Consent, Victim Blaming & False Accusations | Marc Angelucci
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- A new episode of "The Red Pill: Raw Files" is released every Monday at 11am PST.
If you like watching these videos, please consider becoming a Patron to support future film projects: / cassiejaye
* For at least $5/month, you will have early access to ALL upcoming episodes of The Red Pill: Raw Files.
-
The Red Pill: Raw Files consists of never-before-seen footage from the making of The Red Pill documentary.
This footage is being released for educational purposes, to inspire discussion and debate on gender issues.
Each interviewee is speaking for themselves alone and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Jaye Bird Productions or Cassie Jaye; views may also have changed since this footage was filmed.
This footage has been trimmed, but only minimally in order to create a more viewer-friendly experience. If the interview subject is seen in a favorable or unfavorable light, that is simply the viewer’s experience when listening to the speaker and is not a result of any creative or manipulative editing by Jaye Bird Productions.
Jaye Bird Productions is the copyright holder of this footage and this footage can only be used by others while in full compliance with the Fair Use doctrine, that is, explicitly alongside commentary or critique.
Jaye Bird Productions does not support or encourage harassment towards anyone and will not be held responsible for others' actions or critiques of this footage.
The release of The Red Pill: Raw Files is made possible by the supporters of Cassie Jaye's Patreon. However, Cassie Jaye maintains full creative control and authority over these videos and how they are released.
WHERE TO WATCH "THE RED PILL" MOVIE:
UA-cam: • The Red Pill
VIMEO: vimeo.com/onde...
Amazon Prime Video: amzn.to/2uCUVWa
Amazon DVD US: amzn.to/2vwaIm6 *
Amazon Blu-Ray US: amzn.to/2uCDcy0 *
Amazon DVD Canada: a.co/88bdB7f *
Amazon Blu-Ray Canada: a.co/92WKbUI *
iTunes US: apple.co/2l4MsWm
iTunes Canada: apple.co/2l0sOev
iTunes UK: apple.co/2lc4NBm
iTunes Ireland: apple.co/2jUQUTn
VUDU: www.vudu.com/mo...
GOOGLE PLAY: play.google.co...
XBOX: www.microsoft....
Also available on Hulu in select territories.
Members of a school, university, or public library can watch on Kanopy: www.kanopystre...
* All of the DVDs & Blu-Rays have Closed Captioning in English. The discs are Region 0 which means they will play on any player in the world!
www.theredpillmovie.com
Cassie Jaye on Twitter @Cassie_Jaye
The Red Pill on Facebook: / redpillmovie
Cassie Jaye's on Patreon: / cassiejaye
Make a one-time donation to Cassie Jaye via PayPal: bit.ly/2wcWVoA
A 22 year old I dated accused me of assaulting her 2 weeks earlier just so that she would have the moral high ground in an argument we were having. I walked away as soon as she used that tactic, and despite her attempts to contact me I've ignored her since. That is crazy bullshit that I just don't need
ZSaSzquatch was falsely accused 4 times or so by my semi long term ex w really severe bpd... really sucks when ur getting hit all the time too... my friends were really scared for me and so were my parents... I’m happy I’m outta there its scary what can go down as a guy in the modern environment
*i was
Somethings in the Water as soon as she shows Borderline symptoms dump her
Amazing Talk but We Keep Talking about this for 30 Years now and Nothing Has Changed ! Same Crap Misandry Laws !
Sex is not something men "do to" women.
Yes and no. It depends on what dynamic we're speaking about.
Yes! And as both a feminist (not crazy rad fem) and an MRA, saying so not only makes men into inhuman animals with only one job, but it also takes away women’s agency
False accusers should be punshed as though they had committed the crime they accused the other person of doing. So if they accuse someone of committing first degree rape, then they should be sentenced equally.
Yes. It's the same idea as the US American 2nd amendment. You're allowed to carry because you have the right to defend yourself. This works as a deterrent for criminals who shoot at you because you can shoot them as well.
Likewise, punishing false rape accusations as if they were rape works as the same deterrent.
And perhaps now you know why it's so hard to work this into the legal system. It's hard enough to keep the 2nd amendment alive. Adding a new, similar law just like it will obviously face a lot of resistance from many people.
The only problem is that rape cannot be easily proven. So women who were raped and reported the rape could be punished leading to more silence.
