DESTROYING Some AMD GPUs With Portal RTX...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 гру 2022
- Today's video sponsor Go sign up to Linode here: linode.com/dawid
I do terrible things to some AMD GPUs.
Get some AWESOME Dawid T-shirts, Mouse pads and more here: dawiddoesmerch.com
Help us buy weird computers and tech to make videos on by 'Joining' the channel on UA-cam here: / @dawiddoestechstuff
Or you can support the channel on Patreon: / dawiddoestechstuff
Follow me on whichever Social media you don't hate
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / dawiddoestechstuff
Twitch bits on UA-cam: / @dawiddoestwitchstuff1128 - Наука та технологія
We went from “But can it run Crysis?” To “But can it run Cyberpunk?” To “But can it run Portal?”
Gotta love it.
Portal with RTX* FTFY
So true bro 😂😂
@@ResidentWeevil2077 shut up👍
Don’t forget Witcher 3…. And funny enough. Cyberpunk is the one that runs the smoothest on my pc lol
Will take ages to play this at 4K60 native maxed out.
Fraps? Now there's a name I've not heard in a long time.
Also, the RX 6600 trying to render Chell's wake up sequence is exactly how me waking up hung over feels like.
I belly laughed as I witnessed the card I have show it's performance. Ray tracing is very funny with the 6600 lmao
Give it a few years. That's how I wake up every day.
Fraps exists since mid 2000s
Haha!! Yeah, Fraps is nice and old school.
@@el_dallasyt Well yeah, they were saying they haven't heard someone mention it in a while.
Portal RTX is an ad for a 4080/4090.
Spend $1600 (if you are lucky) to get 45 FPS!
@@sammer28 I get ~50 on my 1440p Ultrawide on my 3070. Don't know what you're talking about.
H100 with display output or L40: Pathetic.
@@user-lk7cv8vg7r 50 is still not playable
@@E55666Zoomer. I remember when 19FPS was the norm. Besides I got freesync on. It's indistinguishable.
Portal RTX is basically Nvidia trying to say to people "hey, your 30-series card is out of date and you should totally upgrade!"
Marketing gimmick. Bet they purposely crippled AMD performance .
also nv: amd is trash look how bad radeon gpus are at games and don't put fsr in the mod
*cries in 1660 ti"
Run rtx portal on a 6000 series card,exit then run a port royal benchmark. Restart the machine then run port Royal again and look at the score. I suspect there is some Nvidia nerfing going on with Amd cards.
"Remix" is the first Beta-release of a full mod-plugin that you can just throw into many of the older games and completely replace the rendering-path.
Right now it trashes Radeon-cards cause it uses physical based textures for raytracing - and AMD is already using the texture-units for the ray calculations. Because of this they can NOT do textures and rays at the same time - hence any engine that uses textures to influence the raytracing will tank horribly and Radeon.
NVIDIA: "Look, we made a 15 year old game run like ass!"
meanwhile doom eternal woth ray tracing gets well over 100 fps with the 6700xt
@@simonhoel2704 Path Tracing =/= Ray Tracing. Completely different levels of tech. The path tracing is still a technology preview mostly. It is used in games like this mostly for fun and for showcase what the future holds.
Path tracing ignorant
Yeah but they also made it look like something AMD can only dream to achieve at the moment. A fully real time path traced game.
And that's why it's called Portal with RTX and not Portal with RT
It's basically made to run specifically on Nvidia cards.
Same deal with Tesselation and Crysis back in the day.
@@AlucardArkaine more than that, it's made to run specifically with RTX 4000 cards, hence why even the 3080 Ti is running like ass.
@@AlucardArkaine YEP
@@rossclutterbuck1060 Indeed. Though that might also be due to the increase in pure RT performance with the 40 series.
@@rossclutterbuck1060 To be fair, I wouldn't call that performance ass, just not great.
But yeah, much like tesselation, it jas been made to sell their cards.
Although, apparently, Unreal Engine 5s RT performance is much better than RTX.
