KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK [15,389 ton] Eve-kebin Shuttle
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- Playlist : • KSP(Kerbal Space Program)
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) [Movie] Online Shopping
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Catapult
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Monorail
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Kerbal Gun
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Tank
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Car loop rotation
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Pirate ship rides
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla [Helicopter] Super Cabra(AH-2Z)
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) Moon landing conspiracy theories
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP(Kerbal Space Program) STOCK/Vanilla Propeller Biplane
• KSP(Kerbal Space Progr...
KSP v 0.24.2.599
Download Craft file : www.mediafire....
The copyright holders of Kerbal Space Program
www.kerbalspac...
This is the reason why saying "it worked in kerbal space program" is banned at NASA
that's actually pretty funny
Too true
Lol
Exactly.
Vastator rly?
No one has yet pointed out the xkcd quote.
The guy who checks the o-rings on all those rockets must have the most stressful job in the world.
This is easily the most Kerbal thing I can imagine - the excess, the inefficiency, the brute force escape from the gravity of a planet...
It's a mess, but it's perfect...
Inifus it’s our mess
12:59 A cool clean 15g deceleration.
Yes indeed
Is that the peterscraps in the comment section down below?
@@fokur9611 it is waow. never thought id find a random peter scraps comment on a video das cool
All this, just so you could teabag Eve ONCE, and then immediately go home.
This is the TRUE Kerbal way!
Thumbs up for overkill!
"Sir our last 11 attempts to reach the planet have failed. What should we do!"
"MORE ROCKETS"
"But sir we've done that 11 times already!"
"Clearly you were not adding MORE ROCKETS!"
thats should be the slogan for ksp MORE ROCKETS :D
That should be the slogan for nasa
PureTomGaming well you clearly haven't seen the steam community for this game :P
i did i have the privilege to have this masterpiece and im loving it xD
Nathan McCauley me playing ksp in a nutshell
It's the guys at the space center I feel sorry for. Imagine having a constant steady stream of huge spent rocket stages falling on your head.
especially now with the destructible buildings.
Returns to Kerbal Space Center only to find the entire peninsula melted to a pool of slag 8 miles in diameter.
where'd everybody go?
+Gamekid !007 Narnia
ROFL
I have a hard enough time trying to match orbits, and this guy just straight shots it from one planet to another in that monstrosity...
Dex vs Str
You'd probably single-handedly win a world war, flying this over the enemy's capital and just ejecting spent rockets from sub-orbit
cw8 THATS ACTUALLY AN AMAZING IDEA XDDDD
@@THECHAIR. ww3
Perfect! But it needs nukes
@@_thisnameistaken each booster with a tiny nuke
@@CarlosAM1 good idea
You didn't establish Kerbin orbit nor did you establish orbit around Eve before attempting to land...
I like your style.
I'm not the only one who does that :D I save fuel usually, since the fuel I would spend on orbital corrections goes towards slowing me down.
I find the most efficient way to go places is to skip stable kerbin orbit. I can to the Mun faster and cheaper just flying straight at it.
the only reason you'd ever want to use orbits in this game is to go to mun, or minimus if you're lazy and don't want to wait for first time alignment. Every time you make an orbit you are wasting fuel for a Vx velocity rather than a Vy velocity to escape kerbins orbital space.
Pavel Ilyukhin That is incorrect. I used to think that flying up straight would save me fuel since I did not have to expend horizontal velocity. But after studying and reading about orbital mechanics, I realized I was wrong. There is this thing in physics called conservation of energy, so when you orbit kerbin and perform a hohmann transfer, the the horizontal velocity you previously expend adds to the velocity of the burn.
Flying straight up is very costly and inefficient. This can be easily demonstrated in the RSS mod: You can perform a normal launch and spend 10km/s worth of delta-v to orbit earth and another 6km/s on a hohmann transfer to successfully reach lunar orbit. However, if you simply point your rocket upwards with 16km/s worth of delta-v, it will only reach a few thousand km, then fall back towards earth.
This is because every second the rocket is pointed upright, it loses approximately 9.8ms^-2 worth of acceleration to earth's gravitational pull, whereas in orbit, you do not have to expend a single drop of fuel to fight against gravity.
