The Most Insanely Armored German Sea Threat Since WW2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 тра 2024
  • In the shimmering late-morning heat, a German F126 frigate prowls the turquoise waters of the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia on the hunt for pirates as part of the European Union’s Operation Atalanta. The vigilant crew of the biggest surface warship to join the German Navy since World War 2 carefully scans the horizon for any signs of trouble, all too aware that this turbulent stretch of sea is crawling with modern-day buccaneers.
    As the sun climbs higher, the ship’s lookout suddenly spots a suspicious skiff darting between merchant vessels, her occupants masked, armed, and clearly up to no good. This dangerous gang of seaborne delinquents must be stopped before an innocent ship falls victim to a violent hijacking.
    Fortunately, the F126 is on the case. The roar of the 545-foot long frigate’s engines is soon joined by the whirring blades of a pair of NH90 Naval Frigate Helicopters, slicing through the salty air as they lift off from the deck, where an expert team hurriedly prepares the Rigid Hull Inflatable Boats, gearing up for a boarding operation.
    Using her state-of-the-art Hensoldt TRS-4D NR multi-function surveillance radar, the F126 tracks the pirates’ every move, the helicopters hovering above like dragonflies while the inflatable boats race toward their target. Panic fills their eyes as they realize they have been detected, and the skiff’s crew attempts a desperate getaway, but the EU forces are rapidly closing in. As the chase intensifies, the two sides prepare for a fierce confrontation on the high seas.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 205

  • @StEvEn-dp1ri
    @StEvEn-dp1ri Місяць тому +18

    She's a sleek good-looking boat.

  • @user-bv6vu8it3z
    @user-bv6vu8it3z 9 днів тому +9

    Germany: releses island sized ship with planes helicopters tank factorys ICBMs and hundrets of canons
    German navy officer: hmmm thats a nice little destroyer

    • @SargeRho
      @SargeRho 9 днів тому +6

      *frigate
      Next up: Supercarriers, but we'll call it a Flight Deck Frigate.

  • @Badger13x
    @Badger13x Місяць тому +16

    Where's your Buccaneers ...... underneath me bucking hat !

    • @StephenGresser
      @StephenGresser Місяць тому +1

      🌎 Excellent 3rd Rock reference, Badger13x!

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 Місяць тому +10

    The Arleigh Burke Class flight III are almost 10,000tons. The Burkes also have over twice the shaft horsepower so are considerably faster. Finally the Burkes are far more heavily armed with 90 or 96 VLS modules vs 16 on F126.

    • @DaveSCameron
      @DaveSCameron Місяць тому +4

      Nein

    • @enterring9874
      @enterring9874 15 днів тому

      Uahhh we simply make the best FRIGATES so stop talking about a destroyer

    • @matthewhuszarik4173
      @matthewhuszarik4173 15 днів тому +2

      @@enterring9874 You know there is no concrete criteria what makes a ship a cruiser, destroyer, frigate, destroyer escort, corvette and what size ship is in each criteria has changed drastically over time. Each nation choses what to call their war ships and there is considerable overlap. The US Ticonderoga class cruisers were originally classified as guided missile destroyers and they were built on the same hulls as the Spruance class guided missile destroyers. Then US Congress reclassified them as cruisers.

    • @aggravated_assault
      @aggravated_assault 5 днів тому

      Its an air defense destroyee so of course it will have more vls

    • @Spendingryan
      @Spendingryan День тому

      ​@@matthewhuszarik4173I think the only true cruisers and battle cruisers left are the Russian Slava and Kirov class cruisers, they are pretty big but very old and look unique, there aren't too many of them left, especially because of recent events.

  • @jonny2954
    @jonny2954 Місяць тому +41

    Since these boats are a little underarmed for their size German engineers decided to go fully insane with the next one, F127.
    12,000 tons, 220 m length, 250 crew. 40 meters longer than a type 055 Chinese cruiser and more VLS cells than the South Korean Sejong the Great-class, making it the heaviest armed surface combatant after the Soviet Kirov class battlecruiser.
    It doesen't just meet destroyer criteria, but cruiser. And no, they're going to call it a _Frigate_ too. And they want five of them.