This "game" is purposely not utilizing AMD Ray Accelerators, I'm 99% sure. Power usage is way too low on my AMD GPU (6950 XT Red Devil). Cyberpunk w/ RT ~320 Watts. Portal RTX: ~260 Watts, despite 99% usage in both titles. My GPU can run RT in Cyberpunk just fine (1080p with FSR Quality is actually playable with over 60 FPS), same for Quake 2 RTX, which runs really good at 1080p native. Every title that utilizes RT pushes my GPU to 320 Watts, just not Portal RTX, despite being RT only, wonder why....
Yep bro
Yeah that’s the culprit
Cos its Nvidia sponsored.
Someone actually dug into performance profiling on AMD and found this exact thing, portal rtx behaves VERY differently from most other RT games and absolutely does not use AMDs accelerators properly
Very likely as these types of NVIDIA experiments usually only serve one purpose - to make their cards look good. Usually achieved by making the competition look bad, by either doing useless things, specifically targeting features they know the competition is bad at, or kneecapping performance on the 'competitors' platform by doing things the most inefficient way - or a combination of these. From the top of my head.
NVIDIA bought PhysX and basically made it useless so PhysX games ran great on NVIDIA hardware and NVIDIA only. People discovered ways around it which NVIDIA initially had claimed weren't possible which they then proceeded to patch out.
Then there was Crysis tessellating areas under the ground that you couldn't even see and some objects to stupid amounts crippling performance - even on NVIDIA but more so on AMD cards so NVIDIA looked better on paper
Then there was The Witcher 3 hairworks where something that added very little visually absolutely destroyed performance once again. More so on AMDs side so than NVIDIAs so it was terrible for everyone but in particular for those with an AMD card. Slowly got remedied by patches and driver versions.
Now they're releasing an onslaught of old games adding raytracing using NVIDIAs black magic which hampers performance on AMD more than it needs to do to make NVIDIAs own products look good.
If they spend as much as time and resources on actually improving their products as they do on trying to make the competition look worse than it is then perhaps there wouldn't be a need for it in the first place. They already got superior ray tracing support - just be happy with that. Don't try to stack the deck in your favor when you already got a winning hand.
on any game running on the source engine (most valve games) you can enable the developer console in settings and type net_graph 1 to get a performance overlay
Great comment! Thanks for the info. 😃
True, net_graph 1 to 8 on older source branchs is only to 4 these will show more details, ex: 1 is basic info 4 or 8 more details
2007: Can it run Crysis?
2022: Can it run Portal RTX?
its nvidia game from top to bottom, no surprice.
its nvidia game from top to bottom, no surprice.
its nvidia game from top to bottom, no surprice.
@vmafarah9473 Well, pathtracing requires the best, so....
@@bryzeer5075 well thing is, the game is optimized for nvidia cards, and fsr isn't even available sooo no wonder you get such bad results
"Clean windows are the path tracing raid boss" - Well, yes. They are.
😂
I swear Dawid's Linode sponsors would never get old
I was just about to say that while most sponsor spots in most videos are just sorta 'meh', I appreciate that Dawid's are always entertaining in some way.
@@envirovore True!
Linod should have Dawid do all their advertising
LINOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE
Dawid is underrated.
Nah. He's overrated.
My man is awesome, should definitely have more subscribers. But as many say, slow success is better than fast success.
@@Aron25746 some fkin idiots will say "you need to have your own netflix show!" - annoyance aside.
Dawid will get more subscribers as time goes on. Quality stuffs and always entertaining.
I dont even watch major tech tubers anymore like Linus.
GN used to be entertaining but now they are super informative which is great.
HUB is on has quality benchmarks and great attention to details, I would rate them on the same level of GN
bro has 500k subs, wym underrated
@@rriot should be a mil
This takes me back to the 90's with such variance in cards and new effects.
there isn't any effects that cause this variance, the gpu is mostly idle when you check profiling.
Thanks nvidia, just spam registers till it breaks on anything but your driver.
Ah cool, we're regressing.
