I cant tell you enough how greateful I am that you stuck with Myers Briggs an made it better even though you didint 110% belive in the system before you took the matter in to your own hands :D
There's no doubt in my mind that this is the right model to follow for legacy building. Humans have a meta-need to transcend their ego into the things in their environment. Legacy building is the pinnacle of what every human wants, but very few become aware of. In addition, we may create a pseudo-reality, or idealistic frame of mind that feels very grandiose, but if we don't work within the frame of practicality, then it holds very little weight in delivering our seeds of consciousness that withstands the test of time.
The best way for typing is honest self-reflection, that means culminating all of the knowledge you've obtained about the theory and your own experiences so far and come with a conclusion, it will take years, you will get mistyped often (Especialy you will fall into the trap of asking other's to type you, which most said other's can be just as subjective and biased), but I think the best one who can type you is yourself, by always fact-checking yourself and see if the any of your potential types fit.
I think you tapped into exactly what it means to build a business. You have to make it work objectively in reality. It has to be repeatable, you have to consistently be able to convince other people to give you their money in exchange for your product. And you have to be able to teach other people how to do the stuff you do to make the business work. (Aka employees). There’s no shortcut, no easy way out, no cutting corners. you need to have a goal and consciously be willing to go through so much pain to reach it. People don’t realize how hard it really is!!! it’s so painful!!!!
Do people (knowing we're being observed, or not) in laboratories behave the same as people behave in our natural environments (without knowing we're being observed)? Hmmm..
i would say to a trained observer, the speech patterns and underlying feelings and reasons can be spotted. its harder yes of course, youre onto something, but there are some things you cant hide long term. key words long term!
Im not sure you understand how science works. Consensus is important, but not because everyone has to agree. The whole purpose of getting a community involved is to help YOU discover new means of testing your theory. Thats all. There is no authority! Hell, there is not even such a thing as 'the scientific method'. There is no standard way of testing scientific theories. Often new theories require scientists to discover new testing methods.
Not necessarily, it really depends on whether or not your inquiry is goal-oriented or ontological in nature. The case that Dave is making is that MBTI isn't developing past perceived subjective congruence. It'll only ever attract certain groups of individuals that way and therefore remaining unconsolidated you could say. Then there's the problem that you have to convince a whole bunch of people to agree on the same measures so that typings can be accurate.
well this is not easy as you show us in your video , for example ,ENTP use Ne Ti which make him think for long term about almost everything , at same time he can be subjective a lot too , i think been subjective or objective is a choice for all types , it will be hard or easy depend on environment, knowledge and maturity , and you didn't say that in your video.
It's not easy, and Dave isn't saying so, what he means is, it's straightforward. It just takes real work and commitment. Of course it's a choice for all types, this topic is way beyond specific types, Dave himself is Ni/Fi, not exactly set up for objectivity out of the gate.
Sorry, i completely disagree with this. (as a 'subjectively biased dom Fi user!) The subjective person sees the world subjectively.. thus they want everyone to live a better life being directed + controlled internally not necessarily objectively on the outside by external authority. Internal satisfaction over external satisfaction. The subjective person sees the internal worlds of themselves and others as of more importance than the objective circumstances. Those who claim to be working for the greater good of everybody objectively are only seeing one part of the picture.. and thus cant claim to be 'thinking more about everyone else'... they are just thinking more about the common objective existence / the objects / physicality / external circumstances of the majority of peoples lives. the subjective person wants to impact and make a long lasting impression on everyone's lives internally in the same way. Te and Fe users are looking for outcomes - and thus dont see the value in 'teaching a man to fish' when just doing ABC will get the result. Fi and Ti users are people who make a long lasting impact on the world by investing in offering base principles to live by that last the test of time and can be applied in a wide variety of ways across generations.
I mean, JESUS. If you want a clear example of who makes a long lasting affect / impression of the world... have a look at ... well --> JESUS. Someone (whether you believe he is real or not) whose teachings were focussed on people's inner worlds. 'The kingdom of God is within'. Look at how many millions more peoples lives across generations that guys teachings have affected - creating the foundation for our rule of law / the foundational institutions like hopitals etc. countless spiritual practices that give people peace daily.. and so on. Try saying what you said here about Tony Robins by replacing him with Jesus and you'll see how your argument starts to fall apart.. Jesus dies and.... what has he got? nothin????
