The NEW Embraer C390 Will DESTROY The Entire Aviation Industry! Here's Why

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 235

  • @JubinUpadhyay-cu2ds
    @JubinUpadhyay-cu2ds Місяць тому +101

    India loves Embraer ! ❤ Indian Air Force is happy to use Brazilian aircraft’s ❤

  • @brenocostateixeira
    @brenocostateixeira Місяць тому +109

    Santos Dumont was a unique Brazilian. He flew balloons and Zeppelins and created the first self-propelled plane, which managed to fly, with an audience as a witness. At the time, he asked Mr. Cartier himself to make a wristwatch, as this would help a lot on his flights. There are also exclusive Cartier watches, from the Santos-Dumont series. And he was the one who created the famous Brazilian, which scares foreigners, our ELECTRIC SHOWER hahahahaahh

    • @Marcelo1945able
      @Marcelo1945able Місяць тому +6

      É verdade, você lembrou desse detalhe que pouca gente cita, o relógio de pulso da Cartier. Grande inventor Santos Dumont.

    • @dobbleGbr
      @dobbleGbr Місяць тому +3

      ele era o senhor dos ares, digníssimo santos

    • @agbottan
      @agbottan 26 днів тому

      I'm getting baths from the electrical shower for 45 years and never died.
      (Got some minor electrical shocks, but nothing above the expected)

  • @sonnymagalhaes9203
    @sonnymagalhaes9203 2 місяці тому +122

    It's hilarious to see how Lockheed Martin uses the C-130's inferiority by saying that it's exactly what customers prefer...
    The Kawazaki is really very good, however, it is bigger, heavier, requires more runway for landings and take-offs, does not have the same adaptability, in addition to being infinitely more expensive, both in terms of price and operation and maintenance. Arguably, the C-390 is an incredible aircraft and the best in its class. Congrats for your video.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP Місяць тому

      You forget
      Lockheed is major company and there is no doubt they can deliver on time
      Embraer is not

    • @sonnymagalhaes9203
      @sonnymagalhaes9203 Місяць тому +7

      @@verdebusterAP What nonsense are you saying, brother...
      Firstly, there is not a single case of late deliveries by EMBRAER. I challenge you to come up with just one.
      Furthermore, it would be good for you to be aware of current news that shows significant delivery delays from both Airbus and Boing. This would avoid the embarrassment of issuing erroneous data.
      Furthermore... whether or not the C-130Js are delivered on time doesn't change the fact that they will continue to be inferior and more expensive, so i don't understand what the purpose of your message was.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP Місяць тому

      @@sonnymagalhaes9203
      Lets add some reality to that shall we
      First Embraer is use building commercial aircraft which are quick and easy to make. Military grade aircraft are not
      The Brazilian Air Force ordered 28 in 2014 and its first flight was 2015 yet its 2024 and they only have 6 planes
      Lockheed C-130J are considerable larger yet they are delivered in fraction of the time
      Inferior , ha
      mean the C-130J superior
      Lets see the C-390 pull the C-130J weight
      oh wait it cant
      C-130J comes AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO
      The C-390 only matches the KC and thats it

    • @sonnymagalhaes9203
      @sonnymagalhaes9203 Місяць тому +2

      @@verdebusterAP Well my friend, apparently you also have to find out about State acquisition processes. It's not like going to the corner and buying an object off the shelf...
      Let's go: As you know (or at least you should know), the C-390 Millenium is a new aircraft starting from scratch, using new concepts and innovative technologies. This requires specifications of what is desired for the aircraft, design, consultation, price survey, approvals, prototype manufacturing, testing and much more. I can already say that the entire process took place within the expected schedule (no delays). Due to the pandemic occurring around the world, the FAB's military budget underwent changes, which forced it and EMBRAER to renegotiate the contracts (which was accepted by EMBRAER, without making things difficult for the FAB). There were changes in the number of aircraft required and the deadline for delivering them. (If you are interested, take a look at the subject).
      "(...) The Lockheed C-130J are considerably larger..."
      Bro, at least read the aircraft's technical sheet before saying something...
      The C-390 does EVERYTHING the C-190 does, but BETTER and FASTER. (He just doesn't land on aircraft carriers for obvious reasons...)
      -A small detail that you may also be unaware of: The C-130J actually also has the KC version, but what you didn't say is that the C-130J requires a "specific" aircraft for this role, while the C -390 Millenium, just put the refueling kit in flight... that is, if you need a freighter and an aerial refueler, you will have to buy 2 C-130J or just 1 C-390 Millenium with the 2 kits.
      And finally, what expertise or authority do you have to say what EMBRAER knows or doesn't do? Saying something like that is completely nonsense.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP Місяць тому

