More Self Running Generator Tests

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @davidroth4514
    @davidroth4514 Рік тому +3

    When I was about 6 or 7 I took 2 d c motors and connect them shaft to shaft !!! I first found out that if you put a battery on one I could get electric out of the other one's wires . So I thought that if one one was powering the other it should run but it didn't !!! I had found out the second law of thermal dynamics before luring the whole story of thermal dynamics !!! I don't know why people think that they can beat physics !!! Like I said I was a small kid but came to the conclusion that it wasn't going to work even though I didn't know why !!! I came to realize when I was older that I was not the only one who has tried to make energy from these kinds of things ! People have tried to do it for a long time before I was born !! That was like fifty four years ago when I tried these kind of experiments !!

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  Рік тому +2

      But the guys in India are able to self run by going big and then using a large flywheel it makes a surplus amount of power?

    • @JenkoRun
      @JenkoRun 10 місяців тому

      That "law" isn't a law, it's an observation:
      "A time variable electric current creates an electric field parallel to that current. The field exerts an electric force on the charge in the nearby conductors thereby creating induced electric currents in them. This in the term “electromagnetic induction” is an actually a misnomer, since no magnetic effect is involved in the phenomena, and since the induced current is caused solely by the time variable electric current and by the electric field produced by that current."
      "There exists a sourceless electromagnetic field whereas according to equation 528 such fields are impossible since there is no doubt that they represent a dual wave field, but as we've seen neither Maxwell's equations nor their solutions indicate the existence of causal links (no causation) between electric and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a duel entity always having electrical and magnetic components simultaneously created by their common sources; time variable electric charges and currents."
      "according to these equations in time variable systems electrical and magnetic fields are always created simultaneously because they have a common causative source, the changing electrical current, once created the two fields coexist from then on without any effect upon each other. Therefore electromagnetic induction is a phenomenon in which the field creates the other, I.E energy generation is an illusion. The illusion of mutual creation arises from the facts and time-dependent systems of the two fields appearing predominantly together."
      -Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields by Oleg D. Jefimenko
      I hope the implications of this are apparent.

  • @JenkoRun
    @JenkoRun 10 місяців тому +1

    Hi monstirz, since you're experimenting with self-running motors I figured this little piece of info from Peter Lindemann's Electric Motor Secrets (Part 2) would be of use to you, it's a bit summarized from the original video but hopefully I get the point across:
    Take a closer look at Kirchhoff's Second Law and take note of what the Back-EMF in the motor windings is actually doing, once you figure it out you realize all motors are at a base level 200% efficient minus the other losses, the voltage of the CEMF is neither lost or an abstraction, if it was an abstraction it wouldn't be capable doing real work in the form of CEMF, it's under-unity only because that voltage is *rising* in the opposite direction as a result of the motors generator function being activated by the induction of supplied power.
    E[a] (Applied Voltage) - E[c] (Counter Voltage) = E[e] (Effective Voltage): 100% - conventional losses.
    But if we change that to
    E[a] + E[c] = E[e]: 200% - conventional losses.
    Mechanical energy output / Electrical Energy Input = Efficiency
    Example: 634 Watts / 746 Watts x 100 = 85%
    Mechanical energy output / Effective Energy Input = Efficiency
    Example: 634 Watts / 373 Watts x 100 = 170%
    Take a look at Tesla's patent 390,414 where Tesla states numerous times the coils are in "one or more pairs" and "independently energized" and ufopolitics's asymmetrical motors based on the info in that patent. Continuous Current (DC) with 0 time change won't work, at least not that I've ever seen, the principle appears to be shared with the Bedini system of pulsed/impulsed input at the right time.

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  10 місяців тому

      If we could run it backwards while going back in time and regenerate the energy we lost maybe then? LOL

  • @davidroth4514
    @davidroth4514 Рік тому +3

    I also tried to put more together hopeful if I had 2 to generate it would run it's, self ! But even putting more as generators it still could not keep keep turning with out an out side energy source !!! No free lunch !!! If you are trying to charge batteries there's a lot of easy all ready available options available for this purpose !!!

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  Рік тому +1

      I was thinking that going big would make it happen. With a 2 kw 500 rpm rare earth magnet generator and a 3 hp 12v motor may work to power itself and make surplus energy. My 29vdc Walmart batteries went up .39 volts after running it for 30 minutes or so with 5 magnets on the rotor. It was set at 41 v AC on the variac. I saw a video years ago of a guy in mexico had 4 alternators on a small 4 cylinder car engine like out of a fiat and it charged his batteries really fast for a small amount of gas. He ran it only once a day.

  • @humboldte55
    @humboldte55 5 місяців тому

    We keep trying to re invent the wheel and has us running in circles- rotary engines like Mazda- mixed with Tesla and mixed with this- the bent pyramid was a hint at the triangle rotor

  • @tristanmcnabb2741
    @tristanmcnabb2741 Рік тому

    Allsome work from cruzermans invention 🤠🎉

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  Рік тому +1

      I did not know someone else invented this. I added a total of 7 magnets and set it at 75 v a/c on the variac and ran it for about 10 minutes today and it took two 29vdc walmart batteries from 12.66 to 12.77. Then it became to hot to run. Maybe a 2 hp motor would work better.

  • @QuantumEnergySearch
    @QuantumEnergySearch Рік тому +1

    Interesting video. There is a simple type of motor that's a bit similar to an alternator which can easily go over-unity. It has permanent magnets, induction motors are a junk design.

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  Рік тому +1

      Interesting! I had this equipment sitting around from 5 years ago and wanted to try using it to see what it could do. I retested it and it made .39 volts in 30 minutes. It is really making around 80 volts with a 48 volt stator. which inverts to 120v through 2 29vdc marine batteries. When the sun does not shine I run it to supplement extra energy to all my power tool batteries. And cameras and jump boxes and phones and i pad etc.

    • @QuantumEnergySearch
      @QuantumEnergySearch Рік тому +1

      @@monstirz yes, it's called a resonant motor/generator. I can send you more info about it if you want. It can easily be 300% efficient.

    • @monstirz
      @monstirz  Рік тому +1

      Sure send me the info if you like.@@QuantumEnergySearch

    • @tristanmcnabb2741
      @tristanmcnabb2741 Рік тому

      Allsome work from cruzermans inventions 😁👍🎉🌟🦇

    • @Pyroteknikid
      @Pyroteknikid 11 місяців тому

      @@QuantumEnergySearch Link to patent?

  • @Edo-z5y
    @Edo-z5y 5 днів тому

    that rotor is too heavy. the rotor must absorb less current than what is produced. like this : ua-cam.com/video/WeimnyrfX1c/v-deo.htmlsi=3DawHVh_WRKZaxTB