Does Math Disprove the Eternality of God?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 518

  • @boris8787
    @boris8787 4 дні тому +30

    Let's worship Jesus Christ *SEVEN* days a week - one day is not enough. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @infamousarturo
      @infamousarturo 3 дні тому +1

      Even Jesus said to worship the father not him.
      John 4:23

    • @T0Mmichael1234
      @T0Mmichael1234 3 дні тому

      ​@@infamousarturo
      "That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth NOT the Son honoureth NOT the Father which hath sent Him."
      John 5:23

    • @guslarscheid3606
      @guslarscheid3606 3 дні тому +1

      @@infamousarturo Doesn't say that

  • @gi169
    @gi169 4 дні тому +24

    Thank you CrossExamined. Merry Christmas...

  • @phoenixgamer1565
    @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +26

    This is why I prefer to say that only God is eternal (No beginning and no end). While humans and angels, on the other hand, are everlasting (created at a certain point in time and continue on forever). The question is where will we spend eternity?

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +5

      Well, that is the story

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +1

      @@lawrenceeason8007 That is reality. Mark of the beast will be your proof and you will still reject Jesus? It's coming.

    • @CheckmateSurvivor
      @CheckmateSurvivor 4 дні тому

      In Hell, if we are bad people.

    • @hhh-et2vi
      @hhh-et2vi 4 дні тому

      You ask where will we likely spend eternity? Make sure to take knee pads with you, If you're gonna end up in the christian heaven, you'll be on your knees every time god or jesus stroll past you.

    • @hhh-et2vi
      @hhh-et2vi 4 дні тому +1

      But seriously.I say that after life will be exactly like it was before I had life, and I have no problem with that at all. But if you want to use your imagination, anything is possible.

  • @brosebrose4154
    @brosebrose4154 4 дні тому +22

    May the Holy Spirit guide all Muslims,Buddhist,Hindu,Agnostic and Atheist to God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.

    • @albaraka7519
      @albaraka7519 4 дні тому +2

      Or you could simply provide the evidence showing a god is real.

    • @plowhand5591
      @plowhand5591 3 дні тому

      ​@@albaraka7519 You are probably a bot. But if not, please read Evidence That Demands a Verdict by Josh McDowell. I’m not here to argue. I wish you well. Maranatha.

    • @Freedom89657
      @Freedom89657 3 дні тому +1

      @@albaraka7519 I propose that no matter how much "evidence" one provided you, you still would not believe. The problem is not the amount of evidence, but the condition of one's heart.

    • @mattr.1887
      @mattr.1887 3 дні тому

      If evidence is irrelevant, then anything could be true.

    • @albaraka7519
      @albaraka7519 3 дні тому

      @@Freedom89657 "I propose that no matter how much "evidence" one provided you, you still would not believe." And you would be incorrect in saying that. "The problem is not the amount of evidence, but the condition of one's heart." That's just a cop out theists resort to.

  • @larzman651
    @larzman651 4 дні тому +4

    Psalms 119:105 - NUN. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
    2 Timothy 3:16 - All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
    Romans 15:4 - For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.
    Psalms 119:11 - Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.
    2 Timothy 2:15 - Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth

  • @loganschockelt
    @loganschockelt 4 дні тому +5

    Oh Frank... Once, 20years ago, you sparked a revelation with your book; now with a brief video! Thank You!

  • @DanielBoone1933
    @DanielBoone1933 2 дні тому +1

    So here’s a thought I’ve had for the past few days.
    To try and prove God with a logic, whether it be through science or any other format is dumbing down the actual existence of God.
    Believing in God is illogical. The Trinity is illogical. The word of God is illogical. However, if the Holy Ghost illuminates the concept of these things to you, they will make perfect sense and that is not something that logic can do..
    Even if logic helps it make sense, there is still a heart and spirit issue .
    This is one reason that God tells us in his word that no one can come to him without the drawing of his spirit.
    That’s all

    • @CrossExamined
      @CrossExamined  4 години тому

      Seems like a very logical way to articulate why you're opposed to using logic to logically conclude that God is illogical.

  • @davidprice9792
    @davidprice9792 4 дні тому +5

    A lot of people ask who created God. I have no answer. And the same is true with who created things to make the Big Bang. So I think I will go with an intelligent being for creation.

    • @sterlingfallsproductions3930
      @sterlingfallsproductions3930 4 дні тому +3

      But why? And also isn't it fair to assume thar humans created God?

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому +2

      @davidprice9792 We have theories and ideas for what created the big bang like earlier heat deaths from earlier big bangs because the big bang is not necessarily the beginning of the universe. But the main thing is when people say something cannot come from nothing, we don't know that to be true and atheists usually don't make that assumption so it wouldn't apply to the bug bang if given by one.

    • @davidprice9792
      @davidprice9792 4 дні тому +1

      @@sterlingfallsproductions3930
      No, that is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. It is impossible for the Big Bang to create what we have. It takes way more faith to believe in the Big Bang theory than it does of Intelligent Design.

    • @davidprice9792
      @davidprice9792 4 дні тому

      @@maxhagenauer24 Like I told the other guy, it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in Intelligent Design.

