He def deserved a new trial today just for ineffective counsel bc this is horrendous and you could tell that he never asks the right questions when he redirects his client smh
@@citrusbloom7504 the judge addressed what? How could anyone look at his attorney and say yes, effective. I'm not saying they need to win, but they do need to be effective and have a fighting chance. He lit sat there when he should've been objecting, redirecting in a way where you rehab your clients image, etc etc. That lawyer did no such thing. If it were your life on the line, I'm sure you'd think diff.
T DRIT Agreed. I hope he appeals. There are so many facts that make it look unlikely he killed her. He really needed a better lawyer. His lawyer made some points but he's so low key it was hard to catch them. I still wonder if he stabbed her with the corn rake, why didn't she scream? The son would have heard it. The prosecutor tries to make it seem unlikely anyone else attacked her because they would have heard something, including her scream, but she's totally overlooking that if thats true, then if he had attacked her the son could have heard it. However, if she fell on it she might not have cried out, just tried to get out of the red shed to get help, which is why she was in the position she was in.
Both the defense and prosecution kept talking about did the son see his father the entire time they were in the hog barn working. But whatever happened to her happened within minutes of her leaving the hog barn. NO one said the defendant followed her out of the hog barn and walked with her or right behind her to the red shed. I think accident, some people think another person killed her. ( maybe tracking her with cell phone app ? ) I do not understand how the jury found him guilty .
@@tracyd693 , I feel the same way I any guy that would let his wife be gone for 30 days staying with her uncle and he taken care of the kids in the farm in that I feel he is not in that he is not guilty
The defense stipulated prior to trial that she was indeed murdered. Just that Todd didn’t do it. They abandoned the accidental fall strategy when autopsy revealed 6 holes in her back.
@@ronque23 You are correct. I really think they shouldn't have abandoned the idea of an accident though. As another commentor points out, if she was that dizzy, and fell on that fork, she could have tried to get up off it, and somehow reinjured herself. Unlikely, yet not impossible. They should have left that door open. Pretty lousy defense in my opinion. Now he sits in Fort Madison...
DONALD1951 the point is the big picture. The prosecutor is describing in great detail him finding his wife that day and him handling her body, every detail of that ordeal and he has absolutely no emotion. If he was innocent he would barely be able to think about that let alone talk about it play by play. I think this speaks volumes to his guilt
Exactly. I really believe if they did a separate autopsy they would find it was an accident, and the different marks was her trying to remove it to get out of the barn to get help.
Laura, she’s not standing because it’s not allowed in many districts. Why? Because when lawyers stand and strut with boom voice they’re actually controlling the room. It’s dramatic but it also “threatens” many witnesses because it intimidates them. Standing is a power position if the subject (witness) is sitting. A lot of truth in this theory but it’s not as interesting or fun to watch, that’s for sure.
Not guilty imo !!! The prosecutor has not proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt imo!!! The prosecutors voice is so annoying and overbearing!!! Lol 😂
@@stevencharles4074 I agree with you. She is annoying. Too loud ,too fast and makes me agitated . She does sound automated.She wants to get it all out there b4 they object ...
jeeezus ... wtf is this prosecutor doing .. getting away with this 'line' of questioning. It's ridiculous. His defense lawyer should've been objecting every 2 seconds.
The rake had a broken handle, so i'm thinking it was just the right height for her to back into, freak out, and then fall back on the rack a 2nd time. Didn't realize that the handle was broken till just now, so I'm thinking there is plausibility here.
@@InLieuTube lol, no conspiracy theorist here. as it relates to this particular case, you will see 99% of my comments having him guilty as sin. So yea, there goes any need for a "damper". I was looking for any hint of a plausible reason for the disappearance of a corn-rake into the back of a spousal floosey.
Me imitating the prosecutor (at about 180 words per minute): when you put one foot in front of the other, which foot goes first, which toe hits the ground first? When you inhale, do the hairs in your left nostril move to the left or to the right and at what angle?" OMG. KMN. I am so glad I am not the court reporter typing this!