The Great of Beam
Well, I dont go straight up, I go at a 45 degree trajectory when the mun is at about 60 degrees and this will bring me straight towards the mun. It may be more efficient too establish orbit, but I find its easier for me this way, and using the exact same rocket to get orbit then transfer out I find I dont make it as far, but I may be doing it incorrectly.
you're the person they warned us about in the math books
Solid Banana So kids, how many kilometers can a spacecraft fly if it looks like an arrow with a giant flat donut wrapped around it and has enough fuel to gas an entire planet?
Frederik Keldmann ~625.96
What about the guy who buys 80 watermelons at the store
500 trillion tons of fuel....
barely makes it
Десь я один руски
@@mrprokker4496 Tbl ZDECb HE ODNH
His spacecraft is a giant parachute
Louis Henn *guy makes it to minmus with 1.3 ton rocket*
@@streetfood7568 its a nuke
"Science isn't about why, it's about why not!"
-Cave Johnson
Hensel and Gretal tactic leave a trail of fueltanks to find the way back home.
You can't argue with a successful results!
only awesomness can come from your designs!!!!!!!!!!!!
I cant believe robbaz commented on a vid and the veiws didnt hit 500000
I remember a whi ago he commented on a volvo racing vid and then it got 2 million
WHAT THE SHIT NIPPLES IS THIS?!
Now here is a man that understands the Kerbal way.
***** yeah!
Guys... Guys. I'm seeing a whole lot of dismissive sneering comments about how in efficient it is, or how it could be done better. And sure, there's a lot to be said about having the understanding and precision of engineering to do something "the right way".
BUT, having the determination and the special blend of madness to do something undeniably the wrong way, *AND THEN SUCCEED ANYWAY*. That, in my eyes deserves genuine respect. It's the Kerbal way. Did no one notice that this thing had 108 stages? Can no one appreciate how he delivered and then launched a craft from Eve, larger and heavier than many that leave Kerbin?
All the elitists here trash talking this and dismissing it for inefficiency, would you still say such a thing if Jebediah was there to hear it? When did you people lose your green googly eyed souls? This is Kerbal art.
Hmmm...
Seems very fuel efficient.
VW could learn from this guy.
Steve Bradford bmw ?
@Kenn Honson no you mean bmw
@Kenn Honson btw .. If you don't get it ... Iam joking as bmw is not fuel efficient .. If you don't get it
I can imagine that at the initial launch of this rocket some poor Kerbal looked up at the sky and said "MY EYES!!!!!"
No, the guy from spongebob did
but they don't speak english for some reason, so they'd say SOJO SIM
@@sossololpipi9633 yup
Screw the guy looking at it the Kerbal in that monstrosity turned to pudding
About 4 minutes of bombing the launch pad... Lmao
+xHasten Made my day :D
how he managed to eject fuel tanks without using a stage mechanics???
+Андрей Мишин maybe a mod?
Li mão é aquela cítrico azedo
*runway
I cringed at the thought of setting up the asparagus staging on this.
throw some asparagus on your computer and boom done
this is like a decade's worth of asparagus.
Houston.. we have a huge fucking problem.
+Anthony Amsden (Pebbles are rocks.)
*We've had
+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer) we've got
+River Buchanan these kids
+Anthony Amsden (Pebbles are rocks.)
"No shit we've got a problem, *WE HAVE SOLID FUEL BOOSTERS RAINING DOWN ON US!!!*"
+Callum Stonehouse i agree that idont e even now how to say but its beautiful
legend says the kerbins are still cleaning up the debris
XD
+Inklord_Farstain that would take 1 century to clean up!
haha
+Inklord_Farstain he wanted to make a trial, to know how to come back home
+EmoGaming32 Lel,Razer
:3
I think i know why fuel prices are rising.
I know! This is like 132 million years worth of fossil fuels.
I don't think that rockets use fossil fuels, I may be wrong though
they use a special mix of cow manure and diesel i should know my dads a rocket scientist
RAFAEL
When the other fuel tanks drop they refuel the others via external ducts.
Travel to Eve or "How to bombard Kerbin while getting to EVE"
How to Kessler syndrome Lel.
