Edifier R2750DB vs Edifier S2000MKIII || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
- Edifier S2000MKIII on amazon DE: amzn.to/359sjDs
Edifier R2750DB on amazon DE: amzn.to/3diZI1j
Edifier R2750DB on amazon UK: amzn.to/3c7C4V9
------------------------------
Follow me on:
Instagram - / digitalstereophony
Facebook - / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
Contact me at:
digitalstereophony@gmail.com
----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using pair of SE Electronics SE8 mics and Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral - Наука та технологія
> 10:15 < Detailed Frequency Response Graphs
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony/
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony/
Hi Guys,
Let me tell my thoughts regarding the Edifier S2000MKIII speakers which I've bought for a couple of weeks ago (and also some thoughts regarding this comparison). I hope this will clarify some concerns and help you guys to know what to expect from these speakers.
First of all, I'm not an audiophile, just a guy who loves listening some quality music with a glass of whiskey in my hands after a tough workday :).
Both R2750DB and S2000MKIII are tuned differently. I think R270DB is factury tuned to be more dynamic (colored) and have more open sound compared to S2000MKIII in Monitor mode (which is set on this video). For me, Monitor mode narrows the sound range (especially highs) and for me it doesn't sound well (maybe I have to run these speakers even more to get better result).
But, here's the thing:
If you turn your S2000MKIII to Dynamic mode the sound stage becomes more opened, you'll get both accurate bass and also beautiful highs which does not go to the detriment of the mid-range as well. I totally understand that in Dynamic mode the speaker "colours" the recorded music a bit, but honestly, who cares if the built-in algorythm does a wonderful job? I think for an average listener it's more important to enjoy what you're listeing rather than reproducing the original sound by 99.99%. In adddition, you get beautiful result not just with losless music, but e.g. with compressed sound sources (Spotify, YT) as well which I think is very useful for an average user (including myself).
@DSAUDIO.review I think when you compare speakers which are designed and tuned for 2 different purpose I think it would be more representative if you could adjust the speakers accordingly (or at least add some tests with diffferent EQ modes). For example, in this case we would get a totally different results if S2000MKIII would be in Dynamic mode as explained above.
Btw, I really like your channel and you're doing a great job, keep up the good work!
I just loved how you listen to viewers' suggestion like this. You already use a separate mics for the speakers. I was so happy seeing this setup in your next videos. Good job! 😊 ♥ from Ph! Stay safe everyone! 🥰
Great comparison, was tossing up between the two, the review made my mind up. Just purchased the 2750s for a bit over half the cost of the 2000s.
2000's seemed to have a wider soundstage and less nasal than the 2750's, to my ears. The 2000's were maybe warmer, as well. However, both sounded very good, just different.
I recently bought S2000 without listening beforehand - and very satisfied with it. Good solid build. The bass is great, although it cannot be switched off completely by the level regulator. I was afraid it would hum too much - but it sounds great! It is just right, no distortion of any kind. Enjoyed new Avatar, and now we’re rewatching LOTR with a cinema sound 😊
At some point the speakers were far from the wall, and the bass was quite lower at low volume. So I recommend to stand them about 10-20cm from the wall for better bass. Of course in your case it could sound differently.
Big thanks for your videos! It helped me choose
I just love your comparisons, BIG FAN!
What do you think personally of the two in terms of SQ?
Please elaborate for pure music listening.
Very nice Battle.
They are close, with slight advantages for the S2000 in terms of refinement and clarity and a more stable line in the mids and highs, but are a little weaker in the bass department and sound a little less voluminous.
Also the 2750 are quite big and look somewhat cheaply built, while the S2000 plays in a whole other league there, but also cost about twice as much.
Enjoyable are both, i'd say go with what you can afford and fits your needs.
Knowing the S2000MKIII, these are pretty far from being weak in the bass department. In some cases perhaps a little too much (to my taste). I think the R2750 are rather bass heavy and playing less controlled.
