He also mimics his forehand. Look at how Kyrgios is hitting forehands in the other clips compared to vs nadal. He does the whip forehand against Nadal, and a more traditional "windshield wiper" forehand against the rest. Amazing how he can maintain effectiveness while mimicing him lol
Better be joke how people think kyrgios is better than Federer. He is literally a bad sportsmanship. Roger is a humble player and sportsmanship player. He is a better player.
uranfaggit no way. The reason murray was a part of big 4 is his consistency and his unmatched ability to push the rest of big 4 than any other players. The only reason it was not big 5 with wawrinka is his lack of consistency as of murray. And zverev is not even close to stan
uranfaggit if you cant understand what i wrote you should learn to read. I wrote murray’s position in big4 in past tense, because big4 was in past tense. Without murray there is no big4
@Bud Kaiwi The thing with Acapulco was it was almost like he was a pantomime villain, where they knew he was an amazing player but booed him cause it was fun and cause he encouraged them to do it. Then in the final he got the support he deserved and it probably felt weird to him lol
Nick has a 50% win percentage against the big 3. This is the highest ever. It includes a 100% win percentage against Djokovic too Edit: This is now much lower. Thiem has the highest. Plus Kyrgios record vs top 10 in slams is disgusting
He is an awesome player when he is patient and work the points but when he rush them he can be the most boring player to watch. If he work more with his mind he could be top 5 without problems for a lot of years.
If he had the work ethic of someone like Dominic Thiem he would be a consistent top 5 player. But alas he's more interested in not being boring, where he gets to define what's boring. Almost as if winning a lot is a boring and he wants to be the floater, the under dog that everyone wants to avoid. He's more interested in that being his story than that of a decorated champion. To each his own, but ultimately he won't be remembered beyond this generation.
@@rafael-sx5go im not the optimistic guy who advice anyone to look to be remembered but believe me your sentence is way beyond wrong. cause there is people that we still talk about thousands of years after their death... and that actually boggles my mind at times.
Well personally I find him very entertaining to watch, and I like seeing a tennis player that isn't always try harding, but also plays the game for fun and to entertain others. Not every tennis player is destined to be decorated champions. This is his style, and if he enjoys that than good on him.
He’s playing a GAME how he wants. And he’s beating the best. And here you are talking about who’s going to be remembered for hitting a ball over a net in future generations....
wouldn't put him in the same boat as Adebayor, he's not that much of a dickhead. he's more like Quaresma, insanely talented, just doesn't put the effort in or have the desire to be the best
I won’t put him with Messi. Nick is entertaining but Messi and Federer are the ones who make their respective games look beautiful and effortless to watch even at extreme competitive level.
@@nprwikeepa6082 When Kyrgios has won as many 1000 masters, grand slams and Olympic medals as Murray can talk about. Whether you like it or not, Murray has been the one who has posed the most problems for the current big3 and with such a track record he humbly deserves his place. 😉
No. Im a huge fed fan. There is a big 4. But the fouth is no where near the big 3. Hes part of the big because if we take the fifth six sevent eigth and ninth players achivements. Add all of them. Only then it'll equate to murray's achivements.
sora roxas that is about right its like in football where ronaldo and messi are the big two and neymar used to be the third big not because he was on their level but because he was better than the rest
@@haziq12ish Yes, there is a big 4 and a big 5 etc. It's just that when nr. 1, 2 and 3 have so similar skil level and the gap between 3 and 4 is big, it makes sense to let 3 be the cut off.
This guy's got some incredible talent. Out of all things I'm actually worried this talent is going to go waste if not used to its full potential. Come on Kyrgios just do your thing please.
@@ricardchillonpt153 total respect for Ronaldinho. Kyrgios had the potential to become the Ronaldinho of tennis, but it looks like he actually became more like the Balotelli of tennis, unfortunately.
A handful of crowd pleasing shots isn't enough to get you to number 1. You need to win week in week out against all types of players. You need to have a Plan B and Plan C. You need to be able to dig deep when not playing well. You need to be able to stay fit. He's not even close to being a world no 1. His return is ordinary, his game management and attitude are dreadful. He's a very very passive player and in my opinion has too many deficiencies to be a long term no 1. He might get to no 1, but a lot would have to change and frankly I don't think it will.
