INS Vikrant - Indian dream flagship

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 чер 2024
  • INS Vikrant is an aircraft carrier that is about to enter service with the Indian Navy. The first ship of this class, built by India on its own. The aircraft carrier was named Vikrant (Sanskrit for "courageous") - the same name was given to the very first aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy, received from the UK in the 1960s.
    INS Vikrant is the second modern Indian aircraft carrier, the first carrier now operational is the INS Vkiramaditya. Soon, India will start the construction of the third new indigenous aircraft carrier - INS Vishal.
    The aircraft carrier was built by the Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) in Kerala. The work on it began in 1999 and developed and launched in 2013. After a long way of tests, improvements and sea trials it was comissined in 2022. Total cost of the project is approximately US $2.9 billion.
    INS Vikrant is 262 m (860 ft) long and has a displacement of about 45,000 t. It's air wing will consist of 36 aircraft, including helicopters (Kamov Ka-31, HAL Dhruv or MH-60R) and airplanes (MiG-29K or Rafale-M).
    00:00 - introduction
    00:31 - history of Indian aircraft carriers
    02:48 - the Vikrant project
    04:05 - ship description
    07:22 - implementation and problems
    09:58 - strategy and prospects
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 791

  • @williamknows3908
    @williamknows3908 Рік тому +500

    Love india and Indian military ❤ from Sweden

    • @bhaveshbhuva19
      @bhaveshbhuva19 11 місяців тому +12

      Love from India namaste all ❤️ 🇮🇳 ♥️

    • @chiragmehta8212
      @chiragmehta8212 10 місяців тому +8

      Plz help us. I don’t understand why Europeans are supporting Muslims. Plz help us

    • @user-to4cj7gf8r
      @user-to4cj7gf8r 8 місяців тому +5

      We are also love Sweden

    • @okman9684
      @okman9684 7 місяців тому +1

      Let's kick turkey's ass together

    • @Varun091
      @Varun091 7 місяців тому +6

      Love & respect for swedish people from 🇮🇳

  • @rishwinpaul9411
    @rishwinpaul9411 11 місяців тому +227

    The markings and paintings on flying deck, captain's bridge, flyco and admirals bridge are done by our team... Feel proud to be a part of INS Vikrant. ❤❤❤

    • @iamward0g
      @iamward0g 7 місяців тому +10

      hey rishwin congrats brother, a indian military geek here bro. would love to hear more about it. are u on twitter ??

    • @Bhaskaran_pillai
      @Bhaskaran_pillai 6 місяців тому

      ​@@iamward0gI am with your mommy, playing in bed. She likes my banana a lot ❤

  • @bossdog1480
    @bossdog1480 9 місяців тому +59

    Well done India, from Australia. 😁😁

  • @stockholm3976
    @stockholm3976 Рік тому +120

    I love India! 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🧡🤍💚
    /Sweden

  • @joechandy1
    @joechandy1 Рік тому +113

    June 03,2013 at 1900 hrs.
    I liked the
    documentary, but as an ex sailor
    who served on the first INS Vikrant, the commentary states that INS Vikrant became a maritime museum,which is incorrect.
    It broke my heart when INS vikrant was broken up, and aold as
    scrap in Mumbai.
    Jai Hind

    • @hiteshrohra2991
      @hiteshrohra2991 11 місяців тому +19

      Yeah It played a prominent role in 1971 Indo Pak war and should have been preserved in a museum but the metal scrap was purchased by motorcycle manufacturing company Bajaj and they created a motorcycle out of the scrap and named vikrant

    • @hiteshrohra2991
      @hiteshrohra2991 11 місяців тому +10

      Thankyou so much sir for your service

    • @Dimapur
      @Dimapur 6 місяців тому +1

      With $melly $tinky Indians $hitting all over the ship, the whole ship became a high level bio hazard threat to any living being therefore the ship has to be demolished, destroyed and reduced to untouched and inaccessible scrap and kept in a complete isolated state of existence to protect the future of human race.

    • @Goku_sama322
      @Goku_sama322 6 місяців тому +2

      First Vikrant was a "museum" docked near Gateway of India till it got scrapped.

    • @PSP-lr7ms
      @PSP-lr7ms 5 місяців тому +4

      We can find the remains of OLD vikrant in "Bajaj Vikrant" bike😊

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 Рік тому +186

    Nice looking Carrier...OUTSTANDING India!

    • @ADARSH-qc7iq
      @ADARSH-qc7iq Рік тому +13

      Yeah, it's really making us proud. Wait for our aircrafts like TEDBF,AMCA and trjas mk2.... they are gonna be really damn beautiful and amazing

    • @Toptop80
      @Toptop80 Рік тому +14

      @@ADARSH-qc7iq
      You guys should be proud, its a big achievement to have a aircraft carrier.
      Congratulations.

    • @suryanshsagar2677
      @suryanshsagar2677 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@Toptop80thanks man. We've built everything; stealth destroyers, frigates, Corvettes, conventional subs, nuclear ballistic subs. The only thing left is nuclear attack subs

    • @utkarshgotpastries
      @utkarshgotpastries 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Toptop80 The third one is gonna launch next year, where are you from ?