I'm pretty indifferent towards Linux-based cloud computing and web hosting services but I love a good Dawid & Linode sponsor spot.
😂
I knew things were gonna go poorly with the 6600 when I remembered I tried to "run" Minecraft RTX with mine
lmfao. Ballsy move there
I barely kept 30 FPS with the RX 6800 at 1080p
@@dracopug I was getting what felt like 10-15 fps, not terrible all things considered. Not bad for screenshots
It's the frame times that kill Minecraft RTX... But I also have a suspicion that a lot of the issues with Minecraft RTX stems from it being developed for NVIDIA and no thought is put into AMD implementation for obvious reasons. Ray tracing on games that favour AMD cards work just fine such as Forza horizon 5
I get 30fps on my rx 6600xt at 1080p in Minecraft rtx
So basically: Portal RT is badly optimized. AMD's raytracing is worse than Nvidia's but it's not an order of magnitude worse.
I wonder why Ray tracing hasn't caught on? It's almost as if overpriced GPUs which struggle to get 60FPS at 1080p and literally catch on fire (I'm specifically looking at you Nvidia) for gimmicky visuals that are primarily used for obnoxious lens flares aren't all that appealing when I can just not have Ray tracing and game at 4K with a frame-rate to make console players shit bricks.
Also just wanna point out that this entire vid felt like a paid advertisement for Nvidia, so here are some key points as to why that company isn't good:
1. They refused to allow open source drivers for ages which means Linux support is non-existent even now
2. The only reason they went opensource was because their security was so lax that a few butthurt script-kiddies were able to jack their insider information and blackmail them into going opensource
3. They gaslit 4090 early access users (think tech tubers) over the whole melting power cables thing and tried to hush it all up until it went viral, Radeon just straight up said they knew it was going to be an issue and that's why their not using cost cutting measures on their cables connections
meanwhile fortnite with nanite and lumen, both of which are much more interesting techs put on a much more modern game, runs at 60fps on a xbox series s which is basically a zen 2 ryzen with a gpu that's much slower than any of the ones tested here
just wanted to say that ray tracing is not just for the reflections, it's for the whole global illumination, and it won't necessarily make the game look better but give the devs an easier time, instead of having to use rasterization. But the tech just isn't there yet. Kind of like when tessellation was seen as something useless and gimmicky. And this game was clearly made just for nvidia gpus, intentionally throttling anything else
@@claudio7010 I'm yet to see one actual AAA (non-gimmick) game do what you've just said...
The majority of them are just using ray tracing as a gimmick to throw out "realistic" lens flares or nothing more than tech demos of what "the future could hold". The difference tho with tessellation is that GPUs didn't suddenly become massive space heaters that caught on fire the moment the tech started being introduced and you certainly didn't have a situation where it was more or less being used as an excuse push GPUs into early-obsolescence for minimal overall gains to the user base. We live in the day where console own the market, I don't think we're getting a new PS6 or xbox anytime soon so your GPUs aren't going to be good for anything accept "enhancements" and tech demos for a while.
@@banks3388 as I said, the tech just isn't there yet. The "rtx on" bullshit that's going on right now should not be a thing. The gpus aren't capable of real time ray tracing without heavy denoising and performance loss. Don't get me wrong, it's still amazing, but I am not spending 1000+ euros for a sub60fps 1440p experience. In my opinion, ray tracing will eventually just be an easier implementation of a global illumination
Way ahead of you! I happened to “upgrade” from a 5700 XT, a GPU with no ray tracing support, to a 6650 XT, a GPU with the same performance and 6600-like ray tracing support, just days before this game came out. When it did, I noticed the game engine just chugging hard at 1080p, and sounds repeating themselves four times because that’s how slow it ran. Then, I dropped to minimum settings at 480x640 and achieved 21 FPS average. It looked like garbage. Fortunately for me, as this video alludes, the original portal is easy to run and looks great, and all my other games also run well on that little card.
I’m in the same boat. Watching my poor 6600 xt get massacred was entertaining but it no where near justifies switching it out for just one Fancy Portal Experience.
