00:00 Scott Peterson Case Background 02:55 DNA Testing 13:22 Defense: DNA Evidence Issues 25:31 State Arguments: Who's Paying for the DNA Tests? 32:19 Defense: Lack of Evidence against Scott Peterson 35:46 Expert Analysis #CourtTV Catch up on the #ScottPeterson case here: www.courttv.com/tag/scott-peterson/?
Wish I could have heard the whole hearing. True Crime Matters with Tara Marie breaks down part of the motion. Mostly witnesses. They do have a declaration from the Medina's that the burglary was on the 24th. Steve Todd made the mistake of using the Medina's landline phone to call Glenn Pearce. That information was given to the police department but they kicked to the curb. There are also other witnesses declaratios. Enjoy if you watch it. It has 4 parts.@@COURTTV
What are the chances that “The burglars “ deposed of her body right where Scott was fishing. 🙄 I mean …seriously? The same day Lacy and Conner were identified, Scott dyed his hair, borrowed his brother’s photo ID , and headed for the Mexico border with over $10,000 in cash. I could go on. 🫤Too many RED FLAGS 🚩.
That’s what I’m saying! I don’t believe in coincidences especially in true crime. He’s 100 percent guilty and these fools are trying to get him a new trial to gain notoriety for their chapter of the innocence project! It’s disgusting
@@fearfullnature I’m I do t know but I’m pretty sure the police announced to the media where he was at the time of the murder which would allow someone to dispose of the body in that location since it wasn’t found until awhile after.
I am very disappointed in the LA Innocence Project. I was pregnant at they same time as Lacey and between 1. His lies to his mistress during his wife’s candlelight vigil 2. Telling Amber that he had “lost” his wife 3. The boat bought right before his wife was murdered that no one knew about 4. His wife and child’s body washing up right where he gave his alibi at 5. The call to her mother and saying “she’s missing” before even making calls to friends in case she was picked up by a friend 6. The hair in the pliers….i can go on and on. There are so many cases that deserve a deeper look but this isn’t one of them. What a slap in Sharron’s face!
We ALL watched the trial .. Scott is GUILTY! All mother’s knew what he did ! So , much evidence! Innocent people don’t run to the border with different hair color , 10,000 cash and brother’s passport on the day your wife and child are found washed up on a bay that he happened to be fishing on when no one knew he had a boat he hid it in a storage facility ! When Lacey’s step father asked him , you have a boat and Scott said yes I bought it for you !! I could go on and on ….this burns me
Yes, and if I recall correctly he had just gotten a fishing license a day or two before. And then the sudden travel plans? Yeah right.....@@unoimright5153
@@Treesah0416 I was pregnant the same time Lacy was too and where they found the remains is on a trail by the bay I used to frequent all the time. He is 100 percent guilty and nothing will change that. They expect us to believe that he went to the Berkeley Marina on a bad day weather wise because I remember and the very same day Lacy goes missing and months later her and Conners remains not very far from where Scott was?? Yeah right! No one framed him no one was after them. They lived a low risk lifestyle so I don’t believe that theory either. The man is where he needs to be and if he gets a new trial based on a stupid technicality that would be devastating! Let Lacy and Conner Rip! Shame on the LA innocence project! They are barking up the wrong tree cause this monster is guilty on all counts!
Excellent comment...I always thought that a real nail in his coffin was when he told Amber that it would be his first Christmas without his deceased wife...while she was still alive!
You don’t know what they know. Keep an open mind. If that was you in jail wouldn’t you want someone to listen to you if you know you’re innocent ? Don’t let the horror of this case cloud your thinking
The only person who thinks he’s innocent is his deranged sister in law who literally got a law degree to fight his case. I think she’s obsessed with him…
It’s not many. There will always be SOME weirdos that align themselves with the OBVIOUS murd3rer- whoever that is. Because they’re mentally ill , delulu, or in denial. Chris watts, Jodi arias? Scott P? It doesn’t matter- there will always be *those* Ppl. 🤡
He tried to start another life with a woman while his wife was pregnant He told the other woman he didn't want kids while his wife was 8 months pregnant He lied to the other woman while he was at his wife's search party He secretly bought a boat His dead wife & son were found in the waterway where his secret bought boat went into water When he was caught he went in disguise & tried to flee to Mexico He had high paid lawyers Lets actually use the innocence project for those who are actually innocent and don't have access to proper resources & representation
@@mac609 I'm sure they did. Janey also did some interning with an organization related to LA Innocence Project. I'm sure she schmoozed her way in there.
Scott Peterson is definitely reaching if he thinks that somehow he can spin his horrible crime and make it seem like he is innocent. I think it’s fair to say he will be spending the rest of his days in jail as it should be.
They want to DNA test the tape that was found on Laci’s body when recovered from the bay. How could there still be DNA on tape after being in salt water for approx. 4 months?
@winkieblink7625 Did they check to see if Scott had a roll of duct tape either at his home or his shop. To see if it matches the duct tape found on Laci.
Dude went fishing on a cold winter morning. His wife's body found in the same area. He's as guilty as the day is long. Should've gotten the chair years ago.
@@BigAlWillis he went fishing on a cold winter morning, when he had NEVER been fishing before in that bay or in that boat, or ever as a hobby at all. With tackles that was not opened.
