The Hidden Deadly Sea Threat China Never Saw Coming

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 тра 2024
  • Beneath the surface of the Pacific Ocean, a silent battle for underwater supremacy is unfolding. As China rapidly advances its capabilities by producing dozens of sophisticated unmanned submarines carrying lethal ordnance and sophisticated sensors, a new contender emerges from the depths to challenge the balance of power.
    The Ghost Shark uncrewed submarine is Australia's answer to the growing underwater threat. This autonomous technological marvel is designed not just for exploration but as a critical piece of national defense, equipped to patrol, gather intelligence, and engage threats in ways previously imagined only in science fiction.
    With state-of-the-art stealth technology, advanced sensory equipment, and potential offensive capabilities, the Ghost Shark represents a significant leap in ensuring regional security against the rising red menace.
    Rumors of the Ghost Shark’s capacity to carry torpedoes for offensive operations and even serve as a mother ship to coordinate other uncrewed underwater vessels may turn the tide of the Pacific in the following months…
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 252

  • @scottlee7613
    @scottlee7613 26 днів тому +97

    Who believes Chinese will or already have altered commercial fishing boats with asymmetrical warfare and weapons like British ships in ww2 that acted like commercial but were totally military

    • @darenn71
      @darenn71 26 днів тому

      China lies about everything.

    • @TCW838
      @TCW838 26 днів тому +9

      That's a given.

    • @oculusangelicus8978
      @oculusangelicus8978 26 днів тому +10

      Of course this has happened but China is in for a truly rude awakening if they think that their boat or ships will not be taken any less seriously by western and allied nation Navies. Not only that but our Technological capability to be able to detect military grade radiation output from ANY vessel would easily make any modern Navy aware of the visual falsehood.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 26 днів тому +7

      We know they have.

    • @DrunkguyFawkes4
      @DrunkguyFawkes4 25 днів тому +2

      They already have with commercial ferry boats, they are built able to transport military weight vehicles. Why wouldn't they do the same with other ships?

  • @raymondevans205
    @raymondevans205 25 днів тому +14

    You showed so many subs that have nothing to do with topic I'm surprised you didn't show Seaveiw. Which fought drone subs on 70s TV.

  • @user-dd9tc4zz8j
    @user-dd9tc4zz8j 24 дні тому +11

    People need to understand that Australian is a huge continent with only 28m people, and a relatively small tax base. Put into perspective, that’s a population little more than greater London. People assume that just because it is a huge continent, that it also has a huge population. I saw a comment here that the poster could not understand why we weren’t a wealthier nation. I hope this puts some perspective to that question.

    • @mtebaldi1
      @mtebaldi1 23 дні тому +1

      The size of any country doesn't correspond to it wealth. The people who think otherwise are not paying attention to what is happening today. A good example is Israel for instance.

    • @howardwielhouwer3083
      @howardwielhouwer3083 22 дні тому +3

      Australia is a wonderful country with a rich and beautiful history. They are strong willed people, but there is very few people there. It’s a giant nation the amount of people like New York City in the entire country 90% of the people live in the big cities

  • @user-en9zo2ol4z
    @user-en9zo2ol4z 25 днів тому +23

    It is the RAN, the Royal Australian Navy, and not the Australian Royal Navy.

    • @flashgordon3715
      @flashgordon3715 11 днів тому

      Good to know

    • @paladro
      @paladro 2 дні тому

      which begs the question, why do criminals still recognize the crown?

  • @user-pl4pz2xn2c
    @user-pl4pz2xn2c 23 дні тому +14

    Designer1: "We need a totally stealth sub."
    Designer2: "Yeah it should be virtually invisible."
    Designer1: "What color should we paint it?"
    Designer2: "Rocket Red!"

    • @josephdelp87
      @josephdelp87 20 днів тому +2

      😊 the only thing it's a prototype painted that way so it's easier to find during testing. Live use will be black.

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      Yeah......like all prototype vessels......so we can see it 😂

    • @paladro
      @paladro 2 дні тому

      @@richardcostello360 guess you never tested anything before.

  • @HoboEAT
    @HoboEAT 25 днів тому +22

    NEVER underestimate your adversary.

