How Speed Limiters Will RUIN Cars... (And Motorcycles)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
- Welcome to our video discussing the recent new law where all new cars sold musty be fitted with a speed limiter. Politicians have already stated that motorcycles will also have mandatory speed limiter fitted to them when the technology allows for it. In an aim to improve road safety, have governments just killed the car industry? It looks likely. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Please be sure to leave a Like, Comment, and Subscribe if you enjoy our content, and would like to support the channel.
Instagram: @goblinrides
Facebook: / goblinrides
End Credits:
Rip & Tear - Mick Gordon (DOOM 2016 Soundtrack)
Rip & Tear - The Anchor (Cover)
Thanks for watching. - Авто та транспорт
You will own nothing and be happy that is what is coming
You will OWN NOTHING, you will go NOWHERE, you will EAT ZE BUGS and be happy.
that's awesome that you know this quote. looks like most bikers seem to understand the global communistic nightmare that's coming. 😊
@@cloudbasenirvana all while the billionaires will pee on your face for that trickle down economics.
This is temporary... when the police lose most of their funding from traffic violation fines this will be reversed.
@@cloudbasenirvana Exactly my thoughts ! in a 15 minute city there is NO point wasting heavily taxed wages on commodities like personal transport. Just think how much government money will be saved on infrastructure ! and how much the individual will be better off. every 1 a winner, NOT !
I will refuse any new car at this point, im not giving up my freedom no matter what!
Well said....respect..
Not good enough for us to just old man it and try hold on to our current vehicles, we need to invest time and understanding into bypassing this garbage and maintaining freedoms for the next generations.
@@bearwolffish good point, I'm only 16 so this will be interesting to see how it's implemented and how to bypass it in the years to come
When Europe gave up weapons they gave up their freedom.
Live off grid
Tuners & IT specialists, save us from those non-sense restrictions. 🙏🏼
🙏🏽
Who calls the shots? Who do you think?
They may get fined heavily or get shut down
At the age of 87, my bike will see me to the end. It's been a great ride, and I feel sorry for the young ones coming along who will not be able to enjoy the total freedom a fast bike gives you. R I P motorcycling, you were great while you lasted.
87? Respect!
Fast bikes won't go anywhere.
They WILL get bypassed. And will be terrorizing the streets the same way. If you don't get caught, there's no crime.
@@MiGujack3I'm going to assume they'd make the punishment for bypassing the limiter impounding the vehicle. Hence if a cop spotted me I would haul @$$ like we're talking high speed chase any time they decide they want to try pursuing me, I wouldn't be pulling over so it's either I get away or I wreck. This may just be how that punishment would change drastically how I respond to getting spotted when speeding.
In the uk the most common reasons for crashes is distractions. Yet so many new cars have virtual cockpits, heads up displays, etc. Why dont they try to stop this. Some new cars like VWs and teslas have headlight controls on screens or in the infortainment system.
If the government really care so much about safety, why dont they have legislation to stop this? I can understand why speed limiters can be considered, but why do they not care about this issue.
Surely the government will miss out on millions of speeding fines with this rubbish.
Wrong. Because they wiil make up the loss pluss a bit more somewhere else.
No amount of speeding fines will come even close to the expense of traffic collisions. A collision between two drivers can easily exceed 100K pounds even if no one was badly hurt.
Government accountants would just prefer you to take public transportation, walk, or bike, because driving is really really expensive. You need public parking, public roads, public medical care for the inevitable collisions, and so on.
@@langhamp8912 insurance pays for that?? not the governemnt haha
@@MrDylanButton Even in the US where much of health insurance is private (or uninsured), traffic collisions account for the majority of publicly funded emergency services. For instance, 97% of EMS calls are for traffic collisions and about half of those traffic collisions are uninsured motorists.
Your insurance just gives you a (small) discount; publicly funded EMS and hospital care accounts for the majority of health care and that is tax funded.
Driving and wrecking is just really expensive, and that's why your government's accountants would prefer you do something...anything...else.