      @@sonnymagalhaes9203
      More excuses I see
      Again lets add reality
      The state acquisition processes has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. What Embraer hoped for is a massive influx of orders
      yet after ten years on the market, they only sit at 45 orders and of that 45, only 17 from outside the country so like Dassault did with the Rafale, they quietly renegotiated the contract with the Brazilian Air Force to stretch out deliveries over a longer period in hopes of making more orders.The C-390 hasnt gotten any serious orders
      2-4 planes per order at most while the C-130J averages between 10-12 planes per ordeer
      No the C-390 does nothing like the C-130J can
      I dont see any AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO variants of the C-390 do we
      -A small detail that you may also be unaware of: The C-130J actually also has the KC version,
      So you cant read as I clearly wrote AC/EC/HC/KC/MC/WF/SOF as well as TACAMO
      The C-390 has the KC variant but none of the other variants

  • @edirib2004
    @edirib2004 Місяць тому +33

    The jump of development that Embraer experienced in less than 20 years is terrific!

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera Місяць тому +1

      Privatizing a company does wonders. It became private 30 years ago and was listed 24, this made a HUGE governance difference.

    • @aryborel9740
      @aryborel9740 23 дні тому +1

      ​@@gustavobuquera😂😂😂😂😂

    • @aryborel9740
      @aryborel9740 23 дні тому +1

      Acho que vc não conhece a história da companhia! 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @seuvagem1950
      @seuvagem1950 14 днів тому

      ​@@gustavobuquera😂😂😂😂 antes a Embraer fabricava aviaozinho de papel, né? Kkkkkk A Embraer é gigante há muito tempo!! O desempenho atual de deve a encomenda e financiamento ESTATAL para os seus projetos!!

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera 14 днів тому

      @@seuvagem1950 antes ela dava prejuízo e só servia como cabide de emprego politico. Era uma bosta msm cm rios de dinheiro do povo sendo jogado nela.

  • @ThalineDaniele
    @ThalineDaniele 2 місяці тому +98

    O melhor Avião do mundo na sua categoria, estou me formando no ITA para entrar na Embraer.

  • @Hellgazer
    @Hellgazer 2 місяці тому +177

    Brazil invented the airplane, and we build aircrafts for a long time.

    • @karlosgomes1419
      @karlosgomes1419 2 місяці тому

      😂😂😂

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer 2 місяці тому +11

      @@karlosgomes1419 why you laughing?

    • @igorluiz9551
      @igorluiz9551 Місяць тому +2

      @@Hellgazer because we didn't lol

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer Місяць тому +41

      @@igorluiz9551 have you ever heard of Santos Dumont, who flew over Paris 3 years before the Wrights brothers?

    • @drbulltrader9107
      @drbulltrader9107 Місяць тому +14

      @@Hellgazer no, he don't know Dummont

  • @pedrovcvc
    @pedrovcvc 2 місяці тому +29

    I see one of those almost every week, flying above my home! Fast and beautiful

  • @scientech7906
    @scientech7906 2 місяці тому +24

    The best medium freighter in the world.

  • @ulissesferreira5892
    @ulissesferreira5892 2 місяці тому +58

    Embraer ❤ Rolex off aircraft

  • @clebertonalves2161
    @clebertonalves2161 2 місяці тому +27

    🇧🇷O KC 390 é simplesmente espetacular

  • @YlmazDALKIRANscallion
    @YlmazDALKIRANscallion Місяць тому +19

    I hope Turkish Army buy these aircrafts in the future instead of C-130.

