Reviewers so concern about the small 3rd row seats of all SUVs. Get a commuter van if you want space. The 3rd row for SUVs are intended for cargos space. They only put seats there for maximum use of space.
I've had mine for about a month and a half now. Non-S, Premium trim, under $45k and 0.9% financing. Is it perfect? No, but it is a TREMENDOUS bang for the buck at that price.
@@carenthusiast4984that's absolutely true. So in normal mode, at low speed, the electric motor gets the car going, and it's jumpy/inconsistent with its power delivery. My understanding is this is solved by the solenoid update I expect to get when I go for my first oil change. Once the transmission takes over it is okay. It's not 'torque converter' smooth because it's a wet clutch but it's still good. What I'll point out is that the hybrid boost makes a 'whoop' sound when it applies a boost to smooth out a gear shift as you land at your desired cruising speed. For example, if accelerating to 45 mph you may hear a 'whoop' sound as you reach 6th gear and land at your cruising speed. I've heard this sound at speeds as low as 26 mph. I don't hear it as much if I'm in Sport mode. Last thing, the I-Drive mode. Let me start by saying I HATE the typical auto stop/start function most modern cars have. But I gotta say, I like I-Drive on the CX-90. It will literally turn your engine off while cruising at high speeds and you won't even realize it. Then it re-engages the engine when necessary. There is only the slightest power delivery lag as a result. I have not only gotten used to it but I like it, and it really helps your MPG. Of course, I-Drive can be turned off if you want.
These low APRs Mazda is offering makes me wish I had listened to my wife and waited to purchase. However, my kid needed a vehicle to drive to school so my kid got my old Kia and I got my CX90 PHEV.
In regards to the chimes upon starting the engine, I always put my seatbelt on right after I push start and it chimes maybe twice. The entire premise is to get you to put your seatbelt on. It absolutely does it’s job.
Good well-rounded reviews! Shame the transmission is still clunky, hope they're able to fix. Wish there was a non-hybrid version with a small torque converter. I'd even take a non-turbo version TBH. FYI, Sport mode is just changing throttle sensitivity, and shift programming. Steering effort or anything else like suspension is not affected.
6:29 We have the PHEV. If you’re in Sport mode the power is instantaneous and effortless. It’s actually faster to 60mph than the top Turbo S inline-6 Turbo.
@@LafemmebearMusic It's faster 0-60 and silky smooth, but if you accelerate on highway to pass, the inline 6 feels more powerful. If you primarily drive on highway, get inline 6 model. If you drive in town mainly, get phev.
Excellent review as always. I really like the family angle and it is fun watching your little girl grow up. However, it interesting how different reviewers feel about which engine they like the best. Many prefer the I6, others the PHEV. I will admit that hybrid lacks the smoothness of the 6 but I love the gas mileage (I plug mine in daily) and the low end torque from the hybrid engine.
You need to augment for where each reviewer tests the vehicles. Micah drives mostly mountain passes, where the PHEV may be out of its natural habitat (urban roads and freeways that are congested, where fuel economy shines), and linearity of Inline-6 is more fitting.
I want to change my opinion on the smoothness. I recently had a i6 loaner vehicle and much to my surprise I now think the PHEV is smoother. However when driving at highway speeds (70 mph) and you step on it to pass even the base i6 accelerates significantly better than the PHEV.
9:48 gosh the left hand drive transmision stick is weird I got cx-60 right hand drive, cuz i live in asia And the P is just straight line with N & D If you wanna reverse just put in the P and move to the right and you got tge R😮
@@ravipeiris4388 true, but they have always felt flimsy. I drove my neighbor’s in 79 and didn’t like the handling and feel. Reliable, but not to my liking. I drove one recently and it really felt like a high end car. Still a bit flimsy feeling compared to American and European, but that’s a Japanese thing I’m not crazy about. However, they feel way better than they have in the past.
It's for a feature called Driver Attention Alert. The vehicle monitors the driver for signs of distraction or drowsiness and will alert them accordingly.
I agree with Evie ...the CX-90 looks great in white. And, I like the black interior with the tan-colored stripe. Also, the black interior has grey-stained wood that looks better. I don't like anything that is beige-and-white such as the leather and wood in your tester. It is wood, isn't it?
Micah and family, what about the engine and associated (regular) maintenance? belts, pumps, plugs, etc.? I hear the I6 might need a lot of "engine out" for some serviceable items...
I love my CX90 PHEV, but sometimes the clunkiness is annoying. Even at highway speeds you sometimes get a clunk that is so pronounced it sometimes feels as if the vehicle got bumped. However, the remarkable gas mileage makes up for it.