@@langhamp8912 mate I'd love to stop crashing but I think there's a magnet on my cars or smth cuz I've been crashed into twice!! while stationary both times??
They won't be able to have a PHYSICAL speed limiter on Motorcycles, it's dangerous and the deaths caused by it will not be tolerated. Sometimes you NEED to accelerate out of bad situations to avoid an horrific crash, something you can't do in a car so easily. You have little to no protection on a Bike, and I'm sure with the right opposition it will be scrapped.
Same applies to cars.
I think the EU will force this. There won't be any opposition because "tHiNk oF tHe cHiLDren" and "uNSaFe"
Trying to control everything
I'm going to go put up fake speed limits...
Suddenly lots of 100mph B roads start appearing lol.
it has nothing to do with your speed... its simply another tool to control you.
Remember, any STATUTORY ACT OF PARLIAMENT requires your CONSENT to give it the power of a LAW .
Haven't they already made it a law?
@@dud8905 it's a European law. It is not valid in GB.
Keep your eyes open though as Labour has a history of teasing with one hand and stabbing you in the back with the other. Often done in hiding and we the public definitely do not have a say. That's democracy.😊
Meanwhile in the real world. The government have a monopoly on force and instititional backing that means you will do what they say regardless of your perception of your individual soveriegnty. Sucks but is what it is.
its gunna be peak when garages provide services to remove it
Mate does tuning he literally can ecu flash anything
It would be totally illegal though and wouldn't pass an MOT.
@@deviousdescent9010 dodge mot, you think people dont already by pass de cats and straight pipe restrictions? Governemnt introducing new laws and banning things doesnt stop people doing them. Just makes them do it illegally and dangously. This applies to driving, drugs, pretty much anything they decide to ban. Banning things doesnt really work
@@MrDylanButton Like the prohibition era in the US. Ban alochol and a whole gang was made haha
We were conned into Start Stop systems so our cars would die faster and we would start buying cars like they're iPhones
Please elaborate. I have start stop on my old volvo but I keep it off because it feels wrong.
@@MalfunctioningAndroid Anything to make cars last less and shift blame or redefine the new normal
Here in Belgium in the news i heard it's only gonne be an alarm when you exceed the speed limit . And you can put it off , every time you start the car 🤔
Fight for your freedoms. Although I would love to visit Belgium someday.
If this system is using GPS to know which road the car is on and the speed limit of the road, it will cause huge crashes around motorway junctions. While driving along the motorway, I have seen my GPS speed limit on google maps change to either the offramp speed limit (50-40mph) or the road passing underneath the motorway (50-30mph), If this happens with a speed limiter, it would try to slow down the car while still on a 70mph motorway.
Even though it is coming to the uk you will be able to override the system by pressing your throttle, which after a few seconds will cancel the warnings etc until you switch it off. When you start the engine again it will have reset back to giving out speed warnings and you'll have to do the same again! Not a big deal really, just slightly annoying 🤬
Welcome to the new world. Where you have no agency in life and get told what to do and when to do it.
.....and if you refuse they remotely disable your bike / car /van and turn off your digital currency tokens wallet and your (not so) SMART water, gas and electricity.
Obey, obey, obey or die.
Approach a pothole at 30mph. It is unavoidable. If you brake hard you may lose control in the gravel thrown up out of the hole. If you are unable to blip the throttle to lighten the front wheel , you are possibly slamming into the hole and flying through the air to land hard ,head first or into an oncoming vehicle.
To corner safely around a corner requires for acceleration on the exit from the corner to lift the bike upright.
The thing is with this, it would never work.
You get the problem with avoiding stuff, sometimes you need to speed up to avoid an accident.
The only thing this will do is cause more accidents, so if they actually do it.
It would get reverted later on.