    • @utkarshgotpastries
      @utkarshgotpastries 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@@suryanshsagar2677 Bruh what ? We've 2 nuclear attack submarines, INS Arihant and INS Arighat

  • @Rudraiya
    @Rudraiya 5 місяців тому +33

    From being the richest country on the planet after plundering and looted by British for 150 yrs India came to this position from nothing to this in just 76yrs of independence I'm so proud of my great country

  • @death_parade
    @death_parade Рік тому +229

    Nicely researched video. About the third carrier though, its likely that the plans for a 65,000 ton heavy carrier have been moved to next decade. Current plans seem to be building a sister ship of INS Vikrant. That way it can be built quickly and at lesser cost. Funds are also needed to fund 11 other classes of warships and 5 other submarine classes all being built or designed in India right now.
    As it is Indian Navy gets the smallest share of the Indian military budget as the lion's share goes to the Army and Air Force (because primary concern is China and Pakistan just across the border from us). So funds for a 65,000 ton Vishal class carrier will only be available in next decade.

    • @oadka
      @oadka Рік тому +8

      Yes! I was going to post this as well. The Indian navy has decided to go for a repeat order of the Vikrant (sister ship)
      And due to the experience gained, it can be completed in 8 years with minimal budget overruns. Vishal will come after that.

    • @prateeksharma6706
      @prateeksharma6706 Рік тому +2

      Navy seems more focused on submarines this time

    • @OperationEndGame
      @OperationEndGame Рік тому +3

      Yeah. just make a sister ship… a follow-up class should be in development in 2 decades.

    • @utkarshgotpastries
      @utkarshgotpastries 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@@OperationEndGame Less than a decade tbh

  • @RS-nh3hn
    @RS-nh3hn Рік тому +194

    Correction: History of Indian navy is way long starting from the Chola empire and its epitome during Maratha Emperor Shivaji Maharaja with staggering 400 warships of various sizes in the 1630s

  • @balbeernagi2390
    @balbeernagi2390 8 місяців тому +48

    Great effort and well worth it. It’s a lesson to be learned for India. From Australia.

  • @smartbaba1321
    @smartbaba1321 Рік тому +177

    You forget main one point.
    India have faced senctions from 1999 - 2007, after all those things, India bounced back & completed everything by itself.

    • @F22raptor46
      @F22raptor46 Рік тому +18

      I think you mean Sanctions not sections, also none of those affected ship building in anyway

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 Рік тому +24

      Sanction didn’t effect the ship building capabilities of India but it almost destroyed the aircraft manufacturing industry no wonder Tejas took so long to take off the ground (The main been cut off from its Engines )

    • @F22raptor46
      @F22raptor46 Рік тому +2

      @@wallingnaga6563 Sanctions were only for 3 to 4 years though and they had like 8 engines to use. They could have continued flight tests with that but they barely did

    • @coconutboy8198
      @coconutboy8198 Рік тому +4

      "everything"

    • @daveblueballz6659
      @daveblueballz6659 Рік тому +1

      another indian lying to hype up his country lol

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 Рік тому +37

    This is a great achievement for India, and the country has enormous potential. Just bare in mind that if India becomes too successful, it may end up on the 🇺🇸 's hit list! We all know how they despise a competitor, in a world they believe they own!! 🤔

    • @suryanshsagar2677
      @suryanshsagar2677 5 місяців тому +1

      Currently we aren't trying to flex muscles but in future we will and we know we will be on the hit list

  • @Ironhide234
    @Ironhide234 Рік тому +47

    First western channel I seen my life
    Without propoganda
    Without misleading facts
    True research is done by horizon
    Well done

    • @F22raptor46
      @F22raptor46 Рік тому +1

      There's actually quite a few like that, that aren't well known

    • @dallysinghson5569
      @dallysinghson5569 Рік тому +1

      You've not been around much have you XD

    • @Ironhide234
      @Ironhide234 Рік тому

      @@F22raptor46 mostly are Wikipedia copy paste channel without any research they just make video

    • @F22raptor46
      @F22raptor46 Рік тому +3

      @@Ironhide234 Wikipedia can literally be edited by anyone, so that's not exactly reliable

    • @NorthernMafia8
      @NorthernMafia8 Рік тому +1

      Remember when the Indian sub sank became someone left the porthole open

  • @tekgameryt750
    @tekgameryt750 5 місяців тому +5

    Indian Armed Forces 🧡🤍💚
    Jai Hind.. Jai Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳
    Vande-Mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @rickgolder6818
    @rickgolder6818 Рік тому +155

    The third aircraft carrier IAC 2 have been confirmed by the indian navy. It will likely be a sister ship of IAC 1 but with a larger body, increase fire power, flat top deck, and a EMALS Catobar system. It may be around 50,000-60,000 tone catagory.

