The Netherlands: Compact But Capable Defense

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 589

  • @DeKempster
    @DeKempster Місяць тому +482

    Russia sure has accomplished much. They made the Dutch spend money.

    • @Ikbeneengeit
      @Ikbeneengeit Місяць тому +58

      Spot on. As a Dutch, I'm not even offended.

    • @boerde6202
      @boerde6202 Місяць тому +5

      @@Ikbeneengeit Eh..

    • @user-uk9sd2ln7f
      @user-uk9sd2ln7f Місяць тому +1

      We were ruled by a Russophobe imbecile for more than a decade. That's probably the reason why he's the NAVO top guy at the moment.

    • @TheSuperappelflap
      @TheSuperappelflap Місяць тому +29

      We never had a problem with spending money on good investments. We give the most money per capita to the EU by far, and that is also a great investment. Spending more on our own military industry is not a bad deal at all. Creates high level engineering jobs and knowledge transfer, expanding industrial base, all the money comes back anyway.

    • @boerde6202
      @boerde6202 Місяць тому +9

      @@TheSuperappelflap Eh.. 1. Trump zei als eerst dat Europese landen zich aan de NATO norm moeten houden(of anders) . 2. De EEG was zo'n slecht idee nog niet? Maar het gedrocht wat de EU heet heeft geen mandaat. Wat mij betreft mogen ze de Benelux wel weer wat belangrijker maken? Daar delen wij veel meer waarden mee.

  • @SIG442
    @SIG442 Місяць тому +137

    Should have added that the Dutch Marines are the first marines (in a modern sense) in the world. Not the US Marines as many wish to believe. Established on 10 December 1665 and based on the classical era of Trireme ships (Mediterranean from the 7th to the 4th centuries BC) where after ramming the soldiers boarding the enemy ships. Yet the Dutch were the first to change the concept into what we are more known with today and calling it "Mariniers" (which in English changed to Marines). The first ideas came as early as 1627 on the initiative of Lieutenant Admiral Philips van Dorp, 1000 soldiers were distributed over ships to enter enemy ships. However after the Peace of Münster treaty in 1648 the troops disappeared again from the fleet.
    In 1663 there was a request to add them again, but this was declined. In 1665 these were added after all on initiative from Grand Pensionary Johan de Witt and Lieutenant Admiral Michiel de Ruyter. The first commander was Willem Joseph van Ghent after whom the Van Ghentkazerne in Rotterdam is named. December 10, 1665 is considered the founding date of the Corps. The corps was put into action during the Raid on Medway (in Dutch "Toch naar Chatham") as one of their first major incidents (and a huge blow to the English crown).
    Now unlike the US counter parts, the Dutch Marines train globally and do a even tougher training then the US Marines. You could there for easily say the Dutch Marines are the US marines but on steriods. KCT is however taking that even to a much higher level and MARSOF being a Dutch SEAL team which roughly could do the same as the American teams, yet have the luxury of being more hidden as even the regular Dutch civilian hardly knows about their existence. They are however much broader trained and can be put into various situations and there for are far more capable in a broad sense of the word. This due to the team being rather small in numbers and having to make up for that. Which doesn't make them a easy target at all.
    Regarding the Fennek vehicles, these are so cramped that tall people can't enter. You need to be rather short to even get inside them. While being a well capable vehicle, they make you remind of a typical clown car if it comes to the soldiers that need to get in this cramped vehicle.
    There are 4 Walrus Class submarines, not 3. 2 are indeed going to be upgraded, but the rumors are that all 4 will get the same upgrades instead being replaced completely. Giving a total of 8 submarines including the new 4 that will be added soon. These old Diesel subs might look dated, but even the US Navy couldn't find a single Walrus class submarine during a Navy war game operation. Even with the Americans cheating in getting a additional fleet in without telling the Dutch Navy. The Dutch Walrus class managed to sneak in, kill the primary target and take out the secondaries, then sneak out without being spotted once. If that isn't a middle finger to the mighty US Navy...
    For the Rotterdam-class ships, 1 is to be replaced and the crew is actually temporarily placed on a Karel Doorman-class frigate (which is now pretty much laying in port without a task). Once the replacement ship is ready, the crew will be placed on that new ship. This new ship will be more similar to a helicopter carrier mixed with the original task of the Rotterdam-class and being much bigger. For some additional info: ua-cam.com/video/CjX5_KprcEM/v-deo.html&ab_channel=NavalNews
    (0:54 Look at the bottom listing on this chart, LPD & Patrol Vessel replacement. Patrol vessel being the Holland-class and LPD being the Rotterdam-class)
    (Yes, they did claim the ships would be smaller. But the image shown there shows a ship that's much bigger)
    All 4 Alkmaar class ships have their destinations already, 2 of which going to Ukraine after being refitted with more modern equipment.
    Ukraine info: www.naval-technology.com/projects/alkmaar-class-mine-countermeasures-vessels-netherlands/
    De Zeven Provincien -class has 4 currently, with the 2 new ones that will be 6. I have however some intel that suggests it will be 4-6 new ships instead of 2 new ones. Which would bring the hypothetical total to 10. With the current Russia-Ukraine war situation it seems the Dutch Navy is waking up and trying to rebuild their navy from the ground up. However also this much older ship class seems to be included as it stands now. The 4 existing ships would get a upgrade to modern standards while the new ships are planned to have them build in from the start.
    The Netherlands punches well above their weight class for centuries. The current problem is that the numbers are so low thanks to the government being delusional and dumb. I seriously do hope in coming years it's back to where it should be if not better. There is talk of conscription, although these voices are not spoken out loud as it might panic the people. The main goal first is to get enough material, uniforms, vehicles, etc. before adding new personnel. This would however mean that both men as women are conscripted. Technically speaking conscription is still by law mandatory although the military is rather avoiding the issue and not sending out those letters of conscription (which I think is a dumb idea, it would be very good to see this fully return. Regardless if you are part of the blue haired freakshow or not. Some discipline can do wonders)

    • @JW-1980
      @JW-1980 Місяць тому +13

      I've also read on several occasions that a company in the Netherlands (Thales?) has developed the most accurate radar?

    • @SIG442
      @SIG442 Місяць тому +14

      @@JW-1980 Yup, just as the GOALKEEPER system that the US would love to get their hands on, but were refused. This leading to the US making their own variant.