Maybe that's why somebikes use ride by wire throttle to make it easeyer to fit speed limiters
I have sat nav that gives alarm when speeding near speed cameras, theres a spot on motorway in Manchester which confuses sat nav and I'm getting alarm says 30 pmh and 40mph this is on motorway with 70 mph limit, I have to switch if off
I got my first bike a month ago. 2024 Husqvarna Svartpilen 125. It's a nice bike with lots of tech features. One of which is the speed limiter that lets you set a maximum speed limit for the bike while you are learning which makes some sense, but I ended up turning it off completely after the second week as I didn't need it. The bike also has turn by turn navigation but that is controlled through the phone which is paired to it. I would imagine eventually it will get built in as standard as a convenience feature at first, then it will get linked up to the speed limiter to automatically control the bikes speed depending on the road you are on.
A system using cameras wouldn't be reliable enough, as signs can be obscured by trees and bushes as it is, or dirt and bugs on the camera etc.
I'm thinking my next bike will be an air/oil cooled Royal Enfield with no tech at all lol.
Y'know how there's roads where the speed limit changes every blink of an eye? 40 60 30 60 20 60 30 50 20 50 30 :)
Sounds very fun! :)
Most people in built up areas of wales have settled on around 25mph, they won’t do 20, if the Welsh government had made it 25 I don’t think many would grumble because in my area that’s about all you can do with the volume of traffic, they got greedy though and went for 20 turning thousands into law breakers over night.
They can be turned off and this law is why ride by wire is becoming so common as without this they can't reduce speed electronically
A guy at work was telling me his car wont allow him to change lane unless he indicators. It will force the car back into lane. Why anyone buys these things is beyond me.
Things I wonder about are, why even make any performance vehicle when they are all limited. With all these cameras to see road signs how long before they have ANPR cameras built in and flagging anyone going a bit too fast. Or even reports the driver if they switch it off and go at speed.
Yes indeed, why make performance cars? Perhaps performance cars could be commuter cars on public roads and then be performance cars on private roads. Wouldn't that be safer?
@@langhamp8912 safer how? it doesn't stop people driving drunk or distracted, pulling out of junctions without looking, running reds crashing into another road user at 60mph on a country lane is still dangerous.
@@SloboloboVFR Driving a car seems really dangerous for those points that you mentioned.
Perhaps I misspoke. Why make such a dangerous form of transportation in the first place? Perhaps we should only allow drivers who can guarantee that they will never drive drunk or distracted, pull out of junctions without looking, run reds, or otherwise crash into another road user.
Not buying a new car, until aftermarket ECUs outside of EU come out. Common EU L.
I'd like to go on a ride out with you dude. I'm from the same area. Got my full licence recently and have started out on a 2009 Ninja 250R. 👍
So let me get this right … speed is bad yet multi entertainment menu systems to change the temp or put the lights on are good ??? I’m guessing the folks in wales with speed limiters and 20mph limits will live forever and there should NEVER EVER BE ANOTHER ROAD INCIDENT 👍
great logic to disprove this actually, yea people do still be crashing at 20 cuz theyre so distacted now a days. When you have to wip out an ipad to turn your wipers on things get messy
How are you meant to overtake people then 😂
Im a good driver, I dont speed for like 95% of my driving. So why do I have to now be punished if I want a new car? so they think controlling speed will stop crashes?? stupid idea, both my crashes have been from people being distracted and loosing control of their vehicles. First guy was not driving appropriately for road conditions, didnt see my coming down the single lane country road which I had pulled over and slowed ( i was goin 50-60 prior to seeing him and managed to get to either 5mph or stopped before the collision, so speed wasnt the concern) and the other driver rear ended my car at 30mph (the speed limit) cuz I'm going to assume he was on his phone or distracted by smth so he didnt slow at all untill he used my car as a stopping point.
