SaltEMike Reacts to Inside Star Citizen: Ironclad is Rad
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- The Video - • Inside Star Citizen: I...
Check out my main channel - / @saltemike
Check out my clips channel -
/ @saltemikeclips
Check Out My Twitch Stream to see this live: / saltemike
The Ironclad is if the C2 and the Hull C had a baby and that baby took steroids and joined a gang
spot on :D
Or simply how you would imagine if Drake designed a proper cargo ship. They get right down to business.
lol. So accurate.
More like the Cat and C2 had a baby.
C2 had a baby with first cousin SRV
The ironclad is the first ship that kinda "feels right" to me because you can tell that it was designed around gameplay instead of having gameplay designed around ships.
The drake way
>designed around gameplay
Tell me what kind of gameplay should make cargo trader abandon his cargo and "escape to safety" in an escape pod ))) Just describe it )
@@alexpetrov8871 having actual weight to your character dying...... If dying has consequences then you are better off abandoning your cargo than sticking around to possibly or more than likely die.
@@alexpetrov8871 What Steven said. It is impractical to hold onto a ship and its cargo just to die with it, especially when death means the loss of more than just your cargo and ship in the future. With that said; Ironclad is designed around current and future gameplay.
A lot of the older ships and vehicles were designed at a time when the vision of the game was less clear, the specifics not ironed out, and a lot of the systems required for today's gameplay wasn't even developed. A lot of things back then were theoretical, and it's coming back to bite them in the ass since they have to focus development time to bring everything up to spec now that they're getting a much better idea of how to bring this game to life.
The Ironclad is undoubtedly a step in the right direction because of these reasons. It also serves as a stepping stone towards a Hull C for cargo haulers, or alternatively; as a pocket carrier for snub fighters or as a b-tec medical ship loaded with either Ursa Medivacs and/or C8Rs.
@alexpetrov8871 death of a spaceman
Finally a ship designed with manual cargo loading in mind.
lol Mike said it they finished cargo refactoring and this is the first cargo ship after that so yeah it’s way better designed for it
I love how the designers learn the value of utility because gameplay mechanics demand it
It’s just like how a bunch of RSI cockpits had to be remade once we went from hangars to open space and flying the ships around
Def a Pirate backed company, lol
In the original lore for the hull C is this Ironclad, a armored box, that would hold about anything and is the most popular heavy freighter in the verse.
It's going to be interesting to see ships 3-4 years from now just being inherently better than anything previous regardless of SCU or amount of guns. Just because they were designed with ___ in mind.
ah yes we will put "cargo" in the totally not a pocket carrier hanger.
@@the_babbleboom No they won't, u can just put a pisces in a c2 and they never complained about that either. They even said ship in the video implying you can put a ship in it.
Some of the pictures looks like there’s a support beam going across the middle of the top so if that doesn’t move as some kind of loading crane it might be limited what will fit.
@@the_babbleboom its drake.. so that pretty much a pirate ship, they couldn't stop people from putting snub fighters in the catapilar what make you think they will on this one?
@@the_babbleboom they've shown a pisces on it, bet they want it to be a pocket carrier.
@@the_babbleboom wait but you can slip furys in almost all cargo ships, i dont think they restrict as much as you do
"i will not be that dummy" *spongebob narrator: 2 seconds later* "okay how much?" lmaooooooo
Start of video: "I WILL NOT BE THE DUMMY"
End of Video: "I'm just gonna melt all my C series ships cause what's the point. I'm not gonna buy it, I'm just curious."
Glorious
I have $800 in store credit atm
😂@@saltemikereacts
@@saltemikereactsdoing that backer math
Welcome to the Faterpillar!
So i guess everyone wants to nickname it the Faterpillar lol 😀
@@Orrin_Hawke yess
Catmax!
Mike already swiped the credit card by the end of the video haha!
It's not for sale yet
@@SpaceDad42
Bro...
We know...like..who are you?
@xBloodXGusherx that's spaceDad42, an absolute legend. Who tf are you?
@@warmonger165
Silence. No talking pls. Ty.
in 5-10 years when it comes out I'll pick it up.
Considering they showed actual model shots maybe it won’t be more than a year?
Its more than 3 years away.
Even at that it will still be out before the BMM ugh
It's likely they'll be focusing on Drake next year. How we see RSI this year with the Polaris being flight ready at IAE, this and the Kraken can be flight ready by end of next year (not so much the Kraken).