Ugh. No! Oh ok so the two cleared suspects just happened to take Laci's body to the exact spot Scott was fishing? Did they follow him hundreds of miles not knowing where he was going just hoping he would go to a large body of water so they could dump her there and pin the murder on him? Ridiculous.
A read they want to DNA test the tape that was found on Laci’s body when recovered from the bay. How could there still be DNA on tape after being in salt water for approx. 4 months?
I followed the entire case from the day Laci was gone. I followed the events and evidence and what I heard from the courtroom. I have Zero doubt of his guilt.
@@valleygirl2530Why is the state not cooperating with the defense? Why won't they allow the defense to test the evidence? If, they know they have the right man, they should turn over everything, so that SP can get a new trial, if he is innocent as he claims.
These people will leave an innocent person with empirical proof of innocence in prison until they get around to it. But when their people are clearly guilty alwhite
It could be DNA from the person who sold the duct tape. The tape could have nothing to do with case and it just attached to Laci in the ocean before she was discovered.
When discussing convicted killer Scott Peterson I think it’s so important to keep repeating that in no way are the La innocence project affiliated with the innocence project. The innocence project themselves have made a statement saying this. The La innocence project have hi jacked the innocence project name in order to try and give themselves credibility. This is an absolute waste of time and resources on a family annihilator with the empathy and feelings of a psychopath. If he does get a new trial I hope it’s televised so the world can watch him be proven guilty again
Hes prob guilty but I understand why theyre taking on this case. Theres A&E documentary showing a lot of evidence and leads the cops didn’t look into that made me rethink this whole thing and at the very least believe he deserves a new trial
I followed the case very closely and in my opinion the evidence against him was completely overwhelming down to even the finest of details. Investigators could have spent years chasing red herrings and it would still have come down to Scott Peterson.
All the prosecutors need to do is legally collect evidence and support their charges against the suspect. They’re not obligated to investigate EVERYTHING everywhere. The JURY has the final say. They said GUILTY of 2 Homicides. DONE.
You should did this as you did not act upset at all having her disappear 8 months pregnant and have no feelings of her dead along with your baby son. No man acts so cold after this happens like you did back then.
@@lillyshaw9439acquitted means found not guilty. Baldwin didn’t get a verdict because the case got tossed. That’s very different. He will forever have it looming over his head.
There are plenty of reasons why he's guilty, but to point to just one, if Laci was abducted by the burglars returning from her walk or leaving for her walk, she would have been found in black pants and a white top. This is what the "witnesses" Janey put forward say they saw her wearing. This is what Scott says she was wearing and this is what was put on the flyers. However she was found in her own khaki/tan pants, from her favourite store, in her size. She has to have returned home and gotten changed and then gone back outside or the burglars kindly bought her a new outfit. So let's say she got home and got changed to go out, why did she leave the leash on the dog not once but twice, something according to Scott she didn't do. In fact the first thing Scott did on returning home was to remove the leash. Why did she got outside with no purse, no keys, no phone. She couldn't have seen the burglars from the window, the curtains were drawn. If she saw them on her walk and was concerned, she could have confronted them then and there. Why would she go inside, get changed and go outside with nothing, just to confront them? And before the Scott defenders tell me that's just who Laci was, it actually wasn't. What she was, was a heavily pregnant woman who had been complaining about her fatigue, who had a bunch of stuff to do that day, who the housekeeper said had to sit after going grocery shopping. So she is not going to rush out the door to confront burglars after walking her dog and mopping the floor.
This man is guilty ! I’m sick of yall with the white privilege card! This man killed his wife I don’t care what nobody says !! This man never shed not 1 tear .. never searched for her ! Told the mistress his wife was dead !!!! They were out searching for her !!! This can’t be real !!! Smh
Lol white privilege card? Cause black ppl haven’t been released from prison after a second look was done (sarcasm) 🤡 this is why ppl don’t take these comments seriously anymore.
People don’t have anything they can provide that wasn’t put out by the media. They all are certain of his guilt yet the trial wasn’t televised and the only info the public received was biased one sided media coverage. People allow their emotions to cloud their judgement and they don’t even realize how much they don’t know
No sign of Laci being alive on December 24th but plenty of evidence of Scott being around all morning and all day (if the defense had one relevant witness they would have testified in court). Scott researching the tides, currents in the Bay and around Brook's Island before he even bought the boat. Buying a secret boat. Buying a 2 day fishing licence specifically for the 23rd and 24th on December 20th for a supposed unplanned, last minute fishing trip. No explanation for where all that extra cement from a 90lb bag went. One of Laci's hairs wrapped around the working end of a pair of pliers in his boat. Someone saw Scott loading something large wrapped in a tarp into his truck that morning. Wrapping 3 large patio umbrella's in a tarp to take them to his warehouse to store but then taking them 90 minutes down the highway to the marina in the small open short bed of his truck, back to the warehouse and then back home again where he unloaded them and put them in his backyard with all his other seasonal items. Lying to police that night and telling them that his warehouse had no power when they were searching it. Bringing home the canvas boat cover to the boat that had never been at the house and storing it in a shed, under a leaf blower he had not used recently. The gas cap was conveniently loose enough to leak gas over the boat cover and the police had to hang it over the fence to air it out before taking it away as evidence. The boat cover was found to have bits of cement debris on it. Mopping the floors at home even though the housekeeper testified that she washed them all with pinesol only the day before.