@rockn roll No it's not at all. It has tight deep low end and mid/treble is sweet and round. No harshness or shrill sound at all. Not too sure a planar tweeter can be considered being "metal". It's considered to be the better choice even...
cant blame. the S2000 are without subwoofer.. for sure the bass will be bad.. is not a Tri-Amp anyway. clarity wise s2000 are clear.
@@XFXblender No, for sure not 'bad', just not as deep and punchy as a T5 or bigger sub added to them, they also can be adjustet up to +/-6db in both Bass and treble.
Also Sound doesnt consist only of bass... and not to mention that they, to keep it fair, are probably testet in neutral mode, while the most punchy on them is usually the dynamic mode.
Hope we can see the new R2850DB vs R2750DB vs HS8 at some point in the near future
I am confused between
The new R2850DB or s1000mkii
They are in the exact same price line
Can you please suggest me which one to buy?
@@thePuranas Does anyone have an opinion on this? Probably the bass will be better on 2850 than 2750 but what about the mids and highs?
@@alexandros-markovits you can check it here, ua-cam.com/video/aBZPWY7zdes/v-deo.html, to my ears, the mids have more presence on the 2750.
@@philippeclausen9180 the 2750db has better sound quality. 45 Hz ~ 20 kHz and the 2850db 42 Hz ~ 20 kHz being 8 inches the sub rumbles and covers the mids
As duas são excelentes!!!
Both are very similar to each other, but mids sound more present on the R2750DB.
Which stands are you using for the edifier R2750DB ?
I choose the source track! I wonder if Edifier R2750DB would put many speaker enthusiasts into denial or defense because of their incredible value and the fact that a not so sought after or well known brand being able to possibly defeat a very reputable speaker at maybe 5~10 times their price (or possibly even more)? But soon there'd probably be comments saying these can't even beat speakers in their own price range or lower.
Good points
Would love to hear those Tannoy Gold 8s with this new setup with the mics pointed directly at the tweeters. Ill be ordering them and returning my FX80s but the Tannoys are sold out everywhere.
What didn't you like about the FX80's?
You should try the new S1000MKII, too :)
Wich one of the 2 are better for musci and watching series and such i have to pick between the r2750db or 1000smkii or the 2000smkiii pls help
Just bought R 2750db for A$299 and I love it.
Musical separation is much better on the 2750's to me. Amazing stuff
Were the Bass & Treble knobs in the center position on both speakers ?
And which sound mode, eg dynamic, monitor,classic etc ?
Hey DS, please include in the description what you think about the speakers. Tell us your subjective opinion about it so that we can decide what speaker to purchase and whats not.
I think there is no perfect speaker and they should be compared with each other and also with our own criteria; we must first define our own need and sort through the available options; the choice can only be a personal choice after listening; sometimes our host give his opinion between 2 or 3 models depending on the intended use.
he's right, DS is next to them and at how many speakers he has tested, I think he knows which one sounds better
@@harmonie30 no need to be objective when comparing these speakers. We just wanted to know whether he like the speakers or not. I think someone who have a wall of these speakers is already qualified to give reviews.
I wonder if anyone has done a great test like yours with the Edifier R2800. 140W, 8 inch woofers, 4 inch mids, 0.75 inch tweeters. They sound excellent to my ears for near field listening after EQing to compensate for my small bedroom, I've heard them play unEQed in much larger rooms and they sound quite neutral, with just a slight hint of warmth on the default settings. Wonder how they'll sound and measure under your test conditions, though I bet the sub bass will be measurably better than the R2750db.
4G12 2850db is on the way
@@eddiechen3824 2850db would be interesting. Do you know when they might be available in europe? Im about to buy r2750db, but I really would like it to support aptx codec, so thats little problem for me.
@@arihietala9618 and its out. Bt5.1, aptx, 150w. Sounds like a winner to me.
the r 2750 db sounds clearly, smoother, more crisp and much more of punching and kicking hard bass. It is a true 3 way speaker
bought 2750DB, good price, loved them, bought for bass n boom, n they deliver plenty
Is it really that bassy like a JBL Partybox? Wouldnt mind getting one if they are... lol!
