Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- Edifier S2000MKIII on amazon DE: amzn.to/359sjDs
Edifier S3000Pro on amazon DE: amzn.to/2W4LmuC
Edifier S3000Pro on amazon UK: amzn.to/3cNjdPb
Edifier S3000Pro on bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2CSBVow
------------------------------
Follow me on:
Instagram - / digitalstereophony
Facebook - / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
Contact me at:
digitalstereophony@gmail.com
----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using pair of SE Electronics SE8 mics and Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral - Наука та технологія
> 11:40 < Detailed Frequency Response Graphs
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony/
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony/
更新下 曲库 吧
S3000 pro is in dinamyc source?
@@cristianchocobar2499 i think he records in Monitor but can’t understand why because S3000 pro’s default mode when turning on is Classic.
Robisz świetną robotę ;)
They sound great. You can definitely hear the extra size in the S3000's and the depth that gives you, but no points lost to the s2000's. Think I'm gonna pick up those S2000's right away here
Listening on the s2000MKIII and man these speakers pack an insane amount of quality and sound for the price, especially if you find a good pair on the resell market, I am in love with these!!!
I am proud owner of both. I owned s2000 mkiii for a year and I can tell you that these has absolute clear and nice sound. Now I couldn't resist and bought S3000Pro. I have both next to each other and comparing sound for two days. And it is hard to say really as both got its advantages and sounds different.
But I have to say that s2000 mkiii are better for richer mids and not so disturbing highs as S3000Pro has. S3000Pro suits more to living room. s2000 mkiii should be in bigger box and that's it. Maybe in the next version.
Really trying to give the S3000 more credit but the S2000 sounds just better.
Witch are louder?
@@wojtekjarecki The s3000pro are louder, but the s2000mkiii go loud enough they will damage your hearing at high volume. I own both and the s2000mkiii seems to have a faster more attacking bass. The s3000pro sounds a bit clearer but the clarity sounds a bit artificial, vocals sound slightly mechanical, it can also be heard in this recording. The s2000mkiii has more muffled vocals.
It's amazing how close the S2000MKIIIs sound to the original...
Six months in and I love my R1850db's, which I paired with an Edifier sub from a much smaller and less audiophile-quality system. Great combination and couldn't be happier. Thanks, Digital Stereophony, for the terrific side-by-sides that helped make the decision for me.
Does the 1850 distort at max volume?
@@-MarkWinston- Yes and it *is* relatively easy to bottom them at max SPL. It doesn't usually effect me because I'm in a small apartment, but they're definitely not for thrash-metal parties with sixty of your closest friends.
@@CinemaDemocratica with the bass knob set at 0, roughly at what volume percentage do the start distorting? I wont need to set the bass anything higher than 0 (maybe negative) because I plan on running it with an Elac 1010 sub. What size is your apartment btw in meters? Thank you so much in advance, really need some feedback on these speakers before getting them. Not many speakers have a sub out, this, the r2750db and the new r2850db only has em but I cant get the r2xxx in the country im living in
@@-MarkWinston- I honestly don't know, since my front end has a separate volume adjustment. I'll fiddle round with it tonight if I remember.
@@CinemaDemocratica thank you so much!
Thank you so much for your awesome comparison's mate. You just saved me some money by helping me choose the cheaper version which sounds as good as the S3000 Pro
I assume U already have the S2000MKII, how do you rate so far in terms of overall sound?
Yup reply please? Is S2000MKII better?
Its very subjective. I like the visceral sound of s3000pro. Mkiii is not anything behind. Its more accurate thoungh.
Extraordinarily similar considering the price differences, though the S3000 plays deeper and sounds a little more open. S3000 definitely takes this in a straight up comparison, especially in larger spaces. In a smaller space, the S2000MKIII may be the better choice though.
Hi guys, U got the best idea about HiFi testing on planet ! Speaking about sound is to subjective and pointless. If I may suggest something, please change presentation order: 1. Original track 2. First set. 3. Original track. 4. Second set. 5. First set. I think it would be the best way to hear the difference between original tracks and both sets. Keep up the good work and switch on the support channel option !
Thank you, I was waiting for this one !
I prefer the more open sound of the S3000.
I like Vocal preset with -2-3db on high.
@@LokiOdinson is "Dynamic" with -3 or -4db treble good?
@@JoshyLats Dynamic makes to much bass. And speakers start to play with much harmonics on low freq.
@rockn roll Yes, it's closer to the source track without the sharp highs of the S3000's
what's weird I thought is that on the track "Man on fire" I liked the sound of the S3000 more. I thought they sounded more airy and I liked the crisp treble. But then when the source file played it actually sounded more like the S2000's haha. They both sound great
Amazing work
I love the comparisons you do
Can you please do a
Edifier s2000mkiii vs klipsch R51pm
I'm listening to this on my S3000Pro's, which I bought because of your awesome channel. Keep up the great work! You deserve way more subs.
The S3000Pro's have a small, but noticeable amount of depth and "space" over the S2000MKIII's. However for almost half the price the S2000MKIII's sound fantastic, and to me are miles ahead of others in its price range. I'm probably buying the S2000MKIII's for a second bedroom for a TV setup now. Thanks again.
how do the MKiii sound on your TV set up ? and or the s3000Pro's....thx...cheers
@@GOLFADDICT65 I have the MKIII and they sound awesome for movies and series as well. They spit so much detail and clarity at you it's insane. Also nice an deep bass. Play movies in Dynamic mode and you will not be disappointed. Of course placement and room acoustics make up 50% of your sound...