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

      @davidprice9792 Evolution is a completely different topic but I guess it ties in, but no, if you told the other guy it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe intelligent design, I do not see how that is considering evolution is being observed literally every single day and both micro and macro evolution are accepted as a scientific fact by almost every biologist with the enormous amount of evidence. But ut would take more evidence to believe something that is not anywhere near as easily observed like a God wouldn't it?

  • @fancy3774
    @fancy3774 День тому +1

    math pretty much proves there's an eternal God simply because all numbers comes from an eternal number line that doesn't have a beginning. numbers comes from infinity not ZERO.

  • @festushaggen2563
    @festushaggen2563 4 дні тому +9

    The only reason why someone would want to try to hold the eternal spirit of Almighty God to the laws of physics of matter is to somehow cast doubt on Him or disprove Him.
    As she said, "an atheist who says". Of course.

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому +2

      😂😅🤣 I don't believe in atheists...😊 Merry Christmas brother Festus...

    • @gemguy6812
      @gemguy6812 4 дні тому +1

      @@gi169God doesn’t believe in atheists either.

    • @festushaggen2563
      @festushaggen2563 4 дні тому +2

      @@gi169 As for me, "I'm just lacking evidence" for them. Merry Christmas Gil.

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому

      @@festushaggen2563 🤣😅😂

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +1

      @@festushaggen2563we can’t hold any gods to anything…none are evident to exist. Claiming characteristics or properties, such as “eternal”, are just opinions on a belief among many beliefs.

  • @alpeincameo3723
    @alpeincameo3723 3 дні тому

    Everyone chooses the most advantageous option for themselves, in proportion to their intelligence. This is what is called fate. Fate is not a force that sends misfortune from afar, as is thought.
    A more detailed definition of fate is in the book Flawless Things.

    • @ike8018
      @ike8018 3 дні тому

      Fate is what the only Living God has already known and seen as the lot of all humanity - either in the Book of Life or not.

    • @alpeincameo3723
      @alpeincameo3723 2 дні тому

      @@ike8018 It's a shame why you can't see what God sees.

    • @ike8018
      @ike8018 День тому

      @@alpeincameo3723 so what does God see?

  • @lawrenceeason8007
    @lawrenceeason8007 2 дні тому +1

    God is so “outside the whole set” that it appears it doesn’t even exist. This god is always described in such a way that we cannot detect it…how convenient.
    It’s invisible. It’s outside space and time. It’s so undetectable that we have every reason to disbelieve it.

    • @BobbyFriston
      @BobbyFriston День тому

      Can you provide evidence of the present moment ?

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 День тому

      @@BobbyFristona moment is a concept. Not a thing

    • @BobbyFriston
      @BobbyFriston День тому

      @@lawrenceeason8007
      Can you provide evidence of the present ?

    • @tTtt-ho3tq
      @tTtt-ho3tq День тому

      I think therefore I am, at this moment.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 День тому

      @@BobbyFristonI answered you. A moment, or the present, is a concept not a thing. A moment is not something that actually exists

  • @kensmith8152
    @kensmith8152 3 дні тому

    The only thing I have a problem with is that the Bible says that the wages of sin is death, also that the dead know not anything (Ecclesiastes 9:5)
    1 Thessalonians 4:13 et al says that the dead are asleep and will arise at Christ’s return.
    Neoplatonism is the pagan Greek belief in the immortal soul, but nowhere in the Bible does it say we have an immortal soul!

    • @HeraldKros
      @HeraldKros 3 дні тому +4

      Christ says, that the unrighteous will go to eternal punishment and the righteous will recieve eternal life. This says, that we do have an immortal soul.

    • @kensmith8152
      @kensmith8152 3 дні тому +1

      @: The Bible says only God has immortality! We are given immortality at the resurrection.
      When is the judgment day?
      When Christ returns
      So if God is having people go to heaven or hell when they die, then he’s bypassing the judgment process

  • @jimalafogianis9513
    @jimalafogianis9513 2 дні тому +1

    I appreciate how much you believe and your convictions but it’s all fairytales

  • @imabeast7560
    @imabeast7560 3 дні тому +2

    She confuses enternal vs infinite.

    • @katamas832
      @katamas832 3 дні тому +2

      What's the difference between infinite time and eternal?

    • @imabeast7560
      @imabeast7560 3 дні тому

      @katamas832 eternal has no time. No beginning, no end. Its all things at once always. Infinity can have a beginning but no end. Infinity is a forever continuation.

    • @katamas832
      @katamas832 3 дні тому +1

      @@imabeast7560 "Eternal has no time" then what does it have? Because something can't exist never. That's just not existing. There has to be a continuum for existance to make sense. Especially for cause and effect, such as causing the universe to exist.
      And the "it's all things all at once, always" is using a lot of temporal language for something without time.
      Not quite, infinity is a never ending set. It can never end in either way, it is true it can have a beginning. But it doesn't have to.