She missed a big moment when she didn't say "that's a lie, right" when he neglected (on purpose) to mention Jerry's affair with Amy. She skimmed right to what happened between Amy and Jerry instead of nailing him with the lie. An opportunity that I rarely see a prosecutor miss, except here.
IF IT SO HAPPENS!! UGH! I WAS LOOKING AROUND FOR A CORN RAKE TOO! Can't get over 12 jurors bought all her crazy lies. Most female prosecutors with this attitude turn off a jury. I know I couldn't listen!! Thanks for the laugh!! Valium...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@raigenhuss7030 The story of her death was a bit unbelievable. She had wounds as though she was hit once with the rake and it doesnt go deep enough so someone did it again. Inconsistent with falling on the rake.
I don’t think he’s guilty. I think he got railroaded. How could a detective think it’s ok not to check fingernails because they think they have their suspect? That’s the most ignorant approach to law enforcement I’ve ever seen.
@Joyce Nesselhauf it was concluded Amy had been murdered and didn't have an accident (even by Todd's attorney). If Todd or the kids didn't do this, who did? Perhaps it was the same person who murdered OJ and Ronald Goldman.
Why didn't Amy yell for help? Whether she fell or was being attacked by Todd, she could have yelled for Tristan. Wouldn't she have screamed in pain, even if she fell?
Nancy Rose they said the other barn they were in was as big as a football field. I think it’s possible it happened when Trystan was the farthest away and couldn’t hear. ? Who knows?!
People rarely yell when they are stabbed in the back. It’s like drowning you expect it to be a wild scene but it’s usually a silent death. There was only a few drops of blood it all probably pooled within her body
Nobody really knows what Tristan may have actually heard. Hes clearly about protecting his dad. I dont judge him for that. Its a horrible place for a kid to be abd natural tendency.
Investigators never looked into anyone else! They need to look into the boyfriend and his wife amongst others. This case should be dismissed just based on the investigation alone.
There was NO ONE else on the farm. Period. There also was NO ONE with a motive either. (Other than yours truly sitting on the witness stand). Also you are clearly missing the point. IF someone wanted to murder her (which their was no one) how did they do it in the short time she went from the barn to the shed to get the pet carrier AND EVEN MORE importantly, how did they know she would be going into the shed at that exact moment??? Thats why jurors have to be logical and depict whats "reasonable". (For the record, the boyfriend & his wife were looked into. They had nothing to do with it).
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is h
Since when would that pet carrier weigh over 10 lbs. This trial is a travesty ! This guy deserves a new trial with real lawyers and an intelligent jury! Actually he never should have been arrested!
Agreed! That pet carrier def doesn't weigh more than 10lbs I have 2 of those and can carry one on each hand with my painful arthritic hands, they are big, bulky but not heavy
I notice that he seems passively annoyed with the prosecutor during his cross examination. I think he has the potential to become violent.....that mug shot, wow!
As part of EACH question, reviewing info already discussed IS NOT "leading". Believe me, no prosecutor is going to "lead" a defendant. Thats why there are no objections from his attorneys. Now a defense attorney may "lead" (at least try to) their client.
@@christinabutler7142 you know it girl!! I pay attention to EVERYTHING. I also use common sense, not emotion like some of these other clowns. Thanks girl, you made my day!!😅😂🤣
She really needs to stop with the drama and over emphasizing words he may or may not have said. She sounds like a dope when she is dramatically speaking
I noticed her condesending tone too. The valley girl "soooo" made me what to send her to her room. She basically appears to be testifying and not asking questions.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is he
@@gmsgms3638 There are four tines on the corn rake and she had 6 plus wounds on her. If she fell on it there would be no more than four poke holes from the rake. If she was attacked with it someone stabbed her more than once. I guess they figure she would only fall on it once haha.