so if these collions were both with new vehicles with speed limiters, both these crashes would have still happend?? someone tell me if im yapping and salty or if im onto smth here cuz I really don't see how they can think this works. Lets make the Ipads in cars illegal and not penalize people for speeding within 10%+2 like the rule is normally. If I have to be checking my speed 24/7 im going to be taking my eyes off the road which could lead to me missing someone breaking at 70mph on the motorway. cuz I looked away for 2 seconds every 5 seconds.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the speed assist system will warn by way of several possible ways, then if you continue to ignore it then it will reduce your vehicle to the limit, however you can over ride it by pressing the accelerator down, and that's aside from the on/off button, however I believe that the ability to turn it off will be removed after a couple of years, but the technology which they are using is not great, cams to read speed signs which can and do mis read, GPS which will be used to know where the vehicle is and in what speed zone, I seriously doubt that it will be feasible or practical for motorcycles for a long time if ever 🤷🏻♂️
And how many people complaining see a semi truck that is limited, do not see what happened.. little steps first semis, then small vehicles
Unfortunately next would be the police and government will be able to shut your car off or limit use at will. This is a dangerous step forward in my opinion.. and nothing good will come of it.
And this is I won't buy/own new vehicles!
I'll keep my 80s & 90s cars & bikes, thanks!
I already give my bike time to warm up before I ride. Plenty of time to switch off/on electronic systems.
Goblin I've done further research on this subject and to yours and other relief this law is going to be passed in northern Ireland and the rest of the EU excluding England
here its hobby vehicle so no. We dont have any of those laws that rest of europe seems to force on bikes. It can be loud and as fast as it can be since its only a hobby vehicle like boats. There is no taxes or anything.
Riding earlier and for no reason on a national speed limit road a car decided to do more than the speed limit. Fine i guess but he was the tail end of 6 closely bunched cars and so he overtook 1 hopped back in and then a mile or so later overtook the remaining cars and sped off. The cars was already doing the speed limit and didnt need to be any quicker its reasons like that, that the government wants these laws and changes as he could of possibly taken those cars out or cars coming towards him which many did will he was doing such a manoeuvre.
It has nothing to do with saving anyone and everything to do with control and getting more money out of you. If you think for one second it's to with safety then there is no helping you I'm afraid.
Enfield bullet for the win!!! 😀
The limiter device will be put in all cars made in Europe, however, yes the cars that are imported into the UK will have it, do you think European manufacturers are going to make cars bound for the UK without the device or do you think it’s more cost effective that every car has the limiter fitted but not activated in the UK. Scare story 🙄🥴
This is true which sucks but it's not true that you won't be able to go any faster. Currently you can over ride the speed limiter by pushing down on the throttle pedal more. Although obviously this may change in the future, which sucks even more.
I actually was renting one of this cars
It was a wv golf 7
I was cruising on motorway on cruise control at 130km/h and suddenly the limit was on 80 and the car started breaking down to 80 almost creating a accident with the cars behind me
Is the worst think and more dangerous than you having full control over it
Don't buy them
I have read, that in the majority of road traffic collisions, all party's involved are within the permitted speed limit... Let's face it, u can't just measure road safety in mph... If u don't want a vehicle that has a limiter like this, then never buy one.
I think it’s a TERRIBLE idea and I agree the 2nd hand bikes / cars will become sought after and new ones less so. Maybe it’s part of the agenda. Slow or stop sales of new vehicles and put people off private vehicle ownership. The implications of a sudden, or even gentle, loss of power in a turn when leaning is not good. Even if it “waits” till your upright to slow you it will slow you more from a potential higher speed. It’s maybe a symptom of this 15 minute city project. You will own nothing and be happy… clous shwarb. I’m hopeful there’s more of “us” than them and that public resistance can stop or reverse it like the 20mph wales debacle. Great great video btw 👍🏻
12:45 a tin foil hat perspective is that cutting the source of personal transport by destroying these manufacturers is in part the goal.
It's about control and not saving people
These limiters are not going to slow the car, it's simply going to nag you when you ignore the speed limit, it's just going to be like Lane keep assist, you can turn it off every time you start the car.
Alcatraz island
This video is a bit off putting. It's already in effect in europe, but they cannot possibly make it so it cuts your power after X limit. The way it works is that it makes annoying sounds, for safety alone they cannot cut your engine power. As for bikes, well bikes do not have the technology to read the roda signs and adjust their speed, with the exception of Goldwings some high end BMWs and HDs. For bikes it will most likely have a power cutoff which can be ECU removed with 50 euros to any garage. Here in Czechia for example Honda and Kawasaki remove the restrictions if you have an A category license.