Emmanuel Chiu his inconsistency comes from injury coz he probably doesn’t train as hard as he should. But he’s easily the most talented in the new round of players
He's technically gifted. If nothing goes wrong, he should be a top player to be reckoned with after the Top 3 retires. What makes him really good is, not only is he aware of what's happening at his side of the court, he's also aware of the position his opponents are. His court awareness is one of the top. And with his skills, he'll go places.
It's good to see someone going for his shots,for his character,for his personality,for his right to be different,for trying to be the way he chose to be.
If anybody's not aware - Kyrgios's h2h against Big 4, the exhibition matches not included: 3:3 vs Nadal 1:3 vs Federer - 3 of 4 matches were super close and ended in 3 set tiebreaks though, Kyrgios won 1 of those 1:5 vs Murray - the only Big 4 player Kyrgios can't really figure out, the losses were very straightforward and the only win came in 2018 with Murray coming back from injury 2:0 vs Djokovic - Djoko still hasn't beaten (or won a set) him outside of exhibition matches 7:11 in total, not bad!
@@minifik He beat him before Wimbledon, in Queens I think. As far as grand slams go (including their meeting at Wimbledon) he always got absolutely trashed by Murray.
Murray is definitely better as he has won the world tour finals, been number 1, won 2 Olympic gold, and has a better h2h over Wawrinka. That being said though, the Big three is still better than Murray.
@Theodwros Vanezis Majors are not everything in tennis, Murray and Wawrinka are the textbook example of this. Murray has been world's #1, won two olympic gold medals, a Davis Cup, the WTF, a ton of Masters 1000 and has made it into 11 Slam finals. He also has a very good h2h against everyone not called Federer, Nadal or Djokovic. Wawrinka is a great player, but he is nowhere near Murray.
@Theodwros Vanezis I agree that Murray and Wawrinka aren't as good as the Big 3, but majors aren't the only thing that matters. Even though they both have 3 majors, Murray simply has had more feats, and frankly I would argue a more successful career. You can disagree with me if you want but this has been a great conversation.
Kyrgios and Tsistipas are extremely talented, have a tremendous personality (sometimes they're really cocky) and they're not afraid of beting the legends like Federer or Djokovic. Maybe one day that will be the main rivalry in tennis.
I know a thing or two about tennis , and Nick is has got it all ! Concentration , pressure, mean nothing to him ! And that 's good ! I love the guy ! I hated the Connors, MacEnroe and the Agassi but I love Nick !
I am tennis coach. Nick has elite racket head speed and great touch, big serve and moves well for a guy his size. Everything else is a mess. His decision making on the court is bad. You can make a highlight compilation video for any top 50 player on tour. In actual matches, he lacks the discipline to keep making the correct strategic decisions. He'll get impatient and let it rip down the line instead of maintaining the cross court rally. He lacks the patience to play middle to middle and build his points. His backhand is pretty average, his return of serve is nothing special. He's not a player I would want my students to emulate or learn from, except for his racket head speed which is special. He's great for those who aren't really into tennis and might tune in if he's playing. For those who love tennis, they usually get the kick out of watching the strategic chess matches between Rafa, Novak and Federer
This guy is a mixture of super players; Safin power, Murray's Touch, Athleticism and serve of Sampras, crazy as himself xD. He needs to take tennis more seriously, he would be definitely a challenge to the very top players.
He has all the talent in the world to be one of best or even win grandslams. Only thing letting him down is his attitude. Same with his other tennis buddy tomic.
I disagree. There was a huge element of luck in this in that Nadal's reverse backhand smash was weak and poorly directed. If it was Federer instead of Nadal, the smash would have been a winner. There are other points in this video that outshines this point.... eg. the point at 1:49 is pure endurance and skill.
If he comes trough to very top only future will tell, but he has all the shoots and amazing feel for the ball, he's just the most excitable player on tour to watch. The problem is he thinks he is the best there is and sometimes that's enough for him. He can beat No.1 and then loose to No. 100 the next day...
Has he actually made any comments that indicate he thinks that way? Kyrgios has always been great in interviews as far as his relations with other players are concerned. I get why anybody would be lacking motivation against weaker opponents though, happens in literally every sport. It's not as fun or challenging and I'm fairly certain the players would rather get this over with than stay in the match, sometimes that impatience backfires though.
