Why do people use macOS?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- Why do people use macOS?
This review goes over all the Pros and Cons of macOS. I've used Windows and Linux extensively so lets dive into macOS. Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
00:59 The Good Things about Mac
01:21 macOS Terminal
02:01 Homebrew GIMP Install
02:29 macOS System Preferences
03:41 Mail Clients
04:02 DaVinci Resolve on macOS
05:35 The Bad Things about Mac
06:40 Gaming
07:17 64-bit Apps Only
08:17 Global Shortcuts
09:27 The Weird of macOS
10:06 macOS Extended Attributes
11:58 DaVinci Resolve Ryzentosh Issue
12:59 Conclusion .
►► Digital Downloads ➜ www.cttstore.com
►► Reddit ➜ / christitustech
►► Titus Tech Talk ➜ / titustechtalk
►► Twitch ➜ / christitustech - Наука та технологія
Fun fact: Microsoft Office was created for macOS before Windows even came out!
Oh wow! Didn't know that! Thank you for sharing!
Another fun fact: Microsoft Office does not support the .docx format. Instead, it puts a vague interpretation of it into the files with this extension. This is actually the cause of incompatibility with LibreOffice.
@@grc5618 Macintosh Office was not a suite of productivity software. It was an early attempt at office-space collaboration. It shared drive space and printers with multiple Macs on a LAN.
In Jan '85 MS released Word for the Macintosh OS. In Sept. '85 MS released Excel for the Mac. Apr '87 PowerPoint for Mac.
Excel for Windows was released Nov '87. All three apps were released for Mac before even one was released for Windows. They released Word (Jan '90) and PowerPoint (May '90) for Windows later than Excel.
Microsoft's Office suite, bundling the three apps together for the first time, was released for Mac Jun '89 and for Windows Oct '90. There was an Office suite on the Mac over a year before it released for Windows.
What is left out of that history is the reason productivity software was released on the Mac first and how Windows even came to be (or came to be as quickly after the release of the Macintosh OS, anyway). Apple asked Microsoft to develop productivity software for the Mac and gave them a working model prior to '84 official launch of the Mac. Microsoft copied the OS (which of course Apple did, too, after Apple's engineers and Jobs toured PARC Labs which had many people from Douglas Engelbart's computer research team that developed the original point-and-click user interface in the mid '60s) and MS tried to avoid copyright infringement by changing the Mac OS code and UX *just* enough (which is one reason some things in Windows are just a little more cumbersome than in the Macos ... and, over the years, vice versa). And how did Microsoft develop Excel and Word? They copied existing software and "improved it." Lotus 123 was the basis for Excel; so much so that even today you can still use functions from 123 in Excel. I do give it MS with Excel tho. They took a mostly-usable product and turned it into a power house, especially after the introduction of VBA in '93. VBA was my first successful use of an object oriented language and it taught me a lot. Becoming an Excel expert helped me understand concepts about data types, pipes, etc. before I even tried to be developer.
Actually Excel and Word were Mac only at first. . I had the first version of Excel on a floppy.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Excel#Early_history
@@grc5618 Ok, it wasn't really office, but it was by Microsoft and it was sort of a "prototype" for office
This guy is genuinely my fav linux youtuber, he can actually see the value of other OSes and unlike some other linux youtubers he doesnt insult or belittle users of other OSes.
Because he isnt a linux youtuber. He goes back and forth between all 3. Other people are on Linux for a certain reason or philosophy
Typical Linux user mindset.
Sees a guy who uses Windows, Mac, and Linux.
Creates mods and scripts for all three and has various different projects on the go at once, and the Linux zealot thinks he's looking at a Linux UA-camr.
Hey, Linus Tech Tips did a review of the M1 Mac recently, guess he's a Mac UA-camr now, eh?
Yeah hardcore Linux users have that weird sense of superiority when they shouldn't. Linux has its downsides just like the other two mainstream OS's. (Im a new linux user myself and Ive noticed this just in my short time using it)
@@Phoenixwizard77 Your lack of understanding of the system doesnt indicate Linux has issues. It's likely just you.Linux doesnt hold your hand like you are accustomed to. It takes a long period of time and experience of the things not understood by a new user.
@@Phoenixwizard77 I think the first reply to your comment shows you're 100% correct.
"It's not Linux, it's you!"
If the best defence of Linux is 'it takes a long time and a ton of experience to get things to work worse than on Windows or MacOS", that's the definition of "worse"'!
The "desktop environment" of macOS is basically a rich mans gnome.
Not really. Plasma can look *_exactly_* like MacOS within about 30 seconds. Move your default panel to the top, and remove the Task Manager widget, and in its place, add the Global Menu widget. Add the User Switcher widget to the far right of the panel. Right-click the Kicker menu, and choose the Application Dashboard alternative. Create a panel for the bottom of the screen, adjust the height to make it a bit thicker, and add the Icon-Only Task Manager widget and the Trash widget. Done, unless you care about the wallpaper and/or icons, which would literally only take another 30 seconds. Gnome, although I really don't care for it, is honestly very unique.
Or XFCE
@@bradleypariah I think 30 seconds is an exaggeration, but yes, it's easily doable and pretty fast to do
@@bradleypariah When I started college back in '06, MacOS was fairly popular among my peers, so I definitely did set up KDE to mimic a MacOS look from time to time - which was fairly easy even then. While I felt a bit left out at the time, at the end of the day my desire for that shiny UI has long since vanished (mostly), and I have much more fun customizing my more minimalist UIs.
more like Deepin now imo
Reasons for me using MacOS:
1. Working professionally as a Windows tech for 20 years takes a toll on your sanity.
2. I can focus on using really well developed apps, even if proprietary and non-free, and just let the OS stay out of the way, like an OS should do.
3. Appreciation of an OS developed by a company, with paid professional programmers hired to fulfill one vision, the commercial Apple vision of fully integrating apps, OS and devices into the "walled garden". It may be constrained, but the foundation is very solid.
4. The robustness and "it just works", no drivers, no registry, no .Net Framework, VC++ components, none of that bloat.
5. The ability to run MacOS, using the OpenCore rootkit, on a PC i built myself, with the components I choose. If nothing else as a proof of concept. It's a cool experience!
6. It’s beautiful.
7. It’s buttery smooth.
8. I’ve never experienced any kind of bug.
9. It works well with everyone else’s computer in my office.
10. With trackpad gestures you can rapidly flip through your tasks like a Las Vegas card dealer.
11. You can still do typical Linux stuff in the terminal.
I’m a Linux admin. Linux is a freaking amazing server platform, I just don’t care for Linux desktop. macOS imho is a good balance between a usable desktop UI and having a real *nix locally to be able to do *nix things like a shell, sed, grep etc.
BorisaRed Im not having any bugs or crashes on Catalina whatsoever. Maybe don’t generalize
@@thisismyalias Yeah.. my Macbook Pro has been rendered unbootable twice by updates and because "Macs just work" nobody seems to know how to recover from that.. had to reinstall OS both times.
