Explained: The most misunderstood twist in the charges against Donald Trump

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024
  • The jury in Donald Trump's hush money criminal trial in New York have to ask themselves a series of questions on their way to arriving at a verdict in the case, with the final step being less prescribed than many people are accustomed to seeing, and consequently a lot of people are misunderstanding how it works. MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin and former prosecutor Duncan Levin explain why it's simpler than it sounds.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/...
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/...
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #Trump #jury #hushmoney

КОМЕНТАРІ • 447

  • @wkzeier
    @wkzeier 5 місяців тому +25

    Thank you. Your explanation of the charges and the deliberation process is best I’ve seen so far. 💎

  • @Columbiastargazer
    @Columbiastargazer 5 місяців тому +189

    trump isn't arguing he's innocent, he's arguing he has the right to be a criminal

    • @williamroyer4669
      @williamroyer4669 5 місяців тому +16

      Obviously, Donald has a limited vocabulary to argue with 😂

    • @Rs-bm1gy
      @Rs-bm1gy 5 місяців тому +10

      Well he's been at it for decades, so....

    • @nicolaasstempels8207
      @nicolaasstempels8207 5 місяців тому +4

      He argues both.

    • @aja342
      @aja342 5 місяців тому +2

      That TDS fever has given you hallucinations.

    • @kenc7120
      @kenc7120 5 місяців тому +3

      Nobody cares. America wants Trump. Say NO to Sloppy joe.

  • @stop_lying_to_me
    @stop_lying_to_me 5 місяців тому +100

    20 years ago, that's the last time a Republican presidential candidate has won the popular vote.

    • @miguelpaul1164
      @miguelpaul1164 5 місяців тому

      They steal supreme court seats too. Then their stolen court says they can steal Congress too.

    • @kelperdude
      @kelperdude 5 місяців тому +11

      joes 40 year high inflation will change that.

    • @andrewstevenson118
      @andrewstevenson118 5 місяців тому

      Yeah, without the EC the Republicans would have a hard time winning.

    • @sassysaint3096
      @sassysaint3096 5 місяців тому +22

      ​@@kelperdude👈
      Takes his Kool-aid intravenously.

    • @mkskupa
      @mkskupa 5 місяців тому +7

      @@sassysaint3096 And probably pays Von Schitzinpants for the honor. 🤣🤣

  • @sylviaburns2995
    @sylviaburns2995 5 місяців тому +63

    It Does NOT matter that trump WAS A FORMER PRESIDENT IF THE UNITED STATES!!! trump IS "DEFENDANT" trump in this trial!!!

    • @starradelowokan7843
      @starradelowokan7843 5 місяців тому

      This is the proof under a conspiracy that he scammed his way into the white House or he woulda never been a president and we never woulda had the Trump or maga years infecting our government.

    • @andercoyote4170
      @andercoyote4170 5 місяців тому +5

      He is CITIZEN now.

    • @peterwainwright5994
      @peterwainwright5994 5 місяців тому +2

      Agree! if he's a John Doe its a slam dunk!!....if they give the ex president deference, the law could fail!!

    • @fightfish3265
      @fightfish3265 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@peterwainwright5994*sigh
      Be careful what you wish for...

    • @fightfish3265
      @fightfish3265 5 місяців тому

      How does section 17-152 NOT affect Biden???
      It doesnt........... yet.
      Political Persecution is a thing.

  • @sherrillsturm7240
    @sherrillsturm7240 5 місяців тому +36

    I find violating the tax law to be a no-brainer. Deductions of business expense need to be business expenses. Nothing deducted on the taxes was a legitimate cost of doing business. Fraud.

    • @MadCatLady28
      @MadCatLady28 5 місяців тому +4

      Just as easy to determine was violating the $2700 campaign finance contribution.

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 5 місяців тому +5

      @@heemlo649The deduction was in Donald Trump’s company’s NY and Federal tax returns.

    • @cenauge
      @cenauge 5 місяців тому

      Yeah, I was surprised that commentators were talking about the tax fraud as if it was weak because Cohen was paying more tax than necessary (repayment disguised as income requires income and other taxes be paid) but legal services for a business can often be tax deductible and I would be shocked if Trump didn't claim the fees as deductible.

    • @MadCatLady28
      @MadCatLady28 5 місяців тому +6

      @@heemlo649 oh ffs, if it's claimed as an expense (which legal fees are) it's deducted. That's accounting 101 stuff.

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 5 місяців тому

      @@heemlo649 Different crime Donald Trump has already been found guilty of (two months ago). The falsified ledgers were part of the Trump Organisation’s tax filings.

  • @KYGELLE
    @KYGELLE 5 місяців тому +57

    GUILTY & PRISON.

    • @jonathandnicholson
      @jonathandnicholson 5 місяців тому +5

      Not guilty and no prison.