Marex333 man
voces são engleis
Loreci Kochem Eu nau
R.I.P. Aerodynamics
Ahahahhahah
litteraly C shape haha the worst shape
how a nation bankrupt within 1 day
Kraftsman Sheng you can't bankrupt what isn't there ;)
TearlessNumber0 is an analogy
TearlessNumber0 I bet that sounded pretty witty in your head, huh? Pretty clever when it was forming in the old noggin?
Kraftsman Sheng how much would that really cost though?
@@AustroStudios2003 couple billions. Many a trillion. Not enough for bankrupt but enouph for a civil war or crappys schoold hospitals military and horrible goverment suppert
"Sir, we've made back from Eve."
"Good, let me see the science report."
"..."
"You didn't...get...a science report!?"
"Sorry sir, it was all very-"
"BUILD IT AGAIN AND GET YOUR ASS BACK THERE!!!"
15389 tons go to Eve. What comes back? about 1.5 ton XD
KERBALS
Max Nuber Newton's third law: if you wanna go places, you gotta leave some shit behind.
Qaoz wait. i gotta take a shit before i go somewhere? that´s why i didnt made it out of bed this morning
Max Nuber The more you know, man.
Sweet lets send the design to NASA
Yes they need to make this.
yes just think about how many random pedestrians we could smash with all that falling rocket parts :)
I know right one small step for mankind one giant leap for that child trying not to get crushed by a falling rocket.
+Pyrite Paladin that comment made me complete
You're welcome, just doing my duty.
still less emissions than a Volkswagen jetta TDI
Guns Of Spuds well technically, rocket fuel can just be a 2:1 ratio of hydrodren to oxygen, which mean all emissions are just water vapor as long as you use liquid fuel. that's what they did with the space shuttle. so yes, the rocket could in fact have better emission ratings than a car
About a year late too.
Relevant XKCD
what-if.xkcd.com/142/
Lundo bruh stfu no one cares
Lundo But this rocket doesn’t use hydrogen
when in doubt, use more rockets...
+Joey Rinaldi (“LegoGamingJoJo”) That's the first kerbal astrodynamics law, explained by Wherner von Kerman himself!
+Joey ‘LegoGamingJoJo’ Rinaldi Adding More Boosters...
lol, with that many rockets one could probably launch into dark space away from the Milky Way...if not rotating around and wasting the precious fuel like demonstrated in this video... instead of gaining speed, and you also probably dont need to turn them on all at once
Moar boosters!
Personally, I don't care if he's inefficient... he can be as silly and epic as he wants. Also, you might notice he's dropping boosters in tune with the song.
when you refuse to take two trips from your car to your house with food
harrison corey took me a minute. Rofl.
People on the surface of Kerbin would be horrified to see rockets from the sky. And that's how WW3 starts.
It's pretty neat to see an actual sea level launch in vanilla for Eve, that's pretty tough.
But... He has parts mods, does that count?
Should it?
Im Not A Cute Fox What mod parts is he using?
MysteriousSteve1234 none
Nvm... I have so many mods I get confused sometimes. Sorry guys!!
I can just imagine the little kerbal boys and girls cowering in fear in their bomb shelters as booster tanks rain hell upon them. "Why mommy, why does the metal rain fall?"
"Because, sweet prince, Jeb wanted to go to Eve today, no tears, be strong for mommy."
6:00
uuuuuhhhhhh...
Oh right, this is pre-1.0 ksp, where Eve's atmosphere doesn't completely obliterate everything xD
2014/2015/2016/2017/2018:
UA-cam: Nope, not recommending this to him.
2019:
UA-cam: *NOW IS THE TIME.*
2020
I wonder how much tax Kerbals have to pay for this
Well, the KSC is the Only city like thing there is on Kerbin
Jurassic Xenomorph What about the desert temple?
Yeah, like people live in the pyramids in real life.
it isnt real life either
Well, I am guessing they wouldn't be able to build this in Campaign mode...
Pretty steady trail of bread crumbs to follow back home. XD
That feeling when you realise he just used ten times more fuel in a single mission than I've used in several months playing KSP... I'd use wings and a nuclear engine on Eve, tho, if I'd ever dare trying to land a kerbal on it.