@David Hoang but that's what the 'big 4' stands about. I mean was standing. Till Murray's injury in 2017. So now it's big 3, cuz from 2017 big 3 won all grand slams.
Par excellent entertainment and exhibition coupled with excellent aces. I'd like to see him win at least ONE grand slam in the next 5 years or else he will share the pedestal with the likes of Gael and Gilles. My best wishes are with him.
@@marcusbrsp I'd say more that he's divisive. I personally love him for his distinct persona and how outspoken he is. However I can easily see how people can dislike that. But the fact that he gets people talking about himself is a win for him in my books.
@@DuGongggg being outspoken is not my issue with him. If anything it feels authentic compared to when someone like Nadal says the same thing over and over again in every interview: _I gonna haff to try my best if I gonna haff any chance against him_ when he is up against a top 80 ranked opponent in the second round of a grand slam. That is just silly. My issue with Kyrgios is he acts like a 5 year old on the court when things aren't going his way. He doesn't fight. Just terrible mentality overall. A complete waste of extraordinary talent.
I don't care he's volatile and bad tempered , his tennis is dynamic and thrilling to watch . If he could focus he has the potential to be better than the current world top 3 , Federra has gone now so top 2 .
He is a world class tennisplayer...if he is in the mood
A class player...is always in the mood 😎
He shit....whether he plays well or not, he's a total shithole
Inconsistency is found in tennis players like him. Monfils is really good sometimes but he’ll never be part of the top 3 because he isn’t like them
Hes like ash's charizard from season 1 lol
@@HighTierMike A talented asshole
Beats one of the big 3
Loses to world number 134
That's Kyrgios folks 🤩🤦♂️
The top 3 have won 52 Grand slams and this idiot at best is a talented asshole.
54
I know but I still enjoy watching him play
If he cared about this sport like the big 3 do, best believe he’d be number 1. He literally doesn’t care or try against anyone else
@@harrysaluja9890 55
He only grunts when nadal is grunting 😂
Federer - Comment
Kyrgios - Like
He also mimics his forehand. Look at how Kyrgios is hitting forehands in the other clips compared to vs nadal. He does the whip forehand against Nadal, and a more traditional "windshield wiper" forehand against the rest. Amazing how he can maintain effectiveness while mimicing him lol
Better be joke how people think kyrgios is better than Federer. He is literally a bad sportsmanship. Roger is a humble player and sportsmanship player. He is a better player.
Fireball Dude Federer is better but sportsmanship doesn’t define if you’re better in skill.
He’s trolling
Kyrgios only plays seriously against the big 4 and in team tournaments
Is strange but is a dream for tennis player And laver Cup
Brian Liu he seemed to play seriously vs Zverov yesterday
@@pappisto probs because he's world no 3
uranfaggit no way. The reason murray was a part of big 4 is his consistency and his unmatched ability to push the rest of big 4 than any other players. The only reason it was not big 5 with wawrinka is his lack of consistency as of murray. And zverev is not even close to stan
uranfaggit if you cant understand what i wrote you should learn to read. I wrote murray’s position in big4 in past tense, because big4 was in past tense. Without murray there is no big4
Genetically engineered to troll
Underrated comment, haha.
Won Acapulco... Just to piss off the crowd.
@Bud Kaiwi The thing with Acapulco was it was almost like he was a pantomime villain, where they knew he was an amazing player but booed him cause it was fun and cause he encouraged them to do it. Then in the final he got the support he deserved and it probably felt weird to him lol
kh2freek the crowd was bandwagoning, then started cheering for kygrios once he started winning
Are you genetically engineered to whine like a little bitch?
Nick has a 50% win percentage against the big 3. This is the highest ever. It includes a 100% win percentage against Djokovic too
Edit: This is now much lower. Thiem has the highest. Plus Kyrgios record vs top 10 in slams is disgusting
And 0/0 grandslams
And 100% spoilt child percentage as well 😉
He defeated Djokovic twice in his worst year : 2017
I would have been interested to watch him against Nole in 2015 as Djokovic was almost unbeatable
He also has a 25% win percentage against Gasquet, sorry to tell you that mate
@@raybans8712 He has so much potential, it's a pity he isn't more disciplined or he could be the best.