@@jasonr9481Well done. Also, he took a freshwater boat to a salt water bay even though his family claims he's owned many boats before. As you said, 90-minute drive when there are plenty of other fresh water lakes closer to his house, and spent less than 30 minutes "fishing". Made his own anchor which was photographed in the boat but there's just one problem, there was no rope attached. How the hell was he going to anchor with it?
I mean, putting aside my personal opinion that this is a collosal waste of time and resources, these types of steps and retrials are actually important. It forces the authorities to adhere to an impeccable standard of work so that the convictions can remain safe. Of you submit sloppy work, leave glaring holes in your case, have liabilities of any kind its going to allow guilty individuals to walk free - and frankly I'm still shocked at the amount of sketchy cases making it to court. If anything, the retrial process will just reinforce the guilty verdict. And if it doesn't then serious questions and investigations need to be done over how the case was handled so thar something like this can NEVER happen again. Hopefully it would benefit all of us for the better.... but that honestly depends if departments are left to "investigate themselves" 🙄
1) it’s the LA IP, huge difference, and 2) that doesn’t change the fact that there’s a mound of evidence pointing to Scott. I don’t care if there were 10 break ins by different ppl, nothing negates the evidence.
this is disgusting. he was proven guilty- his actions & whereabouts- the evidence proved his guilt. NO! and who is this woman..a lawyer?? at least bathe before you come to court- out of respect for the house & judge... or respect for yourself & your client.
Have to find those four cement anchors Scott used to anchor Laci to the floor of San Francisco Bay - there may be some debris left that was found with the bodies - that would be concrete evidence
Make Scott Take a Polygraph Then Decide IF a New Trial Is In Order In His Defense Before Wasting Courts Time And The People's Money! Jus My Opinion on That!! One more thing!! How many times did the divers Search the bay and found nothing after nothing after nothing!! Then 5 months later Laci and Conner Wash Up On Shore. I don't know who would commit such a crime place a body in the bay and tell LE that's where you were fishing in the same area. Wouldn't a criminal say he was on the other side of the bay and not even mention about brooks island and the No Landing Sign There at the island Etc!! The Divers Looked and Looked For Days and Weeks into months searching in that area at the bay Where Scott Said he was fishing. I'm not Defending Scott But Some Things Don't Add Up If Anyone Has Done Their Own Research Instead of Listening To The " Worst Virus In America!! ( THE MEDIA)
This lady talking to the judge sounds like she's about to cry every single word that is spoken. Im not sure any of this is going to matter. He will still need another trial and not one single person on a jury panel wouldnt already have a negative opinion on this guy. Even if he is innocent for some strange reason, his life is over whether its in prison or not.
I’ve been following this case since when it happened.i don’t know why but her picture got my attention.He’s guilty!come on this is ridiculous 😤stop giving him attention!
Idk if he did it or not but just think about what it must feel like to rot away in prison for over two decades / the rest of your life / be put to death for a heinous crime you never committed!!! What an absolute tragedy that would be. Just know that there are TONS of people who belong in prison for life that aren't (Casey Anthony) and TONS of people in prison that are 100% innocent. We'll see what the DNA says I pray if he is innocent that he and the family can heal from this tragedy and hopefully find out who really did it !
He was tried He was convicted He is guilty, by court of law Why does he get another chance to lie Sharon Rocha does not deserve this charade again Give her peace SP deserves where he is- In his narcissism he believes his lies can manipulate again. He was tried in a double murder Let him alone Let him be God’s department As he rots where he belongs
Scott could have been framed cuz the police department got right on the main media and toad where he was at that day he was fishing I mean if she had been abducted by somebody they could have put her out in that bay cuz they know Scott had been out there they know that the Modesto Police department would automatically blame Scott for her death.. I just never saw the evidence to really put the nail in the coffin that he done it I mean I really didn't. This case should have been dismissed because there was a prejudice person on jury duty she was prejudiced going into it and the Modesto Police department is the total blame for this for their spotty police work and they got tunnel vision absolutely got tunnel vision. My heart goes out to Lacey's family because they're being put through this again and here they spent all these years thinking that their son-in-law killed their daughter and it's due to the Modesto Police department.
That theory is illogical... the police didn't announce where he was fishing until the beginning of January. So they kept her body for over a week on ice? ...in hopes that they would happen to say exactly where Scott was and then they found a boat and dumped her there while the Bay was being searched specifically so she would be found. Instead they weighed the body down so incredibly well that it only came up after a large unpredictable storm.
@@jasonr9481 they did tell the main media where Scott was at the question was asked and they did broadcast it on the main media news station apparently you didn't watch the trial I remember when it first happened and I watched it from beginning to end. He was guilty of cheating and everyone had it out for him after that just because he had cheated on her it don't make him a murderer it makes him an adulterer but not a murderer.. and besides he won't escape God's justice ⚖️ will all be judged on white throne judgement...
@@akamomakawife4928 It is a fact that they did not announce exactly where Scott "fished" until January 3rd. Previous to that police had said that Scott was fishing in the Bay, do you realize how massive that area is? How did you "watch the trial from beginning to end" when cameras and recorders were banned? You seem to be confused by getting your information and watching something else entirely.
