Sony a7S III Review: Best 'run and gun' camera available today?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лип 2024
  • The Sony a7S III captures great 4K video using its full sensor, and includes features like Sony's real-time autofocus and exceptional low light video performance. It may be the best 'run and gun' hybrid video camera on the market today.
    Music provided by BeatSuite.com
    www.beatsuite.com
    Rental equipment provided by The Camera Store
    www.thecamerastore.com
    -----------------------
    DPReview.com is the world's largest digital camera review website. Welcome to our UA-cam channel! Subscribe for new feature videos, reviews, interviews and more.
    Discover the world's most in-depth digital camera reviews at www.dpreview.com
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 422

  • @melaniegriesemer
    @melaniegriesemer 3 роки тому +46

    “You can hear me say that, but you need to see it in motion. FOLLOW ME CHRIS!” 🤣😂😂😂

  • @AuthenTech
    @AuthenTech 3 роки тому +25

    On the road to a million. Great video guys!

  • @sjhstone
    @sjhstone 3 роки тому

    Finally a comprehensive A7SIII review from Jordan and Chris. Nice first-time hair gel work.

  • @VideoLife_FPV_Wild
    @VideoLife_FPV_Wild Рік тому

    Great job on the review video for the Sony A7S3! Your brevity and inclusion of all essential characteristics made it a joy to watch. I especially appreciate that the length of the video was just right, not too long like other reviews that can drag on. Your clear and concise presentation style really helped me understand the key features and benefits of this camera. Thanks for sharing your insights and expertise with us. Keep up the excellent work!

  • @Maxime-ho9iv
    @Maxime-ho9iv 3 роки тому +2

    I watch those episodes on a 4K display.
    This is by far the best quality I've seen recently on this channel.

  • @intheblues
    @intheblues 3 роки тому +92

    8:27 😆

    • @picasary
      @picasary 3 роки тому +3

      Just paused the video and looking for this comment 😂

    • @MUSTDOS
      @MUSTDOS 3 роки тому +8

      @David Varner Around a year ago. They would let him in fetal position whenever the topic is not about video.

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 3 роки тому +6

      @@MUSTDOS ua-cam.com/video/S34Tp7czj74/v-deo.html

    • @DONNYLAI95
      @DONNYLAI95 3 роки тому

      I'm dead LMAO

    • @bryanchin856
      @bryanchin856 3 роки тому

      Olympus omd em5 mark iii review video was, I think, one of the first videos with that.

  • @milkod2001
    @milkod2001 3 роки тому +4

    Used this camera for 3 projects and here is a quick comparison to A73 I'm sure many be interested in.When it comes to video A7S3 is huge step up. Footage is much more smoother and 10bit gives you very organic colours straight from camera with zero grading in post.The best settings working for me is HS 4k 10bit 420 50/60p.No matter what settings you use make sure to go with 10bit colours.Difference is huge.About time Sony offered 10bit in prosumer cameras. I have used this camera exclusively with Crane 2S gimbal and I'm happy with results. There is also option to use this camera handheld,make sure to switch of steady shot.Camera will record some data from gyroscope sensor and you can use that to steady your footage in post using Catalyst Browser.In short this is only usable if you don.t have gimbal handy but results are nowhere near as good as when using gimbal.Overall A7S3 is excellent video camera if someone doesn't have 10grand for Red or other expensive pro grade camera system.

  • @AllThingsFilm1
    @AllThingsFilm1 3 роки тому +28

    "It's gross, so it's art." LOLOL

    • @thegrandnil764
      @thegrandnil764 3 роки тому

      Im getting this camera as a primarily stills photographer. I hate large megapixels, anything more than 25MP weighs down the process and is frankly unnesasary. I photograph caves, hard action at any time in the day, camping, and a whole ton of other shit. Low light is everything to me, form factor, battery life is everything, and the video features are an added benifit. I carry around a micro 10" laptop to edit on, fuck big fancy cameras.
      I want simple and well done.
      My shooting style, I almost never crop, and do as little to the images in post as possible, it's just my style. So I really dont loose anything, but gain everything in low light and video. This will also be insane for night photography.

  • @DeepteshLovesTECH
    @DeepteshLovesTECH 3 роки тому +25

    It's the most effortless camera for sure. Just performs! No excuses in any segment from high framerates, to incredible low light to AF performance. CLOSEST to the PERFECT CAMERA CROWN.

    • @MonicaHolly143
      @MonicaHolly143 3 роки тому +8

      *video camera

    • @JetBen555
      @JetBen555 3 роки тому +3

      @@MonicaHolly143 Unlimited RAW buffer with redundancy at 10fps and 90%+ hit rate is pretty cool though. 12mp is fine for most of the jobs out there, especially since everything ends up on the Internet anyway.