    • @roshanjohnson7467
      @roshanjohnson7467 Рік тому +5

      Definitely wont have a EMALS CATOBAR. Its confirmed to be a STOBAR with the same tech as vikrant with only minor modifications

    • @rickgolder6818
      @rickgolder6818 Рік тому +28

      @@roshanjohnson7467 its not confirmed for stobar. US and india are currently working on development of indigenous EMALS CATOBAR, and also the budget set for the second carrier is around 5 billion dollars, and out of that 5 billion, around 1 billion will be used on the EMALS CATOBAR system. Even if they change there plan, then also its garunteed that it will have a flat deck, hence it will have a CATOBAR system. Also it wont be just an upgraded version, even though it will be a sister ship, the displacement will be larger than INS Vikrant (around 55000-60000 ton), with more indigenousness contents, more firepower, more space for fighters and even better systems.

    • @EngineerFormidable
      @EngineerFormidable Рік тому +6

      @@roshanjohnson7467 lol def gonna have EMALS CATOBAR trump already gave the tech lol

    • @roshanjohnson7467
      @roshanjohnson7467 Рік тому +6

      @@rickgolder6818 Wanna bet? Let's come back here in 5 years. I'll set an alarm. Let's see if we progress on EMALS

    • @rickgolder6818
      @rickgolder6818 Рік тому +10

      @@roshanjohnson7467 deal mate 🤝

  • @mmvs-mahilamandalividyasam9041
    @mmvs-mahilamandalividyasam9041 Рік тому +51

    Pride of India.... True, as it clearly narrated, it may not be the biggest or most modern or most lethal, but Truly Indian... There are only 6 countries in the world that have this capability...

    • @chheinrich8486
      @chheinrich8486 Рік тому

      Lets hope that if China ever goes to war again with india, the aircraft carriers are better than what the chinese have

    • @manisherande4568
      @manisherande4568 5 місяців тому +1

      Yes proud of what ? under powered with unreliable mig29k that too one squadron...we require at least 3 ready ...limited range... it is best consolation prize,,,,

    • @Dazaioak
      @Dazaioak 4 місяці тому +2

      @@manisherande4568 And which country in the Indian ocean is a threat to India that we need '3 squadron of mig29k'? Moreover, The carrier can carry up to 26 Rafale M fighters and up to 4 Kamov Ka-31, or 2 HAL Dhruv NUH or 4 MH-60R helicopters!

    • @manisherande4568
      @manisherande4568 4 місяці тому +1

      @Dazai_a yeah so against Chinese Navy you will be deploying one squadron 9n under powered migs...why do need a aircraft carrier...

    • @Dazaioak
      @Dazaioak 4 місяці тому +3

      @@manisherande4568 Where do you think Chinese navy will attack from? The East right? There are 2 channels of water, We have 2 aircraft carriers and the Nicobar Island. Maybe check out the geography, will you?

  • @prateeksharma6706
    @prateeksharma6706 Рік тому +88

    Even though it's not top
    Even though it had many delays
    Even though it's not most advanced
    Even though it has foreign fighter jets
    Then also we are proud of it cause it's first

    • @marcd5196
      @marcd5196 Рік тому +36

      not top and not most advanced? Building an Aircraft carrier of this capability itself takes you among the Top 5 or Top 6 nations out 190 countries on the planet.
      Chill down.

    • @postergmail6202
      @postergmail6202 Рік тому

      Really? I mean it’s India, Marc. What the hell do they need a carrier for?

    • @prateeksharma6706
      @prateeksharma6706 Рік тому +3

      @@marcd5196 dude we are the largest nation on the planet 5-6 is not proud for us but Shamefull😕

    • @prateeksharma6706
      @prateeksharma6706 Рік тому +18

      @@postergmail6202 we need 3 aircraft carriers cause we sit in middle of an ocean from where 70% of all world trade passes one way or the other

    • @marcd5196
      @marcd5196 Рік тому

      @@prateeksharma6706 lol really? we have been plundered and looted for 200 years. We have achieved this much within 80 years of independence.
      What was US doing after 80 years of their independence? Shooting Deers in the forest.

  • @MrAwsomenoob
    @MrAwsomenoob Рік тому +51

    funnily enough, India has actually operated every type of aircraft carrier. CATOBAR, STOBAR, and VTOL.
    I hear the next Indian carrier Vishal is going to be CATOBAR which is good. Cope-slopes are no way to go.

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 Рік тому +9

      Yeah we even went war with our Carrier in 1971 can created a new country Bangladesh

  • @SuperAvantgard
    @SuperAvantgard Рік тому +91

    Appreciate the hard work, effort and time put in to make a detailed video on the INS Vikant.

  • @Waywind420
    @Waywind420 4 місяці тому +3

    It's a really solid starter carrier for the Indian Navy.
    Pros =
    * Domestic made (so India now has production capability to make new ships and a pool of skilled engineers)
    * Cost effective ramp
    * Two carriers offers far, far more operational capability. Can rotate ships in and out of an area for sustained fighting, divert a ship to handle threats etc.
    * Decent size, comparable to anything Russia and France currently have.
    Cons =
    * 45,000 tons will get tossed around in harsh sea conditions, limiting operation capability. US carriers are twice as heavy and don't feel the waves as much.
    * Crew training will suffer given both carriers are mismatched by design.
    * No unlimited range, meaning logistics will be harder
    * limited sortie and payload capacity without a catapult system

  • @ashishajay3085
    @ashishajay3085 Рік тому +50

    OUR SOLDIERS OUR REAL HEROES 🇮🇳

  • @SKumar-kp7fq
    @SKumar-kp7fq Рік тому +29

    Awesome video on INS Vikrant !