  • @MariahGessinger
    @MariahGessinger Місяць тому +7

    Santos Dumot está Feliz! O Brasil inventou o avião e agora reinventa a avião militar de carga 👏🏼

  • @cupofjoen
    @cupofjoen Місяць тому +4

    Look at this baby jet, really cute. I want it!

  • @Fernando-vn4vf
    @Fernando-vn4vf 2 місяці тому +39

    Correction. EMB 110 Bandeirante. Not EMB 110 Band Avanti 😅😅

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 Місяць тому +24

    Be the US airforce would like to buy them but can't . Will be interesting to see if Canada and mexico buy them

  • @runesvensson1244
    @runesvensson1244 2 місяці тому +78

    "Band Avanti"?? Don't you mean Bandeirante?

    • @Azv8217
      @Azv8217 2 місяці тому +8

      "Band Avanti" is not even a thing !!😂🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @ayrtonlucas419
      @ayrtonlucas419 2 місяці тому

      ​@@Azv8217 é o lema da tv bandeirantes, na busca da audiência. "Band Avanti! Toca a música do corinthians, Cascão."

    • @Phenx
      @Phenx 2 місяці тому

      Another shitty AI autogenerated videos

    • @sainjor3932
      @sainjor3932 Місяць тому +6

      This guy destroyed the history and the name of the plane 😔

    • @AriadneBarroso
      @AriadneBarroso Місяць тому +1

      Americans never managed how to pronounce Bandeirante correctly. This happens since this aircraft was built and became a succesfull aircraft when it comes to regional aviation - at that time, Americans used to call Bandeirante as "Bandit". It's pretty normal make those kind of "mistakes" when it comes to a foreign language which have different sounds of yours.

  • @heitormneto
    @heitormneto Місяць тому +6

    This is the best airplane in its category! It’s amazing!

  • @ricardofavero1318
    @ricardofavero1318 2 місяці тому +9

    Esse é um multi missao, carga, reabastecimento em vou, transporte de tropas, e 2x mais econômico ,manutencao mais barata, levanta e pousa em qualquer terreno em pocas distância, quer mais ainda nunca vcs viram cair um aviao brasileiro.

  • @cadetematt
    @cadetematt Місяць тому +32

    E ainda queriam vender a Embraer.
    Ainda bem que a Boeign tava em crise.

    • @silasrodrigues-zc1lp
      @silasrodrigues-zc1lp Місяць тому

      o bozo e o temer tentaram vender essa empresa.

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera Місяць тому +1

      Embraer é privada desde 1994. E nao ia ser vendida pra Boeing, ia fazer uma joint-venture, coisa que já fez outras 3 vezes.

    • @AriadneBarroso
      @AriadneBarroso Місяць тому

      @@gustavobuquera Quem frequentava São José dos Campos e a Embraer sabe que não era bem assim, uma simples joint-venture inocente para o bem da aviação comercial - e que mais tarde incluiria a parte de defesa também. Estavam mudando tudo na Embraer, inclusive removendo os logos e nomes dela de lá para colocar os da Boeing. No mais, a Boeing teve acesso a tudo quanto documento secreto de projetos da Embraer, enquanto a Embraer nada soube dos documentos de projetos da americana. E muito coincidentemente após ter acesso a tudo o que queria junto com os escândalos envolvendo o Boeing 787 Max e outros problemas internos, a Boeing simples deu um "tchau querida" culpando a Embraer. Foi um caso bem diferente das outras joint-ventures que a Embraer fez.

    • @cadetematt
      @cadetematt Місяць тому +6

      @@gustavobuquera ingenuidade custa caro, uma coisa é ser privado e a riqueza gerada ficar no país, outra coisa é fluir p contas de estrangeiros depois de todo o trabalho que nosso país teve.
      Se você acredita nessa maquiagem de Joint Venture, tudo bem, mas a Boeing adquirir 80% das operações comerciais da Embraer era outro nome pra mim ...

