@@direden it wouldn't work in this case, since the cat's out of the bag. but plenty of people are poisoning the training data and it's obliterating many of these LLMs, plus they keep pumping out so much content that it's getting picked up as training data in other LLMs so they're literally cross-contaminating themselves with garbage
Wolf / Dire Den... you miss the point that AI art is trained without permission on actual human artists work, to the degree that some output results include signatures and leftover artifacts from the original human artist that it sourced from. This is art theft. It is more than just a new system to do business. It is an ethical question as well. Not to mention atrocious anatomy and mutant fingers and hands.
@@darthknight1 I fully understand that point. I was just presenting other aspects of the issue that don't get discussed as often. I'm not advocating for AI. I'm just presenting other facets of the discussion.
my opinion has changed on this recently. I'm pro ai art. Tons of disabled people can't hand -draw anymore and spend hours perfecting their art to make a new creations,and can type and edit on a computer for much longer. free AI art resources are often higher quality than famous paid ones, and often issues with it are because it's used as a shortcut so less time and money without real AI artists are spent creating with it. AI artists spend just as long on their art as a person using traditional media. i have issues with capitalism and the idea of owning art and ideas anyway, but there are also lots of AI art tools that exist only on donated art. lots of AI art tools only function your local computer and don't harm the environment any more than your PC can. again, my opinion on this was recently changed, I was really staunchly anti AI art until a few weeks ago, so I don't know as much about it as others but I learned a lot about it from reachartwork on Twitter and Tumblr and the away collective (away stands for are we art yet) I think it's misunderstood because it's being used badly by corporations wanting to turn a quick buck and people see that instead of the people who work hard usually it
No, companies bury tech all the time. We used to have electric cars in 1905. Automakers bought all the patents and shelved them.
@armorclasshero2103 that would be a great way to end AI. But where's the wealthy artist that will buy all patents and shelve AI?
@@direden it wouldn't work in this case, since the cat's out of the bag. but plenty of people are poisoning the training data and it's obliterating many of these LLMs, plus they keep pumping out so much content that it's getting picked up as training data in other LLMs so they're literally cross-contaminating themselves with garbage
Wolf / Dire Den... you miss the point that AI art is trained without permission on actual human artists work, to the degree that some output results include signatures and leftover artifacts from the original human artist that it sourced from. This is art theft. It is more than just a new system to do business. It is an ethical question as well. Not to mention atrocious anatomy and mutant fingers and hands.
@@darthknight1 I fully understand that point. I was just presenting other aspects of the issue that don't get discussed as often.
I'm not advocating for AI. I'm just presenting other facets of the discussion.
my opinion has changed on this recently. I'm pro ai art. Tons of disabled people can't hand -draw anymore and spend hours perfecting their art to make a new creations,and can type and edit on a computer for much longer. free AI art resources are often higher quality than famous paid ones, and often issues with it are because it's used as a shortcut so less time and money without real AI artists are spent creating with it. AI artists spend just as long on their art as a person using traditional media. i have issues with capitalism and the idea of owning art and ideas anyway, but there are also lots of AI art tools that exist only on donated art. lots of AI art tools only function your local computer and don't harm the environment any more than your PC can. again, my opinion on this was recently changed, I was really staunchly anti AI art until a few weeks ago, so I don't know as much about it as others but I learned a lot about it from reachartwork on Twitter and Tumblr and the away collective (away stands for are we art yet) I think it's misunderstood because it's being used badly by corporations wanting to turn a quick buck and people see that instead of the people who work hard usually it
also I want to add- it's free use, just like making a collage of other people's work and selling it is free use.