    • @LiftUpNotDown
      @LiftUpNotDown 5 місяців тому

      @@jonathandnicholson 😂 good comeback MAGA cult member. How much of your pay check are your sending to pay for Trump’s legal fees? 😂

    • @jonathandnicholson
      @jonathandnicholson 5 місяців тому

      @sophiaestella5611 Tell me is the Donald J Trump Revocable Trust an enterprise?

    • @fightfish3265
      @fightfish3265 5 місяців тому +1

      I hope you never try to run a business in New York....
      By the way, Trump will still win the Presidency.... even from a cell.

  • @katherineweber8955
    @katherineweber8955 5 місяців тому +6

    Thank you for this clarity!

  • @mattallen5803
    @mattallen5803 5 місяців тому +4

    This just made me leave the democratic party. I am now republican

    • @WayneRoberts-x7l
      @WayneRoberts-x7l 3 місяці тому

      No great loss be prepared for frumpy loss in November

    • @nickigmiro5174
      @nickigmiro5174 15 днів тому

      @@WayneRoberts-x7lTell me who lost again? 😂😂😂🖕🏾

    • @leiffriedline4628
      @leiffriedline4628 15 днів тому +1

      @@WayneRoberts-x7lhow you feeling now?

  • @PatrioticUSAmerican
    @PatrioticUSAmerican 5 місяців тому +5

    ALL BOGUS CHARGES!!! 😡😡😡😡😡

  • @beckyplinke5446
    @beckyplinke5446 4 місяці тому +1

    Corruption at its best

  • @frankstollar8492
    @frankstollar8492 5 місяців тому +16

    I am again and again amazed how bad the US justice system is.
    The jury does not have a written copy of ALL instructions and ALL evidence presented but they must remember all by memory!?
    Are you joking!

    • @jacobbaran
      @jacobbaran 5 місяців тому

      You should be more amazed by how uninformed you are. Nobody said they have to "do it all by memory". That was your stupidity showing.

    • @karenferrell-white5387
      @karenferrell-white5387 5 місяців тому

      They can, and did, ask for a repeat for some or all the directions. It might be better that they have someone familiar with legalese read the directions to them, rather than their arguing during their deliberations about what some segment of the directions (and potentially wasting a lot of time).

    • @jacobbaran
      @jacobbaran 5 місяців тому +2

      @@karenferrell-white5387 that's just it. The law in New York is so any questions regarding instructions go to the judge, the person who wrote them. Versus jorurs with no legal knowledge making their own interpretation and debating amongst themselves.
      People that pretend not to understand this are just making excuses and spreading lies.

    • @karenferrell-white5387
      @karenferrell-white5387 5 місяців тому

      @@jacobbaran Exactly.

    • @fredscott3408
      @fredscott3408 5 місяців тому

      You have been watching the wrong trials or blatantly missing the jury requests.

  • @Sarcasticron
    @Sarcasticron 5 місяців тому +2

    Great show, as always, and really good guests. Thanks for explaining the Choose Your Own Adventure, and why they didn't get a copy of the instructions.

  • @heatherholden3774
    @heatherholden3774 5 місяців тому +2

    It’s ridiculous that they don’t get the instructions. They always get them where I live in Texas.

  • @CavemanVanDweller
    @CavemanVanDweller 5 місяців тому +3

    While you're all doing this you forgot to charge him with a crime!!! 🤦🏾‍♂️

    • @jrrarglblarg9241
      @jrrarglblarg9241 5 місяців тому

      Joined Jul 22, 2023 Isn’t a crime, but IS an indicator on the Obvious🐿Chipmunk Checklist.

    • @CavemanVanDweller
      @CavemanVanDweller 5 місяців тому +3

      So it's like pick a crime any crime?

  • @sandyjack1901
    @sandyjack1901 5 місяців тому +24

    Let’s hope that “Bone Spurs” don’t stop him from going to jail

    • @afry6400
      @afry6400 5 місяців тому +2

      Doubtful but his age might earn him some sympathy by the courts. I'd hope not. breaking laws is breaking laws no matter what the law breakers station in life is. Justice matters.

  • @repeat_defender
    @repeat_defender 5 місяців тому +9

    if i were chosen for jury duty, put on a jury, went through the entire trial, and then told in deliberation i would have to just remember 53 pages of instructions in order to make a decision about someone’s freedom, i would freak out! i’m not capable of retaining that kind of information, and the whole thing just seems insane to me. how is that a thing?

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому

      poor baby.

    • @Sarcasticron
      @Sarcasticron 5 місяців тому

      @@davidcleveland-yv6my What a strange response. You sound like a person who is very young.

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому

      @@Sarcasticron at heart

    • @ROCKY-w5r
      @ROCKY-w5r 5 місяців тому +1

      Those instructions seems like the jurors are righting doctorate exams😂

    • @cs4201
      @cs4201 5 місяців тому

      It definitely fits with the rest of the trial shenanigans

  • @cultureal9544
    @cultureal9544 5 місяців тому +8

    Well, Senior gave that story about Ted Cruz's dad to prevent ted cruz from becoming potus potential

  • @JohnDJr1975
    @JohnDJr1975 5 місяців тому +12

    Well explained. Looking forward to Trump losing, again

    • @genghiskhan5158
      @genghiskhan5158 5 місяців тому +1

      Donald Trump has already won the election 😊

  • @janwoodworth1
    @janwoodworth1 5 місяців тому +11

    I'm shocked the guy who cheated on Eric's mom with Tiffany's mom and then cheated on her mom with the woman he cheated on in this case wasn't more warm and fuzzy.