    • @whereswaldo5740
      @whereswaldo5740 22 дні тому +2

      Ever

    • @RedRider1600
      @RedRider1600 15 днів тому

      Especially when you are a small weak country, unwilling to spend more than 2.3% of GDP on your military.

  • @carlguile2856
    @carlguile2856 25 днів тому +8

    Good on yah Oz!

  • @lizslilcorneroftheinstitution
    @lizslilcorneroftheinstitution 26 днів тому +10

    Great timing!

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 25 днів тому +23

    These videos always seem to be "padded" with a lot of repetition and generalized statements that don't contribute to the knowledge of the viewer.
    And some statements are questionable. Like for instance, I can buy that a UAV can operate at extreme depths, but to have longer duration than manned subs? Not likely. An atomic submarine (at the present time) requires a crew to maintain the powerplant. But in return it can operate submerged for months at a time. It is generally only limited by the food on board, since it can manufacture its own pure drinking water, oxygen, and electricity.
    The real drawback on the robot subs will be a limited power supply, and therefore range. The other difficulty will be communication while submerged.

    • @scottemery4737
      @scottemery4737 24 дні тому

      Dude, there are nuclear powered rovers driving around on Mars. Who does the maintenance on them?

    • @aarongbond03
      @aarongbond03 23 дні тому

      ⁠@@scottemery4737 radioisotope power system technically

    • @WorthTalking2
      @WorthTalking2 23 дні тому +1

      before even seeing your comment, I was thinking the same thing. It's the reason I'll occasionally sample a bit of one when YT recommends it to me, but I don't subscribe. I am especially interested in submarine tech, so I gave this one a chance.. even 7 minutes in, we're still just getting general statements reiterating how the navy will use these to bolster it's defensive capabilities. sheesh. YT channel called sub brief that makes posts on improvements to weapon tech that actually provides an interesting level of detail and analysis.... not just repetitive sensationalized bland statements.

    • @mughug9616
      @mughug9616 23 дні тому

      @@scottemery4737 Dude, it is an untested weapon system with a unique power source and basically the first of it's kind using significantly different technology in such an environment. Seems feasible that it may not be everything the PR sales pitch makes it out to be. Just look at the history of the Collins-class submarine to see how reality can rip apart all those nice sounding PR claims.

    • @thomasb5600
      @thomasb5600 20 днів тому

      If it is setting on the bottom of the ocean in a standby mode the amount of power it would be very little. We don’t know enough about the power unit it could make up 3/4 of it and it may not need to be powered up in full mode all the time when on a mission. A crewed ship would require power all the time. There is very little reason for it to surface.
      It is AI it should be capable of completing a mission by itself but if confirmation is required surfacing to receive an update.

  • @grip2617
    @grip2617 25 днів тому +5

    This video should last at least 15 minutes to slow down the presentator.

  • @anthonyschirillo4377
    @anthonyschirillo4377 24 дні тому +1

    These would seem to be a good option to use as an area denial system for Australia

  • @nedkelly9688
    @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому +5

    Ghost Shark uses the same Australian AI as Ghost Bat and is named Ghost Shark as a tirbute to Ghost bat. Stryx also uses it and is a VTOL AI helicopter to be a loyal wingman to Australian helicopters.
    Australia is going big in AI drones as realise a small population and not filling ADF roles.
    Have 20 AI M113A vehicles. supply trucks now running AI convoys. Arafura class patrol ship turned AI..
    Australian company also test fly a scramjet hypersonic drone in 300 days, might even beat USA hypersonic drones to fly first..

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      Australia is going balls to the wall with AI so we don't have to sacrifice our people in American wars 😊

  • @robot336
    @robot336 24 дні тому

    Outstanding

  • @daveanderson3805
    @daveanderson3805 26 днів тому +26

    China in the 21st century remains me of Japan in the 1930s

    • @user-qm8sc1jr9u
      @user-qm8sc1jr9u 26 днів тому +9

      not as smart

    • @dtddtd1
      @dtddtd1 25 днів тому +2

      @@user-qm8sc1jr9u Good, keep thinking that way.