@@Mgl1206 If I'm being extremely optimistic, based on how things seem to tend to work, if they have enough assets to where they spend minimal time having to make more stuff I'd put it around 1-1.5 year mark. As it's just a large bay mostly, and the command module is practically the Cat's and it reminds me of the Kraken, which we know they got at least some assets for. Though it really depends on what they choose to prioritize as that's what keeps nipping BMM owners and other such "forgotten" ships. But as they are about to rehash cargo and they are about to release 4.0 which will likely bring in a surge of players, they might put it on the high priority list. And Drake is a popular ship style that fits perfectly in Pyro. Again, this is me being highly optimistic. If I were to be reasonable, I'm guessing 2-3 years. If I go full doom mode but still accept that it will come out 4 tops.
The Drake team has nothing else to do because the Kraken is in the fridge.
Man I hope so. Drake seems to be pumping out ships. We got the vulture, the 20 cutter variants and now this. My favorite ship mfg
Thank God, I love drake and will welcome every drake I can get
For me, this ship is the perfect target to earn it by buying such a ship for ingame money, not real money. Imagine the journey of a solo player who starts the game in a humble Cutter, completes missions, makes friends among other players, finally buys a Cutlas, starts the first missions with one or two friends, expands his activities to destroying and looting smaller transport ships, finally buys corsair or caterpillar to earn even more money by looting enemies or trading (depending on which ship you choose). Finally, he earns Ironclad, and sets off with his team to Pyro, using this ship as a mini carrier. I would prefer the military variant, because I don't really see myself doing it in an even larger ship, so pure cargo runs will be not neccesery to earn huge amounts of money to buy a kraken. For me, an Ironclad or Liberator is total endgame.
Ironclad and Perseus are the 2 big 'earn in game' ships for me (the latter especially)
More concept debt. They need to have a hard sit down and balance the concept budget.
In the end drawing a picture and making millions up front is just too appealing until they have to pay someone to make it
@@saltemikereactsthis has two foundational tech elements though, so its more likely to come out soon. Armor and detachable cockpit module.
@@chrismcdonald5775 the deepest COPE.
@@MontySaurusRex_ not cope at all. That's based on how alpha dev works and CIGs track record. I hate CIG for the most part, definitely not coming to their defense.
They will "balance" this ship by drawing a better jpg in 2028 :D
Thanks for the laughs, seeing you melt on camera as you saw the ship was hilarious.
This really is the entire range of human experience, compressed into one reaction video.
love your reaction, it's strange to see how they show pictures making it look much better then C2 feeling current ship almost outdated and then they add comment it has roof for protection as if it was a hint that liberator doesn't and is protected by only shield... and yet liberator is still not in game, caterpillar still missing modules but another transport ship is on sale... if they will keep going path where new ship is better then old one or the old concept that isn't even released that is called powercreep in other games so it won't be possible to balance it and it looks like they are going this route with every sale powercreeping old ships
C2 is a 3 man ship, probably flies better in atmo and is more fuel efficient, and probably has benefits to ground unloading with the second ramp over the Ironclad.
I mean they could just be getting better at making and designing ships, also it's easier when you have more of the game mechanics fleshed out when you design these things. which the CAT didn't have the luxury of
They bleeped out, "Drake Cash Grab" and inserted Ironclad assault
They said they'll release videos (UNTIL) the next patch comes out
The only reason why its gameplay is for cargo and combat because that's all they have to offer for content
It kind of reminds me of the Canterbury from The Expanse.
Remember the Cant!
I am 70 years old and I honestly doubt I will live long enough to see this ship make it into the game.
This competes with the Anvil Liberator. The liberator can carry more ships vehicles but is less gunned and has some vehicles exposed up top. I’m guessing the Ironclad requires more of a crew. The military variant offers a repair facility and more guns.
The Liberator it says only 2 crewmen, but its concept is for a sort of assault/landing ship space-to-land to deploy vehicles after the first wave of atrack and these vehicles got their own crews.
@@Haegemon it’s tempting for me to get a CCU. But my initial impression is if the military variant offers a repair facility it’s a buy. I’m ok with a larger crew. In my opinion the liberator has a more efficient design.
@@artsolano6762 Yes, I lost count of how many times I got tempted. 😅
Because I'm not going to create an Org, finally I made the decision to start small with single pilot ships and join an Org that owns the big ones.