I agree with the first 4 things 100%
This is the most bizarre macOS review I've ever seen, that's coming from somebody who's used all three OSes for a really long time. You didn't show off hardly any of macOS's unique features, and you focused on things that 99.9999% of Mac users would never even know or care about. This is an interesting perspective from a hardcore Linux user, but wow.
fakecubed This is the video I was searching for. So much more useful than those floritures mac users usually advertise
That’s because this guy is a Linux fanatic. They need to push this shit for people and they are trying to do that for more than 20 years or so. They are not being very well succeed tough because people doesn’t like the headache of deal with Linux desktop and prompt odd commands
@@josecarlosxyz It shows you don't know much about Linux, pretty much all Linux package managers are superior to brew on MacOs.
Tim LOL, Mac users don’t need to know or care about package managers.
Joseph Barros I agree this is a terrible approach to winning over Mac users (or probably Windows users) to Linux. I use Linux now for most of my main computer tasks and I’ve converted a bunch of my Mac friends. The absolute last thing I’d ever talk about to get them interested in Linux is package managers or even keyboard shortcuts. I tell them Linux has become great for gaming and there’s a ton of free software and they can use whatever hardware they like instead of being stuck with whatever Apple wants them to use. I tell them set-up is a breeze and managing the OS isn’t the stuff of nightmares anymore, with an easy distro. I ask them what software they’re currently using and then let them know it works on Linux or there’s a completely free alternative that these days has all the same features and (mostly) the same level of polish as they’re used to. These people I talk to are receptive, they dual-boot for a while, and they start learning more advanced stuff on their own if they really want to. They end up convincing themselves to switch on their own.
Great video. I was a Senior Tech Advisor for 8.5 years till June 2019 until we lost our Apple contract. We never got to use the terminal or show the customers, it was all about showing them how to fix it themselves if it was a software issue. I am a LM19 user for several months now and was Win XP and 7 till both lost support. I realized the MAIN reason why people like Apple in general, is there synchronization between their devices and accounts, especially for parents to their children. That was it mainly, iPhone, iPod, iPad, WatchOS and Mac OS X and just MacOS, all had this sync that just technically worked. Crappy thing was when devices couldn't update any more, you technically had to upgrade, so they did a lot of buy back and you still had to pay a pretty penny. As for the scripts, they were fun to make, but it was a pain the @$$ to show a customer.
most young developers on conferences bearing Macs don't have children, I guess :)
I’ve had a Mac for 25 years and a Linux machine for the last decade or so. The more time you spend in those two operating systems the more you realize what close cousins they are. Windows is the odd man out and, not being much of a gamer, I don’t know why I would want to use it.
I use a MacBook and a Linux desktop. I do, however, play games as well as use some Win/Mac only software so at this point I'm forced to have a Windows dual boot.
I'm currently getting into Python programming and as soon as you do anything with a terminal it's obviously nice that both OSes are Unix-based.
I really like Gnome since it feels familiar to a Mac user while not ripping it off. But I have heard that KDE Plasma can easily be customised to be more similar to macOS so I might experiment with that
What desktop environment and distribution do you use on Linux?
i worked with linus mac and windows and on all honestly after windows 10, windows is number 1 followed by linux then mac, windows is overall the best there is nothing you can't do on a windows machine it is a mature feature rich OS
Windows has a terrible command line system and messed up file hierachy. It also has bugs and features from several years ago for backwards compatibility (I guess that's good, but its to the extent that modem windows is slow and buggy too). That being said, if you want to game, use windows. Windows is also great for creating bodged, hacked together programs. This is all from my limited experience with windows tho.
Tom Varga. Also I really don’t understand how ‘administrator rights’ work. Most of the time it lets you do stuff and then suddenly it prevents you from doing normal things, like even deleting a folder that somehow got restricted.
@@JJSogaard I think that could be to do with the A B C drives? I'm not too sure
FYI, on Linux there also are extra attributes. It just isn't shown with the LS command. You might want to look into it for a future video.
LOL. Saved a young sysadmin from that once. He had no idea. Old grey beard sysadmin to the rescue. Ha.
Yea, sometimes you can confuse the more inecperienced Linux user by putting the immutable attribute on a file by
chattr +i /some/path/file
and they get really upset why they can't delete it even as root.
But it's a nice feature if you occasionally want to prevent files from being deleted or overwritten by some process that runs with elevated privileges that you cannot or don't want to dissect and reprogram.
@@othernicksweretaken Never heard of this before!
See, your issue was using Bedrock instead of Java edition kappa
Java FTW
Java FTW! My son has a switch and I use a custom DNS and bedrock server to get all of us in the same server. So that is why I was messing around with bedrock.
@@ChrisTitusTech makes sense. I have a friend with only the Switch version so I should look into getting Bedrock working on Linux...
@@ChrisTitusTech Makes sense
@@user-tm3fz7qx3s bedrock version work very very well on linux, seach "mcpelauncher linux" on Google
One of the things most people miss about apple is the amount of integration of services and apps across all their devices. I love Linux and its my main driver, but having the integration between Mac, iPad, iPhone is fantastic
Yep
As long as you stay in their ecosystem
it's convenient, but i just couldn't be using products all controlled by 1 company, id very rather use linux, and do everything by myself
macOS is a great operating system for both a user and a developer. All the apps (besides game) you'd want works, and because it's based off of BSD Unix, you find common functionality between Linux; and homebrew is magic. The major downside for me is its closed ecosystem. I want to be able to use whatever I want, not monopolize myself to one company.
I've seen X.org installed on a Mac running Mac OS X, so Linux applications would probably work, mostly.
I don't get it. There is no limit on what you can install on macos as long as the software has a version written for macos and dune cases Linux.
How about windows. Its has wsl also now working pretty fast and you will get best of both worlds. Mac sucks because apple develops it. Apple is gold digger.
@@sonulohani not fast at all. And only the latest beta of intelij idea seems to have supports for wsl2 thus it's an option for some frontend devs only
@@sonulohani wsl is a hack :p it essential windows virtualizing linux xD
I used to use OS X during the 10.4 to around 10.7 when the versions were still named after big cats. During the XP vs Vista/7 era it just worked. As a photographer having colour calibration built in was huge too. Also when Macs ran on PPC hardware it was also a hardware choice. The G5s were pretty cool back then. Anyway, I started playing around with the terminal, installing Mac Ports and doing more with my computer. Eventually when I got a PC when PPC support dropped I switched to FreeBSD, then Ubuntu, BSD again and back to linux. I like Elementary in alot of ways because it reminds me of what OS X used to be and what some of us thought it was going to be when Steve Jobs was talking about OS X and open source.
macOS has the best audio system, much much better than Windows’ ASIO or Linux’s PulseAudio & JACK. Super low latency and requires no setup whatsoever! Great for musicians.
But for everyday task other than music production, Linux is pretty awesome!
Tried them both and its very very close. Mostly it just works in both equally goodcfor most modern interfaces for audio
How does the audio system compare to FreeBSD? I don't edit sound and with *BSD being a thing I don't see the need for macOS
For pro audio/multitrack audio Mac is awesome. It just works, and is consistently reliable. ASIO drivers for windows are sketchy at best and a nightmare at worst.
@@Traumatree Been muti tracking for years on Ubuntu Studio and Harrison Mixbus! and the problem is?
没想到在这里看到好和弦，我可是你的忠实观众。
I like the honest comparisons here. Subbed.