Prosecutor is clutching at straws..... Really don't think he killed his wife... I think this wasn't investigated properly from the start.... Corn rake - DNA Finger nails DNA I also think other people could of a reason to harm her... Ex lover or their wives.... Even the son... Possibly... He does seem ruffled during cross examination... Ummmm
Implausible that a man who had been farming his whole life would leave a very sharp rake face-up on the ground. That along with the internet searches about killing a cheating wife is pretty damning.
Yup and he said "the rake has been all over the property" when it's been broken since 2012? But then he said the rake was in the shed since 2012. He can't stop lying and changing stories.
He has had a year to grieve and calm down. If he was crying people wouldn't believe him either. I still think he is doing a great job. He may or may not be guilty. I hope he's innocent, but I don't think anyone will ever know. With the Moorer couple, I had no doubt they were guilty.
Let's assume he didn't kill his wife. Since her death, he's learned that she was again having a serious affair, was secretly moving furniture and other assets to her brother's, and planning to divorce him and take his farm and the kids. I wouldn't expect him to be too sad after learning all of that.
Karen Lombardi She wasn't just killed. A year has passed & he's had numerous people asking him questions so he's had to go over all this many times by now.
This prosecutor is hell-bent to get him ! I still say this was a freak accident..... :( She harps on Amy's dizziness but, Amy had already had plans to go shopping with a child in her car to get boots. He told her he would get the carrier if she couldn't do it. He and Trysten both told her to go back to the house !
Shannon Warren Sure you could if you rolled onto all fours trying to get help...they're also making a big deal out of a simple dnc ...4 days later u would be fine...unless she developed an infection . All of this is hard to believe...the idiocy in this trial is unreal....I hope he gets another trial and not 20 years down the road. He needs to appeal and be released on bond! This woman led a double life...god knows who may have been after her ...the last e mails to the bf .he was being rude and short with her and she still kept at it....troubled woman for sure.
Susan Agreed. Any of us who have lived on a farm have seen many strange accidents. If she fell, she could have hit her face, fell on the rake, tried to get up & fell back again. Landing on the tines would have flipped up the handle which would in turn hit something changing the position of the rake. Many of us on farms have had a rake take on a life of its own. If you're not familiar with these things it might seem strange but its really true. Also, she was in a position & location that someone trying to crawl out to get help would be in. If the prosecutor thinks it couldn't have been anyone else who could have killed her because he would have heard them, then why wouldn't that apply if he killed her? The son would have heard something. If she was attacked she likely would have cried out but no one heard her cry out. However, she might not have cried out if she fell.
If it is murder, seems difficult to think it would be anyone other than Todd. As an aside, I am starting to feel like sticking a cornrake in the prosecutor.
Cannot stand the prosecutor! Even when she is mistaking, she quickly says "And..." followed by another rushed question as if all she wants is to interrupt him and scare him by talking super fast. This could backfire big time on the State. We just saw this happening in the Skylar Richardson case.
On my neighbors farm last year he was on a step ladder trying to reach a wire to a light, fell and his hand knocked some tools off one being a hoe, as he landed on the ground his head hit the hoe and cut half his ear off and cut a nice gash in his head. Amy was dizzy several times the day she died. It's not too far fetched to think she may have fallen on the corn rake and rolled over trying to crawl outside. He could have killed her. It could have been an accident. And yes it could have been someone prowling around on the property. Happens all the time.
Forensics doesn't lie and forensics says it's murder. Most women (or men) are murdered by their spouse or ex spouse. It's pretty rare to be murdered by someone else.
Prosecutor does NOT understand how google or gmail works. She has no idea that all devices you login to will show all searches on every device. They did NOT show the by device id for these searches. I suspect request to google does not even asked google for specific device they requested requested by email. I can login to my email on any device and my searches will show.
I dont know why she thinks a flip phone can't have internet access. A friend of mine has a flip phone and it does everything my smartphone does. Granted the screen is quite small, but internet searching can be done all day, every day on it.
All I know is, if I were on the witness stand and this prosecutor was asking me these questions in the same snarky, sarcastic and arrogant tone, she’d be going in for a full set of dental implants and I’d be going off to jail. Oh well, glad I’m not in his shoes. She is moderately annoying to listen to though.