    • @TheSuperappelflap
      @TheSuperappelflap Місяць тому +7

      ​@@JW-1980 Thats not the only thing Thales makes that is world class, they produce a lot of different specialized equipment for other NATO countries.
      Because of the smaller size of European countries and limited budgets compared to the US military, every country specializes in some areas and then we put all those components together to make very high quality military equipment together. For example Sweden which recently joined NATO, has been cooperating with NATO countries for joint development for a long time and they have their own very high quality aircraft and naval fleet.
      These are very complex international supply chains so its also a vulnerability, if one of those components cannot be manufactured or delivered it will be difficult to manage that situation, but its also a strength because of the specialization it allows where a big country like the USA has to invest in matching that quality on all fronts by themselves. Of course we also have joint projects with the US like the JSF.
      The performance of these European systems in Ukraine clearly shows that this system is effective at countering a much larger military force with sheer quality and efficiency.
      With military budgets now expanded due to the security concers, i think you will se a lot more examples of world class Dutch, German, Swedish, French, etc, military engineering in the future. The import tariffs Trump tried during his first term already showed that even the US is heavily reliant on things like Dutch and German steel for civilian industry. And of course the lithography machines from ASML are one of the hottest commodities on the planet that wars may be started over. We have a long and proud tradition of engineering here on the mainland of Europe just like the UK and US and Japan do.

    • @roykliffen9674
      @roykliffen9674 Місяць тому

      TBF the British also have a good claim of having the first marines. It's a question of months and depends on what can be considered the First "official" indicator of having a formal marine corps.

    • @SIG442
      @SIG442 Місяць тому +1

      @@roykliffen9674 While the British Marines are dated to 1664, they can not back it up by more then that date. While as you might have noticed, the Dutch marines are present quite a bit longer then that. So, sorry to tell you this. But that claim wouldn't be true :)

  • @Drrolfski
    @Drrolfski Місяць тому +70

    Like all Western militaries, the Netherlands is still hopelessly underequipped for massive drone and anti-drone warfare, especially when it comes to personnel. But Ukraine was a wake-up call, and they are scaling up. Whether it will be sufficient remains to be seen.

    • @whoknows8225
      @whoknows8225 Місяць тому

      yeah... how will you launch drones tho? from where? did you look at the geographics of the Netherlands?

    • @Drrolfski
      @Drrolfski Місяць тому +2

      @@whoknows8225 From everywhere of course, short range and long range.There are hardly limitations. What geographics problem prevents the Netherlands from using them, during wartime and on missions?

    • @whoknows8225
      @whoknows8225 Місяць тому

      @@Drrolfski thought you meant against... will be hard to launch them from the sea without being noticed

    • @dodo299
      @dodo299 Місяць тому +1

      @@whoknows8225 The Dutch are in control of the most accurate radars and also have the Caribbean islands.

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver Місяць тому

      Yea, thats not going to happen.
      Even the US cant fill their quota.

  • @_PJW_
    @_PJW_ Місяць тому +95

    Very nice. A lot of things I didn't know.
    Minor detail : 1:30 : "The Netherlands is one [-] of the 27 member states of the European Union or the EU."
    Together with Belgium and Luxembourg The Netherlands in 1944 formed the Benelux. Which laid the foundation for the later European Union.

    • @apveening
      @apveening Місяць тому +4

      The Benelux admiralty was mentioned.

    • @daanstrik4293
      @daanstrik4293 Місяць тому +15

      Always funny to remember that the EU is basically a massively bloated trade agreement for coal & steel in the benelux.

    • @horowitz8680
      @horowitz8680 Місяць тому +3

      @@daanstrik4293 No lol. It used to be, that was called the EEG. But now, it's a much bigger, more fleshed out political ideology of unification. It's to avoid bloodshed, on the continent that saw the most wars throughout history, from ever happening again. That's why the EU exists.
      ...And the economical benefits sweeten the deal aswell.

    • @SkinPeeleR
      @SkinPeeleR Місяць тому +2

      ​@@horowitz8680it's a magnet for freeloaders and leeches.

    • @TheSuperappelflap
      @TheSuperappelflap Місяць тому +1

      The Benelux countries were also 3 of the 6 founding members of the precursor to the EU, the other 3 being France, West Germany and Italy. Which is historically very interesting if you draw parallells between the borders of those countries and then the HRE or the Carolingian empire. You might say its a project that has been thousands of years in the making.

  • @remcoasselbergs3298
    @remcoasselbergs3298 Місяць тому +171

    Dutch marine korps (late 1700s) is the oldest organized in modern way and 3rd or 4th marine corps ever.

    • @Rasaevire
      @Rasaevire Місяць тому +60

      dude its the first marine corpse ever.(1665) when America wasn't even an idea.

    • @Alduin101
      @Alduin101 Місяць тому +29

      @@Rasaevire The Spanish, Portuguese and British are all technically older, but they did not yet operate in the way modern Marine Corps do. Which is why what he said was correct, the Dutch was the first Modern Marine Corp, but not the first in general.
      That said, I do also consider the Dutch one the oldest, and the others as technicalities.

    • @kaasmeester5903
      @kaasmeester5903 Місяць тому +4

      @@Rasaevire It depends a little on how you define "marine corps". The Spanish and Italians were the first to use specially trained sailors as infantry, with the Spanish Marine Corps being the oldest such corps still in active service. The Netherlands and the British came after that, but I'm not sure which of them created the first "true marine corps", i.e. a dedicated corps of specially trained infantry who aren't also sailors. But since they are working closely together I suppose they can share that distinction :)

    • @Rasaevire
      @Rasaevire Місяць тому +2

      @kaasmeester5903 winnaars schrijven geschiedenis dus die chorizomeesters kunnen kaas eten

    • @MauriceEscargot
      @MauriceEscargot Місяць тому +4

      I love seeing the conception of the Korps Mariniers in the movie "Michiel De Ruyter", however I do think it's a bit of a matter of semantics on what the first marine corps actually was. Do hoplites on board ships of ancient Greece not count?

  • @parmentier7457
    @parmentier7457 Місяць тому +50

    The Dutch army also has a strong presence in the Dutch Caribbean, to patrol the drug routes between South America and the US, but also because it borders Venezuela. According to Venezuela, the Dutch Caribbean islands are part of their territory.
    In 2010, there was almost a conflict between the Netherlands and Venezuela, because the American DEA arrested a Venezuelan consul in Aruba. President Hugo Chavez then sent his naval fleet to the Dutch Caribbean. Eventually, The Hague released the consul because he has immunity. Washington was furious with the Netherlands.
    In addition, there is compulsory military service on the Dutch Caribbean islands. That is why there are militia units on Aruba and Curaçao.
    The Dutch navy has two naval bases here and there are two marines, a commando corps stationed. In addition, there is a rotating army company. On all six Caribbean islands there is also a Royal Netherlands Coast Guard and Royal Marechaussee (Gendarme). The Dutch Customs is present on three islands.