I didn't knew about edifer, the last one i used was gigaworks s750 with desktop. But now with laptop and after becoming a father it was difficult to have some multiple channel system. So i was looking for some 2.0 or 2.1 system. Was planning for s1000mkii but that was market out in my country, so setteled down to r1855db. After after one week of use and listening to your comparisions, sold the r1855db and just got myself the s2000mkiii. Though it cost more than my old 7.1 s750, but happy with the buy. The music really shine in these speakers. I am now confused, how those little pc speakers have so much wattage in so small footprint!
Just bought and listening with S2000MKIII I am very please with the overall sound of S2000MKIII for this price I can afford.
Thanks! Great way to compare
my favourite, by far, is the source track :D
cheers!! great comparison
NICE VIDEO!!
Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO vs Edifier S1000MKII PLEASE:3
Hi. Very nice videos you have on your channel. I'm thinking of buying studio monitors for mixing. What would you recommend? Edifier like monitors, or KRK, or else? My budget around being 500$. So for mixing and mastering what?
Actually while the S3000Pro are a bit more punchier in the basses (thanks to the bigger woofer) but not deeper, the S2000 midrange is more natural respect to the S3000Pro which has a little "horn" effect. Both are very good. But they lack some midrange musicality, they are a little bit dry.
Completely agree. They don’t sound as warm and do lack midrange. But really can’t complain when it’s at this price point. Excellent excellent value
I own a r2000db and s3000 pro, and both are superb speakers, very happy with Edifier brand.
Hi. Do you think it's worth upgrading from S1000db to S3000 pro?
@@nimishrastogi172 yes, the difference is big
@@angelostselios Im worried about the absence of subout. Can they handle heavy bass tracks like techno and edm? At high volume.
@@nimishrastogi172 s3000pro is a beast. The bass is insane. The mid is really clear. The sound stage is huge with no distortion at all.
@@manuelf.almeida yes s3000pro can.
I was thinking about getting the R2000DB, but after watching this video, I ordered the S2000MKIII. Better sound, more solid remote, LED display, Bluetooth 5, better Amp, for the extra $150.00.
i have both R2000DB and S2000MKIII.... MKIII much better! good choice
Which is better @Danny?
@@markpelayo MKIII... not an expert, but much more solid sound and fills the room
@@markpelayo mk3
@@babushkinvnuk bought s3000 pro and return them and took the s2000 mkiii .sound good to my ears
These sound very similar but the S3000 just sound a little better to me. After watching all your videos I think the Tannoy Gold 8's are still my favorite. Would love to see the Gold 8 vs S3000 as i will be getting them soon. Keep up the good work, great videos.
Yeah Gold 8s were my favourite too. HS8s are very close 2nd. Sorry to say but the s3000pro will sound crap compared to the Gold 8s cos their bass is even warmer than HS8s which already humiliated the s3000pros a few weeks ago.
Unless Digital Stereophony does some equaliser adjustments on s3000pro to increase bass and lower treble.
@@JoshyLats Are the Gold 8s good for desktop music listening? Or are they for professional use? Thanks
have you ever tested s1000mkii vs. s2000mkiii?whats difference between of these?
The S2000mk3 is good and opinions say the same, but in the video comparison with the s1000mk2 many people said that the s1000 sounds better. Maybe the sound mode varies in each video, what modes do you aply in the s2000 videos?
Long time subscriber here. Would be great to know wich one would you consider a better upgrade from the old S2000 pro's. I tend to think S2000 mkiii because i'm afraid that the wifi solution in S3000pro will kill some sound quality(considering i use a great DAC) and some people have connection drop problems. I use the S2000 pro with treble boosted to 2-3 a'clock. More controlled bass and cleaner, clearer, more open midrange and refined highs are what i'm looking for. Also better dinamics and kick are very important to me.
A channel from Russia made this comparison. Result: S2000mkiii is a winner according to my ears. Better highs and mids. Same bass response. I would say easily on par with 3000pro, minus the extra bass. Altough some people find the highs bright, and mids a bit more in the background of 2000mkiii and 3000pro, I personally prefer it this way. Because, tuning down is always better versus tuning up. Plus they do not have the same specs. S2000mkiii is triamped, it has the new tuning adjustment like 3000pro. And you have extra 6watts rms treble.
2000 pro does not exist..
I love all your test comparison!, please consider to obtain a pair of KEF LS50 Wireless, would be so interesting to compare with the Edifier speakers.
Yes bring it on, that's a very interesting comparison.
LS50W is on par for the SQ when comparing to S3000 Pro, but the price is much higher with LS50W, i think alot of the cost goes into the brand name and the look of the speaker for LS50W.
@@photovideooz4084 hello, klipsch the fives or edifier s2000 mk3 for movies ando music? Thanks!!!!
Basically identical tone, you just get more LF extension and more "air" with the bigger brother. The only thing that worries me with the S3000 is the wireless interconnect. It adds another layer of latency between signal input and driver output, as there is a brief master speaker output delay to synchronize outputs between speakers. I'd much rather see a cable between speakers. Since the slave has a hard wired power cord anyway, the wireless interconnect is sort of pointless.