I’m sorry for the caps but WE DONT EVEN HAVE MASS-CARGO RUNNING MISSIONS YET
This video has me pulling the Vince McMahon gif where he goes through elevating levels of "surprise" and falls out of his chair.
Maybe some day they'll spend the same effort and time into making the world as varied and detailed as they do these ships.
All bunkers still look practically the same, most space stations look practically the same, most locations outside of major cities look pretty much the same. Maybe divert some the 3d art team to put the same variety into existing buildings and locations as they do to ships.
I can only hope we see an increase in bunker tilesets when 4.0 comes, would be weird to go around pyro and have repeats of the same two or three pyro sets.
Function over form during testing would be a legitimate excuse, also the entirety of Stanton is reusing the same tileset, if every system would feel distinct by having them be bound to their own distinct styles so you can recognise what system you're in by just looking around
@@PvtDamion Function over form would be an excuse, although not legitimate at all, given the extent and diversity of ships they have added. You don't need 140 ships if you are concern with testing.
I want the Ironclad so bad but I learned my lesson with my Perseus. Cant wait to get it when its live!
must be awesome for the people that bought the Liberator (a ship i really really want) to see another big concept ship in the works....... do not! buy! concepts! learn..! :)
Not for nothing... the Mule should have a tractor beam for loading being the forks are useless. 😢
How to make the ironclad, take command module of caterpillar, copy and paste, take caterpillar engine copy and paste times 3 and scale up by 50%, draw square box insert assets and design tractor beam bridge
I imagine of you buy it you would get a c2 or caterpillar loaner
I really wish they would halt production on new ships until the game is released...
I'm tired of new ships being introduced while we still wait on ships from years ago, some of which we paid $2500 for??
*Pledged
No, this ship is coming with 1.0 lol unless they start on all Drake ships when RSI is finished
Not even then. Not even close to then.
They said that ISC would not take a quarterly break until after 3.23 launched. This doesn't breach that promise.
It's crazy that we have normalised it being a "Better deal" while still in concept. 100's or 1000's of dollars for a digital ship
why not developing kraken could help develop ironclad? hahah
Ship looks amazing! This is from a Drake hater…
I wish the pilot was centered at the ship and not the left side but whatever there is always third person view.
Business as usual: snatch the cheapest CCU you can get for credits and then melt it in buyback.
It won't change price for years, until news of "we are working on it" start creeping out. Even then it snot guaranteed they are actually doing something (600i).
One caveat: it's a 6crew minimum ship with little to no automation. Buy a Liberator instead if you don't have great Org plans.
Ironclad is probably the best all-rounder ship, Cargo, pocket carrier, Salvage/Mining mothership, search rescue repair and so much more. The secure cargo room looks like an armory/brig to me . This is one of the most flexible ships, as far as gameplay loops. It's a Liberator on steroids. I really like this one, just have to figure how to get it. It will cost more than the Liberator IMO.
Where's the Kraken from 2013? The Odyssee? the Liberator? The Javelin? SM is right; this new Drake cargo hauler is 3-4 years down the road possibly longer.
So more of a backlog of large ships. Where is the Galaxy and Arrastra?
So this is what pays to make them…what pays to make this?
Lol the ironclad military version replace and outclass at the sametime : 2 hercules, 1 liberator and 1 valkyrie... CIG said they dont want meta ship....2024 is game changer really
I saw your chat already correct you, but for anyone who missed it, Jared said that they would not take a break until the release of each quarterly patch, not that they would never take any breaks. TL;DR he didn't lie, they're doing exactly what they said they were going to do.
@SaltEMike C2 will fly better in space and atmo, is cheaper in fuel, is faster. That's their selling point I think.
90% of the things they are talking about being able to do in and with the Ironclad is just as concept as the physical ship.
I've already watched the episode and I normally don't care about reaction videos that much but the opportunity to see SaltEMike melt more and more with each second of the Ironclad aka Fatterpillar presentation was too good to miss out on XD Pure joy!
I'll get one, but it's gonna be with credits. I'm not going to give them any more money, I'm in for a enough as it is. Recent decisions made by CIG just leave me wondering what the F is actually happening.
If I was rich I would make a response video for CIG showing them concept art of a big pile of money that I have for them, and then say that the money is "a work in progress" on and "not quite ready for release yet" but they should get the money at a future point in time which may or may not be soon(tm).
I'm glad I never bought one of those fairly expensive warbond C2 CCUs. I was never going to like a Crusader ship as much as Drake anyway.