    • @DongWoo-m5x
      @DongWoo-m5x Місяць тому +1

      Was het niet zo tijdens de MH17 gebeuren dat er een bepaald zuid amerikaans land 1 van onze bewindseiland bedreigde met een aantal mariene bootjes. En wie moesten we ookal om hulp vragen, omdat we niks daar in de buurt hadden of uberhaupt iets konden sturen

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      Good points. Sounds like a good topic.

    • @AudieHolland
      @AudieHolland 28 днів тому +3

      Unfortunately, a few Dutch Marines were arrested for attempting to smuggle drugs themselves when the reason for their deployment in the Caribbean was to *fight* the cocaine trade.

    • @jorickjoetoep
      @jorickjoetoep 26 днів тому

      ​@@AudieHolland all marines smuggle some illegal stuff.

    • @UPPERKEES
      @UPPERKEES 5 днів тому

      NL would lose those islands in a heartbeat when Venezuela attacks. Logistics is mainly the issue. And I think NATO doesn't apply to those islands.

  • @dpswets
    @dpswets Місяць тому +26

    Never seen a video that describes the modern Dutch armed forces in such a detailed and correct way. I went into the video wondering how much would be correct and how deep the info would be, but I'm positively surprised by everything! There probably are some minor stuff that's missing but well, that's minor. Are you from the Netherlands yourself?

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +2

      Thank you! I really appreciate that.

  • @UndercoverPirate69
    @UndercoverPirate69 Місяць тому +50

    The Dutch actually owns an F16 patent and built them at the Fokker factory for other European countries which is the reason why there are version differences compared to the United States models. Also HIMARS installations and more Patriot systems. Next to this there are also a bunch of private defense contractors developing new unmanned systems and thinking about NGAD unmanned drone fighter jets for the F35 networked platform

    • @Tensei_TV
      @Tensei_TV Місяць тому +1

      I've also heard that there are some incentives to re-establish small arms production in NL but idk how they are doing now

    • @dpswets
      @dpswets Місяць тому +1

      Small correction; we do not have himars systems but bought PULS instead. First systems were delivered earlier this year.

    • @user-uk9sd2ln7f
      @user-uk9sd2ln7f Місяць тому +1

      Oekraïneleeghoofd gespot

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver Місяць тому

      Yea pity the F16 is not suited for prolonged combat.
      F35 is even worse, with 70% non mission capable status.

    • @5674657
      @5674657 27 днів тому +1

      @@user-uk9sd2ln7f Russische bot?

  • @dirk307
    @dirk307 Місяць тому +37

    Dutch marines are good at specialized tasks, we don't have large numbers, that's why we are specialists. specialized in humanitarian rescue missions, such as UN tasks, security, arctic training, anti-terrorism and hijackings. Furthermore, We have some of the best frogmen and mountain leaders in the world, they have high-quality equipment and combat knowledge and a mentality that is equal to the toughest army's in the world. We never give up!!

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver Місяць тому +2

      Thats nonsense.
      You base it on what the mariniers once were.
      Fact of the matter is that every country has specialized troops. And a number of those now have combat experience, which is very important.
      Furthermore, we only have a couple of 1000. Thats what Ukrain loses in a day.

    • @sahin569
      @sahin569 24 дні тому

      yea we saw in bbosnia how your specialists soldiers ran away allowing a massacre, knowingly! many of them returned with a lot of guilt and no balls

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver 22 дні тому +2

      @@sahin569 Thats not true.
      Im not allowed to say much on that, but the dutch troops were not marines, lightly equipped and were facing tanks and all the rest. They asked air support 3 times and were told to put that in writing.
      What happened there was a setup. Those people were betrayed by their own leaders, just as the dutch soldiers were by theirs.
      A day later the siege of Sarajevo ended.
      It was a deal.
      And what happened to those people, although of course the actual culprits are unnamed, was revenge for what they did to the opposite side there in that region.
      Apart from all the victims, the dutch soldiers were also victimized. And the dutch people as a whole.

    • @sahin569
      @sahin569 21 день тому

      @@StofStuiver shameful you cant even admit it

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver 21 день тому +1

      @@sahin569 Already explained that its not true.

  • @hansvandijk1487
    @hansvandijk1487 25 днів тому +6

    Very well edited. Great video!
    Greetings from the Netherlands 🇳🇱.

  • @Frazec_Atsjenkov
    @Frazec_Atsjenkov Місяць тому +26

    As far as I'm aware, the French built replacement submarines for the Walrus class are not slatted to carry tomahawks because the French builder does not have the security clearance to install them. Perhaps they will be added later by a different company. But as I heard, it will be tricky.

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому +3

      The French aren't building them alone. It was a bid by the NAVAL group and a network of Dutch companies that help installing and developing the systems.

    • @Frazec_Atsjenkov
      @Frazec_Atsjenkov Місяць тому +3

      @donenzonen I'm my opinion the national builder is often added because it makes the bid easier to sell politically.

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +2

      Right now, they're saying Tomahawks for the subs. But we'll see, what the Dutch government said is any of the competitors (from France/Sweden/Germany) would've faced the same missile integration issue. France, though, has the Tomahawk-equivalent MdCN as a possible alternative.

    • @jl-rq7ux
      @jl-rq7ux 27 днів тому +2

      ​@@DefenseIndexThe navi then has to buy and maintain two different weaponsystems where one was planned.
      The US must stop and threat allies as enemies. The EU must create a unified weapons market. Bring together the best in the market to create one very very good system of a kind, instead of making moderate systems that cannot integrate or are not allowed on other countries platforms.
      The EU stands for Union, but under the hood there is a lot of friction and self preservation between the "united" nations.

    • @stefanmplayer
      @stefanmplayer 27 днів тому +1

      @@jl-rq7uxonly union that exists in the EU is between the hang arounds in Brussels and Strasbourg making sure everyone’s money flows into their private pockets😂

  • @mikevanmilligen9370
    @mikevanmilligen9370 Місяць тому +37

    My compliments! The video is very accurate and up to date. Very well edited too.

  • @cyraxisme9998
    @cyraxisme9998 Місяць тому +18

    I thought this was a 200K plus channel. Apparently it is not, though the content definitely is at that level. You gained yourself another sub, keep making videos

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +2

      I appreciate that and reading it is really encouraging. Thanks for subscribing!