Amen! She seems very unhappy, and argumentative... NOT professional At ALL. I see her more in a position at the DMV. She could fight with people all day long there....
And your reaction is the EXACT reaction they want you to have! Not only proves how quickly you can become angered, but proves you just might be unstable. It wouldn't be a good look to a jury evaluating you.
@@notthatnikinicole1015 actually shes genius at this style of questioning. Not only does she NOT appear "unhappy", she has just the right mix of sarcasm & being condescending and she delivers it in such an effortlessly calm tone, HE is too dumb to even pick up on it.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is he
She leads the witness into an answer. For example, "She came home but she was probably tired, right?" This leads the person being questioned to answer yes. As opposed to "Was she tired when she came home?"
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is he
It sounded like he was counting out while administering CPR... 1...2...3...4... Sure, when you are looking for anything, in order to blame someone, to be able to point the finger and be angry at your whole life... Instead of SERIOUSLY doing all of the foot work... Leaving no stone unturned... You can make muffled, stressed, full of anxiety whisper sound "four" into " whore"
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is he
Farmer Mullis is a liar, E-I-E-I-O. Bam! Slam dunk for the prosecution. This man is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. I hope the jury bring their common sense to deliberations.
...made me laugh! A welcom respote from processing the depths and breadth of emotions , violence , traumas , and Losses connected with the events that’ve brought this case to trial.
Definition of reasonable doubt by the courts...“It is not required that the government prove guilt beyond all possible doubt. The test is one of reasonable doubt. A reasonable doubt is a doubt based on reason and common sense - the kind of doubt that would make a reasonable person hesitate to act. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt must, therefore, be proof of such a convincing character that a reasonable person would not hesitate to rely and act upon it in the most important of his own affairs. The jury will remember that a defendant is never to be convicted on mere suspicion and conjecture.”
He has had a year to grieve and calm down. If he was crying people wouldn't believe him either. I still think he is doing a great job. He may or may not be guilty. I hope he's innocent, but I don't think anyone will ever know. With the Moorer couple, I had no doubt they were guilty.
Sue Ann Natter, he is very handsome imo. Amy probably thought she had made a great catch. Their children are probably good looking too. I think her problem was she wasn't being sexually satisfied. The son said he sleeps in the living room because he has back trouble. It wasn't nice of her to cheat. It wasn't good that he was watching porn either.
The uterus is an organ wth is she nuts? If i had to explain to a young kid that procedure id search for a diagram of the female human body with its organs.
@Charles H Geis IV I believe he's innocent to I believe he was set up but also the guy that was that was messing around with his wife they should do something to him cuz I feel Todd was trying to get his met marriage back on track and that guy was interfering with it they should get some kind of jail time to!
It's my understanding than when someone is lying, they look up and to the left. When he's talking about where the rake is prior to the incident he's doing exactly that. Whatever the truth is, may justice be served here. Men, and ladies; when you take a vow, make sure you stand to preserve it!
Cerulean c No, whether a person looks up & to the left or right depends on which hemisphere in their brain is dominant. It's also connected to handedness. He's right handed so likely the left hemisphere in his brain is more dominant so he would look up & to the left when he has to think about something. He had to search his memory to remember the location of the rake so that question would cause him to look up & to the left. It doesn't happen if a person is asked something they can easily remember & don't have to search their memory for.
Cerulean c I understand. His looking up/left only indicates thinking about something so it could very well be his answer wasn't honest. We just can't tell that for sure about eye movement.
I have never fallen on a on a corn rake before... I did however step on one and the handle smashed me in the face and knocked me out. A few hour later I came to and stepped on the same rake again. I filed a lawsuit against the rake.
Why she sounds like she’s really emotionally invested in this case and is taking it personal. The way she says murder over and over and her uppity attitude comes across as so unprofessional. Why can’t she ask questions without being so hostile.
I have thought the same thing but if I mention it in a group, I am attacked. But I cleaned up the audio a bit. It's amazing what he really says....and Todd is speaking to Trysten.