But he did it the cool way.
Nuclear engines have crap Isp in atmosphere though... and they are heavy and low thrust. Eve has higher gravity too... Nuclear engines are not the way to go. Try either the aerospike or the rockomax radial engines. Rockomax are surprisingly efficient because they weigh almost nothing, giving you massive delta v. aerospike are brilliant in eve's thick atmosphere.
Carbon 12 hm, didn't notice that nuclear engines were bad in atmo, good to know.
TheLaXandro Yes, otherwise all my rockets would launch with a massive amount of nuclear engines- it is still more efficient despite it's massive... well, mass. Rockomax little red radials are the second best though, their raw inefficency is more than made up for by their lack of mass and thrust to weight ratio. So even in atmosphere they do pretty well, depending on your design. Good luck, have fun, and fly safe.
TheLaXandro They are not good inside atm because they are not powerful, inside the atmosphere you want to reach the escape velosity as soon as possible and with nuclear engines it will take quiet some time.
You should feel honored, I paused Scott Manley to watch this. Quite interesting :)
That's tough to do, Scott Manley is one manly scott!
I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist the word play lol!
That good sir is not a shuttle; it's a monstrosity... A wonderful monstrosity but a monstrosity non the less. :D
EDIT: I'm sat here singing "lag lag lag laaaaag lag lag lag lag laaaag lag" in time with the tune.
эй трололо тыгавно
I'm pretty sure the sudden force of all those rockets blasting off at once would turn the pilot into Jell-O. A very green Jell-O.
He didn't accelerate that fast due to the weight of the ship and the multiple stages which were inactivated. I could accelerate faster with a cockpit and a single solid fuel booster.
I could have that for lunch
Wai....wait what's that? I think i hear the CPU crying for help...
what the title should be: How to Kerbal
+Charles Xll Nah, "Tutorial on how to get the lowest possible frame rate"!. Would ruin my old PC.
Back when there was no temperature system... things were so easy.
ifly6 ikr
ifly6 you can still disable it in options. or the alt f12 cheats
This would probably crash my game.
Blood_Dragon Meh.
Blood_Dragon 2spooky4me
+Jamesthe1 {[Minecraft, Music, and more!]} it would crash my game as well and my pc!!!
+Jamesthe1 {[Gaming and Music!]} Probably cause your Minefuck Aspire Netbook Laptop can't run KSP.
Get a job.
K
i think the most impressive part of this is the fuel lines all working properly
Two things;
This ship is the definition of the source of space junk.
I flipped out when I realized the title of the video claimed this was a "shuttle."
What is wrong with that? A shuttle is just a vehicle that is designed to get you from one place to another. But yes, it is most certainly the definition of space junk. ;3
Can't argue with the results
Dat_guy_at_McDonalds I can argue about the results of turning space into a landfill.
HaloFanRedvsBLue12 in a video game...
Wow its a video game and it was fun to watch jesus tits some people will cry about anything.Just enjoy it.
"Great! welcome back. Have the surface sample from Eve?" ,... "Doh!"
Seriously though, that's the biggest, most impressive asparagus stack I've ever seen. Well played sir.
To be honest this method is SOOOOOOOO inefficient XD
I was Able to go to Eve with the Basic Asparagus using the Main Nasa Rocket and 6 Skippers with the top 2 stages made of the Puddle and a basic Nuclear engine. Saved about 1000X the fuel he used. Still You HAVE to addmit its pretty boss xD
I think this is the most efficient you can get honestly...
Unluckydisires The way he did in the vid ? not really You can use two Crafts actually undock land go back up, dock transfer fuel from the lander back into the Nuclear powered craft and you'll get more than enough fuel. Also, He didnt use a launch window in the beggining.
Maciej Kamiński I do that too sometimes. I suppose that is much more efficient. The rocket design itself is the best efficiency you can get...
Unluckydisires But the more Fuel you use to go tu Eve the more fuel you need to get of the earth the more thrust you need and the least efficiency you get. Efficient = Least for More so To prove that I'll make a Video of myself going to Eve and Back apollo style. The MOST efficient way there is to land on a planet and come back.
U make the interplanetary stuff look easy.
