Where did India lose the World Cup Final vs Australia? Cricbuzz Live decodes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лис 2023
  • India failed to defend 240 against Australia in the 2023 World Cup final. Where did Rohit & Co. lose the plot? Zaheer Khan & Parthiv Patel decode, on Cricbuzz Live
    #INDvsAUS #CWC23 #india #australia #worldcup #2023worldcup #2023odiworldcup #odiworldcup #cwc #rohitsharma #viratkohli #patcummins #davidwarner #stevesmith #shubmangill #klrahul #shreyasiyer #mohammedshami #mohammedsiraj #jaspritbumrah #kuldeepyadav #ravindrajadeja #suryakumaryadav #travishead #marnuslabuschagne #mitchellstarc #mitchellmarsh #joshhazlewood #adamzampa #glennmaxwell
    Watch more cricket videos - www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-vide...
    For more cricket updates and content - www.cricbuzz.com/​​
    For more updates on cricket follow us on facebook -
    / ​​
    Follow us on twitter to get cricket related news -
    / cricbuzz

КОМЕНТАРІ • 518

  • @cricbuzz

    If you enjoy this video - then LIKE & SHARE with fellow cricket fans. SUBSCRIBE to Cricbuzz channel for more stories around the game we love!

  • @danieljoseph2204

    The Indian Team is pampered by the media and the BCCI and the whole country. Australia went and played like real men despite all the criticism....Props to where is due....The Real men won...

  • @alansmitheejr.

    Australia made things happen, India were hoping for things to happen.

  • @cmadelaide56

    Without watching the video I’m going to guess the reasons put forward:

  • @debayanporel

    If bringing in Shami was not a desperate but a tactical decision then I don't know what actually desperation is. Suppose a team's top batsman has been their number 4 and in the final they have to chase 400. So that batsman will come to open to show that we are attacking? Come on Parthiv this was such a loose comment.

  • @binaldoshi495

    Ricky Ponting said in commentary - If Australia lose today, the management immediately starts thinking what can we do starting today to ensure that in 4 years we have a WC winning team. That is the mentality we need to build tournament winning teams. Very proud but also very disappointed in how some individual players (Rahul and Kohli) showed visible disappointment or slowed play on not getting/to achieve milestones. That was bad form.

  • @philhogan5623

    Australia's fielding was terrific. If you add up all the runs they saved it's almost like India being one batsman down, plus it puts extra pressure on and forces mistakes.

  • @shreyaa9214

    True May be India dint have belief that 240 is not enough. Because of which there were tactical changes in bowling like shami opening the bowling, Siraj coming to bowl in the 17th over, not putting enough pressure or attacking to pick wickets. Surprised to see no slip for spinner first time by ind in the tournament barring first few overs of spin. Leaking easy singles & waiting for a batsmen to make a mistake. India was playing with attacking mindset more against netherland match than in the final.

  • @ad_2211
    @ad_2211  +25

    Firstly congrats to the Australian team, they went in with a rock solid plan to contain Indian batting and pulled it off beautifully. The equation in this game was pretty simple, take out Rohit, Gill and Iyer cheaply who collectively scored nearly 250 runs in the semi and you have pretty much won the game, Kohli & Rahul got stuck in 3rd gear and scored what was expected of them to get India to 240 while they needed more like 350 to challenge Australia.

  • @raytracker521

    For me the game was lost during the Kohli, rahul partnership. No matter how good the bowling side is, you cannot be sooo defensive. You need to take a bit of calculated risks and disrupt the rhythm of the bowlers. No one even attacked the part time bowlers. Only 5 boundaries in the last 40 overs of a one day game is criminal batting. It's like they were playing with 250 runs target on their minds. Even Australia lost 3 early wickets but they didn't get back into the shells like India did. Yes they batted sensibly for a few overs but after that they also played their shots and broke the shackles. That is just poor pressure handling by team India.

  • @Seekingtruth239

    The main reason was our long tail. 8,9,10,11 are number 11 batsman. All are top class bowlers but none can make 10 runs at least consistently. That is why the main batsman have to make sure that they have to be there till the 50th over. Even if India made 200 in 40 over but lost 5 wickets, they are reluctant to shift the gear and go attacking in fear of India may not play full innings. Australia, South Africa and New Zealand bat deep. It was India’s Achilles weakness and Australia hit it hard, managed to get wickets in the middle orders. Remaining batsmen caught up with confusion when to attack and lost their wickets and didn’t score any.

  • @Robrulz666icloud

    Great achievement for India to make the World Cup final coming in unbeaten the Aussies 9 straight wins, Facts are no matter what india done OUR AUSSIE BOYS WERE NEVER LOSING 🇦🇺🏆🏏❤️🇦🇺 congratulations team AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺

  • @Yash-di2fp

    We are talking about attacking mindset during bowling but when you have 240 on board you can't . If there is need of attacking mindset than it's in middle overs during batting .

  • @KuchNahiBasAiseHi

    Since things have settling down now a bit, it looks like BCCI doing over the top stuff before final (air shows, captain parade, hosting PM for final) caused the unnecessary pressure on team and hence their meltdown. whereas on the opposite, Aus felt no to little pressure (their PM not visiting also helped in this sense).

  • @AbhishekSingh-fn1lo

    Actually it was a gamble taken by India in this big match by preparing such a dry and two paced pitch and it backfired. It seems that they hoped to have toss going their way so as to field first and trouble the Australian batsmen and restrict them to a low total. (you might think that Rohit also wanted to bat first as he said at the toss. But I dont think so. He also would have bowled first if he would have won the toss given how much the pitch was dry during the day. Its a tactical thing used by a Captain to say that nevertheless we also wanted to bat first in order to create doubts in the mind of opposition Captain whether he took the right decision or not) And then chase the total underlights when the pitch becomes easier to bat on. Unfortunately, that didnt happen from Indian perspective.

  • @davidparsons3432

    Credit where credit is due.....I see this as the greatest victory in Australian sport...considering what they faced in this tornament....140,000 Indians at home against an imperious Indian opposition......pure brilliance..there is no hindsight in sport it happens in the moment not after

  • @bemusedonlooker632

    Australia just seems to know how to win the big moments. That is really what counts. To play well in Round Robin matches, when the pressure is way less is one thing. But to play in the finals when it is a do or die, the Aussie just DO. South Africa must be happy, they will soon relinquish the title of chokers.

  • @kikigoga57

    Australien team were relaxed even after losing the 2 wickets

  • @vivekjain8418

    Missing things

  • @prasantkumarbehura1859

    India lost the match between 10-30 overs when kl n virat gone into hibernation, at that time ball was not that soft, they could have easily scored 5-6 per over, Indian players are trained to play in pitches like this. So no excuse, these bunch of players didn't have it, last t20 wc sf which was played in a better pitch India also played with defensive attitude