To me it looks like a smaller liberator. BIIIIIIG square ship thats mostly cargo space inside. Its the DRAKE version of the liberator
Wait...they expect players to manually load the torpedos one by one using a tractor beam?! I'm sorry but that's awful game design.
Do you really think version 1.0 is within 2 years? If so then something is very, very wrong. The game needs at least a year of bug fixing alone to get it ready for a live full release.
I love your react to the Ironclad. As for the content break, they definitely said that they WOULD be taking a break after major patches this year.
be industrialist players are irresistible to Drake and Argo concept ship Mike i know how it feels, hold the line and get it in-game compare it to the liberator anything to make it down price, hold the line i trying so hard right now
Yall remember when folks spent $50,000 plus on NFT’s and digital currencies that were pump and dumps.
I'll buy anything after I can actually test fly it. NEVER BEFORE.
NO TRUST toward CI
... Looks like a flying(GPU) 4090 😂 .... Another thing I won't be buying
These are the ahips you should work towards why would you buy it now, to me i makes no sense. I want it too btw. But for ingame money only!
CIG: retractable roof
SaltEMike: all right, just tell me how much it costs.
Expectations: i am strong, i will NOT buy it
Reality: a second mortgage isnt that bad right?
I, in full consciousness, will be THAT dummy!
yea i would look forward to start small and move up and try to buy this ship in game. Dont start with it, earn it.
They can't even finish the Hull C that is already ingame imagine concept ships LMAO
Do I like the Ironclad? Yup. But will I ever own or fly one? Nope. Wallet is safe.
Mikes over here clutching his pearls the whole video 😂. Don’t worry Mike, me too
How many tie fighters, i mean furys can one fit inside? Just asking for a friend.
I wouldn't want the Kraken yet, we don't have the features. It would just be a huge Reclaimer claw that needed to be redone.
This will be out well before the Kraken, indeed this MUST come out before the Kraken, it will help making the Kraken easier. Two variants, the Cargo and the Assault versions.
lol, you actually bought that?
Bro is staying negative to protect wallet-kun 😂😂😂
How many furys can one fit inside? Just asking for a friend.
I'm not a drake fan or a cargo hauler, and I wanna buy it
This will be the base design/style for the Kraken.
So i guess, after the RSI ships, Drake will be the next
That is exactly what they want you to think. Clever innuendo only.
the just need to focus on the others not adding more and more
Given that the Banu Merchantman (BMM) first went on sale in 2013, and considering that today is 2024, it has been approximately 11 years and still waiting, so don't get your hopes up that ironclad is coming out anytime soon😢 big tease.
I definitely made this ship in starfield. 😂
i cant wait for my Jet Propelled Brick to be introduced in the PU just to watch Get Wrecked by the Polaris😂
"I might be that dummy." LololoL 😂
don't forget....you will need a crew.
4 tonks in the Irinclad while it has its roof open... at least 2 of the 4 should be able to shoot.
Ballistas - missiles will be easier to lock/fire/forget.
My man you gotta learn how to get thrifty with CIG. If you know its not coming for a long time you get the cheapest CCU possible till it comes out, so you keep the WB concept savings, but spend near to nothing. Then all ya need is an LTI token to make it when you want.
Care to explain a bit more on that one?
Not sure to follow exactly.
Thank you!
@@Vysp3r basically playing the long game with CCU's, my go to right now is either the Crucible or the Starliner, things that will get a big bump in price later on to purchase ships like the Ironclad.
Another tactic is buying these warbonds throughout the year, can save you anywhere from 100 bucks and beyond.
Them: the Polaris is a multi crew capital ship
Me: the Polaris is gonna be my very military and expensive cargo trader or it’s gonna be manned by AI. Take your pick
Still waiting for 3 other jpegs
This looks like a Starfield design
Bro, Drake is just BETTER!
so its a carg.... i mean carrier ship
I’m so tired of concepts….
Mike and i on the same wavelength. I said in my head “bs” moments before he paused and said the same 😂
They never said they weren't taking breaks. They said they were doing videos until patch release then taking their hiatus, instead of the usual 10 videos then hiatus.