    • @donfully
      @donfully Місяць тому +14

      that's just the sales pitch from the manufacturer. The military will analyse and draw up its own requirement which likely gonna be another big coast guard ship disguised as a warship again

    • @leonschroeder4771
      @leonschroeder4771 28 днів тому

      Isn't the German navy banned from having destroyers since WW2? That would explain why all German ships are classified as frigates no matter what size

    • @HingerlAlois
      @HingerlAlois 24 дні тому +1

      @@donfully
      F127 is supposed to replace the Sachsen class air defense frigates, thus they are certainly going to be at least significantly better armed than the F125 and F126 classes…

    • @MakeSomeNoiseAgencyPlaylists
      @MakeSomeNoiseAgencyPlaylists 24 дні тому

      Actually that F-127 project is canceled by Germany...

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 24 дні тому +9

      @@MakeSomeNoiseAgencyPlaylists No it isn't.

  • @ThomasNux
    @ThomasNux Місяць тому +20

    Love your content... but this one felt a bit like a sales presentation when it started. All in all, I enjoyed it...

    • @killerbern666
      @killerbern666 Місяць тому

      all his videos are like that, its probably a military propaganda channel imo

    • @DaveSCameron
      @DaveSCameron Місяць тому

      It’s a phoney channel 😂😂😂😂

    • @Gunnl
      @Gunnl 8 днів тому

      most publicly available information from these systems are from sales presentations ...

  • @johngutwald8454
    @johngutwald8454 Місяць тому +7

    Being in an inflatable boat at sea during a gun fight doesn't sound like a good place to be. Am I missing something here.

    • @littlejimmy7402
      @littlejimmy7402 Місяць тому

      speed and maneuverability are sometimes the best armor. WW2 PT boats were wooden, it helped them go fast and fight much larger armored craft.

    • @johngutwald8454
      @johngutwald8454 Місяць тому

      @@littlejimmy7402 Inflatable boats must be the right way to go historically they've preformed the best. But wouldn't it make you a little apprehensive if you were getting into a boat in the middle of the ocean with a bunch of other guys all carrying sharp & pointed objects and moving a point where you're supposed assault it this type of action must have only been attempted under the cover of darkness because that's the only cover there is available. Kind of a scary thought huh?

    • @littlejimmy7402
      @littlejimmy7402 Місяць тому

      @@johngutwald8454 I fully get what you are saying. But, I have been in the U.S. Army and I will say that a group of well trained and motivated Soldiers (any military) can be surprisingly capable. And there's no telling how much fun those guys are having either.

    • @herbertrichardson3289
      @herbertrichardson3289 26 днів тому

      You missed something
      Maybe I'm wrong let me know
      LifeProof boats are filled with a foam

    • @r00kie36
      @r00kie36 14 днів тому

      @@johngutwald8454 RIBs are compartmentalised, and usually made from relatively tough fabric. So pointing wont do you much good, and to shoot you'd have to hit a lot of different areas to make all the compartments deflate. Still, it wouldnt sink because it has many foam pockets and due to its small weight those are enough to keep the deflated boat and any crew afloat until rescue arrives

  • @konradheumann8342
    @konradheumann8342 29 днів тому +4

    The dude narrating should learn how to pronounce the German word "Marine" [/mah-REE-nuh]. It's really not difficult, and avoids the inadvertent suggestion that Germany has Marines (it doesn't).

  • @DasIllu
    @DasIllu 19 днів тому +3

    Funny they named the ship Saarland while it wouldn't fit inside the Saarland.
    I live there, i should know 😀

  • @marcusharrigan6879
    @marcusharrigan6879 13 днів тому

    3 weeks at sea. I'm underwhelmed.

