The NEW Embraer C390 Will DESTROY The Entire Aviation Industry! Here's Why

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 253

  • @JubinUpadhyay-cu2ds
    @JubinUpadhyay-cu2ds 4 місяці тому +114

    India loves Embraer ! ❤ Indian Air Force is happy to use Brazilian aircraft’s ❤

  • @brenocostateixeira
    @brenocostateixeira 4 місяці тому +114

    Santos Dumont was a unique Brazilian. He flew balloons and Zeppelins and created the first self-propelled plane, which managed to fly, with an audience as a witness. At the time, he asked Mr. Cartier himself to make a wristwatch, as this would help a lot on his flights. There are also exclusive Cartier watches, from the Santos-Dumont series. And he was the one who created the famous Brazilian, which scares foreigners, our ELECTRIC SHOWER hahahahaahh

    • @Marcelo1945able
      @Marcelo1945able 4 місяці тому +6

      É verdade, você lembrou desse detalhe que pouca gente cita, o relógio de pulso da Cartier. Grande inventor Santos Dumont.

    • @dobbleGbr
      @dobbleGbr 4 місяці тому +3

      ele era o senhor dos ares, digníssimo santos

    • @agbottan
      @agbottan 3 місяці тому

      I'm getting baths from the electrical shower for 45 years and never died.
      (Got some minor electrical shocks, but nothing above the expected)

  • @edirib2004
    @edirib2004 4 місяці тому +39

    The jump of development that Embraer experienced in less than 20 years is terrific!

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera 4 місяці тому +1

      Privatizing a company does wonders. It became private 30 years ago and was listed 24, this made a HUGE governance difference.

    • @aryborel9740
      @aryborel9740 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@gustavobuquera😂😂😂😂😂

    • @aryborel9740
      @aryborel9740 3 місяці тому +1

      Acho que vc não conhece a história da companhia! 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @seuvagem1950
      @seuvagem1950 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@gustavobuquera😂😂😂😂 antes a Embraer fabricava aviaozinho de papel, né? Kkkkkk A Embraer é gigante há muito tempo!! O desempenho atual de deve a encomenda e financiamento ESTATAL para os seus projetos!!

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera 3 місяці тому

      @@seuvagem1950 antes ela dava prejuízo e só servia como cabide de emprego politico. Era uma bosta msm cm rios de dinheiro do povo sendo jogado nela.

  • @sonnymagalhaes9203
    @sonnymagalhaes9203 5 місяців тому +124

    It's hilarious to see how Lockheed Martin uses the C-130's inferiority by saying that it's exactly what customers prefer...
    The Kawazaki is really very good, however, it is bigger, heavier, requires more runway for landings and take-offs, does not have the same adaptability, in addition to being infinitely more expensive, both in terms of price and operation and maintenance. Arguably, the C-390 is an incredible aircraft and the best in its class. Congrats for your video.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 4 місяці тому

      You forget
      Lockheed is major company and there is no doubt they can deliver on time
      Embraer is not

    • @sonnymagalhaes9203
      @sonnymagalhaes9203 4 місяці тому +7

      @@verdebusterAP What nonsense are you saying, brother...
      Firstly, there is not a single case of late deliveries by EMBRAER. I challenge you to come up with just one.
      Furthermore, it would be good for you to be aware of current news that shows significant delivery delays from both Airbus and Boing. This would avoid the embarrassment of issuing erroneous data.
      Furthermore... whether or not the C-130Js are delivered on time doesn't change the fact that they will continue to be inferior and more expensive, so i don't understand what the purpose of your message was.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 4 місяці тому

      @@sonnymagalhaes9203
      Lets add some reality to that shall we
      First Embraer is use building commercial aircraft which are quick and easy to make. Military grade aircraft are not
      The Brazilian Air Force ordered 28 in 2014 and its first flight was 2015 yet its 2024 and they only have 6 planes
      Lockheed C-130J are considerable larger yet they are delivered in fraction of the time
      Inferior , ha
      mean the C-130J superior
      Lets see the C-390 pull the C-130J weight
      oh wait it cant
      C-130J comes AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO
      The C-390 only matches the KC and thats it