    • @LL-vk9zc
      @LL-vk9zc 5 місяців тому +2

      This is the core of the guy's beliefs - he does whatever he wants without any consequence to him.

    • @FieldBlaser
      @FieldBlaser 5 місяців тому

      Seems like the perfect candidate for Putler. Trump is the Antichrist.

  • @Canigetanawwwwyyyyeeeah
    @Canigetanawwwwyyyyeeeah 5 місяців тому +3

    If 17-152 is being brought into play….why isn’t the ENTIRE democrats party up in the dock…..???😂 ah double standards…love em. Trump will still win

  • @FyaaahS
    @FyaaahS 5 місяців тому +2

    "Conspiracy to prevent election" you say..... ??? What is happening to Trump in this moment right now?

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому

      Exactly! The only thing that makes pain, stormy and falsifying the business records a crime is if he did it to cover up another crime. But then the jury instructions say that they don’t have to agree on what that second crime is. That is completely an absolutely absurd. That’s never going to, hold up in appeal. This is obvious that they had to literally tie themselves in a pretzel and do some major gymnastics to create this into a crime. Otherwise, it was an expired misdemeanor end of story. That’s exactly what they’re doing right now. Exactly what they’re accusing him of is what they’re doing Marxist 101 communism 101. Do what you’re accusing the other guy of doing

  • @Clifftowers
    @Clifftowers 5 місяців тому +2

    We don't know wat was unlawful it just has to be unlawful in their head?

  • @lalah9481
    @lalah9481 5 місяців тому +9

    Why in the world wouldn’t the jury have those instructions in the deliberation room???
    We had them for a state superior court case here in Cali… our decision was based on the EXACT wording of the instruction.

    • @jennaxoxox4821
      @jennaxoxox4821 5 місяців тому +5

      Weird quirk of NY law.

    • @smilingfox8978
      @smilingfox8978 5 місяців тому +5

      ​@jennaxoxox4821 some of us are auditory learners and some are visual. Time for NY to change this rule.

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому +1

      must be to prevent one juror coloring or parsing down evidence? maybe?

    • @ROCKY-w5r
      @ROCKY-w5r 5 місяців тому +2

      Those instructions seems like the jurors are righting doctorate exams😂

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому +1

      @@ROCKY-w5r nah...probly wronging em....huh huh...get it huh?

  • @PeteJenks-z7u
    @PeteJenks-z7u 5 місяців тому +1

    And this is what America has become!!

  • @AutumnAspens68
    @AutumnAspens68 5 місяців тому +2

    Soo what was he convicted of?

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому

      Apparently, they didn’t have to agree on what he was guilty of. Because it can only be a crime if he falsified business records in attempt to hide another crime. But they say the jury doesn’t have to agree on what the second crime was. None of that makes sense. Like he gave the example of murder. The jury in a murder trial saying he’s guilty of murder but we don’t agree on the weapon used. Now, how would that work? That makes absolutely zero sense. Every trial, you have to agree on both that a crime was committed, what the crime was & the means of the crime. They can’t say it was three different crimes that he tried to cover up. It has to be unanimous. Especially because this whole case is contingent on, it can only be a crime if he was covering up a second crime. This judge gave incorrect jury instruction because they knew there would not be a unanimous verdict. To me this just shows the corruption that’s involved in this case.

  • @TeddyCavachon
    @TeddyCavachon 5 місяців тому +2

    I served on the jury of a civil damages case and volunteered to be foreperson because I had a lot of experience facilitating meetings and finding consensus solutions to problems. My guess is that in this case one of the two lawyers on the jury was elected foreperson and will be able to lead the jury to a consensus agreement on verdicts on the 34 counts.

  • @yaakw
    @yaakw 5 місяців тому +7

    Sounds like “Guilty!” To moi.

  • @maggiereeder7121
    @maggiereeder7121 5 місяців тому +4

    Dear Lisa Rubin, I wish you could draw us the diagram of the crime! 🙋‍♀️😁❤

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому

      she could put it into pictures for you if that would help. emojis perhaps?

    • @Sue-u6z
      @Sue-u6z 5 місяців тому

      No one can figure out what the supposed "crime" is.

  • @generalbiochemistryi8498
    @generalbiochemistryi8498 5 місяців тому +5

    Hey all. Just found a fly in the ointment. ALL of the underlying "crimes" in the trial were ALSO OUTSIDE OF THEIR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. So legally they cannot be used to elevate the alleged misdemeanors to felonies. And the misdemeanors are time barred SO the WHOLE CASE IS MOOT!