Unreal talent.
You hate him or you love him. No more options. Let's go Kygs, keep it up 🔥
I love him
I love him when he plays well
I've hated and loved him over the years
He is an awesome player when he is patient and work the points but when he rush them he can be the most boring player to watch. If he work more with his mind he could be top 5 without problems for a lot of years.
W Nij the problem is some of his best shots here were on the run with not time to think
If he had the work ethic of someone like Dominic Thiem he would be a consistent top 5 player. But alas he's more interested in not being boring, where he gets to define what's boring. Almost as if winning a lot is a boring and he wants to be the floater, the under dog that everyone wants to avoid. He's more interested in that being his story than that of a decorated champion. To each his own, but ultimately he won't be remembered beyond this generation.
nobody is remembered forever anyways
@@rafael-sx5go where the f that come from
@@rafael-sx5go im not the optimistic guy who advice anyone to look to be remembered but believe me your sentence is way beyond wrong. cause there is people that we still talk about thousands of years after their death... and that actually boggles my mind at times.
Well personally I find him very entertaining to watch, and I like seeing a tennis player that isn't always try harding, but also plays the game for fun and to entertain others. Not every tennis player is destined to be decorated champions. This is his style, and if he enjoys that than good on him.
He’s playing a GAME how he wants. And he’s beating the best. And here you are talking about who’s going to be remembered for hitting a ball over a net in future generations....
this guy has SO much talent. He's got the natural ability of Messi but unfortunately, the application of Adebayor.
couldnt have put it better
wouldn't put him in the same boat as Adebayor, he's not that much of a dickhead. he's more like Quaresma, insanely talented, just doesn't put the effort in or have the desire to be the best
@James MacDonald
I agree sir
I won’t put him with Messi. Nick is entertaining but Messi and Federer are the ones who make their respective games look beautiful and effortless to watch even at extreme competitive level.
@@__jan6113 What do you mean? When kyrgios is at his best adding to his highlight reels, it looks completely effortless as well.
Nick's grown on me. I really enjoy watching him play.
His goal isnt winning trophies, it's his desire to beat the big players.
I think that’s correct he likes the big stage and theatre, maybe he should be a politician 🤣
I love that Nick can make the greatest tennis players go sweat. Very talented performer.
Only Murray fans speak of "the big four"
Haha and here I spent the whole video thinking Kyrgios was number 4
@@nprwikeepa6082 When Kyrgios has won as many 1000 masters, grand slams and Olympic medals as Murray can talk about. Whether you like it or not, Murray has been the one who has posed the most problems for the current big3 and with such a track record he humbly deserves his place. 😉
No. Im a huge fed fan. There is a big 4. But the fouth is no where near the big 3. Hes part of the big because if we take the fifth six sevent eigth and ninth players achivements. Add all of them. Only then it'll equate to murray's achivements.
sora roxas that is about right its like in football where ronaldo and messi are the big two and neymar used to be the third big not because he was on their level but because he was better than the rest
@@haziq12ish Yes, there is a big 4 and a big 5 etc. It's just that when nr. 1, 2 and 3 have so similar skil level and the gap between 3 and 4 is big, it makes sense to let 3 be the cut off.
This guy's got some incredible talent. Out of all things I'm actually worried this talent is going to go waste if not used to its full potential.
Come on Kyrgios just do your thing please.
This guy is the tennis' version of Ronaldinho. Hopefully he will use his unreal talent wisely and start winning majors soon. C'mon Nick!
Respect to Ronaldinho that won WC and Champions and defeating Real Madrid with amazing goals... Respect
@@ricardchillonpt153 total respect for Ronaldinho. Kyrgios had the potential to become the Ronaldinho of tennis, but it looks like he actually became more like the Balotelli of tennis, unfortunately.
@@gmmgmmg I was exactly thinking this mate :D
Ronaldinho actually won trophies
we are so lucky to be alive during the reign of the greatest tennis player of all time NICK KYRGIOS!
Novak Djokovic est le meilleur de tous les temps mdr
@@TonyStarkLeGOATactually no its Tony Stark
If only he tried... he could be number 1
No, he couldn't.
He doesn't have any of the qualities of Federer, Nadal or Djokovic.