@@acousticeel9695 same with my 6950xt. It's an really awesome card but seeing the RT performance, makes me think that I made the right decision because who really needs rt I like to play my games without it
Raytracing is a garbage gimmick that people pay $150+ per GPU for.. its not in 99% of games
Portal RTX favors Nvidia GPUs so don't feel too bad.
@@babyhandsthegreat yeah the path tracing is something you need a 40 series gpu for dlss 3
Portal RTX is really optimized for Nvidia cards... even with my Asus RTX 2060 and my AMD Phenom II X6 1090T it runs with > 30 fps all the time. So to me it looks like the game recognizes: "You are having a AMD graphics card? F*** off!" 😛
What a config, a Phenom II with an 2060, srsly get a CPU upgrade, even the cheapest Zen 2 for ~70$ is miles ahead of that old bulldozer CPU.
its a miracle portal is even running on your system
Why in the world are you pairing a 2060 with a 14 year old CPU?!? Your processor is probably easily outpaced by a Chromebook at this point!
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T? Wow! I thought I was running an old CPU when I still use 3570k (around year 2012). According to userbenchmark, even 3570k is 20-50% faster CPU and I've paired it with 1060 with 3 GB VRAM so we are talking about pretty cheap hardware here.
For the ones who didnt got the joke at 6:27, he closed portal rtx and started the old normal portal
They need to implement FSR 2.0, it would be a shame if they skip on this….
I bought a 7900XTX, and I'm curious if this behemoth can run the game with more than 9fps xD
Since Portal Rtx was made atleast by Nvidia Developers i would not surprised if it will never get FSR just out spite.
how is rdna 3 doing in this game? so far nobody has uploaded a video about that
It's not gonna look really nice but there is always the option to use RSR...
I had a pretty positive experience with RSR. I played the entire Jedi Fallen Order with it.
It was funny they said 2x the raytracing performance of last gen, and 2x15 is only 30 which can't be playable for people using high end cards often lol. You're so lucky to get an XTX I had been searching and refreshing the pages since launch and to no avail still
@@confide3734 maybe i had luck getting one, but it has not arrived yet...i guess the availability depends on the country you live in.
I love nvidia and its marketing schemes where it releases an overblown "game" to sell its horrible cards. the game just runs horribly bad on anything but nvidia cards, i mean the game doesn't even launch on intel which have a better rt hardware than their nvidia counter part (3060), its really really shameful yet again from nvidia.
Yeah I was really excited to use my RX6600 on something that actually had Ray tracing, but I launch up the game and it just doesn't work, I only got it working if I had the resolution set to below 480p, and even then the Ray Tracing was still broken
@@nesyboi9421 Don't be mad at AMD for that, I am 99% sure that Nvidia made this run awful on AMD GPUs on porpose. Check your power usage with Portal RTX and other titles that utilize RT. You'll probably see lower power usage on Portal RTX
@@themars2011 I'm not mad, I'm pissed at Nvidia for this stupid marketing ploy trying to get people to buy 40 series cards
@@nesyboi9421 I turn ray tracing on on Forza Horizon 5 and it works fine with my RX 6600, minecraft RTX is very funny and gets 40 fps. MSFS it adds immersion with the fan noise it makes xD IT TRIES.
But yeah, even this NVIDIA focused version of portal was made with DLSS to be turned on... even the 4090 struggles to maintain 60 with it off (or maybe even with it on)
@@nesyboi9421 nothing wrong with amd hardware, the 6800xt have 3070 level of performance on heavy ray traced "neutral" games hell even in sponsored titles like metro and control, but somehow nvidia intentionally made everybody else absolete with portal, hell they even made their old cards absolete with the new witcher 3 update and we all know CDPR have a deep relationship with nvidia, unless ofc you turn on the sweet fake frames to push for more than 60fps.
I’ve always used FRAPS. I didn’t even realised it had not been updated in a decade until recently. Still works though.
There was one big mistake i noticed. That was not a companion cube, it is ordinary aperture laboratory cube.
