India's Vikrant vs China's Fujian: Why Made-in-India aircraft carrier outshines Beijing's warship

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 сер 2022
  • The Navies of India and China have received their new aircraft carriers in recent weeks. Beijing on June 17 launched its newest and most advanced aircraft carrier 'Fujian'. The 80,000 tonnes warship is equipped with an electromagnetic aircraft launch system. Only U.S's nuclear-powered Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is equipped with such advanced technology. However, Fujian is a conventional warship and experts warn that China may not be able to fully use the potential of EMALS technology. India on the other hand uses tried and tested STOBAR system on Vikrant. Watch this video to know more.
    #india #china #vikrant #fujian #ussgeraldford #aricraftcarrier #indiannavy #planavy #modi #xijinping

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @KailyYang
    @KailyYang Місяць тому +28

    In China, there is a saying that goes: "There is a way to describe a level of situation, which is mild, moderate, high, extreme, and India." India is the highest level. So I think everything in India is No.1

    • @cheeseongho5494
      @cheeseongho5494 Місяць тому +2

      😂😂😂😂

    • @jiaao86
      @jiaao86 24 дні тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @ld7709
      @ld7709 7 днів тому

      轻度,中度,高度,极度,印度。😂😂😂

  • @getgaijoobed6219
    @getgaijoobed6219 Рік тому +44

    Lmao listen I ain’t Indian nor Chinese but for those of you genuinely interested in naval technology, this video is borderline Indian propaganda. Vikrant still uses STOBAR (Ski-Jump) technology while Fujian uses CATOBAR (meaning that generally, Vikrant’s aircraft won’t be able to carry as heavy a load because of the lack of a catapult), not to mention the fact that the Fujian displaces much more than Vikrant, meaning it has more room for its air wing as well as supplies, fuel, etc. There is simply no comparing a 45000 tonne STOBAR carrier with an 85000 tonne CATOBAR carrier. You can’t simply claim that Vikrant is better because of its supposedly tried and true ski jump. Otherwise, wouldn’t the US Navy still be using STOBAR carriers?

    • @paulzhang1310
      @paulzhang1310 Рік тому +6

      China Launches EMALS-Capable Carrier Fujian

    • @ivanwolf5610
      @ivanwolf5610 10 днів тому +1

      Why spoil fun of Indians?

    • @AlvinYap510
      @AlvinYap510 8 днів тому +1

      Your first encounter with Indians? lol

  • @meth8848
    @meth8848 Рік тому +90

    This video is :-
    90% Speculation.
    7% Conjecture.
    3% Fact. And I take the three percent with a very big grain of salt

    • @siddeshmestry498
      @siddeshmestry498 Рік тому +1

      I don't think u take salt 😂

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +10

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @Rahul_Singh100
      @Rahul_Singh100 Рік тому +5

      Lol. You say that because you are jealous of truth. Indian Carrier is indigenously built and the most advanced in Asia. China knows nothing about Quality. They only make copies. India makes Quality and total indigenous

    • @arkapravaroy1061
      @arkapravaroy1061 Рік тому

      @@46_shivangipandey96 you are just a donkey with white face....you don't know the quality of aircraft carrier...with such mixed features , although foreign, gives edge on other carriers....This ship is a ToT feature...

    • @RobertDeeWiroAAnjum
      @RobertDeeWiroAAnjum Рік тому +14

      @@Rahul_Singh100 lol total indigenous? 70% of vikrant part got import from other countries… Fujian is the only 100% indigenous aircraft carrier

  • @taxvisor261
    @taxvisor261 Рік тому +491

    "Nothing much is known about China's Fujian.." Kudos to that country's capacity to keep secrets... thanks to Indian media for revealing all secrets and capabilities around Vikrant..

    • @iscifion7122
      @iscifion7122 Рік тому +95

      Lmao No.
      No confidential info is revealed.

    • @loktom4068
      @loktom4068 Рік тому

      Sources said the Chinese re electro magnetic catapult can launch 3 planes to air vs the outdated best of US steam catapults launch only 1 for the same amount of time.
      This media and Mrs. Porky's mouth WION FAILED to mention.
      Also there's a fire on board with the INDIA CARRIER during sea trial worthiness test failed to mention by the same Modi group medias.
      Hiding important real informations is not good for the fake freedom of the press.

    • @Yuyuyufucgicic
      @Yuyuyufucgicic Рік тому +13

      But they just said what all can see, SKI Jump Ramp, apart from that nothing else. 🤣🤣

    • @AB_NOI7
      @AB_NOI7 Рік тому +15

      Some details are selectively revealed to the media. Propaganda also has its own importance.

    • @jesusofnazareth3507
      @jesusofnazareth3507 Рік тому +31

      I feel bad for those Indiann sailors who will be sunk in couple minutes in a confrontation with China.

  • @biggwong6912
    @biggwong6912 Рік тому +27

    India should compare to Bangalesh first.
    GDP per capita 2021 by Worldbank.
    India.....$2,100
    Bangladesh.... $2,500

  • @lightberry1197
    @lightberry1197 Рік тому +15

    Because India is always 10 times better than China, 5 times better than the west, India is the best

    • @altezza82
      @altezza82 15 днів тому

      India is cleaner than china... 😂

  • @Suffer-grow
    @Suffer-grow Рік тому +16

    It’s like comparing tuk tuk with mercedes.

  • @sdfssdfsdfsdf
    @sdfssdfsdfsdf Рік тому +33

    It is a different dimension. One is 100% made in China, the other is 80% made in overseas.

    • @BLT695
      @BLT695 Рік тому +11

      No, the parts and radars on Fujian are made in India. Trust me, Vikrant is number one in Asia.

    • @jimher357
      @jimher357 Рік тому +6

      @@BLT695 🤣

    • @CaiLeTao
      @CaiLeTao 2 місяці тому +2

      @@BLT695 义演战忽

    • @Av0nKraD
      @Av0nKraD Місяць тому

      @@BLT6956

    • @user-qp1zn8su5e
      @user-qp1zn8su5e Місяць тому

      啊对对对​@@BLT695

  • @persistenthustle
    @persistenthustle Рік тому +15

    Indian military is #1 if wars are fought with PowerPoint slides

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @godzillamothra5983
    @godzillamothra5983 Рік тому +24

    Sorry, but Asia two most powerful nations are China and Japan, India is probably not even third, that title should belong to South Korea. India is probably at 4th or 5th

    • @djibicisse
      @djibicisse Місяць тому

      Japan and korea has slowed down a lot

  • @jaskaransinghmann9360
    @jaskaransinghmann9360 Рік тому +378

    Quantity is in itself a quality. China's rate of warship production definitely gives it an edge over the India. Fujian has more fighters and capability to launch heavy aircraft like awacs. We cannot simply overlook that thing.

  • @janardhananvaliaveettil791
    @janardhananvaliaveettil791 Рік тому +45

    China's Fujian is the largest air craft carrier ever build outside USA.Its displacement capacity is nearly 100000 ton and can carry 40 air crafts and having the capability of electromagnetic catapult.

    • @amit.D_K
      @amit.D_K Рік тому +1

      2-3 brahmos is enough to distroye it 😎

    • @janardhananvaliaveettil791
      @janardhananvaliaveettil791 Рік тому +28

      @@amit.D_K In missile technology also China is number one in the world.Brahmos is nothing before their new hypersonic missile.Hypersonic missiles were tested successfully only by Russia and China so far,not even USA.

    • @amit.D_K
      @amit.D_K Рік тому +2

      @@janardhananvaliaveettil791 you seems highly insecure living in india ,i advice you to migrate to china as their hypersonic missile will always protect you 😎 , india is capable to develop hypersonic missile technology till next year, already 70 percent technology has been developed by india .

    • @janardhananvaliaveettil791
      @janardhananvaliaveettil791 Рік тому +1

      @@amit.D_K I am telling the present day reality of China's unchallenged superiority over India in military powers,not like your hollow jargon.I have no doubt India will acquire the hypersonic technology later.Don't be panic when hearing truth. Furthermore,I am ready to migrate to China,if you are capable of arrange a resident Chinese visa for me.

