At 12:10 I said that the Tamron is made of plastic. It isn't - it's actually mostly metal however the section from the focus ring to the front element including the filter thread is plastic. It's similar composition in terms of materials to the Sigma.
@backfilms Actually the lens is pretty much the closest thing to a Zeiss lens in terms of build quality, and at least it had extensive weather sealing compared to the Otus series...
Tamron 35mm 1.4 is the best 35mm present in the market. It has performed better than Canon, Nikon, Sigma and many others hand down. If some one is looking for a 35mm, Tamron deserves a trial.. the choice will then be obvious.
@@lifeofapotato4595 Except the price... If L II will costs only 200$ more, I'll say, yes, you'r right. But at this time Tamron is the exceptional fine choice in quality/price parameter and if you aren't super pro photographer, you don't need L II. By the way Tamron have a lowcost dock-station, that can solve problems with autofocusing accuracy at DSLRS at home, and Canon doesn't, only in cammera settings...
I just bought Tamron 35mm f1.4 in January this year and I must say that it's better than the Sigma. Tamron is sharper at f1.4 both at the centre and along the edges than Sigma at F/1.4
@@MitchLally Several sites that specialize in technical lens testing and comparison show the Tamron outperforming the 35 L in sharpness, CA, coma, etc. and it has smoother bokeh than the L. This makes the Tamron an amazing value at less than half the price of the Canon. Value wise, I was happy to pay an extra $200 over the Sigma (which is a very nice lens, as you have shown).
@@TheCogitech so you said to buy the tamron well I'm going to buy the tamron i don't feel like buying different brand names if i buy the tamron i want everything in tamron. So what you think about the tamron 10-24 wide angle lens.
@@MitchLally mitch let me ask you this how many lens do you really need? I want the 1. 50mm 2. 35mm 3. 85mm 4. 10-24 5. 17-55 6. 18-400 All tamron and canon
@@taquandriaadams3389 did You buy it? Tamron had a instant rebate about 3 months ago whereas the price was $100 more than their 35mm 1.8 so I jumped on it!! I didn't realize my images COULD BE THAT SHARP! I'm glad I bought mine! It makes a great lens for your Crop Sensor body and video filmmaking!
I have owned the Tamron 35mm for three years now and it has served me well. I have never had issues with sharpness. Or even blurry images because of the image stabilization. Very happy with my Tamron.
was going to settle on the 1.8 until i saw the 1.4--now do i rent that for all paid work or just buy the 1.8 and be satisifed with it as an all-rounder? decisions, decisions!
I really like the Tamron tbh, it renders a bit like Canon glass with that slight swirl in the bokeh 😍 Reminds me of the 85mm 1.2 and 100mm 2.8 etc. I think that’s the kind of magic you cannot add in post!
Both lenses seem great. I have fought on whether to get the Tamron 35mm f/1.4 or the Sigma 40mm Art f/1.4 . I went with the Sigma . One reason was the weather sealing . I shoot live music photography and videography. Outside in high humidity I’ve had problems with my Tamron 15-30mm fogging up . I also have a couple Sigma non weathersealed lenses and never had an issue with this fogging problem. Even my best or most expensive Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 e fl vr will fog but never the Sigmas . I’m super hard on my equipment. A lot of heat to cold , cold rain to hot and muggy weather, banging and bouncing around on trucks , trailers and golf carts . The Sigmas just seem tough as nails . The Tamron has been through hell and back too but hasn’t held up like my Nikon and Sigma counterparts. After debating over the Tamron 15-30 or the Nikon 14-24 I wish I’d went with the Nikon . Now that being said this new Tamron 35mm sp f/1.4 is supposed to be the best built Tamron ever . These are my observations with my equipment, others may have a different experience. And to end this I do love the oof (bokeh) rendering with the Tamron. It’s just gorgeous! Peace y’all
Not worth it. I had both and returned the RF35. It's not even close for overall IQ. It fails mainly in the bokeh quality and CA. More nervous bokeh with lots of CA in backlit situations. I do miss the OIS for quick b roll though.
Just another great informative and entertaining video Mitch. Really appreciate all your work. Not so easy to decide which one I would choose. I even think about the Canon RF 35 f1.8
Thank you for the comparison! When I saw that you started using Tamron lenses I was curious about the quality difference. I personally just got the Sigma 18-35.
I have and have had the Sigma 18-35 since it first came out . This lens has been my bread and butter on my crop sensor nikon d500 . I absolutely love it . But it’s been a love hate relationship. Before the d500 body I really struggled with af consistency. On a mirrorless body you should have no problems. The focal lenght is super useful, the 18mm end is sublime and the most distortion free 18mm I’ve used . With a 27mm fov equivalent on Nikon it beats out most 28mm even up to the edges being distortion free. I’ve used this lens a ton for video on a SteadyCam and a gimbal . Shooting live music on large stages the people look normal in their perspective even on the edges. You got a keeper and a legend in my book .
Can either of these lenses be used in a run and gun video situation? Wasn't sure if the AF motor sound would be picked up by an on camera microphone. I'd love to save some money in sticking with some EF mounted glass, but the RF lenses are just so dang silent it's hard to not just go native.