Companion cube has pink hearts.
that sponsor part thingy was all i needed to make my day.
please tell us how you come up with these ideas?
DLSS 3 is implemented in the game. Because it's a 30 series it's still there but only showing you the DLSS 2 options (Super Resolution and Reflex).
Merry Christmas (or what other holidays you celebrate) Dawid and Co! Whenever I see an alert for one of your videos it always puts a smile on my face, I have been going through some hard times over the last year(s) but i can always count on your videos to cheer me up!
"Me looking at my ryzen apu laptop"
*Laptop running away*
Radeon software overlay works well. Also, Radeon software gives you a bit more control when overclocking. For some reason, afterburner can't access the full features of the gpu
DLSS 3.0 as they explained is backwards compatible with DLSS 2.x which is why you're able to enable it to begin with.
yeah, but they don't permit you to use it unless you purchase or own a 4000 series GPU. Really scummy.
@Beanos Someone got it to run on a RTX 2070 super on CyberBug 2077
@@babyhandsthegreat yeah, but it isn't supported by Nvidia.
@Beanos there's no reason as to why they don't support it... Nvidia loves money and 40 series cards are a cash grab.
@@babyhandsthegreat yep, no real performance per dollar improvement whatsoever. Performance per dollar is around the same as the 3080 or 3080ti.
@Dawid Does Tech Stuff, you can also go into settings -> keyboard -> advanced -> enable developer console
then hit the "~" tilde key.
type net_graph 1 (or net_graph 2 or 3) to display framerate and package deliveries. Very accurate and built into all source based games.
I finally tried out Linode and it's way more user friendly then I thought. I regret setting up docker when I could of used this the whole time.
This is just like the tesselation debacle from a few years back. Anyone remember crysis 2?
Left a whole tesselated Ocean running under the map so it wouldn't run on AMD
Did you uninstall the Nvidia driver before you put the AMD card in lol
Now I need to see how the 7900xtx handles the Spitroaster 9000
I think it's quite interesting that the only game that can wholeheartedly take advantage of a 4090 is from 2011 and can be completed in less than an hour, oh and it was remastered by the company that makes the 4090...
From 2011? Portal came out in 2007. There are also other path tracing games too. Unless you’re talking about a different game
@@crestofhonor2349 I got confused with Portal 2's release date.
you should try it with an Arc GPU since it seemed reasonably okay at rtx previously!
I'm not sure, but i think performance might have been impacted by you leaving "super-resolution" on, despite no downscaling method working, might get some 4 or more fps from that.
And he left motion blur on (was off on the nvidia card) which explains the "smearing".
I am quite happy with my 1660 Super, as I only play old city buider games, ie, Caesar 3, Morrowind(OpenMW), and Panzer General(through DOSBOX).
You can set DLSS 3.0 to "custom" and that lets you set the type of DLSS to NIS, which should work on AMD.
This is nuts. I ran Portal 1 for the first time on my Radeon HD 6850 and comfortably ran at over 60fps.
Looks great, and at 1440 or HD you can look at every rendered picture very closely :)
Next RTX overhaul should be with CSGO, this game gets way too many FPS in benchmarks these days. Although I d0ont know what Rays are there to trace on Dust II :)
Alot of source games have prebaked raytaced lighting
Putting RT into a competitive game is just... Pointless.
Nobody will play CSGO with RT on, it's an online shooter and people want the highest fps to match their monitor refresh rate then they start increasing fidelity/resolution.
You think you have a high end card until you try good ol’ path tracing in Portal.
That's just optimisation problem...
The 1600$ RTX 4090 getting 70fps at 1080p in portal RTX be like 🙃
Portal RTX doesn't really work on a non-RTX card? Weird.
I never would have guessed.
RTX.
Also AMD cards can do raytracing... Just not very good.
Video title isn't "can AMD cards run portal RTX!?"
@@Gatorade69 Oh nyo! Nvidia-payed title can't run on any other GPU! NO WAY!!!
@@SHUTENSEPC Why you having a fit ?