@@lorimoore5182 I have 2 sons, its not like it hasn't happened before..I mean look at what the Menendez brothers did to their mother. I dont give a crap if people like what I say.. we are all entitled to our own opinions. He just sounded so cold.and if I was dead and my.ex put my dead body on one of my boys while he drove to the hospital.. my kids would have jumped out the window.screaming and crying and then sought therapy for a good 20 to 30 years...
Can't believe how many actually believe a guy is not guilty, as soon as he looses some fat, looks ok and doesn't scream profanities. There is not much of a defense. Nobody was there except him and the kids, as he admitted. The searches show how he planned the murder for a while and desperately looked for the best "accident". Obviously he had hoped to get her in one blow from the back, but she heard something and moved, so he had to do more. And I read here how she "set him up" to be a suspect for her murder... Lol people. She couldn't stab herself 2 or three times in the back with that fork and then land on her hands and knees - and beat herself up first. And no she didn't deserve it just because she cheated on that control freak. Women are not posession of their husbands.
He'd have to be awfully stupid to be researching something he planned on carrying out since everyone knows it would be easy to find out he did that on his computer. His farm seemed fairly sophisticated to operate, & he owned more than 1 farm, so he can't be a stupid man.
@@carolatkinson3868 Trysten like Todd would have had to leave immediately after Amy in order to have killed her. Trysten testified that Todd and himself were working in the barn immediately after Amy left.
No!!! Son didn't do it. She might ran into something else B4 rake. We have several barns nothing but sharp tools and equipment everywhere. Full of work tools.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples. Warning Against Adultery 20 My son, keep your father’s command and do not forsake your mother’s teaching. 21 Bind them always on your heart; fasten them around your neck. 22 When you walk, they will guide you; when you sleep, they will watch over you; when you awake, they will speak to you. 23 For this command is a lamp, this teaching is a light, and correction and instruction are the way to life, 24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife, from the smooth talk of a wayward woman. 25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes. 26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread, but another man’s wife preys on your very life. 27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? 28 Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? 29 So is he
I don’t believe he killed her. Accidents happen doing farm work. I know a man that cut his arm off. That attorney is hooked up on the phone and lap tap.
Human greed he did not want to lose half his farm so instead decided to kill his cheating wife and the worst part is that he let his young son find her after he killed her,an image he would have to live with for the rest of his life,well in the end he lost everything,I hope the jury’s see through his lies and put him where he belongs for the kids and her family I pray for them.
The police/detectives went to the farm with his young son, while Todd went to the hospital with his wife. Who knows what could have happened in his absence, you know, with the cameras?
Maybe she got off it then passed out and fell back onto it. What's annoying is that crazy things can happen. Maybe this is one case in a million or more where she really did die accidentally, but we'll never know for sure because there were no witnesses.
@@noaheinstein2369 no we spell it crick just like it sounds.. Its a country thing ... We all know (well I do at least) know that's not how its pronounced or spelled but thats how we say it and spell it.... Now I'm wondering if people around here are dumb enough to actually think that's what its called and thats how it's really spelled.... Lol
I love how prosecutor is breaking Todd's story down step by step... Leading him up to that moment where he whispers "die whore" .... His eyes darted over to his attorney..... He heard it and knew everyone else did too! Great job prosecutor! As for not hearing Amy scream, she had the wind knocked out of her. Can't scream.
Those internet searches are pretty damning. The prosecutor may be annoying but she is methodically hitting her marks. She annunciates well and uses that tone perfectly. Her questions with timed subtle sarcasm and doubt. Excellent job. I believe he will be found guilty.
Is his lawyer a public defender he must think this case is a lost cause or he thinks his client is guilty he dosnt defend him much he's left on his own hardly heard any objections
Did his attorney sleep throughout this cross examination?
I know, listening to this cross examination is torture.
@Jeanne McCarthy 😆😆😆😆
He def deserved a new trial today just for ineffective counsel bc this is horrendous and you could tell that he never asks the right questions when he redirects his client smh
@@csea4672 : The judge addressed that, nope.