@steelhurricane4041 did he appear guilty in some ways. But to me from all the evidence they had all they proved is he cheated on Laci that's all they proved the rest were they thought he did this or that
I would love all the people in this comment section who are so certain of his guilt to say what evidence actually proves his guilt!! Because this case wasn’t on TV and the only coverage it ever got was only one sided so please comment the actual evidence that proves this man’s guilt!! I’m sure most with have no info that wasn’t covered in the media. Most of these people only know what a biased media reported.
@@personalpandemicstoriesorg4707 I would say that most people saying Scott could be innocent have not read the trial transcripts, and typically only go by information derived from a biased documentary made by Scott's side.
You’re welcome to google it if you actually didn’t follow the case 🙄 by the way, since you seem like the type- circumstantial evidence IS just as weighted as forensic evidence. So the fact that he was in the exact spot where her body washed up months later- is quite a coincidence. You can research the rest. That is, if you actually want to know 😏
@@personalpandemicstoriesorg4707 it was not not-no cameras were allowed- No cameras or recorders in Scott Peterson trial Published: Aug 19, 2003, at 12:00 a.m.
I feel terrible for Lacey’s family they shouldn’t have to deal with this all over again it’s unfair and it’s cruel however Scott is a narcissist so he doesn’t care who he’s hurting
00:00 Scott Peterson Case Background
02:55 DNA Testing
13:22 Defense: DNA Evidence Issues
25:31 State Arguments: Who's Paying for the DNA Tests?
32:19 Defense: Lack of Evidence against Scott Peterson
35:46 Expert Analysis
#CourtTV Catch up on the #ScottPeterson case here:
www.courttv.com/tag/scott-peterson/?
Thank you for watching!
@@COURTTV that was from when his sentence was commuted not the original trial
Wish I could have heard the whole hearing. True Crime Matters with Tara Marie breaks down part of the motion. Mostly witnesses. They do have a declaration from the Medina's that the burglary was on the 24th. Steve Todd made the mistake of using the Medina's landline phone to call Glenn Pearce. That information was given to the police department but they kicked to the curb. There are also other witnesses declaratios. Enjoy if you watch it. It has 4 parts.@@COURTTV
Court TV have you heard anything yet about that piece of duck tape. I figured it would have been done with the testing by now.
What are the chances that “The burglars “ deposed of her body right where Scott was fishing. 🙄 I mean …seriously? The same day Lacy and Conner were identified, Scott dyed his hair, borrowed his brother’s photo ID , and headed for the Mexico border with over $10,000 in cash. I could go on. 🫤Too many RED FLAGS 🚩.
That’s what I’m saying! I don’t believe in coincidences especially in true crime. He’s 100 percent guilty and these fools are trying to get him a new trial to gain notoriety for their chapter of the innocence project! It’s disgusting
@@fearfullnature well, he didn't dye his hair on that day actually. He had met with police multiple times whilst his hair was blonde.
@@fearfullnature I’m I do t know but I’m pretty sure the police announced to the media where he was at the time of the murder which would allow someone to dispose of the body in that location since it wasn’t found until awhile after.
Seeing as Scott’s fishing on the day of her disappearance was all over the news that night it wouldn’t be that much of a coincidence
Simple: they released his alibi before the bodies were found. If other people had their bodies then they would have had the perfect place to put them.
I am very disappointed in the LA Innocence Project. I was pregnant at they same time as Lacey and between 1. His lies to his mistress during his wife’s candlelight vigil 2. Telling Amber that he had “lost” his wife 3. The boat bought right before his wife was murdered that no one knew about 4. His wife and child’s body washing up right where he gave his alibi at 5. The call to her mother and saying “she’s missing” before even making calls to friends in case she was picked up by a friend 6. The hair in the pliers….i can go on and on.
There are so many cases that deserve a deeper look but this isn’t one of them. What a slap in Sharron’s face!
@@Treesah0416 I am with you completely.
We ALL watched the trial .. Scott is GUILTY! All mother’s knew what he did ! So , much evidence!
Innocent people don’t run to the border with different hair color , 10,000 cash and brother’s passport on the day your wife and child are found washed up on a bay that he happened to be fishing on when no one knew he had a boat he hid it in a storage facility ! When Lacey’s step father asked him , you have a boat and Scott said yes I bought it for you !!
I could go on and on ….this burns me
Yes, and if I recall correctly he had just gotten a fishing license a day or two before. And then the sudden travel plans? Yeah right.....@@unoimright5153
@@Treesah0416 I was pregnant the same time Lacy was too and where they found the remains is on a trail by the bay I used to frequent all the time. He is 100 percent guilty and nothing will change that. They expect us to believe that he went to the Berkeley Marina on a bad day weather wise because I remember and the very same day Lacy goes missing and months later her and Conners remains not very far from where Scott was?? Yeah right! No one framed him no one was after them. They lived a low risk lifestyle so I don’t believe that theory either. The man is where he needs to be and if he gets a new trial based on a stupid technicality that would be devastating! Let Lacy and Conner Rip! Shame on the LA innocence project! They are barking up the wrong tree cause this monster is guilty on all counts!
Excellent comment...I always thought that a real nail in his coffin was when he told Amber that it would be his first Christmas without his deceased wife...while she was still alive!
The L.A. Innocence Project has lost all credibility.
L.A. stands for Losers of America!