I am a little shocked that the 6950 XT didn't handle the ray tracing a little better, but the other cards cost a fraction of the 3080 Ti and 6950 XT. Ray tracing is really one of the last barriers AMD needs to cross in order to really give Nvidia a run for their money.
Awesome video Dawid!! It was great seeing the same 6700XT card that I have get curbed stomped.
It was almost as if you could hear the cards asking for mercy.
Are you going to do a follow up on these when the middle range 7000 series come out?
2007: can it run crysis?
2013: can it run GTA 5?
2022: can it run portal RTX?
I was surprised how poorly my 3080 handled it
Scared to even try it on my 3070.
Dawid didn't ragequit the 6600.. .He had to rayquit.. :D
I was at work a few weeks ago and a dude in a Linode hoodie walks in, and I asked him where he got it. Turns out Linode is actually based in my city? Crazy.
Having heard Dawid say "Linode" is christmas present enough for me 👌🏼✨
Weird that DLSS 3 actually seemed to work on a non-4000 series card.
I think it is falling back to DLSS 2.0 but just says 3.0 because it is an Nvidia Card, that sad I did hear that they may be allowing DLSS 3.0 to work on certain RTX 30 Cards.
So my question is, does DLSS 3.0 Still work on RTX 20?? Dawid should try this.
DLSS3 is just a superset of DLSS2.
It absolutely doesn't use frame generation on Ampere
What Alfa Proto said. DLSS 3.x is: DLSS 2.x + Reflex + Frame Generation (option only available on 40 series)
@@thephoenixking1086 They should allow certain ampere cards to use frame generation. Like 3070 and up or something...
Even amd allowed last gen cards to use RSR when they launched that feature.
It's great you have a studio and everything, but I have to admit I miss Neko-chan.
Was waiting for you to cover the release somehow and this did not disappoint.
Always the first youtube video I watch when I get off work, thanks for the entertainment :)
Is there a video Linode isn't sponsoring! They are single-handedly making sure Dawid doesn't go into crippling debt
3:21 that lagging fade into existence RT effect is present in ALL RT games.
Portal 2 when it released: "I can run on a calculator"
Portal 2 now: "wanna fry some eggs with that GPU of yours?"
In the Radeon tests you still had motion blur on - though not sure how much of a difference that would make.
It makes no difference
motion blur makes no difference to fps rtx just sucks for amd
@@289kman I know but may be it would increase it by one or two FPS? ;)
Now lets run it on GTX 1650 - the most popular card among Steam users.
DLSS 3.0 is just the name of the latest version of "helper" from nvidia. If it detects it has frame generation hardware available, it will use those, otherwise it will just fallback to whatever is available to it. It does include every other DLSS tech that has come before it.
Afterburner/Rivatuner works fine for an overlay in Portal RTX.
Also, DLSS 3 is just an advertising name for Deep Learning Super Sampling (which is currently at version 2.5) + Frame Generation+ Reflex Low Latency. If you don't have a 40 series card it just doesn't let you use frame generation.
yawn..
@@retromojo1 ..?
you say that, and, clearly it wasnt working for him, so, as you see, it doesnt work for everybody always, so
@@arch1107 It literally works fine if you actually update it when an update comes out. I played through the entirety of Portal RTX with the overlay open to see how it hit my 3090 and I didn't even have to do anything (update or change any settings) on the day the game came out.
He's probably running a version from months ago or something.
@@AdmrlSpeedy my point is, you sre complaining about someyhing that can happen if you do not use ddu and latest version, so you saw a result
it seems you live and die by afterburner
fraps is a option that works sometimes
dont complain, accept that things not always go acording to plan, specially here
Portal with rtx is insane
Ayo, Dawid. When benchmarking Valve games, you can use console command "net_graph 1", that will show you frame time in "sv" compartment, real-time framerate and even latency to the server. Great video anyway :)
That dead eyed stare in the thumbnail is on point Dawid, niice
Respect ✊ to Mr Window Cleaner in Portal RTX for making the game look sooooo clean and shiny 👍🥰✊💪😇
Dawid, whenever I'm having a bad day, I can click one of your videos and your spot-on humor and content just puts a big smile on my face. Thank you
are you having a bad guy???