He’s one of the few who has beaten once every big four player.
Too bad he’s inconstant.
@@masters.1000 He does. His serve, volley, feel, and forehand are good enough to get him to beat the likes of Zverve--or at least be part of them.
A handful of crowd pleasing shots isn't enough to get you to number 1. You need to win week in week out against all types of players. You need to have a Plan B and Plan C. You need to be able to dig deep when not playing well. You need to be able to stay fit.
He's not even close to being a world no 1. His return is ordinary, his game management and attitude are dreadful. He's a very very passive player and in my opinion has too many deficiencies to be a long term no 1.
He might get to no 1, but a lot would have to change and frankly I don't think it will.
Emmanuel Chiu his inconsistency comes from injury coz he probably doesn’t train as hard as he should. But he’s easily the most talented in the new round of players
This guy is insane and so talented 🔥
Respect for Nole ... only 1 of the big 3 that is not salty against Nick as this video shows. Now that's a champ.
This man is a joy to watch tbh
He's technically gifted. If nothing goes wrong, he should be a top player to be reckoned with after the Top 3 retires. What makes him really good is, not only is he aware of what's happening at his side of the court, he's also aware of the position his opponents are. His court awareness is one of the top. And with his skills, he'll go places.
It's good to see someone going for his shots,for his character,for his personality,for his right to be different,for trying to be the way he chose to be.
He has got some brave shot selection... Also very unpredictable...
You need some surprise element to beat the big 3...
He may be erratic, but I am seeing him grow as a serious contender. The game needs him. Goooo K Man!
Pas encore malheureusement
His skill is almost unbelievable
These never get old.
If anybody's not aware - Kyrgios's h2h against Big 4, the exhibition matches not included:
3:3 vs Nadal
1:3 vs Federer - 3 of 4 matches were super close and ended in 3 set tiebreaks though, Kyrgios won 1 of those
1:5 vs Murray - the only Big 4 player Kyrgios can't really figure out, the losses were very straightforward and the only win came in 2018 with Murray coming back from injury
2:0 vs Djokovic - Djoko still hasn't beaten (or won a set) him outside of exhibition matches
7:11 in total, not bad!
I guess, against Murray he is bored and unmotivated. He beat Murray where it really counts, in Wimbledon. lol
@@minifik He beat him before Wimbledon, in Queens I think. As far as grand slams go (including their meeting at Wimbledon) he always got absolutely trashed by Murray.
@@minifik he's good friends with murray
This guy made me start watching tennis!!
well I ve never been a tennis fan, but this guy is the reason to watch it
Just take popcorn sit back and wait for #onlybigthree comments
Murray is definitely better as he has won the world tour finals, been number 1, won 2 Olympic gold, and has a better h2h over Wawrinka. That being said though, the Big three is still better than Murray.
@Theodwros Vanezis Majors are not everything in tennis, Murray and Wawrinka are the textbook example of this. Murray has been world's #1, won two olympic gold medals, a Davis Cup, the WTF, a ton of Masters 1000 and has made it into 11 Slam finals. He also has a very good h2h against everyone not called Federer, Nadal or Djokovic. Wawrinka is a great player, but he is nowhere near Murray.
@Theodwros Vanezis I agree that Murray and Wawrinka aren't as good as the Big 3, but majors aren't the only thing that matters. Even though they both have 3 majors, Murray simply has had more feats, and frankly I would argue a more successful career. You can disagree with me if you want but this has been a great conversation.
The big 3, and then Murray always on the fringes, but never as good as them.
Jugador de gran nivel...además de brindar un buen espectáculo en cada partido 👍
How does he not have a grand slam yet? Unreal talent
4 ans plus tard il en a toujours pas😅😅
@@TonyStarkLeGOAThes got the aus open doubles, which counts as a grand slam
Most entertaining and talented player of the new gen. I wonder what it will take for him to move up to no1 as he deserves.
Love Nick....hope he wins a 1000 trophy soon.
He won't
Kinda like Quaresma and Kevin Prince Boateng in a tennis player...
Well he's quite the Quaresmatic player I'll give him that 😉
I am from Serbia and Kyrgios is my favorite
What a legend what a tenniser what a joker
We always like that one tennis player who memes in his games
Kyrgios and Tsistipas are extremely talented, have a tremendous personality (sometimes they're really cocky) and they're not afraid of beting the legends like Federer or Djokovic. Maybe one day that will be the main rivalry in tennis.