I own the Preffered Plus CX 90. The only things I would have liked on my vehicle are mirror mounted garage door opener and seat memory buttons, neither of which is critically important to me.
Recently had a Preferred Plus loaner. I also would have preferred to have an XM radio (however I had the app). Also, not having a 360 camera it really needs front and rear sensors.
I haven't tried it, but typically for the transmission to shift into Park when you accidentally leave it in R and open the door the seat belt has to be unbuckled.
Zack and and Andrea from Motormouth test drove this and Andrea loves Mazda but both did complain about the transmission and it seems that it may need to get a software update because of the jerkiness.
Software update is already out there. They don't like the heavy steering but I love it. Funny they keep mentioning they had a Cayenne and loved it but Cayenne has heavy steering too. I have both Cayenne and CX-90 and love steering on both.
I noticed the same distinction between the inline 6 and the hybrid on the CX-90 launch event after driving both back-to-back. There are powertrain tuning peculiarities with the hybrid that aren't present with the non-hybrid I6.
I disagree strongly about the fabric on the dash. I happen to be in the textile industry and know it is a very high-quality high-performance fabric. It doesn't look cheap at all to me. Material selection is what makes this competitive with luxury brands.
Micah what will be cool is Mazda have their sport brand name like Honda Type r. Mazda should have their suv sport name and the horsepower and torque will be 380 HP and 425 torque. And the towing capacity should be 7,500 every other car will be like omg wow
You told us to leave you a comment if you forget something. Well, there's one thing. You forgot to mention another competitor in its price segment which is the Nissan Pathfinder which I find to be a better looking SUV.
I think it compares extremely well. I actually chose the CX90 over the MDX. Any Premium Plus model will give you most of the features of an Advance Model CX90 for anywhere from 5-10 thousand dollars less.
Leg room is fine in the front and second row. Becomes more cramped in the third row but how many times are people really traveling around with 5 plus adults in a vehicle?
I wonder if the bikini influencer made a comment on their instagram, “hey there goes Micah Muzio & Co in a car review!” Cool SUV, Cooler sunglasses! 🕶️
I'm a former CX-9 owner and test drove the 90 yesterday. It definitely has more room in the front seat especially the width, but aside from that, it feels much smaller than the competition.
Technically its really a wagon.....no true SUV pretenses whatsoever. That being said...Mazda builds quality vehicles and this is one of them.....Drove it compared to many others....Ended up getting a 23' Santa Fe 2.5t Calligraphy instead. Thanks for the great content as always.
I Absolutely hate the back of this car … I’d you are looking at it from the back it looks like a minivan , that egg shell back is terrible. I was so hoping the 70 they would have slanted that down … but no it’s a cx90 with third row delete ! Lol thanks for the review ! New sub here !
Enjoy what they’ve done with the front end styling on these new models, but I think they lose some appeal the further you move towards the rear end. I generally like the interior design (lack of piano black is much appreciated), and don’t mind the media control dial; you can get used to it. I think it’s way more user friendly than the laptop-style mousepad on the Acura. Biggest gripe with the interior is probably the cargo area. Didn’t seem that wide or spacious for how large the car is, and the seats (much like my CX-5) don’t provide the flattest loading platform once folded. The CX-70 looks better in this regard, which you’d expect given the lack of 3rd row. Kind of odd it’s almost the same car aside from that distinction. I have to wonder if most people shopping for an actual family hauler will seriously be considering a CX-90 anyway. It doesn’t have that great of a third row, they probably won’t care as much about the driving performance oriented powertrain, and the pricing of the higher trims will start to look pretty unattractive. Outside of brand loyalty shoppers, I can see family buyers preferring a grand highlander, pilot, palisade, or perhaps even the new sante fe.
I was so excited for this CX-90. But when we drove it, I had my teenage boys sit in the third row and knew it wouldn't work. we went with the grand highlander.
@@kfc_hackeye That only makes sense to me. Appears as though Toyota had a more focused mission/target audience for the Grand Highlander as a family hauler with some guts. Meanwhile, the CX-90 may be their largest car, but that doesn’t make it inherently a great option for families. I’m not in need of a family hauler, so look at it a little differently, but if I was, I would be cross shopping pretty hard.