  • @dano8613
    @dano8613 4 дні тому +1

    So. Some people will think they are smart and check frank on the closed system comment and reply that we're not one because we get energy from the sun....HOWEVER the sun isn't infinite... that is part of why the 2nd law applies

    • @therick363
      @therick363 4 дні тому +1

      Help me understand your comment better please.
      The earth isn’t a closed system….
      The 2nd law applied to?

    • @dano8613
      @dano8613 4 дні тому

      @therick363 frank mentioned the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
      Most aitheists like to point out that the 2nd law don't apply here because earth isn't a closed system. Frank mentioned this. This is true partially, the earth isn't a closed system because we get our energy from the sun therfore a outside source. However, the fact that our energy source has a limited life span, the 2nd law therfore still applies.
      Look up entropy.
      We also can use this as further evidence for the theory of evolution being not logical or possible. Everything is in a constant state of decay unless influenced by an outside source. Example leave your house sitting locked and empty for a week and you'll come back to dirt and dust everywhere, leave it longer and things will begin breaking down unless your intervention with house keeping and maintenance.
      So using this the people i referenced will say that we are not a closed system so entropy isn't the same because the sun is the outside source of intervention therefore a open system. That's why i mentioned the life span, even the sun is decaying so to speak.
      This is a subject im studying for a seminar for my local church. Its fascinating when you really start digging. Ive had this resistance from numerous people already hence my original comment.

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 4 дні тому

      I think it all boils down to "godidit"..….it doesn't have to make sense....just believe 😂

    • @itsJPhere
      @itsJPhere 3 дні тому

      @@dano8613 Entropy can temporarily decrease in a closed system as long as the entire system ends up in a state of increased entropy. Anyway, the universe isn't a closed system as far as anyone knows, it could be infinitely large.

    • @dano8613
      @dano8613 3 дні тому

      @itsJPhere it can't be infinitely large

  • @maxhagenauer24
    @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому +5

    How can time, space, and matter "come" into existence of there wasn't time for it? Also Einstein's equation showed that the space-time he categorized it has curves infinitely at the singularity but this doesn't necessarily imply a beginning to it.

    • @Disciple793
      @Disciple793 4 дні тому +1

      As human beings it's very difficult to comprehend. If there is a God, He is outside of space, time and matter. It's another dimension. And God fits all the boxes of a personal being who is all powerful and all knowing.

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому +1

      @Disciple793 Ok but clearly it isn't impossible to comprehend if people can comprehend it enough to say those things about it and say God exusts with it. God, if there is one, exists outside of time and soace and matter and sure that has always been easy to comprehend besides the fact it would probably lead to other issues like that he couldn't create if he was. But if God exists in another dimension that isn't time, space, or matter, then he is still inside of something and is being restricted to that dimension. God can fitvthe boxes of being a personal being that is all powerful and knowing but that wouldn't have to do with anything I am saying.

    • @joshredding9588
      @joshredding9588 4 дні тому

      @@maxhagenauer24God speaks of a veil that is between His & our dimensions and that one day that veil will be lifted and we will be with Him in His presence on earth. Also there may not be an equation that proves Gods existence keep that in mind too my friend. I enjoy observing Gods scientific signature on the laws of nature in this mysterious universe

    • @joshredding9588
      @joshredding9588 4 дні тому

      @@maxhagenauer24God also transcends time and space.

    • @joshredding9588
      @joshredding9588 4 дні тому +1

      @@Disciple793time was literally created at the moment it began to exist.

  • @Nyghl0
    @Nyghl0 4 дні тому +1

    Trying to use the everyday common sense you have about the earth today, but about extreme situations such as a singularity is just about as foolish as you can get.
    "What the evidence says" is that common sense pretty much falls apart when studying the actual reality of extreme situations like any beginning of the universe.
    It's enough for people who don't want to think any further, or can't, but all the while scientists have actually been checking, and resisting the temptation to lazily fill in any gaps with "God". Let them cook.

    • @sapphirelane1714
      @sapphirelane1714 4 дні тому

      You do know science began because of man’s pursuit to understand God, right?😂 the irony!

  • @candidcameracat
    @candidcameracat 4 дні тому +1

    What do you say to those who say hell's existence can't be proven?

  • @fs3579
    @fs3579 6 годин тому

    How do you or anyone know what reality is? We don't even know what time is and it exists in our minds. We live in the now and memory is past and imagination is future. They say G-d is everywhere. We may all live in the mind of G-d and that is reality or some other explanation unknown!

  • @michaelsilveradventure5712
    @michaelsilveradventure5712 4 дні тому

    There are two kinds of infinity; countable and uncountable infinity. Countable infinity deals with the numbers such as 1, 2, 3, and so on. Uncountable infinity deals with numbers as as root two, pie, e, and others. There are more of these kind of numbers than the first set…in other words one set is infinitely larger than the other. “How can something be bigger than infinity?” Well it can. God may exist in the realm of the uncountable. Space time may be countable infinity which exists within an uncountable realm. This may be why God can violate the laws of physics or why “with God, all things are possible” can make sense. God can literally see our infinity all at once and manipulate it.