    • @sonnymagalhaes9203
      @sonnymagalhaes9203 4 місяці тому +2

      @@verdebusterAP Well my friend, apparently you also have to find out about State acquisition processes. It's not like going to the corner and buying an object off the shelf...
      Let's go: As you know (or at least you should know), the C-390 Millenium is a new aircraft starting from scratch, using new concepts and innovative technologies. This requires specifications of what is desired for the aircraft, design, consultation, price survey, approvals, prototype manufacturing, testing and much more. I can already say that the entire process took place within the expected schedule (no delays). Due to the pandemic occurring around the world, the FAB's military budget underwent changes, which forced it and EMBRAER to renegotiate the contracts (which was accepted by EMBRAER, without making things difficult for the FAB). There were changes in the number of aircraft required and the deadline for delivering them. (If you are interested, take a look at the subject).
      "(...) The Lockheed C-130J are considerably larger..."
      Bro, at least read the aircraft's technical sheet before saying something...
      The C-390 does EVERYTHING the C-190 does, but BETTER and FASTER. (He just doesn't land on aircraft carriers for obvious reasons...)
      -A small detail that you may also be unaware of: The C-130J actually also has the KC version, but what you didn't say is that the C-130J requires a "specific" aircraft for this role, while the C -390 Millenium, just put the refueling kit in flight... that is, if you need a freighter and an aerial refueler, you will have to buy 2 C-130J or just 1 C-390 Millenium with the 2 kits.
      And finally, what expertise or authority do you have to say what EMBRAER knows or doesn't do? Saying something like that is completely nonsense.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 4 місяці тому

      @@sonnymagalhaes9203
      More excuses I see
      Again lets add reality
      The state acquisition processes has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. What Embraer hoped for is a massive influx of orders
      yet after ten years on the market, they only sit at 45 orders and of that 45, only 17 from outside the country so like Dassault did with the Rafale, they quietly renegotiated the contract with the Brazilian Air Force to stretch out deliveries over a longer period in hopes of making more orders.The C-390 hasnt gotten any serious orders
      2-4 planes per order at most while the C-130J averages between 10-12 planes per ordeer
      No the C-390 does nothing like the C-130J can
      I dont see any AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO variants of the C-390 do we
      -A small detail that you may also be unaware of: The C-130J actually also has the KC version,
      So you cant read as I clearly wrote AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO
      The C-390 has the KC variant but none of the other variants

  • @ThalineDaniele
    @ThalineDaniele 5 місяців тому +104

    O melhor Avião do mundo na sua categoria, estou me formando no ITA para entrar na Embraer.

  • @Hellgazer
    @Hellgazer 5 місяців тому +188

    Brazil invented the airplane, and we build aircrafts for a long time.

    • @karlosgomes1419
      @karlosgomes1419 5 місяців тому

      😂😂😂

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer 5 місяців тому +12

      @@karlosgomes1419 why you laughing?

    • @igorluiz9551
      @igorluiz9551 5 місяців тому +2

      @@Hellgazer because we didn't lol

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer 5 місяців тому +41

      @@igorluiz9551 have you ever heard of Santos Dumont, who flew over Paris 3 years before the Wrights brothers?

    • @brenocostateixeira
      @brenocostateixeira 4 місяці тому +30

      @@Hellgazer Santos Dumont was a unique Brazilian. He flew balloons and Zeppelins and created the first self-propelled plane, which managed to fly, with an audience as a witness. At the time, he asked Mr. Cartier himself to make a wristwatch, as this would help a lot on his flights. There are also exclusive Cartier watches, from the Santos-Dumont series. And he was the one who created the famous Brazilian, which scares foreigners, our ELECTRIC SHOWER hahahahaahh

  • @pedrovcvc
    @pedrovcvc 5 місяців тому +31

    I see one of those almost every week, flying above my home! Fast and beautiful

  • @CarlosMagno8888
    @CarlosMagno8888 2 місяці тому +2

    Embraer is great!

  • @scientech7906
    @scientech7906 5 місяців тому +26

    The best medium freighter in the world.

  • @clebertonalves2161
    @clebertonalves2161 5 місяців тому +28

    🇧🇷O KC 390 é simplesmente espetacular

  • @MariahGessinger
    @MariahGessinger 4 місяці тому +9

    Santos Dumot está Feliz! O Brasil inventou o avião e agora reinventa a avião militar de carga 👏🏼

  • @ulissesferreira5892
    @ulissesferreira5892 5 місяців тому +60

    Embraer ❤ Rolex off aircraft

  • @YlmazDALKIRANscallion
    @YlmazDALKIRANscallion 4 місяці тому +23

    I hope Turkish Army buy these aircrafts in the future instead of C-130.