As someone who uses it for music and photography -
1 It works seamlessly with any hardware I attach to it
2 It has a nice, clean and professional feeling interface
3 It works with my network NAS drive so much better than my Windows machine
4 in 9 years it's never crashed
5 No forced updates
6 No slow down over time with a bloated registry
7 It has all the software I want
8 And for someone who is now at the stage where they can't be bothered messing around with the system, it just works
The "natural" scrolling option is a must for Trackpad usage, but I don't like it for a standard mouse-wheel. I really wish there was a way to switch it easier or set it for individual devices.
Yes! using trackpad and a scroll-wheel mouse or switching between a magic mouse and traditional mouse is so annoying since you can't set for individual devices
If only I could develop ios apps from non mac natively, there would be no need for mac in my life...sigh...
100%.
You hate using a good system? Sad!
I'm beginning to wonder why people still use Windows?
For me, I don't like linux on my laptop. I can't tweak the driver. So many things not right.
AC3 Filter. All of my downloaded movies would output to Dolby Digital or DTS in Windows. DTS works, but most other codecs don't.
I just gave up Linux mint yesterday now feeling home again on Windows.
I think @Motoryzen nailed it. Gaming mainly. Adobe users I think are better off on Mac.
The boss.
Can you do a review of the $1000 monitor stand? :)
I used MacOS as my daily driver from 2002-2021, and I finally switched to Linux a few months ago. There was a lot to love and a lot to hate about MacOS that I could go into. But instead, I'm going to mention the reason why a friend of mine uses MacOS, and can't really use anything else. She is visually impaired, and needs to use screen magnification (and "invert colors") in order to be able to read what's on the screen. She says that accessibility on MacOS is far better than accessibility on Windows or Linux. Although all the operating systems have accessibility features, the MacOS implementation is far more usable for someone who has to use it every day to get work done. She says "Microsoft hates their disabled users." Screen magnification on Linux is extremely clunky, and the Mac implementation is light years ahead of it. (This will vary depending on the desktop environment, but I'm not aware of any desktop environment that has screen magnification that's as usable as MacOS.)
I wrote a Literature Survey on this topic for my IT grad program. Visually impaired users who use Windowed tend to use third party tools over the built-in features. More and more visually impaired users are switching to Macs. When it comes to Linux, you have to look at speciality distros. Vinux is a dedicated distro with visual accessibility as a priority. It's based on Ubuntu, so it'll have some of the best app compatibility.
Have you got a linux laptop or a desktop? I am trying to get a linux laptop but can't find one? Would Mac work for same command lines as linux please?
Could your problems with the App Store be related to it being a Hackintosh? I have used the App Store for like forever and never ran into an issue installing stuff. Truth be told, I'm still on Mojave... maybe Catalina will ruin my experience, but so far it's been flawless :D
Hate the Mac App Store it's just about as bad as he makes it out to be, on the other hand it's way better than Microsoft's sad excuse for an app store. After getting use to Linux package managers, I find both very frustrating, adding to that, some of those package managers have become very slick over the last decade.
@5:47 agreed. AppStore is going to shift tremendously in quality once iOS apps show up in Big Sur. without touchscreen, it will be interesting to see how practical these apps will be to use.
Have they showed up in Big Sur yet? I'm running Monterey and they haven't shown up in my App Store yet. :(
hi, i'm from the future - quality hasn't changed or decreased at all
thanks for your honesty Chris, its the only reason I watch you . . also the interesting content you provide, thank you for your diligence.
Hey Chris.
I still wonder whether this opencore give more battery life to the laptop or not
Apple's ecosystem is impressive, I'll give them that. My issue is how locked down their hardware and software is. I've used multiple versions of Windows, different Linux distros (Arch on my desktop and Fedora on my laptop), and MAC OSX Snow Leopard years ago. When I used a Mac, it was fine, but I wasn't terribly impressed. There were certain programs I liked that weren't available on Mac (like foobar2000) that I couldn't find a good replacement for. Once I switched from iPhone to Android, that pushed me away from Apple more. Mac isn't very good for people who like to tinker with their operating system.
EDIT:
I'd recommend going with Pop OS! or Linux Mint to people who may be attracted to the interface of MAC OS and its ease of use. The Gnome desktop environment on Pop OS! is very similar to the desktop on MAC OS. Linux Mint is more similar to Windows and it's also easy to use and usually doesn't require additional configuration to make it functional (you can still do it if you want to add functionality or customize).
I tinker with my Mac plenty, just as I tinker with my GNU/Linux systems and servers. You just have to read documentation and keep an eye out for good software like you would with any system.
My problem with Mac OS X is that you're not allowed to legally run it on any PC. My problem with *Apple* is everything they sell is overpriced massively. You could probably build your own iPhone from the exact same parts yourself for half the cost.
What? If you want similar experience to mac you would go with Solus (the budgie desktop) or with Deepin (since Mac OS Big Sur is copying Deepin beta 20)
lmao I used foobar2000 when I was in the navy was my main music player.
Since Davinci resolve runs on linux too, a video on how different it runs on the respective operating systems would something nice.
The only main thing I noticed is on the free version, encoding options are basically stripped compared to macOS and Windows. You have to pay for Studio if you want h264, which to me is ridiculous. I'd much rather make a macOS VFIO/KVM just to run Davinci on for that reason.
@@tyisafk you dont have to pay for H264 in mac or windows, not tested linux.
@@tyisafk If you're gong to do professional video on a Mac, especially an M1 Mac, you really want to use Final Cut Pro.
Enjoyed the Mac info. Thanks.
OSX Snow Leopard was the bomb. It combined Apple's ease of use/works out of the box approach with many power user features. Since then they only added their subscription stuff, fenced off the ecosystem, and cut out all power user things. Catalina broke the last straw for me, am on Ubuntu now and it's brought back power user fun.
I agree. Snow Leopard was Apple's Abbey Road much like Windows 2000 with Microsoft. They've been spinning their tires ever since.
I agree, as well. I used MacOS from 2002-2021, and I loved it for a while, but I don't like the direction Apple is heading in, so I switched to Ubuntu a few months ago.
I used Snow Leopard from 2009 when I got my first mac, to around 2018 when I had to update for software compatibility reasons. Yeah, it was good. Now I use Debian, and I set up KDE to look a little like OSX, with the bar on the top.
Have you tried using Davinci Resolve on Linux and how does it compare? Snazzy Labs (mostly Apple focused channel) did a video on why their editor moved from Mac to Pop OS for video editing with Resolve.
So I wonder which one is better.
I've used Resolve on both Linux and Mac. The free version doesn't support H.264 import on Linux due to codec shenanigans, whereas it's fully supported on Mac and Windows (even in the free version).
@@WolfgangsChannel So there is a reason to use Resolve on Mac OS, interesting! I expected Linux experience to be better.
Also hi, cool to see you here.
That is amazing. For Linux you need nVidia as the AMD card support for DaVinci isn't there yet. However, I'm rocking a Vega64 and macOS with DaVinci works great. So it depends on your hardware.
I tried almost all relevant video editing apps on linux, and even I need to convert everything from mp4 to mov and from mp3 to wav in order to use davinici resolve - my opinion is that you cannot compare anything with resolve . Kdenlive and shotcut are like a kids toy vs davinci resolve....
@@SchoneMarisha Admittedly Kdenlive is a hell of a lot closer than shotcut or OpenShot, but yeah no argument here.