  • @8020erwin
    @8020erwin Місяць тому +48

    good and clear video, thanks. Strange it has not more views

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +14

      Thank you and do appreciate your encouraging comment. This channel is just getting started and there's more to come.

    • @Hellboy_2109
      @Hellboy_2109 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@DefenseIndex ai voice

    • @jesser1103
      @jesser1103 Місяць тому +8

      I feel like this is just a chat gpt output thrown into a ai voiceover with stock footage :/

    • @IlINeptuneIlI
      @IlINeptuneIlI Місяць тому +1

      ​@@jesser1103 agreed, moving on to the next channel

    • @centje6750
      @centje6750 Місяць тому

      Yeah its just getting sad now all effort thrown out of the window ​@jesser1103

  • @OfficialNymos
    @OfficialNymos Місяць тому +21

    Excellent video. I had to do a double take when looking at your subscriber count, expecting "207K", rather than "207" subscribers. The amount of research, clarity of presentation and overall production are of a standard that far exceeds this number. I have obviously liked and subscribed, and hopefully many more will do the same in the future. Keep up the good work!

    • @70Theprince
      @70Theprince Місяць тому

      Lets fix the subscriber amount

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      I really appreciate your kind words. Thanks for subscribing. Cheers!

  • @tjerkbuma5907
    @tjerkbuma5907 Місяць тому +28

    Very well researched video. My compliments.

    • @timpyrules
      @timpyrules Місяць тому

      Tbf this is the video equivalent of reading out a wikipedia page

    • @StofStuiver
      @StofStuiver Місяць тому

      How can you judge that, if you dont know FACTS?
      What is said on military is BS, but you or the people that voted you up, have no idea of that, so you think whatever is said and sounds good, is true.

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Thank you! I appreciate that.

  • @tarickw
    @tarickw Місяць тому +13

    at 6:21 you could've probably mentioned that rotterdam is the largest port in europe and therefore we are probably going to be an important transit hub in such a scenario

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      That's right.

    • @oddballsok
      @oddballsok 27 днів тому

      ..except..the tNato transit harbour is Flushing...AWAY from the main PEACE trade port Rotterdam..

  • @thombrick
    @thombrick Місяць тому +25

    Please do the Belgian armed forces next, it would be a nice follow-up on this one!

    • @JamesRadnus
      @JamesRadnus 23 дні тому +2

      That video would be too short

    • @julesdebeckker627
      @julesdebeckker627 9 днів тому +1

      @@JamesRadnus Joke's on you fella

    • @Thule-gesellschaft
      @Thule-gesellschaft 3 дні тому

      Im from Belgium. Atleast the Dutch spend money on defence Belgium is just a shitshow

    • @julesdebeckker627
      @julesdebeckker627 3 дні тому

      @@Thule-gesellschaft I'm also from Belgium and am not happy with the state of the armed forces, hence why I'm joining, can't complain about something and not try to help to fix it :)

  • @OhhDaarBenJePerry
    @OhhDaarBenJePerry Місяць тому +5

    A little mistake in the video at 20:00, all of the Dutch CH47 it currently has started life as the F model. The first 6 F models were delivered in the early 2010’s to replace 2 lost D models and grow the fleet to a total of 17 chinooks. (11x D, 6x F). These original F models did have special adaptations for the RNLAF, and were different compared to the standard US version. After the introduction of the F model, plans were made to upgrade the existing D models to F models, but after research the NL MOD found out it was actually better to replace the existing D, as of the original order of 13 units in 1993, only 6 were brand new, the other 7 are CH47C bought from Canada and upgraded to the D model. In 2015 the RNLAF ordered 14 new CH47F, to raplace the D models and grow the fleet to 20 units. To save some costs, the RNLAF bought the same versions as the US army, specifically the CH-47F MYII CAAS, as this was cheaper compared to more custimized versions like the original order of 6 F models, though the 14 newly ordered did have some slight upgrades compared to the US version, but nothing major. In order to get full fleet commonality, the RNLAF decided to upgrade the “old” F models tot the same standard as the “new” F models. Not a single Dutch CH-47D has been upgraded to ghe CH-47F model!

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      Right, thanks for the clarification.

    • @OhhDaarBenJePerry
      @OhhDaarBenJePerry Місяць тому +1

      @ i forgot to add, but for the rest the video was really interesting and nice to watch!

  • @SuperYv9
    @SuperYv9 Місяць тому +7

    I have been at Thales, a very big dutch company for a school project. They produce all sorts of radar systems for a bunch of countries. Almost all of the radar systems on dutch navy ships are from thales. 22:36 I have seen this radar system and it is really large, you can walk through it! And it has a range of over 2000 km! 37:16 This is a test room in thales I have been here.
    Very cool video, I really liked it!

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      Glad you liked it. That's a great experience you had visiting Thales, one of the world's leading radar companies.

  • @Douwe02
    @Douwe02 Місяць тому +6

    High quality video, keep this up and you'll make it.

  • @julian-Boes
    @julian-Boes Місяць тому +4

    Well put together video man, really love the background shots

  • @Hiwired96
    @Hiwired96 Місяць тому +1

    I learned a lot from this video, thanks!

  • @Its_Me_Romano
    @Its_Me_Romano 29 днів тому +8

    kinda upset you didn't mention the OOCL (Operationeel Ondersteunigs Commando Landstrijdkrachten) which is the biggest branch in the Dutch army and supports the fighting troops I myself serve in this branch!

    • @AudieHolland
      @AudieHolland 28 днів тому +2

      Veels te lange naam om te onthouden, zelfs in het Nederlands.
      Waarom niet gewoon OCL (Ondersteunings Commando Landstrijdaargh)?

    • @mikewiersma5160
      @mikewiersma5160 26 днів тому

      Wat doen jullie? Mankracht of zijn jullie de oren en ogen van?

    • @Its_Me_Romano
      @Its_Me_Romano 25 днів тому

      @@mikewiersma5160 ik zit persoonlijk in de bevoorrading. Maar de genie, verbindingsdienst en luchtverdediging vallen hier allen ook onder :)

  • @heinhermans4532
    @heinhermans4532 Місяць тому +3

    Up to date en wel done.thx

  • @PLA022
    @PLA022 Місяць тому +3

    Excellent video! Nevertheless I have a couple remarks. The Dutch armed forces will acquire some 500 Caracal vehicles and Germany approx. 1,000. I miss the Vector ATV used by KCT, MARSOF and the Ranger Battalion (part of 11 Air Assault Brigade). Other than that, again, excellent video. Keep up the good work!