  • @bernhardjordan9200
    @bernhardjordan9200 3 місяці тому +3

    During the pandemic it airlifted pure oxygen to Manaus, it was an heroic mission

  • @cupofjoen
    @cupofjoen 4 місяці тому +5

    Look at this baby jet, really cute. I want it!

  • @patrickguimaraes3879
    @patrickguimaraes3879 5 місяців тому +10

    Good job!👏👏👏

  • @ricardofavero1318
    @ricardofavero1318 5 місяців тому +10

    Esse é um multi missao, carga, reabastecimento em vou, transporte de tropas, e 2x mais econômico ,manutencao mais barata, levanta e pousa em qualquer terreno em pocas distância, quer mais ainda nunca vcs viram cair um aviao brasileiro.

  • @heitormneto
    @heitormneto 4 місяці тому +8

    This is the best airplane in its category! It’s amazing!

  • @DNPM11
    @DNPM11 5 місяців тому +8

    Simply is the best one

  • @cadetematt
    @cadetematt 4 місяці тому +36

    E ainda queriam vender a Embraer.
    Ainda bem que a Boeign tava em crise.

    • @silasrodrigues-zc1lp
      @silasrodrigues-zc1lp 4 місяці тому

      o bozo e o temer tentaram vender essa empresa.

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera 4 місяці тому +1

      Embraer é privada desde 1994. E nao ia ser vendida pra Boeing, ia fazer uma joint-venture, coisa que já fez outras 3 vezes.

    • @AriadneBarroso
      @AriadneBarroso 4 місяці тому

      @@gustavobuquera Quem frequentava São José dos Campos e a Embraer sabe que não era bem assim, uma simples joint-venture inocente para o bem da aviação comercial - e que mais tarde incluiria a parte de defesa também. Estavam mudando tudo na Embraer, inclusive removendo os logos e nomes dela de lá para colocar os da Boeing. No mais, a Boeing teve acesso a tudo quanto documento secreto de projetos da Embraer, enquanto a Embraer nada soube dos documentos de projetos da americana. E muito coincidentemente após ter acesso a tudo o que queria junto com os escândalos envolvendo o Boeing 787 Max e outros problemas internos, a Boeing simples deu um "tchau querida" culpando a Embraer. Foi um caso bem diferente das outras joint-ventures que a Embraer fez.

    • @cadetematt
      @cadetematt 4 місяці тому +8

      @@gustavobuquera ingenuidade custa caro, uma coisa é ser privado e a riqueza gerada ficar no país, outra coisa é fluir p contas de estrangeiros depois de todo o trabalho que nosso país teve.
      Se você acredita nessa maquiagem de Joint Venture, tudo bem, mas a Boeing adquirir 80% das operações comerciais da Embraer era outro nome pra mim ...

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera 4 місяці тому

      @@cadetematt Ingenuidade? Hahahahah vc nem sabe do que ta falando véi. Primeiro q nunca foi 80% DA EMBRAER mas 80% da NOVA EMPRESA que as duas iam abrir em conjunto, vc n tentou nem dar um google pra saber oq o termo significa e quer dar opiniao.
      Segundo "Fluir pra contas de estrangeiros"... Esse pensamento protecionista é a maior burrice do brasileiro e uma das coisas que condena a gente a continua subdesenvolvido.
      A Embraer tem fabrica nos EUA, Portugal, China, Singapura e vai expandir pros Emirados Arabes. É por isso que ela dá certo, pq foge dessa jumentice.
      Esses conspiracionismos socialistas tem q acabar senao vao acabar com o Brasil, o povo acredita nessas merda e os politicos adoram.

  • @joseezequieldeoliveira3693
    @joseezequieldeoliveira3693 5 місяців тому +15

    Very well, tankyou.🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @paulor9577
    @paulor9577 5 місяців тому +13

    Awesome!