  • @pmaitrasm
    @pmaitrasm Рік тому +15

    Спасибо большое за издательство. 🙏

  • @phaywin7417
    @phaywin7417 Рік тому +12

    Congratulations Indian Navy.

  • @83nitish
    @83nitish 8 місяців тому +15

    Only thing which both Indian carrier group lack as compared to American Navy is nuclear powered carrier and size also to some extent. But It has a enough range for Indian ocean, and well defended with Barak 8 and it has a complete carrier strike group with destroyers (with Brahmos), frigates also each have a nuclear capable Arihant class submarine that can deliver a nuclear warhead along with conventional submarines. China should be careful in Indian Ocean specially Strait of Malacca. Chinese govt. can't survive without Trade that's the route.
    Afterall, India is only country that has an Ocean name before/after it's own name thanks to Indian Subcontinent. So it must control it.

  • @borja1000
    @borja1000 Рік тому +27

    An enourmous achievment by India. Hope it provided the knowhow needed to build a few more (looking like they'll be needed).

  • @StupidVetala
    @StupidVetala Рік тому +54

    The history of Indian Navy doesn't start in 1950s it started with the Maratha Empire which had one of the most lethal naval regims of its time.

    • @NorthernMafia8
      @NorthernMafia8 Рік тому +4

      Navy with engines

    • @riderchallenge4250
      @riderchallenge4250 Рік тому +2

      modern indian navy means navy of republic of India.

    • @Priyanand-kj5ch
      @Priyanand-kj5ch 7 місяців тому

      First aircraft was the pushpaka vimana

    • @Princeduclare
      @Princeduclare 7 місяців тому +7

      Chola empire ;), even before Marathas. Don't forget the South bro

    • @lightyagami5483
      @lightyagami5483 7 місяців тому +5

      ​@@Princeduclareand Kalinga did it WAYYY before Cholas, so you too should not be so egoistic...

  • @srinivasnirmalkumaravula7829
    @srinivasnirmalkumaravula7829 Рік тому +35

    Pride of Indian Navy & Atmanirbhar India

  • @vibhanshuchauhan3328
    @vibhanshuchauhan3328 Рік тому +35

    India is building is a sister ship of ins Vikrant and ins vishal will be 4 th aircraft carrier

    • @veer8885
      @veer8885 Рік тому +1

      INS Vishal is delayed

    • @vibhanshuchauhan3328
      @vibhanshuchauhan3328 Рік тому +7

      @@veer8885 in it place vikrantsister ship will be build when it is ready near 2030 ins vishal plan will be finalised thus construction will start

    • @utkarshgotpastries
      @utkarshgotpastries 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@vibhanshuchauhan3328 Construction has already started

  • @shobhitgoel5608
    @shobhitgoel5608 Рік тому +13

    correction: Barak 8 is jointly developed by India and Israel and not license produced by India.

    • @Nirabhrasingh13
      @Nirabhrasingh13 4 місяці тому

      Yes it is. Please read about them. They still own the rights over Barak. It wasn’t 50-50 partnership

  • @ASH9366
    @ASH9366 3 місяці тому +1

    Love your deep explanation of Indian Navy 👋👍👋
    Thank you Horizon 🙏

  • @kyrios8518
    @kyrios8518 Рік тому +33

    More vids about Indian Navy ships and also the Chinese Navy Carrier Programme would be interesting, and also the Japanese subs please

  • @nssdatta
    @nssdatta Рік тому +79

    Barak 8 also known as LR-SAM or MR-SAM is an Indo-Israeli jointly developed surface-to-air missile (SAM) system
    Barak 8 was jointly developed by India's Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). The Barak 8 missile defence system is produced by Israel's Directorate of Research and Development (DDR&D), Elta Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and India's Bharat Dynamics limited (BDL)

    • @prakrit8284
      @prakrit8284 Рік тому +2

      Yes inspired from a israeli SAM

    • @rajatdani619
      @rajatdani619 Рік тому

      And it's Head basically Sensor head is made my Krass
      A kalyani and Rafael JV.

  • @vedantbhat6150
    @vedantbhat6150 Рік тому +3

    Well researched video !

  • @changeyourself2777
    @changeyourself2777 6 місяців тому +7

    It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳

    • @jusstinbarber
      @jusstinbarber 5 місяців тому +2

      yes, an aircraft career is just there to carry aircrafts. What matters the most are the planes that we put on it!!