NAh , Wireless all the way!, There is basically no difference and you will notice that having the freedom of no wire adds an extra dimension in your brain that will have another kind of positive knock on effect to your consumer experience... just need to have a plug socket handy but thats a different thing to knowing you will ultimately have to run that wire from wherever you put that speaker to the other.. So when you think about how important placement is, thousands of people out there would much prefer the S3000 and splash that (not in audiophile$$$s) extra $$.. In fact, what it would mean is , you will find yourself playing music in rooms you never would have bothered to try,. And that opens up eway more possibilites.
@@Bootrosgali
Listening this on a Sony MHC-RG290 2x120watts rms and i can't see a difference...they both sound great OR the sound has been diffused due to conversion...ohh seen a difference on the jazz at 8:00 part...and i was thinking in upgrading this unit with one of the 2 here...guess i'll be sticking with mine for a bit longer...Both units are great...Thank you
DS - I purchased the 2000mkiii over the 3000 due to price and a review I read about the left and right speaker having slight lag issues. A replacement pair fixed it and they didn't have it any longer but have you come across any issues with disconnect between the speakers? Wondering if I shouldn't just have ponied up for the extra cost on the 3000s
You don't like your MK3's than? Note, they do sound different after a while. I had to reduce bass and increase treble a bit. I think in Dynamic mode they run pretty deep. Although MK3's go loud, the S3000's should go way louder but they have this strong emphasis on the treble which doesn't work for me.
@@rdolle990 i've the same experience. But they stille have to burn in a while... I had to increase the treble and reduce the bass in the dynamic mode . I have them for 3 weeks now and the sound changed a lot over this period. I play them for 1 hour at a day..Sometimes i miss something but I can 't describe it.... Don't get me wrong, it's a good speaker especially with cd or high res music . The germans call this ..das gewisse etwas....I hope it changes over time.
@@marcohermans3207 Perhaps I know what you mean. A lot of speakers have an increased boost in the upper base to make them sound a little warmer and make them "rumble" a bit more. Systems tuned this way are a little more forgiving for bad recordings. The S2000MKIII don't have this boost to a high extend. However, with boosting that section, they sacrifice a lot of detail and depth in the low end. I was rather surprised how much more detail in the low end the S2000MKIII has over other speakers I have owned. It's a very "clean" speaker.
S2000MKIII is closer to reference track and measurements are slightly more flat than S3000Pro.
Great videos, since you are familiar with both, Klipsch Fives or the S2000Mkiii? I am able to buy either for the same price where I am
Hola amigo, que has comprado? Y porque elegiste ese? Saludos
between these 2 which would be better for TV movies and everyday TV ? thx all...cheers from Vulcan Canada
Considering to return the S2000 MKIII and getting S3000 pro instead ^^
Edit: Got the S3000Pro, they are quite the step up. The 2000 could've used a sub, the 3000 are shaking my desk apart with no need for a sub.
I did the exact same thing! No regrets whatsoever on the sound aspect. The bass sounds deeper and the highs were a lot cleaner, especially if you crank the volume up in a living room. If I had to fault anything is that the S3000Pros is a slightly old technology design. Compared to the S2000MKIIIs, I noted: 1) the display panel of the S3000s was a lot smaller (your selected mode is not visible when youre sitting back); 2) the display panel on the S3000Pro doesn't conveniently show the volume you are at - each time had to be careful to "dial down" before switching inputs e.g. from phone to vinyl player etc... 3) the S3000 doesnt remember the sound mode you are in i.e. you have to keep selecting "Dynamic"/your preferred mode - that said, I and also others have commented that we cannot distinguish between the sound modes lol
@@xpynuker just working out which ones to get, to my ear they sound very similar.
Are you saying that the S3000pro don't remember the sound profile but the S2000mkiii do?
Considering the price difference here in Australia $599 vs $1099 thinking of getting the 2000
No big diferences, but i like more s300
soundstage seems wider with s3000pro but they also sound a bit too bright. maybe some eq is enough to get rid of that brightness. but with flat settings s2000mkiii have a more pleasant sound for me.
when u own 3000 u can do any that u say :))) I agree with u and using my 3000 with Vocal preset and -3db on High Freq.
I would really like to see a Edifier T5 Subwoofer test. It seems impossible to find in Europe.
Z Reviews did. It's an affordable ported average sub.
In the Netherlands you can find those.
Can you do some comparisons involving the Klipsch fives / Sevens / Nines …..would be awesome
do I win anything with an upgrade from my brand new s2000 mkiii to s3000 pro (if it's a good bargain)? I do love pretty much everything about these little boomboxes. The only thing probably is that on volume over 35 I have to reduce bass due to the sound distortions (mostly on some rap and trap soundtracks), yet it doesn't annoy that much. So, what do you say?
Both have about the same sound profile. However, the S3000 has a little more bass and more power. To me, from this video, S3000 had bigger/wider imaging. So if you are a loud rap and trap listener you might want to give it a go with the S3000
S3000 just looks so much fatter and meaner than S2000! And its USB implementation is excellent. Significantly more clarity, detail, openess and definition but slightly less punch vs Klipsch The Fives via AptX. Almost close to Neumann KH120 / Dynaudio Focus 110A - losing out slightly in overall detail, and also control/some port noise at extreme bass excursion - otherwise v v close at normal volume. Thinking if I should get a 2nd pair. . .