@@citrusbloom7504 the judge addressed what? How could anyone look at his attorney and say yes, effective. I'm not saying they need to win, but they do need to be effective and have a fighting chance. He lit sat there when he should've been objecting, redirecting in a way where you rehab your clients image, etc etc. That lawyer did no such thing. If it were your life on the line, I'm sure you'd think diff.
This prosecutor is annoying!
Omg I can't stand it....
She is lipstick on a Pig!.. Literally
she is sooo freaking annoying
So effin annoying
Not articulate at all. Her delivery is terrible
I keep coming back to this, and I do not understand what the juries where thinking, because the state did not prove their case at all.
T DRIT Agreed. I hope he appeals. There are so many facts that make it look unlikely he killed her. He really needed a better lawyer. His lawyer made some points but he's so low key it was hard to catch them. I still wonder if he stabbed her with the corn rake, why didn't she scream? The son would have heard it. The prosecutor tries to make it seem unlikely anyone else attacked her because they would have heard something, including her scream, but she's totally overlooking that if thats true, then if he had attacked her the son could have heard it. However, if she fell on it she might not have cried out, just tried to get out of the red shed to get help, which is why she was in the position she was in.
Did she fall on it twice? Friends of hers have told me that he is a mean man.
Oh come on hes just good at fooling you. He is beyond guilty.
Both the defense and prosecution kept talking about did the son see his father the entire time they were in the hog barn working. But whatever happened to her happened within minutes of her leaving the hog barn. NO one said the defendant followed her out of the hog barn and walked with her or right behind her to the red shed. I think accident, some people think another person killed her. ( maybe tracking her with cell phone app ? ) I do not understand how the jury found him guilty .
@@tracyd693 , I feel the same way I any guy that would let his wife be gone for 30 days staying with her uncle and he taken care of the kids in the farm in that I feel he is not in that he is not guilty
The prosecutor saying "the day of amys murder" and the defense not objecting is a microcosm of what a lousy defense team he had.
The defense stipulated prior to trial that she was indeed murdered. Just that Todd didn’t do it. They abandoned the accidental fall strategy when autopsy revealed 6 holes in her back.
@@ronque23 You are correct. I really think they shouldn't have abandoned the idea of an accident though. As another commentor points out, if she was that dizzy, and fell on that fork, she could have tried to get up off it, and somehow reinjured herself. Unlikely, yet not impossible. They should have left that door open. Pretty lousy defense in my opinion. Now he sits in Fort Madison...
Elle a le droit de dire meurtre vu que le médecin légiste a dit que c était un meurtre
He needs a better defense attorney. I hope he is found not guilty.
Do you think he is protecting his son..? I just started watching as I was on Livestream for the Heather Elvis trial.
Idiotic statement. He is guilty ffs.
Well it's a shame that you would hope a murderer walks free. Good thing this jury was logical & attentive! Kudos to them for getting it right.
The questions are meaningless . Get to the point.
Exactly! But she can’t get to the point because there is no point. They have nothing So she keeps talking in circles
She tried to show he lies. Asking questions about things he said to trap him into lying.
@@Elzubi Right. There's always a method to the madness.
DONALD1951 Yes she is an idiot.
DONALD1951 the point is the big picture. The prosecutor is describing in great detail him finding his wife that day and him handling her body, every detail of that ordeal and he has absolutely no emotion. If he was innocent he would barely be able to think about that let alone talk about it play by play. I think this speaks volumes to his guilt
Todd? They’re on a first name basis? Prosecutors usually would say Mr. Mullis.
I think it backfires because it humanizes him more.
@@Christina4758 I think he did great against the Clown. Prosecutor.
This man didn’t kill his wife, his son testified and his testimony is the same as the father...
Exactly. I really believe if they did a separate autopsy they would find it was an accident, and the different marks was her trying to remove it to get out of the barn to get help.