    • @MonicaHolly143
      @MonicaHolly143 3 роки тому +4

      @@JetBen555 if u think that 12mp is enough for a professional photographer then u clearly dont know what ur talking about......
      That's like saying 1080p is enough becuz they will downscale it to 1080p anyways and most use phones anyways

    • @TohPhimmasenh
      @TohPhimmasenh 3 роки тому +3

      @@MonicaHolly143 wait is 1080p not enough anymore ? Cause i still deliver my work in 1080p 😅😅

    • @MonicaHolly143
      @MonicaHolly143 3 роки тому +2

      @@TohPhimmasenh it is still okay but it is much better to shoot in 4k and deliver in 1080p
      There's a lot of video that explains how that works

  • @ConnorMcGaffey
    @ConnorMcGaffey 3 роки тому +1

    I think this might be my favorite camera channel.

  • @pelanth
    @pelanth 3 роки тому +25

    The UA-cam compression on this video was brutal. The blocks in the blacks looked like Minecraft.

    • @punkrachmaninoff
      @punkrachmaninoff 3 роки тому +10

      UA-cam and Instagram are the bottlenecks of our society.

    • @hisownfool1
      @hisownfool1 3 роки тому +5

      Doesn’t the limitations imposed by the compression call the utility of a camera like this into question? If the primary audience is going to watch this on UA-cam and mobile devices, isn’t this camera and others like it overkill? I wonder about this almost every time I watch these kinds of reviews.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому +2

      @@hisownfool1 it's overkill for many yes, but if you can afford then it delivers a lot, sharper 1080p, great AF, low light, selfie screen, good battery, unlimited recording, more fps 4k/hd, A7SIII is a video workhorse & does great for social media photography

    • @thecommenter578
      @thecommenter578 3 роки тому +4

      @@hisownfool1 yes but no. I mean, although it's compressed by youtube it still looks waaay better than any other video recorded on smartphones or GoPros

    • @hisownfool1
      @hisownfool1 3 роки тому

      @@mirrorlessny Thanks.

  • @youuuuuuuuuuutube
    @youuuuuuuuuuutube 3 роки тому +15

    2 small inaccuracies:
    1) at 2:48, you claim it's softer than the R5 and S1H, that's true at 24p, but not at 60p and especially not at 120p, because the other cameras have to resort to line skipping, which makes the image even a lot softer.
    2) 10:16, you claim the camera doesn't support dial in the ISO or the white balance, but actually it does, but Final Cut Pro X doesn't support it yet with the A7siii.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому +1

      wow great point 1) 👍 completely forgot about higher fps

    • @FantabMedia
      @FantabMedia 3 роки тому

      S1H doesn't use line skipping at 4k/60. It uses a 1:1 readout the same as the SIII and quality is about the same (SIII has advantage at high ISOs of course).

    • @FantabMedia
      @FantabMedia 3 роки тому +1

      @SwitchRich Yes but not line skipped.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      @@FantabMedia how bad is the crop?

  • @rdfilms.
    @rdfilms. 3 роки тому +1

    Such a great review!

  • @Tokyo_Views
    @Tokyo_Views 3 роки тому

    Sony A7Siii looks like a beast. Also loving your channel! Stay safe!

  • @stucarter
    @stucarter 3 роки тому +1

    Good talk, and you get to the points fast

  • @msamiullah001
    @msamiullah001 3 роки тому

    Jordan, looks like you packed alot of telephoto lenses for this video. Great stuff as always !!!

  • @tofulosophy
    @tofulosophy 3 роки тому +4

    Chris and Jordan: The Dynamic Duo!

  • @swaygfx
    @swaygfx 3 роки тому

    That SLog 3 👏🏽, definitely need this twice

  • @mervynmarshall7115
    @mervynmarshall7115 3 роки тому +2

    Jules et Jim Criterion - nice!

  • @ScottJWaldron
    @ScottJWaldron 3 роки тому

    Jordan's time to shine! Nice video. :)

  • @rollor
    @rollor 3 роки тому

    thank you for sharing. liked and subscribed.

  • @OlintoeRafaelaCicloturismo
    @OlintoeRafaelaCicloturismo 3 роки тому

    Much better with gel! I also use when I am in camera...:) Great job guys! Best regards from Brazil.

  • @S4RWS
    @S4RWS 3 роки тому

    Great review...

  • @Georgie_B_
    @Georgie_B_ Рік тому

    Loved this review, thanks! Was just wondering how many stops did you over-expose by for s-log? Thanks!

  • @hcl8836
    @hcl8836 3 роки тому +2

    The missing raw options are not an issue of the a7S III ... it's the host software you use to edit Prores RAW. Scratch already has options for white balance and ISO on Prores RAW. So it's up to Premiere or Final Cut to also implement this options.

  • @wtfnahmean
    @wtfnahmean 3 роки тому +4

    5:03 I want to add something about the codec. On Final Cut Pro, XAVC HS files are easy to edit, as long as you pick 10bit 4:2:0. If you go for 10bit 4:2:2, both XAVC HS and XAVC S codecs are very slow. I've tested this on multiple generations of iMacs and MBPs; doesn't matter if the machine has the T2 chip (which claims to do HEVC decoding), the speed is always dependent on the processor.