Thanks for this. I agree. I'm starting to get annoyed at the finger-pointing AND TRYING TO "CATCH THEM OUT" comments; they are proving themselves, yes we have had a rough past, but they seem focused and are delivering! we have had more ISCs and SCLs so far this year and still no one is happy; let them start prepping the 4,0 content. Here is the actual comment from WIR "Thanks Jake and hi all! ISC and SCL are coming back on February 1st/2nd this year and I wanted to take a few moments to talk about a change in our scheduling for 2024 that reflects the ongoing changes to our development in what promises to be the biggest year yet for Star Citizen.
While we're still going to be releasing on Thursdays and broadcasting LIVE on Fridays, we are no longer going to be programming on the standard quarterly cadence we've used since ISC began, which has been a pretty rigid ten weeks on, three weeks off, rinse and repeat sort of affair. In this new year of exciting challenges and anticipated releases, once ISC comes back on February 1st, it will continue to run until 3.23 comes out, however many weeks that may be. We'll then take a week or two off and come right back with the ongoing cadence until the next major patch comes out, and so on and so on.
What this means for you is that we'll no longer be cutting away to our hiatuses a week or two before the patch releases like we've done in the past, and there may be a week or two in the middle of a month where we don't publish/broadcast so we can still take care of the important maintenance tasks we normally do during the prior hiatuses, but most importantly the way our new schedule works out, it means there will now be more episodes of ISC produced this year than previously, covering more topics and more aspects of our lives in game development than ever before, and everyone here on the ISC Team is excited to tackle the added challenge."
Yea but they also said those breaks would be shorter no? I knew I was surprised by the 4 weeks thing
Yeah I guess so, it wasn’t you so much, and I agree we need to keep them accountable, but the flood of hate from chat was enough for me, I think CIG are really trying, but.. time heals all wounds as they say.
I COMPLETELY forgot about the expanse
Before 1.0? Haha no
Cig advertising more fake imaginary ships that won’t appear in game for decades just to get a bunch of money. It’s just scummy behaviour.
The f'd up my inferno I'm pissed.
😭
I'd rather start with a connie and enjoy the gameplay to get bigger ships than buy the biggest in the game before its even released.
*Slaps roof* - This bad boy can fit so many Nursas in it!
You want 50 furrys, you got it
Interesting that they want to upgun the Polaris. Right now it has a single turret with dual size 5s, 3 turrets with 2xS4, and 3 PDW turrets, 1 remote 2 manned, with 4xS3 guns. This is compared to the Idris and Kraken who have mostly 2xS5 manned turrets, at least 4 or so each I think, and 4 2xS4 PDWs each.
Not sure whether 4xS3 or 2xS4 is better for shooting down fighters and torpedoes, but I assume their intention to upgun would mean upgrading the secondary battery turrets to S5 and the nose gun to S7? It seems small cap ship and large subcap ships tend to use S7s as a main battery (perseus, Nautilus, Kraken) and S5s for secondary batteries or primary battery on ships that provide utility (Liberator, Galaxy, Odyssey, Idris, Kraken). The Hammerhead is unique with all quad S4 but it's a screening ship to shoot down fighters and torpedoes its PDW with engines, basically.
So TL;DR, I think, when they talk about upgunning, that they plan to make the nose turret 2xS7 and the 2 top turrets 2xS5. They may leave the side turrets 4xS3, I think it makes sense, but they very well could be upgraded to 4xS4. It still ends up with half the secondary battery as a Kraken and a third that of the Idris, though it would have the same PDW firepower on half the turrets, but still much less than the Hammerhead, and its main turret would match the Kraken and Nautilus but half that of the Perseus. Considering the 28 torpedoes, that would be a pretty aggressive loadout.
Large multi-crew ships are essentially digital collector items until CIG implements crew ship bed logouts or last point in session (LPS) logouts. Spending an hour or more for a crew to gear up just to fully realize the ship's use isn't appealing to many players, including large orgs. An LPS feature needs to be in the game before or at least by 4.0. Instead of developing more large ships, focus on fixing persistent glitches and improving gameplay quality. By doing this, CIG can increase player engagement and satisfaction, leading to greater revenues when new ships are introduced. That said, I personally like the concept of the IronClad - it looks AWESOME!
I understand how this ship will truly excite some people, but I'm sadly not feeling it, not even a little. The cargo space might be there from the art, but I don't think it can effectively hold multiple ships. To add some color to that statement, people might envision this as a pocket carrier, but unless it can repair OR house the repair ship simultaneously, no bueno. Also, the bigger the ship gets, the less practical the "Millennium Falcon" off-center flight deck makes sense. Landing and flight navigation in 3rd person will probably be used a LOT. If people like the aesthetic of the ship, then grand. Enjoy! However, "wobbly flying box" is basically my assessment.
