Why Upgrade to Intel Core Ultra?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @Molo87
    @Molo87 Місяць тому +3

    Great stuff 👏👏

  • @ryanknauf1486
    @ryanknauf1486 Місяць тому +4

    Really opened my eyes with its capability

    • @Streamsight
      @Streamsight  Місяць тому +2

      Really great, especially for streaming!

  • @HaliosTV
    @HaliosTV Місяць тому +3

    I would literally watch an hour long video on you explaining all these processes. I feel like I just took a master class and actually understand it all. Bravo

    • @Streamsight
      @Streamsight  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks so much Halios! Really appreciate that, absolutely made my day!

  • @Realmadridnewstt
    @Realmadridnewstt 25 днів тому

    Intel is balanced at this point editing and gaming

  • @tbirdboy
    @tbirdboy Місяць тому +1

    Just ordered an ASUS NUC Pro+ with this Ultra 9 chip. Looking forward to seeing what I can do with it.

  • @mikeinal5521
    @mikeinal5521 Місяць тому +19

    Intel advertisement.

  • @pascalgmusic
    @pascalgmusic Місяць тому +6

    There are tasks for which you should choose Intel. The told tasks aren‘t one of these. It shows badly that this is influencer crap. So if you are streamer, gamer, and 90% of other PC users, take the latest AMD chips.

  • @302efi
    @302efi 15 днів тому

    Lol.. it's all free, gifted parts 🤣🤣

  • @AbirZenith
    @AbirZenith Місяць тому

    is this what they call UGC creator content ?

  • @Wooksley
    @Wooksley Місяць тому +3

    More like downgrade...

  • @HDJess
    @HDJess Місяць тому

    It's not a good generation, not worth "upgrading" to 200 series. Sure, there are efficiency improvements, but not enough performance gains over the 14th gen. Maybe the 300 series will be better.

  • @0perativeX
    @0perativeX Місяць тому +5

    Why upgrade to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? Don't. It's that simple. Intel's previous 14th gen CPU's perform better. It's a downgrade. And AMD's Ryzen 7 9800X3D beats it in 95% of benchmarks and it's slightly cheaper. Intel dropped the ball hard and it is costing them big time.

    • @arthur_pd
      @arthur_pd Місяць тому +2

      dude, have u watch the benchmarks other then gaming?? Yes, AMD does beat it at gaming, but for work loads/product/streaming, etc, intels wins in these parts, watch productivity benchmarks, almost 9 out of 10, intels win at this side. For 14th gen vs core ultra, sure we can debate which to get as these two are almost tie, but for me if wasn't using an AMD CPU now, i rather get the core ultra CPU's due lot less power usage vs the 14th gen

    • @MrMotor11
      @MrMotor11 Місяць тому

      you're comparing an apple to an orange. The core types are designed to produce AI imagery and various editing / creativity power. If you're only into gaming you shouldn't even be here.

    • @0perativeX
      @0perativeX Місяць тому

      @@MrMotor11 XD

    • @MrMotor11
      @MrMotor11 28 днів тому

      @@0perativeX Hopefully laughing at yourself because the processor was never marketed as the next big gaming CPU. Yet, all the reviewers bashing it making themselves look stupid. There's a reason Core I-series and Ultras are on the market at the same time. Different purposes.

    • @0perativeX
      @0perativeX 28 днів тому

      @@MrMotor11 I would laugh at myself if i bought an Arrow Lake CPU considering 14th gen Raptor Lake is better XD

  • @chasekilleen1459
    @chasekilleen1459 28 днів тому

    I'd rather go AMD lmao

  • @Diamond_Hanz
    @Diamond_Hanz Місяць тому

    Intel to $69 in 2025