    • @amit.D_K
      @amit.D_K Рік тому +1

      @@janardhananvaliaveettil791 if you are feeling insecure then it's your job to get the Chinese visa ,not mine , 😎 i am also talking about present,

  • @maximme
    @maximme Рік тому +20

    I love indian aircraft carrier.
    Its so clean and devoid of planes.
    Just an empty deck and so windy.

    • @jareenanona4825
      @jareenanona4825 3 місяці тому

      World best fijian aircraft careear 💪💪💪🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

    • @huangzb8060
      @huangzb8060 Місяць тому

      It is now the largest open floating platform for open defecation.

  • @theliansin6516
    @theliansin6516 5 місяців тому +6

    China has so many surprises... and yet they are humble...

  • @shabotages
    @shabotages Рік тому +41

    If you check a little bit harder you'll find some made in china inside Vikrant lol
    So basically it's made in china 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @69cents48
      @69cents48 Рік тому +9

      check whether you dad is not made in china 🤣🤣🦇🦇

    • @kingmaker6197
      @kingmaker6197 Рік тому +2

      👌Exactly😂

    • @shabotages
      @shabotages Рік тому +9

      @@69cents48 hahaha 1 Indian mad because he can't accept the fact there are some componentss that made in China. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @69cents48
      @69cents48 Рік тому

      @@shabotages just one stupid barking thinking that China does all this legally and not by killing and slaving uyghurs , Tibetans and Mongols 🤣🤣.. If there is anything china didn't copy from West and Russia and using slaves to make cheaper copies of it and selling, then it will be another wonder of the world... In, India we are getting rid of Chinese things day by day and in the future you will get a made in China father and you can call him " Batman" (or Wuhan man) 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +3

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

  • @k.k.c8670
    @k.k.c8670 Рік тому +60

    Compare Fujian to Vikrant as your video says, dude! Not the Ford carrier! EMALS is not 1 step ahead of ski jump. It's 2 gens ahead, leapfrogging the steam catapults which is 1 gen away. Too funny that it tries to compare Vikrant to Fujian. They are worlds apart in size, tech, sophistication and capability. That's undeniable fact that any honest analyst will tell you.

    • @kdas2000in
      @kdas2000in Рік тому +12

      Actually it is just assembled in India only.

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Рік тому

      American EMALS can't sell to India supports Russia.. or India don't supports Russia then American EMALS can sell to India..

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +16

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @surojeetchatterjee
      @surojeetchatterjee Рік тому +1

      Its better to have ski jump than Catapult. EMALS is still a new power hungry technology which negates the catapult drawbacks. Both Catapult & EMALS r same pattern of launching Jets. Just the difference is in capacity of launching quantity & speed.

    • @BLT695
      @BLT695 Рік тому +8

      @@46_shivangipandey96 Stop joking, stop spreading lies, the whole world is using made in India.😡

  • @dennislam8065
    @dennislam8065 Рік тому +20

    Year 2017 - INS Vikrant vs type 002 ski-jump Shangdong . India wins because Shandong is made in china
    Year 2022 - INS Vikrant vs type 003 Catobar Fujian . India wins because fujian is made in china
    Year 2030 - INS Vikrant vs type 004 catobar nuclear powered Zhejiang . India still wins because made in China .
    Lesson of the day , never argue with Indians , they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience .

    • @aruns9079
      @aruns9079 Рік тому +1

      So are u trying to support India or China

    • @dennislam8065
      @dennislam8065 Рік тому +8

      @@aruns9079 India of course! Nobody can win India 's Vikramaditya the harbour queen and Vikrant the white elephant .

    • @akshattyagi5851
      @akshattyagi5851 Рік тому +1

      With their power also 🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @richardfan4122
      @richardfan4122 Рік тому

      Slinty eyed lam

    • @zulkanainbaharuddin2185
      @zulkanainbaharuddin2185 Рік тому +1

      What a reverse engineering statement. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @neolan2565
    @neolan2565 Рік тому +16

    India's vikrant is the best in the cosmos. No aircraft carrier can beat it. Only UFOs can. 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому

      Dream more kid

  • @elmohead
    @elmohead Рік тому +22

    Fujian has EM catapult while Vik has the cope slope.

  • @grimreaper2948
    @grimreaper2948 5 місяців тому +3

    There's a saying from where I come from "don't tell me Indian stories" or "don't give me Indian promises" and this is exactly the case in point

  • @hhwong177
    @hhwong177 Рік тому +12

    good jod for both!we will work together for peace of Asia 🇨🇳🇮🇳🇸🇬

  • @sirius5159
    @sirius5159 Рік тому +10

    Because India is the most powerful country in the universe.

  • @kashmirireciter4819
    @kashmirireciter4819 Рік тому +14

    There is no comparison between a dragon 🐲 and a suicidal ship 😜

    • @djboss9732
      @djboss9732 Рік тому +2

      Dragon which has no reality or existance.

    • @JHenry906
      @JHenry906 Рік тому

      @@djboss9732 But suicidal ship or aircraft exists used by poor Indians.

  • @firetree2007
    @firetree2007 Рік тому +37

    with this logic, Vikrant outshine Ford, happy??

    • @shrav2418
      @shrav2418 Рік тому +2

      Abdul 🇵🇰 its time for namaz

    • @kbooi5619
      @kbooi5619 Рік тому +11

      Vikrant - best in galaxy, so no need to compare. 😂😂😂

    • @ParkerAt941
      @ParkerAt941 Рік тому

      @@kbooi5619 only in the Galaxy?

    • @kbooi5619
      @kbooi5619 Рік тому +8

      @@ParkerAt941 Oops, sorry I mean universe, luckily no Indian has come here to protest. 😂😂😂

    • @livetextflourish4314
      @livetextflourish4314 Рік тому +2

      😁😁🤣🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁

  • @SoldierofGodAki
    @SoldierofGodAki Рік тому +21

    Indian being Indian talking about cheap quality 😂 while they import 300billion cheap product from China 🤣 we export 3+trillion which is equal to your country GDP.

    • @stevenmiller6001
      @stevenmiller6001 Рік тому +2

      Not to forget Forex reserve of China is larger than entire Indian GDP 🤣

  • @sohambhattacharya5376
    @sohambhattacharya5376 Рік тому +32

    Overconfidence Is killer. Vikrant doesn't come anywhere compared to Fujian. Come on man. Be rational.

    • @kbooi5619
      @kbooi5619 Рік тому +3

      Oh no, they are very near to climax, who do you wake them up from their dream?

  • @susanchoo879
    @susanchoo879 Рік тому +26

    Long Live India. Love from Singapore 🇸🇬 💕 💖

    • @MikePapaFiver
      @MikePapaFiver Рік тому +3

      From Sarong Party Girl to Sari Party Girl (SPG)… Singapore Zha Bo never fail to impress me with their self hating ways 😅

  • @aseanaguy7062
    @aseanaguy7062 Рік тому +89

    The fact is that the Fujian has more advantages compared with Vikrant, on paper at least, because we don't know all the maximum capabilities of these two aircraft carriers. What we all know are details that both Beijing and New Delhi want us to know.
    Another thing is that China has a way more developed shipbuilding capabilities than India, but India continues to further develop its shipbuilding capabilities. I prefer to be fair, taking all facts from both sides, Vikrant is surely a well-capable aircraft carrier, but for now, I consider Fujian to be more advanced because its design is a generation ahead of Vikrant.

    • @asirimaduranga8697
      @asirimaduranga8697 Рік тому +3

      @JCG Thewordis and hypersonic weapons say "hi". Lol.
      Hypersonic missiles cant be detected because its plasma absorbs the energy of radar waves.
      Radar waves wont be coming back to tell the position of the missile.
      Also it cant be destroyed via current laser weapons technology due to its plasma. Us air force tried it with a normal icbm missile and even it was a total failure.later the project was abondaned.
      The currently there are no anti hypersonic weapons.

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +9

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @zhihaoliu1668
      @zhihaoliu1668 Рік тому

      on paper at least?