  • @dapple33
    @dapple33 Місяць тому +3

    With the changing paradigm of modern warfare, a more cost effective anti-drone system will be needed.

    • @trespire
      @trespire Місяць тому

      My thought too. Not only for naval forces but for land based a well.

    • @christophseidl1532
      @christophseidl1532 10 днів тому

      Couldn't they install a Mantis System or just park a Gepard on the heli pad?

  • @Hulkehnor
    @Hulkehnor 25 днів тому +3

    "The most Insanely Armored German Sea Threat Since WW2" Armored? Did you mean Armed?

    • @user-kd2ij7te5v
      @user-kd2ij7te5v 22 дні тому +1

      This is a workplace at sea, not a ammo depot. It has range and is highly adaptable. Deutsche Marine is thinking of advanced mission modules. The mission modules can change the capabilities quietly significantly.

    • @Hulkehnor
      @Hulkehnor 21 день тому +1

      @@user-kd2ij7te5v I'm not sure what you are saying. I was refering to the title of the video where he says "Armored", which means physical protection against penetration i.e. Steel plating. I think he meant to say "Armed" which is the amount of weapons it carries. I dont think any modern warship actually has armor plating anymore.

    • @mammutMK2
      @mammutMK2 18 днів тому

      ​@@Hulkehnor well...compared to most ships, you can consider the hull as armored. With such a high ice class she needs some massive steel plating to not get cut open or crashed by the ice.
      If there is a missile impact, the damage will be lower. Possible that she has the inner hull covered with Splinter protection.

    • @Hulkehnor
      @Hulkehnor 18 днів тому

      @@mammutMK2 The F126 has lowest level of ice protection classification of 1C. I'd be surprised if all European warships didnt meet this level anyway without being designed for it. Armor plating on warships was usually like a covered bathtub within the ship protecting the important systems like engines and ammunition magazines and on an equivalent sized ship in WW2 like a light cruiser would have been 80-130mm thick. The hardiest Icebreakers only have about 50mm thick plating at the bow.
      During the Falklands war the RN made a point of taking out the Argentinian WW2 built cruiser the General Belgrano with a submarine because they knew the veterans strong Armor was going to give their modern missiles trouble. Current warships play a game of long range sniping rather than the slugfest it used to be so dont have the same level of static protection.

    • @mammutMK2
      @mammutMK2 17 днів тому

      @@Hulkehnor I didn't looked the ice rating up...in that case i would think all northern European war ships have that rating, since ice in the Baltic and north sea in pretty common.
      If they would have given it the highest rating, even though 50mm is way less that actually WW2 armor, but compared to thin hull plating they use today you could call it armored.
      But why they are not armored? Because it's not much use...you get hit from a missile that was fired hundred miles away, so the focus is on not getting hit instead of taking the hit...the Iowa class was reactivated because they needed them for shore bombardment and she could get close to the shore, because land fired artillery would be no harm. Compared to a modern ship, getting hit by a artillery shell will make some serious damage.

  • @Rick_Zune
    @Rick_Zune Місяць тому +1

    Kinda looks like the big brother to Swedens Visby corvette

  • @T0ghar
    @T0ghar 13 днів тому +1

    The E in Marine is not Silent. German is not French. Only a few German words with foreign origin end on silent E's.

  • @wanderschlosser1857
    @wanderschlosser1857 Місяць тому +3

    Brandenburg has a singular propulsion system? 2 shafts with one Diesel and one GT each is singular? The 2 GT's got 38 MW together, that's more than the new F126 at less than half the tonnage and easily reaching 30+ knots. The F126 might not require such high speed due to its different mission portfolio but dude get your research data right!

  • @Gunnerman65
    @Gunnerman65 25 днів тому +1

    Frigates are becoming the "New" Destroyers...

  • @rael5469
    @rael5469 Місяць тому +2

    The Rolling Airframe Missile seems too small.......and not enough ammo in the launcher. How fast can they re arm the thing?