You don’t know what they know. Keep an open mind. If that was you in jail wouldn’t you want someone to listen to you if you know you’re innocent ? Don’t let the horror of this case cloud your thinking
It Is LA!
@@Evolutiontweaked🙄 pull your head out
They're not the real Innocence Project, they hijacked the name for false credibility! The real Innocence Project people are pissed!
I can't believe anyone would think he's innocent. It's disturbing to think he might get a new trial.
@@lollyplopperblue6239 it is very very difficult to get a new trial … if there is one that says a lot
The only person who thinks he’s innocent is his deranged sister in law who literally got a law degree to fight his case. I think she’s obsessed with him…
Your god
@@musclerussell8109 your momma
It stresses me out that anyone thinks he’s innocent at this point.
It’s not many. There will always be SOME weirdos that align themselves with the OBVIOUS murd3rer- whoever that is. Because they’re mentally ill , delulu, or in denial. Chris watts, Jodi arias? Scott P? It doesn’t matter- there will always be *those* Ppl. 🤡
Exactly 🤬
FREE SCOTT!
Free Scott
No way ,,he is getting out,,,,,,,, guilty as hell
Casey Anthony
@@fairlyvague82Well that case is completely different than this one. Scott was convicted of the crime. Casey was not
They convicted the wrong person….the killers are still out there.
Lawdy, will he just be quiet already. He knows he is guilty
everyone knows he's guilty
Narcissists can't be quiet because they can't handle being wrong, and the very much hate being irrelevant 😅
He’s phycho
It’s sad that resources are being wasted on this case. There are so many actions he took that point to his guilt, not innocence.
He never mentioned his son not once or shed a tear
He never loved Connor.
He tried to start another life with a woman while his wife was pregnant
He told the other woman he didn't want kids while his wife was 8 months pregnant
He lied to the other woman while he was at his wife's search party
He secretly bought a boat
His dead wife & son were found in the waterway where his secret bought boat went into water
When he was caught he went in disguise & tried to flee to Mexico
He had high paid lawyers
Lets actually use the innocence project for those who are actually innocent and don't have access to proper resources & representation
How much money did the Peterson's "donate" to The LA Innocence Project to take his case...I wonder!
I bet this is the exact reason why they got involved 😏
My thoughts exactly!
I do not think his parents are alive at this point. He is guilty
Scott has two sisters who think he's innocent, so maybe they were involved with donating to the LA Innocence Project.
@@mac609 I'm sure they did. Janey also did some interning with an organization related to LA Innocence Project. I'm sure she schmoozed her way in there.
Makes no sense to me, he murdered his wife carrying his first child (son) to be with a single mother 😳🥴🤦♀️
Scott Peterson is definitely reaching if he thinks that somehow he can spin his horrible crime and make it seem like he is innocent. I think it’s fair to say he will be spending the rest of his days in jail as it should be.
You would think an organization called the innocence project would actually focus on innocent ppl 🤦
They focus on the evidence and investigation integrity. I just don't think it was a good case.
💰💵 💸 🤑
It’s not the real Innocence Project, it’s a knockoff
Is that a real innocence project or is that a walmart innocence project? 😆
This is so ridiculous. He was guilty then and is still guilty. The Innocence Project has lost all credibility fighting for this guy.
Aww, baby Vinnie!
I don't think she believes her own words.
They want to DNA test the tape that was found on Laci’s body when recovered from the bay. How could there still be DNA on tape after being in salt water for approx. 4 months?
You’d be amazed
@winkieblink7625 Did they check to see if Scott had a roll of duct tape either at his home or his shop. To see if it matches the duct tape found on Laci.
Vinnie ages like a fine wine. 🍷 I really appreciate Vinnie for the empathy and compassion for the victims that he brings to his reporting.
Thank you for watching!
is this his lawyer.looks luke she hasnt washed her hair in a month.
Sadly, I agree☝️
Dude went fishing on a cold winter morning. His wife's body found in the same area. He's as guilty as the day is long. Should've gotten the chair years ago.
I guess ice fishing is 🐠 AF then
@@BigAlWillis he went fishing on a cold winter morning, when he had NEVER been fishing before in that bay or in that boat, or ever as a hobby at all. With tackles that was not opened.
Ugh. No! Oh ok so the two cleared suspects just happened to take Laci's body to the exact spot Scott was fishing? Did they follow him hundreds of miles not knowing where he was going just hoping he would go to a large body of water so they could dump her there and pin the murder on him? Ridiculous.
The prosecutor is HORRIBLE! She sounds nervous and has such a cracking voice and its a pain to listen to her
She's like Christine Blasey Ford accusing Brett Kavanaugh during the Senate hearing.
A read they want to DNA test the tape that was found on Laci’s body when recovered from the bay. How could there still be DNA on tape after being in salt water for approx. 4 months?
DNA is soluble in water. That means it can dissolve in water. However, it is not soluble when alcohol and salt are present
If u havent watched the 5 part special on this case, you should. Its super interesting
Where can I watch it ?
The A&E one?
Part 5?
I followed the entire case from the day Laci was gone. I followed the events and evidence and what I heard from the courtroom. I have Zero doubt of his guilt.
@@valleygirl2530Why is the state not cooperating with the defense? Why won't they allow the defense to test the evidence? If, they know they have the right man, they should turn over everything, so that SP can get a new trial, if he is innocent as he claims.