  • @timelapsetv3869
    @timelapsetv3869 5 місяців тому +2

    Liberal crazies will cry in November.

    • @RodgerHammond-z6l
      @RodgerHammond-z6l 5 місяців тому

      Nice try, Traitor! Is your name Vladimir?

    • @timelapsetv3869
      @timelapsetv3869 5 місяців тому

      @@RodgerHammond-z6l Hold your horses its not yet November! MAGA TRUMP 2024 A woman is an adult female lol

  • @ROCKY-w5r
    @ROCKY-w5r 5 місяців тому +2

    Lisa rubin really working overtime

  • @spankyssurprise1361
    @spankyssurprise1361 5 місяців тому +2

    The biggest twist is how they took a misdemeanor that the statute of limitations has run out on and morphed it into a federal crime.

  • @miguelpaul1164
    @miguelpaul1164 5 місяців тому +28

    Orange narcissist with 🐷 👀

    • @dianepanfil7297
      @dianepanfil7297 5 місяців тому +1

      Still better than BUYden!

    • @holymoley1920
      @holymoley1920 5 місяців тому

      @@dianepanfil7297 In what way is trump good for anybody other than Putin, Kim Jong Un, and the filthy-rich far right movers and shakers running (or rather, preventing the running) of the US?

    • @gregdrew874
      @gregdrew874 5 місяців тому

      @@dianepanfil7297 Yer mother wasn't better than Biden....

    • @snowyowel7961
      @snowyowel7961 5 місяців тому +1

      Get rid of slow bad- en
      🇺🇸 TRUMP 🇺🇸
      🎉 ❤ 🎉

    • @FieldBlaser
      @FieldBlaser 5 місяців тому

      Better than Biden only if you’re brainwashed by Qanon Russian propaganda/Fox news. Putler helped him in 2016 because he’s a Russian asset. The antichrist.

  • @lancedominguez6071
    @lancedominguez6071 5 місяців тому +1

    This really does not do a good job explaining it...

  • @miguelpaul1164
    @miguelpaul1164 5 місяців тому +13

    Meanwhile, at compensation- for- mushroom-stump-tower, Waltine Nauta is changing the diapers again!!! Toooo much McDonald's!!! Stinky don!! Sleepy don. Nap time

    • @bullpup4014
      @bullpup4014 5 місяців тому

      Diapers Don, biggest looser !!

  • @Jesus_equals_LOVEnForgviness
    @Jesus_equals_LOVEnForgviness 5 місяців тому +4

    They're expected to memorize 55 pages of instructions? Why don't they get a copy, that makes no sense.

  • @CitizenLarente
    @CitizenLarente 5 місяців тому +1

    Guilty...

  • @jeffreyliddicoat1364
    @jeffreyliddicoat1364 5 місяців тому +14

    If trump is found guilty he should be held in jail until he can post bail for an appeal ... bail set at 500 million after all he is a billionaire

    • @cs4201
      @cs4201 5 місяців тому

      I am sure New Yorkers would appreciate the violent criminals and all the thieves running around the city without bail....oh wait. They vote for that type of corruption. This is why New York is finished unless TRUMP wins in November. Then even though they may not deserve it...he will fix the sh*$ show New York has become.

    • @Idekreally
      @Idekreally 5 місяців тому +4

      Y’all really hate this man so much you’re willing to forgo the constitution 😂

  • @Stevie671
    @Stevie671 5 місяців тому +3

    What I'm getting out of this is it would be very difficult to argue that Trump was innocent.

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому

      That’s the same thing I’m getting out of this. And the jury instructions are bogus anyways, because they have to be unanimous in the charge & the reason. They can’t just be unanimous in the fact that it was a crime they have to be unanimous on the reason for the crime. Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense you can’t say he was guilty but say you don’t agree on what crime was committed. That would never get through an appeal. Just like the example he was giving what weapon was used in a murder. So the jury says they agree he committed a murder, but they disagree on the weapon used that would never fly in a criminal conviction. Never. So he’s proving how ridiculous this is in his own example.

  • @diligentmindz
    @diligentmindz 5 місяців тому +27

    What on earth did he do to get skin like that?! For someone who claims to be teetotal he sure looks like a heavy drinker!

    • @miguelpaul1164
      @miguelpaul1164 5 місяців тому

      Pig eyes.

    • @yaakw
      @yaakw 5 місяців тому +2

      Bronzer they say

    • @rcpilot179
      @rcpilot179 5 місяців тому +6

      A lifetime of fast food and zero physical exertion. He thinks riding in a golf cart is exercise.

    • @martin2289
      @martin2289 5 місяців тому +2

      Trump apparently has some pretty wacky ideas about how the human body works. For example, that everyone has a finite store of "energy" as if we're all some kind of walking battery.

    • @DaveP102
      @DaveP102 5 місяців тому

      Decades of drug use, will do that to you.
      Remember him and Ronnie Jackson turned the WH into a pill mill. Some amphetamines were dispensed by the thousands along with opioids and pain killers.