I always use external sound. I don’t think on camera shotgun mics are a good solution for anything but scratch audio. Even in run and gun I use lapel mics for the people I’m filming. Having said that they both have some noise. Tamron is the more quiet of the two. I haven’t tested it extensively as it isn’t a massive issue for me.
@@MitchLally Yeah, it's definitely not idea. Just tough for event coverage and I'm not set up for just a single person and don't always having time to mic someone.
Hi Mitch. Nice video, congratulations. I take shots in dark gyms and was torn between the two. Which is the fastest to chase the focus of a fast subject?
Mitch, any issues with peripheral illumination correction when using the non native lenses? I've tried both the tamron and sigma on my EOS R wit the adapter and was forced to return both due to a very pronounced circular shadow in the picture. I've been sticking with native EF lenses since then but missing out on some deals because of it..
When you are shooting against the strong backlit sun like that, are you using spot metering on her face, or are you just adding a bit of compensation until it looked good? Thanks.
Neither. Full manual mode and expose by eye. Metering is less relevant with mirrorless cameras as you can see a representation of your exposure before you take the shot. Over time you learn how to expose based on how the image looks and also to make judgements based off saving highlights vs sacrificing highlights.
Seems that the Tamron is for you if your on a budget but still care a lot about the quality of your lens and your willing to pay more for the higher quality option. The sigma is for if your on more of a budget! Both are great options. The price difference is around 200 dollars from 300 on the Sigma and 500 0n the Tamron. Keep up the great videos!
Currently have the Sigma, been looking at the Tamron. I have to say the wide open performance of the Sigma has always been uninspiring to me. Not terrible, but the Tamron has a clear advantage, especially in the corners. Lately, I have had trouble using the Sigma on my R5. Every time I try to use eye AF the camera locks up. It's got to the point that I no longer bother to use it on that camera. Does anyone else have this issue? Is there a work around?
I own Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art since 2012 amazing lens for money. I paid £520 and now it's £620 in the UK Bargain lens 👌 can't wait for RF version to come out
Hey man, Love the video I came here wanting a review for the Sigma 35mm to see how well it performs but now I kinda want the Tamron haha. Also though where the hell is this location it looks amazing!
Hi, I've been following your work for a long time, you're great! I now have an important question, have you tried the Tamron 85mm f 1.8 please? I am actually considering an upgrade with the Canon 85 f1.8, as I received a very good offer, does this glass work perfectly fine on the RF? are there any problems with focusing ?
Hey there Mitch. Looks, have you faced any problems with the sigma AF? Heard awful lot. I gues because you are using the EOS R you didn't see any problems right.
I rarely use this focal length and rented one, in the spring, for a Senior session. I got the Sigma but the AF was WAY off and I didn't have time to fool with it so I took it back and traded it for the Tamron. Perfect AF every time!
Bought the Tamron, all the focusing issues and needing to calibrate just scared me off. I have had NO issues with Tamron, I bought it brand new and it’s absolutely a beast
I'm torn between the Canon 35mm 1.4 L II and the Tamron.. I really like the look of the Canon lens, there's just something about it and I don't know why (maybe I'm just biased though). I have a really good deal at the moment on the canon one for 1000 bucks, as good as new. What would you do? Very informative video. New sub! :)
well i want a good camera that's full frame one that takes great pictures and video. i was told to buy this camera so i want to know a lot about this camera. i want to buy the tamron 24-70 and the tamron 35-150. you said it's only good for taking pictures and not for shooting video. well please tell me a good full frame camera please so i can check it out.
Nice comparison and shots - I'm thinking the Tamron is a bit more contrasty but not much between them. The only thing that puts me off the 1.4 is the size, most subjects will think you're pointing a telephoto at them.
been waiting for this review! really explained both lenses pretty well, and the photos looked great on both.. does the extra length on the tamron bother you at all?
Hi. Thank you so much for comparative. On a 20mp 6d for me is best sigma. (I had two) Sigma produces a better and cinematic rendering and more neutral and pure color, tamron produce much more warm colors maybe too more dirty. And other apertures than 1.4 sigma may be the same or sharper, always speaking on canon 6d. but I am curious to know if these results, especially in sharpness, can change in cameras with many more megapixels since I have not been able to test this...but on 6d honestly i would stay with sigma, too. I am also curious how the new sigma dg dn compares to this tamron, too bad this new sigma can only be enjoyed at sony, they say the new sigma is better than the old one but i also have my doubts about the color it produces rendering contrast etc because not everything is sharpness. Greetings and thanks! 🙋♂️
Had 3 Sigma 35mm lenses go loose on me and I'm a bit sick of it tbh, so tomorrow I'm trying the Tamron to see if I'm going to switch. Great review though, thanks man
Great video been trying to determine if I should go with the 35 or 50 mm focal length and I’m leaning towards the 50 because I think 35 is a little to wide but still an overall great and in-depth video keep up the great work and stay safe
Mitch Lally i have the 85 1.2 RF and want so much to get the 50 RF but i feel like it’s too close of a focal length between the two! So far i am using the cheap 35 1.8 macro but not sure what to do! Any thoughts ?