Mazda Metallic reds are stunning and this one is no different. It does, however, looks like it’s been run through 40,000 automatic car washes. Somebody please correct that paint! 😢
It sounds like a little premature extrapolation on Mazda's part...you test drive proves that its not quite ready for prime time yet. That's a miss as their "first ever" PHEV and inline 6 should have been launched when it was fully ready. Also, I have a 2023 CX-5 Turbo and I agree with your comments - the car just nags too much! Thanks for another great, clear and unbiased review. Cheers from Canada ... Jim
well, German cars nag too, and if Mazda is trying to be German, well, they are only following who they want to be like... former GTI owner so familiar with VW nagging features
I like the look of the cx90, but I'm unlikely to ever see one in the metal. I'm on the wrong side of the Atlantic. I agree that light colours are better.
As a Maybach driver, I utilize my 2008 Honda CRV as my daily driver. I'm going to purchase this vehicle for Mazda's reliability, the car's good looks and resale value ❤.
Hard disagree with Evie about the color. No better red than Mazda red. Also, that dash piece looks like it's made of the cupholders they give you at a coffee shop.
If you're reviewing a family car, you really should be commenting on the AC in the back, or lack thereof in this case as there's only 2 tiny vents at the back of the front center consol... no way my teens are going to think that's enough AC on a 100F day. I don't understand why ALL suvs don't have AC in the ceiling!
You're right about rear ventilation. It's amazing how many vehicles we drive don't have any adjustable rear vents. We typically try to note their absence but don't always succeed. Good thought about ceiling vents. I know its a design pain for car makers but we love vehicles that have them.
It’s a 90 that Micah is showing. However, recently Mazda revealed the 70, and majority of people said it looks exactly the same as the 90 with third-row deleted. The dimensions are almost exactly the same as well. That’s why people make jokes about. The CX70 is a nice suv, but I do have to agree with the majority that Mazda overhyped it, and the CX70 turns out to be dead on arrival because you’re better off with the CX90 so that you have more space and features with the third row just in case of the emergency.
Really nice car but these aren't selling well and already are on big discount in my area. After the CX-9 failed to compete, I understand why Mazda didn't learn the lesson that having below average cargo and third row space in one of the biggest (by exterior dimension) cars in the class wasn't a winning formula. Luxury and driving dynamics are important but for the three row family segment, utility is king and this falls on its face compared to the Pilot, Telluride, and Grand Highlander on those counts. It has almost exactly the same amount of space behind the first row as a CRV which is a full two size classes down and is miles behind something its competitors on max cargo space.
Never understand why Mazda would give this such a stupid shifter.. If they would have just given it a regular traditional shifter it would have been so MUCH better..
Recently test drove this. It’s pretty cramped and feels more like a car than a $54K+ three row SUV. I’m coming from a 2021 Honda Pilot and choosing the 2024 Pilot instead of the CX-90.
Stiff ride, clunky transmission, slow steering. It is like you make the sacrifices giving up comfort but you don't get much back in fun and sporty driving. But the platform has potential - Mazda just need to spend a bit more time fine-tuning the car.
This was the second vehicle that is co developed with Toyota... Notice all of their other vehicles up to date have had no significant issues from the factory
I own one, and I do wish they would have fine tuned it better. However, they have gradually been addressing all of the most concerning issues (which are mostly relatively minor). However, that “slow” steering is so reassuring at highway speeds.
At 60k there are some very obvious issues. For one, that’s about the price of an Audi q7 or BMW X5. Both of those are going to have all doors with keyless access. And regardless of reliability, Mazda does not have the brand prestige to get away with those prices.
Mazda has recently lowered the prices of all top trims (other than the PHEV) at least $4,000.00. Also, any BMW or Mercedes at that price are not going to have ANY of the features you want.
IMO, I think this and much of their upcoming product mix is intended more as a Infiniti, Acura, Buick, maybe Genesis , and even lower trim Lexus, BMW, Audi, Merc fighter...it can't compete at the top of the product ranges in each class but this is a good first effort to me on paper...going to touch and feel it personally soon as I am considering it for the next Family hauler
You are right, it cannot match the sea of Piano Black in newest Audi and Mercedes models that reflect sunlight in just ever-so-perfect way to blind the driver and collect fingerprints. As for BMW, in latest models you are saying goodbye for some of physical Climate control buttons. I am glad Mazda went its own way and did not copycat all of the manufacturers above.
That color wood trim looks absolutely atrocious on camera. It looks yellow, sometimes with a hint of green, absolutely nasty. In person this has to look better???
Handsome looking car, nice interior and that is it. Lack of practicality and functionality, which are essentials of a 3 row suv, is killing this car. Who wants such a big car, when size dont bring you any benefit?? Mazda engineers fail again, after failing with CX9 with same reasons.
