Ames Moot Court Competition 2004

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @Vardalon
    @Vardalon 4 роки тому +15

    This seems to foreshadow what would later happen in real life.

  • @raheyna8888
    @raheyna8888 3 роки тому +12

    RBG is ruthless! Loved the 27:27 part.

  • @DrtyMikeNDaBoyz
    @DrtyMikeNDaBoyz 3 роки тому +7

    Kind of nuts RBG mentions the new dean Elena Kagan, and 6 years later Kagan would be serving on SCOTUS with RBG

  • @seemachoubey6584
    @seemachoubey6584 4 роки тому +16

    The case was horribly argued by both parties in comparison with other Ames Debates.

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому +1

    Skinner v. Oklahoma-This case has been raised in the public arena😮😢.

  • @raheyna8888
    @raheyna8888 3 роки тому +4

    59:28 is a perfect example of why words matter.

  • @nunosantos485
    @nunosantos485 9 місяців тому +2

    The definition of marriage: “A man shall cleave unto his wife and they shall be one flesh”

  • @izzyyoo
    @izzyyoo 4 роки тому +15

    Rest In Peace Ruth

  • @raheyna8888
    @raheyna8888 3 роки тому +6

    Also, at 11:35 RBG sort of throws the other judge under the bus. The other judge is asking council something that RBG knows has nothing to do with his argument. Very funny...

  • @CollDott
    @CollDott 3 місяці тому

    Watching this drama in 2024 and a big woah!!

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому +1

    Okay I understand about Intermediate scrutiny 😊. But ‘Suspect versus Semi-suspect’ class is a different story 😮.

  • @chahinebinsaleh6954
    @chahinebinsaleh6954 4 роки тому +6

    All of the students did poorly. The petition especially could have had a stronger footing and much stronger basis of argument!

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому +1

    Okay I understand about Intermediate scrutiny 😊.

  • @junogeronimo9422
    @junogeronimo9422 7 років тому +24

    And then it became Obergefell :)

  • @GINGI9519
    @GINGI9519 3 роки тому +6

    Those side burns

  • @manuelcedillo.jrz.9337
    @manuelcedillo.jrz.9337 4 роки тому

    261-CPOD to be liable for all and everything personal costs.

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому

    In Virginia v. Loving, the right to marry is considered a fundamental right that is protected by the Constitution of the United States.😮

  • @Derexican
    @Derexican 2 роки тому +2

    14:50 did she really say that the Bible (because it's such an old text) should serve as the basis for laws that the government implements or refuses to implement?...hmm

  • @Derexican
    @Derexican 2 роки тому +3

    1st Guy-the best one out of very bad finalists. 2nd guy-not sure he even knows what he's talking about. 3rd guy-Painfully bad to watch (especially the hand theater) considering he makes no real arguments and just asserts a confidence wholly unsupported by talent or expertise. 4th guy-embarrassed himself but wasn't as painfully bad as 2 and 3.

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому

    Alienage? Is that really a group?

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому

    The difference between heterosexual and homosexual couples is not clear 😮.

  • @clareowen2047
    @clareowen2047 3 роки тому +1

    Get ya hair done

  • @christopherbowen2547
    @christopherbowen2547 5 років тому +4

    Always refrain from waving hands. Keep them out of sight. Very distracting.

  • @ИринаКим-ъ5ч
    @ИринаКим-ъ5ч 2 місяці тому

    Garcia Donald Anderson Jeffrey Anderson Angela

  • @rondarousy9338
    @rondarousy9338 4 роки тому

    The quick mallet shortly scribble because engineer congruently earn onto a aromatic rugby. erratic, telling bongo

  • @roxannepedlar7763
    @roxannepedlar7763 7 місяців тому

    The difference between heterosexual and homosexual couples is not clear 😮.