What is the best active powered speaker in this price range?
Hi, I love your videos and compraision. I wanted to ask you about what could be your recommendation in my case. Currently I have an Edifier R1900TII, and I was thinking to jump for a Makie 524, JBL 305P MKII, or this Edifier S2000MKIII (more expensive, and I have to double check my desk space for that last one).
What would be your recommendation (or maybe, alternative from other brands/models)?.
Thanks.
I would recommend S2000MKIII as it will be the easiest transition from your current speakers. S2000MKIII sounds as good as JBL and Mackie, is build to much higher standard and has much richer set of features. It will also take same amount of space compared to JBL
@@DSAUDIOreview Thank you for your recommendation, I did it and I´m surprised of the sound quality and build quality (impressive bass).
Anyways I have a question, your test were done using analog connector (RCA) or using Coaxial / Toslink?, because I noted some lack of treeble, even after I adjust it trough the back controller with lower volume,
Thank you.
@@andysim1398 they were connected via analog inputs. If you find them lacking in treble than try to use dynamic mode
Hey can you do a Edifier S1000MKII BOXE vs Edifier S2000MK III test?
Was planning to upgrade from kali Lp6's to yamaha hs8s now im getting the s2000mkiii wow look at that graph and price Im ordering theese babys right now... Love this channel.
Update: they arrived yesterday and I did a quick listen an wow best speakers I ever owned, my settings are -5 bass due to being on top of a dresser and +3 treble. But they sound better with my topping e30 dac....I had mackies m524s and sound similar for what I remember I might be wrong, that would be a good comparison.
Give then 50 hours of play time, highs will get smoother and more detailed and the low end gets deeper with more detail as well.
@@rdolle990 I been listening on the classic mode with bass all the way down because I placed them on a dresser on the wall, before I had them on monitor mode before but treble was a little muted and the knob doesn't really make a difference, I was actually gonna returned them because I thought they were defeated but read the questions on amazon and other people said the same.
@@spicyshotzhd4020 Dynamic mode opens up mids and treble even more but you will also get more low end.
AWSOME if you can do S3000 Pro v AirPulse A300
People commenting that the s2000 is almost as good. I don't know what your listening on, but I'm hearing quite a difference. Your also getting a speaker with a bigger woofer, more power and a better tweeter. Yes, it's more expensive but it's hands down a better speaker
s3000 pro tweeters are less powerful (8+8 w) and s2000 pro has beefier tweeters (15+15 w) .. how much does this feel in real life scenarios?
Hi how would you connect the S2000mk3 to a Mac mini set up? Thank you.
Aux to RCA
also USB to toslink/coaxial adapter, if you listen hi res audio check if the adapter supports that.
In the track bellissimo S3000pro destroyed S2000mkiii by quite good margin in terms of depth and sound stage madness OMG. S3000pro ahead of its time.
please compare s2000 pro with s2000 mk3
Please digital stereophony help , what to buy for listening music and tv in 40m2 room , S2000MKiii or JBL 305P MKii + dac ? Are they loud enough ? Tnx for answering , i am enjoying listening to this comparasions...
Get S2000MKIII, it will be better fit for your needs and should be loud enough
@@DSAUDIOreview tnx for advice. One more question , do i need some extra DAC for them or not ?
No, you don't
i have genelec8040b . i am not pro engineer and just a audiophile. i think pro audio speaker cant fit for people listening music ‘cause pro speaker is just boring sound and cant exactly enjoy music. so i think using hifi speaker is better than pro speaker for audiophile
I have both. I am a lucky guy 🤩
@Digital stereography, between the s3000pro and the s2000Mkiii which do you prefer for Music listening in a typical home living room, say seated about 10 to 12 feet away from the speakers?
S3000Pro by a very small margin. Both are good though
@@DSAUDIOreview Thanks for the reply. When You say by a very small margin. By what aspect of the sound qualty of the s3000pro makes it slightly better than the s2000mkiii.
I prefer a slightly warmer overall tonal balance which aids in fatigue free listening over longer sessions. I am put off by a brighter tonality.
My current audio setup is with a jolida tube CD player and a jolida tube amplifier, IFI Zen blue DAC running CADENCE DIVA Speakers. The CADENCE are extremely transparent speakers and my tube based setup gives me a warm overall tonality.
Over my various listening sessions of your Video I found the s2000mkiii to be more full bodied, rounded and warmer but less spacious whereas the S3000pro sounded a bit thinner and dry and were brighter but sounded more open and spacious. However listening to the video might not portray a 100 percent accurate picture. Since you have listened in detailed to both, do you concur with my views, or Am I missing something.
@@agnelroshandsilva3929 Not sure if either both of them can compete with your current high end setup....
@@rdolle990 just an Update. I have both.
The s3000pro being driven by the zen dac comes very close to My setup. The zen dac perfectly complements the splendid but active top end of the planar tweeter while even further expanding the Soundstage with a very detailed yet warm and relaxing sound. And ohh yes the zen dac has that truly exceptional true bass circuit which brings out subwoofer levels of bass from the s3000pro without muddying the rest of the frequency range.