  • @TravisVarga
    @TravisVarga 3 роки тому

    Great video. After a few months of use..yup. its the run and gun king.

  • @truesounddesign
    @truesounddesign 3 роки тому +1

    Very informative video about my favorite camera! Thank you!
    One suggestion: when you’re comparing high ISO performance, don’t keep both your shutter speed and aperture static. Instead, first get a good exposure with the lowest ISO you can. Then as you raise the ISO, keep the SAME overall exposure by compensating with shutter speed or aperture. That way, we can see a difference in noise in the shadows. Simply making a dark image progressively brighter by boosting ISO (see 10:36) doesn’t show us much about noise performance. Thank you for considering this suggestion.

  • @DanielHodotcom
    @DanielHodotcom 3 роки тому

    great video - thank you!

  • @tannersheppard9651
    @tannersheppard9651 3 роки тому

    So excited to see you guys review the Canon C70, even though there's a price gap I would love to see how this camera competes with it.

  • @ChristopherPutvinski
    @ChristopherPutvinski 3 роки тому +4

    The footage looks so good. Wasn't going to upgrade from Gh5/GH5s, but I think I have to now

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому +1

      a giant upgrade 💪 perfect time to switch to Sony, they finally made new touch menu, A7SIII satisfies so many needs at same time like vlogging, color editing possibilities & even 4k slow motion

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому +1

      @@mirrorlessny 🔥

  • @limestone_xyz
    @limestone_xyz 3 роки тому +2

    Sony is hitting the nail on the head. The future is not in photo, but in video capabilities in a small body.
    This camera was not designed with the average photographer in mind, rather with the semi professional videographer in mind.
    And imo that's exactly the right direction they are heading.

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +1

      Now all they need to make is the A7iv, with the perfect balance between powerful photos, and good enough low-light video.
      Although I think Sony's gonna wait till Canon comes out with something new/adventurous before taking a dump on them with the A7iv.

    • @Davitor1
      @Davitor1 3 роки тому

      @@professionalpotato4764 which Sony camera can do 8K? And if you say no one needs 8K then you’re just another Sony fanboy making excuses.

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому

      @@Davitor1 Nobody needs 8k. Does Arri shoot 8k? You either have really bad composition skills or you're working on a project worth hundreds of thousands or millions. Composition can be learned. High budget filmmaking is only done by the elites. 90% of us will never be able to be part of it. Majority of media consumption is on phones or laptops. The number of people who own 8k monitors are even fewer than those with 4k monitors.
      I'm no fanboy. I use whatever works. I hate Sony because they clearly have zero UI/UX designers. I like Canon because it's the most user friendly. I like Nikon because it has better dynamic range than Canon. If I had unlimited money, I would switch systems every single day or hour depending on the job. The camera is just a tool. Stop assuming someone is in another "faction" just because their opinions and needs don't align with yours. The world doesn't revolve around you. Get over yourself.

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому

      @@Davitor1 And nobody brings toys to a real shoot. Any camera that overheats is not considered pro-grade. The R5 and 6 take amazing stills. But even if you gave it to me for free with every single RF lens, I still wouldn't use it for a video shoot.

    • @Davitor1
      @Davitor1 3 роки тому

      @@professionalpotato4764 no professional uses a 12mp camera made in Thailand. With menus of the 1980’s. You’re just another scrub UA-camr.

  • @liaminwales
    @liaminwales 3 роки тому +1

    I feel old, proxy workflows used to be normal yet now it seems to be the exception ?
    cool looking camera, any chance of how well it handles old lens ? some of the older Sony cameras had trouble thanks to aggressive filters in front of the sensor.

  • @meyer2278
    @meyer2278 3 роки тому

    Accurate points Chris.

  • @daycreek
    @daycreek 3 роки тому +1

    I've had very good success at editing XAVC HS footage if you use 420 vs 422. I've tested the heck out of both 420 and 422 and can't for the life of me detect any meaningful difference in color rendering even with blue sky using SLOG3. The bottom line is I have been shooting everything in XAVC HS 420 with the A7SIII and it edits beautifully on a 3-year old iMac using Davinci Resolve and I don't think I am missing anything by using 420.

  • @terranborn56
    @terranborn56 3 роки тому +2

    For moviemaking, I find the slight softness at 4K a plus. Less need to use a gaussian blur in post.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому +1

      @Mat Gleeson thank you for pointing this out guys

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому +1

      But the a7s III does not produce soft images. A tiffen black pro mist 1/8 would come in handy.

    • @terranborn56
      @terranborn56 3 роки тому +1

      @@JonPais OK, but looking at the test samples in this review, they are softer than the 8K/6K oversampled images.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      @@terranborn56 yea a7siii is softer, but that's only at 24fps 4k right? 4k60+ fps things even out? if im not mistaking S1H has apsc crop at 4k60 while R5 line skips at 4k60/120

    • @terranborn56
      @terranborn56 3 роки тому +1

      @@mirrorlessny Yes, 4K 24p for movie making, not reality shows or travel videos.
      Specific need.