    • @changeyourself2777
      @changeyourself2777 3 місяці тому +1

      @@jusstinbarber For that also we have made Tejas and will upgrade it and give it to the Navy. Our country is also working on advanced multirole aircraft 5th generation. We have also made our own Kaveri aircraft engine which is currently not giving as much thrust as we want but it Development is going on. Soon the fighter aircraft made by our country will be on the aircraft carrier made by our country.
      🇮🇳❤️😉👍

  • @prakrit8284
    @prakrit8284 Рік тому +2

    Appreciate the content

  • @jayasuriyas2604
    @jayasuriyas2604 Рік тому +4

    Awesome

  • @blackmamba3427
    @blackmamba3427 Рік тому

    Awesome video

  • @8bhushan8
    @8bhushan8 Рік тому +21

    From what i know, Indian navy is about to order another 45000 tone AC again and the company said they can build it in 6 years this time, and after that they are planing to order the 65000 tons

  • @Chan_shane
    @Chan_shane Рік тому +1

    What a detailed video

  • @rakeshbarman3486
    @rakeshbarman3486 Рік тому +8

    pretty good for first indegenious carrier ,this experience will help us to develop more advance Carrier

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 8 місяців тому

      It was obsolete the moment it was launched.

    • @sammy57533
      @sammy57533 7 місяців тому

      @@endeliggnist5066 and you would know because.....?

    • @babiswaster7047
      @babiswaster7047 6 місяців тому

      @@endeliggnist5066 just like the gerald r ford and queen elizabeth are obsolete the moment they were launched!!

  • @adityatimes2454
    @adityatimes2454 Рік тому +1

    Very nice video

  • @GoldenArrow297
    @GoldenArrow297 8 місяців тому +13

    With the kind of enemies we have in our vicinity, India needs many more Aircraft carriers like Vikrant urgently.

  • @arijitkumarashe556
    @arijitkumarashe556 Рік тому +2

    True to facts 💯 👏 👌

  • @alankucar8025
    @alankucar8025 Рік тому +4

    Cool video, hope the algorithm won't forsake it.

  • @globecosmos6072
    @globecosmos6072 Рік тому +1

    Yep, awesome

  • @edwardneal4819
    @edwardneal4819 Рік тому +42

    Thank you for the new post. As a subscriber, I look forward to new posts on all of your channels. Are there truly F18s in the Indian military?

    • @msb3235
      @msb3235 Рік тому +29

      They're not, but the model was one of the contenders for INS Vikrant's naval aircraft.

    • @radikal8485
      @radikal8485 Рік тому +22

      The contract is going to the Rafale - M most probably. And the follow on carriers will receive indigenous fighters.

    • @rajibchakroborthy4181
      @rajibchakroborthy4181 Рік тому +4

      No and india will never aqure it as us don't allow indian missiles or avionics there

    • @adventwolfbane
      @adventwolfbane Рік тому +1

      Mid 2023 should reveal which airframe will be the stop gap naval fighter for the carrier. But they will be replaced by the new naval fighter that is in development within the next decade.

    • @Thematramexpress
      @Thematramexpress 6 місяців тому +1

      No, not yet bro. Indian military operates USA made Chinook and Apache Helicopters.. Heavy transport aircraft C-17 globe master, Predators drones.. But it doesn't yet operate any US made fighter jets.

  • @N1lav
    @N1lav 7 місяців тому +11

    She is not even ther first Indian Vikrant, but she is without a doubt the first Indian Indian Vikrant

  • @ddvantandar-kw7kl
    @ddvantandar-kw7kl 4 місяці тому

    Great Video DRDO ISRO and more

  • @rajdeep1197
    @rajdeep1197 3 місяці тому

    Very informative video than other video creators ❤

  • @j.c.6390
    @j.c.6390 2 місяці тому +1

    Precisamos de dois desses, equipados com 25 caças Mig 29 navais,e 15 helicópteros de ataque cado um.No caso seria 2 porta aviões,50 caças,30 helicópteros.Um reforço espetacular para nossa armada. Um sonho até 2040.🙏🙏🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @marcosperez5103
    @marcosperez5103 Рік тому +2

    I think its wonderful........(said like a soccer mom).

  • @chheinrich8486
    @chheinrich8486 Рік тому +4

    India's Strategy for buying weapons: everything that works is fair game no matter who makes it

  • @hemantsethi1749
    @hemantsethi1749 Рік тому +1

    Thanks 👍👍👍👍

  • @jasper5878
    @jasper5878 Рік тому +2

    The name Vikrant has a nice sound rolling of the tongue.

  • @grahamkearnon6682
    @grahamkearnon6682 Рік тому +8

    Pretty sad that no mention of the Hms Hermes served in a war as flagship and, saw sea service of nearly 60 years. Also the keel was laid down in 1944 (WWll).

  • @avinash7003
    @avinash7003 Рік тому +1

    Thank you 🙏 🇮🇳

  • @tarrytao7508
    @tarrytao7508 5 місяців тому +2

    Love from Andromeda galaxy.

  • @eduardoquirino8131
    @eduardoquirino8131 10 днів тому +1

    Build your mighty carrier!