+C One question: How do you know, as an external observer, that the person in front of you is living his/her life according to his/her internal standards? If you can answer this question, you have found the cure to hypocrisy. :)
+The Last ENTP When an INFP gets on his/her high horse and try to LECTURE INTJs about the value of Fi and the irrelevance of Te, I usually sit down, grab the popcorn and watch the backlash. It's really entertaining. Cruel, but still entertaining... :)
Fayt Wind because he don't care about possibilities and opinions , he care about facts only , and because he know how to analysis mbti and use many ideas in his video's , its make him an INTJ ( Ni - Te ) , that why in his video show us subjective is something useless while objective is the best which i disagreed and i said why in another comment , by the way , I'm ENTP
Fayt Wind i did , he is INTJ , very calm and the only reason why he smile because the women next to him , i don't know if she wife or friend or whatever , i could be wrong about him but this would be unlikely , because he can't be INFJ ENFJ ENFP INTP ... we have only 3 options left ENTP ENTJ INTJ ENTP don't live in objective world on reality , and he looks like have an interest in objective thing's on reality , so I'm sure he is not ENTP , also ENTP body language full with energy not always but most of times now we only have ENTJ INTJ , both can use hard language but ENTJ use it almost anywhere and ENTJ body language is bossy , the INTJ also use hard language but not everywhere maybe when they want to say their opinions about something logical like his videos , also the body language calm , so ya i say he is INTJ by 85%.
This is one the best videos I have watched on YT. The pacing, information and conclusion. Why cant more people be this concise.
I cant tell you enough how greateful I am that you stuck with Myers Briggs an made it better even though you didint 110% belive in the system before you took the matter in to your own hands :D
Same. Do you speak spanish, paisano?
There's no doubt in my mind that this is the right model to follow for legacy building.
Humans have a meta-need to transcend their ego into the things in their environment. Legacy building is the pinnacle of what every human wants, but very few become aware of. In addition, we may create a pseudo-reality, or idealistic frame of mind that feels very grandiose, but if we don't work within the frame of practicality, then it holds very little weight in delivering our seeds of consciousness that withstands the test of time.
+Austin Dollar Excellent comment.
Object...subject...Reject...Who cares?
I want to have my cake, eat it and marry the pastry chef. Is that too much to ask? O_o
your desire is subjective.
The best way for typing is honest self-reflection, that means culminating all of the knowledge you've obtained about the theory and your own experiences so far and come with a conclusion, it will take years, you will get mistyped often (Especialy you will fall into the trap of asking other's to type you, which most said other's can be just as subjective and biased), but I think the best one who can type you is yourself, by always fact-checking yourself and see if the any of your potential types fit.
But I'll never be wrong if I live in Pseudo land...
I think you tapped into exactly what it means to build a business. You have to make it work objectively in reality. It has to be repeatable, you have to consistently be able to convince other people to give you their money in exchange for your product. And you have to be able to teach other people how to do the stuff you do to make the business work. (Aka employees). There’s no shortcut, no easy way out, no cutting corners. you need to have a goal and consciously be willing to go through so much pain to reach it. People don’t realize how hard it really is!!! it’s so painful!!!!
Jeriah Miller Im glad for the people who get the point of the video
About a year ago I was really obsessed with this! Could I borrow your Te?
Brilliant video, again, killin' it.
Great channel
Just study Epistemology (Bonus points for studying Ontology as well) and your life will be changed.
Do people (knowing we're being observed, or not) in laboratories behave the same as people behave in our natural environments (without knowing we're being observed)? Hmmm..
i would say to a trained observer, the speech patterns and underlying feelings and reasons can be spotted. its harder yes of course, youre onto something, but there are some things you cant hide long term. key words long term!
the question is, based on what?
Im not sure you understand how science works. Consensus is important, but not because everyone has to agree. The whole purpose of getting a community involved is to help YOU discover new means of testing your theory. Thats all. There is no authority! Hell, there is not even such a thing as 'the scientific method'. There is no standard way of testing scientific theories. Often new theories require scientists to discover new testing methods.