    • @sqrone1
      @sqrone1 Рік тому +4

      Fujian province's 2021 gdp is a quarter of India's gdp, twice that of Maharashtra, with a population of only 40 million

    • @timmyhoward6638
      @timmyhoward6638 Рік тому

      @@asirimaduranga8697 Actually I think the Russians tested stealth plasma generators on their planes and concluded that conventional stealth technology was more effecient. I wouldn't consider a typical hypersonic missile to be any more difficult to locate than a su57 going off Russia's allocation of resources.

  • @thetruthinquirer
    @thetruthinquirer Рік тому +10

    There's a big Difference. Vikrant don't have Aircraft to carry. Fujian is overloaded with figther planes.

  • @frankfan9127
    @frankfan9127 Рік тому +22

    Stop the “feel good” video. There is nothing to compare. With catapult system. Fujian can launch large fixed wing air warning planes which can cover much greater distances. It can carry more aircrafts. Compare these two is insult to China. It took india 20 years to build 45000 tons vs China 6 years 85000 ton

  • @But2Star
    @But2Star Рік тому +4

    You can't find a single CCP media comparing the Chinese aircraft carrier to her counterpart India but on the other side, you can find dozen of Indian media comparing Vibrant to her counterpart China aircraft carrier. For the Chinese, they will do they can do best ... they don't make comparison unlike India, they always want to compare their products to China's. Why is India behaving so insecure?

  • @kkhalifah1019
    @kkhalifah1019 8 місяців тому +4

    When China built the 001 and 002 carriers, people laughed because they were STOBAR carriers to gloss over the fact that China managed to build both from zero experience and made them operational in a short span of time (001 rebuilding from Varyag hulk began June 2005 & commissioned Sept 2012; 002 construction began Nov 2013 & commissioned 2019). China didn't kick a fuss, she kept building quietly and launched the supercarrier-class 003 while India beat her drums loudly when she launched.... a STOBAR carrier (Vikrant construction began Feb 2009 & commissioned Sept 2022 = 13 bloody years!), claiming that it outshines everything China has! Lololol...
    Meanwhile, the development of the 004 and 005 are now quietly underway...

  • @Whatisnottaken
    @Whatisnottaken Рік тому +53

    The Vikrant is a generation behind the design of China’s latest aircraft carrier the high-tech Fujian, launched in June. The first supercarrier to be built outside the United States, it is far larger than the Vikrant, will be able to hold more aircraft, and most importantly uses an electromagnetic system to slingshot aircraft at takeoff. This allows the Fujian to launch far heavier aircraft, laden with weapons and fuel, at a far faster rate than the Vikrant. Aljazeera

    • @Facts..Checker
      @Facts..Checker Рік тому +11

      None of the major systems are made in India, not to mention the size, technology and long overdue deployment date. You called it a generation behind!

    • @The_Pandora_Paranormal
      @The_Pandora_Paranormal Рік тому

      That's what you learn when you copy off propaganda sites like aljazeera....the ems launching you are talking about is itself underdeveloped even in the US...thus questions the credibility of such claims secondly most of china's defense equipments are a nut to show and not to eat...hardly any of them are battle tested sadly even their soldiers.

    • @Whatisnottaken
      @Whatisnottaken Рік тому +14

      @@The_Pandora_Paranormal That was the news as reported by Aljazeera. This was confirmed by JournalsOfIndia regarding the EMAL System first deployed on USS Gerald Ford, followed by the Fujian. So I am afraid you are out of date. The JournalsOfIndia also reported that India’s second aircraft carrier named INS Vikrant, set to be commissioned later this year, will use the CATOBAR system to launch aircraft. In this, an aircraft takes off from a completely flat deck with the help of catapults.
      Well, if you want to put your head in the sand, that’s your business. If you want to believe that a rival country’s equipment and soldiers are inferior just to feel happy, just continue believing. Ignoring reality will not change the truth though.
      My earlier reply didn’t appear. Maybe the truth hurts.

    • @pixelite43
      @pixelite43 Рік тому +1

      @@Whatisnottaken Your getting your information from Al Jazeera, Its full of propaganda.
      Fujian has a completely flat deck and three catapults, reflecting China's effort to adopt the catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) system used on US aircraft carriers. Soo technically Fujians tech is on the same level as the Vikrant, I wouldn't be surprised China kept copying more technology from US and Russia, since they are such copy cats anyway. there whole army is a copy of Russian and American weapons made quickly with crap quality. Soo next time you do research maybe do it more thoroughly next time.

    • @Whatisnottaken
      @Whatisnottaken Рік тому

      @@pixelite43 Yes, everything coming out from China is crap and of such poor quality that the U.S is sweating over the advances in technology made by China. So much so that it is doing everything to slow down the latter's progress. I guess you are going to claim that the Chinese space station was based on stolen technology. We give credit where credit is due regardless of the country. You are free to choose what you want to believe and deny what is the reality. Strange that you consider what is positive about China as propaganda and what is negative as truthful news.

  • @crusadercatwoman02
    @crusadercatwoman02 Рік тому +15

    Fujian has Electromagnetic Catapult Launching System while Vikrant is using Ski-ramps.

    • @pixelite43
      @pixelite43 Рік тому

      Vikrant uses Ski jump System, It still enables the Vikrant to allow heavier aircraft's to take of from it due to the shape, And having Russian jets will do India good because there known to be better than the Chinese jets, like even relies on chinese weapons there known for being bad, but I still wouldn't underestimate the chinese.

    • @reptileloverreptile-vt6fd
      @reptileloverreptile-vt6fd 9 місяців тому +2

      @@pixelite43 have you ever tested their weapons and jets, or just guessing, because the only thing you can afford from China are cheap, because their expensive stuff is pretty good quality

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 2 місяці тому

      @@pixelite43 indian navy flies mig29 which is similar to F18..... chinese navy flies J15 which is similar to F15..... 2 totally different class of fighters... and soon the J35 will make the gap between china and india even further...

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому

      @@fatdoi003
      Don’t forget China also has the J-20

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 2 місяці тому

      @@Potilics this is about naval aviation not air force

  • @12nad22
    @12nad22 Рік тому +7

    为什么总是要和中国比呢?而且要和003比,印度的航母水准还没002山东舰高吧

  • @Jose-og909
    @Jose-og909 Рік тому +18

    Lol it doesn't even come close to the Fujian sorry, anyone who knows anything about the subject would know.

    • @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu
      @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu Рік тому +1

      Yeah fujian who's technology is 5 decade old .cvn 68 had it in early 70s

    • @blitz_Itz
      @blitz_Itz Рік тому +2

      @@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu wrong!

    • @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu
      @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu Рік тому +1

      @@blitz_Itz I didn't mean EMALS. The ship Chinese are boasting about ,US had it back in late 60s and early 70s ...

    • @shabotages
      @shabotages Рік тому +2

      @@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu so you guys didn't boost it like Chinese did?
      The only difference is Chinese is yours USA 🤣

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +1

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign so does the helicopter and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

  • @WorldsTravellerNomad
    @WorldsTravellerNomad Рік тому +12

    China keeps on producing more submarine and fighter air crafts out of their made in China robot factories like every other day, last time I checked China have like 70 submarines, and fighter aircrafts that fly in space and underwater. Here India is excited and making headline news of one of their single aircraft carriers made with indentured labor😂. India has to do better than this, No need to bask on your glorious achievement.

    • @rome316ae3
      @rome316ae3 Рік тому +1

      Chinese bot spotted

    • @WorldsTravellerNomad
      @WorldsTravellerNomad Рік тому +1

      @@rome316ae3 😂 lol real person here, even North Korea has 70 submarines. Given your country's size and reach, you should have triple or quadruple submarines and aircrafts or aircraft carriers. Either the people there is dumb or you have some kind of internal racism, this machines come of factory line these days too and nobody uses cheap, indentured, slave labor either. So you got to do better than this.