The s2000mkiii I am driving through a topping e30 dac. The topping e30 further improves on the stellar midrange of the s2000mkiii and opens up the Soundstage nicely while adding a bit of top end sparkle.
I feel that both speakers have excellent and overachieving drivers for their price, specially that planar tweeter is a really well implemented marvel. However while the onboard DACS are good matching the speakers with better external dacs does greatly improve the sound.
@@agnelroshandsilva3929 Hey man! Which one would you recommend to a room like 18-20m^2 where the speakers would be 3-3.5 meters from you? I'm afraid that s2000mkiii might not sound good though
I listen this on S360DB model, oh it's so juicy!
I'm no audiophile. Could someone explain how they sound so similar but the s3000 has almost double the wattage ?
10:26
What is the name of the music and where do I get it?
Very close but still like the Yammy HS8 infinitely over both of these. Do you have a swans M3a or M5a to compare against?
Yes, Yammy's are great but with the lack of having DSP, I wonder what their sweet spot at the volume dial is.
Which one is the best input for s2000mkiii/s3000pro, optical toslink or rca cable? I am planning to used it for my pc 😅
Optical better than rca, but rca itself can easily play well with 192k 24bits music files
Sir, pleas answer me ..in edfier r1850 bt the wire that connects the four-way speaker is in the edfier s3000 pro five-way .. what is the difference?
S3000PRO has no wire connecting the speakers. Speakers are connected wirelessly via Bluetooth 5.0
@@DSAUDIOreview
I apologize for the error in my question .. I wanted to ask what is the difference between the connecting wire between edfier r1850 and edfier s1000..Thank you for answering my question..your distinguished channel..a good luck
@@amersaab5826 Same connection mate. Same 4 wires. That just issue at Edi web, that's it.
@@LokiOdinson
Thank you for your answer
The speakers are NOT connected.to each other using bluetooth 5.0, they are connected using a different technology. Look it up.
please do s1000mkii and s2000mkiii comparing.everyone waiting
For the second time tonight, I still like the edifier s2000 mkiii. They already beat out the q acoustics 3030i imo now the 3000pro. Not so much beating the 3000pro as just being half the price and liking them just as well. The 3000 have a little more detail and a little more open but I think they sound a little thinner also. I think the s2000 mkiii are far away the better value.
From what my ears can hear, i agree with you. The S3000 have a slightly better detailed sound but for overall sound quality the s2000 sounds better.
The s2000mkiii did not beat the 3030i, period.
@@-MarkWinston- I'm afraid they did, sir.
@@Frip36 go have a look at the graphs of both speakers. FR, directivity, decay, distortion, dispersion, evwrything goes to the Q.
@@-MarkWinston- except maybe how they sounded to my ears 🤣
I have the edifier 3000pro there the best speakers I have 🎶🕺
I’ve owned the 2000’s for a few years. Love them! However, no sub out is infruiating.
Haha, I'm listening to it on the S3000. The two are almost indistinguishable. The slight difference is that the S3000 is more powerful.
It's very difficult to hear a quality difference imho. They sound a bit different, but I can't say which one is better? Hmm.
I have the s2000mk3, Do you think that updating to the s3000 will notice a great improvement? Thanks
Nope. There is no significant improvement
@@DSAUDIOreview thanks
I think the main difference is that the s3000pro has a bit of a boost in the midrange between 2 and 4khz. This can be perceived as more clear but the s2000 mkiii sounds smoother in that area. Its pretty noticable with vocals.
With some music this peak could become slightly fatiguing.
any suggestion on buying these vs Kanto yu6 or Audioengine A5+ for desktop speakers ?
One of these. Also, S2000MKIII is better value for money IMO
@@DSAUDIOreview Thanks! do you know if its possible to hook a sub up to a S2000MKIII? And would Games sound ok on them? Sorry for the noob questions.
@@shannon1872 No sub out on MKIII but if positioned correctly they can run down to 38 Hz which can only be exceeded by expensive subs. Movies sound great as well. When played on the loud side, they make the windows in my cabinets rattle...
Hi, DS! Which is better: Edifier S2000MKIII or Airpulse A200?
A200 soundwise
@@DSAUDIOreview Thanks for the help in choosing 😉
the 3000s do have more about them but enough to justify the hike in price? granted this is just a representation of the speakers through mics , through the web , in it off what ever speakers/phones we are listening to them through. fella on Z reviews absolutely loved them (he's a bit mad in his reviews lol) but he preferred after testing the swan M300 mostly due to price .
I don't know what is the best set of speakers, but s3000pro are wireless and because of that thet are more expensive than m300
In Indonesia the price of s2000mkiii if i converted into US Dollar is around 430 usd, and s3000pro is around 710 usd. My question, is it worthed adding more 210 usd from s2000mkiii to s3000pro? Is s3000pro sound quality far more superior than s2000mkiii?
Get S2000MKIII. I actually like the sound of it more so I would not spend any extra on S3000Pro
Jadi nya ambil yang mana bang ?
@@wisnuutomo1003 akhirnya ambil S2000MKiii kak overall puas bgt, lumayan bedanya selisih harganya hampir 4jt. Setelah liat banyak review bedanya dengan s3000pro dia punya bass yg lebih punchy (watt lebih besar) dan koneksi ke speaker pasifnya tanpa kabel.