    • @micklaws5520
      @micklaws5520 25 днів тому

      @@user-qm8sc1jr9u China has been in existence for thousands of years, their inventions would fill volumes. To discount them is stupidity of the highest order.
      “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”
      ― Sun tzu, The Art of War

    • @galatians-2.20
      @galatians-2.20 25 днів тому +3

      ​@@dtddtd1you tell him, sweetheart! Don't let that big bad man tempt you to get a Ding on your social credit score.

    • @oldguy7402
      @oldguy7402 25 днів тому

      And Russia is like the Italians. Inept at battle, few real gains. China has more industrial capacity and is as short as Japan on natural resources needed for war. Neither has experience nor basing for a blue warpter navy.

  • @WmDuck-gj9mx
    @WmDuck-gj9mx 26 днів тому +21

    I doubt if Shi even cares how many 10’s of thousands of his troops will die for his ambition.

    • @micklaws5520
      @micklaws5520 25 днів тому

      Like a Chinese Police official told a man trying to find food during their main lock down, “There are to many people in China, nobody cares if a couple million of you die, you will not be missed”

    • @Jean-be7uk
      @Jean-be7uk 25 днів тому +5

      I think its the same for our leaders sir.

    • @howardmaryon
      @howardmaryon 25 днів тому +4

      Millions, actually, he has even said that.

    • @tibchy144
      @tibchy144 24 дні тому +1

      propaganda influenced bullshxt comment

    • @YSKWatch
      @YSKWatch 23 дні тому

      ukr already reach more than 100k?

  • @fredc3543
    @fredc3543 26 днів тому +7

    Time to re-think super expensive subs.

    • @superwout
      @superwout 25 днів тому +2

      No not at all they're extremely well developped machines and since they have a crew there's no need for vulnerable communication for remote control. The man-in-the-loop capability means that it can use weapons without the risks of remote operation which can lead to more errors

  • @820hurleyj
    @820hurleyj 18 днів тому

    The volume is too low to hear it.

  • @eug_metta
    @eug_metta 5 днів тому

    So the $300 billion crewed AUKUS is now even more likely to be obsolete?

  • @TwoPercentEMO
    @TwoPercentEMO 25 днів тому +2

    ::why did it sound like the script 4 this video was written by AI bro said the same thing like 4 different ways::

  • @callyman
    @callyman 25 днів тому +1

    Great Post!

  • @gregmorley1997
    @gregmorley1997 25 днів тому

    Dale Brown had the concept in his books years ago, also i wonder where they are sourcing the electronic components from ?

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому

      USA and Europe, Taiwan and Sth Korea. would not trust China and most is Australian technology also.
      Do know Australia has developed technology in Quantum computing areas also lol. Quantum gate is Australian invention..

    • @davidwestwater2219
      @davidwestwater2219 23 дні тому

      Taiwan?

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      It's Australian technology.......hence why the Americans want these (Australia isn't selling our unique products to a country that leaves military equipment behind for the enemy

  • @jamesthornton9399
    @jamesthornton9399 21 день тому

    Short of something that can vacuume away power from ships, and just leave them inert on the surface of the water I do not know what can be done to stop them.

  • @user-en9zo2ol4z
    @user-en9zo2ol4z 25 днів тому +3

    It is interesting that you have begun to involve Australia, of late, in your shows.

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 23 дні тому +3

      Because barely no one else does it, even i was thinking of starting a channel to inform of Australian technology.
      Did you know Australia is a leader in hypersonics also.. but all you hear is USA,China and Russia
      Australia has world fastest scramjet engine of mach 12, Australian Ray Stalker first to get essence of flight from scramjets and he designed world fastest hypersonic wind tunnels to test hypersonics and China world fastest hypersonic tunnel is stolen Ray Stalker designs lol..
      Australia been helping USA in hypersonics for decades..

    • @user-en9zo2ol4z
      @user-en9zo2ol4z 23 дні тому +1

      @@nedkelly9688 Yep, and so much more, our Woomera facilities by were shut down by the yanks for showing them up. The 11 buried computers built for UK telecom were to allow the remaining unit they took back to America to reengineer as ENIAC, etc the all flying tail Miles supersonic aircraft, powered by a new Whittle jet engine, instead of a rocket should have been a world first and not the Bell X-1. Without the all flying tail they had the same problems in the transonic realm as everyone else had. So I understand this as a direct consequence of Lend-Lease debt, which was only paid off by the UK in 2012 I believe? The list is a long one, However ruthlessly obtaining hegemony is a trick the Americans learned only too well from The English Empire.