I think the position of the super key in mac is the best thing about it. So comfortable to use, right there under your thumb. Ctrl is something the rest of the world is used to, but if you regularly use both, it'd be really hard to honestly say that the pinky contortion is more comfortable. Not worth it to use a mac though, and neither is the excellent trackpad, but those two things stick out for me as commendable for sure, or even superlative.
RE: kdenlive taking a while to render: you can (and really should) setup multi-threading for your renders (check environment settings for MLT and under the render dialog select more options and bump the number of threads there too)
i use all 3 OS's daily, I love the setting up of a new MacOS to a new MacOS its so simple, (iphone to iphone even more so) downsides on MacOS i just can never remember the keyboard shortcut to start a filmshow of pics I have to google it each time!, Windows is my full time job and pays my bills thank god they keep coming up with untested updates like 2004, and for 10+ years Linux Mint has helps me as my main workshop machine in my business and is super reliable, great content Chris, subd
"can't remember the shortcuts". Lol, such a problem. If you are using this everyday and don't remember go see a doctor, Alzheimer is a thing this days.
That reversed mouse setting was a change to match their iOS devices. We old Mac users hates it..
For me, the scrolling especially when using a trackpad just makes sense. If you had a long piece of paper on the table, to see the stuff lower down you would place your finger on the paper and push it up, which is why I think Apple calls it Natural. With an external mouse it may seem counterintuitive though so on a Mac desktop I would probably use the Windows / Linux way, on a MacBook with trackpad I would use the Apple Natural way.
@@davidhughes9320 I think that is the difference. I see the mouse cursor going up the page. I see the trackpad as controlling the mouse, not the page.
I switched from MacOS to Linux a few months ago. I never looked back.
which distribution are you using? I'm VERY curious.
Ah THAT's why! Always good to get reasoned arguments from Linux Users.
I absolutely love what you do. I finally got the courage to start my own channel but I'm not that comfortable on camera yet😅😅I'd appreciate any tips if you see my comment🙂I'd also love to know How you put your time stamps so that they split in the video. Keep up the good work
Amazing Video Chris, reflects perfectly as a fellow Linux user coming from Windows.
A lot of the things you expect to work as an Unix system, but with that uneasiness if something won't work sometimes (especially those keybindings or any 'hidden' things your OS is doing it for you)
I have a Mac M1 for web development and I think it's the best machine for this task. Apart from being able to use tools that designers use, we have iOS emulators, Safari, Docker, Android Studio, Davinci Resolve also works amazingly on ARM based Macs. And yes we have a Unix environment with 2 package managers (brew and macports) with tons of open source software. I wouldn't be able to do all we can do on the mac with Linux or Windows. And the M1 ARM architecture is ultra fast and consumes much less battery. Totally agree on gaming and the Apple Store.
I've used the Mac and Windows over the years. The best thing about the Mac over Windows is it doesn't slow down over time. The worst thing about the Mac is being locked in with programs and music and being forced to upgrade your hardware to stay current. But there's nothing special about the Mac OS that makes me wish I was using it. I love Linux, and the Gnome DE is pretty damn awesome. I will never go back to using windows or mac .... and there actually is something special about Linux that makes me want to keep using it.
Windows 10 runs fine since it came out. The whole osx is optimized is bs.
Windows 10 on Mac hardware runs better than osx.
@@ashishpatel350 Just no dude. Windows 10 does not run better than OSX. Windows 10 cant run better than anything. MacOS is the best compromise after Linux.
@@cc4405 I've found debloated Windows to be more stable than Mac. I'm not sure what you're talking about.
Can you explain the machine you installed Mac on that rendered the video in 60sec please?
On the topic of shortcuts and automator, something I didn't see you talk about at all is Spotlight search. Command + Space opens Spotlight, which in my opinion, is the absolute best search you can get on a desktop OS. I very rarely feel the need for keybindings to open programs when I can get to it via Spotlight in seconds.
Great video, but your point about it being a hackintosh you can't really fault Apple for that, weather or not as Linux users we agree with Apple keeping MacOS hardware specific doesn't matter. Mac users won't ever have to mess with kexts, or bootloaders on Apple hardware.
The solution I have to gaming and 64 bit only on Catalina is I use Parallels Desktop. Which is a VM but it uses some local resources so gaming and 32 bit apps can run well in either Linux or Windows. I use macOS for Logic and Final Cut.
I need to check out Parallels again, it has been so long since I used it, but I remember it convergence mode was the best. You could run it without having a full desktop. Then again, that was the Win 7 days.
one thing i like about MacOS was their trackpad functionality, the switch between workspaces were seamless and scrolling a web page, word document, excel was easy. I too, use the brew commands a lot . first thing i installed was neofetch (first command i learn on Linux a few years ago) haha. I was using a macbook pro 2012 edition and i decided to test out linux on this macbook and the first thing i noticed was the fan was suddenly spinning loudly. I was initially surprised because during my usage on MacOS on that macbook, the fan hardly makes a sound. Of course, later on, i was reminded that MacOS does throttle their system to contain the fan's potential usage. I also hated their appstore, it felt ugly but nothing as bad as Microsoft store. I remembered when Catalina came out, i was like cool, i'll just update, nothing can be as bad as a windows 10 update....post update, some apps don't work anymore, it felt clunky to an extend (ironically, not as bad as Windows 10).
I honestly don't hate windows..ok i don't like 10 a lot. I love windows 7, it was working, i didn't care about any OS, and i maximize my time with music and video production and i came back to Windows 7 from 10 a few years ago because of a weird Wifi issue, where if it downloaded a big enough file, the driver will fail but on W7, i had no issues so instead of trying to figure out the reasons, i just switched. However, W7 was close to end of life so i went W10, the Wifi issue still existed so i would use my phone as an internet connection (plugged in via USB) but then the shit updates started pouring in. i think this was in 2018 when it started to make me hate it more and then i tried Linux . Out of the box, my wifi, was working. I love linux and i support its growth, but i do not like some of their err, passionate fanboys..i don't like fanboys, i like super fans, but not some religious police level of blind support.
Hence why i like Chris Titus, he doesn't seem to be a typical linux "arch user" and i do admit, the community of linux is way less toxic than it was (for me) in the early 2000s. Plus the growth of linux is good..it just needs some marketing exposure imo and there should be room for paid apps. I believe people should be paid for their good hard work. I just don't agree with greedy ones. eh, adobe. hehe.
wow 2 years since you started using Linux? Damn I didn't realize I followed you for that time already! Keep up the good work! I started usind Pop_OS last month and dualboot Windows just for gaming.
How quicky time passes! Thanks for all the support Alex!
Everyone: Siri
Chris: *Suri*
Having used Mac OS for 15+ years, I found switching to Linux, much much easier, than switching to Windows. A lot of the Unix conventions are very similar to Linux.
Judging by all the lit up apps in your dock, i think I need to give you a hint on how to exit a macOS program.
Pressing the red button on the top left of a window on Mac doesn’t quit out of the application instance. It only closes the window. You have to press cmd+Q or select the application menu in the menu bar for the active application and click on quit.
Which screen recorder are you using?
You can actually run davinci resolve on linux if you have an nvidia gpu
Resolve runs fine with my AMD RX580 on Linux.