@@-MarkWinston- for the price you pay, they are awesome. Lots of power and very loud. Lots of bass u won't need a sub.
@@daaz102 i already have a sub and Im looking to get the new s2850db which has a sub out. My sub is laying there doin nothing so might as well plug it in and cross it over low.
@@-MarkWinston- 2850 looks even better :) sound good mate. Sure if you have a sub do use it. Better to use if you have already have it.
@@daaz102 have you tested how low would the s2750db go with a frequency generator or some sort?
How do they compare to the old S2000 model (which had external amp included)? There is not much reviews about it but now it has very good price around $200. So I'm wondering if anybody compared it to the modern models?
I wanted R2750DB before I watched this video. Now I'm waiting for delivery of ordered S2000MKIII. Thank you, Digital Stereophony :)
@Jessus Christ No, I didn't.
I'm complitely satisfied with the sound of s2000mkiii. They sound much clearer and natural compared to the 2750DB.
Sound aside, for me s2000mkii has several advantages over s2000pro:
1. Vertical front panel instead of angeled in s2000pro.
2. Bluetooth 5.0 with Aptx HD support.
3. Additional line input instead of XLR which I don't need.
4. More convenient remote control.
5. The color of the side panels is not as bright and more beautiful imo.
6. Side panels are made of MDF. There are a lot of negative feedbacks about the wooden side panels of the first version of s2000pro, which cracked often.
For the same price the choice was quite obvious for me.
Hi, s2000mkiii better bass than r2750 db?Do You like them for watching movies? DO You feel the need of a subwoofer?
@@madalin4441 Hi!
Obviously R2750DB have more bass than S2000MKIII as they have a 6.5" woofer versus 5.5". But S2000MKIII bass is more precise and clear and I like it more. I took S2000MKIII mainly for music listening, but they are also very good for movies. Their bass is enough for me.
Of course, if you want powerful sounds when watching movies, like at a cinema, you can't do without a subwoofer (it doesn't matter if you have S2000MKIII or R2750DB).
If I lived in a private house with no neighbors and was a fan of watching movies, I would go for the 5.1 system.
@@fenol314159 But with the s2000mkiii you don't have hdmi connection to the tv.. So you need 2 remotes. And what is the consequence for sound delivery via optical versus hdmi.. I think I stil need to go for a soundbar like the sasmung q8ooa.. Althought I woudl prefer to have speakers higher up next to (wider stereo) to the tv.. !!?? Any axperience between soundbars and 2 speakers with tv watching ??
@@eurovisie2010 Indeed, my LG TV can't change the volume via the optical cable (except for LG soundbar), although my android TV box can. So if you don't want to use two remotes, you better choose something with hdmi. For me this is not a big problem.
Regarding sound delivery via optical versus hdmi: In theory, it should be the same, since both of these channels are digital. But the advantage of an optical one is that it is unlikely to be affected by external electromagnetic interference and it provides galvanic isolation between the TV and the speakers.
I have no experience between soundbars and 2.0 speakers when watching TV. But my guess is that the benefits of a soundbar might lie in more precise positioning of sounds in games and movies. But since soundbars have relatively small speakers, the sound quality (bass and midbass) will be lower compared to 2.0 speakers when listening to music.
Is it worth to buy Edifier S2000MKIII if im going to plug them through a standard jack into my PC mainboard (a reeally good one with a really good sound chip onboard) or only if i would buy an external audio card like focusrite scarlet?
Speakers can do 192/24 of optical input if motherboard have realtec 1220 all is fine, due to optical output
Seriously need to test the all new s2850db...
Yes please...
Hi, maybe you might consider reviewing Thonet & Vander active speaker
I have a pair. They are premium quality speakers. The packaging and presentation is excellent. The sound is also top notch.
Hello Digital Stereophony, what would you say is the best Edifier speaker for metal/EDM enjoyment ?
I was considering S3000 Pro, what do you think ?
S3000Pro is the best Edifier speaker for that IMO. I am using them as I type this, listening to Moderat Live Show and it grooves hard ;)
@@DSAUDIOreview thank you very much, i'll go for it!