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

      @michaelsilveradventure5712 There is no such thing as a countable infinity. Whole numbers like 1, 2, and 3 are ones you can count but you still cannot count up to infinity with them. What you call uncountable numbers like pi, sqrt(2) and e are really called irrational and sometimes transcendental numbers but you can still count them no differently than whole numbers by saying their names. There are infinitely more irrational and transcendental numbers than whole numbers but that doesn't make one of them countable and another not countable. That is a very strange distinction you made.

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому

      @@maxhagenauer24 All that intelligence will be worthless on Judgment day. Get saved by believing the gospel before it's too late. You are not promised tomorrow.

    • @seanpierce9386
      @seanpierce9386 4 дні тому

      @@maxhagenauer24 It’s a matter of terminology. When you say “infinitely more” it’s actually less rigorous. What we mean by countable is that there is a bijection-a one-to-one correspondence-between any countable set and the natural numbers, by definition.

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

      @seanpierce9386 Yeah it's a matter of terminology because the terminology he used is wrong. "Infinitely more" is less rigorous and better defined, it simply means an infinite amount of numbers more than the numbers of the other set. I do not see how a bijection which is specifically a one to one function correspondence like yiu said would wirk here or what that means. Between any 2 counting set and natural numbers, it is not a bijection bu definition, nor does that have to do with what I said. How can a set itself be a bijection? A countable set of numbers is usually defined in math as a set where each element can be paired with a unique natural number.

    • @seanpierce9386
      @seanpierce9386 4 дні тому

      Also, the OP’s thought doesn’t actually work. There are countably infinitely many aleph_n numbers and you can continue to define even larger infinities, well, infinitely. Cantor himself thought that these infinities exist in the mind of God. After all, they’re just mathematical structures like everything else.

  • @ApatiEktetheimenos
    @ApatiEktetheimenos 4 дні тому

    For those who cannot comprehend the SPIRIT is eternal..... Or, the scratching of itchy ears per 2nd Tim 4:3-4

  • @Jaryism
    @Jaryism 4 дні тому +8

    Love how she has to pull out the phone, and still botches it by saying "YOU SAID an INTERNAL past is impossible..." Internal? Eternal.. yikes. Clearly reciting here.

    • @peregrinesteller
      @peregrinesteller 4 дні тому +2

      Be nice.

    • @katamas832
      @katamas832 3 дні тому +4

      Imagine smack talking someone on a microphone talking in front of hundreds of people reading the wrong word by accident 💀
      There are people with anxiety, to mock them for it is to stand against everything Christ stood for.

  • @ike8018
    @ike8018 3 дні тому

    There's an eternal past because of the only Living God, and God is also the evidence of such.

  • @000FireRainHavoc000
    @000FireRainHavoc000 2 дні тому

    no math doesn't disprove GOD. Cause math is apart reality. It proves design.

  • @itsJPhere
    @itsJPhere 4 дні тому

    What does it mean to be outside of time? If there is no time, how can anything happen? How can a god exist if time doesn't exist? It all seems like special pleading to me, fallacious reasoning..

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +1

      Correct. NOTHING can happen! And yet it DID! Only an ETERNAL being that made a decision to CREATE time itself can account for time itself!

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +1

      @@phoenixgamer1565and how do you know that

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +1

      @@lawrenceeason8007 The eternal being Himself. The "I am" (eternal). God referred to Himself as having no beginning. The Alpha and Omega.

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому +3

      You’re simply
      Underestimating how POWERFUL and almighty God is.. you know why you don’t understand? Because you CANT… humans are not even 0.01% on Gods level of wisdom and understanding.. there is certain things we as humans can never and will never know until the afterlife. And if you think us mortal humans can even understand something as divine as God is you’re massively wrong. We can understand what he has allowed us to and wants us to, anything beyond that is far beyond our capability of understanding.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому

      @@phoenixgamer1565 yes I understand this is your belief

  • @ryngrd1
    @ryngrd1 4 дні тому +11

    Checkmate athiests!!! 😇🙏🕯️🤘🎄👑✝️🔥♾️🙏

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому +3

      Our God is an amazing God... Merry Christmas.

    • @ryngrd1
      @ryngrd1 4 дні тому +4

      @gi169 Christ is born! Merry Christmas! 🎄🙏

    • @T0Mmichael1234
      @T0Mmichael1234 4 дні тому +1

      ​@@ryngrd1
      Glory to God in the Highest
      And to Christ our Saviour

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому

      and exactly how is it a “checkmate”? Please explain

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому

      @lawrenceeason8007
      Watch the video Barbie.

  • @kevinbarbe799
    @kevinbarbe799 2 дні тому

    Turek should really study some subjects before claiming non sense. Entropy can be increasing forever even if there is a finite amount of it. So his argument from entropy is just wrong

  • @msmd3295
    @msmd3295 3 дні тому +1

    Why can’t there be an “infinite” series of material things ? That’s because in any physical universe it is an inherent quality of physicality to have limits, Because physical things are in a constant state of change. Nothing remains the same forever in a material universe.
    And if one believes in a god/creator then a person must reconcile their beliefs with the very nature of the physical universe. Who/What is said to have created Everything ? God. And if god is omniscient then that god should’ve known in advance that creating a universe out of matter there would be no such thing as “eternal life”.
    The notion of eternal life is premised upon human ego, desire, fear (of death), imagination, etc. even though there is NO physical evidence of anything in a material universe lasting forever & forever !! And those who commit themselves to such nonsense are nothing more than cowards to face such fact(s) straight on.