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 5 місяців тому +26

    Be the US airforce would like to buy them but can't . Will be interesting to see if Canada and mexico buy them

  • @Fernando-vn4vf
    @Fernando-vn4vf 5 місяців тому +39

    Correction. EMB 110 Bandeirante. Not EMB 110 Band Avanti 😅😅

  • @_mklein
    @_mklein 4 місяці тому +3

    Best stock I ever bought!! 💰 💰

  • @davidnogueira4417
    @davidnogueira4417 4 місяці тому +9

    Santos Dumont 🇧🇷

  • @MrSuwds
    @MrSuwds 4 місяці тому +11

    Czech Republic 02 units

  • @ЖоэлиоАП
    @ЖоэлиоАП 4 місяці тому +3

    O melhor cargueiro na atualidade versátil e multi tarefa

  • @Hellgazer
    @Hellgazer 5 місяців тому +12

    I have shares in this company

  • @frankmorgan2772
    @frankmorgan2772 5 місяців тому +20

    It might COMPETE with the big aviation industry companies , but not "destrou" it !!!

    • @Gustavovisk21
      @Gustavovisk21 5 місяців тому +13

      It’s a fierce competitor, the industry will need to adapt or get obsolete, specially Lockheed and Airbus

  • @runesvensson1244
    @runesvensson1244 5 місяців тому +79

    "Band Avanti"?? Don't you mean Bandeirante?

    • @Azv8217
      @Azv8217 5 місяців тому +8

      "Band Avanti" is not even a thing !!😂🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @ayrtonlucas419
      @ayrtonlucas419 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Azv8217 é o lema da tv bandeirantes, na busca da audiência. "Band Avanti! Toca a música do corinthians, Cascão."

    • @Phenx
      @Phenx 5 місяців тому

      Another shitty AI autogenerated videos

    • @sainjor3932
      @sainjor3932 5 місяців тому +6

      This guy destroyed the history and the name of the plane 😔

    • @AriadneBarroso
      @AriadneBarroso 4 місяці тому +1

      Americans never managed how to pronounce Bandeirante correctly. This happens since this aircraft was built and became a succesfull aircraft when it comes to regional aviation - at that time, Americans used to call Bandeirante as "Bandit". It's pretty normal make those kind of "mistakes" when it comes to a foreign language which have different sounds of yours.

  • @davibelo
    @davibelo 3 місяці тому +1

    the aircraft is totally sick!

  • @russelbrazil
    @russelbrazil 5 місяців тому +7

    This is Brazil

  • @JAMMAJ-cq2bl
    @JAMMAJ-cq2bl 5 місяців тому +6

    EMB 110 BANDEIRANTE!!!!

  • @danielfraga5756
    @danielfraga5756 5 місяців тому +4

    Very good 🇧🇷

  • @BernGrylls
    @BernGrylls 4 місяці тому +1

    This plane is SLEEEEKKKKK! ❤

  • @marianolvn
    @marianolvn 4 місяці тому

    That´s a cool looking plane!!!

  • @play134
    @play134 4 місяці тому +1

    I live near the military village here in Bazil. I see it flying low sometimes. very silent, it looks like a glider

  • @mattiasrask1575
    @mattiasrask1575 Місяць тому

    Sweden has chosen to order the c390

  • @markdykstra8188
    @markdykstra8188 4 місяці тому

    The RNZAF was at one point seriously considering the C390 as its replacement for the C130H hercules....but opted for the C130 J instead.

  • @MarcEdig
    @MarcEdig 5 місяців тому +2

    this plus rapid dragon 👍

  • @kadu7259
    @kadu7259 4 місяці тому +4

    BRAZIL MENTIONED BRAZIL TOP 1 !!!!!!!

  • @vagnertavaresjr
    @vagnertavaresjr 3 місяці тому

    I always thought it was named KC-390... on some parts of the clip..it has KC-390 stamped on the airframe..

    • @hplay1077
      @hplay1077 3 місяці тому

      Existe duas versões, c390 e kc 390

    • @vagnertavaresjr
      @vagnertavaresjr 3 місяці тому

      @@hplay1077 O KC-390 Millennium e o C-390 Millennium são a mesma aeronave, mas com designações diferentes:
      KC-390 Millennium
      A designação original da aeronave, que foi alterada para C-390 Millennium em novembro de 2019. (segundo o google)

  • @terra2jaquesmuller333
    @terra2jaquesmuller333 2 місяці тому

    Is the best.

  • @LjubomirKrajnovic
    @LjubomirKrajnovic 4 місяці тому

    You Should've mentioned how does it compares to IL-76 MD90A range,speed,payload and cost wise.