Sir you missed the most important point for the developers....Mobile App developers specially need a mac to compile souce code for IOS apps....on windows or linux we are not able to compile apps for ios...So that we can't be able to build apps with the modern technologies like flutter,ionic,react native,xamrin forms etc.
Good point for those mobile app devs out there. MacOS is pretty much needed.
@@ChrisTitusTech yes sir... that's why I was wondering around to find best guide to hackintosh my laptop so that I can get some benefits...
@@muhammadusmankhan6761 You should be able to do that at least for a few years, till apple phases out intel and the x86 architecture in general completely from support.
Just search forums for hackintoshing (not linking directly to anywhere you can do such)
Disclaimer: It's against apple's EULA to put macOS on something that's not a mac that apple supports w/ the version you are trying to use (yes, that also means installing a newer macOS than what is officially supported by apple also would be against their EULA) [also it might be technically illegal depending on where you are]
That's just apple beeing a shitty company.
You wrong bro, you can keep compile android and ios on non mac device, if you react native developer you still can use expo. But still if you have paid apple developer id. It's not lack of compatibility but only if you have 99 USD money or not.
I agree with you about the App store on Mac. I can't get older OS from them to update my 2012 MacBook Pro. I was wondering if I could convert that Mac book to a Linux program.
I think there are just 3 groups of people that use macOS.
1-Apple lovers
2- macOS or iOS developers
3- music productors.
I use Debian on my desktop and a Mac laptop. I like both. MacOS is a good UNIX-like alternative to GNU/Linux all of it's issues/imperfections. That is not to say MacOS isn't flawed.
When I started using macOS, I realized that I don't need Linux anymore.
Yeah, Homebrew and iTerm 2 and you are on a real Unix BSD.
@@MichaelSharpTechniSmart Exactly. When I was on Linux, I thought that Terminator is the best, but now I see that iTerm2 has the same functionality + it is more stable.
Chris T, do you have a link to download the libiomp5 library?
Can you do a video on upgrading from LM 19.3 to 20? Best way?
My main grudge with windows back in the 2000's was how it hogged screen real estate. MacOS had this single place for everything without getting in the way. Currently running an ancient imac from 2011 (which is still working great :D) and a PC with windows/Kubuntu in dual boot. about to dive in to a KVM setup after a bit of research.
natural mouse setting is good with Magic mouse
Idea: make an Video about insralling Davinci Resolve on Arch with an Amdgpu, which has the open Source Drivers. Why? Because I Like to do editing with Resolve (not Kdenlive) in my Bedrock Linux Machine.
Everyone says you can't game on a Mac but I don't get it...why not? I mean, I'm not a massive gamer but I have plenty of games on here...The Sims 4, ARK, Subnautica, The Long Dark...are there big games that are missing on Mac? Or is it that the integrated graphics cards are not top of the range?
me i use linux and macOS i only actually use it for ios development
I do believe this is the only reason which may someone should buy a Apple product. Linux (and even Windows) do the better or equal things than MacOS (mostly about hardware)
@@gabrielporto5610 windows runs better on Mac hardware than osx.
@@ashishpatel350 just no😂
@@ashishpatel350 Linux too
IMO, PWA will change this.
The Windows-crew and the Linux-crew unite to explore the quirky depths of an unknown world.
Wrong. We linux homies are with macOS, not with windows cos its just not UNIX
There is no windows-crew! :P
9:15 Customizability is one of the things that I personally like about the Xfce desktop environment.
13:38 The thing that the entire base system, including the whole non-graphical part of userspace is the open source Darwin OS system I know, with it's many BSD based software parts.
It's just the large graphical software layer which makes mac Os what it is known for and wich is still very closed source.
I am really curious what you Chris Titus view of the real BSD systems would be. Which are really great open source systems.
Hey Chris! You should definitely check out KDE Connect. Its such a seamless experience once you connect your phone!
Just started using it on Manjaro, works very well and thought out. Noticed there is one for OSX and Win as well. Its a great companion to any OS, or seems so.
Bruh, Steam for Mac. Not all games for MacOS are in Apple Arcade.
Arcade hasn't even been around for very long and isn't how anyone game on Mac. He probably should have researched that part a bit more.
As a Linux person, macOS feels insultingly limited. Pretty much every time I want to configure something, I find out that it's either impossible or extremely cumbersome to configure it the way I want.
All of the package management options are half baked or only half-integrated, so managing software with them feels very clunky, and the results are messy and stateful.
Integration between the native components' command line functionality and GUI functionality is shockingly poor, considering that Apple controls the whole stack.
Window management and input handling are somehow even worse on macOS than on Wkndows. Blech.
Just a deeply frustrating experience overall.
Apple reminds me of Android somewhat:
Me: I'll just delete these Google Apps I never use. TapTap....WTF?
Android: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't allow you to do that.
Me: Screw you, Android. I'll go root! (Tries to use rooting tools, none work) WTF?
Android: Would you like to download more apps, Dave?
Me: Sure, Android...you do that....(starting to unscrew memory chips)
@@markh.6687 yep. Android is infuriatingly locked down and proprietary
I switched from MacOS to Ubuntu this year, and I actually found Gnome 3 to be even less configurable than MacOS.
I found the MacOS integration between the command line and the GUI to be fairly good. Using the "open" command, you can open a file from the command line in the GUI application it is associated with. And if you drag files from the Finder onto the Terminal, they turn into the absolute pathname of the file. Both of these features are insanely useful, and I used them all the time.
Mac is more for people who want to use the computer as a tool and the OS be out of the way and never have to think about it (just works). Linux is more for the person who likes to spend most of their time tinkering with the computer itself. For a former computer shop owner like myself it doesn't get better than MacOS. I also have two macs that run Linux in my home.
i have a macbook pro and the worst part for me is connecting to an external monitor will not give you as good image than any windows or linux laptop. i don´t know if this has to do with the os having limits on what resolutions it runs, driver or scaling issues. only certain certified monitors will give you a sharp image on mac, while on windows any laptop will look better than my mac connected to any monitor i´ve tried.
you can't change the refresh rate properly too for example if you want 24p
Do you have a link to that file for DaVinci Resolve?
The @ symbols mean that file uses an extended ACL (access control list), This also exists on Linux, shouldn't be new... The other thing is not related to this, the System Protection ensures that apps and other stuff just doesn't mess with your drivers, etc. That's what that Quarantine thing is also about. You can turn that off booting into the recovery partition, but I wouldn't recommend that, seriously. Installing kexts is also simple from the recovery partition. Inside the runng OS, it won't let you just do that... I hope this makes sense.
I love my Windows computer. I can edit videos on it, I can edit audio on it, I can modify pictures with it. There's an abundance of software available. I can buy any hardware for it and know that it will work. I haven't gotten a blue screen of death since before Windows 7. For the price of a Macintosh, I can have a killer Windows computer. And finally, "my Windows 10 computer just works."
Before Windows 10 I would have said the same. But now I'd rather take a Mac over Windows 10's garbage unless you are a PC gamer. Most creative software is as good or better than Windows on the Mac without them spying on you or updating in the middle of your work.
@@bored78612 Windows 10's garbage! That's the point. Nothing else to say.
I'm not sure what your talking about when you say Windows interrupts your work with updates. I've never had that happen.
