The fact that the Royal Dutch Air Force has chosen the C-390 to replace its current C-130 Hercules fleet is an answer to the question in the title of this video, I guess.
The C-130 still has an advantage in overall range and that it has 4 engines versus 2. Given those facts, the fact that the Netherlands, Hungary, and Austria chose the KC-390 is only a partial answer to the title of this video. Like the video says, it still depends upon the mission requirements to decide which plane is the best! I still congratulate Embraer for a remarkable achievement, though.
But the KC-390 has more range, better fuel economy and is faster. Having fewer engines is better, it means it is more economical in parts, since you have 2 fewer engines to keep adequate with spare parts, not to mention that the fuel would only need to supply 2, not 4 @@citylimits8927
The big move of the KC390 over the C130 is that it uses commercial aviation equipment that has spare parts all over the world! The C130 has technical assistance all over the world, but only with specific and original parts and this causes a lot of problems if these are missing!
The project initiative came from the Brazilian government. They approached Embraer and asked them to build the plane and said, we are paying it! And so they did! Brazil do have several Hercules....It was time.
sim em partes concordo com voce porem tem o c390 é feito com muitas partes sem peso politico qualquer pode comprar e nao precisa de autorizações é mais facil as forças armadas do eua comprar c390 como ja esxitem conversas nnos bastidores@@sonnymagalhaes9203
Could you explain what kind of support Chile and Colombia gave to this project, please? I knew that some components were produced by Argentina, Portugal and Czech Republic.
I can’t see how it would compete with the C17? Not too sure it would replace the C130J as it has proven track record, and many airforces are still acquiring them. Unlike the RAF who got rid of their fleet.
The C 130-J is a good aircraft, but not the best. In addition to its platform being old, it's more expensive, consumes more fuel, has a higher maintenance cost, is slower, noisier, less technological, carries less and smaller loads... Acquiring a C-130 for in-flight refueling requires an aircraft specifically for this role, while the C-390 is modular and simply attaches the kits you want for the different missions.
What a beatifull edition!!! Congrats!! More than Excelent!
Thank you ♥️
The fact that the Royal Dutch Air Force has chosen the C-390 to replace its current C-130 Hercules fleet is an answer to the question in the title of this video, I guess.
Also, Austria and South Korea have chosen C-390.
Frankreich und Deutschland haben sich für die C-130 entschieden.
The C-130 still has an advantage in overall range and that it has 4 engines versus 2. Given those facts, the fact that the Netherlands, Hungary, and Austria chose the KC-390 is only a partial answer to the title of this video. Like the video says, it still depends upon the mission requirements to decide which plane is the best! I still congratulate Embraer for a remarkable achievement, though.
But the KC-390 has more range, better fuel economy and is faster. Having fewer engines is better, it means it is more economical in parts, since you have 2 fewer engines to keep adequate with spare parts, not to mention that the fuel would only need to supply 2, not 4 @@citylimits8927
@@citylimits8927 But the KC-390 has more range and having more engines brings disadvantages
EMBRAER....the BEST OF WORLD
Embraer the best🇧🇷
Amazing aircraft. The best in its category. Excelent video.
O c-390 é belíssimo e eficaz
🇧🇷O KC 390 é simplesmente espetacular!!!
kc 390 é o melhor da sua categoria!
Nah
The big move of the KC390 over the C130 is that it uses commercial aviation equipment that has spare parts all over the world! The C130 has technical assistance all over the world, but only with specific and original parts and this causes a lot of problems if these are missing!
Congratulations on the excellent editing and quality of the information. Hugs from Brazil.
Kc390 The best on his category❤
The best on its category, as every aircraft made by Embraer
C 390/ KC 390 IS THE BEST ONE
The C-130J is already in its obsolescence and many Air Forces are switching to the Airbus A400M and the Embraer C-390 Millennium.
C130j suffers from severe technical problems especially the pressurization system.
This is not true!
C-390..... best in it´s class !!!!
South Korea!!! :)
Embraer is competence and technology
Embraer aviation is getting noticed, and if they can make the price low, they will sell a thousand of these. It is a damn good cargo plane.
Polônia, Coreia do Sul e Índia também querem o Kc-390
11:15 actually the C130J is the same price and has lower cargo capability then the C390 (20ton x 26ton)
c130j is more expensive
Looks like a good plane
Não há concorrência para esse avião no mercado dele
🇧🇷 Simplesmente Espetacular!!
O Hércules já cumpriu sua missão agora sou eu
Belo pássaro!
The project initiative came from the Brazilian government. They approached Embraer and asked them to build the plane and said, we are paying it! And so they did!
Brazil do have several Hercules....It was time.
I Hope They Enlarge The Aircraft And Make C-490
Is the best.
WOW ♥
Are they going to send the C390s to McGuire Air Force Base in NJ?
40 india buying use only bsf
faltou uma info o peso politico americano joga contra o c130j e tambem faltou acrescentar austria e korea do sul que ja compraram mais avioes
O peso político americano (lobby), joga contra o C-390, não?
sim em partes concordo com voce porem tem o c390 é feito com muitas partes sem peso politico qualquer pode comprar e nao precisa de autorizações é mais facil as forças armadas do eua comprar c390 como ja esxitem conversas nnos bastidores@@sonnymagalhaes9203
@everyone
there is news that Boeing took 100 engineers from Embraer
Could you explain what kind of support Chile and Colombia gave to this project, please? I knew that some components were produced by Argentina, Portugal and Czech Republic.
I can’t see how it would compete with the C17? Not too sure it would replace the C130J as it has proven track record, and many airforces are still acquiring them. Unlike the RAF who got rid of their fleet.
.....AND MOST IMPORTANT, LOWER COSTS $$$ !!
Bsf . Ssb itbt use this aircraft
Is this USA bait against BRICS? Nice plane through.
Este avião parece com um gafanhoto!! Recife, Brasil
made in Brazil
One is a known devil while the other is an unknown god. I take the Lockheed.
The change has begun!
What a lot of hype-bs!
I still think the old c-130J SH is better though
And you are?
Nobody in particular. I’m just a c-130J enthusiast
@@frostzerokill2525 "I just like it better because I`m a fan of the old plane and not because it is better!" ==== There I fixed your comment for you.
The C 130-J is a good aircraft, but not the best.
In addition to its platform being old, it's more expensive, consumes more fuel, has a higher maintenance cost, is slower, noisier, less technological, carries less and smaller loads...
Acquiring a C-130 for in-flight refueling requires an aircraft specifically for this role, while the C-390 is modular and simply attaches the kits you want for the different missions.