@@moealyasini2784 I think 50 and 85 are very different. Not a bad thing to have a 50 in the bag. The 1.2 is a crazy lens $$ wise so might be worth trying it for a while and picking between 50/85 once you have more time using it. To me 50 is nice but I prefer using 35 and 85 as my go to focal lengths - they both have really clear uses - 35 for showing some of the background and 85 for isolating the subject. The 50 is kinda in the middle it doesn't really do either of those things super well.
Mitch Lally i agree ! The 50mm is good if you only have one to choose! Since i can never live without the 85mm which is why I came to the EOS R system believe it or not haha so I might stick to the 35 1.8 till they come up with a 35 1.4 or even 1.2 haha
@@MitchLally I felt same way for very long time until I bought RF 50mm F1.2. I sold 24 70 and 70 200 and trying to stick with this one lens for a bit. Trying to be more creative. However, this 35mm F1.4 Tamron lense is so....tempting.
Just got the Tamron 35mm f1.4 today, coming from the Tamron 35mm f1.8. Can’t wait to stretch its legs! Would be interesting to compare the RF35mm f1.8 against both of these lenses.
I bought the Tamron as soon as it came out... what a stunning lens it is, and that opinion is obviously shared by Sigma, which within a week of the Tamron landing on the market, was offering discounts on ther own 35mm. Sadly, for me, the Tamron 35mm and a number of other of their great lenses are having compatibility issues with the Canon R5 and R6 (not the R nor the RP). I did a long session of dance photography with the 70-200mm on Thursday on my new Canon R6 and things seemed to be ok. The 35mm however lags a bit and nulifies the IS on the camera. Tamron put out a press release in July re this particular lends saying they are "working on updates" but I saw yesterday that the company put out another press release late November listing a number of other lenses. Such a pity. I have been a Tamron fan for a while and the 35mm is simply a winner, but a winner facing problems it would seem.
They just released the firmware update for the 35 and 17-35 and the lenses work now with the image stabiliser. You need to buy the dock to do a firmware update though :( or send the lens back to tamron.
Thank-you for a very helpful video, Mitch! I am about to "pull the plug" and pick up the Tamron for my portrait photography. I recently picked up the Sigma 50mm 1.4 ART used from KEH, and absolutely love it. So I know and agree with you, that Sigma is no "slouch." But everything I'm reading about the Tamron, including Matthew Saville on SLR Lounge lauds the Tamron as being bang for buck as good (or better) than Canon's EF 35mm 1.4 II. I own the EOS-R, as you utilized in this video. Your tone is upbeat and your video is fun. And I am much more "into" real world use than specs, too. So you really helped me today! I also respect Julia Trotti a ton (below) with her comment, so clearly your comparison was much needed. Mitch, all my best! Please pass along my compliments to your model, too. She is AMAZING! Great natural poses and vibrant as the sun behind her! Scott :)
Nice video. I switch over Tamron for the same problem you have with Sigma lens got it loss. I'm got it surprise for the good result for Tamron and I kept with me.
I went with the Tamron for the nice rendering and softer bokeh. I will say though that I miss the artifacts and glare when shooting into the sun. It loses some of the character without them. So I'll have to use my Sigma 50mm 1.4 for those shots
Just shooting wide open at 1.4 is all you need to know: the Tamron is nearly double the resolution, ready for the latest sensors. And then the weather proofing seals the deal. Why Sigma didn't properly dust and moisture proof the Art I'll never understand.
Great review, it's been said in other reviews that a calibration accessory could be another piece you need if deciding to own/purchase the sigma, my question is if the Tamron requires anything similar and or is the lens able to continue to focus without the need of such an accessory?
Ok, some knowledge... What this almost certainly is referring to is the USB dock you can get to go with their lenses. Sigma and Tamron both make one, and it is not required for the lens to focus, it is only required for things like firmware updates, lens calibration, and certain features can be turned on/off/adjusted through it. It is useful to have, I would suggest it if you own Sigma or Tamron lenses. You would need one of each if you own both Sigma and Tamron, since they only work on their own brand. Often BnH and Adorama will include one with a lens; its a frequent deal they offer. For the focus adjust, you only need to do this for DSLR cameras. If using a mirrorless, the on-sensor AF system is far more accurate than a DSLR, and thus does not require any kind of adjustment. Same can be said for the liveview of DSLR cameras, as they use a similar system for AF.
I have the Sigma 35 Art and EOS-R and was wondering how the new Tamron compares. THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO. It was really darn close! Btw, one advantage to the Sigma is that with the latest firmware update, in camera lens corrections are now workable (not on the Tamron) which is great for video. Also, the new Sigma firmware gives better AF performance and compatibility with the EOS-R.
Tamron made out of plastic? uhhhhh... no. no it's not, it's metal. Clearly the Tamron has better build quality if it has weather sealing & Sigma has quality control problems with the mount...