@@emilyvillamil An accusation that has not been proven true or false would not be punished. If the evidence proves the accusation is true, then the rapist would be punished, and if the accusation were proven false, then the accuser would be punished. This should be true for all crimes.
A simple example of an accusation that is proven false would be a solid alibi for the accused.
@@litigioussociety4249 What if the accused pay people to have an alibi or have powerful connections? Then what do we do? We have to think of all the possibilities here.
@@emilyvillamil The same argument could be made of a plantif against a defendant. The issue is the evidence, and a court having an objective means of establishing justice. Most people desire a justice system that favors mercy over judgment, which means a person should be innocent until a solid case can be established against them. We don't have that either, since a person is often held in prison during the trial process, despite having not yet been convicted.
You seem to favor a system that punishes people on flimsy evidence in an attempt to proactively protect others, rather than protect the accused (prosecuting potential for future crimes.)
The only way to insure people don't make false accusations is to punish them.
I wonder how many feminists would agree that falsely accused men are victims too?
OmegaTou Several years ago I heard a feminist on a radio show deny that there was such a thing as a false rape accusation. She actually claimed that this is just something that no woman would do. As for other feminists, they seem to have the "If you want to make an omelet you have to break a few eggs" attitude when it comes to false rape accusations. In other words if a few innocent men have to get sacrificed at the altar to benefit "The Sisterhood" then so be it.
Natufian Grain Harvest
Men laying down their lives for the benefit of women... why does that sound so familiar? Oh right, all of human history.
@@FreshwaterSquid77 my ex was one of thoses...
As a feminist and MRA (NOT a radical feminist, remember that those are the people we are really talking about. Crazy shits) I think that men who are falsely accused are absolutely victims.
@@jaznappier7992 How can you be both a feminist and an MRA if every major mainstream feminist organization is opposed to equality for men and boys?
Ironically, some of the radfems (like Big Red) actually have more in common with MRAs than mainstream feminists like the National Organization for Women (NOW). If we take child custody as an example, Big Red has argued that believing that women are better caregivers and therefore should get primary custody, as put forward by the current "primary care standard", is part of patriarchy and should be undone. MRAs argue that this idea is part of gynocentrism and a failure to acknowledge men's role in childrearing. They have different rationales but want this standard changed in order for men to have an increased likelihood of custody. Conversely, the NOW has consistently upheld the "primary care standard" and opposed laws designed to grant men more likelihood of custody.
Who's side are you on?
They will not get a jury to convict a woman of false allegations. Convicting a man with minimal evidence however is a different matter.
"The falsely accused are Real Victims too"
Sing it, fucking loud!
Leave it to an MRA to speak clearly and make perfect sense.
Respects for Marc Angelucci.
Thank you for all the work you've done for the MRM
Rest in Peace.
? He died?
@@lukehunnable he was shot at his house.
@@Redtecho Oh... that's terrible. How sad...
I would never teach my daughter feminist principles in regards to rape and sex because I genuinely believe having those kinds of beliefs encourages rape and regrettable experiences.
If taking care of my daughter and teaching her to take responsibility for herself means I hate women, I can honestly say that I could live with that.
How does it encourage rape?
Feminism is all about respect. For instance right equality is just respect.
Someone promoting women's right over men's is not a feminist but a matriarchist. It is just as toxic as patriarchism, witch by the way encourages rape way more than any other ideology, while feminism do not.
Then if she does get raped, she’ll feel like she won’t be able to come to you because you’ll shut her down. Great parenting.
@@DrunkLuna OP never said that being raped would be her fault though. Only to take the necessary steps to protect herself from bad people rather than waiting for those bad people to stop existing (which is never gonna happen). That's my understanding of the original comment at least.
I don't like sharing the amount of sexual partners I've had but I'll say it's a substantial amount and I'm only saying this because of what comes next. Every women I've slept with that said no or pretended they didn't want it asked me why I stopped when I stopped then told me I was supposed to keep going. Non verbal communication is much more important in sex.
Besides, the best way to ruin the mood for women is to ignore the queues and ask "do you want to have sex?"
It's very simply a matter of Communication and Intimacy, which comes with Trust. If either of the partners are horny and there is the potential, then communicate this. If he or she isn't in the mood, then there shouldn't be guilt or reluctance. It should be a clear and loving no. I've asked my GF if she was sure about this, that, or something else. If she says, "No," to certain ones I ask again and make sure. If it's no but playful, then I do things that she's indicated that she likes. It all should be natural. Folks shouldn't get with partners who are about these Games!