  • @endi5739
    @endi5739 4 місяці тому

    The Airbus A400M is also a very good cargo plane.

  • @Canaldaautoescola
    @Canaldaautoescola 3 місяці тому

    Best

  • @AlexKing1_
    @AlexKing1_ 5 місяців тому +5

    wow

  • @syedputra5955
    @syedputra5955 4 місяці тому

    Modify it for passenger jets to compete againat b737 and s320.

  • @DanieldeAlcaniz
    @DanieldeAlcaniz 4 місяці тому

    From "Bandeirante" to "Band Avanti" is a big jump.

  • @pedrovictoror
    @pedrovictoror 3 місяці тому

    The EMB 110 is not called "Band Avanti", it's called "Bandeirante". It's the portuguese word for "Pioneer scouts".

  • @sankarist
    @sankarist 4 місяці тому +1

    This narration was done by IA. A human wouldn't be so obnoxious. It was like the names of the planes were in bold letters when it was text-to-speeching.

  • @derliming
    @derliming 3 місяці тому

    Os irmãos wright não foram os primeiros a levantar um voo, foi o nosso Amado Santos Dumont!!!!!

  • @davisnomura1962
    @davisnomura1962 4 місяці тому

    Thunderbird 2 😊

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 5 місяців тому

    How does it compare the Airbus A400M (excluding cost)

  • @michaelshore2300
    @michaelshore2300 5 місяців тому

    OOOOO ! You say that about all aircraft

  • @Andrade_07
    @Andrade_07 3 місяці тому

    "Band Avanti"

  • @steliosoctavios
    @steliosoctavios 4 місяці тому +1

    BANDEIRANTES not Band Avanti

  • @ragupta2000
    @ragupta2000 25 днів тому

    Where is the gunship version of it ?

  • @kimkristensen2816
    @kimkristensen2816 5 місяців тому

    Make an extended version like the Hercules. And it has a actual toilet

  • @tdrewman
    @tdrewman 4 місяці тому

    A true test of of it to compare with a C-130 is to fly it into a hurricane and see how it holds up..

    • @byonex
      @byonex 3 місяці тому

      Tell me a situation where an aircraft will pass through a hurricane instead of diverting course and what the chances of that happening are. Listen, little American, a hurricane is only a serious problem on your territory.

  • @strikebr
    @strikebr 4 місяці тому +2

    Band Avanti? Seriously? It's BANDEIRANTE. It means Brazilian explorer.

  • @FireLt2017
    @FireLt2017 4 місяці тому

    Looks like a copy of a 1970's Boeing design except the Boeing had the engines on top of the wings

    • @JosesalatielSalatiel-fl3qx
      @JosesalatielSalatiel-fl3qx Місяць тому

      Kkk americanos continua mentindo e querendo se os melhores 😂, vocês perderam para os vietis konks, otário 😂

  • @ampm9771
    @ampm9771 2 місяці тому

    If I was a country, I'd still buy C-130 which is better in every single way.

  • @natanaellevicc7457
    @natanaellevicc7457 4 місяці тому

    "Band Avanti"?

  • @gustavoehler
    @gustavoehler 3 місяці тому

    It’s Bandeirante, not Band Avanti

  • @herik.franco
    @herik.franco 3 місяці тому

    EMB 110 Band Avanti? No! Is Bandeirante!

  • @spudgun4321
    @spudgun4321 4 місяці тому

    Did, did Embraer write this puff piece? Emparciality much?

  • @matai2437
    @matai2437 Місяць тому

    It can carry an elite crew with Firepower anywhere in the world 😊😎

  • @ronaldraygan5604
    @ronaldraygan5604 4 місяці тому

    No good comperison, C-130 Super Hercules is better suited for general purpose

    • @ThassioMarcelo
      @ThassioMarcelo 3 місяці тому

      basead in what? your opinion? hahahaha

  • @droneskyflying3561
    @droneskyflying3561 4 місяці тому +1

    👍👍👍🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @ecoideazventures6417
    @ecoideazventures6417 4 місяці тому

    Hello Aviatrix, how one military plane can destroy the Entire Aviation Industry? It's a great aircraft that can compete well against the established players, but don't go overboard with your clickbaits!

    • @fabricioazevedo2361
      @fabricioazevedo2361 4 місяці тому

      Oh... it is just a figure of speech. But it is great plane anyway.