  • @trapperjohn6089
    @trapperjohn6089 Рік тому +16

    We’ve been trying to reach you about your aircraft carriers extended warranty.

    • @thedn3164
      @thedn3164 Рік тому +5

      😂😂good one but be aware we can even reach for extended warranty of space ship next time. Because ISRO and NASA are collaborating for a rocket NISAR

  • @eternal1967
    @eternal1967 Рік тому +19

    Glad u explain vikrant aircraft carrier in non boredom ot 12 minute, i appreciate u for that...
    Btw u missed one point DRDO has installed a stealth technology or the project Shakti System inside ins vikrant to make it less cross-section on enemy radar...

    • @flowzeta5412
      @flowzeta5412 Рік тому +1

      Anyone who understands microwave tech knows stealth doesn't work for large objects and that too traveling at such low speeds. Also, SONAR will easily detect it. Plus, aircraft carriers never travel alone. It's always part of a fleet of 10-20 smaller attack ships. So even if stealth really works for large sea objects, there's no point to it since the whole fleet cannot escape radar and sonar. Just because the government says something, it doesn't automatically become true. Critical thinkers can see propaganda a mile away.

    • @eternal1967
      @eternal1967 Рік тому +5

      @@flowzeta5412
      I appreciate your points but we got this information from drdo Twitter reports bro... Plus drdo even makes unimaginable stuff to take over CCP agression towards india like they developed SMART (torpedo missile) , xrsam (2x powerful and greater range than s400 and himars) , world's deadliest lch ,etc etc...
      So that's why i said it

    • @super-maneuverability592
      @super-maneuverability592 Рік тому

      @@flowzeta5412 dumbass.

  • @malarmalar1173
    @malarmalar1173 Рік тому +1

    ❤️💯

  • @johnrupesh4535
    @johnrupesh4535 Рік тому +10

    India doesn't lack in anything. All she needs is a little expertise in building weapons and soon we'll leave every other country in dust.

    • @postergmail6202
      @postergmail6202 Рік тому

      Hahahahahahahahaha.

    • @babiswaster7047
      @babiswaster7047 6 місяців тому

      @@postergmail6202 someone's bum is burning!!

    • @suntzu1409
      @suntzu1409 22 дні тому

      > india doesn't lack anything
      > All she needs is.....
      Ok bud
      Do you have the slightest idea how not-little "little" expertise is?

  • @NFR_Agartala
    @NFR_Agartala Рік тому +7

    I hope India starts building more sophisticated submarines

  • @ayushbose599
    @ayushbose599 8 місяців тому +2

    👍🏼Jai Jawan🙏🏼❤️Jai Hind🇮🇳

  • @nitinsinghrajput1
    @nitinsinghrajput1 8 місяців тому +1

    next one will be an sister ship by the way nice one

  • @MN-zl1qg
    @MN-zl1qg 6 місяців тому

    Its has to be understood that india is a democracy and it has a large water region to cover with the growing threat from Chinese Navy.
    Hence india needs to be having atleast 3 carriers in the ocean to counter any threats that harms freedom of navigation and rules based international order in the indian ocean.
    Also the fact that these are not shared by countries like US , France ,UK or even Russians to india.
    This caused much delay for india to develop their own indigenous carrier and battle group but now as they have delivered one class carrier they need to keep making more and bigger and nastier ships.
    Go India 🇮🇳 ❤

  • @Theoriginalsaxocomedy
    @Theoriginalsaxocomedy Рік тому +10

    Thanks ruski friend, thanks.
    You didn't used that traditional Indian song which I don't know but why it has been imposed on us by these some western youtube military analyst jokers, even Millennium 7 channel used that, totally killed the mood.
    Yours seems like, yes, you devoted time and passion.

  • @abhisardahiya9156
    @abhisardahiya9156 Рік тому +1

    Great video, but you got the location of Cochin on the map wrong, it's a out halfway down the coastline of the state of Kerala, not near the Karnataka border as shown in the video

  • @hansolo1804
    @hansolo1804 6 місяців тому +2

    To the Chinese, the scariest Carrier of the Indian is called "Nicobar". 🙂

  • @hillaryedmund6122
    @hillaryedmund6122 Рік тому

    Reminds me of Breznev aircraft carrier, however nice ship nonetheless

  • @rahulpalatel7006
    @rahulpalatel7006 Рік тому +3

    ❤️🇮🇳💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽

  • @kishorkoti2300
    @kishorkoti2300 Рік тому +3

    It most likely rafle m ,navy said its okay with f 18 or rafle m,airforce already operating rafles so it's will the most likely option

  • @Anilkumar-np3xc
    @Anilkumar-np3xc 11 місяців тому +2

    ആ കാര്യത്തിൽ "ജയലളിത"💪💪💪💪💪❤❤.അറബി എന്നു എല്ലാവനും പേടിച് തൂറിയപ്പോ അവർ നൈസായിട്ട് കൈകാര്യം ചെയ്തു.