I always listen the whole sound test before I read the commends. To my ears, 2750 sound much better..clear, broader, more like more open than 2000. Then, when I read all the commends, everyone is praising the 2000 clear sound. Maybe I have ears problem or maybe I have bad taste for music. Maybe my gadget limitation. Or is it maybe it's very hard to differentiate the sound in youtube? think I like 2750 more and will make a purchase soon because it's way cheaper than s2000 and also it sounds better to my ears here. For those who owned both, do you have any advice?
Listening with : tin t2 iem, akg k240 mk2.
Want to say thank you in advance. And million thanks to his channel.
To my ears,
(s2k) : clear, yes..but feel still not very bright (don't know how to describe) it sounds like most of the instruments standing at the back stage, only a few playing in front.
(2750) : everyone is in the front line and playing. Sound more like brighter, open, no missing instruments in the music.
So, to those who owned both now/past, do they really sound like that? Do they sound way different in real life than in youtube? Which one do you advice according to my liking stated above? I still haven't bought any of those. Thanks again.
2750 is cheaper, but 2000 look so good. Especially the wooden finish on the sides..damn it looks so sleek! (though the front looks like it's wearing a T-Pad or something.... )
@@vnckkw Man, I had the same impression of you about the R2750DB; and the same surprising when I saw the comments, people praising the S2000iii like was the best.. But no, the 2750 sounds more open to my ears, with more sound stage and clarity; and for sure, with better bass extension! I think the S2000iii wins in the highs, cause it has really cleaner sound in this frequencies, but it's nothing about such difference between the R2750DB.
I'm now planing to take the R2850DB.
Can you test KEF LSX? If you can have them of course.
The source has lot of sub bass, like a full range output and both of these speakers just eat those low freq and sound very bland...are these any good?
Could you possibly do the Edifier r980t vs the bose companion 2?
Edifier r2000db 165€ vs r2750 185€ which would you pick for desktop use? (I have the space for r2750 on my table)
Neither, S2000 mkiii.
It would be a good test to see the Edifier 2750DB vs Edifier 350DB as they're both priced the same.
There is a comparison between S350DB and R2750DB. S350DB and 360DB almost sound the same, there is a price difference though but it's fairly new, that's why it's more expensive. Spoiler: R2750DB sounds better 😁
which one model sounds better?
Oh man the source track sounds soo good lol
Edifier S2000MKIII - win. May be HEDD Type vs ... ?
Edifier S2000MKIII way better, but mid freq better on R2750DB
yeah with them being 3 way
Of course, the s2000 have clearer sound.
The battle is 2730db VS 2750db. Waiting for this , to see how they compare...
@rockn roll yea, the s2000 are a little off. With a touch of overdone heights.
The R2750DB sounds more open, less compressed/congested than the S2000MKIII. There sounds like more reverb with the R2750DB though, is that the room? Also, I have the S2000MKIII and don't like the flat mode, much prefer the dynamic mode (which treble tipped down a bit), which I think makes it sound more like the R2750DB in this video. Thanks, a great comparison!
That's the comment I needed. Love this channel but it should be said in the description the mode of the speakers. I ordered the s2000mkIII (waiting for them), but after some videos here I liked the R2750/R2850. However, it appears s2000s here are always recorded in monitor mode, so Ill keep my order of the s2000s and hope Dynamic mode adds that "fun factor" Im seeing here in the r2750s. PS: Im not a big bass-fan guy, and its for a small room, so I hope I made the right choice.
@@MrLaidback можешь не ждать от 2750 средние частот их там нет!
Вс ужасные цикающие хуйни...
Я тож насмотрелся этих обзоров и купил 2750.. - худшая покупка...
Не средних, не высоких, не нижних)
Просто балалайка
2850 которые у меня сейчас - другое дело, но это гуделки на низах , увы....
@@back_to_life0 ok, from the translation you say r2750 has almost no mids… I understand. Hope i will likr s2000 :) can’t wait
@@MrLaidback у меня были 2800,2750, t5
Сейчас 2850 и magnat 8 дюймовик саб который оказался в разы лучше за обоснованный т5
What can you say in the end about the s2000& did you buy them, are you happy with the sound?