  • @XDRONIN
    @XDRONIN 4 дні тому +2

    @CrossExamined
    1- Time cannot be created because there can never be a moment "Before Time" to create Time, and there is no such a thing as "Outside Time" because Time and Space are not independent of each other, and "Outside" is a Spatial Location
    2- 01:45 Space and Time are correlative, and Not with Matter
    3- Albert Einstein never said that SpaceTime came into existence
    4- Matter is made of Energy, and Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, and Matter is simply a form of Energy. Energy transforms, transfers, and spreads, but it can never cease to exist
    5- The Big Bang theory is the moment the Known Universe began to expand from an Infinite Energy-dense point, it does not mean the moment Timea-Space began to exist or that it "created"
    6- The Total amount of Energy in the Universe today is exactly the same as it was 13.8 Billion years ago when the Known Universe began to expand, and if the Universe continues to exist another 13.8 Billion years from now, the total amount of energy in the Universe will be exactly the same as in its beginning

    • @Timelord888
      @Timelord888 4 дні тому +2

      He said the total amount of USABLE energy

    • @XDRONIN
      @XDRONIN 4 дні тому

      @@Timelord888
      1- That's a NONSENSE because Energy itself in the Universe is not like Oil and Gas which are forms of Energy that exist in limited amounts on the Earth
      2- Everything that exists in the Universe is made of Energy, Planets, Stars, Galaxies, Sound, Heat, etc, it is all forms of Energy, and "USABLE Energy" can only be the amount of Energy that you are capable and intelligent enough to transform and use

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +7

      "5- The Big Bang theory is the moment the Known Universe began to expand from an Infinite Energy-dense point, it does not mean the moment Timea-Space began to exist or that it "created" "
      You atheists are adorable. And where did your magical "Infinitie Energy dense point" come from?
      One day, you will bow your knee and confess that Jesus Christ is God. Whether you do it before your final breath or not is up to you.
      Before = Heaven
      After = Too late and condemnation begins

    • @XDRONIN
      @XDRONIN 4 дні тому

      @@phoenixgamer1565
      1- _You atheists are adorable. And where did your magical "Infinitie Energy dense point" come from?_
      Since Energy itself cannot be created nor destroyed, that means it has always existed, and the Known Universe could be a state of Energy that has transformed and expanded
      2- Jesus is not God nor Messiah, which is why the Jews reject the Christian claims, and FYI; I've come close to death twice already in my life, and in neither I have ever prayed, bowed, nor confessed anything, I doubt a third or final time would be any different

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +1

      @@XDRONIN Energy also began to exist, along with matter, space and time.
      The Jews made a grave mistake and will be separated from God, just like all other sinners that reject Jesus Christ. The end times will have many, many Jews converting to Christianity.
      Upon death, you will confess that Jesus Christ is God. But, it will be too late for salvation.

  • @danielblair4413
    @danielblair4413 4 дні тому +1

    Eternity is defined as being everlasting time, so eternity is in fact time itself.
    Time itself exists due to God's existence, so God didn't even need to create time itself in the first place because it exists due to God's existence.
    When God created the space, matter, and energy of the universe the timeline of the universe that branched off of time itself began.
    God is outside the timeline of the universe but is not outside of time itself which is eternity.

    • @sterlingfallsproductions3930
      @sterlingfallsproductions3930 4 дні тому

      I think that's causes another issue for Christians because then they wonder why did God wait so long to create anything. The universe is insanely old

  • @maxhagenauer24
    @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

    I agree with her, there is no logic of an infinite regression that says defies any logic and I guess you can say it's thought that way mathematically but I wouldn't compare it to that. The other problem though is the reasoning of why there can't be an infinite past, nothing would be traversing through an infinite number of moments to get to the present, that does that mean?

  • @oreally8605
    @oreally8605 4 дні тому +1

    Mathematicians lol Yeah they sure can out wit God lol. Uhhh NO.

    • @Chazd1949
      @Chazd1949 4 дні тому +4

      I don't think it's the mathematicians who try to outwit God, it's the atheists who don't understand all that much about mathematics. In mathematics, infinite is merely a concept, not a representation of reality. Mathematicians all recognize this.

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому +2

      @@oreally8605
      Merry Christmas my brother...

    • @mattr.1887
      @mattr.1887 4 дні тому

      Maybe there's a difference between God and Christianity.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому

      @@Chazd1949what part of what you said here is in any way a challenge to atheists regarding mathematics?

  • @kevinwesterville2115
    @kevinwesterville2115 4 дні тому +1

    Gandalf’s staff is even more powerful.

    • @albaraka7519
      @albaraka7519 4 дні тому +1

      YOU SHALL NOT PASS!!! Hehe.