It's no longer safe to be "playful" in this age of rape hysteria. It's far too dangerous for men these days. Once the word "no" comes out of her mouth, you stop, for _your own_ protection, even if you know she didn't really mean it. I would even venture to say you should be wary of starting up again even if she specifically says "yes, fuck me" after that.
If she's going to play games like that, bring out your phone and start recording everything. If she won't allow that, then call it a day.
You are absolutely correct. Ask the question. Get an absolute YES on camera or voice recording, or they can wreck your life with no consequence to themselves even when THEY are caught lying about it to a police officer.
DRHJR DRHJR
DRHJR DRHJR
1 second ago
You are absolutely correct. Ask the question. Get an absolute YES on camera or voice recording, or they can wreck your life with no consequence to themselves even when THEY are caught lying about it to a police officer.
It's not victim blaming to expect some personal accountability. I'm not saying you need to defend yourself in every possibly way but let's say you're in a shady part of town. Are you going to leave your doors unlocked, keys in the ignition?
Would you also suggest not trying to look into the magic rock you got from a rogue servant of the Dark Lord?
@@userequaltoNull savage
RIP Marc Angelucci (1968 - 2020).
You will be missed
I discovered him and his work because of the fact he was killed, I hope the killing is not somewhat related to his work for men’s right
@@claudiomaniero645 his wikipedia page says the perp was involved in his work. It was apparently a targeted hit. Sad.
Roy Den Hollander was the one who killed Marc
@@NotoriousGirl33, thanks. I wish he had made it to Court or at least explained his motive. I miss Marc but feel his presence.
@@christopherfield1748 yeah it sucks because he seemed quite progressive and egalitarian with his views. As an egalitarian, I would’ve loved to have had a discussion with him. What’s also ironic about his death is, Roy Den Hollander was a MGTOW.
Hi Cassie, my name is Lisa and I follow your channel. I recently came across a story of a fine man who's life was ruined because of some false allegations of sexual assault and abuse. He was recently showcased on Karen Straughans channel and touched many people, myself included. His property was seized because of these false allegations and now it's up to him to fight for what is already his. I told him i would reach out to you to see if you can interview him to help his cause . This will be a very interesting cause for you to talk about as well as for him to maybe get some justice. His you tube channel is Bronz Huntington but his story in long format will be in Karen Straughans channel from a few months ago. Please see if you can help him get some notice and support. Thank You so much!
Nothing rare at all. 90% of moms accuse the father of some weird shit he did with the kid's. It's quite normal. Also, us men/fathers love tremendously and i was broken in pieces when my ex was allowed to kidnap mine through feminist laws. It also broke my children and this has lasted their entire lives. Not until she was strung out on drugs 17yrs later did the court even think of giving me my babies. My story is 1 of MILLIONS going on as we speak. I hear no females speaking against this evil abuse of fathers and children and you better believe it's ruined my life and my childrens childhood. We are forever changed from these unjust laws and female nature.
Thank you for making this film. I consider myself a men's rights activist, but go it alone, and am now a 48 year old junior, legal studies major, intending to affect legislation to change the way family law works. Thank you for doing this film.
Believe women! They won't ever lie for women are amazing, I love women, I'm definitely not overcompensating, screw the lying man for women can't biologically lie! I'm not a creepy male feminist I swear (sarcasm)
Having been falsely accused myself, my lawyer proved beyond a shadow of a doubt my innocence, I went through 6 months of hell and back and was looking 10 years in the face. My ex was 100% guilty of her crime and walked away without even receiving a slap on the wrist, and she laughed. Women must be sent to prison "the same amount of years" her false accusations would have sent the innocent man.
R.i.p Marc!!
To be honest, Cassie was completely right to cut this out of the final film. Angelucci did not prepare well for this interview. As a lawyer, he should not be musing about cases where he doesn't know the evidence or information clearly (Denim Italian Case) and he should make a clear and cogent argument by citing to exact legislation or verdicts. As a lawyer, if someone were going to interview me about clients or issues that I am facing in my field, which is maligned by the general public AND it was going to be in a documentary, I would get my ducks in a row.
You are right although before talking about it he mention he didn't do any research about it, I did it personally because I was pretty outraged of this and wanted to read what the Jury wrote so I read the motivation of the sentence and it ended up a bit different than how it was reported in by the media, I don't know if that make it more grotesque or what but was actually the prosecutor to first bring the "too tight jeans" reasons to prove there was no consent by her, claiming the jeans were only partially removed because was impossible to remove them without consent then on appeal the defendant used this same concept against her accusation.