  • @antonpena7978
    @antonpena7978 3 роки тому

    i really enjoyed this Video 👌

  • @educatetube
    @educatetube 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks Jordan for the honest review. To summarize, Sony a7siii is an excellent run & gun video camera but for serious short film maker, Panasonic S1h or perhaps the soon-to-be-released FX6 will be a better choice for independent filmmakers. I am waiting for FX6 and will decide between S1h and FX6 or maybe Sony a7siii. For me, it is about the colour science. If FX6 offer Venice colour science with the capability of Sony a7siii, I will buy it for sure.

  • @NafisAhmed73
    @NafisAhmed73 3 роки тому

    great video

  • @dmisha5437
    @dmisha5437 3 роки тому

    That Isaac cosplay was great!

  • @tomariko
    @tomariko 3 роки тому

    French TV just used it with a 1.4 to shoot an interview of Carlos Ghosn. This is how good this camera is. Can't get wrong with it.

  • @rollingchilling
    @rollingchilling 3 роки тому

    nice. liked and subscribed.

  • @parbatghale6701
    @parbatghale6701 3 роки тому +1

    My next camera

  • @KrunoslavStifter
    @KrunoslavStifter 3 роки тому +9

    Couldn't you guys find something where Slog-3 actually makes sense to shoot with? These are fairly low demanding shots where custom flat profile is more than enough. You need to do some real estate indoor work and capture those actual 13 stops of dynamic range to make sense to shoot with Slog-3. Otherwise its more work than it should be, with no real benefits.

    • @Jthe5th
      @Jthe5th 3 роки тому +1

      Definitely, it was rather disappointing there were no serious scenes to test the Slog-3

    • @KrunoslavStifter
      @KrunoslavStifter 3 роки тому

      @@Jthe5th Yup.

  • @andreasbuder4417
    @andreasbuder4417 3 роки тому +3

    I am surprised you didn’t mention the dual ISO at 12800, which is incredibly useful. The static AF problem is annoying though, because most of the time I want to be static, but also have the freedom to move spontaneously (maybe take a few stops forward or lean forward when sitting). Seems only to affect S-Log, though.

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому

      that’s why it’s best run n gun, not stand still n gun. 😅

    • @rsmith02
      @rsmith02 3 роки тому +2

      @What Are You On About No, the other way around.

    • @andreasbuder4417
      @andreasbuder4417 3 роки тому +1

      @What Are You On About Other way round.

  • @tonyzhu403
    @tonyzhu403 3 роки тому +18

    181K Subs? We are well past that, eh?

    • @CarlBergsdorf
      @CarlBergsdorf 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah the numbers don’t add up. They have 272K now so 8000 subs is not even 281K even tho it’s close.

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 3 роки тому +4

      Sorry, mistyped 281000.

  • @KiinaSu
    @KiinaSu 3 роки тому

    Really hope Jordan will make a video when Prores RAW for the Olympus EM1X and Mark 3 will arrive.

  • @akhyarrayhka4048
    @akhyarrayhka4048 3 роки тому +2

    a7siii lowlight is the best reason for me that make me love it. with f1.4 wide angle lens it'll be a nice astrophotography camera.

    • @TaipeiGeek
      @TaipeiGeek 3 роки тому

      The low light part looked terrible. Watch again at 10:42, he looks like a chocolate fondue.

    • @TohPhimmasenh
      @TohPhimmasenh 3 роки тому +3

      @@TaipeiGeek did you even see how under exposed it was ? That would never happen in real client's work

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +2

      You'll need higher mp count for astro. The problem with 12mp sensors is that the noise will be rendered in larger spots, vs finer grain on higher mp sensors.
      Also, the way lowlight is handled for video and photos are different. Videos are essentially jpegs stuffed into a video container, after applying some in camera denoise and other functions. Photo raws are different, and if you apply the same denoise that aggressively, I think you'll miss quite a few stars.

    • @lionellow105
      @lionellow105 3 роки тому

      @@TaipeiGeek When the beginer finally finds out that astrophotography uses long exposures so you wont actually see the "fondue" like in the video

  • @jesseyules
    @jesseyules 3 роки тому +7

    All the new cameras in 2019 / 2020 are great. No more excuses creatives.

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +1

      I am poor. It'll take me at least a year or two to build a full-frame kit with body, lenses, and lights.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому +2

      @@professionalpotato4764 apsc cameras like a6300/a6100 & up are much more affordable & produce fantastic results with prime lenses like Sigma 1.4

    • @squirreldemon3506
      @squirreldemon3506 3 роки тому +2

      It's not the camera but the Lenses that give me trouble lol.

    • @jesseyules
      @jesseyules 3 роки тому

      @@squirreldemon3506 I recommend trying out Sigma art lenes between 20mm - 35mm and just picking one. Many great movies have been shot with one lens.