I can’t figure out where this prosecutor is going, her questions seem pointless, and shouldn’t she be standing up
like make the point. It's riduculous.
Laura she’s making it absolutely glaringly obvious how ridiculous his story is..except not that glaringly obvious or you would’ve notice too..
I don’t think I watched his story I jumped in on the middle. To her credit her closing arguments were very good.
Laura, she’s not standing because it’s not allowed in many districts. Why? Because when lawyers stand and strut with boom voice they’re actually controlling the room. It’s dramatic but it also “threatens” many witnesses because it intimidates them. Standing is a power position if the subject (witness) is sitting. A lot of truth in this theory but it’s not as interesting or fun to watch, that’s for sure.
That makes sense, I didn’t know that
Not guilty imo !!! The prosecutor has not proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt imo!!! The prosecutors voice is so annoying and overbearing!!! Lol 😂
Omg her voice sounds automated. I kept looking to see if my sound was in a fast foward mode
tea berrie lol 😂 ikr
Annoying is putting it mildly. She is new I think. She talks too fast . I agree.
@@stevencharles4074 I agree with you. She is annoying. Too loud ,too fast and makes me agitated . She does sound automated.She wants to get it all out there b4 they object ...
@@donnabidermanpozowicz3874 Yes ...fast speed and annoying. The Dr. had a real weird voice as well.
jeeezus ... wtf is this prosecutor doing .. getting away with this 'line' of questioning. It's ridiculous. His defense lawyer should've been objecting every 2 seconds.
It’s called asking questions…..
Todd's solicitors didnt do a very good job
My gut instinct tells me Todd is innocent
@@kimbrundige6320 Me too, I'm just struggling to get past what he may or may not have said on the phone call to 911. I wish he'd explained it...
they didn't do anything.. cept collect that money
This prosecutor is awful. I give him credit for keeping his cool.
@@justicejane2429 Disagree and I think he is innocent.
@@Christina4758 I agree with you!
The rake had a broken handle, so i'm thinking it was just the right height for her to back into, freak out, and then fall back on the rack a 2nd time. Didn't realize that the handle was broken till just now, so I'm thinking there is plausibility here.
@@dabneyoffermein595 Also she was dizzy. Both the son and him said she was dizzy.
@@InLieuTube lol, no conspiracy theorist here. as it relates to this particular case, you will see 99% of my comments having him guilty as sin. So yea, there goes any need for a "damper". I was looking for any hint of a plausible reason for the disappearance of a corn-rake into the back of a spousal floosey.
Me imitating the prosecutor (at about 180 words per minute): when you put one foot in front of the other, which foot goes first, which toe hits the ground first? When you inhale, do the hairs in your left nostril move to the left or to the right and at what angle?" OMG. KMN. I am so glad I am not the court reporter typing this!
Yeah that lawyer reminds me of all the other criminal lying Pos lawyers! All they want is the money. what a stupid system we have. From the cops on up
how many times do you think he/she had to type the word 'right'
She did a great job
This trial was like a three ring circus. Idk which was worse, the defense or the prosecution.
It is beyond me how they could find Todd Mullins guilty.
It’s simple math…. Rake had 4 prongs… she had 6 punctures…. He left Tristen in the barn alone to kill Amy.
@greenblood64 you probably believe Chris Coleman didn't murder his own family
The prosecutor sucks. Don’t make a statement then ask “right? at the end. She’s putting words in his mouth
this shouldn't have been allowed.. even the judge should've stepped in with the way she carried on
Agreed! This is a innocent man! His defense team just sat back and let the prosecutor run the show.
Defense lawyer should've knocked her off her roll by objecting like crazy. He just sits there like a bump on a log!
Todd Mullis was a bad witness in his defense. The cross examination was really bad too.
I never thought about that when she uses the word "right" all the time....it's very leading which is not allowed in a court of law if objected to.