I wasn't able to access all the trial documentation yet but I hope I will, I'm not saying he was innocent but I like to know if, how and what gone wrong during the trial. There are instead other cases were the media (along feminist and actually most of the people) blamed the Jury but when you read the motivation of the sentence their decision actually makes fully sense
I look at this three years later. The crazies have been disproven over and over in almost everything but society still marches ahead to their beat. The world has gone mad.
R.I.P to a good man
it's a bit of a double standard when rape is only forced Penetration and not insertion
Might wanna rephrase that, penetration and insertion mean the same thing in this context.
Jakk Frost a woman forces insertion of the male bits
is that more accurate?
Maybe the word 'envelopment' might be more useful to use.
The legal term is "made to penetrate", which is really kind of clumsy wording, but there you have it.
Came here to leave the most modest of tributes to this man, who fought for us, when we have been abused and neglected too. We stand with abused people, everywhere.
Both men and women can be abused.
We will continue Marc. Your work and your intent, will continue.
Rest in peace, sir.
The Depp/Heard false assault accusation is a great example of why due process is so important and underlines the fact that false accusers face little repercussion
Video popular again in the wake of this man's mysterious murder. I hope we will discover what happened.
Wake up!
He was murdered by Roy Den Hollander
It hurts me reading what happend, and I didn't even know Marc. With your documentary you are carrying on part of his legacy!
"There needs to be an open intelligent dialogue." What planet is this guy from? Look around. Men take care: no unprofessional contact = (almost) no chance of becoming a target. Think about your long term future - study the stats.
Anyone who makes a false accusation like this should be prosecuted.
Sometimes the punishment is the prosecution itself. Makes it worth it.
Oh also, on the idea of prosecuting false accusations... I think it should work something like this:
Potentially falsely accused rape cases where there is an assertion with absolutely zero corroborating evidence: If the case gets thrown out, and there is no judgement... If mental health professionals believe the story may have been true based on psychological factors, any therapy that alleged victim needs should be handled, not necessarily sure what the best way to pay for it would be, possibly tax subsidized, but that would be fair, I think.
Potentially falsely accused rape cases where there was evidence, but it did not meet burden of proof, same thing mostly, but the case should be open to appeal for free, even superceding double-jeopardy in cases where new evidence comes forth that proves the accusation beyond any doubt.
Falsely accused rape cases where the only evidence presented was planted, and the case looks like it was not a mistake, but rather intentional attempted character assassination on the other hand should carry EXTREMELY steep penalties, such as mandatory minimums (such as 4+ years)
This popped in my feed a week after this guy was murdered....
Trying to educate the media on anything is like trying to teach a pig to dance. All your going to do is p*## off the pig. There is very little in the way of "journalism" these days.
I was sent to prison because my x-wife didn't get her way. She wanted me to go to Chicago and get her daughter which I refused. It's called Lindberg law. I went to jail 5 times because she said I hit her which is hard to do since I was at work and I proved it but the police didn't care. She turned into a crazy lady and it was worst and so I left went to another city and she kept it up even with me in a different town. The Cop in charge of her case was threatening her saying he takes her son away if she didn't convict me. She lied and it was FALSE ACCUSATION of Rape comes into play. She had a new BoyFriend who was a Druggy and supplying her with Crack cocaine. Now my life is better but I 'm still SUEING the county for False arrest, False imprisonment, Slander, and loss of jobs and she didn't care she had to move to another state North Carolina.
So watch out for women who wear Sheeps clothing!!!!!
Facebook knows 50 ways you're gonna leave your lover before you even know 1.
Very sad to know that Marc was shot dead at the front door of his house.....probably where this was filmed.
😞
Is punishment for a crime a deterrent for that crime? If so, then punishing false accusers is necessary. Better 1000 rapists go free, than 1 innocent person killed or imprisoned for nothing.
Nothing turns on a woman more than asking for permission every step of the way.
From my research and experience, I think about 1 in 20, 5% of all men convicted of sexual assault are innocent. Say I'm wrong, say it's only 0.5%. That is 5 men in every 1000 who are convicted of rape. If you accept that, now think about one of those 5 being your brother or son or father or your friend. Does the percentage determine the importance of the issue?