With regards to Apple not spying on you, are you sure? You may want to look into that.
Also, what exactly is "garbage software"? If the software does what I need it to do, whether free, or for a price, and does so easily and efficiently, like Google Chrome, how is it garbage?
Since it will probably come up next; yes, Windows has more virus threats due to its large install base. However, in my many years of using Windows, I have yet to download a virus.
And I'll end by saying "Windows just works".
@@prima6170 Apple does not sell user data while Microsoft does. Apple charges (and overcharges for its services) but does not sell user data. Ask Microsoft if Windows 10 pro is HIPPA compalint they will stay quiet and point to the enterprise version whereas Apple says OS X is HIPPA compliant. You can completely disable the telemetry in MacOS but can't do in Windows 10. Using Windows is like paying someone to spy on you lmao. Yes I have checked this. Windows has become trash since Staya Nadella became CEO. By garbage software I mean Windows itself.
I do agree that viruses on Windows is mostly user error since Vista. UAC system has stopped a lot of easy hacks you could do in XP and 98 and stuff.
If Windows just works, Macs work wayy better as you don't have to deal with untested driver updates and botched patches by Microsoft's untalented developer team while also having way better battery efficiency and better hardware. If you have money, there is no reason to use Windows for your personal machine unless you are a PC gamer. And if you don't have too many proprietary software that you need to run then Linux is a great choice as well on PC hardware. I myself have switched to Linux for most of my stuff. And may get a ARM Mac laptop if they release it next year.
@@bored78612
bgr.com/2017/06/06/apple-spying-on-iphone-users
I'm glad you're happy with your Apple products. I'm also sorry you've had such bad luck with Windows that you found a switch was necessary.
I think the botched updates you are referring to happened a while back. I Haven't had any problems in recent memory.
For my part, I find my Windows computer serves me quite well. I can do all the things I've already mentioned quite effectively and efficiently. I like the vast selection of software and the scalability it affords me.
Enjoy your Apple products. Best of luck to you, and happy computing. 😉 👍
You didn't need todo brew tap homebrew/cask as cask is included by default.
It is a simple
brew cask install gimp
then to update
brew cask upgrade
I used a Mac from the mid 80s up until the late 90s... at the same time I was running Slackware (starting in 93) on my primary and Solaris on my Ultra 10. Over the years Linux has become quite stable and very usable even for a beginner. That being said I picked up an M1 Mac last year and it's everything I always wanted in an OS. The stability is phenomenal, I have the ease of use of the App Store when I need it (I know you didn't like it), standard apps for Office work (if needed) but also the ability to use all almost all my favorite UNIX / Linux programs and utilities as well as scripting. The only thing I can't do to my hearts desire is game... If they could get that worked out I personally wouldn't run anything else. (I currently have Kali and Caldera installed via WSL2 on my gaming PC)
The desktop trackpad really makes the Mac experience for me! It kills me that scroll direction natural setting applies to both mouse and trackpad- you can't differentiate. I'd like "natural" for the track pad, but Not with the mouse. Too much to ask apparently.
Currently I can 4 finger swipe between remote and vm desktops with my Mac seamlessly. This is top 5 coolest things imo.
Mechanical Vegan there’s an app for that, you know. use google.
@@PlamenTsilkov so if I should have used google, and you know something here, why haven't you just shared it?
@@vgnfab Cause I did it a long time ago and don't remember the name and/or url of every app I use. Sorry.
Do you use the Magic Mouse? I find it works really intuitively when scrolling naturally on that device. The same can't be said though when I plug in the mouse I use for gaming which uses a scroll wheel. When I've finished gaming but continue to use it for browsing, I notice I would definitely prefer the windows conventional scroll direction. So it depends on which mouse I'm using.
SteerMouse is $20 but adds a ton of mouse settings for each separate device
The #1 reason I've switched back to a Mac multiple times (and I still use my 2015 MBP 15" even though I just bought a brand new Zephyrus G14 in April) is the hardware support and performance for creative applications. For audio especially, nothing works as well on Windows or Linux as it does on a mac, or at least none of the audio hardware I've ever owned). Shit just works, no audio stuttering, roboting, driver installing issues, none of it. The kernel for Darwin just plain handles this kind of work better. I've done a lot of linux audio tuning to try to get low latency audio going on creative focused distros and it ends up being tons of work for less than stellar results. The experience I've had since switching back to Windows full time for the first time in close to a decade has just been awful. Driver installation issues, poor audio quality when using my nice hardware for video meetings, just a rediculous let down. Mac is just the simplest platform for any kind of creative production, its decent for my day job (web development), and good at sitting around consuming content too. The only real reason I don't use it daily any more is that performance for Docker based development is attrocious and the hardware is expensive (and while I've built a Hackintosh, its just a lot of work to maintain). Just my two cents as a user of Linux, Mac, and Windows.
As a musician who currently does not have a Mac, I miss macOS every day. Hoping to be able to get a Mac in the next few months, but at least for now I don't have to use Windows
The performance should be equal unless you are doing something wrong.
The hardware inside a Mac and a PC is the same depending on how much you are willing to spend on the Mac or PC.
If you have a Skylake i5 mac with 2400Mhz RAM and an Icelake i9 with 4000Mhz RAM PC, you're PC is going to outperform the Mac.
And the statement "the kernel for Darwin just plain handles this stuff better." What exactly do you think the MacOS kernel is doing with regard to your software's performance?
The only difference the kernel makes is that any hardware will be better suited to 'plug and play' on the Mac. But as both machines are Intel and will probably be running the same software, driver support vs a plug and play kernel will have a miniscule effect on overall performance.
It seems your mistaking familiarity and your inability to do some basic installing as a problem with the software you're running.
@@MaffeyZilog scheduling audio ahead of other tasks. I encourage you to research how different kernels handle audio scheduling. It makes a significant difference in audio workflows. How you code your kernel optimizes for different workflows, there is a lot of info about this on the web in regards to Linux and the rt kernel mod for the curious
@@thatdustinleblanc I'll be honest and admit I don't know enough about audio processing in general to debate the point with you so I'll have to take your word for it.
It certainly seems more complicated on the low level than what I initially assumed.
Apologies if my initial tone was a little abrasive.
Hi Chris, could you do another video on Asahi Linux? Arch Linux in the new macbook with Apple Silicon.
Quick tip, it's better to use the natural scrolling because it's actually the right way to scroll. One pushes the content in the direction they want the content to move, just like on a phone and tablet.
6:40 You could use geforce now for cloud gaming. I mean yes it doesn't have the privacy and stuff but you could play a lot of games for free.
Also another weird thing (9:27) that I felt was cut paste. There is no cut, you cannot do cmd+x you need to copy it and while pasting you should do cmd+alt+v which moves it
Yeah that bugged me so much lol.
A feature I use about never anyway.
For the gaming EXPERIENCE
What gaming experience?
@@fourseven9121 being hypocritic, gaming in linux is better than mac
Edit: i think i can misunderstand someone, so what i said was he is being hypocritical about mac's having any gaming capabilities or having suport, and linux have a much abroad community working on it and linux have better hardware price,because,well, apple.