  • @user-xo7kp6hh2g
    @user-xo7kp6hh2g 9 днів тому

    close but real jack

  • @armstrmb
    @armstrmb 23 дні тому

    What about the Manta?

  • @CCRoselle
    @CCRoselle 25 днів тому +1

    How does the unmanned sub communicate with its base?
    RF and seawater a no-go.
    US ELF was abandoned years back?
    Underwater modems? Follow the trail of dead fish to the sub...

    • @routybouty
      @routybouty 22 дні тому

      Modems don’t have to be that loud.

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому +1

      Australia invented wifi in the 70s mate.....we commercialised it in the 80s.....
      Our ADI and CSIRO wouldn't have a problem making a exceptional CandC system

    • @CCRoselle
      @CCRoselle 19 днів тому

      @@richardcostello360 They why did did US Navy spend $250 MIllion on Clam Lake ELF trans mitter and Republic Mischicgan? Both shut ~2005.
      China is constructing a monster-size ELF...

  • @LoungeSpecialist
    @LoungeSpecialist 22 дні тому

    You ought to raise your volume a bit mr @dark tech

  • @820hurleyj
    @820hurleyj 18 днів тому

    Hey Rocket Man, Elton John is coming back!

  • @MrSpikebender
    @MrSpikebender 25 днів тому +2

    They make it sound like new tech. There is a RC channel I watch that built there own autonomies ecronplane (sorry for the spelling) that I'm sure cost a lot less. With the electronics available to the public. jus sayin

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому +1

      Just saying you have no clue lil kid.
      AI is the key to this and Ghost Bat drones as are the most advanced in any drone in the world..so keep playing with your RC planes as know nothig of high tech stuff.
      America F16 AI jet outperforms humans in dogfighting.. how is your toy RC at that lol.
      Ghost Bat was built to do combat fighting...

  • @adarret
    @adarret 25 днів тому +1

    “Anduril - flame of the west” 🤔

  • @MyKnifeJourney
    @MyKnifeJourney 25 днів тому

    With its multi sea access Australia is perfectly positioned to be a naval powerhouse. Smart, easier to deploy unmanned. Adaptable surveillance

    • @callyman
      @callyman 25 днів тому

      Yep AND Terribly Under Defended since Inception. Traditionally nothing but a breeding factory for The Brits to throw into Battle.
      As an Aussie I sincerely hope my Nation arms itself to it's full potential. They make it about money but money has never been an issue for us, One Very Big reason to arm up!
      We're sitting ducks!

  • @OldGuy70s
    @OldGuy70s 25 днів тому

    BUT u just Told Every1.................

  • @ruffusruffus1
    @ruffusruffus1 8 днів тому

    The only reason they make this public is bc they have something better.

  • @justaguy-69
    @justaguy-69 9 днів тому

    the usa has over 30,000 of these underwater drones that travel at 45 mph and are very hard to track as they turn and spin and dip , they have enough payload to take down an aircraft carrier. they can be launched from aircraft 12 at a time and be pre -programed to seek out their target by signature and gps without any input after launch. 4 at a time can be launched from submarines as far as 500 miles from their target.

  • @callyman
    @callyman 25 днів тому

    Not if their RED!

  • @TheEarl777
    @TheEarl777 25 днів тому

    China is worried by the amazing amount of American military bases in the Pacific.

  • @mughug9616
    @mughug9616 23 дні тому

    The Hidden Clickbait Threat Viewers Never Saw Coming.

  • @lcubed11
    @lcubed11 26 днів тому +2

    looks like an extremely close cousin of the boeing ORCA

    • @mmdirtyworkz
      @mmdirtyworkz 26 днів тому +1

      they literally said that the american vessel is "inspired" by the chinese one

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 26 днів тому +4

      @@mmdirtyworkz Listen again, he said “experts state that it inspired the Chinese design.” Meaning China (as per usual) mimics the design of the Americans.