I saw it, I have a 2005 ford explorer, replaced trasmission at 160k last year. I am hoping cx-90 trans last at least 150k. I have a vw eos and turbo still working fine at 105k. My only concern is how hard is to replace the spark plugs, water pump, tensioner or alternator..😁😁😁😁
Have you seen or heard anyone backing up the car care nut guy and what he said? I know a few people that have Mazda CX9s with a lot of miles and they love them - the car care nut guy also does not like the CX9. I’m thinking about getting a CX90 - if you have more info let me know - thanks!
@@Jay-bw3fl I realize they are different CX9 vs CX90. It’s just that the car care nut also reviewed the CX9 and didn’t care for it as well. My take is his CX90 review was very harsh and his CX9 review was only harsh.
Shut off car ..radio & phone calls bye bye?, as cx5, also remote start…open any door , engine bye bye..so dam annoying , in fact the entertainment system is intolerable
Micah what will be cool is Mazda have their sport brand name like Honda Type r. Mazda should have their suv sport name and the horsepower and torque will be 380 HP and 425 torque. And the towing capacity should be 7,500 every other car will be like omg wow.
Reviewers so concern about the small 3rd row seats of all SUVs. Get a commuter van if you want space. The 3rd row for SUVs are intended for cargos space. They only put seats there for maximum use of space.
I've had mine for about a month and a half now. Non-S, Premium trim, under $45k and 0.9% financing. Is it perfect? No, but it is a TREMENDOUS bang for the buck at that price.
for 45k , def worth it. 60k , hell no.
I’m going to test drive one next week. How do you find the transmission? I’ve heard it’s something that you need to get used to.
@@carenthusiast4984that's absolutely true. So in normal mode, at low speed, the electric motor gets the car going, and it's jumpy/inconsistent with its power delivery. My understanding is this is solved by the solenoid update I expect to get when I go for my first oil change. Once the transmission takes over it is okay. It's not 'torque converter' smooth because it's a wet clutch but it's still good. What I'll point out is that the hybrid boost makes a 'whoop' sound when it applies a boost to smooth out a gear shift as you land at your desired cruising speed. For example, if accelerating to 45 mph you may hear a 'whoop' sound as you reach 6th gear and land at your cruising speed. I've heard this sound at speeds as low as 26 mph. I don't hear it as much if I'm in Sport mode.
Last thing, the I-Drive mode. Let me start by saying I HATE the typical auto stop/start function most modern cars have. But I gotta say, I like I-Drive on the CX-90. It will literally turn your engine off while cruising at high speeds and you won't even realize it. Then it re-engages the engine when necessary. There is only the slightest power delivery lag as a result. I have not only gotten used to it but I like it, and it really helps your MPG. Of course, I-Drive can be turned off if you want.
These low APRs Mazda is offering makes me wish I had listened to my wife and waited to purchase.
However, my kid needed a vehicle to drive to school so my kid got my old Kia and I got my CX90 PHEV.
@@carenthusiast4984I wrote a long reply but it seems like it vanished. You didn't see it, did you?
In regards to the chimes upon starting the engine, I always put my seatbelt on right after I push start and it chimes maybe twice. The entire premise is to get you to put your seatbelt on. It absolutely does it’s job.
Mine doesn't make this sound when I start it without seatbelt on. I guess they have fixed that issue
Always love your family reviews!
I love that CX90, it reminds me of my 07 Dodge Magnum
Good well-rounded reviews!
Shame the transmission is still clunky, hope they're able to fix. Wish there was a non-hybrid version with a small torque converter. I'd even take a non-turbo version TBH.
FYI, Sport mode is just changing throttle sensitivity, and shift programming. Steering effort or anything else like suspension is not affected.
The I6 is a buttery creamy puller, that gets great mileage. Solid review✅
6:29 We have the PHEV. If you’re in Sport mode the power is instantaneous and effortless. It’s actually faster to 60mph than the top Turbo S inline-6 Turbo.
That’s not true the faster than top trim statement. Just checked that with many publications. Did you test it is that what you’re basing that off of?
@@LafemmebearMusic It's faster 0-60 and silky smooth, but if you accelerate on highway to pass, the inline 6 feels more powerful. If you primarily drive on highway, get inline 6 model. If you drive in town mainly, get phev.
Are you sure that's not a CX70?
It should put you in park if you open the door.
😂
😄😐
That is the cx 90 because it has third row. The xc 70 has no third row, they both look the same.