@@sip5720This is my favorite kind of typo. I once tried to say “far too” in a message to a friend, and actually typed “fart oo” instead. I sent it before I’d noticed, and because I’m an eternal child, after I’d spotted it, I laughed, hard, for a good 15 minutes straight. Good times.
@@sip5720 no, i AM the bad guy muah-hah-hah
Dawid you have become one of my favorite channels!
Jensen's dream to completely replace the traditional rasterization with ray tracing has yet to come true
Was the ghosting on the AMD graphics cards maybe because of that weird super sampling option you had enabled? It was instead of the DLSS 3, there was some TAA thing running at performance mode
It is technically same for Nvidia.
Except part that AMD runs at 1-5 FPS. So it just lingers longer so you can notice it.
Would RSR help the AMD Graphics Cards gain more performance/frames?
absolutely not because this game is made in mind to make the ray tracing performance of the nvidia cards way ahead of everybody which is wrong.
Yeah from 5 FPS to 10
@@kenos6939 200% improvement
Clear glass isn't the final boss, those pneumatic pipes that try to have real RTX reflections on them are the final boss.
I wonder how the RTX Remix tool will work as a whole (for every game modded) considering optimization. I was trully excited to see what people could do with some good old titles (Spec Ops The Line, for instance). Now, I'm just not that excited anymore...
You should compare the AMD cards to something like a 3050/60/60ti
without RTX amd cards (especially the 6950XT ) have on par performance with the 3080Ti and other, its just that nvidia's RTX implementation is more.mature
@@abhijeetsinghchauhan34 And gets the most optimization because, you know.
Dawid knows how to push hardware to it's limits!!!
Thanks dawid for showing the rtx menu, I had no Idea where it was and turning DLSS made the game run way better on my 2070
You can probably get it running at 60fps by changing the developer settings. The default settings crush anything below the 4000 series.
@@strangestecho5088 alright I'll check it out
Loving the frequent uploading of video's watching all the way from Barbados 🇧🇧
oh HELL yeah! some juicy Portal RTX content. I say that like my 2060 Super can run the game at all...
1080p with DLSS Balanced or Performance mode, reduce the amount of light bounces from 4 down to 2, some other small optimisation tweaks like that, you'll have playable frame rates
Wonder if my gt 710 can run it
Damn, if that's how the 3080 Ti performs then I doubt my 2070 can run it.
If you use DLSS, it'll run fine in my experience
You won't have a good time at 1440p with dlss off though
It's definitely playable on my 2070 though!
@@ethanblanch6517 Cool! Guess I'll give it a shot. Crazy how unoptimized new games are becoming lately including the new Witcher 3 next gen update.
@Kent Symie yeah, its insane
Unfortunately the 2070 just isn't what it was a few years ago
Even feels like games like black ops 3 and such are being slowed down
Liked, I want to see Dawid reach 1 million subs. You're very unique among the techtubers.
The Linode sponsorship made my day!
Yeah this the reason I went for a 4090 rather than waiting for the 7900 XTX, the 7900 is a BEAST and for the price definitely a better card, but I LOVE ray tracing so I went 4090.
good for you
@@derekhatake you're God damn right!
@@derekhatake Bad for his wallet :(
@@truereaper4572 You're god damn right!
*cries*
You should have tried with a 2000 series RTX to see if 6000 RX really matches one of those. Although that being said, it is an Nvidia optimised game. I think 7900 XTX might have beaten 4090 in some heavily AMD optimised one. So, never underestimate brand optimisation if even Nvidia's top monster can't always overcome it with sheer brute force.
True
Nvidia optimized is giving it credit. IT LITERALLY does not use AMD ray tracing accelerators.
@@engenheirocaldasodocumenta6172 That would certainly explain the numbers. And the name, which pretty much says: Only for Nvidia GPUs.