@@Rapha194 s2000mkiii is upgraded version of s2000pro, i compared with my friend s2000pro. S2000mkiii bass more deep than s2000pro 😃
@@thehangat halo bang bnyak yang saranin ditambah TOPPING E30 DAC suara speaker edifier ny nambah joss boleh dicoba dlu bang nanti saya minta reviewny wkwkwkk
Can we make a comparison video on f&D r60bt. m from india
The S3000's stage is bigger 08:15
But the make some strange hill in the mid and hi-mid range, 1kHz, 2kHz, 7kHz and above 12kHz slope down.
Do you have any plan that you will fix your room acoustic?:-)
I am not moving to anechoic chamber nor am I changing my livingroom into one ;)
@@DSAUDIOreview And even if you did you know people would still complain. Why would you test in an anechoic chamber when we play our speakers in regular rooms? Youre setup is great as is. Just moving the speakers around a bit and adjusting the mic will already greatly change the sound and is free and easy. Plus many manufacturers put their response graphs from an anechoic chamber in their manuals.
@@DSAUDIOreview 😂
If you're watching this just do yourself a favor and get the S2000MKIII, unless you're a baller then go for the S3000Pro. It's an easy decision. And yes, this is much better than going with the R1700BT.
I began this journey thinking I was for sure going to get the R1280Ts and call it a day. Thanks to this channel, I'm very happy I ultimately went with the S2000MKIII's. Edifier makes good products all around but this is their sweetest spot and latest tech. I'm actually thinking of where I can put another set.
Yes I can confirm, having the S2000MKIII and the R1850DB with a closed 10" Tannoy sub. The S2000MKIII has much more clarity, sounds way cleaner and dives deeper in a very detailed and controlled way.
Care to explain your decision and may i ask you about s350db and s360db?
I began my search 2 months ago looking for replacement for my Corsair SP 2500 finally shorted out. Burnt smells everywhere. It served me and my family well for the past 7 years or so, and im satisfied by it.
At 1st im looking at s350db as replacement, but then i watch this channel discovering new and new things, now im freaking confused. S2000mkiii, s360db or else?
My budgets only allowed me to stretched as far as s2000mkiii or s360db price range.
@@SPE143 have you decided yet? I'm a pc gamer, music listener, movie watcher, and I'm so torn between de S360DB and the S2000MKII.
@@razorhanny i found the other way around it. Cost me less. In my living room there were a set of 5.1 home theater system of Yamaha NS series. It was not too old, not too new around 10 years old. But it is a great quality Yamaha home theater system. I took apart the bookshelf (Surround speaker) NS B500, from the home theather set and put them at my pc. Leaving my home theather set with 2.1 system and still sound great, barely missing anything. And my pc now got a high quality great sounding Yamaha set + random decent subwoofer. I dont know how to compared Yamaha NS B500 compared to Edifier S2000mkiii. Open sounding. Crystal clear treble. Solid mid. The frequency response is 50hz- 50khz. So it is not going as low as the S2000/3000. Thats why i just put a random sub to get that low deep rumbling bass. Yeah this will be my pc sound setup until they no longer work anymore which i am very confident will be very very long time. My dad also own a set of yamaha speaker which i believed to be as old as myself. So yeah.
So...about s360db and s2000mkiii, i cant help much. But if i didnt go for this route, i definately go for s2000mkiii. Better sounding than s360db.
If you 360db u got 2 speakers and a sub and thats that. End of it.
If you go for s2000mkiii you got a better sounding 2 speaker and if not satisfied can always open to add subwoofer if you want. There is a room for addition. Just need a lil bit of work around as there is no sub out on s2000mkiii port.
@@SPE143 that sounds awesome. Enjoy!
sound almost identical, S3000 slightly more bass
Listening to this a third time at a different time. I can hear a slight sibilance in the mkiii that is not present on the 3000. Such a small but important difference if you hear it. But the price difference. Ouch. The sibilant "bite" is present on the 3000 in the song @3:30 as well but worse on the mkiii. If it were my money this would be a hard decision. I would probably try the mkiii and see how I like them and if in person I still hear the sibilant notes and it affects my enjoyment I would probably send it back. But I don't think I would pay $800 for the 3000. I guess at the money I make an hour and that price, I don't feel it's worth it. On sale for $600 I might nibble.
Good call on the sibalance. You are right.
Here in Brazil the S3000 pro costs more than 8 months worth of minimum wage.
OH! Finaly! Tnx man! im appreciate it! Edi make new 2000 very good and balanced speakers. On my 3000 i set -2-3db at HF. But 2000 came stock like i like, relaxed high.
That 3rd harmonic on 2000MK2 not good at all....
@rockn roll Running S2000mk3 in my 50 m2 living room, I can tell these are not for near field only. The treble is not overactive or sharp at all, I even added a bit (running in Dynamic mode). If you order these at Amazon you can always return them if you dislike them. Note, their sound changes a bit after burn in, specially the low end becomes a little deeper and more detailed. I noticed the price fluctuates a lot. At Amazon.nl €470,- now, got them for €340,- but I think that was a little mistake :)
S2000MKIII supposed to be Hi Res but sounded more muffled? The S3000 sounds better to me, listening to this on Creative T4
Hi res is just a marketing buzzword.