I bought r2750db but getting some problem with bluetooth connectivity.... not sure what is the problem. Any idea??? When it is connected, it works for 5 or 10 mins, then disconnect automatically. Its so annoying.
Its a technical issue came in one set from thousands of them, Replace them asap under warranty.
The R2750 are 3-way speakers and, to my ears at least, sound better.
lol NO!
@@LokiOdinson Its opinion, people like different sounds...
@@avidviewer9381 Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Are they really 3-way. The R2730 had a DAC that could only put out 2 channels per side. High and mid shared a channel and were seperated by a high and low pass filter. The 2750 looks like a relaunch of the 2730.
Btw I love my 2730s. Best speakers I ever had.
@@andreasvogler1875 tri-amp meaning they are true 3 ways
please do microlab b70
To my ears via Topping L30 + JVC FW01:
Hands down the S2000 retains all the good qualities of R2750 but with a sizable notch up in the vocals department, smooth addictive elixir.
Easy, get the S2000.
Costs twice as much though ^^'
The good part are the mids in 2750. So it sounds more studio. I guess if we add little heavy sub woofer it will make huge difference
Just to add, I have bought 2750 and they sound awesome. I will add an active subwoofer. Any suggestions? I am thinking to het SVS SB 1000
Thank you! For me Best sound from - Source track with my SLR305 =)
Сделай обзор R2800 vs 2700
I think Single mic setup was better..this setup sounds bass heavy and detail in mids and highs missing.. sounds soft..
It just really depends where he points it at. For the 2 ways it looks closer pointed to the tweeters which actually may be correct depending on what the manual calls for ear level. The 3 ways are pointed closer to the mids. Basically it depends where the ear is supposed to be so thats where he should point it.
They look so ugly but sound so good. Ive found this happens all the time with speakers. Many times the good looking ones excel at being good looking and the ugly ones with the big boxy cabinets are the real speakers. The 3 ways easily win here.
S2000 is more balanced, but there is the price point at RT2750 (little bit boxy and). Usually we have to pay the several percent twice, but if you don't need it choose the cheaper.
Are the R2730db the same as de 50s? Cause those are the ones available in my country and they’re waaay cheaper than the S2000
R2750DB is improved version of R2730DB. If you choose between them than go for newer R2750DB cause it is much better
@@DSAUDIOreview ahh that sucks, the 2750 are not available here, but the 2730 and the s2000 are and the s2000 are at like 3 times the price, so yeah I think I'd have to pic the 2730 between those anyway...
I'd wish they had the R2800 though, those seemed the best for a tv set up from the edifier lineup besides the ones with sub.
these videos must be watched with headphones to understand the difference ...
add a sub to the s2000 and its a perfect combination. s2000 mk 3 has the detail and seperation just needs some depth. btw s2000 mk3 has DSP DTS and a class D amp!
When switching S2000MK3 to Dynamic mode it starts to dig way deeper. There is also extra bass and treble controls. Perhaps a sound test between the presets is possible at this channel?
Ambos van por ahi ambos son buenos me es dificil decidir cual de ellos me recomiendan???
El s2000 tiene la última tecnología para mejor audio si buscas calidad ambos son buenos pero es s2000 lo supera levemente en tanto calidad de materiales como resultado de sonido
@@maia_10962 y cuanto es la diferencia. De precios .
Cual de los parñantes woofer me recomiendas de todoa
@@kimsooyoungntz4881 dependiendo del uso que le des y de qué país seas varía . Pero en Argentina el s2000 cuesta 10 mil pesos más minimo
Dear DS.
I hope to compare active speaker EDIFIER S3000PRO and KLIPSCH R-51PM. If not here, never be able to see the complete comparison active speaker EDIFIER S3000PRO and KLIPSCH R-51PM video.
please...please
It was done some time ago. Browse the channel and you will find it
@@DSAUDIOreview Could you test out the new Fluid FX50 and the FX80?