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 4 дні тому

      Said Mrs gandalf....

  • @cmdrseljdon
    @cmdrseljdon 4 дні тому

    @CrossExamined Light is eternal has no beginning (Light emits from The Elohim), Time is eternal because Proverbs wisdom (who is The Messiah) says, "There was never a time that I was not at his side" which disagrees with your assessment that time is created. Time being existent as eternity does not mean that it has power over The Elohim. Elohim is not limited by Time yet has perfect control over it. I would dare say that Time emits from them just as light does.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому

      Well that is a claim

    • @Nickleotide
      @Nickleotide 3 дні тому

      Light also comes from a lamp or star or lava or bioluminescent organisms...

    • @cmdrseljdon
      @cmdrseljdon 3 дні тому

      @Nickleotide lol, doesnt mean it hasnt existed beyond eternity.

    • @Nickleotide
      @Nickleotide 3 дні тому

      Did you get that from a science paper?

    • @cmdrseljdon
      @cmdrseljdon 3 дні тому

      @@Nickleotide the Bible

  • @MuhammadUsmanJefferson
    @MuhammadUsmanJefferson 4 дні тому +9

    This 2024 I no longer depend on the government or salary to survive. "Of course, trading is a safer way to make more money now because I have made up to 352,000 thousand US dollars recently. Work will only pay your bills, business will make you earn." You are rich, but trading makes and keeps you rich, the future is inevitable...

    • @oreally8605
      @oreally8605 4 дні тому +1

      No ads please

    • @JeffersonBrooklynFrancisco
      @JeffersonBrooklynFrancisco 4 дні тому

      How
      ..? Am a newbie in crypto investment, please can you guide me through on how you made profit?

    • @anastasMariaMorgan
      @anastasMariaMorgan 4 дні тому

      Thanks to Mr Martin Jossy

    • @anastasMariaMorgan
      @anastasMariaMorgan 4 дні тому

      he's a licensed broker here in the states

    • @anastasMariaMorgan
      @anastasMariaMorgan 4 дні тому

      After I raised more than 325k trading with him I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.

  • @AENDT
    @AENDT 4 дні тому +2

    How did Turek pass any school with his poor knowledge of maths?

  • @quantumreality8844
    @quantumreality8844 4 дні тому +2

    Matter and energy are eternal prove me wrong

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому

      Mark of the beast is coming. Be careful what you wish for. Your proof is going to be served on a silver platter and it won't be pretty.

    • @olivieryeung398
      @olivieryeung398 4 дні тому +1

      Irrelevant, he's talking about usability not potential

  • @kathierouse6046
    @kathierouse6046 4 дні тому +3

    NO MORE SCAMS!!!! KNOCK IT OFF!!!!!!

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому +3

      Everything evolved from earth diarrea! You’re so right 😂🤦🏽‍♂️

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 4 дні тому

      Even that lame comment is better than the verbal diarrhoea quoted in the bible.

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 3 дні тому

      @@ARRAM57 you will answer to God FACE TO FACE for that disrespect and blasphemy, I’d repent and start actin right while you still have the chance. I got NOTHING to lose if I’m wrong (I’m not) you have EVERYTHING to lose. Good luck

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 3 дні тому

      Joelercoaster+
      Your first post shows you are uneducated in science with your childish comment. Your second post shows a lack of understanding of the real world and history. There is not a choice between only your god and disbelief. There are thousands of gods YOU could be wrong about. .... good luck . The Egyptians ,Greeks and Norse believed with all their being they were choosing the correct god.... Just like you.

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 3 дні тому

      Your first post shows you are uneducated in science with your childish comment. Your second post shows a lack of understanding of the real world and history. There is not a choice between only your god and disbelief. There are thousands of gods YOU could be wrong about. .... good luck . The Egyptians ,Greeks and Norse believed with all their being they were choosing the correct god.... Just like you.

  • @paulhadlington8179
    @paulhadlington8179 4 дні тому +2

    Because evidence suggests that the Universe had a beginning and could not have come from nothing, religious doctrine fills this unknown factor with a creator god. The assumption being that their eternal god created the universe out of nothing. This is a classic case of the fallacy "god of the gaps". In truth the universe did not come from nothing, although how it came into being we don't know and maybe never will.

    • @somerandom3247
      @somerandom3247 4 дні тому +1

      I think a big problem theists have Is they are confusing the universe beginning to expand, with it beginning to exist.

    • @charlieassaf6361
      @charlieassaf6361 4 дні тому +1

      Jesus rose from the dead. 500 eye witness accounts, historians place a 75-80% chance that this happened. After his resurrection, the whole afterflow effect begins of the 'god fills the gaps' and it all makes sense. Yet to be disproved of any points. Evidence points towards Jesus was likely real, gospels are relatively accurate and from an evidence based perspective, god creating the universe can be derived. In my opinion it takes a lot more faith to believe atoms and chemical processes formed the universe. That's just my two cents thougy

    • @somerandom3247
      @somerandom3247 4 дні тому

      @charlieassaf6361
      What evidence do you have for Jesus rising from the dead?
      You don't have 500 eye witness accounts. You have one anonymous account that claims 500 people witnessed Jesus after his death.
      That % is made up and you know it.