Hes not getting out .
Not exactly LITERALLY held by duct tape
Wonder what does Amber think of all this? What about the concrete blocks same as the ones in his house, evidence in the house.
There are four cement anchors still missing - they have to find those in the Bay and see if there's anything can link them to Laci's body
Okay, So Chris Watts is innocent too?
Same thing, they wanted to be with the mistresses.
Give me a break!! 😡
He still thinks he can outsmart everyone.
Hence, the arrogant smirk.
Nice trying, guilty
So IF I’m on his new jury and I hear evidence of foreign DNA on the duct tape - I’m asking “Is that all you got?” GUILTY - Still.
But I’m confused.. won’t Scott’s dna show on the tape? He did it, so I feel like go ahead and text the tape, right?
Guilty as a mudder fudder, then , and now
This guy Peterson is cold blooded. He should just man up and come clean.
Wash your hair
No no new trial please!! He is & was so guilty
I thought his case was dismissed
Heck no you must be kidding? This is not Alec Baldwin! It’s Scott Peterson hearing , who murdered his pregnant wife in 90’s!
@@Juke582 2002
LA innocence project is very disappointing......... they are reaching.
Good old Vinnie in his younger years ☺️
He should stay exactly where he is and never see the light again.
These people will leave an innocent person with empirical proof of innocence in prison until they get around to it.
But when their people are clearly guilty alwhite
It could be DNA from the person who sold the duct tape. The tape could have nothing to do with case and it just attached to Laci in the ocean before she was discovered.
When discussing convicted killer Scott Peterson I think it’s so important to keep repeating that in no way are the La innocence project affiliated with the innocence project. The innocence project themselves have made a statement saying this. The La innocence project have hi jacked the innocence project name in order to try and give themselves credibility. This is an absolute waste of time and resources on a family annihilator with the empathy and feelings of a psychopath. If he does get a new trial I hope it’s televised so the world can watch him be proven guilty again
Did Proctor’s dad work on this case?? Cause I’ve definitely seen a worse chain of custody
😂
Hes prob guilty but I understand why theyre taking on this case. Theres A&E documentary showing a lot of evidence and leads the cops didn’t look into that made me rethink this whole thing and at the very least believe he deserves a new trial
Sorry to hear you fell for the Peterson family documentary.
I followed the case very closely and in my opinion the evidence against him was completely overwhelming down to even the finest of details. Investigators could have spent years chasing red herrings and it would still have come down to Scott Peterson.
It’s not the “Peterson family documentary”. Good grief!
@@brennanhuff2960 *Always*
All the prosecutors need to do is legally collect evidence and support their charges against the suspect. They’re not obligated to investigate EVERYTHING everywhere. The JURY has the final say. They said GUILTY of 2 Homicides. DONE.
You should did this as you did not act upset at all having her disappear 8 months pregnant and have no feelings of her dead along with your baby son. No man acts so cold after this happens like you did back then.
It is Tuesday July 16th. What was the decision?
I think she meant July 22
This was posted 47 minutes ago, so looks like they're running behind....
@@deenak79 They mentioned Alec Baldwin, and he was acquitted with prejudice last week (I think).
@@lillyshaw9439not acquitted, dismissed
@@lillyshaw9439acquitted means found not guilty. Baldwin didn’t get a verdict because the case got tossed. That’s very different. He will forever have it looming over his head.
7:25 Yikes- she seems like she's about to burst into tears.
There are plenty of reasons why he's guilty, but to point to just one, if Laci was abducted by the burglars returning from her walk or leaving for her walk, she would have been found in black pants and a white top. This is what the "witnesses" Janey put forward say they saw her wearing. This is what Scott says she was wearing and this is what was put on the flyers. However she was found in her own khaki/tan pants, from her favourite store, in her size. She has to have returned home and gotten changed and then gone back outside or the burglars kindly bought her a new outfit. So let's say she got home and got changed to go out, why did she leave the leash on the dog not once but twice, something according to Scott she didn't do. In fact the first thing Scott did on returning home was to remove the leash. Why did she got outside with no purse, no keys, no phone. She couldn't have seen the burglars from the window, the curtains were drawn. If she saw them on her walk and was concerned, she could have confronted them then and there. Why would she go inside, get changed and go outside with nothing, just to confront them? And before the Scott defenders tell me that's just who Laci was, it actually wasn't. What she was, was a heavily pregnant woman who had been complaining about her fatigue, who had a bunch of stuff to do that day, who the housekeeper said had to sit after going grocery shopping. So she is not going to rush out the door to confront burglars after walking her dog and mopping the floor.
@SavannahJ79, I agree with u.
Exactly
This man is guilty ! I’m sick of yall with the white privilege card! This man killed his wife I don’t care what nobody says !! This man never shed not 1 tear .. never searched for her ! Told the mistress his wife was dead !!!! They were out searching for her !!! This can’t be real !!! Smh
Lol white privilege card? Cause black ppl haven’t been released from prison after a second look was done (sarcasm) 🤡 this is why ppl don’t take these comments seriously anymore.
👍👍👍💯
Wait Alec's case was dismissed.... I'm confused
Seems like we're walking down the O.J. Simpson path.