What do you say in those cases ? Ah yes, "this did not age well"
Hes bringing the flair,swag and attitude, that every other major sport besides tennis and golf have. This is what the game needs
When nick plays he entertains the crowd.. that's for sure..
That match at 2:45 produced some quality tennis , Far better than many gs matches between big 4.
Got to love him, he is soooooooooooo talented....
I love kyrgios...
everyone says you either love him or hate him, i think he's a peanut but i absolutely respect and admire his tennis skills.
So you love him AND hate him.
Anyone hear that phantom Nadal grunt at 2:23?
yea
If only this man could hold his temper a little bit more he could have been the greatest player to sey foot in a tennis court EVER
I know a thing or two about tennis , and Nick is has got it all !
Concentration , pressure, mean nothing to him ! And that 's good !
I love the guy ! I hated the Connors, MacEnroe and the Agassi but I love Nick !
I am tennis coach. Nick has elite racket head speed and great touch, big serve and moves well for a guy his size. Everything else is a mess. His decision making on the court is bad. You can make a highlight compilation video for any top 50 player on tour. In actual matches, he lacks the discipline to keep making the correct strategic decisions. He'll get impatient and let it rip down the line instead of maintaining the cross court rally. He lacks the patience to play middle to middle and build his points. His backhand is pretty average, his return of serve is nothing special. He's not a player I would want my students to emulate or learn from, except for his racket head speed which is special. He's great for those who aren't really into tennis and might tune in if he's playing. For those who love tennis, they usually get the kick out of watching the strategic chess matches between Rafa, Novak and Federer
@@ren2871 I agree !
Tennis needs him..we need him..grandslam trophies needs him..
to me hes the most gifted ..with the most outrageous shots
Fun to watch him play.
i don't like his attitude most often but I love his game. there's no denying he has a TON of talent.
Who else wondered who the fourth of the "Big Four" was? Murray hardly deserves to be lumped together with F, N, and D that way.
The way he whips the forehand it’s makes an incredibly fast ball
A player that can be top 3 easily (a lot of quality) but prefer to be a troll 😂😂 love Kyrgios
No, he couldnt be top 3. Not only does he lack the mental qualities needed, there are many aspects of his game that are quite average.
easily? lmao 😂
Dre xdxddxx
Lol easily?? What is he like 36th in ranking. Please!
Moto Life yes easily, if you dont understand tennis..
Make a video of all his match points vs the big 4 please
5:25 he did the "Nadal shot"
Some great videos.
great talent with a lot of feeling for space,ball....
The real Big 3: Tomic, Kyrgios and Dustin Brown
hh you're right!
Instead of Tomic Monfils I would say
imla ughtuing s ohard really dudy xD
Not Dustin. Should be Paire.
I thought those were Karlovic, Isner and Anderson.
He's the definition of winning doesn't matter, having fun is all that matters
its crazy how he's always so close with them in terms of scoring
This guy is a mixture of super players; Safin power, Murray's Touch, Athleticism and serve of Sampras, crazy as himself xD. He needs to take tennis more seriously, he would be definitely a challenge to the very top players.
He already is a challenge. I’m sure the big guys are twitching every time just before they go up against him
The guy is superhuman at times 👌🎾
00:39 Nick hit every fancy shot in the book
A no look, reverse tweener, tweener, drop shot
All this from a guy who can serve 140+mph. Could be a great player...
He is fantastic
Australian young bull. Top wild player🎾.
It's "Big 3 and Murray" not "Big 4"
For me, the best of all
He will get multiple wins against top players in his career. Im scared he wont capitalize on them and retire without any big trophies.
U are the Best tennis 🎾 player in 2021
Is the only guy with delpo (out of the big 4) who can beat nadal
He has all the talent in the world to be one of best or even win grandslams. Only thing letting him down is his attitude. Same with his other tennis buddy tomic.
When nick isn’t competing in Australia, he is like the antagonist. Nick Is a amazing player
All this without showing off his great serve. Come on Nick, don't disappoint us.
imagine if all the big four retired before Kyrgios came: “I can beat all the big four. im the strongest tennis player in the world.”