Vladimir McMahan If you get MechJeb, you can watch it do the burns and hopefully get a feel for IP. Or, you can try to make a burn to go from the Mun to Minimus or visa versa
ok thanks!
:D
Vladimir McMahan
Another helpful thing:
twitch.tv/dasvaldez
like scott manley but answers questions realtime
Thank you!!!
Vladimir McMahan
No prob. Tell him I sent ya
Jebidiah be like : Needs more fuel tanks...
The entire Kerbin world economy well spent.
One of the sweetest examples of the "Brute Force" approach to the Problem of Eve I've seen yet. Congratulations! :-)
Remember kids, if your rocket doesn't fly, just keep strapping shit to it until it either blows up or works.
Someone gave Wiley Coyote KSP for Christmas.
M1k3y this is my favorite UA-cam comment of all time
Epic! The updated physics engine would probably just blow this up on the launchpad but I love the video 😁
Ridiculously, laughably inefficient. Win
If it was Elon Musk , he would have recovered all the stages :P
meanwhile i cant even get to the mun
I just use hyper edit ;)
+Yodaman598 preach it sister...
+Starlightron Really? For Mun i just get to orbit then wiggle with the blue thing, And sometimes the purple things.
+Starlightron you should send a rescuer then :D
+Yodaman598 The mun? HA! Child's play
Its raining rockets for kerbal space centre :p
One of the less efficient designs I've seen. :/
I know. :3
Just teasing! :D
Keep up the epic builds! :)
+SqueakSquadSgtAkashe Yeah not efficient at all, but still totally AWESOME! Keeping the staging symmetrical would be tricky I suppose.
This rocket brought to you by the Jeremy Clarkson Rocket Design Foundation.
It's not always about efficiency, sometimes you just have to send a message.
the asparagus. its so beautiful. so many stages. so many engines. so much fuel. (its a asparagus stock system btw)
AND later you find out after all that he lands in north korea :D
+Cthulu Kid it was bob, so who cares :/
+noor dhillon Filthy Capitalist amphibian! Rocketing off the backs of hard working scientists!
Ah pre-1.0 KSP, where you could launch a brick into orbit because the aerodynamics calculations were awful, and doing a "gravity turn" meant going straight up for at least 10km and then turning hard to the east..
all the parachutes remind me of the flying house in the disney pixar movie "UP"
A breadcrumb trail of external rocket tanks. :D
so the way i play is correct?
help
if you watch turbo boosted... no
no....
more boosters.
Ah, she's built like a steakhouse but she handles like a bistro
Love the Futurama reference.
Got a contract, if I get to eve and back i get 200k, *uses over 50 bil,*
Awesome flight, great musical accompaniment.....kudos..
frogstamper Agreed!
See if it works now with the aerodynamics changes
+CONELRAD It would have probably exploded on lift off xD But still, this is awesome!
Because *fuck* aerodynamics ...
Pfft, who needs elegant design? Just strap more rockets on top!
How is that not elegant? The power, the grace, the staging!
SirKaldar It's the American way, is it not? If at first you don't succeed, make it bigger!
Kerbal space program Q/A guide: Q/ does it fly? Y/ nice. N/ add more rockets. A/ is it frik'n awsome? Y/ cool. N/ add more rockets. Basically if the awnser is yes that's cool, if it no simply add more rockets.
And Scott Manley did this with a plane.
+Tommetrofan modded.
Mr Penguin ya ok you are right
I mean, that shit had an ISP of several thousands, you can't compare that with the 280-ISP of an aerospike.
Mr Penguin yea you are right
Hearing the music all I could think of was "Kill the wabbit, kill the wabbit!"
Never gets tired of this desing so Kerbal in essense.
and the music really fitting.... I can't but imagine the chaos at KSC.
Jesus tapdancing Christ, I can't imagine having to do the staging for this. Must have took days.
Not even a vegan housewife uses this much asparagus...
I am here in 2021 i remember when i watched this so many years ago... i like this video i dont know why, because music and kerbal nostalgic
Mother of god... And here I've got a group stranded on Eve that's going to be there for eternity...
its a design that makes the rocket more and more fuel efficient as it flies and detatches rockets (takes fuel from outer most rockets first, and drops them when they run out of fuel, keeping maximum weight/thrust ratio).
he's also managed to keep everything pretty stable, there's no torque, so the craft isn't spinning faster and faster (which would spin itself apart eventually).
