision from China, as it would require the use of so much oil (fuel). I'm not sure the "coalition allies" in this scenario would be on board with China expending so much fuel in what amounts to a two-front war for them (their coast) and to assist dislodging the Americans in the Middle East. This would come at the cost of other coalition forces being able to have adequate oil for their operations and for their economies. China's problem isn't so much their technology. Look at their J-20 and you'll see its spies basically delivered specs of the F-35 and the Eurofighter 2000, as the J-20 is a combination of both these designs. Their aircraft carriers are a combination of the older Russian design, the Nimitz class and the amphibious/transport carriers of the US. China's largest problem is production in enough quantities with the advanced technology. Yes, their technology is approaching some of the more advanced US technology, but they can't produce it in enough quantities yet to matter. It's why we don't see 4 or 5 advanced aircraft carriers, despite the fact this is an older video. Plus, the increased production of this type of advanced system(s) would show up on classified satellite images, which I can pretty much guarantee the US analysts can see and would be tracking. They (China) just can't produce enough advanced technology weapons platforms fast enough (right now) for this type of a scenario to matter, at least as it is discussed in this video. That could change, but it is still something being tracked and probably accounts for war preparation plans the US would be considering. Incidentally, the F-15 also has been able to launch a missile and shoot down a satellite, and I think it is the only aircraft that has been able to do that, so that's another feather in the cap of that plane. The new EX variant I am sure can be equipped with antisatellite weapons, along with nuclear weapons, should the specific mission call for it. The US is already well into research and development of advanced directed energy weapons production and already have prototypes that have been tested on multiple naval vessels. There is footage of the tests you can watch. It is one reason you haven't seen the US being overly concerned about the maneuverable hypersonic missile hype. Laser weapons fire very near the speed of light and can defeat hypersonic missiles if they can be spotted.
America love you my friend
This strategy is effective what the houthis are trying to do right now. Disrupt global trade and commercial ships repeatedly, and you can already see most ships are starting to go around Africa, its only a matter of time before costs start trickling up. And America is in a tough position because while it's a major problem for global trade, like he states it's more important for our allies that oil stays stable, and not exactly for ourselves.
It’s The Biden administration not really tough position Trump would of stop that shit so quick
that strategy works for them because it's only whites trying to stop them.
if it was the whole world(we support palestine, so we arent), then it wouldnt work.
if you tried that against the rest of the world you would lose some of those fancy carriers of yours......
the video only works because they are dishonest.
they arent depicting a war between you and the rest of the world.
they are depicting a series of 1 vs 1 wars between you and a few countries.
in a 1 vs 1 war you would definitely defeat anyone.......but you against the world is won by the world.
@@jeremylee9145 Not really, Trump would either throw US allies under the bus or appease dictatorships, very similar to how he performed during his first term in office.
@jeremylee9145 that is such of a dangerous statement and your disregard of human life is scary lol
Thankyou the us is is a instrument of peace
This is just the active navy, and air crafts, if this was to actually happen the US would pull ships from the bone yards, speed up ship building, commotion more ships built, and bring out retired aircraft
The submarines alone could wipe out most other countries navies. Each Virginia class, of which there are 23, have around 65 torpedos/missiles and each Ohio class, of which there are 18, can have at least 20 missiles. Also 4 of those Ohios have been refitted to hold 154 missiles each. Some quick maths adds up to a minimum of 2387 booms that only 2 classes of subs can cause. That's just counting 41/64 active nuclear powered US subs.
Just try and compare the state of the world now versus how the world was without the US to stabilize things. No UN.. as ineffective international law is now… it was practically non existent before. Today’s conflicts would barely make the news compared to the complete destruction of wars in previous eras
the world was better off without you stealing our wealth.
Get US out of the UN!
@@antiglobaljoel532
the un would be a much better place without you.
The US has 20 aircraft carriers not and then you can add in the Marines amphibious strike ships which is an essence of small aircraft carrier and then we have to ask how many did the United States have in dry dock which I would guess we could probably double those numbers I can only guess because there's a lack of information on how many the United States has in dry dock
All countries are going to do a lot of secretive military work
of course this video was done before our withdrawl from afganistan
This video is a couple of years old so it doesn't really apply anymore
Wrong lol
when the rest of the world looks at our defense spending being more than twice that of the next closest country and laugh "what are you even doing with that much money?" well, now you know.
How's the homelessness and fentanyl crisis going in USA these days?
that video is wrong.
those ships need a logistics chain to be able to project that military power outside of your territory.
in the case of a war between you and the rest of the world, the very first thing to go is 100% of your military bases on other countries.
and with them your logistics chain.
also you have a finite number of ships. and each ship, as per the laws of physics, can only be at one place at any specific moment in time.
so where would you send them?
would you try to invade a single country and overpower them in the hope that nobody helps them?
would you try to be everywhere?
Almost 85% of china's automobile industry had to file bankruptcy because their electric cars was catching fire. this is the same China who has never made a reliable telivision but they somehow have great military equipment with advanced technology😂
They would never reach land but I would pity them if they did as there are 120 guns in America for every 100 citizens😂
Meanwhile the yanks have run out of ammunition 🤣
Wake up because it won't happen kid, not even in your dreams. Like what happened in World War II, the US's sheer economic and industrial might is the key to victory. In times of total war, all US industries and factories will be shifted to war footing, which means that even a small toy manufacturer could become a weapon factory.