  • @patcomerford5596
    @patcomerford5596 5 місяців тому +4

    This is my only criticism of Judge Merchan. I believe he could allow a copy of the jury instructions in the deliberating room.

    • @Sarcasticron
      @Sarcasticron 5 місяців тому +4

      I believe he's just following a pre-existing law.

    • @jend.1069
      @jend.1069 5 місяців тому +4

      Omg...he can't break the law , it could cause a mistrial!!!!!

    • @cenauge
      @cenauge 5 місяців тому +2

      If the jury has a question about the instructions, it's better for them to ask the judge for clarification rather than try to puzzle it out themselves in a 55 page document.

    • @patcomerford5596
      @patcomerford5596 5 місяців тому

      @@Sarcasticron You are correct. I have discovered since the reason for his decision.

    • @patcomerford5596
      @patcomerford5596 5 місяців тому

      @@jend.1069 You are wicked.🤣

  • @WalkingmanPattaya
    @WalkingmanPattaya 5 місяців тому +3

    "Sitting for 5 weeks" 😂 was actually just 17 days and less than 8 hours a day.

  • @keith536
    @keith536 5 місяців тому +7

    One has to ask, (but knows the answer), if Trump wasn't running for President, would any of this be happening? The answer is no.

    • @pameladamaris3204
      @pameladamaris3204 5 місяців тому

      I would certainly hope so. What he engaged in was illegal activity, so whether he's running to be president or not, he should be judged by a jury of his peers.

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому +1

      No, it wouldn’t because it’s not an actual crime. They literally had to twist a pretzel up to figure out how to make this into a crime. The only way this could be a crime is if he was falsifying business records to cover up another crime. But in the jury instructions, they’re saying they don’t have to agree on what that crime was. Will you would think if the whole case is contingent on him having to commit that second crime they would definitely need to agree on what the crime that he committed. In a case, it has to be unanimous that a crime was committed & the type of crime. There’s no way this will not win in appeals. The jury said they don’t agree on what crime he committed which makes the whole case invalid. It’s bad jury instructions and it was intentional. If anything, the judge is committing the crime because the judge knows better.

  • @MS-_-4891
    @MS-_-4891 5 місяців тому +1

    "O our God, will You not judge them? For we are powerless against this great multitude which is coming against us. We do not know what to do, but our eyes are on You.”
    (So you'd know Who is actually in control).

  • @lynntidwell
    @lynntidwell 5 місяців тому +1

    Good explanation

  • @Nawanda
    @Nawanda 5 місяців тому +3

    RICO...IRS...

  • @Melrose51653
    @Melrose51653 5 місяців тому +1

    In my state, juries always get a copy of the instructions to take to the room during deliberations. Crazy to think people absorb unfamiliar things after just one reading of the content of the instructions.

    • @The_Red_Squirrel
      @The_Red_Squirrel 5 місяців тому

      That's what you get with 'states rights', just the same as it is when it comes to women's healthcare in pregnancy.

  • @jeffreyliddicoat1364
    @jeffreyliddicoat1364 5 місяців тому +3

    This is what it must have been like trying to convict capone or gotti

  • @Jon.......
    @Jon....... 5 місяців тому +2

    Isn't the New York (city) legal system guilty itself of breaking the same law (NYEL, Section 17-152) that they accused the Mighty T of breaking?

  • @JosePereira-kx1xl
    @JosePereira-kx1xl 5 місяців тому +1

    Obviously the New York legal system needs to make some sensible changes such as allowing copies of the jury instructions be provided to the jury.

  • @jbw53191
    @jbw53191 5 місяців тому +4

    As much as I want to see Trump held accountable, it seems this case is really threading a needle. I will be surprised if he's found guilty.

    • @bluehealer81
      @bluehealer81 5 місяців тому

      Concern troll is obvious.

  • @user-zu7gk9ol9f
    @user-zu7gk9ol9f 5 місяців тому +1

    All this “first time an American President…”, I haven’t thought once during this trial that he was a president bc he is so unpresidential.

  • @cmvamerica9011
    @cmvamerica9011 5 місяців тому

    Not Guilty.

  • @LISASTAUBIN-bd1mg
    @LISASTAUBIN-bd1mg 5 місяців тому +2

    Effing banana republic.

  • @eighty6films
    @eighty6films 5 місяців тому +6

    JUST GIVE THEM A COPY, it’s 2024 & that’s the most ridiculous WASTE OF TIME EVER.

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому +2

      and wait for 18? people to read 55 pages. that will go quick.

    • @cenauge
      @cenauge 5 місяців тому +1

      When they are confused about something in the instructions, do you want them to try and figure it out themselves from the document or just ask the judge? People can disagree on which way is better but it isn't an obvious choice.