    • @GnomBoom
      @GnomBoom 15 днів тому +1

      they are basically the last defence against missiles similar to the phalanx ciws

    • @PagsPayback
      @PagsPayback 14 днів тому +3

      42 RIM-116 is not that bad. And Germans are using the latest Block 2b variant for the F126 which is more powerfull and has an impoved guidance system over the older block 1 missiles, which where already able to shoot down supersonic sea skimming anti-ship missiles at Mach 2.5(target speed).
      But the neat thing is, in contrast to VLS cells the deck launchers can be reloaded at sea.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 13 днів тому +1

      @@PagsPayback Cool. Thanks for the info. I'm glad to hear it.

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh Місяць тому +6

    What's a pirate's favorite letter?

    • @ricoolivier
      @ricoolivier Місяць тому +3

      Rrrrrrr...😂

    • @adrianhenle
      @adrianhenle Місяць тому +10

      @@ricoolivier You may think it be Rrrr but his true love be the C

    • @pezpengy9308
      @pezpengy9308 Місяць тому +1

      @@adrianhenle 🤣

  • @murder.simulator
    @murder.simulator Місяць тому

    What function does the flat panelling serve, other than decoration?

    • @_spooT
      @_spooT Місяць тому +1

      depends on what flat panel you're talking about

    • @murder.simulator
      @murder.simulator Місяць тому

      All along the sides

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому +5

      @@murder.simulator It is slightly angled to reduce the Radar Cross Section (RCS). The open decks with all the stuff hanging around on older ships, created a lot of 90° angles that bouncde the radar beam right back to the sender. This design makes it harder to detect the ship.

  • @lordinquis8r679
    @lordinquis8r679 Місяць тому +2

    The ship is sweet.

  • @icarus745
    @icarus745 28 днів тому +1

    I heard Saarland as Sauron 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Kriss_L
    @Kriss_L Місяць тому +1

    11,000+ tons? That's bigger than the US Aegis cruisers.

  • @shawnsmith5498
    @shawnsmith5498 Місяць тому +2

    Just watched We Dive at Dawn 1943. Their mission was to sink the Brandenburg

    • @Carl_ATHF
      @Carl_ATHF Місяць тому

      gross, zionist propaganda movies

  • @Carsten-yu6fe
    @Carsten-yu6fe 23 дні тому +5

    For it's size it's under armed

    • @xSoulhunterDKx
      @xSoulhunterDKx 12 днів тому +1

      cause its essentially a fob on the sea and a support vessel

    • @aggravated_assault
      @aggravated_assault 5 днів тому

      It should either have torpedo or another vls set bit its said that thier is eoom for more weapons on the ship

  • @embreis2257
    @embreis2257 6 днів тому

    important notice for all viewers: the first F126 frigate is expected to be commissioned into service in 2027! atm, we are in 2024 and this ship certainly hasn't been deployed yet anywhere. 🤭

  • @dellodas
    @dellodas 29 днів тому +1

    Loud music sound in some parts with a fast and unclear narrator voice !

  • @HeavilyCensoredKitty
    @HeavilyCensoredKitty Місяць тому +11

    Wanna really surprise the Pirates than build a reproduction ships from the heyday of Pirates and outfit it with modern weaponry to make them do a double take and say WTF...

    • @surters
      @surters Місяць тому +1

      Isn't a Dow just that? see Chinese pirats.

    • @HeavilyCensoredKitty
      @HeavilyCensoredKitty Місяць тому

      @@surters will research it but I mean like the old Gallions and those type of ships with Cannons.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      A reproduction of ships from the heyday of pirates? That is a ridiculous idea. I hope you were kidding.

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 13 днів тому

    I'm just going to say this, you should just let Black Water finish the pirate problem decades ago

  • @MCK3274
    @MCK3274 23 дні тому +1

    Only three weeks of supplies?