    • @gustavobuquera
      @gustavobuquera Місяць тому

      @@cadetematt Ingenuidade? Hahahahah vc nem sabe do que ta falando véi. Primeiro q nunca foi 80% DA EMBRAER mas 80% da NOVA EMPRESA que as duas iam abrir em conjunto, vc n tentou nem dar um google pra saber oq o termo significa e quer dar opiniao.
      Segundo "Fluir pra contas de estrangeiros"... Esse pensamento protecionista é a maior burrice do brasileiro e uma das coisas que condena a gente a continua subdesenvolvido.
      A Embraer tem fabrica nos EUA, Portugal, China, Singapura e vai expandir pros Emirados Arabes. É por isso que ela dá certo, pq foge dessa jumentice.
      Esses conspiracionismos socialistas tem q acabar senao vao acabar com o Brasil, o povo acredita nessas merda e os politicos adoram.

  • @MrSuwds
    @MrSuwds Місяць тому +10

    Czech Republic 02 units

  • @DNPM11
    @DNPM11 Місяць тому +7

    Simply is the best one

  • @davidnogueira4417
    @davidnogueira4417 Місяць тому +8

    Santos Dumont 🇧🇷

  • @joseezequieldeoliveira3693
    @joseezequieldeoliveira3693 2 місяці тому +14

    Very well, tankyou.🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @paulor9577
    @paulor9577 2 місяці тому +13

    Awesome!

  • @frankmorgan2772
    @frankmorgan2772 2 місяці тому +19

    It might COMPETE with the big aviation industry companies , but not "destrou" it !!!

    • @Gustavovisk21
      @Gustavovisk21 2 місяці тому +12

      It’s a fierce competitor, the industry will need to adapt or get obsolete, specially Lockheed and Airbus

  • @Hellgazer
    @Hellgazer 2 місяці тому +11

    I have shares in this company

  • @patrickguimaraes3879
    @patrickguimaraes3879 2 місяці тому +10

    Good job!👏👏👏

  • @bernhardjordan9200
    @bernhardjordan9200 25 днів тому +1

    During the pandemic it airlifted pure oxygen to Manaus, it was an heroic mission

  • @_mklein
    @_mklein Місяць тому +2

    Best stock I ever bought!! 💰 💰

  • @davibelo
    @davibelo 24 дні тому +1

    the aircraft is totally sick!

  • @CaioGondimrusselbrazil
    @CaioGondimrusselbrazil Місяць тому +6

    This is Brazil

  • @ЖоэлиоАП
    @ЖоэлиоАП Місяць тому +2

    O melhor cargueiro na atualidade versátil e multi tarefa

  • @JAMMAJ-cq2bl
    @JAMMAJ-cq2bl 2 місяці тому +6

    EMB 110 BANDEIRANTE!!!!

  • @BernGrylls
    @BernGrylls Місяць тому +1

    This plane is SLEEEEKKKKK! ❤

  • @danielfraga5756
    @danielfraga5756 2 місяці тому +4

    Very good 🇧🇷

  • @kadu7259
    @kadu7259 Місяць тому +4

    BRAZIL MENTIONED BRAZIL TOP 1 !!!!!!!

  • @play134
    @play134 Місяць тому +1

    I live near the military village here in Bazil. I see it flying low sometimes. very silent, it looks like a glider

  • @marianolvn
    @marianolvn 29 днів тому

    That´s a cool looking plane!!!

  • @markdykstra8188
    @markdykstra8188 Місяць тому

    The RNZAF was at one point seriously considering the C390 as its replacement for the C130H hercules....but opted for the C130 J instead.

  • @carlosalbertoluizsilverio9178
    @carlosalbertoluizsilverio9178 2 місяці тому +15

    𝙈𝙚𝙡𝙝𝙤𝙧 𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙖̃𝙤 𝙙𝙚 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖 𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙚 𝙙𝙤 𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙤 .

  • @MarcEdig
    @MarcEdig 2 місяці тому +2

    this plus rapid dragon 👍

  • @vagnertavaresjr
    @vagnertavaresjr 17 днів тому

    I always thought it was named KC-390... on some parts of the clip..it has KC-390 stamped on the airframe..