  • @apertamono
    @apertamono 28 днів тому +2

    This is a good overview which I haven't seen in the Dutch media. Question for defence experts, given the experience of the war in Ukraine: do you also get the impression that we have a relatively low number of artillery systems?

    • @edjepe5556
      @edjepe5556 26 днів тому +1

      Netherlands wil never go at it alone, so we will always be integrated with other NATO force and systems...
      NATO, in 2024 has around 15.000 artillerty pieces, this includes towed, self-propeled and MLRSystems...

  • @psyopsism
    @psyopsism 10 днів тому

    Thank you for excellent content!

  • @joostprins3381
    @joostprins3381 Місяць тому +3

    The organization for the logistics is called NDTA, it’s a combination of Belgium, Dutch and US army and Dutch and Belgian civilians who are specialized in logistics.
    The reason is that Antwerp and Rotterdam are the two biggest harbors in Europe and consist of the best logistics due to their infrastructure is very complicated but super efficient. We are the gate to Germany and Europe!

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Right, good point about logistics.

    • @joostprins3381
      @joostprins3381 Місяць тому

      @ without logistics wars are lost, Napoleon, Hitler are the prime examples.

  • @InfantTree
    @InfantTree 22 дні тому +3

    15:52 thats not true, NATRES has been deployed abroad in the past

  • @danielkesseler6106
    @danielkesseler6106 Місяць тому +5

    Ukraine and the Netherlands now have created atleast 1 factory for drones in the Netherlands.

  • @jeroenvangastel9079
    @jeroenvangastel9079 Місяць тому

    Very solid post 👍🏼, as a Dutchie there were lots of things I did not know about. Especially the enormous amount of changes to the navy. Thanks again !

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you! I knew they had some naval projects going on but yes, I was also surprised how comprehensive they were.

  • @Floris_VI
    @Floris_VI Місяць тому +2

    honestly pretty good for an ai voiced video, usually they are complete slop but this is well researched

  • @Whoosh0001
    @Whoosh0001 Місяць тому +1

    Excellent video. I've joined and will follow your channel!

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Thank you for your kind words and for subscribing. Cheers!

  • @joopschaeffer6826
    @joopschaeffer6826 Місяць тому +2

    The new airdefence systems are 21 Nasams and 18 Nomads

  • @Juzemeen
    @Juzemeen Місяць тому +4

    up that CV90 number to 300 and you have a scary force.

    • @feddek9325
      @feddek9325 8 днів тому +1

      They operated 196 CV90s and 100 Leopard 2A6 in 2010. The Ministry of Defence thought the CV-90 could take on all the roles of the Leopard plus more and sold them with the 50 PRTL's and 24 m270's

  • @tonnywildweasel8138
    @tonnywildweasel8138 Місяць тому +2

    Very good 👍 Thanks.
    Greets from Grun' 🇳🇱, TW.

  • @lukegaming6640
    @lukegaming6640 25 днів тому +1

    Minor detail on 7:19, one of these battalions is a ranger battalion.

  • @richardvand.3925
    @richardvand.3925 Місяць тому +1

    Great video, pretty accurate and complete except that you didn’t mention the establisment of the 12th Ranger Batallion as part of the 11th Air Mobile Brigade.

  • @remcoasselbergs3298
    @remcoasselbergs3298 Місяць тому +7

    Do not forget ABC caraibian countries and municipalities like aruba, curaçao, st martin, saba, bonaire and st eustatius its a bit bigger and strategic interesting country...

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Yes, I could only mention them briefly but the Dutch Caribbean is interesting too.

  • @jarodiking2559
    @jarodiking2559 Місяць тому +8

    i wish we also built scale-able ammo muntions factories

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому +2

      something tells me that will happen soon enough. with america going crazy, we cannot depend on them. particularly perhaps a good thing....

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому

      It is already being done on European scale. French and German companies already received support to scale up production

    • @walvis1967up
      @walvis1967up 24 дні тому

      Rheinmetall will make this year already 700.000 155 mm ammo. Next year they hope it wil be 1 million and they are building three new factories. America is way behind 155 mm munations.

  • @merijnfluitman5761
    @merijnfluitman5761 27 днів тому +5

    At one point, recently, the Dutch military was so underfunded that during exercises they had to yell "Pew pew pew" because bullets were just too expensive

    • @kknub4766
      @kknub4766 26 днів тому

      that's been the case since all the way back in the late 90s, my dad was a volunteer in the royal netherlands army as a paratrooper and later became a commando, during basic training they occasionally had to yell "peng peng peng!" which is, well a bit odd but i suppose it works?

    • @bartdongen3884
      @bartdongen3884 25 днів тому

      Thank God that we finally wil spend more money on defence.

  • @TheKnaeckebrot
    @TheKnaeckebrot Місяць тому

    Really great Video! I did not know your channel before, but youve got a new subscriber :)
    p.s.: I found your rate of speaking a bit slow, but no problem with youtube (x1,15 Speed fits best for me)

  • @bartdongen3884
    @bartdongen3884 25 днів тому

    Greatings from the Netherlands

  • @CyberBeep_kenshi
    @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому +2

    we also got the DSI, a combination of army and police, used in all sorts of issues, from disturbed people to terrorism. Very unique

    • @T40Xdav
      @T40Xdav Місяць тому +1

      There are more Marines in DSI then Amy

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому

      @T40Xdav could be, i should say military instead of army i realise.

    • @T40Xdav
      @T40Xdav Місяць тому

      @ yes. ‘Army’ is only the land force (Koninklijke Landmacht). DSI is made up of Police and military members (Marines, Army and Marechaussee - don’t think that have Navy (fleet) and Air Force)

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому

      @T40Xdav i got lost in translation lol

  • @mozzarella2261
    @mozzarella2261 26 днів тому

    Fantastic video

  • @lexvangelder2525
    @lexvangelder2525 29 днів тому

    Probably the most important role of the Netherlands during the Cold War and again in the current era of escalating tension is that of pre-eminent logistic and transportation hub for NATO on mainland Europe. Large harbour for equipment disembarcation coupled with strong West to East transportation infrastructure such as railway, highway, and fuel pipelines.This is where re-inforcing NATO presence in Europe starts.

  • @anotherman6919
    @anotherman6919 24 дні тому +2

    The Dutch defense should spend a lot more to be an opponent to reckon with

  • @MoviesStuff
    @MoviesStuff Місяць тому

    Great video!