  • @rinkubilga
    @rinkubilga 3 місяці тому

    87 tons ??????. Looks like a mistake......😊

  • @carlosalbertoluizsilverio9178
    @carlosalbertoluizsilverio9178 5 місяців тому +15

    𝙈𝙚𝙡𝙝𝙤𝙧 𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙖̃𝙤 𝙙𝙚 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖 𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙚 𝙙𝙤 𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙤 .

  • @Marcelo1945able
    @Marcelo1945able 4 місяці тому +1

    E quiseram vender a Embraer alguns anos atrás para uma de suas concorrentes.
    Esse é o tipo de patriota que bota a bandeira nas costas e sai gritando nas ruas orgulhosos de entregar seu país de bandeja aos concorrentes.

  • @peterjohansson739
    @peterjohansson739 2 місяці тому

    AI.

  • @unknownorigin8446
    @unknownorigin8446 2 місяці тому

    Too small. I only approve Globemaster and Galaxy.

  • @angelonuti952
    @angelonuti952 4 місяці тому

    Bandeirante, not Band Avanti

  • @peredavi
    @peredavi 3 місяці тому

    3:20. That is a C-17 photo. “ C130 cargo jet.”😂 $1.5 billion. One dollar.5 billion. What an amateurish video .

  • @haroldhousen3876
    @haroldhousen3876 4 місяці тому

    why do you write such rediculous titles

  • @coriscotupi
    @coriscotupi 5 місяців тому

    Stopped watching at the 36 second mark, with the "Band Avanti" thingie.

  • @ergonomista347
    @ergonomista347 5 місяців тому +1

    Comprei uma com base diferente e não gostei. O mesh é muito duro, apoio de cabeça não achei ergonômico e minha lombar ficou doendo. Mas parabéns pelo Canal. 👍

    • @marioventura3448
      @marioventura3448 5 місяців тому +3

      O que vc quer tá duro, mas já tem dona!

    • @gustarrezende
      @gustarrezende 5 місяців тому +2

      O negócio tá de pé, só tô esperando uma posição sua.

    • @sainjor3932
      @sainjor3932 5 місяців тому +1

      Tem que reclamar pra fabricante, eu comprei o meu e o mesh tá super molinho

  • @Ferreira019760
    @Ferreira019760 4 місяці тому

    If they ever get them out of the production line in enough quantities to satisfy demand, and without making the same type of mistakes that Boeing has been doing. It still needs to be battle tested, and how likely is it to return to base after being hard hit. The C-130 is known by its resilience. It may be an old design, but it has been getting upgrades and more are sure to come. I haven't seen any possibility of carrying armament for ground support like the C-130 can have.
    It's an interesting plane, but it's not a NATO manufacturer. That means that it won't integrate with NATO's ecosystem. Congrats are in order for the effort, and it's likely to be a very capable aircraft. I'm just not sure that it's a replacement for the C-130. Also, because of being a part of BRICKS, it's not likely to become a NATO member in the foreseeable future.
    Time will tell if it has the chops to match and replace the C-130. On paper everything seems a lot better, but as it's commonly known, the proof is in the puding. In other words, it needs to actively participate in real conflicts to earn its stripes. If Embraer cannot provide that reliability, then there is no point in placing orders with the intent of replacing the C-130. They may fill other logistics positions still, there is no shame in that. The C-130 may be overkill to certain jobs that the C390 can perform better and cheaper. Personally, I want an aircraft that can perform the mission and return to the base with a complete crew, even if has been hit in the process. Airplanes are not missiles, that's why we have them. We don't want them back. Airplanes however, we want them to last for as many missions as possible, and if it cannot resist the first encounter with the enemy, then I'm afraid all we have is a very expensive manned missile on a potentially suicide mission.
    I suggest a sober analysis instead of all the hype and excitement that has been going around. This has nothing to do with putting Brazil down, kudos for what they are achieving. I just want them to put their money where their mouth is, just like everyone else. I will gladly eat my words if I'm proven wrong, and I do hope that I'm wrong, for the sake of a lot of pilot crews.

  • @Nnomadd
    @Nnomadd 5 місяців тому +5

    what's up with the juvenile idiocy of these youtube titles ?