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому +1

      @@rome316ae3
      Mate, UA-cam is banned in China. Bro is not a bot

  • @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu
    @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu Рік тому +56

    Viki all the way. Fujian is a pride for Chinese people and vikrant is a pride for indian . Just like Chinese people were happy when they developed Shangdong of their own for since it was their 1st home made CV. Now we are getting readyfor 3rd carrier Vishal . Best of luck to both the nation 🥳🥳

    • @debovani9814
      @debovani9814 Рік тому

      you are giving best wishes to China? are you even Indian? They're killing our soldiers and encroaching our lands along the border.

    • @THEYUNOORGAMING
      @THEYUNOORGAMING Рік тому +2

      Naam padh kar hi hasi aa gayi 😊

    • @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu
      @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu Рік тому +2

      @@THEYUNOORGAMING ok 👍

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 Рік тому +5

      Inddians are dying 0f starvati0n and m0di spending tax m0ney 0n carriers

    • @Namahshivayofficial
      @Namahshivayofficial Рік тому

      How many have you buried or burnt who died on starvation. $0.012 per kg rice and same price for wheat in India can't let anyone die of starvation. Yes but knowledge depreciated people like you might surely die of starvation.

  • @cleavage0501
    @cleavage0501 Рік тому +2

    India's aircraft carrier is a miracle. It is rusted and can go to sea. It took more than 10 years to complete. I hope it does not leak. All the gods in India bless

  • @JHenry906
    @JHenry906 Рік тому +5

    Obviously Fujian is better than poor man's cheap low end affordable crafts 😂

  • @nabeelmohammedca
    @nabeelmohammedca Рік тому +8

    The title is misleading, in which departments does Vikrant outshine Fujian? Fujian is much larger and has far more advanced capabilities.

    • @BSPBuilder
      @BSPBuilder Рік тому +6

      Vikrant comes with democracy and human rights pre-installed, which gives itself a huge advantage against Fujian.

    • @nabeelmohammedca
      @nabeelmohammedca Рік тому +1

      @@BSPBuilder 😄 Good humour, but democracies aren't perfect either, but yes definitely better that dictatorships.

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Рік тому +6

      @@BSPBuilder exactly how democracy is india?
      how Caste system and democracy work?

  • @zx9260
    @zx9260 Рік тому +7

    只有印度人才会这么自信

    • @stuvaskwy
      @stuvaskwy Рік тому +1

      以后viKraft 還要和004,005,006,作比較,vikrant. 真先進

  • @balakrishna1961
    @balakrishna1961 Рік тому +2

    Thanks to India Media for *revealing so much about INS Vikrant*

  • @netajiadmirer9422
    @netajiadmirer9422 Рік тому +96

    tbh, im saying this as an indian fujian is way better than the vikrant period. Why u might ask? well... fujian can carry more aircraft , it can launch heavier aircraft , with more weaponry and airborne early warning aircraft more easily.Plus it operating with stealth aircraft even makes it more deadly and superior to india's vikrant.

    • @riderchallenge4250
      @riderchallenge4250 Рік тому +7

      The thing is India is experienced member in AC. China started using from 2012. India is using from 1961 including battle experience of 1971.

    • @guongnlm5529
      @guongnlm5529 Рік тому +12

      The Vikrant is the strongest aircraft carrier in the world. After 20 years of construction, it was launched five times and returned to the dock for improvement. The domestic production rate is as high as 70%.

    • @guongnlm5529
      @guongnlm5529 Рік тому +5

      As long as the pilots are experienced, we in India do not need fifth-generation fighter jets, as long as training pilots plus Tejas fighter jets is enough, f22, j20 are expensive industrial waste.

    • @netajiadmirer9422
      @netajiadmirer9422 Рік тому +7

      @@riderchallenge4250 I mean it won’t take much time for china to gain an equivalent amount of operational experience so..

    • @netajiadmirer9422
      @netajiadmirer9422 Рік тому +8

      @@guongnlm5529 under what context can u say that 5th gen fighters are industrial waste?

  • @roystonpereira2887
    @roystonpereira2887 Рік тому +45

    we are many years behind China ...China has got its footprint all over the world while we still cannot control our borders 🤕

    • @Space_Odyssey37
      @Space_Odyssey37 Рік тому +8

      Communal Politics aur corruption ki wajah se ham piche ho gaye.

    • @roystonpereira2887
      @roystonpereira2887 Рік тому

      @@Space_Odyssey37 yes, we need to move on

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +17

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign so does the helicopter and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @ganeshk8757
      @ganeshk8757 Рік тому

      India is lagging behind because of kiristanv poop left behind by bristish.

    • @shrav2418
      @shrav2418 Рік тому

      First ban all NGO's and anti india news media

  • @hoothoot5753
    @hoothoot5753 Рік тому +47

    In my opinion, we Indians need to understand our own limitations. Stop sugarcoating and admit that China boasts superior military equipment and production.

    • @shakunimama936
      @shakunimama936 Рік тому

      Yes that's why Chinese army is no 3 while indian army is 4th

    • @weishi9804
      @weishi9804 8 місяців тому

      who is #2@@shakunimama936

    • @shakunimama936
      @shakunimama936 8 місяців тому

      @@weishi9804 it's Russia

    • @Starlink502
      @Starlink502 5 місяців тому +1

      Chinese bots everywhere 😂

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому

      @@Starlink502
      It’s true tho. China is leagues ahead of India

  • @tdepp1178
    @tdepp1178 Рік тому +5

    Why is there a need to compare? India is India, China is China. They do and make whatever is good and suitable for themselves and their people. Both India and China have great history and culture, and were once the greatest countries in the world. Instead of being hostile to each other, learn to live with, and accept shortcomings, of each other. Indians and Chinese should put their differences aside, and work together.

    • @tankokkhim6029
      @tankokkhim6029 Рік тому +2

      Right work together n has better future.

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому

      Well said. I think both India and China should cast their "national pride" aside and set the border between them according to the current control line, then the two nations can be friend. Isn't it wonderful?

  • @Todthefrog475
    @Todthefrog475 Рік тому +27

    In terms of aircraft carrier India has an unsinkable one in the Bay of Bengal in the form of the islands of Andaman and Nicobar and the huge landmass of the peninsular India from where destructive guided anti-ships/submarines missiles can be used. Aircraft carriers are not for defence but projection of power outside the sphere of the country's dominance.

    • @AAAAAA-tj1nq
      @AAAAAA-tj1nq Рік тому

      aircraft carriers are for defence too you clown

    • @amit.D_K
      @amit.D_K Рік тому

      Absolutely correct 👍😊 i was just going to say this same thing , anyways you posted it 👍😊

    • @Indrajith4evr
      @Indrajith4evr Рік тому +2

      In an actual war, the island can easily be cut off and then invaded. Its unwise to think of that as an offensive platform.

    • @Todthefrog475
      @Todthefrog475 Рік тому

      @@Indrajith4evr Will find it difficult with jets, missile/ artillery systems, frigates, destroyers and subs etc protecting it.

    • @bitansana4721
      @bitansana4721 Рік тому

      @@Todthefrog475 abe environment ko barbad karne ko bol raha hei

  • @jayarajnair
    @jayarajnair Рік тому +12

    Dont show a boastful nature.Chinese are silent yet hardworking.They are far better than us in many aspects

    • @tforaodg
      @tforaodg Місяць тому

      No, Chinese are lazy and enjoy drinking tea.

  • @EscSec
    @EscSec Рік тому +84

    Stobar system still lags behind the Catapult. India is having a hard time finding jets for the navy and Stobar is the very reason why. A good catapult system has the ability to launch an aircraft with huge payload including extra fuel on jets for long flight. Stobar is honestly a bad choice.

    • @manofsan
      @manofsan Рік тому +3

      catapult system is a challenging technology to master, and not the best choice for India's first indigenous carrier

    • @timmyhoward6638
      @timmyhoward6638 Рік тому +5

      @@manofsan Sure but India doesn't even need to accept a new expensive EMALS carapult. Why don't they just try and use last generation steam catapults that have worked on the 10 Nimitz class carriers with 4 catapults each on a design that's 47 years old? This technology is very mature and effecient.

    • @manofsan
      @manofsan Рік тому

      @@timmyhoward6638 - steam catapults are known to break down a lot too, and take a lot of effort to maintain.