    • @matthiashartge5520
      @matthiashartge5520 19 днів тому +1

      That's what they can have on board. But usually warships are accompanied by supply ships that can transfer fuel, food etc while at sea to the war ship :)

  • @fakshen1973
    @fakshen1973 Місяць тому +2

    The word "also" loses its meaning if every sentence starts with it. You have to write these scripts on a level above a 2nd grade book report.

  • @molybdaen11
    @molybdaen11 18 днів тому

    And once again no mention of any armor.

  • @crocobaur5407
    @crocobaur5407 25 днів тому +3

    most under-gunned ship ever

  • @joncarolyn
    @joncarolyn Місяць тому +3

    Sounds heavy, slow and lacking firepower

    • @Freedom9X
      @Freedom9X 23 дні тому

      That's exactly what it is and also very expensive.

  • @Petriefied0246
    @Petriefied0246 Місяць тому +1

    12000 tonnes would make it a cruiser!

    • @streetwind.
      @streetwind. 24 дні тому

      Many modern navies are classifying their warships by purpose nowadays, not by tonnage... and sometimes even avoid certain appellations for political reasons.
      Germany commissions "frigates" because they are designed for defensive and patrolling duties and for asymmetrical warfare, which are traditionally in the frigate playbook. Germany does not commission "destroyers" because they're not planning to go destroy anyone, nor do they expect to need to deploy directly against other nation's warships.
      But yes, these things are massive by every other metric =P

  • @deth3021
    @deth3021 Місяць тому +3

    26 knots seems pretty slow for a destroyer....
    Also ask the lcs how they feel about combining gears.

    • @utubeo4r
      @utubeo4r Місяць тому +1

      frigate not destroyer

    • @shaun469
      @shaun469 Місяць тому

      Somehow i think the germans might be better at that

    • @protato911
      @protato911 Місяць тому +2

      also very under arm, consider the burks have 96 VLS cell, which is a smaller ships, the china type 52 can have 64 of bigger VLS, this ship only have 36. For its roll the size seem overkill and its didn't have the benefit of the usual larger ships (which is carry more weapon). Unless there are some international laws for arm limitation on naval ships that Germany need to follow, they could've arm the ship better or build more smaller but similar arm ships.

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому +7

      @@protato911 Armament is based on roles not on size and it is well armed for its role. It is a combination of General Purpose Frigate and Anti Submarine Warfare Frigate. It manly has to defend itself against sea skimming submarine launched missiles. For that it has 64 ESSM (4per VLS cell) and 42 RAMs. That is way more than for example the italian or French ASW FREMMs. The 2 medium Helicopters +1 Drone are more than most frigates can carry.
      More VLS Cells would only make sense if germany would adopt more weapon systems for those cells like Tomahawk or VL-ASROC.
      Most of the Size goes into the automation and redundancy for the intensive use concept. It can stay at sea for up to two years instead of constantly cruising back and forth from and to germany. Multiple crews rotate every 4 month.

    • @jonlaurenzreyes1902
      @jonlaurenzreyes1902 16 днів тому

      @@Chiggi0815 bruhh Israeli and Russian corvettes have more armament than this expensive and oversized Frigate.

  • @joshuadrumm1814
    @joshuadrumm1814 27 днів тому +1

    So its classified as a frigate, despite being larger than a destroyer

    • @Schokelmei
      @Schokelmei 18 днів тому

      German frigates were always bigger than the frigates of other Nato allies, because Germany (and Spain) don't have destroyers and there is no real measurement in those country what makes it a frigate vs a destroyer. So they just call them frigates.

    • @jonlaurenzreyes1902
      @jonlaurenzreyes1902 16 днів тому +1

      @@Schokelmei it's also political

  • @pauldegregorio6432
    @pauldegregorio6432 Місяць тому +8

    No Phalanx CWIS? Remember the F-4 Fantom?
    Sounds like a retrofit to me.