  • @anarchist_parable
    @anarchist_parable 5 місяців тому +1

    I'm still really confused on what he did. He settled with Stormy out of court and what? Embezzled? What was the lie? I'm not being funny

    • @jzbman
      @jzbman 5 місяців тому +1

      Crickets….nobody knows.

    • @AutumnAspens68
      @AutumnAspens68 5 місяців тому +1

      @@jzbman Yeah no one knows what he did.

  • @rinyald_music
    @rinyald_music 5 місяців тому

    I'm just as confused as when I got here

  • @NoBrainTrashAim
    @NoBrainTrashAim 5 місяців тому

    He compared this to a murder case.. that is insane

  • @NoddyAlba
    @NoddyAlba 5 місяців тому +3

    🤔 so is trumps lawyers arguing the 152 ?

  • @undeadly1103
    @undeadly1103 5 місяців тому +2

    that thumbnail of him trying to smile is horrifying and hilarious at the same time

  • @peterlabelle2579
    @peterlabelle2579 5 місяців тому

    Thanks for explaining about the menu of possible crimes. That makes the juries job much less of a wide open decision than one might conclude based on earlier reporting. Nice job.

  • @dannywha8670
    @dannywha8670 5 місяців тому +2

    Making sure Trump doesn’t get reelected will also make sure he finally faces the rest of his criminal trials! Vote for justice. VOTE BLUE

  • @williamroyer4669
    @williamroyer4669 5 місяців тому +20

    Maybe a good night of no sleep will help Donald make sense 🖥🍿🤣

    • @kelperdude
      @kelperdude 5 місяців тому +3

      joe fell asleep at the memorial day ceremony.

    • @annamariaschmidt8131
      @annamariaschmidt8131 5 місяців тому +3

      Trump slept through his entire trial. They’re both older men. DT is 77? Biden 81.

    • @kelperdude
      @kelperdude 5 місяців тому +1

      It's indicative of how joe feels about vets.

    • @theresestcoeur5381
      @theresestcoeur5381 5 місяців тому

      ​@@kelperdude; Donald fell asleep again in the court room today ! AGAIN, DONSHITZINPANTS HAS TO HAVE AID from his buddy Valty !

    • @theresestcoeur5381
      @theresestcoeur5381 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@kelperdudeCompletely false...

  • @Sheruff1978
    @Sheruff1978 Місяць тому

    A non disclosure agreement is not illegal, nor is paying your lawyer for handling it.

  • @pauloicto8252
    @pauloicto8252 5 місяців тому +2

    Hey, Americans - YOU guys voted him into the oval office, so now prove to the World that you're truly repentant for causing all of this UTTER CRAP as a result of your decision - and LOCK HIM UP.

    • @Sue-u6z
      @Sue-u6z 5 місяців тому +2

      RESEARCH &: EDUCATE YOURSELF ❗

  • @billypardew2337
    @billypardew2337 5 місяців тому +3

    Get some mental gymnastics alone that the Democrats had to use just to bring these charges with no one actually knowing actually what he's actually being charged with it's just pathetic and if you don't think the people see it you're blind..... What happens if he's convicted..... I'll tell you what happens .... Straight to the White House

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому +1

      too easy.....big house.

    • @billypardew2337
      @billypardew2337 5 місяців тому

      @@davidcleveland-yv6my the White House if you think Trump does 30 seconds in a jail cell you need to get some help with your TDS that'll never happen

    • @nickigmiro5174
      @nickigmiro5174 15 днів тому

      @@davidcleveland-yv6myWRONG AGAIN! 😂🇺🇸🖕🏾

  • @elaineisabelle427
    @elaineisabelle427 5 місяців тому +2

    Guilty as charged, lock him up.

  • @sashakasprzyk5683
    @sashakasprzyk5683 5 місяців тому +4

    Trump is such a divisive and polarizing figure that he long ago lost the ability to unite the nation under any circumstances and for any cause.

    • @FieldBlaser
      @FieldBlaser 5 місяців тому +1

      That’s pretty big words/thinking for MAGA to comprehend. . 😆. Bravo 👏

    • @Sue-u6z
      @Sue-u6z 5 місяців тому

      Bull💩

    • @sashakasprzyk5683
      @sashakasprzyk5683 5 місяців тому

      @@FieldBlaser Trump loves money, TV, pretty boys, his hairdresser, and one of his kids.

  • @philthai99
    @philthai99 5 місяців тому

    Lock up Drumph up now.

  • @cenauge
    @cenauge 5 місяців тому +2

    It's even simpler than it seems. Pretend for a moment that this was about hiring a hitman. Falsifying the document is you wanting to hide that you solicited a murder (whether or not the murder ever ended up happening.) Whether your solicited that murder because your hated the victim or to cash in on an insurance policy or to get an inheritance isn't something the jury needs to unanimously agree on as long as they unanimously agree that you falsified documents to cover up that you solicited murder for any of those three reasons. One guy thinks you hated the victim, 2 think you wanted that life insurance policy, 9 think you were gunning for an early inheritance--12 jurors think you are guilty and that's that.