@@DSAUDIOreview That is Edifier S3000Pro vs Yamaha HS8 OTL.....
I love this channel ... crazyly......
@@DSAUDIOreview If you can't find it, please link me.
@@James-Coffeemann ua-cam.com/video/AhU9hR9IGDw/v-deo.html
I find the mids a bit wearing on the s2000's
There is an upgrade on s2000mkiii, or it is the same thing of s2000pro?
These are the upgrade to the s2000pro
@@hialastair Yes, i know., but mkiii performence is much better than pro or the difference is not very noticeable?
S2000 MKiii is tuned by Phil Jones 🤫
@@hinrei1986 s2000pro is not tuned by Phil Jones?
Where is Edifier R2800 ?
I don't like the source track, otherwise both edifier are excellent.
isn't 2750 more crisp clear guyz??
Does not sound like that to me. I think in order to hear the clear difference except the bass you need good headphones.
Definitely... its more crisp in the mids, sounding more open in that region with a greater sense of spaciousness only a 3 way can produce.
@@-MarkWinston- Oh, I thought crisp clear is about the highs.
Hey my man.ı think to do false this test. Because s2000 mkiii are not playing on dynamic mode.you are playing it only monitor mode.This mode flat and it is very tasteless and this mode only for music production.
@Digital Stereophony the Edifier R2750DB say in the box that is about 85 DB... how is the real sensitivity of them?
Can you tell?
Tnx,
Love your channel.
There is no such thing for an active speaker.
@@henriktoth56 bollocks. Every speaker (averaged out) and driver has a sensitivity rating.
@@-MarkWinston- Bollocks. That only has meaning for PASSIVE speakers, not an active model like this.
@@henriktoth56 nonsense. Every driver has a sensitivity rating rated at 1w/1 meter. Regardless wether passive or active, every driver has a rating.
@@-MarkWinston- Nonsense. You cannot interpret sensitivity when the amp is built inside the speaker, because you simply cannot power those with the specified 1W.
does the s2000 have sub out?
Nope
@@DSAUDIOreview Do you recommed getting R2750DB over the S2000 mkIII? It has a sub out right? i can get it for 300 usd here in india...
The s2000 sounds like they have a hiss. But it's a tad clearer than r2750db. Otherwise I really can't pinpoint the differences.
The smallest differences in these video's will be rather huge if you are standing in front of them in real life. The 2750 would even sound muffled in comparison.
@@rdolle990 they dont sound muffled, they have a warm-tone and non-overdone heights.
@@rdolle990 you must be on some good shit to think that the 2750 will sound muffled next to the s2000mkIII.
Не пойму, звук одинаковый?
Видимо слушаешь с устройства, не способного передать нюансы. 2750 бучкает выразительнее.
@@user-of2hc5ne2e дешёвые наушники.
@@alexpris3705 звук идентичный натуральному 😄
Sama saja..
S350DB VS S2000 PLEASE~~
The 2750db has better sound quality, plus a subwoofer can be added that transforms it into a 2.1 high-end
R2750db discontinues
R2750DB is a new model. R2730DB is discontinued
Edifier R2750DB - 9.7 vs Edifier S2000MKIII - 9.5
Отзовитесь владельцы с2000мк3 если они вообще есть)
Привет, были у меня такие колонки, месяц назад приобретал где-то, неделю слушал и потом сдал их обратно, перед ними брал R2850db так же слушал неделю и сдал обратно, сегодня жду поставки Airpulse a80. Очень хотелось услышать в живую ленточный твитер. Если + - все утроит и цена будет оправдывать средства то оставлю их, если нет то тоже сдам и куплю скорее всего обратно s2000mk3.
@@galactusonlygreenmetal152 а что не устраивало в каждой из модели? И откуда такие придирки и вкус?