  • @sunilbose1442
    @sunilbose1442 Рік тому

    I think CSL becoming like the Newport News facility of India

  • @markredacted8547
    @markredacted8547 Рік тому +18

    Can someone in the chat please explain why Aircraft Carriers don't combine ski jump with catapult or EMALS? as from my understanding the ski jump allows more lift due to angle, down side being limitations with MTOW on takeoff. But using EMALS you could have a shorter launch on a ski jump? correct. I'm sure I am completely wrong in my assumptions as it would have been done if it was so beneficial. But would love to know why it wouldn't work.
    Thank you Horizon for such an amazing video, I am constantly impressed with India's development and how quickly they establish home grown manufacturing for highly complex systems.

    • @iyawesome9863
      @iyawesome9863 Рік тому +2

      By the way, interesting idea. I admit that it is simply too difficult to implement and the benefits will be modest. In addition, takeoff weight restrictions will remain, heavier aircraft cannot be launched

    • @jake7824
      @jake7824 Рік тому +7

      EMALS and Steam catapults are always better than ski-jumps as you want to maximise your MTOW for longer sorties & weapon loads, it also allows heavier aircraft to be launched such as AWACS which increase the carriers capability by orders of magnitude. Skijumps are used A: because the country uses them lacks the technology for EMALS (it's still fairly early-ish tech for China and USA) B: the ship class Vikrant originates from was a Russian "Aircraft carrying cruiser" with a heavy Anti Ship missile compliment that took up a a lot of space C: it's a hell of a lot cheaper.

    • @rahules6090
      @rahules6090 Рік тому +2

      I guess when aircraft reaches the ski jump with that much force of catapult the landing gear may get damaged, I'm not an expert so take it with a pinch of salt

    • @kingdedede1066
      @kingdedede1066 Рік тому +5

      Its really impossible to have a catapult going up a curve and would be difficult for the aircraft to detatch from the rail if it stopped just short of the ramp. It would also place an ENORMOUS amount of stress on the gear to be flung by a catapult and then squashed as it goes up a curved surface. Hope this answers your question.

    • @golu28sh
      @golu28sh Рік тому +1

      Ski jump is cheaper... catapult system is expensive to build and maintain and does require a lot of power....

  • @bc9629
    @bc9629 7 місяців тому +1

    Any idea if india will be making our own ciws soon? I guess we are still using the Russian ones , not that anything is wrong with them . But would be great if india has its own on the way.

  • @mustaqfaniband933
    @mustaqfaniband933 Рік тому

    Atleast we have started building and now possess technology

  • @veeran3314
    @veeran3314 Рік тому +1

    Please make a video about uss long beach

  • @VivekSingh-fb8vp
    @VivekSingh-fb8vp Рік тому +4

    For info = 3rd Aircraft carrier based on same INS Vikrant has been approved and work has already start as stop gap to Mega Flat deck Supercarrier

  • @himansuprakassahu4499
    @himansuprakassahu4499 8 місяців тому +2

    Love from india all brothers and sisters😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @prateeksharma6706
    @prateeksharma6706 Рік тому

    We took the step now we will take a sprint

  • @vivekkumar-vp5sj
    @vivekkumar-vp5sj 6 місяців тому

    Oto 76 gun is installed or not I didn't see any where in the ship images or videos

  • @RSjawed
    @RSjawed 5 місяців тому +1

    My father was a sailor in Indian Navy

  • @rahulmajumdar8613
    @rahulmajumdar8613 11 місяців тому +1

    One video on Type 214 submerine.

  • @ansunil4
    @ansunil4 Рік тому +1

    Love the new navy flag

  • @Andrew-df1dr
    @Andrew-df1dr Рік тому +6

    India really needs to build up it's navy, if it's going to be strong enough to stand up to China, one on one.

  • @S_K_J
    @S_K_J 8 місяців тому +6

    IAC 2 will likely be the same as INS VIKRANT but will be modified for UAV operations & modernised and efficient than INS VIKRANT . After that only we can see a flat top carrier for Indian Navy . And we can see a faster delivery of IAC 2 than the vikrant . Rafale M has been chosen for the flight wing until TEDBF rolls out.

  • @lingth
    @lingth Рік тому +4

    wow.. the locally made carrier without planes.. good

    • @demonjay5790
      @demonjay5790 8 місяців тому +2

      @lingth it's have planes but you can't see

    • @lingth
      @lingth 8 місяців тому +1

      @@demonjay5790 it's like the Emperor's new clothes, only the wise can see.. 🙈

    • @demonjay5790
      @demonjay5790 8 місяців тому +2

      @@lingth like Chinese who makes quantities of ships but don't ports to dock😂

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 8 місяців тому

      @@demonjay5790 Where'd you get that from? They have ports lining up their entire eastern coastline, and a military base in Djibouti.

    • @demonjay5790
      @demonjay5790 8 місяців тому

      @@endeliggnist5066 hahaha hahaha Djibouti is African port not chinese port, I think you never learn geography amd you thought China owns African continent l, and india to have their nevy presence at Djibouti 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 idiots everwhere

  • @EnglishScripter
    @EnglishScripter 7 місяців тому +1

    Considering its new, It looks really old. Soviet like.