@@timothyzhuk2847
He knew that. It was a joke.
😂😂😂😂
Excellent review as always. I really like the family angle and it is fun watching your little girl grow up.
However, it interesting how different reviewers feel about which engine they like the best. Many prefer the I6, others the PHEV.
I will admit that hybrid lacks the smoothness of the 6 but I love the gas mileage (I plug mine in daily) and the low end torque from the hybrid engine.
You need to augment for where each reviewer tests the vehicles. Micah drives mostly mountain passes, where the PHEV may be out of its natural habitat (urban roads and freeways that are congested, where fuel economy shines), and linearity of Inline-6 is more fitting.
I want to change my opinion on the smoothness. I recently had a i6 loaner vehicle and much to my surprise I now think the PHEV is smoother.
However when driving at highway speeds (70 mph) and you step on it to pass even the base i6 accelerates significantly better than the PHEV.
That red is amazing.
The dealer updates have helped a lot with the PHEV smoothness.
Definitely
Did you ask your dealer to update your CX-90?
@@ervindelacruz8 it was part of the transmission solenoid recall.
@@DV8shredder what is the build date of your CX-90?
@@ervindelacruz8 I bought it in July, build date was May I believe.
9:48 gosh the left hand drive transmision stick is weird
I got cx-60 right hand drive, cuz i live in asia
And the P is just straight line with N & D
If you wanna reverse just put in the P and move to the right and you got tge R😮
Looks like a great car!! Of course it does… it’s a Mazda. They are building great vehicles these days.
They've being building reliable vehicles since the 1970s.
@@ravipeiris4388 true, but they have always felt flimsy. I drove my neighbor’s in 79 and didn’t like the handling and feel. Reliable, but not to my liking. I drove one recently and it really felt like a high end car. Still a bit flimsy feeling compared to American and European, but that’s a Japanese thing I’m not crazy about. However, they feel way better than they have in the past.
The back doors do in fact open with keyless entry, you just have to go into the settings first.
That’s one nice CX-70.
😄😐😐
😂
The CX-70 doesn’t come with a third row….
@@Redix9that’s the joke, are you just slow?
@@XChronicHashi don’t get the joke
Wish Mazda had spent the time and energy on a truly next-gen CX5 with updated tech and a hybrid option.
Give it time. CX-50 Hybrid for 2025, and new CX-5 eventually coming.
What's up with the IR sensor on the center screen @12:12? What is that for? 👀
It's for a feature called Driver Attention Alert. The vehicle monitors the driver for signs of distraction or drowsiness and will alert them accordingly.
I agree with Evie ...the CX-90 looks great in white. And, I like the black interior with the tan-colored stripe. Also, the black interior has grey-stained wood that looks better. I don't like anything that is beige-and-white such as the leather and wood in your tester. It is wood, isn't it?
Micah and family, what about the engine and associated (regular) maintenance? belts, pumps, plugs, etc.? I hear the I6 might need a lot of "engine out" for some serviceable items...
Can you direct me to where you heard this? I’m looking to buy a CX90.
10 am Sunday is Micah Time
Clunky shifts seems to be common with many of the reviewers on the CX-90
It's been much improved by software update. He may have one with updated software already.
I love my CX90 PHEV, but sometimes the clunkiness is annoying. Even at highway speeds you sometimes get a clunk that is so pronounced it sometimes feels as if the vehicle got bumped. However, the remarkable gas mileage makes up for it.
Great video!
Stunner!! 😮😮😮😮
I own the Preffered Plus CX 90. The only things I would have liked on my vehicle are mirror mounted garage door opener and seat memory buttons, neither of which is critically important to me.
Recently had a Preferred Plus loaner. I also would have preferred to have an XM radio (however I had the app). Also, not having a 360 camera it really needs front and rear sensors.
Anyone else getting a whole bunch of Tesla Ads all of a sudden? I don't ever remember seeing any Tesla ads until the last couple of weeks.
I haven't tried it, but typically for the transmission to shift into Park when you accidentally leave it in R and open the door the seat belt has to be unbuckled.
7:20 can this be a test you do on every vehicle??
Zack and and Andrea from Motormouth test drove this and Andrea loves Mazda but both did complain about the transmission and it seems that it may need to get a software update because of the jerkiness.
Theres nothing wrong with the transmission. I have this exact car with the tan leather
Software update is already out there. They don't like the heavy steering but I love it. Funny they keep mentioning they had a Cayenne and loved it but Cayenne has heavy steering too. I have both Cayenne and CX-90 and love steering on both.