@@gullibleskeptic3237 its not if its able to play aptx hd, ldac, flac, etc. Anything that is able to play higher than 44.1hz SR and 16 bit is hi res audio
@@-MarkWinston- yes but my point is that all of that is just pointless numbers and doesnt make any real difference. Maybe bats hear a difference higher then 44.1khz 16bit files but for humans its more then enough.
@@gullibleskeptic3237 I can clearly hear a difference between something like aptx and aptx hd. Very huge difference in spaciousness, clarity and seperation. Some are so deaf they cant hear a difference between mp3 and ldac.
@@-MarkWinston- lol no you cant. All you hear is confirmation bias.
And dont you mean mp3 vs flac? People cant even seem to reliably distinguish between a 320kbp spotify stream a flac file and a youtube stream. confirmation bias or placebo effect is extremely powerfull you know.
If youre convinced something must be better youre dopamine will rise when seeing or hearing that thing. Only blind tests can overcome this.
so, after a few moths of experience with s3000 pro I decided to return to s2000 mkiii. I was so eager to advance to a300, but looks like I can't handle this price barrier in my head, that's just way too much for me and they're not that easily placed in a room which brings me additional business.
Hello, why do you prefer s2000 over s3000 pro?
@@AdamMrozek84 s 2000 mkiii has better clarity at midrange (actually the main reason), softer highs, the low range is less accurate than s3000 pro's, but sometimes feels deeper. In addition, s2000 mkiii has a better indicator panel which is not crucial, however a good addition I'd say. The overall sound picture is quite close, but to my ear, the smaller brother is more comfortable and it just annoys me less) Additionally, the price difference is quite significant, in my country at least.
@@user-on4bj2tr8f Thank you very much for such a comprehensive answer. How big is your room?
@@user-on4bj2tr8f how do the s2000MKiii sound on the TV for movies etc......thx....cheers
@@GOLFADDICT65 I have recently sold them, but generally speaking I don’t see the point in buying acoustic systems for just sounding the TV. It sounds great with quite a deep bass if watching action movies etc
судя по звуку, который дают наушники из этого видео, однозначно выбор в пользу s2000mkiii
Ясно перец
How much louder is the S3000 Pro vs S2000 mkiii? In a moderate sized living room ~40m2.
Update: I returned the S2000MKIIIs and got the S3000Pro. The bass sounds deeper and the highs were a lot cleaner, especially if you crank the volume up in a living room. This was the main reason I switched. At louder volumes the S3000 sounds definitely sounds more "broad" (if that makes sense lol) where the S2000MKIII would have started to struggle at when the volume was pushed past 30ish (total of 40 units of sound).
If I had to fault anything is that the S3000Pros uses slightly older technology/design. Compared to the S2000MKIIIs, I noted: 1) the display panel of the S3000s was a lot smaller (your selected mode is not visible when youre sitting back); 2) the display panel on the S3000Pro doesn't conveniently show the volume you are currently at - each time had to be careful to "dial down" before switching inputs e.g. from phone to vinyl player etc... 3) the S3000 doesnt remember the sound mode you are in i.e. you have to keep selecting "Dynamic"/your preferred mode - that said, I and also others have commented that we cannot distinguish between the sound modes lol
If you are looking to the power output of both, S3000 Pro seems to be more louder.
I have S2000MKIII in 50m2 room, more than enough for me and already too much for my neighbors :) For normal listening and being social I never get beyond 30% of the total power.
Q acoustics 3030i or s3000pro for music and movies??
Q 3030i is not an active and DSP controlled system. So lacking these options I would go for S3000 or S2000MKIII anyways. S3000 should be stronger in the bass department.
@@rdolle990 went for s3000pro, very happy
s3000Pro vs Devialet Phantom pls.
Would you recommend edifier headphones?
I never tested any Edifier headphones
I have some, they're fine, but for those prices there are better obtions
They are actually the reason why am here lol !!! i have them and thy are so nice so i think i can get the monitors too hoping for thr best results
Anyone can advise me a wireless system like s3000pro, but smaller!
Kef lsx
I purchased the S2000MKlll a month ago and its a huge upgrade for me. These speakers take about 20 hours of solid playing to break in when buying new.
what does it mean to break in ?
@@cryptonit.mill.3462t means after 20hrs of playtime it will sound much much better than out of the box.
@@cryptonit.mill.3462 the moving parts on the speakers
s3000pro is deeper bass and wider treble than s2000mk3. but if i get which of s3000pro and s2000mk3 , im gonna get s2000mk3 ‘cause of cheaper price than s3000pro. s2000mk3 is very far better than s3000pro for money. i also got s2000mk3 lol
The mids are less congested on the 3000s but the highs are more laid back and nicer on the 2000s. I wouldnt get either but if I was forced it would be the 2000s.
what would get then? airpulse a300?)
Guys pls help s3000 pro or Adam audio t7v.
s2000 pro edifier vs edifier S2000MKIII ? which is best? can you help thank you
Thank you
S2000MKIII is an upgrade from S2000Pro
He done the comparison. I choose the mkiii.
@@kohnfutner9637 I bought the MKIIII, and I'm extremely happy. Amazing sound!
@@gtMasterdev Yes agree, even at low volumes in the evening they fill your room with so much detail and low-end. I got an extra pair for €300,- and I feel kinda guilty....