@@back_to_life0 Просто захотелось купить в коем веке нормальные колонки для компьютера, универсальные, что бы и музыку послушать и фильмы посмотреть, несколько месяцев смотрел разные обзоры. Сам до этого имел только Микролаб B72 и + - нормальные наушники. Захотелось чего-то большего. Как я понял по цене + качество + потенциал из бюджетных производителей Edifier наголову опережает других производителей колонок для компа потипу того же микролаба, свен и прочие. Решил если гулять то гулять и сразу присмотрелся к серии R2700 потом 2750, потом к 2800. и пока я думал что из этого купить вышла 2850. Не думая взял их. Погонял немного и понял что не моё. У меня довольно большой стол для компа152 см. в ширину, поставить было куда, плюс наслушался и начитался ютуб обывателей для которых главное что бы что-то там бубнило .... сидеть перед ними не вариант от слова совсем, это не для компьютера штуки, + на них музыка не понравилась как звучит, бубнящий. И на невысокой громкости они так себе играют. Слушать весь день их нельзя, начинает болеть голова, это еще и от помещения зависит но переделывать всю комнату из за колонок для компа такое себе занятие. Кино смотреть на них было прикольно. Звук объёмный и грохочет хорошо, но я смотрю кино раз в неделю мб а музыку я слушаю в 90% когда сижу у компа и играю. Поэтому решил сдать их. Купил s2000mk3. И тот момент когда я их включил ..... я осознал в действительности что ютуб вообще не может передавать то, как они играют, их нужно слушать только в живую. По сравнению с 2850 это было ... как бы сказать, это как зубило и скальпель, они очень острые и агрессивные, слушать очень приятно и попрошествию выходных у меня ни разу не заболела голова или возникло утомление или еще что-то, Для кино конешно они не так грохочат как 2820, всё таки 8 дюймов против 5,5. Но именно само качество звука, особенно для музыки. "Я не слушаю рэп, или что то бубнящее танцевальное, мне нравится рок и метал. В них устроило всё, просто прикола ради решил услышать ленточный твитер в живую и заказал а80 airpulse, уже приехали кстати =) они такие маленькие по сравнению с теми колонками =) Вот погоняю их неделю. Если не устроят то сдам и возьму назад s2000mk3.
@@galactusonlygreenmetal152 у а 80 слишком маленький мидбас, уж если иногда смотреть фильмы то тогда хотя бы 2000мк3____
Я тоже слушаю исключительно рок, в частности любимую, арию, рамштайн, линкин, и разный металл, где играет бас гитара, электро , тарелки, барабаны...
____
Имею сам 2750 - музыку на них не послушаешь, они гудящие, верха не приятные, у меня есть наушники, когда их одеваю, слышу нормально средние частоты и верха , ебаный бубнящий бас не забивает звуки, у меня на колонках стоит бас -3, -4, он заебывает и в любом случае на 2850 ыильмы хоть смотреть можно, 2750 не музыку не фильмы играть не могут, очччееееень слабые басовики, они больше гудят, чем выдают низкие частоты. Мне на 2750 не нравятся и вч, они какие то мертвые , ублюдошные
Скажи как именно отличаются вч у 2000 и 2850?
У моих 2750 вч динамик такой самый как у 2850.
____
Я тоже хотел взять 2000 мк3 побоялся что баса будет слишком мало и что вч таже противные, а тут читаю твои сообщения и удивляюсь) ведь я тоже слушаю рок,металл и смотрю фильмы раз в неделю)
Кто то мне писал, что в фильмах нужны не только низкие частоты, но и средние так как там много звуков.
Хотел продать свои 2750 и купить 2850 но теперь еще больше сомневаюсь, у меня то телека даже нет, и слушать с 5метров нет возможности.
Через что ты их подключаешь, у меня вообще через реалтек 887 по аналогу с foobar wasapi ,flac
@@back_to_life0 У меня тоже нет телевизора, у жены на кухне есть 24 дюйма, самый раз, хватает с головой, там нечего смотреть, кроме развлекательных и музыкальных каналов по приставке. Суть в том, что вся музыка пишеться на студийный пультах в стерео насколкьо я знаю это так в 99% случаев, Т.е бонусы от трех-полоски не так приятны для прослушивания музыки, т.к она изначально записана на 1 пищалку и 1 мид-бас. У трёхполоски есть объём, но нет собранности из за этого, поэтому они бубнят местами где такого эффекта нет при классическом варианте в 2 динамика. Я много смотрел разборов на канале Depo196 там очень толково дядька рассказывает что да как, но никогда не даёт никаких рекомендаций, что очень плохо ... =))
Я вообще никак не заморачивался с подключениями, как Депо196 и сказал, это самодостаточные колонки в которых всё есть, нет смысла городить огород, просто подключите к источнику питания и слушайте.