Yeah you're right Jaymin, it is metal on the bottom part below the focus ring - similar to the Sigma. Don't know why I said plastic in the video - my mistake.
Almost all the tests he says that Tamron performs a little better, a little faster....and then in the end he says: "if you are asking for my recommendation on which one to go for, I think Sigma is a great option". Confused.
@@MitchLally In every single choice (within reason), I go with the better lens. After a while, you'll forget about the money saved, and will have spent it on something else, but you'll never forget the other lens was a little better.
At 12:10 I said that the Tamron is made of plastic. It isn't - it's actually mostly metal however the section from the focus ring to the front element including the filter thread is plastic. It's similar composition in terms of materials to the Sigma.
How on earth does a 20 year old afford all this gear??????????? Rich parents??????????????
@@no15minutecities This is satire right?
Both won't compare to all metal design by Zeiss classic or voigtlander lens
@backfilms Actually the lens is pretty much the closest thing to a Zeiss lens in terms of build quality, and at least it had extensive weather sealing compared to the Otus series...
@No Covid Jabs He's in his 30s I guess but how is that relevant?
Literally the only video comparison of these two lenses on UA-cam. Awesome!
That's why I made it! And added the side by side tests cuz I knew people would appreciate it :)
Tamron 35mm 1.4 is the best 35mm present in the market. It has performed better than Canon, Nikon, Sigma and many others hand down. If some one is looking for a 35mm, Tamron deserves a trial.. the choice will then be obvious.
Nah 35mm L ii is the best, well for me
@@lifeofapotato4595 Except the price... If L II will costs only 200$ more, I'll say, yes, you'r right. But at this time Tamron is the exceptional fine choice in quality/price parameter and if you aren't super pro photographer, you don't need L II. By the way Tamron have a lowcost dock-station, that can solve problems with autofocusing accuracy at DSLRS at home, and Canon doesn't, only in cammera settings...
I have the tamron, and I can tell you it's a hell of a lens.
Such a solid comparison! I get asked about both these lenses all the time, I'll have to send people your way to watch this :D
Julia Trotti Thanks Julia! ☺️
Julia which one you prefer
Hello mam julia
Your video is how I found this video actually.
Haha lol, I actually came from a video of you, Julia, because I am thinking about which one is better and you made me fall in love with 35 mm :D
I just bought Tamron 35mm f1.4 in January this year and I must say that it's better than the Sigma. Tamron is sharper at f1.4 both at the centre and along the edges than Sigma at F/1.4
I Own the Tamron. 100% recommended, sharper than Canon 35mm II.
Is it? That’s awesome.
@@MitchLally Several sites that specialize in technical lens testing and comparison show the Tamron outperforming the 35 L in sharpness, CA, coma, etc. and it has smoother bokeh than the L. This makes the Tamron an amazing value at less than half the price of the Canon. Value wise, I was happy to pay an extra $200 over the Sigma (which is a very nice lens, as you have shown).
@@TheCogitech so you said to buy the tamron well I'm going to buy the tamron i don't feel like buying different brand names if i buy the tamron i want everything in tamron. So what you think about the tamron 10-24 wide angle lens.
@@MitchLally mitch let me ask you this how many lens do you really need? I want the
1. 50mm
2. 35mm
3. 85mm
4. 10-24
5. 17-55
6. 18-400
All tamron and canon
@@taquandriaadams3389 did You buy it? Tamron had a instant rebate about 3 months ago whereas the price was $100 more than their 35mm 1.8 so I jumped on it!! I didn't realize my images COULD BE THAT SHARP! I'm glad I bought mine! It makes a great lens for your Crop Sensor body and video filmmaking!
I have owned the Tamron 35mm for three years now and it has served me well. I have never had issues with sharpness. Or even blurry images because of the image stabilization. Very happy with my Tamron.
was going to settle on the 1.8 until i saw the 1.4--now do i rent that for all paid work or just buy the 1.8 and be satisifed with it as an all-rounder? decisions, decisions!
Brandon J the 1.8 model is still amazing, I absolutely loved using mine.
I really like the Tamron tbh, it renders a bit like Canon glass with that slight swirl in the bokeh 😍 Reminds me of the 85mm 1.2 and 100mm 2.8 etc. I think that’s the kind of magic you cannot add in post!
Microcontrast 🤗
Both lenses seem great. I have fought on whether to get the Tamron 35mm f/1.4 or the Sigma 40mm Art f/1.4 . I went with the Sigma . One reason was the weather sealing . I shoot live music photography and videography. Outside in high humidity I’ve had problems with my Tamron 15-30mm fogging up . I also have a couple Sigma non weathersealed lenses and never had an issue with this fogging problem. Even my best or most expensive Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 e fl vr will fog but never the Sigmas . I’m super hard on my equipment. A lot of heat to cold , cold rain to hot and muggy weather, banging and bouncing around on trucks , trailers and golf carts . The Sigmas just seem tough as nails . The Tamron has been through hell and back too but hasn’t held up like my Nikon and Sigma counterparts. After debating over the Tamron 15-30 or the Nikon 14-24 I wish I’d went with the Nikon . Now that being said this new Tamron 35mm sp f/1.4 is supposed to be the best built Tamron ever . These are my observations with my equipment, others may have a different experience. And to end this I do love the oof (bokeh) rendering with the Tamron. It’s just gorgeous!