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +1

      @@mirrorlessny True. For personal use idm getting those. But for work, I will need the ff cos I've no idea what kind of locations I may end up in and need the high iso performance.

  • @brich3368
    @brich3368 3 роки тому +1

    7:51 @DPReviewTV, which lens are you using in this shot, the bokeh looks amazing.

    • @TheHarleyH
      @TheHarleyH 3 роки тому

      I was thinking the same.

  • @dallatorretdu
    @dallatorretdu 3 роки тому +2

    HS 4:2:0 edits beautifully real-time on medium-big systems, it's my favourite format now

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      premiere pro? I read somewhere 4 2 0 10bit edits easier than 4 2 2 10bit

    • @dallatorretdu
      @dallatorretdu 3 роки тому +1

      @@mirrorlessny I use Resolve.
      Yes 10 bit 4:2:0 is natively decided by good graphics cards! 8,10 and even 12 bits

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      ​@@dallatorretdu wonder if there are vid cards that support 4 2 2

    • @dallatorretdu
      @dallatorretdu 3 роки тому +1

      @@mirrorlessny quadros do not. As RXT 2000 and 3000 they support 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 is forgotten.
      Somebody messaged me that Radeon 6000 series do decode H265 no matter the subsamples 😱

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      @@dallatorretdu wow that is interesting, H265 needs GPU help :) + 6800xt got 16gb ram

  • @SuperRicky1974
    @SuperRicky1974 3 роки тому +2

    I’ve upgraded to the Sony a7s3 and love it. But for a video camera I don’t know why they don’t have shutter angle instead of shutter speed. If Sony would ad waveforms, shutter angle and an audio safety track recorded 20db lower then this would be the perfect camera for me.

  • @TruthReviews
    @TruthReviews Рік тому

    I just ordered three mainly for their autofocus as I sometimes shoot events where I have to man all three cameras. If I film people sat down and use S cinetone am I likely to have issues? This is the first video I saw mention this. Has me a bit worried.

  • @Hikikomori34
    @Hikikomori34 3 роки тому +31

    11:13 TONEH

  • @dimanKu
    @dimanKu 3 роки тому +1

    have been using it for 1 month, video AFC still much slower then it's photo AFC....even set to max speed. But all and all still best camera for video

  • @the_matchless
    @the_matchless 3 роки тому

    Awesome 👍

  • @kian8382
    @kian8382 3 роки тому

    Hi Jordan is there AF on in MF mode on the A7c? Thank you.

  • @vlcthefish
    @vlcthefish 3 роки тому +11

    Can we take a moment to bow our heads in silence for the fact that the weather in Calgary is so bad that it they have full winter jackets and snow on the ground. Yuck it looks like January.

    • @psoon04286
      @psoon04286 3 роки тому

      You mean you have to wait till January to enjoy all that fun winter stuff........you should move to Canada.....Yay

    • @vlcthefish
      @vlcthefish 3 роки тому +1

      @@psoon04286 lmao yes thats one way of looking at it!

  • @aldo.brustenghi
    @aldo.brustenghi Рік тому

    Hi Have you tried filming the aurora with this camera, I have seen many aurora videos allegedly filmed with this camera, my concern is how far did they crank the iso up and how much did the videos rely on video editing.
    I would much appreciate your opinion as I am considering buying one but it's a lot of bucks so I want to be sure it will produce good aurora footage.

  • @tonylouisvisionvideography3469
    @tonylouisvisionvideography3469 3 роки тому +1

    This camera looks impressive

  • @ChannyTao
    @ChannyTao 3 роки тому

    Probably one of the best Sony camera ever

  • @fsLUXE
    @fsLUXE 2 роки тому

    @4:29 pg 30 of the a7s iii manual shows that an AF-S mode is available?

  • @paulengle5784
    @paulengle5784 25 днів тому

    Lawd, that image looks amazing.

  • @mirrorlessny
    @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

    Good 4K comparisons with R5 & S1H 2:43 , also thanks for HD quality samples 6:18 . Looks like A7SIII makes a smart compromise by bringing reliable recording, higher fps & better low light quality while sacrificing oversampling sharpness which is visible when cropping 2:43 (you can see it if you watch this video in 4K on larger displays like pc monitors/laptops/tv)

    • @carlkim2577
      @carlkim2577 3 роки тому +1

      As someone else commented, that's only for 24 fps. At higher frame rates, the other cameras are softer than the Sony due to line skipping.

    • @FantabMedia
      @FantabMedia 3 роки тому

      @@carlkim2577 The S1H doesn't use line skipping, it uses a 1:1 pixel readout for 4k/60 and quality is about the same as the SIII in those modes. Agreed on the R5 though; it's high-speed 4k is definitely worse than Sony's.

    • @carlkim2577
      @carlkim2577 3 роки тому

      @@FantabMedia but what about 4k 120? Or 180?

