South African Reacts to: US enemies are not gonna like this video...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
- Join me as I offer my live reaction to why US enemies will not like this video!!!
The original video: • US enemies are not gon...
If you enjoyed the video, please consider subscribing to the channel. I am uploading similar video to this every day :)
Thank you for watching !!
On Americans who have guns, they didn't show 120 million. It showed 120 guns per 100 population. So the guns in civilian hands outnumber the civilians themselves.
...and that's just the ones they know about. There's millions they don't know about.
@@91GT347 I read a report saying the FBI estimated US civilians may have as many as 600 plus million guns. Many of which are not registered as they were passed down through the generations.
The F-22 has dual engines and two ducted exhaust ports. The F-35 is a single engine with only one exhaust port. The US sells the F-35 JSF to other countries but we passed a law and, quite literally, made it illegal to sell a F-22 Raptor to anyone.
Only reason F35 is sold internationally is due to being JSAF and designed with a few other countries, wish we could get F22 in UK but we are quite tied with the states politically.. I would imagine the US rotates different fighters in their UK based airfields
@@jim9930They actually have built more than 1,000 F-35s at this point
Even if the south is "open", that desert will put up a lethal fight without lifting a finger, hell, I don't even know which season it's deadlieat, summer: too hot, winter: too cold, fall and spring: snakes, scorpions, gilas, coyotes, mountain lions, Apaches, cactus, terrain... Skinwalkers...
True!! Difficult conditions to deal with for sure
Remember independence from Britain was fought by citizens. The Army was the British Red coats. Farmers and other citizens had weapons they used for hunting and were able to beat the British. And that was then....
"The will to fight"
no.
your independence from the other english(you are still english) was not fought by citizens.
it was literally fought and won by france, spain, india(yes, india) and netherlands.
that's why england only sent a few troops to their colonies.....they had an actual war to fight.
it's sad that they dont teach you world history, american history or even usakistani history.
all they teach you is an extremely romanticized version of usakistani history....so romanticized that it's closer to fan fiction than to actual history.
if not for the actual war, england would have easily crushed the little "rebellion" of the slaver washington.
@@sabin97 Take a Midol and lay down
@@sabin97 Possibly the most delusional post I've seen today, which is surprising considering we're on UA-cam.
@@nerofl89
knowing history isnt delusional.
thinking your rich slaver founders somehow defeated the most powerful military on earth is delusional.
but your people are not known for their intellectual prowess.
America just opened an antimony mine. Canada has several, as well.
An interesting side note is that the "military spending" that is often referred to actually includes things other than the military. It is where pretty much all bureaucratic agencies get their funding from (think three letter agencies and more); and this spending also includes private sector payments for research and developments as well (reminder this includes R&D that is not military oriented). The overall military funding is only a smaller portion of the "military spending" often touted, though it is still considerably higher than the next few nations.
Also there’s almost a million armed police officers in the US that would add to the armed and trained personnel.
Just cauase the antimony mine closed doesnt mean its empty. More just saving for a rainy day
@10:32 Civilians have an estimated 400+ million guns, not a 120m.
true that MERICA
Americans own approximately 450,000,000 privately owned Firearms
More guns than people!
Imagine if a good leader would use this to help the world instead of destroying it ... wonder who our leaders really are cause no human can do war and live as nothing happens
Yea. Very sad. Seems like the leaders in charge simply seek power
Talking about resources, the state of Wyoming has more cows than people.
They don't need to invade if they are already inside
As someone who grew up and lived out in the country their whole life; I can confirm that some people who live out in the country like me (like my friends), are waiting for an enemy to invade. I've heard some say to let them try.
your military would easily defeat any invading army.
however if your military(and all their equipment and other miltiary assets) was to magically disappear(yeah, this is completely hypothetical because it will never happen), then any competent military would easily invade you if no other country interferes.
because civilian grade toys are no match for military equipment.
for example russia would conquer you in a few years.
it would take years because the territory you occupy is IMMENSE.....and tanks can only move so fast.why would first take alaska, for obvious reasons.
from there they would go to washington and capture a coastal town and start building military bases for their supply chain. clearing out areas and importing russian civilians to populate them and keep them productive. then they would keep spreading south and east. always leaving behind a small force of defenders with sniper rifles and such, so if any armed civilians try anything funny they would be hitting the floor immediately.
@@sabin97 "for example russia would conquer you in a few years." LMAO stupid statement of the century..how has that worked out in Ukraine??
@@DarkSim77
do you have some sort of mental disability?
some condition that prevents you from understanding what you read?
did you not read? or what exactly?
i used simple words in my previous post.
and you either didnt read them, or didnt understand them.
i will copy-paste the first part.
please acknowledge that you understood it:
"your military would easily defeat any invading army."
did you understand that part?
that's sadly not a rhetorical question.
@@sabin97 More pointless blibber blabber..You are the one that implied that without their military the US would be conquered "in a few years." A lot of the Ukraine army are civilians dumbass and they've beat big bad Russia's ass for 2 years straight..Ukraine might as well have marched there women up to the front.. Again I ask the question: Years later, How has invading the Ukraine worked out for Russia?