First comes the softly, softly...
this is so stupid what if you're in a emergancy and need to get somewhere or you need to rescue someone. its stupid
They people bringing these rules dont drive or ride.
I didn't watch your entire video but I am massively in favour of these devices and have been wondering why all vehicles haven't had something like this for a couple of decades now. These devices will save tens of thousands of lives globally every year. As far as I can see, the only reason anyone can have for NOT liking these devices is because they regularly break the speed limit. People like myself who drive according to the law will not notice any change. In fact, it will assist them in driving safely. The next steps I would like to see are mandatory front and back dashcams, automated minimum distance managers and your car automatically informing the police and your insurance company when you break the law. Excessive speed is one of the major factors in the vast majority of accidents. If you had been driving the way you were taught to, these devices would be unnecessary. You are the architects of your own misery.
15 min cities...
Nah! Restricting a bike's speed will directly affect it's stability and balance. If you're leaning into a turn, and expecting a certain power input, anything else will screw-up the manoeuvre, and cause an incident. Speed restricting motorcycles is an non-starter, and they know it.
Fortunately it is NOT coming to great Britain, at least for now.
It is happening in Northern Ireland and of course would also need to be introduced to Scotland if they vote for separation from England and Wales and rejoin the EUROPEAN union.
Does anyone else think that the 'safer' and 'better' cars become the worse people's driving is?
AND young men will defeat the mecanism.
no point buying a new car car sales will flop.but that is what the wef etc want
If the bikes get speed limiters i’am out of the game and i think track days are going to rocket in price. They dont want people to have fun prediction 1984 is were we’re going.
It's about control power
Could you do more research before spreading false information? This is related to the fact cars are to be fitted with the limiter function like most cars with cruise control already have. It's not to make the limiter automatically pick up signposted speeds etc. Limiters are pushed heavily during speed awareness classes to avoid "accidental" speed creeping over. The government think if this feature is available on all cars produced after the date of the bill (no retrofitting) then it will reduce speeding and those caught speeding with the feature can have the book thrown at them.
This cant be real 😂
It all about controlling every aspect of your life. When are we gonna grow a pair as a country and say no there just determined to take all the fun out of life
Can you imagine just getting down onto the apex of a corner and it decides your speed is slightly over the limit and power down, you will go down yourself i kniw this loss of power into a corner is very dangerous because i have once missed a gear goin into a corner and without traction i almost fell off. And besides why the hell are we still following the EU laws, what happened to Brexit, i want our laws only.
i think the video itself is well rounded however, the fact when you complain about speedlimits and being upset about the repercussions of breaking the speed limit in limited zones baffles me? If you're over the limit then you're over the limit even if it's 2mph or 10. you're knowingly going over it and you're taking the risk of that.
I'm not saying people don't and shouldn't speed but you can't complain about it if you get yourself an SP30 or an SP50 for either road or motorway speeds. Is it just speed where you draw the line or is it okay to also be slightly over the drink limit or drug driving?
The roads themselves are limited in towns and cities where footpaths and traffic could cause injury or damage should you not be able to stop fast enough or roadside hazard such as parked cars, T juctions, driveways and the sorts.
I'm not bashing the video but this part particually irked me - good video overall though
Got 2024 car have to take speed notice and lane assist every time I drive it have to turn it off glad i have motorbikes
In Northern Ireland the speed limiter has to be turned on by law.
In coming subscription services.
I feel this is a very interesting topic that has a lot of moral implications, which i think this video is incapable of addressing and the audience incapable of engaging, mostly.
@ironzombi Let's engage then, enlighten me on topics that I haven't discussed, or are incapable of engaging in?