У меня простым кабелем подключено к материнке и всё.
По поводу 2850, если честно я ожидал некого эффекта "Вауууу" когда включу их после своих микролабов, я ожидал что мир заиграет разными красками и я услышу что-то невероятное, но такого эффекта не случилось, а скорее всего наоборот .... мощность не брал в расчет, а детальность и в целом картину. А когда включил Metallica Murder One на s2000mk3 этот эффект появился, после 2850 они так агрессивно заиграли, так четко и детально, б*ять это как питбуль зарычали, планарный твитер в них и купольник в 2850 это разница в день и ночь по моим ощущениям, не знаю, если бы послушать к примеру свен мс30, для сравнения в живую. т.к они весьма бюджетны и неплохо сделаны для их денег, они двухполосные. нужно сравнивать на равных концептах, а так 2 и 3 полосы сильно разный звук. У с2000 нет выхода на саб, саб можно подключить к примеру Т5 от эдифаер, там есть входы для простого разветвления, но минус системы что бы регулировать громкость отдельно на колонках и на саб либо на источнике звука, на компе просто в микшере громкость юзать тогда, что для меня не очень удобно, поэтому взял а80 думал мб к ним саб докупить тот же Т5 от эдиков, он не дорогой и его для компа хватит за глаза. Под кино и прочее. Сделать некий трифоник так сказать. Просто первые впечатления от а80 про сухом прослушивании, да чувствуеться что не тот калибр, мидбаса, вот думаю докупать саб или обменять обратно на мк3 и не городить огород. Так то 1 отдельный саб на 8 дюймов в любом случае будет сильнее чем два 8 дюймовых в колонках. Но как это скажется в целом на картину звука хз ... Нужно, что бы колонки играли так, что бы ты мог их слушать очень долго и не уставать от них, что бы они очень качественно и детально играли как громко так и тихо, а тихо мало что играет хорошо, тем более трехполоски, им надо наваливать мощи что бы их восьми-дюймовый лопухи начали работать, а целый день слушать невнятную тарабарщину на большой громкости у меня желания нет. Думал взять еще s3000 но так же читал от пользователей, что устаешь от них, и некоторые меняли 3000 на 2000мк3 и норм. Они местами более натурально играют хз ...
I think for two of them represented something like un-natural treble, cmiiw
s2000 much more clarity and detail.
2750 206 euros.... 🤣
КАКАЯ ПОБЕДА, динамик 5.5 - какая может быть победа, какая может быть глубина! - кусок говна
OMG Guys did you really watch full video till end? FR+THD 10:43
WTF you all here talking about? What the hell 2000 has less mids?? Why 2750 has sharp high???
Did you all blind or something?? S2000 WAY WAY MUCH MORE better at whole frequency response + THD! Stop that trash! Bcoz you listening OWN speakers not. If you speaker bad or usual (not reference monitors) you will never hear true sound!
R2750 have very poor and cheap sound. Bass is moody and treble are trash! no clarity and feels like sound from bathroom! New 2000mkII is better speaker.
But im really wanna see S3000pro vs 2000MKII. Its really interesting for me like for owner of s3000pro.
Agree, even at the first track it's already very clear. I wonder on what type of speakers or cans some people listen :)
@@rdolle990 its mystery for me
ua-cam.com/video/gLgxd51vlPM/v-deo.html
@@user-es8qd6fu1o знаю, видел. но это полная херня, как подбор трэков так и само качество сравнения. По этому жду именно от этого канала.
Шипилявят вч у 2750 - совсем говенные там вч...
Both bullshit 😂 I start to hate my r2700 for this plastic increased mid bass and dirty high's...