Perjury is am offense regardless of the crime, you don't see people afraid of perjuring themselves in any other type of criminal case when they are being honest why would this be any different?
Perjury isn't necessarily the same thing as making a false accusation. Perjury happens in a court room and false accusations usually happen earlier in the process while talking with law enforcement. For most crimes other than rape there is a real chance of being prosecuted if you accuse somebody of crime you know they didn't commit.
Perjury is a false statement made while under oath to tell the truth in court.
Most times there are no witnesses and a partner can say yes then sue you anyway. It is good to ask each time, but it doesn't cover anyone from being false accused, so what do we need to do ? Filming us giving consent with a paper journal of the day in foreground ? Even so, how proving a false accusation for an imaginary intercourse the following day ? If two persons were together in a private place there's no way we can prove something didn't happen, the absence of proof isn't the proof of the absence and it will lay to the credibility of the accusation against the one of the accused, which (for heterosexual relations) tends to give more credibility to the accusation just if it's a woman suing a man.
Sexual predators have to be stopped and punished, innocents don't. Some decades ago police often did a bad job not hearing properly victims, now this problem is a bit more limited but false accusations tend to explode, law has to keep this in mind and invent new protocols to keep protecting victims but also prevent innocent condemnation.
I would much rather be raped once than falsely accused, defamed, convicted, registered as a sex offender, and raped repeatedly in prison - which is what happens to sex offenders. Last time I checked more men are raped in prison than women in our entire society, often repeatedly, and they get zero help or sympathy. The only rebuttal I ever hear about this is victim-blaming them for being in prison in the first place.
Key points about rape and victim blaming:
1) an unfounded accusation is not necessarily a false accusation. Rape has a mental element on the part of the alleged rapist and it’s entirely possible that, while the complainant did not consent, the alleged rapist genuinely did not realise this (e.g. if she went along with sex because she didn’t feel comfortable saying no even though he did nothing to cause that discomfort).
2) there is a key difference between victim blaming and pragmatic self-protection advice which is often ignored. Getting drunk at a party does not make it morally OK to rape you, but the reality is that there are nasty people out there and the authorities won’t always be there when you need them. It’s the same reason why I don’t leave all my doors and windows open when I go on holiday.
3) some people really do cross that line and blame the victim. It’s particularly heinous when rape victims experience it because of how serious that crime is. But this happens in all sorts of cases, not just rape. E.g. when I was younger and my friends and I got beaten up for being goths we were told by police that it was our fault for choosing to dress that way. So as bad as it is, it’s not because of “rape culture”.
4) acknowledging these points rather than swallowing the feminist ideological narrative wholesale does not mean you take the crime of rape any less seriously.
Restoring my faith in equality
Isn't it also just good practise to gather as much information as possible, so that if correlation does occur you can curtail those behaviours to improve an individual's safety?
To say, don't drink so much that you pass out isn't victim blaming, sure that may be entirely their own fault, but that doesn't excuse rape, or mean it should be expected. However, we need to still be allowed to have the conversation. To say, "don't drink too much, not only is it dangerous, but when you are unconscious your body is entirely at the whim of others". That's not condoning rape, that's just an objective fact, and saying don't do something that might lead to rape is obviously showing a desire for the rape not to occur.
Funny how we all knew what consent was until about 5 yrs ago .
Regarding Katherine Spillar interview. I cannot find any defense posed by Katherine Spillar, her extended interview was so lacking in logic and consistency I was sure I would find a rebuttal. I thought surely she would claim she was taken out of context. Has she offered any defense for her obvious sexism? I posted here looking for current information.
Me too. I was looking to see if any of the crazy things the feminists in the movie said would be defended.
Some random woman accused me of touching her to a bouncer and they kicked me out. Never talked to her, she appeared to look like a rich entitled type based on how she dressed and the bar it was at. I think certain ones just power trip over seeing what they can do to guys.
It’s too bad he was murdered. He seems the more rational and reasonable of the MRAs
Cassie, I know your opinions have changed, but didn't you do a lot of interviewing of both sides when making that film? I haven't seen any raw video from the other side interviews. It might be interesting to see the full, unedited thoughts of the other side, at least for educational purposes.
She has posted some of those too. Just look up The Red Pill Katherine Spillar (I think that's how you spell her name.:) It's title is: Do Feminists Think Men are Disposable?