    • @hplay1077
      @hplay1077 11 днів тому

      Existe duas versões, c390 e kc 390

    • @vagnertavaresjr
      @vagnertavaresjr 11 днів тому

      @@hplay1077 O KC-390 Millennium e o C-390 Millennium são a mesma aeronave, mas com designações diferentes:
      KC-390 Millennium
      A designação original da aeronave, que foi alterada para C-390 Millennium em novembro de 2019. (segundo o google)

  • @pedrovictoror
    @pedrovictoror 20 днів тому

    The EMB 110 is not called "Band Avanti", it's called "Bandeirante". It's the portuguese word for "Pioneer scouts".

  • @LjubomirKrajnovic
    @LjubomirKrajnovic Місяць тому

    You Should've mentioned how does it compares to IL-76 MD90A range,speed,payload and cost wise.

  • @AlexKing1_
    @AlexKing1_ 2 місяці тому +5

    wow

  • @sankarist
    @sankarist Місяць тому +1

    This narration was done by IA. A human wouldn't be so obnoxious. It was like the names of the planes were in bold letters when it was text-to-speeching.

  • @endi5739
    @endi5739 Місяць тому

    The Airbus A400M is also a very good cargo plane.

  • @syedputra5955
    @syedputra5955 Місяць тому

    Modify it for passenger jets to compete againat b737 and s320.

  • @Canadaautoescola
    @Canadaautoescola 19 днів тому

    Best

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 Місяць тому

    How does it compare the Airbus A400M (excluding cost)

  • @strikebr
    @strikebr Місяць тому +2

    Band Avanti? Seriously? It's BANDEIRANTE. It means Brazilian explorer.

  • @DanieldeAlcaniz
    @DanieldeAlcaniz Місяць тому

    From "Bandeirante" to "Band Avanti" is a big jump.

  • @michaelshore2300
    @michaelshore2300 2 місяці тому

    OOOOO ! You say that about all aircraft

  • @steliosoctavios
    @steliosoctavios 29 днів тому +1

    BANDEIRANTES not Band Avanti

  • @derliming
    @derliming 21 день тому

    Os irmãos wright não foram os primeiros a levantar um voo, foi o nosso Amado Santos Dumont!!!!!

  • @Andrade_07
    @Andrade_07 26 днів тому

    "Band Avanti"

  • @kimkristensen2816
    @kimkristensen2816 2 місяці тому

    Make an extended version like the Hercules. And it has a actual toilet

  • @davisnomura1962
    @davisnomura1962 Місяць тому

    Thunderbird 2 😊

  • @tdrewman
    @tdrewman Місяць тому

    A true test of of it to compare with a C-130 is to fly it into a hurricane and see how it holds up..

    • @byonex
      @byonex 15 днів тому

      Tell me a situation where an aircraft will pass through a hurricane instead of diverting course and what the chances of that happening are. Listen, little American, a hurricane is only a serious problem on your territory.

  • @registrationhater
    @registrationhater Місяць тому

    Looks like a copy of a 1970's Boeing design except the Boeing had the engines on top of the wings

  • @natanaellevicc7457
    @natanaellevicc7457 Місяць тому

    "Band Avanti"?

  • @spudgun4321
    @spudgun4321 Місяць тому

    Did, did Embraer write this puff piece? Emparciality much?

  • @ronaldraygan5604
    @ronaldraygan5604 Місяць тому

    No good comperison, C-130 Super Hercules is better suited for general purpose

  • @gustavoehler
    @gustavoehler 26 днів тому

    It’s Bandeirante, not Band Avanti

  • @herik.franco
    @herik.franco 18 днів тому

    EMB 110 Band Avanti? No! Is Bandeirante!

  • @droneskyflying3561
    @droneskyflying3561 Місяць тому +1

    👍👍👍🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @haroldhousen3876
    @haroldhousen3876 Місяць тому

    why do you write such rediculous titles

  • @ecoideazventures6417
    @ecoideazventures6417 Місяць тому

    Hello Aviatrix, how one military plane can destroy the Entire Aviation Industry? It's a great aircraft that can compete well against the established players, but don't go overboard with your clickbaits!