@@snakeman9902 one, I said mostly but most people are incapable of seeing past their own selfish "rights" and appear incapable of steel man'ing the other side, two most are also unwilling to focus on the specific issue and use it to make a statement regarding the ulterior motive. Read the comments, try to even consider the other side even if you are completely opposed. I do not even support it.
@ironzombi One... you never said mostly in your above post.
Two, most are unwilling , that is very subjective, and it is a bold presumption, just like you saying I should consider the other side. You don't really know what or where I consider..
I am happy to engage with you. So let's engage. Don't tell me your presumptions about other people. Put your attitude under your hat for a mo and your ego,speak to me like a person, (without the obnoxious attitude), and tell me your thoughts and what you believe about the situation .
I like to look at all options, and I'm willing to consider yours..
The floor is open,
I'm very curious how they are going to defend having our lives controlled completely for the better good...
We're already halfway there, and it sucks, so why would the other 50% suddenly create a utopia?
When has quality of life ever improved alongside growth in government? Name one government in world history to have never been corrupted??
Or are you talking out of your arse?
@@snakeman9902 I didn't say mostly in my above post...ok
1. Classic cars > modern cars
2. 90% of modern technology in cars is pointless, expensive, and fragile.
3. This not only applies to cars, but also, technologies usefulness peaked a while ago and now is regressing for the sake of progress.
Lastly, if you're still obeying and supporting the people in government, then you deserve what you get.
more excuses to keep buying classics, my 2004 Z4 are gonna continue existing without such a silly restriction
Sucks to be a Brit huh?
The government is totally right. if speeding vehicles are banned there are no traffic casualties anymore. just like, when they banned weapons in the uk, there was not a single homicide case ever since.
You really think you can't die from a crash at 50 60 or 70 mph lol
@@joef1110 are you trolling?
@@asdfjkl981 no you are or you don't understand anything
@@asdfjkl981 don't worry bro I will educate you for free here is a statistics report I found - However, at 50 mph, the survival rate drops to about 31%
@@asdfjkl981dip shit
They saved every one with the vaccine. Safe and effective 😂
There is another problem with these tactics that are dumbing down the act of driving makes drivers distracted. Because you don't have to keep an eye on speed and you're going slow the drive is not engaging. This makes the drivers attention wonder and ultimately will make the drivers more dangerous not safer.
If you want to make the driver engaged, then remove things like red lights, stop signs, road markings, pedestrian crossings, and anything else that allows you to turn off your brain. Then throw in the occasional obstacle like a couch or a potted plant in the middle of the road, along with concrete barriers and bollards that will destroy your car if your mind wanders.
Drivers are dangerous because they want to go just fast enough to still be safe. So, remove everything that makes drivers feel safe. For instance, remove all airbags and safety devices, crumple zones, ABS, and so on. I'd bet then drivers would concentrate a bit more than they do now.
@@langhamp8912 I have a simpler idea, remove insurance!! people drive like freaks cuz they know if they crash into you they can just lie get a 50/50 claim and things will be ripe as rain for them again. So many drivers who will try punish you by offensively driving when you make a mistake and in nice fancy cars too. It gives people to much comfort.
@@MrDylanButton People with insurance are less likely to be in a wreck than those without insurance. There's an avalanche of evidence showing so, but the reason why is postulated as people who don't have much concern for others and themselves will drive without much care.
What I think would work better in reducing wrecks is to simply remove all safety features from cars, and place a spike in the center of the steering wheel pointed directly at the driver's heart. A collision with anything would then drive the spike through the driver. Thus, drivers would (usually) drive with the utmost care, while those who didn't would be quickly eliminated from driving.