Cx 90s have been brought in for a transmission update. Thats probably why it feels better not because of the inline 6.
I noticed the same distinction between the inline 6 and the hybrid on the CX-90 launch event after driving both back-to-back. There are powertrain tuning peculiarities with the hybrid that aren't present with the non-hybrid I6.
Nice CX70 with a 3rd row you got there!!!
CX-70 doesn’t come with a third row…
@@Redix9flew right over you...
@@Redix9, you keep missing the joke.
WHAT IS THE JOKE
@@gustavmahler3228 , that everyone knows the CX-70/90 are essentially the same vehicle. The 70 just deletes the 3rd row. Plus a few cosmetic tweaks.
Man that non-PRNDL shifter is scary. I could see someone getting hurt by that.
7:20 you put it on the engine cover not on the engine that cover isnt attached to the actual motor lol
At 4:33, did you call it CX-9?
Geez. I did! 🤦♂️ Slip of the tongue.
I disagree strongly about the fabric on the dash. I happen to be in the textile industry and know it is a very high-quality high-performance fabric. It doesn't look cheap at all to me. Material selection is what makes this competitive with luxury brands.
Micah what will be cool is Mazda have their sport brand name like Honda Type r. Mazda should have their suv sport name and the horsepower and torque will be 380 HP and 425 torque. And the towing capacity should be 7,500 every other car will be like omg wow
As usual, great review.
I can't wait for the family to review the new Hyundai Santa Fe
Good stuff
Did anyone hear about the latest recall? What do you think?
No
Yes, something to do with the steering.
Micah can you please review the TX?
We won't get to drive one until early April but yes, we have a TX scheduled.
My old 1995 Jeep Wrangler with an I6 was a torque MONSTAH
You told us to leave you a comment if you forget something. Well, there's one thing. You forgot to mention another competitor in its price segment which is the Nissan Pathfinder which I find to be a better looking SUV.
Definitely the cx70 not falling for your tricks this time Micah
🤫
I want this i6 engine in the Miata.
water pump is on the back...just remember that
How is this compare with MDX?
I think it compares extremely well. I actually chose the CX90 over the MDX. Any Premium Plus model will give you most of the features of an Advance Model CX90 for anywhere from 5-10 thousand dollars less.
It is a nice SUV but if I am getting a mid size 3 row I'd want more cargo space and legroom.
Leg room is fine in the front and second row. Becomes more cramped in the third row but how many times are people really traveling around with 5 plus adults in a vehicle?
I hate the captain chairs in the second row
Looking Chic 👍🏼
I wonder if the bikini influencer made a comment on their instagram, “hey there goes Micah Muzio & Co in a car review!”
Cool SUV, Cooler sunglasses! 🕶️
How is the leg room on the driver side? I have a CX-9 and my legs dig into the side of the door. Is there more room?
I'm a former CX-9 owner and test drove the 90 yesterday. It definitely has more room in the front seat especially the width, but aside from that, it feels much smaller than the competition.
Technically its really a wagon.....no true SUV pretenses whatsoever. That being said...Mazda builds quality vehicles and this is one of them.....Drove it compared to many others....Ended up getting a 23' Santa Fe 2.5t Calligraphy instead. Thanks for the great content as always.
I Absolutely hate the back of this car … I’d you are looking at it from the back it looks like a minivan , that egg shell back is terrible. I was so hoping the 70 they would have slanted that down … but no it’s a cx90 with third row delete ! Lol thanks for the review ! New sub here !
The humpback is hideous.
Most Asia cars I notice back windows don’t go the whole way down
Beautiful vehicle
Hey y’all I miss the frenetic “la-di-da” phase Micah went through a couple years ago. Think it will repeat? 😉
Now that you've reminded, I think it could. :)
Enjoy what they’ve done with the front end styling on these new models, but I think they lose some appeal the further you move towards the rear end.
I generally like the interior design (lack of piano black is much appreciated), and don’t mind the media control dial; you can get used to it. I think it’s way more user friendly than the laptop-style mousepad on the Acura.
Biggest gripe with the interior is probably the cargo area. Didn’t seem that wide or spacious for how large the car is, and the seats (much like my CX-5) don’t provide the flattest loading platform once folded. The CX-70 looks better in this regard, which you’d expect given the lack of 3rd row. Kind of odd it’s almost the same car aside from that distinction.