Peace y’all
Appreciate your input and knowledge my man!
😳 Tamron 35 1.4 is weather sealed also...😳
i live in the caribean! so very helpful coment!
Man I'd really like a video of the Canon Rf35 1.8 vs Tamron 35 1.4 SP
Seconded!
Not worth it. I had both and returned the RF35. It's not even close for overall IQ. It fails mainly in the bokeh quality and CA. More nervous bokeh with lots of CA in backlit situations. I do miss the OIS for quick b roll though.
@@Chazyfizzlez There is a video out there comparing the RF35 and the EF35II and they are VERY close with the exceptions you mention (bokeh and CA).
💥 3:54 is that at 1.4 ?? The background which is quite far away seems to be in fairly good focus, more than the next image to follow.
💥 No reply??
The topic and the timing couldn't have been better !! Thank youuu
Cheers! Glad you enjoyed the video :)
So which one was sharper? I was too busy watching the ad lol
This is also an extremely good example of how a subject and photographer working together with synergy produce good photos.
Solid consistent content man and phenomenal portraits.
Thanks Ben!
I love my sigma 35mm and the 3D look I'm getting in pretty much every image. It's trully a very distinct look.
Do you have these presets at 11:25? These are amazing!
Mitch, I notice you used the Ef to rf adapter without the control ring. Do you think the ring was not necessary for when it comes to shooting?
Not necessary! Especially with the R6 now since the body has soo much custom control!
Just another great informative and entertaining video Mitch. Really appreciate all your work. Not so easy to decide which one I would choose. I even think about the Canon RF 35 f1.8
Glad you liked it. Thanks for your support!
Thank you for the comparison! When I saw that you started using Tamron lenses I was curious about the quality difference. I personally just got the Sigma 18-35.
Yeah I didnt really know which to go with - truthfully I'd be happy with either. Thanks for your comment :)
I have and have had the Sigma 18-35 since it first came out . This lens has been my bread and butter on my crop sensor nikon d500 . I absolutely love it . But it’s been a love hate relationship. Before the d500 body I really struggled with af consistency. On a mirrorless body you should have no problems. The focal lenght is super useful, the 18mm end is sublime and the most distortion free 18mm I’ve used . With a 27mm fov equivalent on Nikon it beats out most 28mm even up to the edges being distortion free. I’ve used this lens a ton for video on a SteadyCam and a gimbal . Shooting live music on large stages the people look normal in their perspective even on the edges. You got a keeper and a legend in my book .
Great video! very informative and unbiased. Love the straight RAW ( all puns intended) photos and reaction! Keep up the great work.
I came from Julia T's channel!! From the collab.. I keep going back and forth between these two and you happen to have a review. Yay. Thank you!
would you feel secure with TAMRON SP series lenses in a canon r5 and canon c70 for professional photo and video?
100% yes. Great lenses. Haven’t used the c70 yet so can’t speak on that. Just be aware the 35mm 1.4 has a compatibility issue with the IBIS.
@@MitchLally does the 45mm work on the EOSR with stabilisation?
I'm wondering about some back/front focusing issue on Sigma ART 35mm especially on Canon DSLR, do you have experiences about that?
If I did I would have mentioned it in the video :)
Hi Mitch! Thank you so much for this review! Do you know if both of these will work with the Canon RP?! Thanks!
Can either of these lenses be used in a run and gun video situation? Wasn't sure if the AF motor sound would be picked up by an on camera microphone. I'd love to save some money in sticking with some EF mounted glass, but the RF lenses are just so dang silent it's hard to not just go native.
I always use external sound. I don’t think on camera shotgun mics are a good solution for anything but scratch audio. Even in run and gun I use lapel mics for the people I’m filming. Having said that they both have some noise. Tamron is the more quiet of the two. I haven’t tested it extensively as it isn’t a massive issue for me.
@@MitchLally Yeah, it's definitely not idea. Just tough for event coverage and I'm not set up for just a single person and don't always having time to mic someone.
Hi Mitch. Nice video, congratulations. I take shots in dark gyms and was torn between the two. Which is the fastest to chase the focus of a fast subject?
Mitch, any issues with peripheral illumination correction when using the non native lenses? I've tried both the tamron and sigma on my EOS R wit the adapter and was forced to return both due to a very pronounced circular shadow in the picture. I've been sticking with native EF lenses since then but missing out on some deals because of it..
When you are shooting against the strong backlit sun like that, are you using spot metering on her face, or are you just adding a bit of compensation until it looked good? Thanks.
Neither. Full manual mode and expose by eye. Metering is less relevant with mirrorless cameras as you can see a representation of your exposure before you take the shot. Over time you learn how to expose based on how the image looks and also to make judgements based off saving highlights vs sacrificing highlights.