Nadal 22
Federer 20
Djokovic 20
Murray 3
"big 4"
This man is crazy
Awesome personality
Big shots when it's not important, in clutch moments he disappeare! This is Kyrgios
😂
My fave tennis player 😂❤
The point against Nadal at 3:34 is exceptional. Not even Federer could have done that
Yes and the very next point too!!
It is. Not sure why Federer wouldn't have been able to do the same, however.
I disagree. There was a huge element of luck in this in that Nadal's reverse backhand smash was weak and poorly directed. If it was Federer instead of Nadal, the smash would have been a winner. There are other points in this video that outshines this point.... eg. the point at 1:49 is pure endurance and skill.
If he comes trough to very top only future will tell, but he has all the shoots and amazing feel for the ball, he's just the most excitable player on tour to watch. The problem is he thinks he is the best there is and sometimes that's enough for him. He can beat No.1 and then loose to No. 100 the next day...
Has he actually made any comments that indicate he thinks that way? Kyrgios has always been great in interviews as far as his relations with other players are concerned.
I get why anybody would be lacking motivation against weaker opponents though, happens in literally every sport. It's not as fun or challenging and I'm fairly certain the players would rather get this over with than stay in the match, sometimes that impatience backfires though.
He is in history yet
Andy Murray's is not comparable to Nadal, Federer and Djokovic
What the hell is big 4? How can you put Murray in same group with Federer, Nadal and Djokovic? Please explain me?
@moose malden rofl
@moose malden that makes him an even smaller four? No?
3 slams, 2 olympic medals (nadal 1, federer & djoko none), & only one to be #1 in their same period. Whatelse do u need?
hichamb1 it’s just 3 slams doesn’t compare to 15 ish it’s 5 times as many slams
How in the world do you include Murray with the big 3? just look at the grand slams alone.
u know nothing about tennis, do you?
no and stfo who cares anymore
Big 4 is a group of 4 players, who mostly reaches the semifinal of a huge tournament , where all 4 are participating, masters and gs
@David Hoang but that's what the 'big 4' stands about. I mean was standing. Till Murray's injury in 2017. So now it's big 3, cuz from 2017 big 3 won all grand slams.
@David Hoang if he's going to be at semis in every big event, well, yes, it will be called big 3, if he win slams or Masters, also.
Par excellent entertainment and exhibition coupled with excellent aces. I'd like to see him win at least ONE grand slam in the next 5 years or else he will share the pedestal with the likes of Gael and Gilles. My best wishes are with him.
Nick's the best!
2:52 that spin :D
Wawrinka has as many grand slams as Murray, how the fuck is there a Big 4?!?
Talent v talent + application
Spectacular!!!
He got class 👌👌👌
Unlikeable person. But a very talented tennis player. Could easily be top 5 if he had a different mentality.
You are the unlikeable one. Complain, just only you feel jealousy over him being so gifted while you earn money by cleaning others toilets
@@nicolastg3377 I think you are too ungifted to understand my point, kiddo. Maybe when you get older, like 14-15, you will get it.
@@marcusbrsp I wouldn't say he's unlikeable... I like him and so do many other people
@@marcusbrsp I'd say more that he's divisive. I personally love him for his distinct persona and how outspoken he is. However I can easily see how people can dislike that. But the fact that he gets people talking about himself is a win for him in my books.
@@DuGongggg being outspoken is not my issue with him. If anything it feels authentic compared to when someone like Nadal says the same thing over and over again in every interview: _I gonna haff to try my best if I gonna haff any chance against him_ when he is up against a top 80 ranked opponent in the second round of a grand slam. That is just silly.
My issue with Kyrgios is he acts like a 5 year old on the court when things aren't going his way. He doesn't fight. Just terrible mentality overall. A complete waste of extraordinary talent.
My man, with more practice and hard work he could be so much better. I really enjoy watching his matches, this man can player amazing tennis...
Simply amazing. I think his possibilities of winning against big4 are the highest. Actually how about it?
I don't care he's volatile and bad tempered , his tennis is dynamic and thrilling to watch . If he could focus he has the potential to be better than the current world top 3 , Federra has gone now so top 2 .
3:55 did federer just grunt?
Yep