    • @FantabMedia
      @FantabMedia 3 роки тому +1

      @@carlkim2577 Doesn't do 4k 120 mate. 180 is line skipped but it is (and 240) on the SIII too. I think the SIII 240 will be better quality than the 180 of the S1H although it's not that bad if you have loads of light. I'm still interested in an SIII, it's got so many features.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      @Kris Smith thx guys for S1H/R5 24fps clarification & S1H info apsc4k60 crop/180hd line skipping, you are right a7siii is line skipping at 240fps thankfully 4k120 quality is superb & looks like 4k60/120hd is full sensor readout 👍 it's awesome how a7siii is stuffed with so many important & useful features

  • @AdrianVenturaMusic
    @AdrianVenturaMusic 3 роки тому

    For run and gun videography, I’d argue a video camera like the xf705 or Sony/Pana versions would be the best video cameras out there 😉

  • @daveyking
    @daveyking 3 роки тому

    Did you say raw with full adjustability is coming with a firmware update on the Atomos?

  • @PowerControl
    @PowerControl 3 роки тому

    I prefer the hair flying in the wind, Jordan. Doesn't look like brick hair.

  • @jodokcello
    @jodokcello 3 роки тому

    witch lens do you recommend for this camera?

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому

      400mm 2.8

    • @danieldougan269
      @danieldougan269 3 роки тому

      For what use? This is a video-centric camera, and video tends to be shot at wide angles. The Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 is a great all-around choice for photo and video, and it's not crazy expensive. The Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 is a bit cheaper, but I think you will want that extra bit on the wide end if you're shooting a lot of video.
      Sony makes a really nice 28-135mm Power Zoom f4 broadcast-type lens if you're into manual focus and/or a servo for smooth, motorized zooming in video, but that lens can get pretty expensive. If you don't know why you need that lens, it's probably not for you. If you're into fast prime lenses, the Sony 24mm f1.4 is a solid choice as well to pair with the a7S III, and it could make up for the shortcomings of the 28-135mm f4 PZ or the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 on the wide end.
      The a7S III is not a camera I would want for sports and wildlife. It's a low-light video and nighttime street photography camera. The low-resolution sensor doesn't give much latitude for cropping if you don't have a long, enormous telephoto lens. You want the a1, a7 III, or a9 II for that. Even the a7R III and IV are better choices for that because you can crop in so much, although those might make more sense for landscape and portrait photographers. So I wouldn't look much into the telephoto range for the a7S III.
      I disagree with Jon about the 400mm f2.8 being a good pairing for this camera, but perhaps he was kidding. The a7S III is a niche camera primarily aimed at videographers.

  • @chrisvassiliou889
    @chrisvassiliou889 7 місяців тому

    shooting stills the numbers of shots can be determined thus evaluating how much the camera was used, but can video usage can be found when buying second hand?

  • @Weird_Quests
    @Weird_Quests 3 роки тому

    Now just need to find a reason to upgrade from a7 iii and the Tamron 28-75 :)

  • @TechTagged
    @TechTagged 3 роки тому

    What lens was used in this clip?

  • @seanimal3
    @seanimal3 3 роки тому +2

    Yall should have a million subscribers! Best reviewers in the game period

  • @lotharjoseph5040
    @lotharjoseph5040 3 роки тому

    Which lens you guys used to shot this episode??

  • @jasonnowwhat5041
    @jasonnowwhat5041 3 роки тому

    Not sure where you heard the rolling shutter information but it’s been reported everywhere, including by Sony, that the a7siii rolling shutter performance is 3x better than previous generation cameras.

  • @MarlonOrellana
    @MarlonOrellana 3 роки тому +2

    Hey just to double check which codec is the best? The hs or the si?

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      S-I is best quality but takes most space & requires CFexpress cards for 4k120

  • @jimbean532
    @jimbean532 3 роки тому +1

    Good review...except for the low light test. For that, please check out Camera Conspiracies’ dark bathroom test, because, Science! 😉

  • @OrigEntertainmentOfficial
    @OrigEntertainmentOfficial 3 роки тому

    More videos with Jordan please.

  • @mkmkmk845
    @mkmkmk845 3 роки тому +2

    please do full review of fujifilm x-s10

    • @ChristianThueringer
      @ChristianThueringer 3 роки тому +1

      I want that too, still struggling between xh1 and xs10. I want a second camera to my xt3 with ibis.

    • @jamesshort6856
      @jamesshort6856 3 роки тому +1

      @@ChristianThueringer maybe wait for the xh2

  • @jonathansecret6054
    @jonathansecret6054 3 роки тому +1

    at 7:50 what lens did you use ?

  • @roscosart1888
    @roscosart1888 3 роки тому +3

    No review on IBIS ?

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      hah I didn't even realize it was missed 😣 Active IBIS definitely improves Sony's aging stabilization

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 роки тому

      @Kalifay G yea standard IBIS is so so, I did a test with active IBIS & it definitely improves stabilization but not amazing

  • @nakedcellist
    @nakedcellist 3 роки тому

    Soooo.. which hair gel does Chris use? Asking for a friend..