  • @lawrenceeason8007
    @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +1

    The difference is one is a natural explanation and the other is magical.
    Given that every single time we have investigated how our world works it ends up a natural, reasonable explanation, I would go with the former. It is not necessary to reach for unfounded, undemonstrable explanations of magic/supernature

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому +1

      There’s nothing more “magical” than everything coming from nothing… that’s not even magical that’s just delusional and objectively logically impossible.

    • @SpiritFilledDisciple
      @SpiritFilledDisciple 4 дні тому +2

      Can you give a natural explanation for consciousness? How are you able to reason, think, feel guilt, happiness, or shame?

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +1

      @ well, we know that consciousness…thoughts, emotions…come from physical brains

    • @therick363
      @therick363 4 дні тому

      @@joelercoasterwho’s saying from nothing?

    • @bigboymustard230
      @bigboymustard230 4 дні тому +2

      ​@@lawrenceeason8007 i hope you know we have tryed to map out consciousness and we have found absouletly no place where this occurs and also where unifed experience comes also quantum theory shows that particle colapse are messurement dependent also this says any type of mesurment but you need to acount to the fact that the messuring material is made of particles so they depend on colapse too so consciousness makes messuremnt things that make messuremnts just look it up im not joking at all

  • @sunsetman1479
    @sunsetman1479 3 дні тому +2

    this man makes up stuff likes he knows god personally. nobody understands what he says.

    • @kimvardy2260
      @kimvardy2260 3 дні тому +1

      We do know God personally. We have a one on one relationship with Jesus christ

    • @FaithfullyFishingForFacts
      @FaithfullyFishingForFacts 3 дні тому

      No YOU don’t understand what he says 😂

  • @macmac1022
    @macmac1022 4 дні тому +2

    #1 Are morals objective?
    #2 Are there objective moral duties?
    #3 Is it immoral not to do an objective moral duty?
    #4 Does god do the objective moral duties?
    #5 Is it an objective moral duty to save a drowning person if you are of sound mind and can do it with no risk to yourself?
    #6 Would it be objectively immoral to punish someone for a crime they did not commit?
    #7 Would you consider a parent who put their kids in a room with a poison fruit and told the kids not to eat it but then also put the best con artist in the room with the children knowing the con artist will get the kids to eat the fruit and the parent does nothing to stop it an objectively moral parent?

    • @festushaggen2563
      @festushaggen2563 4 дні тому +8

      @macmac1022 Still liking your own comments I see. Well, I guess someone should. Don't worry. It'll be our little secret. 🤫

    • @macmac1022
      @macmac1022 4 дні тому +1

      @@festushaggen2563 ROFLMAO I did not like it though, I never do, its my own comment. Is that the holy spirit getting things wrong again? LOL

    • @TomMichael5678
      @TomMichael5678 4 дні тому +4

      ​@@festushaggen2563
      Hey Fess, maybe that's Bonesy in a another troll account 😂...

    • @festushaggen2563
      @festushaggen2563 4 дні тому +3

      @macmac1022 Like I said, it's our secret. 😉👉🏻 Don't worry about Tom. He won't tell anyone either

    • @gi169
      @gi169 4 дні тому +4

      Troll...🧌🧌🧌🧌
      🤣😅😂

  • @joelercoaster
    @joelercoaster 4 дні тому +2

    Math proves God 1+0=1
    0+0 does not = 1
    Atheism defies the logic of basic math, they would need 0+0 (nothing) to somehow become 1 (something) it is mathematically impossible. There must have always been something. If there was ever “nothing” there would never be something.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +2

      My goodness that doesn’t prove a god at all

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому

      @@lawrenceeason8007 yes it does, burden of proof is on you to showcase how 0 can magically turn into 1… I’ll be waiting. Logic is not on your side if you try to refute 0+0 always equaling 0.. the burden of proof is on YOU to prove that it can equal 1, not for everyone else to denounce their basic logic of simple math to believe in your fairytale of nothing magically creating everything. Atheism defies basic math. And common sense. You, like the whole public school system have simply been deceived.

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому

      @@joelercoaster mathematics is a language of numbers. Doesn’t have anything to do with gods. You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому

      @@lawrenceeason8007 this is about logic, using math as an analogy about the beginning, what is considered “nothing” in mathematics is 0… so atheist since they don’t believe in an intelligent creator creating everything, have to believe in NO creator creating everything, and because the scientific consensus is that the universe has a beginning, that means you have to believe in nothing turning into everything, which is illogical and again defies basic math. 0+0 can never and will never be able to equal 1, comprehend the analogy and try to give a good answer. I’ll wait lol you never will. It’s irrefutable because you know 0+0 can never equal anything other than 0 analogically meaning… nothing would always be nothing.. not randomly magically start turning into something.

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

      @joelercoaster That is not what atheism claims, atheism is just the lack of belief in a god. Even if it was, math 0 + 0 = 1 does not relate because we are not adding 0 things to 0 things to get 1 thing in that sense, that's not even what is meant by something from nothing. And if it was then if God did bot come from anything then isn't he an example of 0 + 0 = 1 by your logic?