    • @timmyhoward6638
      @timmyhoward6638 Рік тому +1

      @@manofsan You'd have to draw the line somewhere, if you go like China and jump from ramp directly to EMALS it would be likely that it wouldn't work very well. Between steam and electric catapult technology wouldn't it just be better to proceed with the cheaper of the two despite its drawbacks so you can be more experienced when you get EMALS?

    • @manofsan
      @manofsan Рік тому

      @@timmyhoward6638 - sure I've heard about EMALS experiencing various problems. But it too will mature over time (it's not like steam can mature any further, it is what it is). EMALS may be immature right now, but electromechanical is naturally more reliable than than hydraulics including steam. Look at the automotive industry - they're always shifting more in that direction. Warfighting should too.

  • @ANHTUAN_ART
    @ANHTUAN_ART Рік тому +15

    Oh, great. Congratulations on the great successes of the science, technology and military of the Indians. May India become the world's superpower.
    I am always grateful to the Indians for their help to Vietnam.

  • @dhruva49
    @dhruva49 Рік тому +9

    Chinese ship is better. In China they can focus on technology. In India 60% of the time we are caught in internal issues like strikes, hartals, momin troubles. We need martial law for 10 years at least. Democracy is not for us. Chinese jet F17 new version performed better than even European and american aircraft in recent airshow in europe.

    • @ashishparashar1709
      @ashishparashar1709 Рік тому +1

      Do you have a mind what are you saying????

    • @sutapasbhattacharya9471
      @sutapasbhattacharya9471 Рік тому

      LMAO - obviously you believe the CCP propaganda myths! Here in the West, where I live, the phrase 'Made in China' means that it will be totally unreliable and likely to breakdown. Aircraft carriers are notoriously difficult to operate and use effectively. Take a look at the video "How Russia Stole and Ruined its Only Aircraft Carrier" to see how these authoritarian dictatorships operate - the Russian junk is pulled by a tugboat as its engine breaks down, belches black smoke and has only spent a few months actually out at sea - it is just a pathetic symbol to try to fool others. China has no experience in modern naval or modern aerial warfare. China is in deep crisis with the property bubble collapsing, Covid lockdowns, divestment of foreign capital and factories, an aging population etc. etc. Take a look at some of the China Insights, ADVChina, China Uncensored etc. videos before peddling BS.

    • @yoyoabhishek777
      @yoyoabhishek777 Рік тому +2

      agreed

    • @D.o.l.l.a.r.s
      @D.o.l.l.a.r.s Рік тому +1

      i agree with you

    • @prakat1082
      @prakat1082 Рік тому +1

      Agree 100%. India is a paper tiger democracy . Can any Indian vouch for knowkedge and dedication of any elected representative ? Shameless turncoat politics . Greedy and privilege seeking legislators .

  • @elchavo3372
    @elchavo3372 Рік тому +12

    Both based on Soviet designe, but China paid a lot of less for the their first carrier that they aquavired from Ukraine and their third carrier has a catapult insted of sky jump and far exeeding capabilities of Soviet designe carriers.

    • @elchavo3372
      @elchavo3372 Рік тому

      @@XubiSuby Yes, i see it now it has a catapult while Indian carrier still have a sky jump preventing it from launching more capable planes

  • @abeysenevisriyanga1982
    @abeysenevisriyanga1982 Рік тому +1

    WE SRILANKAN'S LOVE INDIA.
    YOUR POWER & STRENGTH IS OUR NEAREST BEST FRIENDS POWER .
    KEEP IT UP. YOU(INDIA) DID A GREAT JOB WHEN WE (SRILANKA) WERE IN SEVERE ECONOMIC CRISIS, WHICH WE NEVEREVER FORGET.
    HAIL INDIA.
    A FRIEND IN NEED IS A FRIEND IN DEED.GOOD LUCK FOR OUR GREATEST LORD BUDDHA'S MOTHERLAND.

  • @ashu8265
    @ashu8265 Рік тому +32

    is that even a question, definitely china because they have more ships with better technology but it will not be easy as they think

    • @08488737
      @08488737 Рік тому +2

      Bro I works in merchant navy, and i sailed in chainese built ships . Those are the worst ships in the world . They have quantity but no quality. In wars you may have more ships but what fights in war has to have good quality.

    • @blitz_Itz
      @blitz_Itz Рік тому +22

      @@08488737 U can't even properly write "Chinese" spelling. What kind of ship are you sailing? Military ship? Like an aircraft carrier?

    • @08488737
      @08488737 Рік тому +4

      @@blitz_Itz hey am I writing any exam ? I work on cargo ships which are built by china , s Korea , Japan. I worked on some ships built by chainese. Don't worry if we fight with those ships we will definitely win.

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +8

      @@08488737 Cargo ships are different than naval ones🤦

    • @nagappannk2001
      @nagappannk2001 Рік тому

      @@blitz_Itz he is a navyman not us.So he know something betterthan us.

  • @pinaky_AnvIkSikI
    @pinaky_AnvIkSikI Рік тому +32

    We need more like vikrant to counter Chinese aggression. Our three oceans must be strategic protection from any aggression...

    • @svd4767
      @svd4767 Рік тому +8

      We need more submarines than these heavy carriers

    • @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu
      @Sonia_Godfray_Hindu Рік тому +1

      @@svd4767 we need both in their respective role-playing

    • @leeeluu
      @leeeluu Рік тому

      @@RosierFoodsReviewsKavita +1

    • @Maverick-vy7zl
      @Maverick-vy7zl Рік тому +1

      2 seas(Arabian & Bay of bengal) and 1 ocean not 3 oceans.

    • @josephtempongko8914
      @josephtempongko8914 Рік тому +1

      Incorrect mindset regarding aggression.

  • @chinheat9565
    @chinheat9565 Рік тому +13

    Comparing Vikrant to Fujian? Wow and trying to imply Vikrant is better? Wow an Indian fantasy

    • @anjalikastarr2824
      @anjalikastarr2824 Рік тому

      Well, it is not unlike going see a Bollywood movie. Two hours of indulging in pure fantasy to escape from reality and worth every paisa.

  • @user-vw8ex6kn6b
    @user-vw8ex6kn6b Рік тому +9

    For a 14-year-old Vikrant aircraft carrier, Indians are indeed proud and proud The Fujian of China cannot be compared with it. After all, it took only four years to build the Fujian So India is a superpower, and China is only a backward developing countries!

    • @Ram-wd4no
      @Ram-wd4no Рік тому +1

      vikrant is a real war aircraft carrier so India taken 14 years...but fujjan is a Toy..so chines created just 4 years...😏

    • @user-vw8ex6kn6b
      @user-vw8ex6kn6b Рік тому

      @@Ram-wd4no Yes, the Fujian is an 85000-ton toy So India is the only superpower on the planet that can challenge US maritime hegemony
      ua-cam.com/video/8FC4W_3WM90/v-deo.html

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Рік тому +6

      @@Ram-wd4no That exactly the problem with india over competent with talk, but nothing get done

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +2

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @Ram-wd4no
      @Ram-wd4no Рік тому +1

      @@46_shivangipandey96 but not all parts...but Chinese all air craft and all army products copy from Russia and america..🤣 so India create indigenous but China create copy..🤣🤣

  • @howso5302
    @howso5302 Рік тому +33

    Don't compare to Fujian which is not the same catagory, just compare to the Shandong. Vikrant 45 k-tons vs Shandong 65 K-tons. Virkrant built in 2009 and in service 2022, took 13 yrs vs Shandong built in 2013, in service 2019, took 6 yrs. Planes Vikrant mig-29 from russia vs Shandong J15, all domestics.

    • @user-pe1qz3rt3f
      @user-pe1qz3rt3f Рік тому +10

      Don’t tell the truth

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому +6

      In fact, everything on ShanDong is indigenous ... Vikrant left the room.

    • @pixelite43
      @pixelite43 Рік тому

      @@biochemwang2421 true, but I highly doubt the capabilities of Chinese weapons, there known globally for being bad, but still I wouldn't underestimate them.

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому +4

      @@pixelite43 China ranks No.2 in terms of weapon sale in 2022. Think about that. China's share of the market could be even larger if not because of geopolitical factors.

