Doug Stanhope on Monogamy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лют 2013

КОМЕНТАРІ • 118

  • @lisvender
    @lisvender 6 років тому +31

    “Somehow, I’m a winner!” is one of Stanhope’s best lines.

  • @grozwald
    @grozwald 10 років тому +82

    "...and then they hire a lawyer and sue him for half his fish!"

    • @MrCooCoo4crack
      @MrCooCoo4crack 6 років тому +1

      Mr. Super Nintendo Chalmers that part dead my dying

  • @KnivingDispodia
    @KnivingDispodia 3 роки тому +15

    Why he lookin like a GTA V loading screen?

  • @casperado666
    @casperado666 8 років тому +29

    "i tricked you, you shouldn't be doing this at all!"
    lost it, so fucking true.

  • @Whitedennisrodman
    @Whitedennisrodman 6 років тому +74

    I've had a lot of people unfriend me on facebook by posting this video on "new relationship" statuses..

  • @shawnc666
    @shawnc666 7 років тому +8

    I was told by a Philosophy Professor one time that, there is no such thing as Unconditional Love. His given definition of Love by humans....which is conditional: "Love is the feeling that two people get when mutual needs are met"....
    Once one of those needs go unfulfilled, whether it be monogamy, or that you are poor and can't provide financially....whatever the need is.....once is goes unfulfilled....eventually that person will leave.....period.....

    • @williamstorm9339
      @williamstorm9339 4 роки тому

      I love people unconditionally on some level. However for a friendship or relationship I want my needs met.

    • @laaaliiiluuu
      @laaaliiiluuu 8 місяців тому

      ​@@williamstorm9339but why do you love them unconditionally? Once you have that answer you will realize it doesn't exist.

  • @johnnysullivan436
    @johnnysullivan436 4 роки тому +10

    The sheer amount of great material that Stanhope turns out puts him in a class by himself

  • @bullshi4258
    @bullshi4258 8 років тому +35

    I think love is a symptom of an overall mechanism that compels animals to breed to further the species; monogamy is a tool to ensure survival of the offspring. There is just correlation.

    • @elekkr
      @elekkr 5 років тому +4

      monogamy is forced because of the private property economic system it is absolutely unnatural and the source of all kind of mental physical emotional dysfunction for the participants we know this since Freud . People get suckered in since there is no alternative accepted by anyone for reasons of surviwal and propagation purposes . You got to be completely outside of the mental paradigm of the world Haha you got to be clever good looking independent and constantly on the hunt to be outside of the paradigm . It is not easy but sure there is a payoff and fun . But most of the people have no talent for .

    • @ThisNameIsG
      @ThisNameIsG 4 роки тому

      @@elekkr Any proof? Or are you talking out of your arse?

    • @blop-a-blop9419
      @blop-a-blop9419 4 роки тому +1

      Is your comment a continuation of your Pseudo + Profile picture combo ?

    • @blop-a-blop9419
      @blop-a-blop9419 4 роки тому

      If you say monogamy is naturally logical, this might apply to the 3% of animals that are monogamous, but how about the not 3% ? Aka 97% ...

    • @TheFattestBlunt.
      @TheFattestBlunt. 3 роки тому +1

      Hard to believe people were still this edgy 5 years ago

  • @maxcast1234567890
    @maxcast1234567890 9 років тому +11

    One on the best bits of his life '' from across the street'' the best album of dark comedy!

  • @DavidKarlsson-ti6sb
    @DavidKarlsson-ti6sb 2 роки тому +2

    Some of us find that girl. Best of luck Doug. Love you man.

  • @katherineellinghame
    @katherineellinghame 6 років тому +4

    I LOVE that this is put under the category of "education" in the description. I just wonder where the rest is. I need to finish laughing please!😂

  • @satiethetutor3337
    @satiethetutor3337 9 років тому +12

    The dude really started thinking like a penguin there!

  • @malcolmnicoll1165
    @malcolmnicoll1165 9 років тому +1

    So true! Thanks for posting!

  • @jklxn
    @jklxn 8 років тому +5

    damn, this would have been the shit to see stanhope actually goin thru the penguin motions....

  • @turi-geza
    @turi-geza 7 років тому +1

    Great stuff : D

  • @DocMortsnarg
    @DocMortsnarg Рік тому

    I'm just here for the penguins 🐧

  • @AperturePowered
    @AperturePowered 10 років тому +11

    He's comparing pleasure with happiness, which Aristotle broke down pretty effectively, I laughed my ass off, put I just feel like providing some outside perspective.