I have compared my old hifi system of 80’s (Musical Fidelity A1 + Castle Tyne speakers + Onkyo Integra CD) with Edidier S2000mkiii, thanks to the 3 out of Cd, optical, and 2 rca
1. DAC of Onkyo sound best, more musical. Best rca with DAC Integra, than optical out with edifier internal DAC.
2. Edifier can not compete with Castel speakers drived by MF A1, more space, resonance, perfect for classical music.
3. Runing both systems at the same time from the same CD source is the best, trebles from edifier are fantastic!
The Castle is like an acoustic guitar, very pleasant, Edifier it is more like an electric guitar, plenty of electronics inside the board.
Yes, to replace your current system you might have to look into the Buchard A500 or A700 range :)
@@rdolle990 Castle have more cm3 volume... the sound nice in a 20 m2 room. The Edifier press your hears, and the cabinet is not resonant.
A500 cost 3500 euros.... I prefer perhaps a passive speakers system!
The Edifier S3000Pro of course sounds better than the S2000Mkiii. But it is also twice the price. I was sold on the S3000Pro but now I am thinking I could happily live with the S2000Mkiii and keep half my money for something else. Tough choice. I have not made my mind up yet. I can buy a refurbished pair of S3000Pro's that around around AUD$400 chepaer and that closes the gap for me (AUD$710 vs AUD$450). So hard to decide. Also they're big. By girlfriend was not keen on how much space they would take up. But I want better sound than I am getting with my Bose Revolve + (I have two but it is such a pain putting them in stereo mode). I hope these are siginficantly than my Bose speakers.
I should add that I live in a small two bedroom apartment, the living room is not that big.
What is your update ? After a year what you got ? Better then bose ?
@@jeguljeg1706 There is no comparison. The Edifier S3000Pro speakers are much better than a pair of Bose Revolve Plus speakers. The Bose speakers however are portable, so I still use them. But for the money the Edifier S3000Pro are great. They go on sale fairly often too.
Please s2000pro vs s2000mkIII
+1
Most likely you won't hear much difference, since they use the same driver the same amp design & chip, probably the only difference is MKIII has better Bluetooth make it sound better in theory via connecting to phone.
@@photovideooz4084 But different cabinet, slightly more power and probably different DSP tuning.
A channel from Russia made this comparison. Result: S2000mkiii is a winner according to my ears. Better highs and mids. Same bass response. I would say easily on par with 3000pro, minus the extra bass. Altough some people find the highs bright, and mids a bit more in the background of 2000mkiii and 3000pro, I personally prefer it this way. Because, tuning down is always better versus tuning up. Plus they do not have the same specs. S2000mkiii is triamped, it has the new tuning adjustment like 3000pro. And you have extra 6watts rms treble.
@@pulsarstar You don't need to post this over and over.
6.5" over 5.5" woofer and a better tweeter allows the S3000 to win. The S2000 is almost half the price, and a very good choice as well.
S1000 at quarter the price is still a good buy.
I'm not sold the s3000 would even be worth $100 more. Though I might put $100 more for them but no way pay double.
The same tweeter
just bought the edifier s2000mk3 and super excited to set it up. I bought them to pair with my Uturn orbit plus turntable. anyone suggest a good brand of cables to run from my turntable to the speaker?
Audioquest Tower is good, i am using this to connect AT LP5x with S2000 mk3
I tried earphone, R1855DB, and a Denon 2 channels system listening to this comparison, can't really tell which one better. I assume s2000mkiii will suit better for most listener unless one's place is very large. S3000Pro tweeters is 8+8W with total of 256W, s2000 mkiii tweeters is 15+15W plus woofers 50+50W. Look at these spec I am afraid the extra power s3000pro doesn't offer real advantage in not very large room.
Мне больше нравится как играет s2000mk3🔊🎶
Any one know what the difference between s2000 mkiii and pro version?
the balanced canon inputs..i think,,check it.
MKIII is an upgrade from PRO
A channel from Russia made this comparison. Result: S2000mkiii is a winner according to my ears. Better highs and mids. Same bass response. I would say easily on par with 3000pro, minus the extra bass. Altough some people find the highs bright, and mids a bit more in the background of 2000mkiii and 3000pro, I personally prefer it this way. Because, tuning down is always better versus tuning up. Plus they do not have the same specs. S2000mkiii is triamped, it has the new tuning adjustment like 3000pro. And you have extra 6watts rms treble.
s2000 mk3 for Home TV setup? or better of with Edifier S250DB?
S2000MKIII. Higher quality sound with more detail and control. The sub (T5) of the S350DB will not dive as deep and detailed as well placed MKIII's
Hello. Please tell me the legs of the s3000 speakers are screwed or glued. Are they removable at all ? Thanks
They are screwed.
Could you share your thoughts about the new R2750DB?
Much improved over older R2730DB, more balanced and natural. Very good value for money, one of the best at this price point IMO
@@DSAUDIOreview thank you so much for replying.
My 2750s arriving tomorrow!!
Cool. Share your impressions with us when you test them!
@Jay W i have tested the s350db earlier and now that i have the 2750 i can undoubtedly suggest to go for the latter.
Biggest diff is in the mids as 350db is just not enjoyable enough due to absence of vocals. Plus 2750 gives stunning separation in frequencies due to the 3 way design. Plus the sub out on 2750 cant be ignored