No! Peterson did it and doesn’t deserve a new trial
He’s a narcissistic sociopath
How can this evil monster get a new trial?
Why? EGO !
What damaging evidence? Please elaborate and if you say lying and cheating, this conversation is over.
People don’t have anything they can provide that wasn’t put out by the media. They all are certain of his guilt yet the trial wasn’t televised and the only info the public received was biased one sided media coverage. People allow their emotions to cloud their judgement and they don’t even realize how much they don’t know
No sign of Laci being alive on December 24th but plenty of evidence of Scott being around all morning and all day (if the defense had one relevant witness they would have testified in court). Scott researching the tides, currents in the Bay and around Brook's Island before he even bought the boat. Buying a secret boat. Buying a 2 day fishing licence specifically for the 23rd and 24th on December 20th for a supposed unplanned, last minute fishing trip. No explanation for where all that extra cement from a 90lb bag went. One of Laci's hairs wrapped around the working end of a pair of pliers in his boat. Someone saw Scott loading something large wrapped in a tarp into his truck that morning. Wrapping 3 large patio umbrella's in a tarp to take them to his warehouse to store but then taking them 90 minutes down the highway to the marina in the small open short bed of his truck, back to the warehouse and then back home again where he unloaded them and put them in his backyard with all his other seasonal items. Lying to police that night and telling them that his warehouse had no power when they were searching it. Bringing home the canvas boat cover to the boat that had never been at the house and storing it in a shed, under a leaf blower he had not used recently. The gas cap was conveniently loose enough to leak gas over the boat cover and the police had to hang it over the fence to air it out before taking it away as evidence. The boat cover was found to have bits of cement debris on it. Mopping the floors at home even though the housekeeper testified that she washed them all with pinesol only the day before.
@@jasonr9481Well done. Also, he took a freshwater boat to a salt water bay even though his family claims he's owned many boats before. As you said, 90-minute drive when there are plenty of other fresh water lakes closer to his house, and spent less than 30 minutes "fishing". Made his own anchor which was photographed in the boat but there's just one problem, there was no rope attached. How the hell was he going to anchor with it?
😂😂😂
@@majalca98jumping in to add on how he told Amber that hid wife was dead days before she actually died
I mean, putting aside my personal opinion that this is a collosal waste of time and resources, these types of steps and retrials are actually important.
It forces the authorities to adhere to an impeccable standard of work so that the convictions can remain safe.
Of you submit sloppy work, leave glaring holes in your case, have liabilities of any kind its going to allow guilty individuals to walk free - and frankly I'm still shocked at the amount of sketchy cases making it to court.
If anything, the retrial process will just reinforce the guilty verdict.
And if it doesn't then serious questions and investigations need to be done over how the case was handled so thar something like this can NEVER happen again.
Hopefully it would benefit all of us for the better.... but that honestly depends if departments are left to "investigate themselves" 🙄
DNA doesn't need 4 new trial . It will say guilty or innocent.
Hopefully he didn't use gloves like Casey Anthony did 🤬
Why didn’t she wash her hair before she went to court? It’s all greasy. 😟😑
Right?
Thank you so much for this! I was going to say…..
Unnecessary waste of taxpayer money
Whatever, someone from the outside is working with him to free him.
What are you talking about... Dna does not need a new trial it will either be stay in prison, or vo home.
"A nothing berger"
Janey Peterson must Truly be in LOVE with Scott, Her "husband" Can't SEE This??
There was a robbery across the street. I certainly don’t believe he is innocent. But I can see why the innocence project looked into it.
The burglary was investigated and occurred on December 26th, two days after Laci went missing.
1) it’s the LA IP, huge difference, and 2) that doesn’t change the fact that there’s a mound of evidence pointing to Scott. I don’t care if there were 10 break ins by different ppl, nothing negates the evidence.
Guilty as hell!!
this is disgusting. he was proven guilty- his actions & whereabouts- the evidence proved his guilt. NO!
and who is this woman..a lawyer?? at least bathe before you come to court- out of respect for the house & judge... or respect for yourself & your client.
Have to find those four cement anchors Scott used to anchor Laci to the floor of San Francisco Bay - there may be some debris left that was found with the bodies - that would be concrete evidence
Make Scott Take a Polygraph Then Decide IF a New Trial Is In Order In His Defense Before Wasting Courts Time And The People's Money!
Jus My Opinion on That!!
One more thing!!
How many times did the divers Search the bay and found nothing after nothing after nothing!! Then 5 months later Laci and Conner Wash Up On Shore. I don't know who would commit such a crime place a body in the bay and tell LE that's where you were fishing in the same area. Wouldn't a criminal say he was on the other side of the bay and not even mention about brooks island and the No Landing Sign There at the island Etc!! The Divers Looked and Looked For Days and Weeks into months searching in that area at the bay Where Scott Said he was fishing. I'm not Defending Scott But Some Things Don't Add Up If Anyone Has Done Their Own Research Instead of Listening To The " Worst Virus In America!!
( THE MEDIA)
This is old......
Unbelievable, shame on LA I P
What a waste of the innocence project he's guilty af
Glad to see Julie less bias
This lady talking to the judge sounds like she's about to cry every single word that is spoken. Im not sure any of this is going to matter. He will still need another trial and not one single person on a jury panel wouldnt already have a negative opinion on this guy. Even if he is innocent for some strange reason, his life is over whether its in prison or not.