@@firstbits650 steam stats for 2019 show 5% mac 1%linux 94%win... you linux users need to stick out of the sand when talking about gaming shares
@@And_Rec You can't really trust those numbers because you have to opt in to that. Being that most Linux users don't want to opt into any sort of telemetry service for anyone, it makes sense to see it at 1%. That's sort of the funny thing when it comes to talking about market/gaming shares across the operating system spectrum.
@@And_Rec i dint said linux have bigger gaming share, i just said drivers and work on "gaming" tools are far better in linux, corectrl, driver support, wine and proton, *32-bit and 16-bit support for games*, and said that mac is not cappable for gaming at the same price point as u can buy a laptop that have good support for linux, you know, *a heatsink is really good to stop the CPU from overheating*
I use Mac as my main desktop but I also use Windows and Linux. Final Cut Pro runs incredibly well. I can edit 1080p on my 2012 MBP with no problems. I agree the App store is lame. Macs don't really have a standard way of removing an application. Seems like an easy thing to add. I like that you can easily turn on the built in VNC based screen sharing. Same goes for SSH and SMB. I also like how easy it is to encrypt your drive with FileVault. I would love for Mac and Windows to get a package manager on par with Linux distros.
In Settings > Keyboard > Special Keys (bottom right corner of the window) you can exchange the keys for CTRL and CMD switches so it feels more like windows.
An Apple a day keeps the doctor away! Dr. Linux
An apple a day makes seven apples a week.
Mint, Pop, Manjaro is the medicine.
And sometimes Parrot
@@buttholethebarbarian8248 But Dr. Linux uses Gentoo and Arch and Artix and to Dr. Linux distributions don't matter.
An apple a day makes you sick in every fucken way :)
(っ˘ڡ˘ς) 「An 🍎 a day is delicious」【yummy】
Thank you, Chris. I used Apple in the late 80s up until Win 95. Apple was the alternative to Big Metal. The Ridley Scott ad of the woman smashing Big Brother? That was my Mac. When NeXT came out it was just insanely expensive. These days I have no idea why Mac is so appealing.
I think (as a mac, windows and linux user (just setup linux on an XPS 6 months ago, just used it in a VM and one of my desktops before that)), mac is appealing because most of the time it just works (When it does not it can be a colossal shitshow tho). I will happily pay their bloated prices and not as good hardware for the amount of time I have saved using it (Time I can now spend responding to comments on YT). Also the quality of apps is better IMO. If it happens to fit your workflow it is a good piece of software, sadly it just runs on subpar hardware.
Emad Ahmed never having to fix anything, no driver issues etc. have not had any issues with drivers not working like I would on Linux machines of past and don’t have to spend time actually making development tolerable in windows.also most apps I use just seem to be better polished like the Omni productivity suite thing, taskpaper, karabiner, Alfred, bear notes, iterm etc. esp for paid apps. Things have changed a little over the past 2-3 years with electron etc making it hyper easy to develop for all platforms.
Emad Ahmed A Mac user is much more likely to pay you for an app so even if market share is low, you may end up making more money. Some people limit themselves to making Mac/iOS apps for that reason as far as I can tell and are more inclined to make em better (just my hypothesis).
the Mac, OS X is/was the next incarnation of NeXT. That was the point of using the X instead of saying Mac OS 10.
@Emad Ahmed Ok mate, I am going to be as polite as possible but I just lost my NAS to a crashed volume so I dont have much patience right now (I know this may not be the most courteous thing for me to respond but you you weren't courteous either). What I gave in the initial comment was a my subjective personal opinion about the hardware and my experience. Your comment was a question asking me to go into detail about it, and I explained my subjective stance based on my experience in detail. I really dont care how you judge my subjective opinion. I have 10+ computers (collected over the last decade), they use some have linux, some have windows, some are macs and I even have a chromebook, i really dont care. I just limit my primary dev machine to mac for now to save on time. I have been very unlucky with every windows laptop I have bought.
I have failed to find good alternatives for apps that I use and that is down to my workflow. I find apple hardware to be subpar because the keyboard sucks, because it is almost impossible to repair by design and because I find the overall package ugly all subjective stances.
I dont need someone to change my opinion and I am not trying to change someone else's. OP said "These days I have no idea why Mac is so appealing" and I merely tried to explain what I found appealing about macs.
I hate every OS to a certain degree because if you just look at them as tools and ignore the philosophy behind them all of them have trade-offs, mac simply had the best combination of positives and negatives to match my use-case.
Thanks for reading my wall of text. I would suggest in the future that you dont explain things to strangers on the internet as if schooling a kid about his/her remarks and instead add to the conversation and that way people might be inclined to talk in a better manner. OR dont, it is your call.
Regarding the global shortcuts, the way I do it is to launch spotlight with cmd+space and start to type the application name. Similar to ulauncher in linux. Not as fast as a shortcut but short enough.
Regarding shortcuts I think this is a paradigm shift that a lot of people have trouble with. In macOS you can setup hot keys for things, but I find that spotlight works better for me. I just press CMD - Spacebar and then I type a few characters and spotlight will usually show me the all I want. I like it over shortcuts because I just think of the app I want rather than trying to remember a hot key to launch an app.
Automation is great but it has to be scripted. AppleScript is simple though.
Oh my, finally the best notification of my day hahahaha
From a long time MAC user. It's great, but far too expensive. My last macbook cost 1200 and now it's redundant to any updates. My Current ThinkPad cost me 55. Runs great with Linux.
Please i have a question is mac os that comes with a MacBook is the same as hackintosh mac os, is there a difference between them?
Natural scroll is for using gestures to scroll (like on a trackpad, or Apple mouse that doesn't have a scroll wheel) -- it's so that scrolling is the same as it is on your phone or tablet. If you want to scroll up on your phone, you pull down, right? But yeah, it doesn't make much sense on a normal scroll wheel mouse.
Great video as always !! I have several suggestions/comments:
1. Use spotlight more (the cmd+space key combination) to launch apps. GNOME has very similar system, and to be honest, a bit better than spotlight, but spotlight is really good for launching apps. Second best place to launch apps are your Dock, any frequently used app MUST be placed on Dock (at least I do).
2. Keyboard: I suggest you switch your alt and windows keys around, macs has command key next to the spacebar key. It removes the ctrl finger syndrome.
3. Short cuts: get comfortable with these key combinations ( support.apple.com/en-us/HT201236 ):
- cmd+Tab (app switching, with ability to close an app WHILE in tab switcher mode - hold cmd, press tab to open the app switcher BUT keep holding cmd, highlight the app you want to close, tap the Q key to close),
- cmd+S (to save changes to a document), cmd+shift+S to save as dialog/sheet.
- cmd+F to find, then cmd+G to do find next, and cmd+shift+G to find previous, very comfortable to press, and quite logical IMHO compared to ctrl+F then F3.
- cmd+W (to close current window),
- cmd+Q (to quit apps), this is Far better than alt+F4 IMHO, in Windows, with apps running in taskbar, alt+F4 does not always quit a running app, very inconsistent.
- cmd+, (cmd + comma, to open the app's preferences). Windows has nothing in this manner, I don't know much about Linux's Desktop Environment.