    • @blgdinger3
      @blgdinger3 5 місяців тому

      But what does hush money have to do with any of this

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому +1

      The reason that that’s not the same in your example is because the only way the first part of it can be a crime is is the second part of it. It was a crime. So it’s not disagreeing on why the crime was committed like your example is showing. The second part has to be a crime that they’re covering up. I.e. tax fraud. So they would need to unanimously agree on what that second crime was in order to make that one a crime. Otherwise they have three people saying he committed three different crimes to make that first one qualify as the crime.

  • @sharonmiliam3416
    @sharonmiliam3416 5 місяців тому +1

    Who is confused ?

    • @TiffanysBunnyGang
      @TiffanysBunnyGang 2 місяці тому

      They basically had to twister pretzel to get some kind of conviction to work. Let’s give the example of the murder trial. In a murder trial, you have to agree that the crime occurred, what the crime was, and what type of weapon was used in the crime. They are saying in Trump’s case the only way that falsifying business records could be a crime in this case Would be is if he was falsifying those business records to cover up another crime. But they are saying you don’t have to unanimously agree on what the second crime was. That is completely ridiculous. That would be like saying in a murder that you agree that they committed murder but you don’t agree on the weapon used. That would never be acceptable and a criminal trial ever. It will definitely be appealed but honestly, I don’t believe they care if it is appealed they just wanted to have it interfere with his ability to campaign during the election. Drain his money and be able to call him a fell in during the election. And this just proves it more than ever.

  • @charrio2
    @charrio2 5 місяців тому +2

    Everything leads to a guilty verdict. How can it be any other way. He admitted his guilt in so many different ways publicly. Every tactics to prevent this case from happening shows his guilt. He cant prove his Innocence hes definitely not Mother Teresa....shameful he even uses her name

  • @dragonstepper
    @dragonstepper 5 місяців тому +1

    Seriously so dumb to make a big deal of this

  • @Willy-nu3oc
    @Willy-nu3oc 5 місяців тому

    It's so easy to be guilty these days

  • @savvygood
    @savvygood 5 місяців тому

    They should have had cameras. I would have liked to see the trial

  • @RaymondPeckIII
    @RaymondPeckIII 5 місяців тому

    Glad to see TLev up there. He's my ideal of a Music Man player. ❤️

  • @josephholliman6006
    @josephholliman6006 5 місяців тому +1

    The idea of decision matrix is not new with me. I have seen these used by a couple of public utility commissions. It is very helpful for complex cases.

  • @CavemanVanDweller
    @CavemanVanDweller 5 місяців тому +1

    I heard nothing but projection. Great reporting 😃👍

    • @CavemanVanDweller
      @CavemanVanDweller 5 місяців тому

      @@learnsteelguitarinretirement 1:30 their interfering in this election with the lawfare

    • @jrrarglblarg9241
      @jrrarglblarg9241 5 місяців тому

      ​@@CavemanVanDweller So, you think it’s perfectly acceptable to lie to the government on your bookkeeping? And you would say this if a democrat did it?
      Sure, “Gus.”

    • @CavemanVanDweller
      @CavemanVanDweller 5 місяців тому

      @@jrrarglblarg9241 the gubmint lied to you and is extorting money constantly 🤷🏽‍♂️

  • @BlueJazzBoyNZ
    @BlueJazzBoyNZ 5 місяців тому +1

    The most misunderstood twist in Donald
    Just how hard has Melania Renegotiated..!
    After. He was, "speaking in tongues"

  • @NDARYBC
    @NDARYBC 5 місяців тому +1

    trump Testimony is during morning break at 9am and lunch at 12pm, listen to the words coming out of his BIG MOUTH$.

  • @min2oly
    @min2oly 5 місяців тому +2

    Trump the GLOAT, master projector...

  • @MidwestRdub
    @MidwestRdub 5 місяців тому +8

    Why do you assume we're morons? And why do you assume these jurors are morons? Life is complicated. These laws aren't.

    • @JimTimber
      @JimTimber 5 місяців тому

      you tell 'em ronny !!

    • @Nawanda
      @Nawanda 5 місяців тому +1

      True...and why all the shouting?

    • @tmi1234567
      @tmi1234567 5 місяців тому +1

      The jury did have a lot of info thrown at them over the course of the last few weeks. Yet, they only now are getting to know what laws are at play here. I am gad that the jury has two lawyers/attorneys as members because it may allow the jury to have more independence and encourage them all to come to the right just verdict.

  • @johnnovack6168
    @johnnovack6168 5 місяців тому

    irrelevant that he’s an ex-president-he’s a citizen.

  • @ROCKY-w5r
    @ROCKY-w5r 5 місяців тому

    Those instructions seems like the jurors are righting doctorate exams😂

  • @uwsgrrrl9981
    @uwsgrrrl9981 5 місяців тому

    Very complicated jury instructions.

  • @ricf9592
    @ricf9592 5 місяців тому

    It seems to have been missed that a guilty verdict in this case doesn't demand a jail sentence. The Judge said it himself when admonishing Todd Whatisname.

