It really does depend on the scanner though, if it requires manual advancing of the film, it can suddenly take much longer. But I understand where you're coming from, I've seen some crazy scan prices too!
Well worth the price though. I've processed many rolls in a Paterson tank and I get ok results but nothing compared to the lab. And I'm not using those C41 kits with blix, I'm using actual Kodak LORR chemicals.
Minusta on harmillista, että nuoremman polven valokuvauksen harrastajat käyttävät filmiä lähinnä digitaalisten tiedostojen materiaalina - lopullinen tuote, jota he haluavat, on yleensä kuva, jota katsotaan näyttöruudulta. Suuri osa ei vedosta kuviaan paperille - ei millään menetelmällä. Kun läppäreiden monitorien säädöt - puhelimista puhumattakaan - ovat yleensä vähän mitä sattuu, menee aika paljon työstä hukkaan. Toki ymmärrän, että digitaaliselle kuvalle filmistäkin on käyttötarkoituksensa - esimerkiksi painotyöt-
What ironic is you said the machine is fast, but actually FP232B is the slowest Film Processor Fujifilm ever made,i owned FP 550 it's older than FP232B but it's way faster
The video shows that they [process E-6 in a Jobo with at DIY home three-bath kit. That presents a significant loss of quality, which in turn would have me moving my E-6 processing somewhere where they took my business seriously.
![How Does Film ACTUALLY Work? (It's MAGIC) [Photos and Development] - Smarter Every Day 258](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TCxoZlFqzwA/mqdefault.jpg)
This video brings back such memories! I worked in a minilab for many years in my younger days!
Really great video! I’m interested in how this all works and I feel like you’re an expert, well done!
Another great video!
All the labs where I live charge way too much for scans considering how fast it is to do. Their basic resolution is usually super low too.
It really does depend on the scanner though, if it requires manual advancing of the film, it can suddenly take much longer. But I understand where you're coming from, I've seen some crazy scan prices too!
scanner costs, employee costs, rent
Well worth the price though. I've processed many rolls in a Paterson tank and I get ok results but nothing compared to the lab. And I'm not using those C41 kits with blix, I'm using actual Kodak LORR chemicals.
Really informative, thanks!
Several decades ago the negative was exposed to photographic paper. and this went through developer, fixative bleach, stabilizer and drying.
If the lab is not used often but they hand develop film you will be fine. I often used a lab that uses a Jobo and the results are great.
If I may point it out. Chemisty does not take well to air outside the lab machine. This is why I prefer JOBO bottles so I can squeeze air out.
Man used to have all of this machine missed it
this is great. I wonder how much those scanners are worth!
I'd love to try operating such a minilab. ^^
Minusta on harmillista, että nuoremman polven valokuvauksen harrastajat käyttävät filmiä lähinnä digitaalisten tiedostojen materiaalina - lopullinen tuote, jota he haluavat, on yleensä kuva, jota katsotaan näyttöruudulta. Suuri osa ei vedosta kuviaan paperille - ei millään menetelmällä. Kun läppäreiden monitorien säädöt - puhelimista puhumattakaan - ovat yleensä vähän mitä sattuu, menee aika paljon työstä hukkaan. Toki ymmärrän, että digitaaliselle kuvalle filmistäkin on käyttötarkoituksensa - esimerkiksi painotyöt-
What ironic is you said the machine is fast, but actually FP232B is the slowest Film Processor Fujifilm ever made,i owned FP 550 it's older than FP232B but it's way faster
The video shows that they [process E-6 in a Jobo with at DIY home three-bath kit. That presents a significant loss of quality, which in turn would have me moving my E-6 processing somewhere where they took my business seriously.
Thats a load of crap
Hello nice video just in case if you needed new film processors /negative scanners or spare parts for those. Please let us know.
You left out the final step…when the scan is turned into a print. Can you do another video?
Oho missasin ekan osan, täytyypä mennä kahtoon.