Now, if the military version has a repair facility - awesome, but ... how much cargo do you lose? Might be worth a warbond CCU, maybe. However, I don't think they are selling the military version this go-around. We'll see...
Fatterpillar, IronChad, Cuttypillar, Thickapillar, IronLass, Sold. Any name works for me, especially the last. Edit: laughing my ass off as Mikes willpower crumbles and dissolves at the whitebox state. (no judgement, I didn't even make it past the top-down view😋)
I love the concept of the Ironclad and I'm looking forward to it's release. However, I'm not going to buy it until the information on it is more stable. I've bought several ships in concept and so far, I haven't been too disappointed. The Ironclad needs to be exactly how it's presented. However, I stand by this point. I have only purchased ships at full price on the smaller end of the scale. Less than $100 max, usually in the $40 to $50 range. I look specifically for LTI opportunities. I understand the thoughts on LTI, but I hedge my bets and it really costs nothing extra. After that, I can incrementally upgrade. I've been doing this since I started pledging in 2012. Currently, if I wanted the Ironclad, I could upgrade to it, with LTI, for less than $50 and not put a dent in my fleet. That has taken a long time to build up to, but it has had a negligible impact on my day to day budget. DON'T buy the larger vessels at full price, ever. This is a game. It's an intangible hobby that disappears with internet service. It's basically a replacement for a soda/cigarette addiction if you aren't cautious.
I will be that dummy, I nominate myself as tribute!!! Shut up and take my money!!!! Prepare to mash that Buy button. This will come before launch, I reckon they’ll push this out pretty quickly (1 or 2 years) as they need it for the kraken. I genuinely think they are keeping a lot more close to their chests atm and are a bit further along with some ships and systems etc then we know. I’m saying $450, caterpillar is $325 and hull C is $550. Liberator is $550 and seems like it’s close competitor but with more scu
I think they only ever said they wouldn’t take a break until 3.23 releases. Not after that. Think the original video they stated it in said they’d have a break afterwards and then start the next series till 4.0
In my head i'm screaming Faterpillar
TODAY I WILL BE THE HATER FOR MIKE!! 😎
They do way too much ship selling. The reality of this is kinda making me sad and sick. How many backers have passed without the chance to even touch their ship. How many backers have given up hope for a decent test alpha server. How many…
They funnel new players in with graphics and big interiors. At this point an you can see this evidence for yourself. Most new players are buying starter packs and ships thinking this is some early access style game. Which it’s not even a game yet. To sell something that’s not finished at this point with a definitive timeline is crazy. (regarding to the ship in the video.) CIG doesn’t need anymore money. People will still spend of course but i need everyone to understand. After 14 years of a little here a little there this is all they have to show. A few feature complete ships. A few ships that don’t have a gameplay loop. An a few ships that can be pulled from your hanger but you need to pray to Chris Roberts an order to make it to orbit. Because they refuse to go back to fix older ships. Concepts and an okayish 3.23.1. we still don’t know if server meshing will work properly the first time come 4.0! This rant isn’t about if the game is real or not though. It’s about predatoral pricing and respect for backers/testers. This title wouldn’t be here without the backers. I’ve been in the know with SC since 2017 but the ones that made this happen was their since day one. So much has changed! Things have been cut and some ships that they promised way back when still aren’t out. What I want to say is CIG needs to do something big for the backers. They owe it too the whales and the ones that we’re dedicated to seeing this project come to fruition. Time and Money spent on this IP needs to be appreciated and they haven’t done that once. They have closed info that was able for all to see though. They have hiked prices so FOMO hits people like Mike Tyson coming from the floor up though. It’s just straight garbage. You preyed and promised to your community a lot of things in the beginning for money so your company could build a game but not yet have they gave back to the community and that is the problem I have. It’s scummy and inconsiderate especially since a large part of the community have been more then patience with CIG. Yet they give us delays and excuses while they sit in there newly built offices funded by you all! 😃
As for the yellow text around 55sec
Jared made a pro Drake kinda joke or something.
The video was recorded before the Kendrick Lamar (KDot) « beef » with Drake.
Disco is probably the dude that foresees the videos before they are pushed to UA-cam.
He is pro KDot
He decided to insert the yellow text.
That’s my guess.