    • @fabricioazevedo2361
      @fabricioazevedo2361 Місяць тому

      Oh... it is just a figure of speech. But it is great plane anyway.

  • @coriscotupi
    @coriscotupi 2 місяці тому

    Stopped watching at the 36 second mark, with the "Band Avanti" thingie.

  • @angelonuti952
    @angelonuti952 Місяць тому

    Bandeirante, not Band Avanti

  • @Marcelo1945able
    @Marcelo1945able Місяць тому +1

    E quiseram vender a Embraer alguns anos atrás para uma de suas concorrentes.
    Esse é o tipo de patriota que bota a bandeira nas costas e sai gritando nas ruas orgulhosos de entregar seu país de bandeja aos concorrentes.

  • @peredavi
    @peredavi 10 днів тому

    3:20. That is a C-17 photo. “ C130 cargo jet.”😂 $1.5 billion. One dollar.5 billion. What an amateurish video .

  • @Ferreira019760
    @Ferreira019760 Місяць тому

    If they ever get them out of the production line in enough quantities to satisfy demand, and without making the same type of mistakes that Boeing has been doing. It still needs to be battle tested, and how likely is it to return to base after being hard hit. The C-130 is known by its resilience. It may be an old design, but it has been getting upgrades and more are sure to come. I haven't seen any possibility of carrying armament for ground support like the C-130 can have.
    It's an interesting plane, but it's not a NATO manufacturer. That means that it won't integrate with NATO's ecosystem. Congrats are in order for the effort, and it's likely to be a very capable aircraft. I'm just not sure that it's a replacement for the C-130. Also, because of being a part of BRICKS, it's not likely to become a NATO member in the foreseeable future.
    Time will tell if it has the chops to match and replace the C-130. On paper everything seems a lot better, but as it's commonly known, the proof is in the puding. In other words, it needs to actively participate in real conflicts to earn its stripes. If Embraer cannot provide that reliability, then there is no point in placing orders with the intent of replacing the C-130. They may fill other logistics positions still, there is no shame in that. The C-130 may be overkill to certain jobs that the C390 can perform better and cheaper. Personally, I want an aircraft that can perform the mission and return to the base with a complete crew, even if has been hit in the process. Airplanes are not missiles, that's why we have them. We don't want them back. Airplanes however, we want them to last for as many missions as possible, and if it cannot resist the first encounter with the enemy, then I'm afraid all we have is a very expensive manned missile on a potentially suicide mission.
    I suggest a sober analysis instead of all the hype and excitement that has been going around. This has nothing to do with putting Brazil down, kudos for what they are achieving. I just want them to put their money where their mouth is, just like everyone else. I will gladly eat my words if I'm proven wrong, and I do hope that I'm wrong, for the sake of a lot of pilot crews.

  • @ergonomista347
    @ergonomista347 2 місяці тому +1

    Comprei uma com base diferente e não gostei. O mesh é muito duro, apoio de cabeça não achei ergonômico e minha lombar ficou doendo. Mas parabéns pelo Canal. 👍

    • @marioventura3448
      @marioventura3448 2 місяці тому +3

      O que vc quer tá duro, mas já tem dona!

    • @gustarrezende
      @gustarrezende 2 місяці тому +2

      O negócio tá de pé, só tô esperando uma posição sua.

    • @sainjor3932
      @sainjor3932 Місяць тому +1

      Tem que reclamar pra fabricante, eu comprei o meu e o mesh tá super molinho

  • @Nnomadd
    @Nnomadd 2 місяці тому +5

    what's up with the juvenile idiocy of these youtube titles ?

    •  2 місяці тому +6

      They get many clicks, that's why... 🤷

    • @RTPJu
      @RTPJu 2 місяці тому +1

      And, then, I block the channel to never be baited again

  • @kCI251
    @kCI251 2 місяці тому +6

    A twin jet vs four engine C-130 sounds great until that day when you have one engine fail. The C390 will not have the ability to continue a mission like the C130 can do with one engine shut down. All it takes is a one well placed round to one of the C390 engines to take it out of action.