  • @DM-dk7js
    @DM-dk7js 4 дні тому +1

    The eternality of god is not a given, to begin with. Let alone something needing disproving.

    • @schlauchmeister234
      @schlauchmeister234 3 дні тому

      Frank, as other Christian philosophers, doesn't say God's externality is a "given", it's a logical deduction.

    • @DM-dk7js
      @DM-dk7js 3 дні тому

      @@schlauchmeister234 logical…how? What’s reasonable or logical about granting premises that are substantively equivalent to mayonnaise?

    • @schlauchmeister234
      @schlauchmeister234 3 дні тому

      @@DM-dk7js What "premises"? God's externality? Again, it's not just "granted", it's a logical deduction. You know what "deduction" is, right? It's not assuming or just granting.

    • @DM-dk7js
      @DM-dk7js 3 дні тому

      @@schlauchmeister234 and how was such a thing possibly deduced?

    • @schlauchmeister234
      @schlauchmeister234 2 дні тому

      @@DM-dk7js "and how was such a thing possibly deduced?" - Simple. If spacetime had a point where it began to exist, then its cause must exist independently of spacetime.

  • @TheContrarian32
    @TheContrarian32 4 дні тому +3

    Whether math disproves the construct of eternity isn’t really the point. Maybe it does maybe it doesn’t. Ultimately it is those who claim God is eternal to demonstrate the proposition true.

    • @docequis9796
      @docequis9796 4 дні тому +8

      Math has already proven something cannot come from nothing.

    • @TheContrarian32
      @TheContrarian32 4 дні тому +4

      @@docequis9796
      Only creation via God is ex nihilo,so I guess that disproves the creation concept?

    • @maxhagenauer24
      @maxhagenauer24 4 дні тому

      ​@docequis9796 In what way gmhas it demonstrated that and what do you mean by something coming from nothing?

    • @docequis9796
      @docequis9796 4 дні тому +1

      @TheContrarian32 God does not exist in this universe He created from another realm... we know that scientifically because something cannot be created from nothing in this Universe unless something from outside our universe created it... We call that being God, you might say he is a green alien from another universe but that is up to you to prove what the Creator is like and what he wants... the Chruch of Scientology is for you if you like aliens. God sent His Son who could embody's Him in this universe.

    • @Cookie-op6kc
      @Cookie-op6kc 4 дні тому

      @@docequis9796math has proven something CAN come from nothing. For example: 1,2,3,4,5,6 and you can go on and on right? But now backwards: 6,5,4,3,2,1. What comes before 1? Nothing essentially. Likewise, there was nothing before god either.

  • @hhh-et2vi
    @hhh-et2vi 4 дні тому +1

    It's quite sad that christians follow con artists like Frank, Is there anything that man doesn't claim to know about god or the afterlife.

  • @AENDT
    @AENDT 4 дні тому +2

    Just hot air by an arrogant guy.

    • @saints2superbowl757
      @saints2superbowl757 4 дні тому +4

      Alright, the floor is yours... go ahead...

    • @elnino150
      @elnino150 4 дні тому +4

      Let’s hear it we are waiting

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +2

      Yes, you are full of hot air. But, we already know that.

  • @Cassander314
    @Cassander314 2 дні тому

    No.

  • @JamesWatson-h4h
    @JamesWatson-h4h 4 дні тому +7

    But you have never proven your god to be real franky boy. It's just a concept. And abstract. Not concrete.

    • @T0Mmichael1234
      @T0Mmichael1234 4 дні тому

      Hey Bonesy, how's your folks doin, Kiddo?

    • @Nyghl0
      @Nyghl0 4 дні тому +2

      "In the abstract, He's concrete" is basically as far as any theist has ever been able to progress.

    • @phoenixgamer1565
      @phoenixgamer1565 4 дні тому +1

      Jesus proved it Himself. Don't worry, He will tell you all about it one day, upon your final breath in fact...

    • @lawrenceeason8007
      @lawrenceeason8007 4 дні тому +3

      @@phoenixgamer1565because you believe the story in a book?

    • @joelercoaster
      @joelercoaster 4 дні тому

      There’s more manuscripts of New Testament then any writing in history. You’re very ignorant, research more before confidently spewing nonsense

  • @Cassander314
    @Cassander314 2 дні тому +1

    Stop lying.

    • @charliegarnett9757
      @charliegarnett9757 15 годин тому

      About what?

    • @Cassander314
      @Cassander314 12 годин тому

      @ about “God” being the grand, eternal tyrant of heaven that is perpetually judging us and determining whether or not we should be punished; that’s the fictional character “satan” that you’re worshipping. Don’t believe me? Look at the origin of these beliefs in relation to world war 2 ending.

    • @Cassander314
      @Cassander314 12 годин тому

      @ the synagogue of Satan instilled these beliefs in the churches.

  • @sukruoosten
    @sukruoosten День тому

    ONLY GOD YAH IS ETERNAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    no other creature matter ore even time