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому

      @Pagleth Saxena Read more, man.

  • @TheTraveler2222
    @TheTraveler2222 Рік тому +22

    Comparing the Chinese Fujian to the Indian Vikrant is like comparing a Fighter Jet to a toy drone. The Vikrant can only carry Russian made fighter jets, has no catapult takeoff and is full of flaws built into it

    • @user-pe1qz3rt3f
      @user-pe1qz3rt3f Рік тому +1

      Vikrant might carry F-18 someday, but not raffle

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому +2

      I would say Fujian vs Vikrant is like jet fighter vs WWII propeller fighter.

    • @pixelite43
      @pixelite43 Рік тому

      Lol, Thats why Vikrant uses Ski jump System, It still enables the Vikrant to allow heavier aircraft's to take of from it due to the shape, And having Russian jets will do India good because there known to be better than the Chinese jets, like who even relies on chinese weapons there known for being bad, but I still wouldn't underestimate the chinese.

    • @TheTraveler2222
      @TheTraveler2222 Рік тому +3

      @@pixelite43 "like who even relies on chinese weapons there known for being bad",......lol, sounds like you've been living in a cave or more likely just came out of prison where internet isn't available.🤣🤣🤣

    • @pixelite43
      @pixelite43 Рік тому

      @@TheTraveler2222 well go on then, lets see if you can tell whats soo special about them you retarded bot.

  • @meth8848
    @meth8848 Рік тому +5

    How can you say that Not much is known about the Chinese Fujian then on the Title say that Indian Made is better judging by the name of the Chanel this Automatically comes out as being Biased coz now you have info on one side and not on the other and forcing us to believe India's Vikrant is better because you have info about it and Fujian is poor because you don't have information about it what sort of journalism is this......FUJIAN IS BETTER THAN VIKRANT simply because Chinese engineering and technology is far superior and this is not speculation it's a verifiable Fact

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Рік тому +1

      Let them have their pride. they alway want to be superpower.
      we can just sit back and laugh at their primitive way of thinking

  • @tuathaukui8565
    @tuathaukui8565 Рік тому +4

    India aircraft carrier is better than US aircraft carrier , US aircraft carrier is nothing compare to India

  • @witpiyush
    @witpiyush Рік тому +3

    Nothing is certain particularly when it comes to defense, is the beauty of China.

  • @jkf2526
    @jkf2526 Рік тому +3

    Vikrant was sailing, pitching and pounding longitudinally on the calm sea.
    Look here, the splashing waves on both port and starboard sides:
    00:26 00:28 03:45 03:47 04:18
    It looks like the vessel has a balancing problem yet to solve , doesn't it?

  • @fygfdger
    @fygfdger Рік тому +7

    Indian made it more than 20 years and China made it in five. You know the quality different.

    • @NO-nk4vo
      @NO-nk4vo Рік тому +9

      😂😂😂😂😂😂Indian scrap metal finally floats lolIt leaks oil and the toilet explodes lol

    • @lonerider3945
      @lonerider3945 Рік тому

      Lol

    • @peacefulmind6051
      @peacefulmind6051 Рік тому

      @@NO-nk4vo hello corona virus😂

    • @xillah_from_xinjiang
      @xillah_from_xinjiang Рік тому

      @@NO-nk4vo I have uploaded a video on brave PLA crying in India-China border.

    • @shabotages
      @shabotages Рік тому +1

      Because in 20 years the scraps metal finally enough to build Vikrant

  • @baron226
    @baron226 5 місяців тому +1

    India just surpass America and become the no.1 superpower in the world, congrats

    • @Potilics
      @Potilics 2 місяці тому

      Where did you get that information from?
      Genuinely curious

  • @Maratha382
    @Maratha382 Рік тому +26

    INS vikrant is made by malayali engineers in kochi 💪💪

    • @eternal1967
      @eternal1967 Рік тому +1

      Yeah boi. ❤️

    • @XYZ-se9fk
      @XYZ-se9fk Рік тому +1

      ❤️🔥🔥

    • @atharvagodambe5555
      @atharvagodambe5555 Рік тому +15

      They are Indian first😄

    • @varun1036
      @varun1036 Рік тому

      Lmao

    • @malwart2288
      @malwart2288 Рік тому +1

      Rockets, Brahmos from TVM, Aircraft carrier from Kochi. Congratulations Kerala.its no 1.
      But, BIMARU states couldn't even if they want - no coastline.

  • @hello69468
    @hello69468 Рік тому +9

    the differences of Vikrant and Fujian is
    Fujian can have any kind of aircraft and drone but Vikrant can only have helicopter

    • @SUNILKUMAR-lw8yt
      @SUNILKUMAR-lw8yt Рік тому

      Oh you get all information by nevy staff well who are you you are from defense staff
      Bhosdike nikl sala yha se kuch aata jata hai nhi gyan dene aaya hai

    • @sqrone1
      @sqrone1 Рік тому +2

      Fujian province's 2021 gdp is a quarter of India's gdp, twice that of Maharashtra, with a population of only 40 million

    • @sqrone1
      @sqrone1 Рік тому

      @Xubi Suby India's gdp calculation method is completely invalid and absurd. If India's radical and exaggerated calculation method is used, China's gdp can be increased by another 40%. India's backward industrial capacity, corrupt and incompetent government agencies, and low-educated population , These are important reasons why India's economy cannot develop. The inflated gdp calculation method is nothing more than a bluffing appearance, and its interior has long been corrupted. Any foreign company investing in India knows this and wants to speed up its escape

    • @reptileloverreptile-vt6fd
      @reptileloverreptile-vt6fd 9 місяців тому

      @@sqrone1 thats sad.

  • @wumao6797
    @wumao6797 Рік тому +17

    Don't just compare what each ship can do but how its fitted. Compare to the Indian AC the components on the Chinese AC are nearly all from China hence they are self sufficient if a war were to break up. How many of those components on the Indian AC is made in India?

    • @serpicotan6208
      @serpicotan6208 Рік тому +1

      China has managed to make itself a pariah among most of the developed world. If war were to break out, India will have several countries providing spares, equipment and intelligence.

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +7

      Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀😂😂how funny

    • @eternal1967
      @eternal1967 Рік тому

      @@46_shivangipandey96 cry hard beggar. They your country cannot afford and defend on Chinese plastic 😂😂

    • @wumao6797
      @wumao6797 Рік тому +8

      @@serpicotan6208 Pariah or not is beside the point. The question is how self sufficient is India in replacement of its parts and equipment. A good example is Ukraine. They have lots of support from the world but when the conflict starts look at how their replacement of parts and ammo. While on the other hand the so called " World " condemns Russia and keep telling themselves that Russia will run out of parts and ammo and yet they are firing at Ukraine like there is no tomorrow.

    • @serpicotan6208
      @serpicotan6208 Рік тому

      @@wumao6797 how self sufficient is China? It still imports raw material. A war is not just about self sufficiency. There are several factors. Israel turned the tide on a massive arab led invasion from all sides during Yom Kippur because it had friends that shipped them critical supplies. Also Israel like India has been fighting low intensity conflicts for a very long time and its soldiers are very experienced. India has been operating aircraft carriers for 60 years. China just started 10 years ago. Chinese are fond of grand gestures to showcase its power and this has led to several massive shortcomings like the high speed rail which is now in a trillion dollar debt, ghost cities and incomplete projects. In fact the Indian Airforce is ranked at number 3 and the Chinese Airforce, inspite of numerical superiority at 4. When a war breaks out the quality and experience of the men and women fighting matter. For all intents and purposes the average chinese soldier is a yes man who answers to the CCP and guided by CCP. How effective will they really be?

  • @renuvu9033
    @renuvu9033 Рік тому +2

    INDIA & CHINA FRIEND SHIP GOOD FOR ASIA REGION 💐💐

    • @1949-Shuck
      @1949-Shuck Місяць тому

      中印应该联手共同建设亚洲

  • @pradeeptudu5974
    @pradeeptudu5974 Рік тому +1

    Congratulations👏 to our engineers

  • @shivam-kd7dq
    @shivam-kd7dq Рік тому +13

    We should not get into this competition with China and big powers rather, we should research and make our own generation Z weapons like airships and radiation guns. For that we need funds but unfortunately more than half of the defence budgets goes in salaries and more importantly pensions. I guess democracy is not always beneficial 😅.