  • @jimgd4
    @jimgd4 10 місяців тому

    Did they add the Tally Lamp to the production model?

  • @RicoResolves
    @RicoResolves 3 роки тому +5

    In my honest opinion, this is not the best run and gun camera available today. The best run and gun camera available today differs for everybody. Mostly due to budget and usage. Someone who sits in front of his camera all the time, has different needs than someone behind the camera. Someone who's looking for a good hybrid camera needs a different camera than someone who only shoots video. The video capabilities of the Sony A7Siii are great, there's no denying that but the photo capabilities are underwhelmed due to its 12mp camera. The Fujifilm X-T4 is claimed to be one of the best hybrid cameras but it's not a full frame camera (some find that important) and overheats when shooting 4k/60fps (and with 4k/24p it'll turn off eventually ;-)). The Panasonic GH5 has awesome color science and stabilisation, but absolutely sucks when it comes to autofocus (trust me I know, I own one and want to throw it to a wall sometimes).
    TLDR: Find your budget, determine your needs, compare and decide for YOUR NEEDS.

    • @jamesshort6856
      @jamesshort6856 3 роки тому +2

      Hopefully the fuji xh2 comes soon. Its gonna be a beast!

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +2

      I just need a lovechild between Panasonic and Sony. Gimme that delicious 24mp sensor with dual native ISO, 10fps burst, waveforms, vectorscopes, hybrid AF...
      Panny boy has got so many nice features and I'm keen on the S1/S5, but I'm waiting to see what Sony gives us in the A7iv before deciding which system to invest for full frame.
      Though if the S1/S5 can't focus on black cats or a white flower cos of the lack of contrast, I'll throw it at a wall too.
      Fuji's way too expensive, I could build a similar kit of same focal lengths for the same price with A7iii.
      I think I'll prolly pick up a G9 soon. 10 bit, IBIS, excellent burst speeds, no overheating, able to come in with me to the shower... has nearly everything I need.

    • @RicoResolves
      @RicoResolves 3 роки тому +1

      @@professionalpotato4764 If you feel that AF is important, then forget about Panasonic completely. Saw a great example of the Panasonic S5 footage from Sara Dietschy. Not my favorite UA-camr but since she was using 3 cameras (Sony A7siii, Canon R5 and Panasonic S5) it was an excellent showcase on why not to buy the S5. The hunting was terrible, even worse than Panasonic. I'm so sick of my GH5 due to that, that I can hardly hold out till Black Friday before I buy something else. I'm seriously leaning towards the Sony A7iii and just putting my phone on top of it as a "monitor" lol or to buy the Sony A7C (even though it's far too expensive for what you get atm.)

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 роки тому +1

      @@RicoResolves True.. AF is important to me. At the same time, I kinda want a system that has robust weather sealing, and Panasonic seems to be one of the best. Fuji's not too bad too I think, but not sure if it'll survive shooting in the rain for an hour. Sony's performance is great, but I'm not sure I can trust its sealing.

    • @RicoResolves
      @RicoResolves 3 роки тому

      @@professionalpotato4764 well, if Sony claims its weather sealed and you take it out in the rain and it breaks, that would fall under warranty I guess.

  • @KoiAquaponics
    @KoiAquaponics 3 роки тому

    Is it possible to do a fast color grade of slog3 im davinci resolve?

    • @jamesshort6856
      @jamesshort6856 3 роки тому

      Of course. Just slap on the sony lut and do some base correction and your set

  • @oddsparrow8522
    @oddsparrow8522 3 роки тому

    did I hear heating problem - like to see the community jumping on that ;-)

  • @belaboured
    @belaboured 3 роки тому

    Love your reviews. I think they outshine just about everybody else. But bear in mind that English does that with the 'i' sound, uniquely among European languages. There's even a recognized English pronunciation of Latin, which features that sound prominently. Nothing to apologize for, it's been that way forever. Shakespeare would have pronounced it Neyekon not Neekon.

  • @ianrosie4431
    @ianrosie4431 3 роки тому

    Nah, if I had to choose, I'd say the best run and gun camera was the Supermarine Spitfire PR Mk VI. It carried one obliquely mounted Williamson F24 with a 14in focal length, which could face to the left or right, and two vertically mounted F24's, one 5 inch and one 14 inch. Note the F4 5". These guys were flying low and in easy reach of whatever could be thrown at them. So these stripped out speed machines were fitted with eight .303in Browning machine guns for a bit of punch. Something that makes you think a bit is one of the pre-requisites stipulated by RAF Reconnaissance for their flying tripods. The plane must be able to provide a stable platform even when shot full of holes.