@@sabin97 You implied that Russia could conquer the US if the US military was to disappear because the civilans could do nothing. The Ukraine military is made up of civilians dumbass and how has trying to take over little old Ukraine worked out for big bad Russia..its been years and Russia has taken a ass beating from a inferior force. Ukraine might as well have marched there women up to the front lines..
America has more privately owned firearms than the rest of the world combined. A militia of 150 million with more than 350 million weapons. Many of us grew up shooting. My first rifle was my 20th birthday present.
I can’t imagine how much more USA would be producing now with how the increase was during WWII
Everybody talks about our military. Yes, we spend a great deal on our military. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. If you want to really understand the whole reason we are so strong I'd suggest you watch...how geography made the US so OP. Don't remember who put it out but it covers a lot of things about the US that most don't think about. Its a long video but has a lot of info.
Then maybe the video..... The USA vs the world.....😮
Thanks!! I’ve recently reacted to a USA vs the World video. Was great :)
Our armed citizens would most certainly step up! This is our country and we will defend it from both foreign and domestic threats. Unfortunately lately it seems the threats are from within just as much from foreign threats. I’m confident that our country won’t be this divided for long but even so if an outside threat occurs we will unite in the blink of an eye. It’s like a sibling thing- we can mess with each other but will never allow anyone else to mess with us. No matter what is going on in my country I’m still extremely proud to be American. We may not always be happy with our government but we love our country and it’s ours not anyone else’s.
The budget has been that way since ww2.
No, those are F-35s
Awesome, thanks for the clarification 🙌🏼
No.... this is Patrick
1:49 Those are F-35s.
Thank you! :)
In the 80s the USAF already showed it can shoot down satellites and in the 2000s the USN did the same thing.
F35s.
Thank you!
Russia is ahead of the USA
Thanks for the laugh :)
That's funny ask Japan what happened when they touches our boats. And that was just a couple boats.
russia has 1 aircraft carrier that doesn't leave port, we have 11
Russia is getting its ass beat by little Ukraine..
we dont hate the video.
we are already more than aware that the geography makes it impossible to invade.
in fact they could cut their war(they call it "defense", but not once have they used it for defense, always for invading others) spending by over 90% and still would be impossible to invade, even for russia and china combined without anyone else intervening.
it's a sad fact of life that the tyrant has the most expensive military. that's how they have stolen so much wealth from america, africa and the middle east.
@@jim9930
"You would be speaking Japanese or German"
not really. i would still be speaking spanish.
neither germany nor japan would be able to win ww2 if you ddint exist. germany desperately needed russian oil. and operation red beard was doomed to failure from the start. it might have taken a few more weeks, but the end result would have been exactly the same.
also japan wouldnt have been able to expand outside asia, and after the fall of germany, russia would have turned its attention on japan, just like they did in the real timeline.
what you ddi in ww2 was basically swoop in at the last moment, and claim the result was because of you, when it wasnt. also you worship the thugs who dropped nukes on civilian populations and did na-zi style carpet bombing campaigns against civilians.
so yeah it's not "defense". it's brutal and wanton mass murder.
"Also, without the US military, the global food chain would not have been possible."
of course it would be possible.
not just possible, but probably better without anyone having to be subject to your tyranny.
"Literally there are only two self sufficient continents on the planet; North America, India"
neither of those is a continent, or self-sufficient.
i suspect you might be yet another victim of the usakistani education system.
when you start to talk about yahweh sabaoth as if it were history, and defending the idea of a "chosen race" i jsut had to stop. it's disgusting and factually incorrect.
@@sabin97 You live in a pipedream bro... Someone is always trying to be number one. Would you rather an authoritarian dictator to control supply chains of everything? It would be much worse in almost every way in terms of corruption, political favoritism, and overall human rights.
I have a mental exercise though, which country of global influence would you pick to control the majority of global economic movements? How would they be better? I'm talking realistically not ideally.
I'm genuinely curious as to what you think 😊
@@alanfernandez854
"You live in a pipedream bro"
which specific thing i said do you think is incorrect? we can start from there.
@@sabin97 Who would be a better alternative as the number one global superpower? Because someone is going to attempt to control global shipping, food chains, and resources. If we didn't control it what we do, either Russia or China would impose their rules and I'd have to say I'd prefer the semblance of democracy vs authoritarian style global order, personally.
@@alanfernandez854
"Who would be a better alternative as the number one global superpower?"
given that usakistan is the worst tyrant in history ANYONE would be a better superpower than them.....that includes germany from ww2...
" If we didn't control it what we do, either Russia or China"
yeah that's like a certain "chosen race" saying "if we didnt steal their land, someone else would".
"prefer the semblance of democracy vs authoritarian style global order, personally."
you dont represent even a semblance of democracy. you impose your tyranny on everyone, even by force.
china does the opposite.
if they want your resources they offer something practical in return, and only go to your country invited. when you want someone's resources you invade and steal those resources.