Michael Messner, Michael Kimmel, Big Red, Katherine Spillar and others have been uploaded to the Raw Footage Files. Some more than once. It's interesting to me that the feminist uploads tend to have the largest view counts.
I don't know. Going back and checking the view counts I see I may have misspoken. Big Red, Katherine Spillar and the guys who were protesting the MRA meeting near the beginning of the film have much larger than average view counts. But Kimmel and Messner's counts are about average. The largest view count I saw belongs to MRA Karen Straughan. Why some videos create more interest than others I couldn't tell you.
My understanding was it is documentary focusing on the MRMs . Which is why it is contentious. Speaking to 'the enemy' . who turn out to be reasonable informed people with valid concerns. Feminists have ample voices in the public domain. MRAs don't.
Unless there is a way to determine someone had been raped for sure, there should be no charges for false rape allegations. People can easily write off a real report of a rape as a false accusation leading to silence. A rapist's dream.
The Denim Day issue was that a rape conviction was overturned on the assertion that because the victim was wearing very tight jeans, it wouldn't be possible for the assailant to remove them without her assistance (and therefore consent). That assertion being made by the Italian Supreme Court, in 1998. The ruling was overturned in 2008.
No clue whether they guy was actually guilty, but that is definitely a BS reason to reverse a conviction.
True but I've read the motivation of the sentence and it's a bit different that how it was reported by the media, I don't know if that make it more grotesque or what but was actually the accuse to first bring the "too tight jeans" reasons to prove there was no consent claiming the jeans were only partially removed because was impossible to remove them without consent.
Sadly I wasn't able to have access to all the trial documentation yet but I hope I will
The weird bit to me is what Cassie says about victim blaming at 6:45 minutes in:
What was she wearing,
What did she tweet,
What was she thinking drinking that much, She's underage!
I raised my daughter to take care of her self, take care with who she is friends with, where she goes, how much she drinks etc. She is free because she is responsible in a flawed world where bad things can happen. Making women passive victims does not help. Any predator needs prosecuting of course. There is no excuse for actual rape, ever. I wanted to raise my daughter where that is least likely to happen.
Yeah, the extreme explicit-verbal-consent-needed to have sex idea is just going too far.
That example with the girl and the jocks does sound like rape.
And "rape culture" as a term is just disingenuous, insidious and dangerous.
If we apply the same standard Feminists want to apply to consent, to determine rape, instead of a biased and slanted standard, then a clear and decisive "no" must be expressed before it is rape. Which is clearly unfair to impaired rape victims.
I only expressed this to expose the ridiculousness of the Feminist position. It ignores that in real life there are grey areas where the responsibility and tacit consent is unclear. As far as Feminists are concerned it is all men's fault no matter what happens and no matter whether non-verbal consent is given or not. When the KKK says, "states rights" it is coded language for "the right to own another human being" and people quickly point that out, but when Feminists use, "patriarchy" as a coded language for "Men" nobody holds them accountable for their bigotry.
So no matter how deep you are into the sexual encounter, including group sex, if any individual says NO all activity must immediately stop, OR each individual, who did Not said NO, is/are rapists.
If the guy is a 10/10, it's not rape, but if the guy is a 5/10 then it is. Its totally Insanity. Even if she says YES she can later retract and twist her story to suit the narrative. Man bad, woman good!!
When you leave your car unlocked and a bad person steals it, you've earned blame. When you get stabbed or shot in Harlem for wearing a racist shirt, you've earned blame. When you don't wear your seatbelt and get injured in an accident, you've earned blame whether or not the accident was your fault. When you get blackout drunk at a party and bad things happen, you've earned blame.
Bad people will do bad things, and sometimes bad things just happen; not protecting yourself earns you some blame, regardless of the situation. And putting yourself INTO bad situations does not absolve you of some responsibility.
Introducing Marc the angel-lucci fighting injustices in our society.
Both Harry Crouch and Marc angelucci are so close to finishing up an actual fully stacked law firm to help men with complex legal cases amongst other things,
that’s what I call serious activism.
All they need is a bit more funding so please send a few bucks over to the National coalition for men and become a member it’ll barely cost you and it’s easy to do on their site.
National coalition for men
This somehow felt very topical in regards to the recent deadly Humboldt Broncos bus crash in Saskatchewan a few days ago. Today I was listening to a talk radio program that was discussing this topic, and a caller called in saying that while it was tragic, they were privileged white boys that died and that this crash is overshadowing the even more recent bus crash in India that killed a whole bunch of children, which in her mind was not a good thing.