  • @ADARSH-qc7iq
    @ADARSH-qc7iq Рік тому

    Eagerly waiting for aircrafts to land on it

    • @marcd5196
      @marcd5196 Рік тому +4

      already done last month. youtube search Tejas lands on INS Vikrant

    • @ADARSH-qc7iq
      @ADARSH-qc7iq Рік тому

      @@marcd5196 not the trial ones, I'm talking about the permanent ones... currently navy have planned mig 29ks on it. But I'm waiting for rafale m and F18 hornet

    • @dibakarabehera6969
      @dibakarabehera6969 Рік тому

      @@ADARSH-qc7iq india not have a f18 hornet

    • @ADARSH-qc7iq
      @ADARSH-qc7iq Рік тому

      @@dibakarabehera6969 neither rafale M. Don't you know about MMRCA program? By this program india will choose either of fA 18 and rafale m for ins vikrant and ins vikramaditya in the future

    • @dibakarabehera6969
      @dibakarabehera6969 Рік тому

      @@ADARSH-qc7iq i know MMRCA.And india will choose Rafael because already India operate Rafael.
      Whenever India choosen f18 then so many term and condition Of USA India cannot agree and f18 has high maintenance costs. India cannot afford

  • @rajeshbobba3851
    @rajeshbobba3851 Рік тому +8

    Bharat should invest in a artificial islands in Indian Ocean region which act as unsinkable Aircraft carrier's.

    • @patrickbateman1067
      @patrickbateman1067 Рік тому +3

      The andaman already exists

    • @rajeshbobba3851
      @rajeshbobba3851 Рік тому +1

      @@patrickbateman1067 Apart from Adamant and lakdeep we need small islands in IOR

    • @shashanksingh9127
      @shashanksingh9127 Рік тому +1

      ​@@rajeshbobba3851 You Know About Agalega Island In Mauritius??
      If not Google it

    • @rajeshbobba3851
      @rajeshbobba3851 Рік тому

      @@shashanksingh9127 It is only for radar installation not for Fighter jets and military services.

    • @shashanksingh9127
      @shashanksingh9127 Рік тому

      @@rajeshbobba3851 Who knows, What if it gets transformed into a naval base in future 🤷

  • @avinash7003
    @avinash7003 20 днів тому

    Vikrant remembers how Indian Navy fooled Pakistan Submarine arm in 1971 war

  • @Mr.BR15
    @Mr.BR15 Рік тому +8

    India should make 5 more such small aircraft carrier ship with better engine and speed ..
    That would be Enough for India ..

    • @daveblueballz6659
      @daveblueballz6659 Рік тому

      why do you put two periods at the end

    • @aayush_789
      @aayush_789 Рік тому +5

      Yes all the military strategists should listen to you as you are clearly smarter

    • @postergmail6202
      @postergmail6202 Рік тому

      Enough for India to do exactly what?

    • @aayush_789
      @aayush_789 Рік тому

      @@postergmail6202 gatekeep Indian ocean and shipping routes

  • @saiautovisionbangalore4108
    @saiautovisionbangalore4108 Рік тому

    Jai Hind, Bharat Mata Ki Jai

  • @Raghu155_
    @Raghu155_ 4 місяці тому

    Joining the carrier club

  • @stephenchappell7512
    @stephenchappell7512 11 місяців тому +3

    Russia would be wise to purchase 2 or 3
    for its own navy allowing the retirement
    of its last aircraft cruiser

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 8 місяців тому +2

      It would not be wise for Russia to purchase foreign aircraft carriers. They need to build their own.

    • @stephenchappell7512
      @stephenchappell7512 8 місяців тому

      @@endeliggnist5066
      Indeed I meant the design
      which is a sound one as both
      nations operate virtually the
      same air group

  • @abhishekmahanta1112
    @abhishekmahanta1112 Рік тому +3

    Sister ship of ins vikrant is on the boards, 65k tonner is pushed for 2030s

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 8 місяців тому

      Another obsolete ship in 2030? What a waste of money. China could have built that in 2 years.

    • @sammy57533
      @sammy57533 7 місяців тому +1

      @@endeliggnist5066 so, whats your point then, chinas budget is 10 times more

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 7 місяців тому

      @@sammy57533 My point is that the Indian aircraft carrier is obsolete. Can you read?

    • @babiswaster7047
      @babiswaster7047 6 місяців тому +2

      @@endeliggnist5066 china's ones are more obsolete and are cheap copy paste!!

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 6 місяців тому

      @@babiswaster7047 Cry lmao.

  • @gogopedia
    @gogopedia Рік тому

    The next Sao Paulo?

  • @timothy1949
    @timothy1949 Рік тому +4

    I thought apart from the hull its mostly foreign systems? with Russian and Italian input and the engine is American? But no matter what, only a handful of countries can build and operate these ships.

    • @atharwamalawade259
      @atharwamalawade259 Рік тому +4

      Over 78% of the equipment used in the ship are of indigenous origin.
      Engines are American, Radar and Sonar systems are Israeli,