We gave it over to Ukraine because it was decades old stock. We just now gave another 60 billion to our defense and weapons manufacturers to make brand new for us.😂
This video seems to forget the US can’t have its subs and carriers in 3 places at once! Let’s not forget the US population of 350 million vs rest of the world’s population of 7.5 billion.
In reality the US would be heavily preoccupied by holding down central and South America, and couldn’t touch east Asia when accounting for all countries there working together, not just China.
It’s safe to say the US would inflict heavy damage on the world’s economy, but would not last too long after a year or two of recession caused by removing imports whatsoever.
no, Great Britain has no super carriers. They have 2 non-nuclear carriers that can only host Short take off/vertically landing aircraft. Those aircraft are inferior in range and weapons payload to the airplanes carried on US Super Carriers. The US has 9 carriers that are like Britain's carrying only short take off/vertical landing aircraft.
the world is a very big place.
in such a war the first thing to go away would be your military bases in other countries.
so without that logistics chain to support your carriers, where would you place them?
let's say you have 20 carriers.
how would you use them AGAINST THE ENTIRE WORLD?
would you leave some near your shores for defense?
would you bunch them all together to try to invade china? russia?
would you try to spare one for the persian gulf? or what exactly would be your strategy to take on THE ENTIRE WORLD?
300 million vs 8k million......
i think this video is dishonest....as it shows every single country having just a 1vs 1 war against you.....
detail which military bases would go away how. Then we'll tackle the next thing. I imagine you know squat about Mil Sea lift @sabin97 @@sabin97
As I thought, you don't have a clue@@sabin97
which bases? How? Elaborate or it makes no sense as the US has plenty of bases worldwide that it cannot be kicked out of. PLENTY to support a world wide navy.@@sabin97
dont let that video fool you.
it's doesnt describe a war between usakistan and the rest of the world combined. but a series of 1 vs 1 matches.
if it was areal war of usakistan vs the world it had two possibilities. either it starts suddenly. or there is a period of preparation.
if there's preparation then usakistan would abandon all its military bases on earth. and lose its logistics chain which enables it to project so much military power everywhere.
if it's sudden then the local military of each country would easily overpower the usakistani military personnel in their bases, and thus all of them would be immediately captured, before their ships and airplanes can get there.
in either case they lose their supply chain.
and it becomes a war of attrition.
all middle eastern countries can effectively defend the oil fields. and russia can send canada some help in the form of s400 systems , to secure their southern border.
and some for mexico to defend their northern border.
usakistan has a finite number of ships. and as per the laws of physics each ship can only be in a single place at any moment in time.
so they need to carefully choose where they want to deploy those ships.
sweden has submarines capable of closing in and sinking a carrier and escaping without being detected.
they would be spreading those subs at most of the key places for those carrier groups.
japan, china, australia and india could form a mighty barrier in the pacific, to keep them out. part of the indian fleet can also help near the persian gulf.
israel has the most modern airplanes usakistan has produced, with their own private software that usakistan cannot disable.
england, france, and spain would be protecting the northern part of the atlantic.
brasil and colombia would be busy protecting the south.
it's a war that usakistan would inevitably lose.
nobody can defeat the entire world.
not even germany could do that.
wrong. Why abandon bases? The key bases needed CANNOT be taken over by any other country
You do realize that the U.S. always puts themselves in the biggest disadvantage possible in training on purpose to make it as difficult as possible for us so that way we are prepared for anything in a real life scenario. We have a saying "Train like you fight, fight like you train" also, it's a good thing to lose. If you don't find your weakness someone else will. That's why we train with allies. I was also in the Army myself, I always had at least one mission I failed in every training scenario because we will always be put through every possible scenario and situation at any time. We don't hold back in training at all, in fact people die in training. Hell, I almost died a few times in training myself. But my mos was a bit more high risk than others. Our military would absolutely demolish the global alliance. After serving I got a more detailed view of what our military is capable of, although I still don't know to what extent. I do know that our military would have absolutely no issue. Numbers mean nothing, no nation can even come close to invading us, no nation can defend against our navy or our air force which are the 2 biggest deciders in a war, which ultimately we will use to shut down all oil production and global trade routes. At that point the U.S. has already won the war. We wouldn't need to do anything else. Everyone else would run out of oil and wouldn't be getting any goods. The U.S. can completely sustain itself since we actually have enough oil and gas reserves to be the 2nd largest producer in the world, despite it saying we're 12th. That's not true. We also supply most the world with food so we could easily keep ourselves fed.
😂I've never seen a comment be more wrong in my life
You obviously know nothing about how war works, so please let the grown ups do the talking. War isn't like CoD. It's much more complex than what you simple minded civilians think it is
That time that Sweden "sunk" our Aircraft carrier was actually just them being able to get near it without being detected. It would take nothing short of a nuke to destroy an aircraft carrier. There's a reason why they have the most advanced radar system in the world, to detect nuclear missiles and shoot them down. Those systems can see everything up to 200 miles away
My opinion is that China is a paper tiger
As scared as you are about what China doesn't tell you about their military, you should feel confident that the US is also not sharing all its capability but on a much larger scale. What the world public thinks they know about the US military is just the tip of a very large iceberg. I heard something recently that perfectly describes US v China militaries... Chinese military is like a pond that's 1 mile wide and 1 inch deep. The US military is a pond that's 1 mile wide, and 10 miles deep.