    • @alvaromarcelogeroldi9778
      @alvaromarcelogeroldi9778 2 місяці тому +26

      For sure , countries like Holland, Austria, Portugal, Hungary, South Korea , India intentio to buy over 60 planes, green light from USA Mariner are not aware about your advice. Please contact them urgently.

    • @v1n1c1u55anto5
      @v1n1c1u55anto5 2 місяці тому +11

      I bet that with only 1 engine the Embraer can still fly faster than the Hercules and with 1 engine fly faster and HIGHER than the Hercule with only 3 engines.

    • @umbertobahia6088
      @umbertobahia6088 Місяць тому +1

      Bala não irá derrubar mas mísseis derrubará qualquer um mesmo com 20 motores!

    • @umbertobahia6088
      @umbertobahia6088 Місяць тому

      ​@@alvaromarcelogeroldi9778eu também queria comprar um desses KC 390 daqui uns 30 anos 😂😂

    • @tiagodesouza1160
      @tiagodesouza1160 Місяць тому

      Agimos como se tudo desse certo!!

  • @thesirmaddog8209
    @thesirmaddog8209 2 місяці тому

    This just sounds like a commercial... The US just replaced ALL C-130H's with the C130J which has all the avionics this aircraft does and can do still more than this... No mention of all specials C130... They don't have a AC version of the C390.... And since the C-130 has just replaced most of the people that buy them ... The Market has none for a couple decades from now

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 2 місяці тому

      @@ConanOG LOL... The thing is the orders have already been delivered... So 20 years down the road we will see what happens but as for now... NO one needs anything else

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 2 місяці тому

      @@ConanOG lol... The BIGGEST is the US cause there are some special C-130's that other countries don't get and This C-390 don't make either

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 2 місяці тому

      @@ConanOG Which means YOU thought small which is why you FAIL... The BIGGEST order is the US... There are more built for the US than the WORLD... Not to mention there are other aircraft... The A400 which is very popular with Europe... So might build get a couple orders but timing is bad at this moment... Like I said 20yrs might be a different ball game

    • @marcioyoshisaki3418
      @marcioyoshisaki3418 2 місяці тому +12

      The only thing that makes c130 better is the American government subsidies.

    • @thesirmaddog8209
      @thesirmaddog8209 2 місяці тому

      @@marcioyoshisaki3418 LOL... You only think that cause you don't know ALL the benefits of the C-130 and why the US didn't try to make something to replace it they just built new ones... The C-130 has the shortest take off and landing of any aircraft and is capable of landing on any terrain and has done this in real world not just simulations... And like I said the US versions come in many platforms other than just Cargo.... But not sure if the US would sell those to other countries

  • @solinvictus1234
    @solinvictus1234 2 місяці тому

    It will fail. No one will buy a two engine heavy cargo plane. Cargo are valuable, if you lose an engine of the two, the plane will fall. 4 engines planes are still preferable by everyone, cause when you put stuff on a cargo plane the only thing you want is that the cargo have to arrive at destination no matter what.

    • @Hellgazer
      @Hellgazer 2 місяці тому +5

      People are buying. I have shares in this company.

    • @moysesciro1225
      @moysesciro1225 2 місяці тому +12

      Dá para perceber que você não sabe o que está falando.

    • @FlavioSantos-uw1mr
      @FlavioSantos-uw1mr 2 місяці тому +8

      Pretty sure it was tested to fly with just one engine, but hey whatever you say man

    • @solinvictus1234
      @solinvictus1234 2 місяці тому

      @@FlavioSantos-uw1mr Pretty sure that in a war zone 4 engines are better than 2.

    • @pedrorodrigues7285
      @pedrorodrigues7285 2 місяці тому +5

      That two engine are the same Boeing engines, so is already tested for several years.

  • @ticotechhouston4917
    @ticotechhouston4917 Місяць тому

  • @DaimenTheFool
    @DaimenTheFool Місяць тому

    Next fit it with a mounted GAU, so that the Hercules is replaced for good. 🫶