  • @jonathandnicholson
    @jonathandnicholson 5 місяців тому +1

    Not a wise analogy used by Duncan Levin. The murder weapon is the means of a murder.

  • @lawrenceleverton7426
    @lawrenceleverton7426 5 місяців тому +2

    The Judge will be getting Jury Instructions everyday. 55 pages wont be allowed in the Jury Room. Whats up with that. I heard it takes over 1 hr just to read them.

    • @jennaxoxox4821
      @jennaxoxox4821 5 місяців тому

      Weird quirk of NY law. Something about not overly burdening the jury.

    • @typicalhguy9290
      @typicalhguy9290 5 місяців тому +1

      @@jennaxoxox4821 One of those rules that probably made good sense for whatever reason it was created, but then we come to a case like this and it seems totally counterproductive. I agree with the original poster, they're probably going to need it read to them repeatedly, and there will probably still be disagreements among the jurors each time over what they just heard. Human nature is inescapable! 😃

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому +1

      they will probably only want to revue certain portions not the whole thing.

  • @THEWEIM
    @THEWEIM 5 місяців тому

    ALWAYS A TWIST !! TUMP 2024

    • @thepaulusmaximus
      @thepaulusmaximus 5 місяців тому

      Another stable genius was heard from. Who's Tump?

    • @THEWEIM
      @THEWEIM 5 місяців тому

      @@thepaulusmaximus AND WHATS GREAT UNDER JOE .. WAITING ..

  • @josephholliman6006
    @josephholliman6006 5 місяців тому +2

    55 pages of jury instruction which I take to contain decision points and they read them to the jurists??? They should give them a decision matrix and access to the transcripts and evidence so they can set up a process. It seems od that the press can get copies of the transcripts but the jurists can't???

    • @MadCatLady28
      @MadCatLady28 5 місяців тому

      Yeah, I find that really odd. Took me a while to track down the written jury instructions, I'd find it far more sensible to have a copy in the jury room.

    • @alfredgeorge3186
      @alfredgeorge3186 5 місяців тому

      The jury has a laptop.
      If you can find a copy of the instructions, so can they....

    • @typicalhguy9290
      @typicalhguy9290 5 місяців тому

      @@alfredgeorge3186 Presumably the laptop is customized to jury use. No internet access, and just the tools and information they need to review the allowed testimony and evidence. Oh, and Minesweeper. Gotta have that.

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому

      it is a new york law. i doubt they can access it on line.

    • @MadCatLady28
      @MadCatLady28 5 місяців тому

      @@alfredgeorge3186 their laptop is loaded up with trial documents/exhibits and isn't connected to the Internet.

  • @tjhill4044
    @tjhill4044 5 місяців тому

    Typical Trumpian: confusing so much that everybody gives up.

  • @sharonmiliam3416
    @sharonmiliam3416 5 місяців тому

    So , whats hard about that ? The people listen to the the trial , look at the evidence etc. Why are yall trying to make it Harder than what it is ! Please !

  • @theresasantiago1788
    @theresasantiago1788 5 місяців тому +2

    I just luv Ur smiling faces...😅😊New Chump NFTS [ Ending scene ♥️ of The Untouchables *** with : Mr Kevin Costner and Mr Robert Dinero ♥️...Capone dragged away...kicking and Screaming 😱 ♥️ ❤️ 💖 💙 Aaaaah

  • @sydtopia
    @sydtopia 5 місяців тому +4

    This court case is a joke. At least the jury are taking it seriously which means probably won't be found guilty.

    • @davidcleveland-yv6my
      @davidcleveland-yv6my 5 місяців тому

      wouldn't that lead to dystopia?

    • @sydtopia
      @sydtopia 5 місяців тому +4

      @@davidcleveland-yv6my nope. People seem to think Trump will end the world. These people are just insane.

    • @LiftUpNotDown
      @LiftUpNotDown 5 місяців тому

      😂 you’ve been on your knees for Trump too much. Chapped lips?

  • @sashakasprzyk5683
    @sashakasprzyk5683 5 місяців тому +2

    Trump loves money, TV, pretty boys, his hairdresser, and one of his kids.

  • @johnk9029
    @johnk9029 5 місяців тому

    What's up with the Orange tie (worn ever since the Red Tie Brigade showed up)? "Better to match my Orange skin, my dear." (With apologies to the wolf in Red Riding Hood).

  • @miguelpaul1164
    @miguelpaul1164 5 місяців тому +2

    🐷 👀

  • @cmvamerica9011
    @cmvamerica9011 5 місяців тому

    He only needs one MAGA person on that jury.😂😂😂😂

  • @snowyowel7961
    @snowyowel7961 5 місяців тому +1

    ❤🎉TRUMP 🎉❤
    🇺🇸 TRUMP 🇺🇸

  • @Pavlovs_Dog
    @Pavlovs_Dog 5 місяців тому

    d'ooooh