  • @jp-un3fy
    @jp-un3fy Місяць тому +1

    About the natres. They are allound to serve a broad. For security and supporting tasks. But you get ask to volunteer to go abroad. They can not force you.

  • @SimonRaahauge1973
    @SimonRaahauge1973 Місяць тому +1

    the main component of the danish armed forces is the national guard (hjemmeværnet), which wastly outnumbers the standing army. A cheap and efficient way of protecting the homeland. other countries, please take notice of this!

    • @daginn896
      @daginn896 Місяць тому

      We have the same, called heimevernet

  • @pimvg7796
    @pimvg7796 29 днів тому +1

    Hi, sorry to say u forgot the fact that we are one of the few nato members with counter UAS unit operational under DGLC.

  • @diedrikvanderberg8401
    @diedrikvanderberg8401 27 днів тому

    Nice video, thanks! I subscribed to your channel. This video is a bit long though. I like the thoroughness, but I would also like a bit shorter videos. But maybe that's not your aim/goal?

  • @mlaakie
    @mlaakie Місяць тому +4

    Well done. Very informative.

  • @aviationstryker
    @aviationstryker Місяць тому +1

    Amazing video! Do you know where the 900 tanks went? Were they scrapped or sold?

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Thank you!
      That's a story in itself. At the end of the Cold War and the disbandment of many military units throughout Europe, the older Leopard 1's (about half the 900+) were quickly sold or donated. The Dutch had initially planned to keep the Leopard 2's (the other half) as several tank battalions post-Cold War but through the years they kept reducing those units and reselling the Leo 2's to other countries, mostly to other European countries and some to Canada -- until by 2011, they had none.
      The 18 tanks the Dutch have leased from the Germans since 2015 were actually the last ones the Dutch had formerly owned and sold back to Germany, which then upgraded them and leased them to the Dutch.

    • @apertamono
      @apertamono 28 днів тому +1

      Leopard 1s were donated to Greece and sold to Chile, and some were scrapped or repurposed, e.g. as targets. Leopard 2s were sold to Austria, Finland and Norway. Funny detail: Austria (not a NATO ally) didn't demand any quality standards, so it received the tanks that were in the worst condition.

    • @aviationstryker
      @aviationstryker 28 днів тому +1

      @@apertamono Wow! I did not know that! Thank you so much.

  • @JJimsky
    @JJimsky Місяць тому +9

    We may be small, but very well maintained.

  • @MkD_SENS
    @MkD_SENS Місяць тому +4

    they recently ordered additional F-35's

  • @p3d938
    @p3d938 Місяць тому +6

    Dutch are used with joint missions, chief NATO Rutte is on a joint mission.

    • @dutchsailor6620
      @dutchsailor6620 Місяць тому +1

      Rutte is a weasel that shouldn't be trusted.

    • @Wuppie62
      @Wuppie62 Місяць тому

      ​@@dutchsailor6620
      Spotted the FvD-troll.

    • @whoknows8225
      @whoknows8225 Місяць тому

      @@dutchsailor6620 gelukkig is hij hier opgerut :)

  • @BartGielingh
    @BartGielingh Місяць тому

    Great vid.

  • @Oord76
    @Oord76 Місяць тому

    Greetings from the Netherlands!

  • @meintveldman4769
    @meintveldman4769 Місяць тому +2

    I wonder who initiated and financed this promotion for the Dutch armed forces and who it's aimed at.
    Yes, it is informative , well made and even, as far as I can tell true... but as currently the only content on this channel during times in which there is a lot of upheaval about this subject I am suspicious...

  • @ronaldderooij1774
    @ronaldderooij1774 Місяць тому +2

    Well done. I think you are a bit flattering, but still, good content. The challenge now is to divide up the little we have between ourselves, our partners Germany, UK and of course, especially Ukraine.

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Thanks and yes, it isn't big but it's modern and has a lot to do with alliances and partnerships.

  • @arnoutuittenbroek8963
    @arnoutuittenbroek8963 10 днів тому

    Very nice trainset !😀

  • @pyramidsinegypt
    @pyramidsinegypt Місяць тому +4

    I gotta wonder, with the odd intonation and emphasis on words (as if the reader has no idea what words come next or when a sentence ends): are these videos voiced by text-to-speech?

  • @ichneu
    @ichneu День тому

    The Netherlands has 42K soldiers. That is not so many. Of course that is not the point. The Netherlands is a nuclear power with about 250 nuclear missiles, capable of reaching any country, even China. The Americans have about 30 in the Netherlands.

  • @nunyabizniz94
    @nunyabizniz94 Місяць тому

    Really ? This is your first and only video ?
    Come on, make mooooore.
    I liked the taste of this one, so I'm hungry for more.
    Do Belgium next.
    Or expand on the Dutch - UK collaberation.
    And @all: watch Big Mac's Battle Blog, or Brandon Mitchel. They're awesome.

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Indeed, it is. Working on more haha. Thanks!

  • @robbleeker4777
    @robbleeker4777 18 днів тому +1

    The Netherlands is both One of the founders of EU and NATO

  • @BlackLethalDragon
    @BlackLethalDragon 2 дні тому

    As one who tried to get into the Dutch military, i can say with certainty there is a lack of sophisticated selection process.
    There is a strong bias to certain groups of people (non race/sex) and when showing they made an error in process they will ignore you.
    They boast Integrity but they lack it aswel as owning up to their errors.

  • @InfantTree
    @InfantTree 22 дні тому

    5:14 that's incorrect. Dutch forces where deployed in afganistan from 2002 until 2021 and there are still some Dutch officers in support roles deployed in Afganistan.

    • @AmazonWebService98
      @AmazonWebService98 22 дні тому +1

      0 dutch in afghan now and the major combat operation ended then yes, We went back for a police/training mission but it wasn't a combat operation anymore

  • @PBUNO
    @PBUNO Місяць тому +2

    18:30 the Netherlands stores the largest stockpile of B61 nuclear gravity bombs in Europe…as with respect to its nuclear role in the US/Nato nuclear triad

    • @Mark-qw1mt
      @Mark-qw1mt Місяць тому +3

      Volkel airbase is cleared for a maximum of 15 B61 nuclear weapons. This is the maximum number of warheads the storage vaults at the airbase can hold. So 15 max and the actual number of weapons that is stored is classified but is likely less. This is the same number of weapons that are stored in Belgium and Germany. Italy and Turkey are cleared for 20 warheads each so these two countries potentially have more warheads in their bases vaults then the Netherlands. This is the latest information from the Federation of American Scientists from december 2023. Everything is highly classified so things might have changed but your statement that ''the Netherlands stores the largest stockpile of B61 nuclear gravity bombs in Europe'' is nonsence.