He's pretty arrogant to feel confident enough that something is on that tape. Grasping as straws seeing what sticks i guess.
Lawyers don't wash their hair now. That's a serious lawyer? Well at least when that creep is denied he can say he didn't have a proper lawyer.
That was the prosecution lawyer
Tape is from the ocean ?
FREE SCOTT!
I’ve been following this case since when it happened.i don’t know why but her picture got my attention.He’s guilty!come on this is ridiculous 😤stop giving him attention!
Go away Scott. We’ve had enough of you. This has been going on way too long. You are guilty!
I am surviving they kept the evidence all these years.
Idk if he did it or not but just think about what it must feel like to rot away in prison for over two decades / the rest of your life / be put to death for a heinous crime you never committed!!! What an absolute tragedy that would be. Just know that there are TONS of people who belong in prison for life that aren't (Casey Anthony) and TONS of people in prison that are 100% innocent. We'll see what the DNA says I pray if he is innocent that he and the family can heal from this tragedy and hopefully find out who really did it !
He was tried
He was convicted
He is guilty, by court of law
Why does he get another chance to lie
Sharon Rocha does not deserve this charade again
Give her peace
SP deserves where he is-
In his narcissism he believes his lies can manipulate again.
He was tried in a double murder
Let him alone
Let him be God’s department
As he rots where he belongs
DNA will tell the truth one way or another finally.
I have heard that this is not the original Innocence Project. Just same name
@@robertshows5100 it’s the LA innocence project. Not affiliated with The innocence project. Two separate entities.
This^
Hey hey Hey there
HI!
🙄
is this woman an inmate,??
5:00 she's looks like shes been out partying Did she even wash her hair?
The only reason im watchn this circus is to check on laci moma and see how she is holding up❤
This makes me sick that this will cause her more grief and pain. God bless Sharon Rocha and the rest of the family
Scott's dna on tape if any. Duh.
Free scott
Scott could have been framed cuz the police department got right on the main media and toad where he was at that day he was fishing I mean if she had been abducted by somebody they could have put her out in that bay cuz they know Scott had been out there they know that the Modesto Police department would automatically blame Scott for her death.. I just never saw the evidence to really put the nail in the coffin that he done it I mean I really didn't. This case should have been dismissed because there was a prejudice person on jury duty she was prejudiced going into it and the Modesto Police department is the total blame for this for their spotty police work and they got tunnel vision absolutely got tunnel vision. My heart goes out to Lacey's family because they're being put through this again and here they spent all these years thinking that their son-in-law killed their daughter and it's due to the Modesto Police department.
That theory is illogical... the police didn't announce where he was fishing until the beginning of January. So they kept her body for over a week on ice? ...in hopes that they would happen to say exactly where Scott was and then they found a boat and dumped her there while the Bay was being searched specifically so she would be found. Instead they weighed the body down so incredibly well that it only came up after a large unpredictable storm.
@@jasonr9481 they did tell the main media where Scott was at the question was asked and they did broadcast it on the main media news station apparently you didn't watch the trial I remember when it first happened and I watched it from beginning to end. He was guilty of cheating and everyone had it out for him after that just because he had cheated on her it don't make him a murderer it makes him an adulterer but not a murderer.. and besides he won't escape God's justice ⚖️ will all be judged on white throne judgement...
@@akamomakawife4928 It is a fact that they did not announce exactly where Scott "fished" until January 3rd. Previous to that police had said that Scott was fishing in the Bay, do you realize how massive that area is? How did you "watch the trial from beginning to end" when cameras and recorders were banned? You seem to be confused by getting your information and watching something else entirely.
Scott Is Innocent
free Scott he's innocent
Nope
I agree with you. Scott is innocent.
@steelhurricane4041 did he appear guilty in some ways. But to me from all the evidence they had all they proved is he cheated on Laci that's all they proved the rest were they thought he did this or that
@@steelhurricane4041 Scott is guilty.
I would love all the people in this comment section who are so certain of his guilt to say what evidence actually proves his guilt!! Because this case wasn’t on TV and the only coverage it ever got was only one sided so please comment the actual evidence that proves this man’s guilt!! I’m sure most with have no info that wasn’t covered in the media. Most of these people only know what a biased media reported.
This case absolutely was aired live on court t.v.
Why are you posting this lie? It absolutely was televised on court tv.
@@personalpandemicstoriesorg4707 I would say that most people saying Scott could be innocent have not read the trial transcripts, and typically only go by information derived from a biased documentary made by Scott's side.
You’re welcome to google it if you actually didn’t follow the case 🙄 by the way, since you seem like the type- circumstantial evidence IS just as weighted as forensic evidence. So the fact that he was in the exact spot where her body washed up months later- is quite a coincidence. You can research the rest. That is, if you actually want to know 😏
@@personalpandemicstoriesorg4707 it was not not-no cameras were allowed- No cameras or recorders in Scott Peterson trial
Published: Aug 19, 2003, at 12:00 a.m.
California? Not surprised tbh.
Watching a frozenBOTOX-face talk is like watching a Stepford wife.
😂
👍🏻
I feel terrible for Lacey’s family they shouldn’t have to deal with this all over again it’s unfair and it’s cruel however Scott is a narcissist so he doesn’t care who he’s hurting