Mitch Lally thanks for the info, I appreciate it! 👍
Mitch, I'm wondering how heavy is this setup along with the EF adapter attached. Did you mention a weight on each or did I miss it? Thanks in advance.
Tamron: 815g
Sigma: 665g
Body with adapter: 770g
Seems that the Tamron is for you if your on a budget but still care a lot about the quality of your lens and your willing to pay more for the higher quality option. The sigma is for if your on more of a budget! Both are great options.
The price difference is around 200 dollars from 300 on the Sigma and 500 0n the Tamron.
Keep up the great videos!
Currently have the Sigma, been looking at the Tamron. I have to say the wide open performance of the Sigma has always been uninspiring to me. Not terrible, but the Tamron has a clear advantage, especially in the corners. Lately, I have had trouble using the Sigma on my R5. Every time I try to use eye AF the camera locks up. It's got to the point that I no longer bother to use it on that camera. Does anyone else have this issue? Is there a work around?
What lens do you use with your R5 that works flawlessly?
I’m OBSESSED 😍 Love the photos!!!!
Yay! Glad you liked them Liz thanks soooo much for filming!
I own Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art since 2012 amazing lens for money.
I paid £520 and now it's £620 in the UK
Bargain lens 👌 can't wait for RF version to come out
Nothing to roast dude - you're photography is amazing.
Hey man, Love the video I came here wanting a review for the Sigma 35mm to see how well it performs but now I kinda want the Tamron haha. Also though where the hell is this location it looks amazing!
Quick question Mitch, should I still get this in 2024 or is there any other alternatives u would suggest?
I commented on your video that was similar to this and I get the same vibes here. It's so chill😍 I love this style so much
Thanks man! Appreciate it.
Great Video Bruh... Wich Program do you prefer for Video ?
Editing? Davinci Resolve
Which one be the better pick ....having rf canon 28-70 f2 or having bunch of tamron prime 35 f1. 4 , 85 1.4 lens for R5 body?
Hi, I've been following your work for a long time, you're great! I now have an important question, have you tried the Tamron 85mm f 1.8 please? I am actually considering an upgrade with the Canon 85 f1.8, as I received a very good offer, does this glass work perfectly fine on the RF? are there any problems with focusing ?
I honestly don't know because I haven't used it with RF but the Tamron 85 1.4 is AMAZING.
@@MitchLally Wait tamron 85 1.4 is ?
1.8* my bad
for filmmaking do you think the sigma would still be as good? might go off your recommendation but still thought I’d ask
100% I made hundreds of videos with the Sigma 35!
Hi do you get full area coverage AF with both of this lenses on the EOS R?
Panop Sata yeah!
I want yo set up my Canon R6 with tamron 35 f1. 4... what will be the performance?
Killing it Mitch 🙌🏽 do you find the tamron nails focus more consistenly than the sigma?
Yeah I have a hunch that it does. It's hard to test though.
Much Appreciated review. Interested in both lenses and great content as always 😀
Such an underrated channel. Your stuff is awesome man. Can't stop watching your videos
Thanks Austin! I appreciate that brother
Hey there Mitch. Looks, have you faced any problems with the sigma AF? Heard awful lot. I gues because you are using the EOS R you didn't see any problems right.
No problems here.
I rarely use this focal length and rented one, in the spring, for a Senior session. I got the Sigma but the AF was WAY off and I didn't have time to fool with it so I took it back and traded it for the Tamron. Perfect AF every time!
I love your work so much Mitch!! 💛💛💛
Love your talent!! 😍🙏
Hey mitch which camera lens is the best to buy
great review! one important question: speaking of distortion; people say tamron is a bit worse. what would you say?
I didn't really look too deep into distortion. Can just correct it in post :)
@@MitchLally thank you! if you shoot video, would you take sigma then?
This was soo helpful! My camera sales guy recommended tamron over sigma and I can see why!
Bought the Tamron, all the focusing issues and needing to calibrate just scared me off. I have had NO issues with Tamron, I bought it brand new and it’s absolutely a beast
Dope bro! Love your videos !
Thanks mate!
Where did you see plastic on Tamron? :) Its metal all the way and the built q. is very, very good.
I'm torn between the Canon 35mm 1.4 L II and the Tamron.. I really like the look of the Canon lens, there's just something about it and I don't know why (maybe I'm just biased though). I have a really good deal at the moment on the canon one for 1000 bucks, as good as new. What would you do? Very informative video. New sub! :)
For 1k just get the Canon. If new prices, get the Tamron. It's truly amazing.
Would the tamron lens work with a 5d mark iv?
Tamron currently same price at B&H in USA
well i want a good camera that's full frame one that takes great pictures and video. i was told to buy this camera so i want to know a lot about this camera. i want to buy the tamron 24-70 and the tamron 35-150. you said it's only good for taking pictures and not for shooting video. well please tell me a good full frame camera please so i can check it out.
Nice comparison and shots - I'm thinking the Tamron is a bit more contrasty but not much between them. The only thing that puts me off the 1.4 is the size, most subjects will think you're pointing a telephoto at them.
ima keep it a buck as somone whos been leaning towards a sigma for a minute now, that Tamron sure did stand out in my opinon.. im impressed
I have never used a really good copy of sigma lenses I dont know why! But I always was happy with my tamrons!