    • @user-qm8sc1jr9u
      @user-qm8sc1jr9u 26 днів тому +3

      @@mmdirtyworkz wumao

    • @FishandHunt
      @FishandHunt 26 днів тому +1

      @@mmdirtyworkz👈🏻 Spot the Wumao🤖🤣

    • @everypitchcounts4875
      @everypitchcounts4875 25 днів тому +2

      That's because Anduril developed Ghost Shark

  • @paulwilliams9845
    @paulwilliams9845 26 днів тому +2

    What about US sub drone Manta Ray

    • @everypitchcounts4875
      @everypitchcounts4875 25 днів тому +2

      Ghost Shark is made by Anduril an American company. It opened a facility in Australia called Anduril Australia

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому +2

      @@everypitchcounts4875 Anduril Australia is run by Australian's. the AI in Ghost Shark is Australian made and the same as in Ghost Bat and why named Ghost Shark as a tribute to Ghost bat. Stryx a VTOL AI helicopter a loyal wingman to Australia helicopters also use this Aussie AI.
      Yea just because a American company owns something does not mean it is American lol.. some have Australian technology that Australian government owns as was invented in Government agencies like CSIRO and DTSG.. DTSG is like USA DARPA. then they put tender out for their idea to be built.
      JORN radar a Australian marvel of technology and world most advanced radar is all Australian tech but USA and UK defence companies work on it...

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      This isn't an American product........everything in it is Australian designed for our needs.......and we're not selling our products

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 19 днів тому

      @@richardcostello360 Yes we will sell them to any friendly allie who wants them, is a export trade. JORN technology is sold to 5 eyes countries..

  • @tumslucks9781
    @tumslucks9781 24 дні тому

    When I saw the title I assumed it was referring to the Chinese submarine that was sunk in 2023 after colliding with a trapnet.
    The Chinese suffered another disaster 20 years earlier.

  • @goatman3828
    @goatman3828 25 днів тому +3

    How to say nothing while talking for 10 minutes.

  • @user-cd3tq9ye2p
    @user-cd3tq9ye2p 15 днів тому

    if its there, believe me, china saw it coming and they are making some in quantity

  • @YVO007
    @YVO007 24 дні тому

    Pollution ? AI pollution.... We have purchased a thing once again without knowing full well the appropriate way to both respect and limit it.

  • @616CC
    @616CC 25 днів тому +4

    I don’t understand why Australia isn’t a wealthier country they could irrigate their deserts and build more cities they have thousands of miles of unused land. Solar farms with desalination plants would be a good start

    • @stefanblumhoff2744
      @stefanblumhoff2744 25 днів тому +2

      No, hydrologic, mineral, oil, resource deep earth scanning first. Hydrological and topographical survey next. After resource analysis and extraction . Only then do you do irrigation. If truthful Russia, Saudi Arabian, China and many other countries have the same problem.

    • @616CC
      @616CC 25 днів тому +1

      @@stefanblumhoff2744 I would have to agree fantastic, it was just off the top of my head, but it always made me curious why Australia and Canada never expanded and industrialised unused land

    • @616CC
      @616CC 25 днів тому

      @@stefanblumhoff2744 I was starting off with the thought of getting water so I misspoke saying irrigation specifically, I think you may have thought about this a bit more than me which is always surprising to find 😂

    • @ajraussie
      @ajraussie 25 днів тому

      Its simple really. Dumb governments would rather sell at low cost everything we have, instead of production gains through the years

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому

      because of small population, population is why a country is rich usually. most top wealthiest are high populated countries. Even Indonesia now passing Australia economy...

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 25 днів тому

    how many atom bombs does it carry?

  • @usernameinvalidforu
    @usernameinvalidforu 26 днів тому +1

    UA-camrs need to learn to side-chain their vocal tracks with the music.

    • @Hipporider
      @Hipporider 25 днів тому

      At least the irrelevant music isn't too loud, though I prefer none. Damn music makes it so hard to listen to narrators in many youtube clips. I listen to UA-cam clips like this for information, if I wanted music, I dedicate listening to music on its own.