    • @AperturePowered
      @AperturePowered 9 років тому

      ***** did not know that. Is hedonism different?

    • @AperturePowered
      @AperturePowered 9 років тому +2

      ***** "Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that pleasure is the primary or most important intrinsic good." - Good joke though.

  • @DevilDude912
    @DevilDude912 10 років тому +4

    I'm trying to figure out why the part about the lawyer and suing the penguin for half his fish is the part that actually made me lol.

    • @351cleavland
      @351cleavland 10 років тому +4

      The best part of humor is when someone explains the joke(makes it even funier!)-so here it goes-Doug is spinning the story very quickly and the audience (us) is listening and keeping up so as not to miss anything. The "all his fish" is the end part and it is a summary of someone who is getting the consequence for the whole of his actions. At the same time the audience is getting the whole of the story wrapped up and Doug finally takes a breath, which means the audience gets to exhale laughter. He's damn refined as as a performer!

    • @klakurkajan
      @klakurkajan 10 років тому +1

      351cleavland

  • @charliethegent
    @charliethegent 6 років тому +2

    someone fucking animate this

  • @plasticdadaii8225
    @plasticdadaii8225 7 років тому +1

    Hilarious!!!!!!!!!

  • @StLennyBruce
    @StLennyBruce 5 років тому +3

    "I don't care anymore about fuckin' so much." Love it!

  • @BubbaZen10
    @BubbaZen10 10 років тому +14

    Is there really that much difference between a really hot penguin and an ugly penguin?

    • @Maddolis
      @Maddolis 10 років тому +30

      There is in the morning.

    • @StanzyBoi
      @StanzyBoi 10 років тому +2

      there is if your fucking it.

    • @bullshi4258
      @bullshi4258 8 років тому +7

      +BubbaZen10 Oh you fucking racist, "all penguins look the same" is that what you are saying!?

    • @BubbaZen10
      @BubbaZen10 8 років тому +1

      hahahaha!!!

    • @BubbaZen10
      @BubbaZen10 8 років тому +1

      Bull Shi I just like that i only got 3 "plusses" , and the dude who commented got 25!!!! ;)
      (to be fair, his was much funnier)

  • @JensHove
    @JensHove 6 років тому

    Few hours.

  • @gaylandbarney2231
    @gaylandbarney2231 5 років тому +3

    stanhope has damned near ruined me , can't listen with glee to other comics now

  • @kourii
    @kourii 5 років тому +1

    Killin' me with that penguin shit, Doug

  • @stiiimes
    @stiiimes 3 роки тому +1

    Half his fish 😪

  • @spleen5527
    @spleen5527 8 років тому +9

    Brilliant, half his fish.

  • @jazztom86
    @jazztom86 6 років тому +2

    why do I have the strong feeling that penguin story is actually an autobiographical metaphor?

  • @inspiredau5878
    @inspiredau5878 6 років тому +6

    Its been 5 years and i still get that animal lust. The victory is keeping that person interested even after all of that time.

    • @drosophilamelanogaster3957
      @drosophilamelanogaster3957 Рік тому

      It's been another 5 years since you posted; do you mind giving us an update?

    • @inspiredau5878
      @inspiredau5878 Рік тому +1

      Thanks for asking! You know Love is such a misused, and yet such an underused word in our world. You never really know what it means to someone else just by saying it. So this music will update you, and communicate what this love means to me better and more poetically than I ever could. ua-cam.com/video/ObG48PZHU2k/v-deo.html

  • @Tommyfazz
    @Tommyfazz 6 років тому +1

    Post break-up sex: My apologies to: Carmen. Lynn. Gill. Paula. Tracey. Valerie. Veronica. Veronica's sister. Connie. Liz1 & Liz2. Sue. Alicia. Mary Loo. Angelica.
    Paulina. Margo and Margo's mum. Chow.
    ps - my neighbours either side and the woman who's dog I tripped over outside Tesco.
    Sorry
    Chow.

  • @griesrt
    @griesrt 6 років тому

    that laugh after "she put an emoticon" LOL :54

  • @OK2BCK
    @OK2BCK 9 років тому +1

    we should start again

  • @malcolmnicoll1165
    @malcolmnicoll1165 4 роки тому +2

    So true. Every word. Doug's a national treasure.

  • @muddyharrison1616
    @muddyharrison1616 5 років тому

    You can really hear the audience its so sickk!!