Same here
Do you BBF or are you using LIVEVIEW Exclusively?
I'm using a mirrorless camera so liveview focusing is the same as viewfinder
Sigma: We have the best 35mm money can buy.
Tamron: Hold my beer!
been waiting for this review! really explained both lenses pretty well, and the photos looked great on both.. does the extra length on the tamron bother you at all?
Thanks! No it doesn't really bother me at all.
Great audio on this video man. And a really useful comparison. Picked up the Tamron. Can’t wait to really use it. Cheers!
Glad it was helpful!
Haha omg the dog that photobombed!!! Awesome photos and comparison mate
Yeah that was so funny had to leave it in :')
Hi. Thank you so much for comparative. On a 20mp 6d for me is best sigma. (I had two) Sigma produces a better and cinematic rendering and more neutral and pure color, tamron produce much more warm colors maybe too more dirty. And other apertures than 1.4 sigma may be the same or sharper, always speaking on canon 6d. but I am curious to know if these results, especially in sharpness, can change in cameras with many more megapixels since I have not been able to test this...but on 6d honestly i would stay with sigma, too. I am also curious how the new sigma dg dn compares to this tamron, too bad this new sigma can only be enjoyed at sony, they say the new sigma is better than the old one but i also have my doubts about the color it produces rendering contrast etc because not everything is sharpness. Greetings and thanks! 🙋♂️
Had 3 Sigma 35mm lenses go loose on me and I'm a bit sick of it tbh, so tomorrow I'm trying the Tamron to see if I'm going to switch. Great review though, thanks man
You can open the mount and tighten the barrel screws down and it fixes it. I've done it with 2 or 3 lenses already.
Great video been trying to determine if I should go with the 35 or 50 mm focal length and I’m leaning towards the 50 because I think 35 is a little to wide but still an overall great and in-depth video keep up the great work and stay safe
Thanks mate! 35 vs 50 is more of a personal preference I think. I know a lot of amazing photographers who just stick to 50mm!
Mitch Lally i have the 85 1.2 RF and want so much to get the 50 RF but i feel like it’s too close of a focal length between the two! So far i am using the cheap 35 1.8 macro but not sure what to do! Any thoughts ?
@@moealyasini2784 I think 50 and 85 are very different. Not a bad thing to have a 50 in the bag. The 1.2 is a crazy lens $$ wise so might be worth trying it for a while and picking between 50/85 once you have more time using it. To me 50 is nice but I prefer using 35 and 85 as my go to focal lengths - they both have really clear uses - 35 for showing some of the background and 85 for isolating the subject. The 50 is kinda in the middle it doesn't really do either of those things super well.
Mitch Lally i agree ! The 50mm is good if you only have one to choose! Since i can never live without the 85mm which is why I came to the EOS R system believe it or not haha so I might stick to the 35 1.8 till they come up with a 35 1.4 or even 1.2 haha
@@MitchLally I felt same way for very long time until I bought RF 50mm F1.2. I sold 24 70 and 70 200 and trying to stick with this one lens for a bit. Trying to be more creative. However, this 35mm F1.4 Tamron lense is so....tempting.
Just got the Tamron 35mm f1.4 today, coming from the Tamron 35mm f1.8. Can’t wait to stretch its legs! Would be interesting to compare the RF35mm f1.8 against both of these lenses.
This one is much better than the 1.8 version (I also used to own it). I am getting my hands on an RF 35 next week so stay tuned!
I might buy the Tamron 35mm- is the 1.4 much better than the 1.8?
@@MOAB-UT the f1.4 model is insane! I have hardly taken it off my R6.
@@MackPhotographyNZ Thanks so I guess you don't mind the size or lack of VR. My bottom line is IQ and it seems to do well in that dept.
@@MOAB-UT the R6 has IBIS, so solves that issue for me :) but I usually limit my exposures to 1/250 at ƒ1.4, so camera shake is a null issue.
I have the same setup!!! EOS R with Sigma 35mm art! Love your video and photography!
Thanks 💛
Would that be good or bad ?
Do I need an adapter to use these lenses on canon Rp?
Yes
Nice photos !!
I bought the Tamron as soon as it came out... what a stunning lens it is, and that opinion is obviously shared by Sigma, which within a week of the Tamron landing on the market, was offering discounts on ther own 35mm. Sadly, for me, the Tamron 35mm and a number of other of their great lenses are having compatibility issues with the Canon R5 and R6 (not the R nor the RP). I did a long session of dance photography with the 70-200mm on Thursday on my new Canon R6 and things seemed to be ok. The 35mm however lags a bit and nulifies the IS on the camera. Tamron put out a press release in July re this particular lends saying they are "working on updates" but I saw yesterday that the company put out another press release late November listing a number of other lenses. Such a pity. I have been a Tamron fan for a while and the 35mm is simply a winner, but a winner facing problems it would seem.