These made me want to go back to macOS. macOS's super consistent key combination for doing mundane tasks are consistent across all apps. Want to close a tab in a web browser, cmd+W. Want to close an app, cmd+Q. Want to open preference/settings in an app, cmd+, . It's very consistent. In windows, some apps use ctrl+f4, some use other key combination. To close an app, usually you press alt+f4 UNLESS the app is running in the taskbar area, if so, you need to right click the app in the taskbar, then click exit. I will get this in the next point. It's weird in Windows/Linux land. I haven't been using Linux desktop since I moved to macOS. nowadays I use Windows because Apple made really horrible machines with horrible price/performance ratio.
4. Window management and menu bar, I prefer macOS's way of arranging apps/windows, Windows's/Linux's MDI interface changed when macOS risen in popularity. Back then, in Windows, there's one huge parent window that hosts smaller "document" windows. This is MDI style. This becomes a problem when you have 2 or more displays, and if ACCIDENTALLY closed the parent window, all of your child/document windows are also gone. Once I started using macOS as my main OS some 8 years ago, I like how it manage my applications. I remember the days where I have Steinberg NUENDO open, and it uses the whole screen when I maximize it, and it has many child windows in it, and I need to span it across two of my monitors with the help of Nvidia NVIEW, it was not pretty. Compared to macOS's document window system, it's a lot better, I can maximize any apps on any monitor, and I don't give a damn about it.
Now, about that top, permanently showing menu bar: if I'm active at Google Chrome, the top menu bar will show me Google Chrome's menus, the document windows of Chrome does not need to have a menu bar at all. If I click one of Logic Pro's document window, the menu bar will switch to Logic Pro's menu bar, if I click Photoshop's window, the menu bar will switch to Photoshop's menu, so on and so forth. This made menu bar consistent across all apps, and this is VERY IMPORTANT.
If I want to close everything but I want to leave Chrome running so when I need to open it for a quick browse, I don't need to wait for it to start up - and macOS's way to manage application/memory is smarter than Windows, for sure.This style, in time, is adopted by Windows, but their way of applying this is weird, Windows apps will use tiny icons running in taskbar area to manage "running in the background apps", which is REALLY weird once I grasped the idea. Just keep a "dock area" that shows all running apps, each app can have many "document" windows, closing "document" windows does not close the app, keep the app running so I won't need to wait for it to start up every time I need it, and have one menu bar at the top of the screen to reduce clutter of varying applications running. This way I don't need to have a "taskbar icon area" and have tiny apps running all over it, I can see clearly my menu bar of ANY ACTIVE application, no need to make a "modern" app that does not have a menu bar, we need menu bars, no need to innovate something that is clearly does not need innovation, for example, Firefox will show a normal menu bar if you tap the alt key.
There are many more that made macOS easier for me to use compared to Windows/Linux, but for now, these are the ones that I think are related to your video topic.
Here is my flippant answer: I use macOS because I own a laptop with a touchpad that is actually worth using. On non-MacBooks, I prefer Linux.
I have a track point on my ThinkPad. I have disabled the touchpad to never look back.
I used a mac as my main computer for years, and found the shortcuts and other productivity items to be amazing. The cost, and generally sub-par hardware + weird security items makes me lean more to linux.
What do you mean the cost and subpar hardware? Even Linus Tech Tips (not an Apple fan) admits that for the specifications and build quality, Apple does not rip people off on their computers. They are competitively priced.
I've found Mac hardware to be great. I dare you to find any laptop with a trackpad as good as a MacBook Pro. However, I agree about the "weird security" that has come to the Mac in the past decade; that's one of my reasons for switching to Linux this year.
Wait a bit... With apple switching to ARM, will there finally be a native version of Minecraft: Bedrock Edition for macOS?
macOS: security feature
Chris: strange!
It's Hackintosh, right?
Yash Arya yes
You know it
I commented it on the first two minutes of the video actually.😅
This was quite a heck of a video.
But still i won't use mac ever....😇.
But as one of your subscriber i have a request to make . In one of your prior videos you said that it is possible to switch between distros without breaking the existing installation. And you also mentioned that it is possible to switch even file managers . So if you make a video(long or short your call 😇) which covers both these topics then it will be very helpful for all of us ( especially for new user like me😁).
Please take this under your consideration.
As always love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 😃 .
I wonder if you had issues installing from the App store because your on a VM? I had lots of issues in MacOS on VM that I didn't have on Apple hardware, especially anything tied into the ecosystem (iMessage, App Store, iCloud, etc)
I’m doing the Mac VM on arch now, and it is beyond painful. Trying to Passthrough my AMD GPU and all the rest, quite a challenge. Amazing that a kernel-based VM exists like KVM, but oh boy.
Install Linux on your Mac, a friend's imac 27 hdd died 4 years ago , fitted a SSD installed Ubuntu Mate , a bit of stuffing around to install. Worked a treat,
super fast, great graphics. They abuse this never do any updates still runs fine.
@Nathan Crabtree, “Mac OS is consistently getting worse” Agreed.
There's drag and drop system-wide, including into the terminal. You can drag and drop text, files (for their path), whatever.
To launch an app quicker, CMD+Space and type it's name.
Automator is awesome.
But the best thing about MacOS for me is how easy it is for doing daily stuff. Separating CMD+Tab (alternating applications) from CMD+~ (alternating windows) is outstandingly productive.
CMD+Q is also pretty useful for multi window apps.
It's really a great system for power users, without the headaches of Linux.
Also, if you're into color accuracy, MacOS' handling of color profiles for monitors is just... It just works. Specially in multimonitor setups. Mirroring two monitors and want to have different profiles? Sure. Windows doesn't do that. Besides, Windows leaves much of it to the software developer to implement. Linux hardly even handles color profiles.
I'm a developer and I use Macs primarily. These days you can't write anything that's without access to open source code, and macOS, with tools like homebrew and full access to GNU, is a natural. Most people seem to forget that macOS is a legit derivation of Unix - as Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc. - not a gimped or mini but a fully POSIX compliant Unix. You can try to create a dev environment on Windows, but the process is a royal pain, and even then things will break because a whole chunk of the toolset is missing depending on what you're developing. WSL works fairly well these days, only if all the pesky Windows stuff didn't get in the way. But if they remove that, it'll just end up as another Linux distro.
Most people mocking Macs/macOS are just kids who's never used one, and don't know a lick of Unix, meaning they don't grasp the full spectrum of computing. Often they've heard of Linux, and may even have a second boot of some distro du jour, but usually only to not look like a complete sap. That or it's just insurance to look cool/cooler than their gaming buddies. Yet they accuse Mac users of being too hip. Wish they would tell my fellow developers that, as most of them are working on bigdata crunching and AI on expensive, hipster, toy computers. Those idiots!
I sometimes game too, and it's equally a royal pain to get any decent titles to run on the Mac, because again, a good chunk of the toolset are missing, namely graphics API, though Metal shows promise, but only if enough game devs start using it.
I mean, believe it or not, some people don't care about customizable interfaces and tweaking with OS functionality. They want to install a program, have an easy shortcut to the program, and have features that help their workflow. And plenty of people find the features of MacOS helpful to their workflow.
In a way, Apple products are built for businesses more than they're built for end users. When there's little in the way of changing the interface, a business can keep their apps and workflow very consistent and streamlined. Both businesses I work at have either an ipod or iphone for store use.
It's not all about having the most options and the most freedom. Sometimes it's just about the work getting done.