    • @shrav2418
      @shrav2418 Рік тому +1

      India should compete with china in every field

    • @alanssshh
      @alanssshh Рік тому

      well said

    • @tpb1006
      @tpb1006 Рік тому

      @@shrav2418 Chutiye, China is 5 times richer than India. China shoudl be compare with US not India. India is a third world poor country. Hungry poor all all over your streets and you talking from your ass.

  • @rahulraghu4928
    @rahulraghu4928 Рік тому +77

    The Fujian has some key factors that make it both terrifying for Taiwan and relieving for countries who do not want Chinese force projection near their shores. The Fujian is fossil fuel powered, not nuclear powered. That, combined with the lack of friendly nations within which they could resupply such a massive ship and the limiting factor of the First Island Chain, significantly reduces its range. The second factor is its name, the Fujian, is named after the province of China closest to Taiwan.
    It has been built very nakedly as part of the long term Chinese plan to retake Taiwan.

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 Рік тому

      Inddia is a j0ke s0 is their outdated Soviet era carriers and ships

    • @anirnaya
      @anirnaya Рік тому +25

      Do you know apart from Enterprise all the US carriers were fossil fueled????? You know there is a concept called underway replenishment at sea??? You know every blue water navy operates underway replenishment tanker (CVN's also use it but for different purpose like perishables...ammo...jet fuel etc.)??? You know China has 4 Large blue water replenishment ships that travels with their STOBAR carriers??? Do a bit more research bro before giving 'Expert' opinion!!!!!! Knowledge is cheap gather it...learn from it!!!!

    • @repealsection230forbigtech4
      @repealsection230forbigtech4 Рік тому +4

      The Fujian is an EMPTY BOX it is YEARS away from being fitted with internal structures, armaments , Radar etc. Truly
      s✝️up1d of Hindustani Times to make this comparison.

    • @anirnaya
      @anirnaya Рік тому +3

      @@repealsection230forbigtech4 not everybody works in CSL speed....if CV-17 to go by we can see Fujian doing sea trial by mid of next year....though we hate it but still there are tons of video with 'China Speed'!!!! And they have largest shipbuilding industry...their aeronautical industry is still behind US-EU but their shipbuilding industry is top notch....so don't count on it being 'Vikrant' late .. :)....

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 Рік тому +11

      The Chinese always have Singapore, Myanmar, Gwadar, Djibouti and oh... Hambantota to refuel 🤣. In addition, this thing has a range of 13000 kms and travels with fuel ships as part of its carrier group

  • @lenthokchom
    @lenthokchom Рік тому +2

    WRONG
    The fujian runs a different technology compared to the American gerald Ford. Fujian uses MVDC and Ford class uses MVAC, in terms of energy storage, fujian uses supercapacitors to store the electricity to be released quickly for the CATAPULTS. While the Ford class uses spinningfly wheels to store the energy, and convert it back to electric energy through a cycloconverter.
    This makes china EMALs more advanced and energy efficient. The ford one does the job but it is two different technology with two different approach. So the concept that fujian emal will have the same problem like the ford is UTTER NONSENSE.
    To power EMAL, you don't need nuclear power, fundamental steam turbines are basically the same as nuclear steam turbines, they all spin the turbines with steam. The only difference is one is heated by nuclear and the other by conventional fuel. The key is the energy management and the storage system nit how steam is generated.
    Hindustan times please do your own research before posting any crap.

  • @IndiAnFasod
    @IndiAnFasod 6 місяців тому +1

    Fujian has started testing its EMAL system.. and it is a thing of a beauty.
    And it has 3 EMALS system on deck..
    With brand new 5th Gen J35 planes to be tested soon on the EMAL.
    Endian can cry and hide in their mummy's armpit 🙂

  • @rudeawakening2346
    @rudeawakening2346 Рік тому +7

    I'm sure the Chinese carrier has an EMC electro magnetic catapult and the India ship hasn't. Some thing that makes the world of difference 😂

    • @rubenkhude3296
      @rubenkhude3296 Рік тому +1

      where you from

    • @rudeawakening2346
      @rudeawakening2346 Рік тому

      @@rubenkhude3296 your house. Up stairs. Any more dumb pagan questions?

    • @rubenkhude3296
      @rubenkhude3296 Рік тому +1

      @Apurbo Banerjee china just launched a emc carrier and btw India has way more allies then china

    • @rubenkhude3296
      @rubenkhude3296 Рік тому

      @Apurbo Banerjee look first thing is if china tend to go war with india then its gonna be q head to head war, destruction would be the same on the both side no matter who wins, so even if no allies join it doesn't matter but if even one joins its gonna be a world war

    • @rubenkhude3296
      @rubenkhude3296 Рік тому +1

      @Apurbo Banerjee where u from tho?

  • @k-mind5876
    @k-mind5876 Рік тому +3

    India has a lot to catch-up as its Vikrant is no way near to the aircraft carriers built by US & China. Anyway it is a good start for India to master the marine military in the future. Hope its 1st carrier function smoothly.

    • @anjalikastarr2824
      @anjalikastarr2824 Рік тому

      That's insulting. Compared to India, made in China quality nahi but they do have a space station orbiting the Earth.

    • @lishen9
      @lishen9 Рік тому

      @@anjalikastarr2824 it is insulting but many indians are oblivious to this insult and still make basless claims of their tech superiority over china even when facts and statistics stairs them in the face which baffles me

  • @xgguo3531
    @xgguo3531 Рік тому +2

    It takes 20 years for Vikrant to be delivered to India Navy, it is a record nobody including China can compete with. As for capability of the ship, wasting time to compare with Fujian AC as it has more advanced technology for its launch system, radar ,jet fighter, missle etc.

  • @blitz_Itz
    @blitz_Itz Рік тому +1

    Fujian is way better! But proud to be Indian.

  • @rahulkumar-hp5sw
    @rahulkumar-hp5sw Рік тому +15

    vikrant is not purely domestic, 35-40 percent infra, designs, technology, systems has been built by russia...yes we are proud to have this new aircraft carriers but would not had been possible without help of russia. long live india-russia friendship

    • @46_shivangipandey96
      @46_shivangipandey96 Рік тому +9

      Even Vikrants lift is imported from Britain's power generator from america radars and communication pods from Israel otto molera and sensors from italy ciws ak630 from russia superstructure designed by russians and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦‍♀

    • @iscifion7122
      @iscifion7122 Рік тому

      @@46_shivangipandey96 No one makes 100% indigenous in era of globalisation.
      China purchased a dumped soviet carrier from ukraine and made it's carriers based on that platform.
      What's wrong in taking help from allies?

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 Рік тому

      @@46_shivangipandey96 the paint job is indigeneous

    • @policiasando4358
      @policiasando4358 Рік тому

      why did you expose so much to tarnish our national pride.?

    • @policiasando4358
      @policiasando4358 Рік тому +1

      @@46_shivangipandey96 shut up. everything is made in india. everything

  • @supreme0497
    @supreme0497 Рік тому +10

    One missile hits any of them, it's gone. Conclusion : same

  • @Thorium_2600
    @Thorium_2600 Рік тому

    We will do the comparison in 10 years time.
    India , keep up the good work.

  • @parveenpaswanparveenpaswan9572

    Happy journey vikrant 🥰🥰good luck best of luck 🥰🥰❤️

  • @jai..shri..krishna..150
    @jai..shri..krishna..150 Рік тому +10

    I am missing chinese bots 😢

    • @samuelfernandez6233
      @samuelfernandez6233 Рік тому +2

      They are Chinese sponsered porkisthani bots . Bro

    • @NO-nk4vo
      @NO-nk4vo Рік тому +4

      😂😂😂😂😂😂Indian scrap metal finally floats lolIt leaks oil and the toilet explodes lol

    • @NO-nk4vo
      @NO-nk4vo Рік тому +2

      @@samuelfernandez6233 hi india beef bot

    • @xillah_from_xinjiang
      @xillah_from_xinjiang Рік тому

      @@NO-nk4vo @ARKHOS see I have got one👆

    • @desmond89
      @desmond89 Рік тому

      @@NO-nk4vo bot spotted 😱

  • @rajkumarj2545
    @rajkumarj2545 Рік тому +11

    First attempt of IND making an IAC ...is impressive. Coming years IND can surely make a nuclear generated carriers...with supreme technology.