  • @jamesbright2403
    @jamesbright2403 8 років тому

    haha, I forgot this one

  • @extraterrestrial16
    @extraterrestrial16 4 роки тому +1

    It is overall control for men... That's all it is hehe

  • @richardhines8622
    @richardhines8622 9 років тому +6

    Sue him for half his fish - Great line .

  • @CHRISDABAHIA
    @CHRISDABAHIA 6 років тому

    Yes....

  • @justthetruth247
    @justthetruth247 4 роки тому +1

    This is spot on. I've been in "love" and done so much love making & fucking in relationships and while single...after 25+ years of the sex rollercoaster i understand Doug Stanhope on this 💯 Genius

  • @37Dionysos
    @37Dionysos 6 років тому

    Three sheets to the wind!

  • @blinkth3dog
    @blinkth3dog 6 років тому +2

    monogamy is perfectly.natural.

  • @37Dionysos
    @37Dionysos 4 роки тому +2

    When the original thrill is gone and it all seems the same, maybe it's time to step up and be a full creative partner? Or you can hang around in bars.

  • @36hounddogg
    @36hounddogg 7 років тому

    8 guys got sued for half their fish

  • @LukeGeoDude
    @LukeGeoDude 7 років тому +5

    Wolves are monogamous.

    • @LepusZeppelin
      @LepusZeppelin 7 років тому +8

      3:21

    • @ur-nammu
      @ur-nammu 3 місяці тому

      Sort of. They practice primarily serial monogamy (one partner after another throughout their lives), but during mating season, it isn't that abnormal for a horny wolf to fuck a coyote or a dog or a wolf from another pack.

  • @ninokwim7700
    @ninokwim7700 3 роки тому

    you're just doing it wrong

  • @CHRISDABAHIA
    @CHRISDABAHIA 6 років тому

    Twice

  • @georgewbushcenterforintell147
    @georgewbushcenterforintell147 4 роки тому

    What a closer he needs to right kids books .

  • @JABS991
    @JABS991 6 років тому +1

    Not puke on her back sick.
    ... but close sometimes.

  • @spiritfree5050
    @spiritfree5050 4 роки тому +1

    1:16 Single moms is becoming the Norm nowadays
    So I would say No
    unless your truly Beta
    Chad Chadingtons don't seem to fall in love at all

  • @aaronwest1055
    @aaronwest1055 8 років тому +16

    Love and dating is utter nonsense, monogamy is about nation building and the proper rearing of children and has absolutely nothing to do with this any of the aforementioned drivel. Monogamy isn't a "learned" behavior, what we've learned to do to ourselves, rather disastrously, is mix the concepts of monogamy and love. What typically happened is that you had a stable family unit with a wife that you got along with and a mistress that you had that passionate giddy feeling with. Sadly we've gotten rid of the idea of mistresses and now couples have to not only agree with one another in a business sense but also be loving towards each other. We've set ourselves up for failure is what we've done, and our divorce rates indicate as much.

    • @aaronwest1055
      @aaronwest1055 7 років тому

      Chibi Chan
      Society goes much farther back than the 20's? The 20's is kinda sorta around the time that all this bullshit started to go awry in the first place (the invention of dating). You're using a time frame that is still within the idea of mixing marriage and love, which is exactly what I'm saying is our problem.
      "Hitting a bitch" isn't exactly the answer that you're looking for in this situation either. The toppling of traditional gender roles, duties and authorities has more to do with mutual dependency and obligation and less to do with physical violence. True authority doesn't need to have a physical component, it is often necessary but not the main method of keeping authority. Read The Prince and educate yourself.

    • @aaronwest1055
      @aaronwest1055 7 років тому

      Chibi Chan Machiavelli's work delves deeply into power, the keeping of it and human nature, it most definitely can be applied to any situation in where a human being is attempting to maintain authority.
      When the fuck did I assert that the lack of mistresses was the root of the unbalance between the genders? Quote that at me, because that is ridiculous to accuse me of.

    • @aaronwest1055
      @aaronwest1055 7 років тому

      Chibi Chan Alright, you got me there, I clearly misspoke and or didn't make myself clear enough.

    • @malcolmnicoll1165
      @malcolmnicoll1165 7 років тому +2

      So true. Every word. For those reasons and more I've quietly joined the MGTOW Brotherhood.

    • @IntensePeppers
      @IntensePeppers 6 років тому

      A A Ron and Communism, you're both right