Lands
Immediately leaves
The asparagus is strong with this one...
so How's the ducktape holding up?
it started with bob and ended as bill
Yeah, I think they edited into orbit once they got the initial liftoff video. If you look at the orbital velocity before it goes to map mode, it is wayy less. Either that or they lost the initial part of the video and recreated it.
lucas gamer extreme
i love how it just keeps getting smaller and smaller
Did you expect it to get bigger or something?
@@Cysfer Well no obviously it was just cool
Open the video.
I Think:Okay,that's kinda a funny video, LOOK HOW FUCKING ROCKETS HE HAVE!!.
The video continuos.
Waiting for somenthing happen.
Eve appears on screen.
I Think:OH MY FUCKING GOD! HE DID IT!!! HE ACTUALLY DID IT!1!1!1!!!
Reach the sea.
I Think:Okay, that was very co- wait! The video isn't on the end? (looking on the bar)
See him turning on the engines.
I Think: No...That's insane...How the fuck he gonna go bac- That's bullshit. Let's see.
He is going back.
Can't believe on what my eyes are seeing.
He came back to Kerbin.
And then feel like really need to put my reaction on the comments.
THE END! TÃ-TÃ!!!
*when the booster layer is wider than the rocket is taller*
Nose cones! Please! my ocd
At those speeds, they would just add mass.
+Marcelo Meireles but less drag!
+Tardi Grade Gaming At lower speeds like that, mass is more concerning.
You !
also this was made 2 years ago when Kerbin's atmosphere was about as thick and dense as a wet paper towel
This is how my friend builds EVERY SINGLE ROCKET. Doesn't matter if he's heading to the Mun or Kerbol, he just keeps adding more and more of the biggest rockets he can until his computer crashes or he gets where he's going lol
I'm not sure what's better...the shuttle itself, the science behind it making a successful trip, or the classical music that goes along with the video
Kill the wabbit, kill the wabbit, kill the waaabbit.
in 0.25 i'm sure that the runway will pop
yup.... even a light rocket breaks the runway... (or launchpad)
Holiday Miner It's all about mass...
more mass = bigger chance that the runway/launchpad will pop
launchpad pop problem can be solved by launch clamps :)
I know... when I say "Light Rocket" I mean like 200tons max
Holiday Miner :P
They should make the launch pad a bit stronger... and the VAB a bit weaker
With that much fuel one could pretty much launch a mission to every single body in the Kerbin system...
Plus some rockets were constantly somehow "refueling themselves" when others ran out of fuel. Probably a bug with that superrocket.
driftacauty That's asparagus staging, every single tank you see is feeding in towards the center rocket, so every single one burns but they all remain at max fuel until the outermost one drops off.
driftacauty When the drop tanks were removed the max capacity was cut off thereby giving the illusion of "refueling" the rockets, as you put it.
driftacauty No, He's using fuel lines for Asparagus staging. Look it up.
@@driftacauty441 No you are just an idiot.
The stages are in an asparagus setup so the outermost tanks in the setup are the only ones that are being used until they drop, then it moves to the next set of tanks. Ksp staging doesn't calculate the fuel correctly though in an asparagus set up but if you right click the tanks you can see that all the tanks are full besides the ones that are in the outermost set.
This is seriously the most impressive thing I have seen done on KSP in my fucking life. I can't believe you used every single rocket and planned it out so perfectly..
I drank a glass of wine, sat back, watched the entire video....
and came wholeheartedly into my pants.
There was never any other choice of song for this flight! Well done my friend
^_^^_^^^^_^€€___^/_%//_&/€5€65/^+^×^×jh^×_^#^ykykg÷_×^##^÷^^#÷^#^÷€&#€×uuuhiiyeyehushsiiwd8eiwiiess€£=£ujhh÷uu÷_=yyi&#iii€€#€÷_÷8÷&=€€÷iuu&¥#*3_€#&£÷¥+#;÷::'hVhywbwgbwsyhwhsgy
The most eco-friendly american's truck be like