AAC Steel-Cased 7.62x39 vs UCW, Barnaul... and Tulammo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @slavicgondola1817
    @slavicgondola1817 Місяць тому

    I appreciate how thorough you where great review man

    • @hobofactory
      @hobofactory  Місяць тому

      Many thanks! If anything I was worried about being too long-winded.

  • @TheTsarsTailor1910
    @TheTsarsTailor1910 2 місяці тому +2

    Love your channel man!

    • @hobofactory
      @hobofactory  2 місяці тому +2

      Much appreciated, thank you watching!

  • @secretagent8126
    @secretagent8126 Місяць тому

    I had similar thoughts. Thanks for conducting an independent analysis.

  • @armstrong2052
    @armstrong2052 2 місяці тому +1

    For velocity 3 is fine. But standard deviation is going to require more rounds for a better number of FPS SD.

    • @hobofactory
      @hobofactory  2 місяці тому +1

      IMO even for velocity, the sample size should still be bigger so what could/would otherwise be an outlier doesn’t mess up the mean.

    • @armstrong2052
      @armstrong2052 2 місяці тому

      @@hobofactory definitely is good knowing if there's an extreme spread at any point. I've found that happens with some cheaper stuff mainly just foreign producers. The cheap stuff here in usa is all good charges consistent primers but seating depth is crazy different from round to round, even neck tension varies.

  • @armstrong2052
    @armstrong2052 2 місяці тому +1

    I'd like to test barrel lengths vs the russains stuff. And reliability in short guns.

    • @hobofactory
      @hobofactory  2 місяці тому +1

      Unfortunately I don’t have much variety in barrel lengths, everything I’ve got is either around 16” or 20”… but I’ve also been curious if the results would be much different with any of the others.