    • @thomashom7514
      @thomashom7514 Рік тому +1

      Everything about India is in the future tense, she will be this and be that. In America we say “talk” is cheap.

    • @rajkumarj2545
      @rajkumarj2545 Рік тому

      @@thomashom7514 ...yes...we don't mind the past..bcz it's gone ...bt future ...we r conquered..mark my words...k

    • @thomashom7514
      @thomashom7514 Рік тому

      India needs to focus on their infrastructure, sanitation and manufacturing. Spending precious funds on the already obsolete Vikrant is just for Indian ego and pride. Modi needs to learn from Singapore.

    • @rajkumarj2545
      @rajkumarj2545 Рік тому

      @@thomashom7514 Ha ha ha ,,yes...we r not developed nation... meanwhile we r fastest developing nation...plm is density of population..Our project is making the human sources into resources. Finally IND is a trusty nation in all categories...k

  • @Xande667
    @Xande667 Рік тому +1

    india no1,Love from China

  • @deltasunnz1119
    @deltasunnz1119 2 місяці тому +1

    India took 10+ years to build a single aircraft carrier and on top of that 70% components are imported from other countries.. Whereas, China build 2 aircraft carriers in 10 years without depending on other countries..
    Building aircraft carrier isn't a joke, it takes money + talent..
    Thats why only a few countries operate such majestic gigantic battle machines !!

  • @menacceterro2554
    @menacceterro2554 Рік тому +3

    America i know that you wanted to see 👀 India 🇮🇳 and China 🇨🇳 war but that will never happen because we are the brics nation 🌎🤣🤣🇮🇳🇿🇦🇧🇷🇨🇳🇷🇺👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👉⌛⌛⌛🇪🇺🇺🇸⌛⌛⌛💃🇫🇮💃⌛🕺🇺🇦⌛👈🤫🤫🤫🤫🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @anay5142
    @anay5142 Рік тому +15

    I be honest here, fujian is better, in most of factor but we should not get discouraged by this fact.
    If they won in this round we make sure we win the next

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Рік тому

      NO Vikrant won in every aspect include size

    • @anay5142
      @anay5142 Рік тому

      @@jetli740 how

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Рік тому

      @@anay5142 isnt india want to hear that
      Vikrant is better. 😁😁
      Joke a side the Vikrant is your test run build carrier, the next one make it around 100K ton to complete with china 04
      good luck

    • @anay5142
      @anay5142 Рік тому

      @@jetli740 wtf are going on about

  • @mohawk548
    @mohawk548 11 місяців тому +2

    6 months later the V will be next titanic 🤣

  • @specialex7258
    @specialex7258 Рік тому +2

    I think Vikrant should be compared with 001 Liaoning and 002 Shandong, because these three aircraft carriers are all landslide takeoffs, and 003 Fujian should be compared with Kitty Hawk, Nimitz and Ford.

  • @tonnywang1049
    @tonnywang1049 Рік тому +4

    India No.1,China is just a little brother😃

  • @PraveenCJRegina
    @PraveenCJRegina Рік тому +22

    A major drawback of INS Vikrant is the dimension of its puny lift which lifts aircrafts from the lower deck to the take-off deck. Its dimension of 10m X 14m can accommodate only MIG 29 or at the most F/A -18 F Super Hornet till we develop our indigenous TEDBF program. Because of the shortsightedness of our admirals and planners, Navy is left with two fighter jets that it doesn't want to operate from the Vikrant, MIG 29 which has several issues with its air frames & LCA-Navy MK1 which will be limited to providing training to new aviators

    • @miralam2582
      @miralam2582 Рік тому +1

      Still the aircraft carrier is better than Chinese carriers with powerful propulsion and one of the best avionics in the world.

    • @iscifion7122
      @iscifion7122 Рік тому

      @I was There Still FA/18 block III is one best out there.

    • @Madame702
      @Madame702 Рік тому

      Your not going develop a fighter Praveen. Your money is spent on Army there most the Indian government spends it money. Which means you are not going have much of Navy.

    • @surojeetchatterjee
      @surojeetchatterjee Рік тому

      Its 10 years old design made for Mig 29 & TEDBF only, its sea facing so it will not be a big issue in long run.

    • @mr.striker1692
      @mr.striker1692 Рік тому +1

      @I was There you're wrong China made quality and quantity, india made talking and need help for other to countries to built that old aircraft

  • @jojored7966
    @jojored7966 Рік тому +2

    Indian media always use such articles to show their strength, don't forget that this is a platform that the whole world can see, this will only create more jokes out of thin air, the world jokes that the whole world is watching! There is no need to debate such reports, waste of time!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @BLT695
      @BLT695 Рік тому

      No kidding around, okay,India has the most advanced technology.

    • @jojored7966
      @jojored7966 Рік тому

      @@BLT695 sorry! Affect your work! great india world first

  • @chinahamyku6583
    @chinahamyku6583 Рік тому +1

    Why Made-in-India aircraft carrier outshines Beijing's warship?
    India is really a magical country, all self-confidence comes from Bollywood. . . .lol 😆

  • @VivekSingh-fb8vp
    @VivekSingh-fb8vp Рік тому +10

    Two to three things which give Fujian edge is -
    Can launch Jet with High Payload capacity
    AWECS Plane can be launched, which Vikrant will use Helicopter🚁
    Otherwise it's limitations is Its Convetional powered, apart from that same old Steam Boiler which makes things ugly.
    Vikrant has Gas turbines..

    • @amit.D_K
      @amit.D_K Рік тому +1

      We have 100 island's in Indian Ocean territory,😎 which are like floating aircraft carrier 😎 you just relax and leave it on our navy and airforce 👍😎

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 Рік тому

      You should learn more about warship power plants ... The US super-carriers are also powered by steam boilers, albeit their boilers are heated by nuclear power plant. Gas turbines have certain advantages, but boilers also have their advantages, for example, enabling a longer operation range and a higher max speed, both of which are critical for airplane carriers.

    • @VivekSingh-fb8vp
      @VivekSingh-fb8vp Рік тому

      @@biochemwang2421 but that's doesn't mean Gas turbine engine doesn't give sufficient ranges u looking for.
      For ex. INS Vikrant can travel up to USA from its base in India in one go.. without refuelling in mid sea..
      What else do u need more...
      Gas turbine is the present & future. Steam boilers were the past & we have known well as we have faced many problems with it in INS Vikramaditya..

  • @freegatemy
    @freegatemy Рік тому +8

    if an empty deck is any indication of a functioning aircraft carrier, China will be able to build one every year and not have taken 20 years

  • @nickparisilk9842
    @nickparisilk9842 Рік тому

    Way to go India 🇮🇳

    • @thomashom7514
      @thomashom7514 Рік тому

      You mean “a long way to go India!” Lol 😅

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 9 місяців тому

    003 uses DC battery to operate EMAILS, and ship recharges battery like a hybrid car. Ford uses AC EMAILS that get power directly from the nuclear source. Therefore, even 003 is conventional powered, no shortage in power to operate EMAILS. BYD designed the battery system.

  • @abhilashsundaram2432
    @abhilashsundaram2432 Рік тому +4

    India’s Focus must be on:
    1) Building another Vikrant class (45000 tn) carrier, NOT A bigger one as carriers are not as formidable but are great Power projections in High seas so 45000 ton will do the job.
    2) Advanced Submarines With AIP systems
    3) indigenous Nuclear powered submarines akula class
    4) TEDBF faster rollout as rafaleM and f18 are becoming expensive and obsolete
    5) Modern Stealth Destroyers with hypersonic Missiles.