  • @CC-dx6bc
    @CC-dx6bc 24 дні тому

    Red menace 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @petegbailey6231
    @petegbailey6231 26 днів тому +1

    Made in China haa, haa, what joke. Will the Chinese equipment even hold together

  • @Skywatchers
    @Skywatchers 21 день тому

    We know where everything is in the ocean that’s man made!!!

  • @matthewwalker6621
    @matthewwalker6621 25 днів тому

    Why divulge military capability?

    • @davidwestwater2219
      @davidwestwater2219 23 дні тому

      Funding or threat maybe

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 23 дні тому

      They did not and is still top secret on it's capabilities lol.. same with Ghost bat Australian drone. block ii just anounced of it and no one has ever seen it before and go in to service with RAAF next year.
      Australia more top secret then USA in military tech lol...

  • @davemeeks8109
    @davemeeks8109 26 днів тому

    Where's the flying sub humans should have by now. Drone subs were around in the 70s 😮

    • @catbox7958
      @catbox7958 25 днів тому +1

      Subhumans? Woah man. Settle down

    •  22 дні тому +2

      So we're drones. Drones were first introduced by Germany during WW2, but it's taken 70 years to get them operational. Flying wing stealth planes were also prototyped during WW2. Flying submarines will probably never happen because they have the range of a Volkswagen.

  • @onetruekeeper
    @onetruekeeper 23 дні тому

    Anti ship mines that can launch a missile from a submerged launch tube anchored to the sea floor could be simpler than having a undersea drone move around in search of prey.

    • @thomasb5600
      @thomasb5600 20 днів тому

      You need lots of the to mine an area, would require resupply, power and communication issues, fewer drones could do the same and seek resupply when needed.

    • @onetruekeeper
      @onetruekeeper 20 днів тому

      @@thomasb5600 the mines don’t go anywhere so it uses very little energy. They only activate when a signal from a detector is received and it prepares to launch the missile. The battery in the launch tube can last for several years and a solar panel can be deployed to recharge the battery when needed.

    • @onetruekeeper
      @onetruekeeper 20 днів тому

      @@thomasb5600 Only the amount of mines to restrict a certain area is needed and it aint that much. Fewer means less chance of detection.

  • @user-ls9yu9hx8w
    @user-ls9yu9hx8w 23 дні тому

    How is it powered diesel electric? You don’t want a bunch of nuclear reactors floating around at sea unmanned. You start to get into floating nuclear bombs over to your enemies.

    •  22 дні тому +1

      Electric. It's a fraction of the size of a manned submarine because most of the submarine hull is designed to accommodate people. It is a defensive submarine, which means it won't be deployed too far from a base. Australia is building nuclear submarines for further deployment.

  • @kopparsulfat
    @kopparsulfat 26 днів тому +3

    As if china have anything hightech.

    • @MichaelMiller-op8fe
      @MichaelMiller-op8fe 26 днів тому +1

      I don't like what China is doing either but you have to remember they make the machines that make the chips in Taiwan that are too advanced for America to make, yet. We have no idea how advanced they are....

    • @KilianP-my3oe
      @KilianP-my3oe 26 днів тому +2

      probally dont have anything close to high tech some of there naveie ships dont enven have machineguns they take more of the soviet tactics overweal them with cheap equmpinte that may or may not kill its crew

    • @HoboEAT
      @HoboEAT 25 днів тому

      China steals it's tech from careless fools such as the US.

    • @Hipporider
      @Hipporider 25 днів тому +2

      Never underestimate your enemy 🇦🇺

  • @jimhmod
    @jimhmod 11 днів тому

    Small subs have their purpose but they aren't going break through thick ice sheets------just with their bouyancy.

  • @brokens1097
    @brokens1097 25 днів тому +1

    Ooo china

  • @danielnogrady9004
    @danielnogrady9004 23 дні тому +2

    Australia is a great allies to America!

  • @user-xo7kp6hh2g
    @user-xo7kp6hh2g 9 днів тому

    good luck ex pretending to be me hacking my phones

  • @dave5185
    @dave5185 9 днів тому

    love your videos, but this one was full of fluff and repetitive information with relatively little detail.

  • @paulotcj
    @paulotcj 25 днів тому +1

    These AI generated images you used in this video are hard to look at.