    • @basemilitarvideomagazine
      @basemilitarvideomagazine 5 місяців тому +6

      They get many clicks, that's why... 🤷

    • @RTPJu
      @RTPJu 5 місяців тому +1

      And, then, I block the channel to never be baited again

  • @thesirmaddog8209
    @thesirmaddog8209 5 місяців тому

    This just sounds like a commercial... The US just replaced ALL C-130H's with the C130J which has all the avionics this aircraft does and can do still more than this... No mention of all specials C130... They don't have a AC version of the C390.... And since the C-130 has just replaced most of the people that buy them ... The Market has none for a couple decades from now

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 5 місяців тому

      @@ConanOG LOL... The thing is the orders have already been delivered... So 20 years down the road we will see what happens but as for now... NO one needs anything else

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 5 місяців тому

      @@ConanOG lol... The BIGGEST is the US cause there are some special C-130's that other countries don't get and This C-390 don't make either

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 5 місяців тому

      @@ConanOG Which means YOU thought small which is why you FAIL... The BIGGEST order is the US... There are more built for the US than the WORLD... Not to mention there are other aircraft... The A400 which is very popular with Europe... So might build get a couple orders but timing is bad at this moment... Like I said 20yrs might be a different ball game

    • @marcioyoshisaki3418
      @marcioyoshisaki3418 5 місяців тому +12

      The only thing that makes c130 better is the American government subsidies.

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 5 місяців тому

      @@marcioyoshisaki3418 LOL... You only think that cause you don't know ALL the benefits of the C-130 and why the US didn't try to make something to replace it they just built new ones... The C-130 has the shortest take off and landing of any aircraft and is capable of landing on any terrain and has done this in real world not just simulations... And like I said the US versions come in many platforms other than just Cargo.... But not sure if the US would sell those to other countries

  • @kCI251
    @kCI251 5 місяців тому +6

    A twin jet vs four engine C-130 sounds great until that day when you have one engine fail. The C390 will not have the ability to continue a mission like the C130 can do with one engine shut down. All it takes is a one well placed round to one of the C390 engines to take it out of action.

    • @alvaromarcelogeroldi9778
      @alvaromarcelogeroldi9778 5 місяців тому +26

      For sure , countries like Holland, Austria, Portugal, Hungary, South Korea , India intentio to buy over 60 planes, green light from USA Mariner are not aware about your advice. Please contact them urgently.

    • @v1n1c1u55anto5
      @v1n1c1u55anto5 5 місяців тому +11

      I bet that with only 1 engine the Embraer can still fly faster than the Hercules and with 1 engine fly faster and HIGHER than the Hercule with only 3 engines.

    • @umbertobahia6088
      @umbertobahia6088 4 місяці тому +1

      Bala não irá derrubar mas mísseis derrubará qualquer um mesmo com 20 motores!

    • @umbertobahia6088
      @umbertobahia6088 4 місяці тому

      ​@@alvaromarcelogeroldi9778eu também queria comprar um desses KC 390 daqui uns 30 anos 😂😂

    • @tiagodesouza1160
      @tiagodesouza1160 4 місяці тому

      Agimos como se tudo desse certo!!

  • @solinvictus1234
    @solinvictus1234 5 місяців тому

    It will fail. No one will buy a two engine heavy cargo plane. Cargo are valuable, if you lose an engine of the two, the plane will fall. 4 engines planes are still preferable by everyone, cause when you put stuff on a cargo plane the only thing you want is that the cargo have to arrive at destination no matter what.

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer 5 місяців тому +5

      People are buying. I have shares in this company.

    • @moysesciro1225
      @moysesciro1225 5 місяців тому +12

      Dá para perceber que você não sabe o que está falando.

    • @FlavioSantos-uw1mr
      @FlavioSantos-uw1mr 5 місяців тому +8

      Pretty sure it was tested to fly with just one engine, but hey whatever you say man

    • @solinvictus1234
      @solinvictus1234 5 місяців тому

      @@FlavioSantos-uw1mr Pretty sure that in a war zone 4 engines are better than 2.

    • @pedrorodrigues7285
      @pedrorodrigues7285 5 місяців тому +5

      That two engine are the same Boeing engines, so is already tested for several years.

  • @ticotechhouston4917
    @ticotechhouston4917 4 місяці тому

  • @DaimenTheFool
    @DaimenTheFool 4 місяці тому

    Next fit it with a mounted GAU, so that the Hercules is replaced for good. 🫶