The host then made a good point (after a break, so he mulled it over for a bit) saying that we shouldn't pit victims against each other, and claiming that one crash is less tragic than another is a very bad and divisive way of talking about tragedies, which is along the lines of what was being discussed here (both rape victims and victims of a false accusation are both still victims and should be treated as such).
This really has me pondering how we treat victims, and if there is any real reason why victims should be treated differently. I'm still hung on the difference between a well-known person being murdered (e.g. pop star, president) and any nondescript civilian being murdered, as I don't think there's a way to treat these hypothetical deaths the same, even though they are both tragic. Maybe it's how easy it is to relate to a given tragedy that makes some appear bigger than others.
There actually is no controversy--we already have a fully tested and stringent Consent criteria established in the Canadian Criminal Code. The problem is these academic definitions of Consent which are pretty much fairy tale theories.
We love Cassie
a war always has combat and civil roles both need to be filled if it is on the battlefield or in hospitals, factorys, ... both need more staff at war so draft should always be both genders in both roles ... the male-female differences (like less strengh) will ensure that most women will not need go to combat and there are absolute pacifists who wont touch a gun even at gu point in both genders so a rule only man will not be needed in the situations that totally need a draft all the people of this agegroup should go to war and the fittest of them to combat the rest to support the critically needed support fields like ammunition, hospitals, medical supplys... and draft should be the last resort, not to be used until the fight gets very close to the country .... germany should not draft again until there is battles on EU ground
We also need to stop shaming women for having an appetite for sexual activity. That would help so much.
Every single man needs to join the national coalition for men its easy to become an official member just sign up on their website.
I'm thinking that I am going to make any woman I have an physical relationship with sign a consent form in front of witnesses. That will keep them away. The dangerous ones most of all, most likely all of them but I will be protected. LOL this crap is getting out of control. Everyone needs to stand up for themselves. Do the right thing and be honorable. Most of all there needs to be punishment for false accusers. I don't know what but something needs to be done.
LOL no winning for losing.
I am so glad that my husband respects me when I say no and I do the same with him. It is really a two way street.
Thank you !!!!
Well done to that man for his self-control
3rd!
Life is so much easier as a Monk
We need to make this more popular :D
Humans communicate in many ways. verbally, body language and the clothes you are wearing. Yes, what clothes you wear is a form of communication as to what kind of person you are and what your intentions might be. For example. I wear a suit. that tells you something. I wear a track suit... different. I wear a thong. yeah... you know what I'm communicating then. So what clothes you are wearing, is relevent when talking about rape. Because it's asking what you were communicating in an attempt to establish some form of context.
I was 16 girl 21 or 24 and she had a baby paid for that for 19 years.
Wow 0 dislikes 😭😭😭😍😍
RIP King
For most of it he's just talking about telling the full story of a rape incident. That may be more damning for the perpetrators or it might give understanding as to why the perpetrator thought it was okay to cross the line. And it's not necessarily that "she was asking for it", but maybe she was giving a lot of implied consent by her words and behavior before she passed out.
My other big takeaway from a lot of these rape/consent stories is the common thread of alcohol. If you don't want to be accused of rape or be raped, make sure you're not drinking and you're not around people who are drinking. It's dangerous to lose control of your decision-making or be around people who are out of control. You might hurt someone or be so inebriated that something happens to you. I think college-aged men need to think long and hard about whether to include drinking as part of their college experience.
To me it's like this. I've been on a night out. It's 2am and I'm walking home alone. I have a stack of £50 notes that I'm waving around as I walk. Why shouldn't I? It's my right to wave MY money around! Sure there's a small criminal element in society that may want to rob me, I could have left it in my pocket or taken a taxi to minimize potential risk. But I should be able to do whatever I want in public without facing repercussions of any sort.
This is the point: it doesn't mitigate the crime, it isn't a factor in the process, but it still make you an idiot if something happen because you could have make sure it couldn't happen.
'and the boys raped her'
Well... I mean the way you said that you're implying that they had sex with her. This did not happen. It was fingers only as I recall. Still bad. But, if we're honest, it's hardly what comes to mind when people say rape.
Rape doesn't have to be with a penis. Rape can be done with fingers or an object.
I think people who are convicted of making false accusations should serve the maximum possible sentence associated with the crime they were accusing their victim of plus five years. All false accusers can rot away for all I care.