  • @watb8689
    @watb8689 24 дні тому

    i laff hard, they already have type 041 mini subs that can detect any incoming vessels around south china sea. they have fleets of them which can even detect US submarines. Going there is signing your own country's death warrant. China already have more ships that the whole US, UK, Australia, Japan and New Zealand combined

    •  22 дні тому +1

      China showed a mock-up of ghost bat after Australia unveiled a working prototype. China is way behind, and that's in the air. They are even further behind in submarines. China might build a mock-up of ghost shark, but it doesn't have the AI technology to power it. Where is the plane that China showed? It's doesn't exist because China doesn't have AI technology.

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      And yet China has no "blue water" navy 🤔
      The Chinese couldn't track this moving at high speed.......meanwhile when it slows to "stealth speed"

  • @andymueller8107
    @andymueller8107 21 день тому

    Your background music is not necessary... please stop it...!!!!

  • @milnez
    @milnez 25 днів тому +2

    Australia is investing in old tech with billions to defend us from our major trading partner 😂😂😂 so dumb

    • @ajraussie
      @ajraussie 25 днів тому

      You would rather stand alone and not together against a threat. But hey you are what you are

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому

      major trading partner that cuts our trade when we do not bend knee and do what they say.. you must be Chinese as no real Aussie trusts China.
      Australia was around and doing well before China, we manufactured good stuff in Australia before we sold out to China. would create more jobs and make us richer. you know nothing or a traitor...

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      It's not "old tech"........we're developing stand alone military capacity and if anything we should be supporting China over the USA 😂

  • @JcoleMc
    @JcoleMc 25 днів тому

    What's with all these gimmick weapons , the military keeps pumping out .

  • @Eduardude
    @Eduardude 12 днів тому

    This video sometimes sounds as if it was written by AI. Needs to be edited down, too many words saying not enough.

  • @quadq6598
    @quadq6598 26 днів тому

    LOL Australian weaponry

    • @FishandHunt
      @FishandHunt 26 днів тому

      lol, Wumao🤖🤣

    • @LeonAust
      @LeonAust 26 днів тому

      I think you should educate yourself and look up the AUKUS signatory in that it's creating the accessibility of Australian companies in conjunction with US and British tech to produce future high tech weapon systems for the western allied effort.
      Australian Universities have always produced high education levels with a high reputation of educating overseas nationalities.
      The Australian Ghost bat drone is on the reduced list that could take out the USAF fighter drone contract.
      I don't think you realise that Australia is a wealthy democratic first world nation, that has one of the highest standards of living in the world! and have always hit hard above their weight in past conflict's, fighting by side with the our Allies US and Great Britain since world war one.
      In WW2 they were the first country to turn back the Germans' in land warfare (Tobruk, North Africa) and the first country to turn back the Japanese on land in the Pacific at (Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea) punching way above their weight of a WW2 population of just 8 million.
      Then one can add Korea, Vietnam, Gulf wars 1 & 2, and support of many united nations efforts ........and yes Australia is a country that does not sit on the fence.
      In you saying "lol Australian weaponry" well not only we are capable of design and manufacture, but we also know how to use it!

    • @Moodymongul
      @Moodymongul 25 днів тому

      i iked their Metal Storm series :)

    • @LeonAust
      @LeonAust 25 днів тому +2

      Why bother I'm as getting my responses removed with no feedback!!.......why bother responding to comments, yet this guy can insult my country!

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому +1

      Yea Australia has invented a lot actually. more important tech then a lot of countries. lot of Australian technology in USA weapons lol. why Boeing Australia, Lockheed Martin Raytheon all have big R&D facilities in Australia employing Australian's to develop them technology...

  • @billkiesewetter1271
    @billkiesewetter1271 24 дні тому

    Who is this guy? Speaking fast, using deceptive implications and having no real information is a total waste of time.

  • @keything8487
    @keything8487 26 днів тому

    an obligatory comment ...... here

  • @AAAXXX-ch3oh
    @AAAXXX-ch3oh 12 днів тому

    This is so funny. China launched a similar product in 2016, but the US is only developing it now???