They just released the firmware update for the 35 and 17-35 and the lenses work now with the image stabiliser. You need to buy the dock to do a firmware update though :( or send the lens back to tamron.
Hi there is still that problem on the R6-5? and if i understood correctly with canon R it works quite right? Well thank you
I haven’t had such an issue with it on my R6, when did you buy the Tamron 35? I got mine middle of 2021. It’s sharp and fast as all get out on my R6.
Thank-you for a very helpful video, Mitch! I am about to "pull the plug" and pick up the Tamron for my portrait photography. I recently picked up the Sigma 50mm 1.4 ART used from KEH, and absolutely love it. So I know and agree with you, that Sigma is no "slouch." But everything I'm reading about the Tamron, including Matthew Saville on SLR Lounge lauds the Tamron as being bang for buck as good (or better) than Canon's EF 35mm 1.4 II. I own the EOS-R, as you utilized in this video. Your tone is upbeat and your video is fun. And I am much more "into" real world use than specs, too. So you really helped me today! I also respect Julia Trotti a ton (below) with her comment, so clearly your comparison was much needed. Mitch, all my best! Please pass along my compliments to your model, too. She is AMAZING! Great natural poses and vibrant as the sun behind her! Scott :)
What's your thoughts on the Canon 35 1.4?
Nice video. I switch over Tamron for the same problem you have with Sigma lens got it loss. I'm got it surprise for the good result for Tamron and I kept with me.
I went with the Tamron for the nice rendering and softer bokeh. I will say though that I miss the artifacts and glare when shooting into the sun. It loses some of the character without them. So I'll have to use my Sigma 50mm 1.4 for those shots
Just shooting wide open at 1.4 is all you need to know: the Tamron is nearly double the resolution, ready for the latest sensors. And then the weather proofing seals the deal. Why Sigma didn't properly dust and moisture proof the Art I'll never understand.
Nearly double? Yeah right
@@TheLinesEnd when you can see the differences on the LCD panel... You know it's significant. The difference at 1.4 between the two is STARK.
Great review, it's been said in other reviews that a calibration accessory could be another piece you need if deciding to own/purchase the sigma, my question is if the Tamron requires anything similar and or is the lens able to continue to focus without the need of such an accessory?
Ok, some knowledge...
What this almost certainly is referring to is the USB dock you can get to go with their lenses. Sigma and Tamron both make one, and it is not required for the lens to focus, it is only required for things like firmware updates, lens calibration, and certain features can be turned on/off/adjusted through it. It is useful to have, I would suggest it if you own Sigma or Tamron lenses. You would need one of each if you own both Sigma and Tamron, since they only work on their own brand. Often BnH and Adorama will include one with a lens; its a frequent deal they offer.
For the focus adjust, you only need to do this for DSLR cameras. If using a mirrorless, the on-sensor AF system is far more accurate than a DSLR, and thus does not require any kind of adjustment. Same can be said for the liveview of DSLR cameras, as they use a similar system for AF.
Anyone have any issues with error 70 on the r6 with this lens?
The Tamron lens is actually cheaper than the Sigma lens now. Can get it from Adorama for $699 brand new.
Good to know!
upscale from 1080 to 4k - real baaaaaaaaad idea
So similar. I can only tell that the Tamron's bokeh is swirlier
Who doesn't love swirly bokeh though?!
One of the sharpest lenses I’ve ever used. So much fun.
I have the Sigma 35 Art and EOS-R and was wondering how the new Tamron compares. THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO. It was really darn close! Btw, one advantage to the Sigma is that with the latest firmware update, in camera lens corrections are now workable (not on the Tamron) which is great for video. Also, the new Sigma firmware gives better AF performance and compatibility with the EOS-R.
Glad you enjoyed it - and thanks for the extra info!
Do I update my sigma on the dock for the new firmware?
@@Cartoongurlify Yes.
Good stuff bro 👍🏽👍🏽
That faster focus means everything to me.
8:12 Review
If your a pro , then image quality is the only thing that matters ,that's why you would choose the Tamron
Great Video, Thank you
Glad you enjoyed!
Great location and very pleasant music
It’s always like the perfect day in mitch lally world lol
Tamron made out of plastic? uhhhhh... no. no it's not, it's metal. Clearly the Tamron has better build quality if it has weather sealing & Sigma has quality control problems with the mount...
Yeah you're right Jaymin, it is metal on the bottom part below the focus ring - similar to the Sigma. Don't know why I said plastic in the video - my mistake.
Just updated my comments in the video with a pinned comment - so thanks for correcting me mate.
omg the puppy, that was soo cute
He was excited. It was probably his first walk in a long time 😂
Idk yet which bokeh I prefer more, Tamron or Sigma
Almost all the tests he says that Tamron performs a little better, a little faster....and then in the end he says: "if you are asking for my recommendation on which one to go for, I think Sigma is a great option". Confused.
Yeah because of the price. The sigma is still really really good!
@@MitchLally In every single choice (within reason), I go with the better lens. After a while, you'll forget about the money saved, and will have spent it on something else, but you'll never forget the other lens was a little better.
Dope bro
Thanks homie