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому +5

      It uses RAMs as primary CIWS and the new MLG 4.0 are supposed to be CIWS capable too. In addition it is rumored that the design already has the hardpoints for future DEWs (laser; currently tested on F124 Class) Also rumored is that SeaSpider anti-Torpedo.Torpedo is to be integrated when it goes into production. (has alredy been tested by the german navy)

    • @surters
      @surters Місяць тому

      @@Chiggi0815 RAMs are nice, but like in WWII, now with drones, we will see that we need loads more of AA of different types. I think the Poles made a nice mini gun for just this.

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому +2

      @@surters That is what the 27mm MLGs are for, but the german navy is replacing those with 30mm Systems with airburst munitions on the F123 class soon. Probably as a testbed to transition the whole fleet from 27mm to 30mm ABMs later on.

    • @_spooT
      @_spooT Місяць тому

      Germany doesn't use the Phalanx. They have their own anti-air. And judging by how the main gun is designed, it prioritizes the smallest radar cross-section as possible. Right now it's armed with the RIM/RAM for anti-air. It looks like it can also be swapped with the Millennium

  • @Aeonshield
    @Aeonshield Місяць тому

    A date would be nice

  • @anewbisify
    @anewbisify Місяць тому

    Could you please slow down your cadence just slightly 😅 please and thank you ❤

  • @Lykapodium
    @Lykapodium Місяць тому +1

    Fyi: Thales is pronounced "Taliss"

  • @michaeldenesyk3195
    @michaeldenesyk3195 26 днів тому

    Do you mean Armed or Armored?

  • @HYNKZL
    @HYNKZL 21 день тому

    Lost me at low crewed and automated. LCS anyone

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron Місяць тому

    21 days😂😂😂😂😂

  • @kinngrimm
    @kinngrimm 22 дні тому

    Seeing how Ukrain manhandles the russian Navy, what will be any navy's defence against drone boats?

  • @danga55gan
    @danga55gan 14 днів тому

    would be nice if you spent half as much effort and vigor -
    towards protecting the maritime rights of the sumalis

  • @chigeryelam4061
    @chigeryelam4061 Місяць тому

    Well let's hope when they eventually get one in the water it floats straight unlike the F125 ;p

  • @MorningNapalm
    @MorningNapalm 22 дні тому

    I love the use of the exaggerated, Jeremy Clarkson "in the world" voice :D

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron Місяць тому

    Neil, Ze Hun are asist,

  • @oceanmariner
    @oceanmariner Місяць тому +4

    Click Bait again. The largest 'German' ship since WWII.

    • @AH-ve9iz
      @AH-ve9iz Місяць тому

      The other largest ship is up your mom's brown eye as I type this

  • @petercrossley1069
    @petercrossley1069 Місяць тому

    Stop saying “advancement”. The correct word is “advance”.

  • @terrystewart2070
    @terrystewart2070 Місяць тому

    All that high tech is just amazing.....right up 'til you really need it to work, and it decides "nope not today".....you know...kinda like virtually all high tech stuff does.

  • @bobmalooga7249
    @bobmalooga7249 Місяць тому +4

    why does his voice now sound like AI? I thought this guy was real :/

    • @persquad8998
      @persquad8998 Місяць тому +2

      Just cause his voice is monotone, does not mean that its AI. It's really annoying how people with no actual knowledge about how AI would sound, just assume things like that, but I guess these are the times we live in now.

    • @anthonysheppard9247
      @anthonysheppard9247 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@persquad8998he is now narrating every dark channel ,,he must be exhausted

    • @happychappy492
      @happychappy492 Місяць тому +1

      It is Ai

    • @anthonysheppard9247
      @anthonysheppard9247 Місяць тому

      @happychappy492 no its not

    • @happychappy492
      @happychappy492 Місяць тому +2

      @@anthonysheppard9247 yeah it is

  • @Zonker66
    @Zonker66 Місяць тому

    The music drowned out the voice too much. I couldn't finish watching.

  • @glennllewellyn7369
    @glennllewellyn7369 Місяць тому

    Ukraine rubbing hands...

    • @zenon7094
      @zenon7094 Місяць тому

      What warships did we Germans ceded to Ukraine so far?