I have to wonder if most people shopping for an actual family hauler will seriously be considering a CX-90 anyway. It doesn’t have that great of a third row, they probably won’t care as much about the driving performance oriented powertrain, and the pricing of the higher trims will start to look pretty unattractive. Outside of brand loyalty shoppers, I can see family buyers preferring a grand highlander, pilot, palisade, or perhaps even the new sante fe.
I was so excited for this CX-90. But when we drove it, I had my teenage boys sit in the third row and knew it wouldn't work. we went with the grand highlander.
@@kfc_hackeye That only makes sense to me. Appears as though Toyota had a more focused mission/target audience for the Grand Highlander as a family hauler with some guts. Meanwhile, the CX-90 may be their largest car, but that doesn’t make it inherently a great option for families. I’m not in need of a family hauler, so look at it a little differently, but if I was, I would be cross shopping pretty hard.
Mazda Metallic reds are stunning and this one is no different. It does, however, looks like it’s been run through 40,000 automatic car washes. Somebody please correct that paint! 😢
as a person with a mazda 6 with the crystal soul metallic, i feel ya pain ... piant chips so easily 😢
It sounds like a little premature extrapolation on Mazda's part...you test drive proves that its not quite ready for prime time yet. That's a miss as their "first ever" PHEV and inline 6 should have been launched when it was fully ready. Also, I have a 2023 CX-5 Turbo and I agree with your comments - the car just nags too much! Thanks for another great, clear and unbiased review. Cheers from Canada ... Jim
well, German cars nag too, and if Mazda is trying to be German, well, they are only following who they want to be like... former GTI owner so familiar with VW nagging features
I like the look of the cx90, but I'm unlikely to ever see one in the metal. I'm on the wrong side of the Atlantic. I agree that light colours are better.
I thought they sell a variant of it in Europe - CX80? Not exactly the same, but similar or so I have read
@triaxe-mmb there's a cx60, but it's smaller. I've not heard of cx80.
@@owenmcdonald5922 I just read an article - it's going to be a 3 row version of the cx60. Coming out in the summer or so
Soooooo, will we be testing cars with an actual baby seat any time soon? 😉
Asking for a friend. 🤣
As a Maybach driver, I utilize my 2008 Honda CRV as my daily driver. I'm going to purchase this vehicle for Mazda's reliability, the car's good looks and resale value ❤.
How that shifter got approved in this day and age.....wow.
Always fun! "Animal style", lol.
Love it
I just watch your reviews to see your wife😂😂😂
Hard disagree with Evie about the color. No better red than Mazda red. Also, that dash piece looks like it's made of the cupholders they give you at a coffee shop.
If you're reviewing a family car, you really should be commenting on the AC in the back, or lack thereof in this case as there's only 2 tiny vents at the back of the front center consol... no way my teens are going to think that's enough AC on a 100F day. I don't understand why ALL suvs don't have AC in the ceiling!
You're right about rear ventilation. It's amazing how many vehicles we drive don't have any adjustable rear vents. We typically try to note their absence but don't always succeed. Good thought about ceiling vents. I know its a design pain for car makers but we love vehicles that have them.
The comments mention 70? So is it 90 or 70?
It’s a 90 that Micah is showing. However, recently Mazda revealed the 70, and majority of people said it looks exactly the same as the 90 with third-row deleted. The dimensions are almost exactly the same as well. That’s why people make jokes about. The CX70 is a nice suv, but I do have to agree with the majority that Mazda overhyped it, and the CX70 turns out to be dead on arrival because you’re better off with the CX90 so that you have more space and features with the third row just in case of the emergency.
@@joecrash1232thank you for taking the times out to reply. Good to know. Thank you!
@@Henry-sj1kl you’re very welcome
$60K 😳
Family growth means getting this instead of sedan.... or the bmw headache
When was the last time kiddo had a hard time getting into a car? 😅
Really nice car but these aren't selling well and already are on big discount in my area. After the CX-9 failed to compete, I understand why Mazda didn't learn the lesson that having below average cargo and third row space in one of the biggest (by exterior dimension) cars in the class wasn't a winning formula. Luxury and driving dynamics are important but for the three row family segment, utility is king and this falls on its face compared to the Pilot, Telluride, and Grand Highlander on those counts. It has almost exactly the same amount of space behind the first row as a CRV which is a full two size classes down and is miles behind something its competitors on max cargo space.
Never understand why Mazda would give this such a stupid shifter.. If they would have just given it a regular traditional shifter it would have been so MUCH better..
Recently test drove this. It’s pretty cramped and feels more like a car than a $54K+ three row SUV. I’m coming from a 2021 Honda Pilot and choosing the 2024 Pilot instead of the CX-90.
that's one of the worst rear window tests! Not even close to going all the way down. Do better Mazda!!