    • @PBUNO
      @PBUNO Місяць тому +1

      @ thx for sharing…(my exaggeration was not only ignorance…also trying to make a point ;)

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Ex-PM Lubbers once claimed there were 22 B61's in Volkel AB. Asked for a reaction, a RNLAF spokesman said these ""are never spoken of". www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22840880

  • @MarcoPietersen
    @MarcoPietersen Місяць тому +1

    Note that the new Submarines were signed, but are not allowed tomahawk missles because Washington doesnt trust the french not to steal their design. They may be added afterwards.

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому

      i think we need to forget about america, now that they went full cult....

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому

      It's where the Dutch partners are for. The French aren't building them alone.

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому

      @donenzonen yes, i think we provide i.e. the best naval rafar systems.

  • @Andre_vyent
    @Andre_vyent 12 годин тому

    We maken ons hier niet druk, geen gezeik met andere landen dus :) wel trots op ons leger en de dames en heren die serven Salute

  • @Dutchfr1908-d3d
    @Dutchfr1908-d3d Місяць тому +1

    those new landing class ships the 6 that replace 2 diffirent types will be heavely armed.

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Right now, looks like self-defense weapons only. Transport plus counter-drugs/Caribbean patrols.

  • @koenvangeleuken6544
    @koenvangeleuken6544 Місяць тому

    to be able to scale up significantly, i would think bringing back conscription is the most logical step. that could easily produce a100.000 reserve personnel in a couple of years. Spain has another good trick, i think, to get more soldiers: south americans who join the spanish army get a spanish passport after a couple of years of service. they have of course the great advantage of the common language.....difficult for the dutch to find people wiith the same language...

    • @MChagall
      @MChagall 29 днів тому

      You could offer Dutch courses in training. Kinda like the French foreign legion

    • @dynestis2875
      @dynestis2875 29 днів тому +1

      Conscription?!
      Please NO!
      90% of our populace cries when they have to walk a mile in the rain, or when they have to get out of bed early or are expected to finish their responsibilities before resting.
      Not to mention the woke mindvirus that will spill into one of the final places relatively clean of that nonsense.

  • @rikspring
    @rikspring Місяць тому

    Capabel Defense, great joke your majesty
    7:17the boxer was not designed as a combat vehicle 11:50 the Fennek is severely outdated and not suitable as a combat vehicle, but is suitable as a reconnaissance vehicle or launch platform for anti-tank weapons.

  • @henkdelange3107
    @henkdelange3107 Місяць тому +1

    Unbelievable that the Netherlands had 1000 tanks and 300 fighter jets late 1980s. Defence has to be considered as having an insurance. Ukraine has shown us that we could almost spare no weapons or ordnance.

    • @leonvanwijngaarden2912
      @leonvanwijngaarden2912 21 день тому

      Back then the NATO was much smaller and the Russians where much closer but i agree that it's stil unbelieveble that the goverment made such terrible choises...

  • @amarukud1013
    @amarukud1013 Місяць тому

    My grandfather worked on the leopard 1s and we olso have m109 paladins thed can be put back in working condition in a short time but fore now ar just fore training transporting tanks via truck

  • @BladeTheWatcher
    @BladeTheWatcher Місяць тому +2

    The airforce is OK, the navy is OK-ish, the land army is still ridiculously small. Professional soldiers are so expensive to keep on payroll that few EU country can afford more than a few thousand.
    Seeing that a Soviet-type army can field hundreds of thousands, there is no other way than training up a sizeable reservist force, even if it seems like a huge waste of time for young men (and possibly women).
    Also, let's not forget about the ammo - while the number of F-35s or helicopters seem nice, the whole army is defunct if it runs out of ammo in 2 weeks of fighting. Or food. Or fuel. Logistics is an invisible, but vital part of the army, something the government can't go boasting about, so probably getting underfunded.

    • @TheSuperappelflap
      @TheSuperappelflap Місяць тому

      Possibly? Im not going if they arent. Its equality time. They voted for it. If they dont want to fight then they can cook and clean stuff and repair broken equipment, but I say theyre going, same as the men. Im not going to risk my life for them without any effort from their part, with how theyve been treating men in this country over the past decades.

    • @dynestis2875
      @dynestis2875 29 днів тому +2

      Airforce OK?! We offer top-class airpower when ranked on a global scale!

  • @TeaDrinkingColonist
    @TeaDrinkingColonist 5 днів тому

    we love you nederland

  • @julesdebeckker627
    @julesdebeckker627 9 днів тому

    When the Dutch retire De Zeven Provinciën class, you reckon Belgium might be able to buy one off them or would they be utterly obsolete by then?

  • @joost1094
    @joost1094 Місяць тому +3

    Half of our forces quit when they heard they were about to go on a mission, the other half quit afterwards when they came home by freight plane because the government thought an passenger plane was to expensive and it was corona time so straight to quarantine

  • @erikloupias7642
    @erikloupias7642 26 днів тому

    Marine en luchtmacht tegenwoordig op volle oorlogssterkte houden is voor ons voldoende .Landleger moet voor ondersteuning samenwerken met Duitsland.

  • @idayz.ionetherlands2032
    @idayz.ionetherlands2032 26 днів тому

    Its always nice to know that the enemy knows EXACTLY how much we have of everything.
    Nice that my country is such an open book, that saves our future enemy a whole lot of research...
    Just mark them off as you go..
    Splendid.. thankfully we're in NATO, cause militairy wise we've not surpassed 1940's 'bicycle warfar 101'

  • @Fufu0478
    @Fufu0478 Місяць тому +1

    please make a video about the Turkish army

  • @xEKOy
    @xEKOy 29 днів тому

    2:34, you forgot the islands of; Saba and St. Eustatius.

  • @thetruth7633
    @thetruth7633 Місяць тому +2

    The Dutch Royal Navy I hold in high regard the rest has become a joke. At the end of the 80s we had almost 1000 leopard tanks. In 2024.. a few borrowed tanks from Germany.
    And judging from the number of open jobs nobody is interested in fighting careers anymore.

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi Місяць тому +1

      on the other hand, we saved Billions and billions in costs of unused materials. which makes us quite rich. so now we can basically buy whatever we want.

    • @thetruth7633
      @thetruth7633 Місяць тому +2

      @@CyberBeep_kenshi Maybe we should focus on "simple" matters like compensation for the child benefits affair in The Netherlands. Because if we are not able to solve small matters how can we be trusted with big matters?