@@langhamp8912 I would also imagine people with out insurence don't have mot or a license so there could defiantly be other factors effecting that. if i lost my insurence tommrow I wouldn't be driving like a freak. quite the opposite, I'd be driving extra safe cuz I'm currently driving around thousands of pounds
@@MrDylanButton Credit score is highly correlated with traffic wrecks. People with the lowest credit scores are most likely to wreck, which is ironic given they're the most likely to not have insurance.
speed limiters have been proven they are very dangerous on a bike
With Brexit we went from being part of the biggest trading block in the world to living next door to it. Even if you don't like the EU you're still better off in it than out of it, a concept the brexiteers failed to grasp. The issue in point, we would have had a veto to stop compulsory speed limiters for example. The fact that the UK is in favour of them so wouldn't have vetoed them is beside the point. The same will be the case for everything else the EU does, we have lost our seat at the table so instead of 'taking back control', we have totally lost it.
Except your missing the point not being in the EU mean we don’t have to do any of this 🐂💩 if only our politicians had some ⚽️s
@@richob2714That's an argument I've heard a thousand times. It's not as simple as that I'm afraid.
Favorite oute because it's stupid 😂
It is not coming into the UK, it is only being implemented in Europe, also whilst your talking about speed limiters, take a look at your own videos and the amount of times you go over a 40mph sign at 50 mph plus 🤦♂️🤦♂️
"and the amount of times you go over a 40mph sign at 50 mph plus" - Goodness gracious me! Such dispicable behaviour!
I say, old chap, have you reported this miscreant's vile traffic offences to the constables yet? Make haste, make haste!!!
I love driving. Who the hell voted labour??? Don't car and bike enthusiasts understand what they are doing to our hobby?
It's all boring EVs soon.
LOL. Most people won't be able to afford to drive at all.
Labour/conservative/Dem/Rep. All sides of the same coin, makes no difference.
The inevitable pending recession will be blamed on labour _(and their __-liberal-__ corporate centrist agenda)_ in the UK, likley on Trump in the US. Then you can have your switch backs.
@alivekicking6247 It wasn't a vote for Labour, but a vote against Rishi.
@@snakeman9902 and you got Labour ... Well done
@@alivekicking6247 Not well done, I never voted them scum bags, I see the difference, most clearly did not, or didn't vote..
Different cheeks on the same a££ and both spew sh1t..
It sounds like motorbikes will be forced to be slower than cyclists and there's nothing they can do about it
God created Eastern Europeans as a contingency agains exactly this kind of thing.
Keep your opinions to yourself and comply 🤦
I think a dystopian future is when perfect strangers get enraged at each other's driving, and that they drive machines that bring a mortal danger to wherever they go. That'd be pretty sick for a society to prioritize speed over safety, huh?
Stop speeding then . You brought this on yourselves .
Just because you can't save everyone doesn't mean it's not a good idea to have safety measures in place to save a good amount of people. seat belts dont save everyone but they are still a good idea. you can die in a motorcycle crash while wearing a helmet, doesn't mean you shouldn't wear one. You say when you enter your car or get on your bike you're accepting risk, sure but why can't we bring that risk down? Also, someone just trying to get to work shouldn't have to accept the same risk as a shitty bmw driver speeding and overtaking on corners. look at 90% of car crash videos and it involves someone crashing or hitting or killing another person. You're not the only person on the road or street. if you want to take that risk for your self go to a track. The reason 30 is 30 is because of the way the road and street are designed. a motorway and a residential street are completely different roads. driving fast is cool but it's not a right.
Just keep everyone in doors, I'm sure you can avoid a lot of risk to life that way.
@@bearwolffish Okay im going to assume you are not retarded but I think you understand where im coming from. If you've got a cut on your hand and I say dont go touching anything dirty, im not saying chuck you in a closed environment ball for the rest of your life just so you dont get infected. You're just being bad faith.
@@bearwolffish Im going to assume you're not stupid but I think you understand what im saying. If I never wash my hands after I shit and someone says I should they're not saying I should seal myself in a medical ball for the rest of my life all they're saying is I should practice basic hygiene. You're just being bad faith.
Does everyone remember the other good idea the took from the cars years ago and the biking community went mad and rightly so, remember the seatbelt and the cartoons in MCN of bikers in the tree with a bike hanging round his neck. Trouble with cars is when people pass there car test they can go of into the nissan shop and get a gtr animal and they struggle to handle the power of a micra.