  • @dotEXCEI_
    @dotEXCEI_ 12 днів тому

    She needs more weapons... She is bigger than a flight 2 burke but has less weapons...

  • @alfredchurchill2328
    @alfredchurchill2328 Місяць тому +2

    This channel and its sister channels are so cringey cheap. They do not even show the ship in question much. They just keep showing what looks like a Japanese or Australian AEGIS destroyer

  • @easygroove
    @easygroove Місяць тому

    ROFL - those Helicopters were forbidden to be flrown over Sea / Salt Water for some time 🤣😂🤣, Yeah Helicopters which wrere bought for Marine use...
    Will be interesting how good NATO Ships can deal with Sea based Drones like the British use under Ukraine disguise against Russian Ships...

    • @deliriumfranken
      @deliriumfranken Місяць тому +6

      I guess better than the Russian dilettants?

    • @easygroove
      @easygroove Місяць тому

      @@deliriumfranken 🤣

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому +2

      Well in the Red Sea they are intercepting them with helicopters long before they become dangerous.

  • @Heroesbleed
    @Heroesbleed Місяць тому +21

    They are not delinquents…..they are faithful Muslims.

    • @dahlmer1234
      @dahlmer1234 Місяць тому +42

      Oh please! They are criminals!

    • @Heroesbleed
      @Heroesbleed Місяць тому +4

      @@dahlmer1234 I encourage to study the Quran and Hadith. They find their justification therein.

    • @jmbaka007
      @jmbaka007 Місяць тому +6

      Let people know that and it is not Islamophobia

    • @adrianhenle
      @adrianhenle Місяць тому +22

      @@Heroesbleed I've never once seen an interview with a pirate where they claim they're a pirate because of Islam, just ones where they express that when choosing between piracy and starvation, one's moral compass doesn't see much use.

    • @Heroesbleed
      @Heroesbleed Місяць тому +6

      @@adrianhenle Let me understand you….if, and only if, a Muslim pirate declares in an interview that you can witness, that Islam is their motivation for piracy will you accept the claim that Islam allows and encourages Muslims to steal from non-Muslims?

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron Місяць тому

    Ich leibe der @AfD

  • @harrycarpenter1727
    @harrycarpenter1727 Місяць тому

    11,000 ton Frigate??

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 Місяць тому +1

      Just 10,550.
      However their next one will be 12,000 tons, 40 meters longer than a type 055 Chinese cruiser and heavier armed than the Sejong the Great-class, making it the heaviest armed surface combatant after the Kirov class battlecruiser.
      They're going to call it a _Frigate_ too.

    • @Chiggi0815
      @Chiggi0815 Місяць тому

      The idea that frigates are somehow small ships is a recent development. The original sailing frigates went on independent patrol/sea control missions called "cruising" and so they were called cruisers.
      When the sails were replaced by steam engines and the gun decks by turrets, the term "frigate" was dropped and all that remained was "cruiser".
      It was the British who started to call their "destroyer escorts" (light budget destroyers for convoy escort) frigates during WW2. Other nations followed that example, but not all. The US for example called their "light cruisers" (Destroyer Leaders) frigates. All those were bigger than their destroyers and more capable than most soviet cruisers. Some were even nuclear-powered.
      They changed the classification system in 1975 to make it more comparable to the soviets.
      Today the roles of frigates, destroyers and cruisers have molded together a bit since they all use the same systems and weapons for their tasks.
      A basic difference could be made by saying that cruiser/frigates are focused on independent sea control, while destroyers are focused on escorting important targets.
      Size is mostly just a question of logistical capabilities and needs.

  • @AH-ve9iz
    @AH-ve9iz Місяць тому +1

    Cmon where is the new Bismarck ir Tirpitz

    • @molybdaen11
      @molybdaen11 18 днів тому

      No new battleships planed for now.
      A lot of smaller ships with light helicopter or drones proved to be more efficient in a modern conflict where you have to be at many places at once.