  • @deepseadiver8191
    @deepseadiver8191 3 роки тому

    Nice review. However, I don’t think the comment about the EVF’s resolution is accurate. The quality / resolution of the EVF in live viewing is indeed inferior to that in playback but only in stills mode. In movie mode the resolution is identical in viewing and in playback. Perhaps you shoot video while being in stills mode or maybe it’s something that has changed with a firmware update since this review? I still find it annoying as I’d love to take advantage of this great EVF when takings stills too.

  • @orshanti
    @orshanti 3 роки тому +3

    looking forward to your review of the new nikons z mk 2! chears! and dont forget the gel! :)

  • @ekjellgren
    @ekjellgren 3 роки тому

    So whats the best FF body for stills and occasional video?

  • @pzark3638
    @pzark3638 3 роки тому +2

    no mention of dual native ISO??

  • @HorsesNBayonets
    @HorsesNBayonets 3 роки тому

    Long-time fan of TCS and Chris/Jordan, but I can't help but wonder if Jordan thinks of Sony like a son. His critiques are so merciful. The tone is just very different from when he reviews Canon cameras whether he realizes it or not. He reviews cameras for videographers way more than the causal hybrid shooter, which he has every right to do. I just can't stand the AWB and IBIS issues with my A73 and this camera seems like it's only marginally better for casual shooters.

    • @rsmith02
      @rsmith02 3 роки тому +1

      Maybe because these concerns are marginal and overall the camera is great? As a Sony user I don't use AWB for video (why would I?) and use a gimbal or shoulder rig in addition to IBIS.

  • @jeffluo9591
    @jeffluo9591 3 роки тому +6

    I'm guessing a 92% gold award for a7s3

  • @joelthomasjordan
    @joelthomasjordan 3 роки тому +1

    "Killer boots, man."

  • @LE672AJ
    @LE672AJ 3 роки тому +2

    We got a shot of Jordan in a fetal position again. The legend continues 😆

  • @finnillson4808
    @finnillson4808 3 роки тому +1

    I still prefer the R5 for the all around better rounded features. Sony really up their game with the S3.

    • @Davitor1
      @Davitor1 3 роки тому

      @Kalifay G 12 mp. for photography. LOL 😝 No thanks

    • @finnillson4808
      @finnillson4808 3 роки тому

      @Kalifay G a proper video camera would have internal NDs and better sound I/O. Like the C70, FX6, etc...The A7Siii is just like the R5 but with only 12MP.

  • @alihammad6318
    @alihammad6318 3 роки тому +1

    Softness wise, the A7siii is a lot softer than I expected for 4K. I have a theory and its to do with aggressive noise reduction taking out fine detail. Also a weird theory but I think Phase Detect AF points on sensors somehow reduce fine detail as well, but don't quote me on that.
    Look up the ZCam E2-M4 or the BMPCC4K. 10MP sensors shooting 4K but it has a lot more detail than the A7siii. Hell, I have an old Blackmagic Production 4K (super35 global shutter) that looks more detailed, even off youtube comparing downloaded footage. I think the heavy noise reduction is hurting there. Its hard to describe but the footage looks "paper thin" whereas the BMPCC4K/ZCam E2-M4 have a very detailed but organic and filmic look.

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому +1

      I have a theory too. It is not soft at all. Footage from a7s III is thicc. You don’t have a clue buddy.

    • @alihammad6318
      @alihammad6318 3 роки тому

      @@JonPais I'm not the only one who said this, there are others who concurred as well on the A7siii facebook group. If you read you'll see I wrote softer than expected for 4K. Why does something like the Sony FS7, another 4K camera, outressolve the A7siii in my experience? Probably due to the lack of exteme noise reduction.
      Sharpness and detail are 2 different things, the A7siii is sharp for sure but it's lacking a little bit of detail that I expected, which makes it not have its organic feel.

    • @JonPais
      @JonPais 3 роки тому

      @@alihammad6318 define organic. lol I avoid fb groups. image of a7s iii is beautiful.

    • @alihammad6318
      @alihammad6318 3 роки тому

      @@JonPais I've never denied that it's beautiful haha, it looks stunning. It's so hard to put your finger on, but its missing just the tiniest amount of "sauce" that would make it worlds more impressive.
      Take for example the Blackmagic Cinema Camera 2.5K. it's got a resolution of 2.5K but that resolves a shit ton of detail, and even without sharpening you can see that.

    • @alihammad6318
      @alihammad6318 3 роки тому

      @@JonPais definition of organic is having lots of detail without being oversharpened. A lot of mirrorless cameras have in-camera sharpening that cannot be turned off, and it make footage look like video more than film. Whereas it actually looks better without any extra sharpening and it's just pure detail from the sensor

  • @TL-vt8uk
    @TL-vt8uk 3 роки тому

    Fyi, you are already over 181,000 Subs.....Presume Jordan meant to say 281,000 ??

  • @m1kel
    @m1kel 3 роки тому

    at least its af is better than the S1H :)
    i can see, when one loves a system ... nothing else can change ones mind :)

  • @lexipau
    @lexipau 3 роки тому +1

    "Follow me Chris!" Lol.