FYI for those watching; Steam build in FPS counter also works....but mine is grey and doesn't flicker? 🤔
I played this yesterday on a laptop 3060(not a max-q) with balanced dlss 3.0. Left all the ray tracing stuff on default which was max...and got 35-45, which was more than I expected and playable enough
you need to enable High Contrast for the FPS counter
RT is created by Nvidia to destroy competitor's GPU as a sabotarge strategy
I love how Valve made a game that normally runs on a potato into a GPU slayer.
Mostly Nvidia that did it though. This remix stuff is pretty amazing. Bet we're gonna see a lot more of this once modders start messing with it.
@@zwenkwiel816 It's amazing how they make a game run and look like garbage
@@E55666 hahaha.
Yeah no...
@@zwenkwiel816 hahaha. Yeah yes...
Love y’a Dawid, merci XMAS!
DLSS 3 includes upscaling and frame generation. So older NVidia cards can do DLSS 3 upscaling.
no, DLSS 3 runs as DLSS 2 on older hardware. As per usual, Nvidia are intentionally confusing and outright lying to their fangirls.
Crapping on cards known to be behind on ray tracing is kind of like making fun of a quadriplegic for having a terrible high jump. I have a 3080 in my rig and I'm no fanboy of any gpu brand. I don't get the point of this video. Still love your channel. Thanks for the content.
I guess Portal RTX is a way to make others switch to Nvidia
not nvidia, rtx 4000. obviously a marketing ploy. everything that is not a 4000 is sabotaged
I won't, it just makes me sad.
It's only a bit of a bonus, really. It's clearly made for the 40 series and nothing else.
@@GraveUypo Nah not really. As you probably saw the 3080 TI Was doing well enough even without DLSS at the HIGH preset with motion blur off. Granted you are playing 1080p but still the game looks stunning and definitely does not require 40 Series to run well. Just tweak the settings and you're good for 60 fps even with a 3070. It is a marketing ploy obviously, there's no reason to make this overhaul of a 2009 game if not for marketing.
@@BjornsTIR it is made for cards that can do ray tracing. Obviously there are not so many out there. Slapping RTX on two previous generations of cards was simply a gimmick by nVidia marketing department.
Linode is officially my favorite company because they single handedly keep supporting my Dawid addiction.
Best line of 2022- Ghosting behind the Toilet 🤣 had me dieing 🤣
Portal has shown the world how pointless RT is IMO. We can get almost the same effects with the lighting solutions we have now for a MUCH lower cost. RT is there to push DLSS which pushes nvidia GPUs. Nobody asked for the tech and only those who care more about FPS than gameplay like RTX.
Yeah, it is just a marketing gimmick. Even a damn 700$ 3080ti can’t pull steady 60fps on 1080p, only for what? Shiny reflections and fancy lighting
I Love How Everybody Else Is Using 40 Series For Portal And Hes Using AMD....LOVE IT
On my RTX 3080, with DLSS 3.0 it works on pretty much max with 45-60fps, without DLSS its like 30 or less.
Dawid needs some Radeon 7000 series cards to test the ray-tracing on.
I love Dawids attempt at making the meme face of that constipated guy.....fantastical.
It's 4am and I was stuck on whether to watch now or when I wake up.
But as soon as I saw Linode in the description, I knew what had to be done.
Another thing I've seen basically nobody test on the 7900XTX: Minecraft Bedrock's ray tracing. I don't know why nobody tests it, considering how it seems to be almost fully raytraced, and doesn't support upscaling to make it easier (it's DLSS only).
Great video! Would have loved to see some tests of Turing (RTX 2000) curious how well those cards run this game relative to the RX 6000 and RTX 3000 cards.
RTX 2080 Super 1080p around 35fps.
@@asiano3385 thanks, really surprised that there is such a difference between RDNA2 and RTX 2000 for Ray Tracing. Wonder if RDNA3 can beat the RTX 2000.
@@tails2299 7900xtx is 3090 level but the game is so badly optimised for it since nvidia made it that a 3070 may beat a 7900xtx in this