Not necessarily, it really depends on whether or not your inquiry is goal-oriented or ontological in nature. The case that Dave is making is that MBTI isn't developing past perceived subjective congruence. It'll only ever attract certain groups of individuals that way and therefore remaining unconsolidated you could say. Then there's the problem that you have to convince a whole bunch of people to agree on the same measures so that typings can be accurate.
well this is not easy as you show us in your video , for example ,ENTP use Ne Ti which make him think for long term about almost everything , at same time he can be subjective a lot too , i think been subjective or objective is a choice for all types , it will be hard or easy depend on environment, knowledge and maturity , and you didn't say that in your video.
It's not easy, and Dave isn't saying so, what he means is, it's straightforward. It just takes real work and commitment. Of course it's a choice for all types, this topic is way beyond specific types, Dave himself is Ni/Fi, not exactly set up for objectivity out of the gate.
Sorry, i completely disagree with this. (as a 'subjectively biased dom Fi user!) The subjective person sees the world subjectively.. thus they want everyone to live a better life being directed + controlled internally not necessarily objectively on the outside by external authority. Internal satisfaction over external satisfaction. The subjective person sees the internal worlds of themselves and others as of more importance than the objective circumstances. Those who claim to be working for the greater good of everybody objectively are only seeing one part of the picture.. and thus cant claim to be 'thinking more about everyone else'... they are just thinking more about the common objective existence / the objects / physicality / external circumstances of the majority of peoples lives. the subjective person wants to impact and make a long lasting impression on everyone's lives internally in the same way. Te and Fe users are looking for outcomes - and thus dont see the value in 'teaching a man to fish' when just doing ABC will get the result. Fi and Ti users are people who make a long lasting impact on the world by investing in offering base principles to live by that last the test of time and can be applied in a wide variety of ways across generations.
I mean, JESUS. If you want a clear example of who makes a long lasting affect / impression of the world... have a look at ... well --> JESUS. Someone (whether you believe he is real or not) whose teachings were focussed on people's inner worlds. 'The kingdom of God is within'. Look at how many millions more peoples lives across generations that guys teachings have affected - creating the foundation for our rule of law / the foundational institutions like hopitals etc. countless spiritual practices that give people peace daily.. and so on. Try saying what you said here about Tony Robins by replacing him with Jesus and you'll see how your argument starts to fall apart.. Jesus dies and.... what has he got? nothin????
+C One question: How do you know, as an external observer, that the person in front of you is living his/her life according to his/her internal standards?
If you can answer this question, you have found the cure to hypocrisy. :)
Ha gaaaayyyyyyyy
C Aren’t you biased though to your thinking. You have strong Fi so of course you’d say that
+The Last ENTP When an INFP gets on his/her high horse and try to LECTURE INTJs about the value of Fi and the irrelevance of Te, I usually sit down, grab the popcorn and watch the backlash. It's really entertaining. Cruel, but still entertaining... :)
I believe he’s an ENTP. 😜😜😜
Fayt Wind he is not
Well, what is he? Just don't tell me I'm wrong.
Fayt Wind because he don't care about possibilities and opinions , he care about facts only , and because he know how to analysis mbti and use many ideas in his video's , its make him an INTJ ( Ni - Te ) , that why in his video show us subjective is something useless while objective is the best which i disagreed and i said why in another comment , by the way , I'm ENTP
Hmm. Well this is the only video I found of him. Can you watch it and get back to me?
www.objectivepersonality.com/video-typing
Fayt Wind i did , he is INTJ , very calm and the only reason why he smile because the women next to him , i don't know if she wife or friend or whatever , i could be wrong about him but this would be unlikely , because he can't be INFJ ENFJ ENFP INTP ...
we have only 3 options left ENTP ENTJ INTJ
ENTP don't live in objective world on reality , and he looks like have an interest in objective thing's on reality , so I'm sure he is not ENTP , also ENTP body language full with energy not always but most of times
now we only have ENTJ INTJ , both can use hard language but ENTJ use it almost anywhere and ENTJ body language is bossy , the INTJ also use hard language but not everywhere maybe when they want to say their opinions about something logical like his videos , also the body language calm , so ya i say he is INTJ by 85%.
This is such a weird video... Why did you even make this? What is the point? Who is it for?