  • @murphychris9811
    @murphychris9811 26 днів тому +4

    why is china being such bellends all the time them and russia always being bellends

    • @Ubique2927
      @Ubique2927 26 днів тому +6

      They are paranoid to such an extent that they are paranoid about being paranoid.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 26 днів тому

      @@Ubique2927 A byproduct of communism.

    • @mred8002
      @mred8002 26 днів тому

      Their naked goal is subjugation of the entire planet under their rule. And space, too, for that matter. The will do anything and everything to accomplish that. Morals and ethics are alien concepts.

    • @dtddtd1
      @dtddtd1 25 днів тому

      Thanks to paranoia of the west and from the endless lies of western mass media.

  • @miller2675
    @miller2675 25 днів тому

    You just repeated yourself over and over talking about how it will change everything. Great.
    How is it powered? Any information on its range at all? Speculation in that? Materials? Any interesting details?!

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 25 днів тому +1

      Lol Australia is dead secret in it's technologies and capabilities and does not brag like the powerhouses need to.
      Ghost Bat no one still know what it is capable of while USA brags to heaven about it's AI F16 being as good as humans.
      Barely no one know MQ28A Ghost Bat drone we been seeing was just a test bed for it's AI capability and if it's airframe could hold up to real world conditions.
      Released few weeks ago was Australian Defence minister saying Block ii of Ghost Bat is being released and in service with RAAF 2025 and is a bigger version to carry more weapons.
      Australia also has world fastest scramjet engine at mach 12 and in 300 days test fly a hypersonic drone and these guys all helped USA in hypersonics in HIFIRE and SCIFIRE joint USA, Australia hypersonic tests...

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      Australia doesn't talk about national security issues with the world😂
      We keep our capabilities protected........but we lead in AI and "battle swarm" techniques

  • @ericyeo805
    @ericyeo805 13 днів тому

    Talk big as if all others are inferior. The proof is in the puddings.

  • @stuartcleary71
    @stuartcleary71 24 дні тому

    Only ten years behind Russia's Posiedon similar time frame as US Manta. Except Russia's Posiedon is nuclear powered and if required Nuclear weapons capable, with unlimited range, 100kph for 2500 Km's loitering and evasion capable, able to take out aircraft carriers or coastal cities.

    • @keithdrower9120
      @keithdrower9120 24 дні тому +1

      Stay in Ruzzia....!

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 23 дні тому

      Russia does not even have AI drone airplanes and prove are way behind,, needed Iran drones and Russia equipment performance in Ukraine or lack of performance prove Russia way behind in all technologies lol.. can noit believe comunist authoritorian countries in telling the truth..
      Russia invents Turtle tanks to defeat drones while West use anti drone systems on theirs lol....

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      Except this has been in development since the 90s......utilising the latest technology in AI control and "battle swarm" coordination 😂
      These aren't offensive weapons, they have a high cruising speed and they are very hard to detect on current sonar systems
      They don't need nukes......because they chase loud Chinese diesels

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 19 днів тому

      @@richardcostello360 This drone has not been in development since 90's lol...

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 7 днів тому

      @nedkelly9688 yeah they have been......Thales and BaE systems were playing around with testbeds/prototypes at Cockburn Sound and Williamstown Vic since then.....

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 26 днів тому +1

    3 cheers for Australia for development as I am fully engaged in Democratic Politics although not so in unfettered Capitalism

  • @MiroRusev.000.
    @MiroRusev.000. 21 день тому

    Another example of AI uselessness!

  • @tonbopro
    @tonbopro 25 днів тому

    great,now Naval History only goes back as the naming of Formosa and ignores older Chinese claims

  • @KentHaughton
    @KentHaughton 26 днів тому

    We are all dead

  • @Martingray7875
    @Martingray7875 24 дні тому

    Be a lot smarter if they created one that acted like a sub until it's told to shoot itself out of the water and turn into a fast low flying nuke

    • @richardcostello360
      @richardcostello360 19 днів тому

      We don't do nukes in Australia mate

    • @Martingray7875
      @Martingray7875 19 днів тому

      @@richardcostello360 I'm sorry your government isn't smart enough to have them made

  • @truthhunter1177
    @truthhunter1177 7 днів тому

    What USA needs a submarine killer drone unmanned that can stay underwater for years or sleeper drones technology