    • @UnusSedLeo-w5l
      @UnusSedLeo-w5l Місяць тому +5

      The 'old army' was made for 'old style wars'. Big numbers needed to oppose huge invading forces. Currently, the Dutch Army is very capable of doing specialised tasks, together with allies. This army suits the current, and very changed situation.

    • @fonkyman
      @fonkyman Місяць тому

      @@UnusSedLeo-w5l lol tell that to the russians and chicoms...

    • @JustinRM20
      @JustinRM20 Місяць тому +2

      @@UnusSedLeo-w5l Steadfast Defender 2024 was the biggest NATO exercise since the Cold War. The whole doctrine switch from GWOT back to Cold War started happening since 2022. We're buying tanks, bringing SPGs out of storage, acquiring rocket artillery and increasing readiness levels. These are not signs of a focus on specialized tasks but a clear doctrine shift back to large-scale high intensity conflicts. Ukraine just showed these wars are not relics of history. I'm not saying I believe Russia will invade a NATO state, but not being ready for war has hurt us in the past and can always do so again. I'm assuming with specialized tasks you're talking about our minesweeper focus and SOF from submarines or just our general focus on training for assymetric threats, and some of these can/will still fit well into the new bigger picture.

  • @petertimowreef9085
    @petertimowreef9085 Місяць тому

    I don't really see what we need tanks for, I think increased specialisation of national armies while integrating them on a European level is the way forward. We use German tanks, they use our sensors and marine expertise.

  • @Sebastianfnc
    @Sebastianfnc Місяць тому

    I am from the Netherlands and a proud that we as a small nation work closely with our neighbors and not the US for me personally it’s become clear that the us wants a radical religious Christian dictatorship under Trump, I would have some hope for a Harris administration but….. the world is better of with out a Christian,putting loving pathetic blode us president who’s only interest is not to get convinced. I applaud Europe for following the current events and in doing so supporting Ukraine more importantly strengthening the EU defenses!
    Let me be clear the current events shows us that the accords made for the un after WW2 have failed, especially concerning the security council witch includes us Russia and china, if one suggest one thin the rest will veto this and as such it needs to be restructured and all tree need to be kicked out of it and replaced by a temporary council with a government who has been elected by the people in a free election ( and I don’t care if it’s left, right or trough the middle, the voters decide)
    The current events shows the world that it is time for a new un character with out the us, Russia or china leading the Assembly of the free world

  • @christianbell1357
    @christianbell1357 Місяць тому

    im dutch and i knew none of this
    liked and subscribed

    • @DefenseIndex
      @DefenseIndex  Місяць тому

      Thank you for liking and subscribing.

  • @nuribayram6740
    @nuribayram6740 Місяць тому +2

    18TH GDP, and 13TH GDP per capita

  • @phdp65
    @phdp65 Місяць тому +4

    There is still shortage of ammunition.

    • @UndercoverPirate69
      @UndercoverPirate69 Місяць тому +5

      or that's what they want the adversaries to think to be true

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому +1

      Nah the soldiers can just yell "bang bang" when training 😂

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому +2

      ​@@UndercoverPirate69I can assure you it's not.

    • @dynestis2875
      @dynestis2875 29 днів тому +1

      No, there is definitely a shortage of ammunition, both actual and exercize.​@@UndercoverPirate69

  • @armrarr
    @armrarr Місяць тому +7

    wanna take our land, go ahead,, bring boats and waterproof clothing ;)

  • @niels5145
    @niels5145 Місяць тому

    as far as i know there are several problems with the new subs firing tomahawks. There is no permission of the USA to implement the systems needed to fire the tomahawk from the new french subs causing major upset on top of an already controversial path to buy french instead of building dutch systems or buy german.

    • @NicoSteentjes
      @NicoSteentjes Місяць тому

      The Dutch are no longer capable of building subs (that company went backrupt in the 90's). You mean a Swedish sub (the name Damen was only there for the illusion of the sub being Dutch).

    • @niels5145
      @niels5145 Місяць тому +2

      the dutch are more then capable of building subs, it would require some industry upgrades but knowhow (and knowledge) are available.

  • @PixelPhobiac
    @PixelPhobiac 28 днів тому

    We currently don't have any tanks though, we lease them from Germany

  • @olivierfaber8478
    @olivierfaber8478 Місяць тому

    We need a massive drone army and huge stockpile longrange missile stuff . Like Russia if all tanks are gone they still can shoot missiles for years..

    • @donenzonen
      @donenzonen Місяць тому

      We are investing in drone tech. Recently a factory was opened in the Netherlands as a joint effort with Ukraine

  • @matthieubaron9733
    @matthieubaron9733 Місяць тому

    did you forget the Commando`s? our green berets

  • @_onegames
    @_onegames 27 днів тому

    fun fact the netherland has retired the f16 about 1 to 2 months ago

  • @j.d.trenning883
    @j.d.trenning883 28 днів тому +1

    Great video and true the Dutch armed forces get new, good material with two exceptions that are bad decisions. First to buy the new subs in France by Naval in stead of buying the proposal of SAAB-Damen. That French design is the same design that Australia rejected after many problems and choosed for U.S. build nucleair subs.
    Buying the iveco Manticore what is a real bad vehicle, is the other bad decision. Our Belgian brothers in Arms have also iveco's and they have only tchnical problems with them. The German build Dingo was a better option.
    Last but not least the Dutch armed forces should be asap get rid of the VW Amarok wich is a nice vehicle but not for armed forces. Maybe at an military airport or a naval base but not for the Army.

  • @marijnnn4992
    @marijnnn4992 Місяць тому +1

    The dutch cold war army was carzy big how did that even fit in the country

    • @TheSuperappelflap
      @TheSuperappelflap Місяць тому +2

      Lots of barracks in all the cities, even the small ones. Most of those are now closed or converted to office space, schools, housing for refugees, etc.

    • @TomGerritsen-o9r
      @TomGerritsen-o9r Місяць тому +1

      And there was a lot of US personnel stationed in the Netherlands as well!
      For example the USAF, 32 Tactical Fighter Squadron ‘Wolfhounds’ at airport Soesterberg.
      Tank exercises were done a lot in Germany, more space!

  • @AA-ks7bo
    @AA-ks7bo Місяць тому

    i guess "compact but capable" is one way to say the koninklijke landmacht went from over nearly 900 tanks and 2000 IFVs to barely 124 IFVs in 10 years.

    • @bunherr8974
      @bunherr8974 Місяць тому +1

      Thanks to the leftist government :)