This is not mid-sized. It's 200 inches long. Like a BMW X7.
Ten years ago, it was yoga leggings in parkas. Today, it’s bikinis.
The one annoying thing about this Mazda is that horrible screechy sound coming from the front passenger seat
Made in Hiroshima❤
Stiff ride, clunky transmission, slow steering. It is like you make the sacrifices giving up comfort but you don't get much back in fun and sporty driving. But the platform has potential - Mazda just need to spend a bit more time fine-tuning the car.
Absolutely not. I have this and it's awesome. Transmission isn't clunky at all
This was the second vehicle that is co developed with Toyota... Notice all of their other vehicles up to date have had no significant issues from the factory
I own one, and I do wish they would have fine tuned it better. However, they have gradually been addressing all of the most concerning issues (which are mostly relatively minor).
However, that “slow” steering is so reassuring at highway speeds.
At 60k there are some very obvious issues. For one, that’s about the price of an Audi q7 or BMW X5. Both of those are going to have all doors with keyless access. And regardless of reliability, Mazda does not have the brand prestige to get away with those prices.
"Regardless of reliability." 😂 That's the most important factor.
Mazda has recently lowered the prices of all top trims (other than the PHEV) at least $4,000.00.
Also, any BMW or Mercedes at that price are not going to have ANY of the features you want.
mazda does no wrong!
It looks good but it's no Audi, BMW, or Mercedes like they're trying to promote.
I agree with you as the cars you listed aren't reliable and lose 80% of their value in less than 5 years. The Mazda is the superior vehicle.
IMO, I think this and much of their upcoming product mix is intended more as a Infiniti, Acura, Buick, maybe Genesis , and even lower trim Lexus, BMW, Audi, Merc fighter...it can't compete at the top of the product ranges in each class but this is a good first effort to me on paper...going to touch and feel it personally soon as I am considering it for the next Family hauler
You are right, it cannot match the sea of Piano Black in newest Audi and Mercedes models that reflect sunlight in just ever-so-perfect way to blind the driver and collect fingerprints. As for BMW, in latest models you are saying goodbye for some of physical Climate control buttons. I am glad Mazda went its own way and did not copycat all of the manufacturers above.
It's ok
I think this is a downgrade in looks from the CX 9
Mazda...boom boom
That color wood trim looks absolutely atrocious on camera. It looks yellow, sometimes with a hint of green, absolutely nasty. In person this has to look better???
Much better. Blonde wood.
Handsome looking car, nice interior and that is it. Lack of practicality and functionality, which are essentials of a 3 row suv, is killing this car. Who wants such a big car, when size dont bring you any benefit?? Mazda engineers fail again, after failing with CX9 with same reasons.
Too big
Anyone interested in this vehicle should definitely watch the car care nut review on it. You will probably change your mind pretty quickly.
I saw it, I have a 2005 ford explorer, replaced trasmission at 160k last year. I am hoping cx-90 trans last at least 150k. I have a vw eos and turbo still working fine at 105k. My only concern is how hard is to replace the spark plugs, water pump, tensioner or alternator..😁😁😁😁
... the i6 has water pump and belts on the back, like Audi....so simple mx items will/could require engine out service....
Have you seen or heard anyone backing up the car care nut guy and what he said? I know a few people that have Mazda CX9s with a lot of miles and they love them - the car care nut guy also does not like the CX9. I’m thinking about getting a CX90 - if you have more info let me know - thanks!
@@PTLUX15 cx9 is not the same as the cx90. You’re probably better off with the cx9 from a reliability standpoint
@@Jay-bw3fl I realize they are different CX9 vs CX90. It’s just that the car care nut also reviewed the CX9 and didn’t care for it as well. My take is his CX90 review was very harsh and his CX9 review was only harsh.
god that voice
Yeah, it’s pretty great for encouraging engagement in the comments. Thanks!
BMW X6🥲
Shut off car ..radio & phone calls bye bye?, as cx5, also remote start…open any door , engine bye bye..so dam annoying , in fact the entertainment system is intolerable
$60k for a Mazda 🤣
Y’all are insufferable
disagree
curious why you think that
You sound lovely on the other hand. /s
Micah what will be cool is Mazda have their sport brand name like Honda Type r. Mazda should have their suv sport name and the horsepower and torque will be 380 HP and 425 torque. And the towing capacity should be 7,500 every other car will be like omg wow.