A gerbil in a suit would have made a better defence attorney for this guy wtf
Lol
Where is Juan Martinez when you need him??!!! sheesh
She's not bad, she soft spoken, but she is getting him to a point where he is lying, I hope the jury can see this
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🙌🏼🤣🤣🤣👍🏼👍🏼
LoveTiffanyRae he would of been a savage
Juan Martinez is now working in Auto Theft--no joke. Look it up. Definitely demoted.
Actually he's not needed in this case. She has a very methodical & clever way of questioning him.
PROSECUTOR NEEDS SOME VALIUM. PLEASE,. SHE IS A MESS.
She missed a big moment when she didn't say "that's a lie, right" when he neglected (on purpose) to mention Jerry's affair with Amy. She skimmed right to what happened between Amy and Jerry instead of nailing him with the lie. An opportunity that I rarely see a prosecutor miss, except here.
IF IT SO HAPPENS!! UGH! I WAS LOOKING AROUND FOR A CORN RAKE TOO! Can't get over 12 jurors bought all her crazy lies. Most female prosecutors with this attitude turn off a jury. I know I couldn't listen!! Thanks for the laugh!! Valium...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How did this guy get convicted?
Right. And Casey Anthony didn’t. Unbelievable.
@@raigenhuss7030 The story of her death was a bit unbelievable. She had wounds as though she was hit once with the rake and it doesnt go deep enough so someone did it again. Inconsistent with falling on the rake.
through a farce trial
the jurors were interviewed and explained.
I don’t think he’s guilty. I think he got railroaded. How could a detective think it’s ok not to check fingernails because they think they have their suspect? That’s the most ignorant approach to law enforcement I’ve ever seen.
Or arrogant...
@Joyce Nesselhauf it was concluded Amy had been murdered and didn't have an accident (even by Todd's attorney). If Todd or the kids didn't do this, who did? Perhaps it was the same person who murdered OJ and Ronald Goldman.
A cross between Pierce Morgan and Charlie Sheen.
Charlierce Morgeenan!
Pierlie Sheergan!
I had too much fun with this 😅
😃😃
Why didn't Amy yell for help? Whether she fell or was being attacked by Todd, she could have yelled for Tristan. Wouldn't she have screamed in pain, even if she fell?
Nancy Rose they said the other barn they were in was as big as a football field. I think it’s possible it happened when Trystan was the farthest away and couldn’t hear. ? Who knows?!
@@holly4vanhorn That makes sense. So, does his guilty verdict mean Tristan was lying? I have so many questions! Thanks!
People rarely yell when they are stabbed in the back. It’s like drowning you expect it to be a wild scene but it’s usually a silent death. There was only a few drops of blood it all probably pooled within her body
Amanda, thanks for responding. I didn't know these things.
Nobody really knows what Tristan may have actually heard. Hes clearly about protecting his dad. I dont judge him for that. Its a horrible place for a kid to be abd natural tendency.
Investigators never looked into anyone else! They need to look into the boyfriend and his wife amongst others. This case should be dismissed just based on the investigation alone.
There was NO ONE else on the farm. Period. There also was NO ONE with a motive either. (Other than yours truly sitting on the witness stand). Also you are clearly missing the point. IF someone wanted to murder her (which their was no one) how did they do it in the short time she went from the barn to the shed to get the pet carrier AND EVEN MORE importantly, how did they know she would be going into the shed at that exact moment??? Thats why jurors have to be logical and depict whats "reasonable". (For the record, the boyfriend & his wife were looked into. They had nothing to do with it).
I completely agree!!!! was thinking the same
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is h
@@billhildebrand5053 Go preach somewhere else, honey !! THIS is NOT a religion forum !!
@@marcosmarin8930 I’m glad you heard it. .....❤️😆❤️
this has mistrial written all over it
Oh yea.
@@80slady69 Yupr your so right.
his attorneys are so useless.
Well that sure didnt happen! Can't imagine why you thought it would be a mistrial. I thank God this was a logical jury.
@@nikkib5753 yes
Since when would that pet carrier weigh over 10 lbs. This trial is a travesty ! This guy deserves a new trial with real lawyers and an intelligent jury! Actually he never should have been arrested!
Agreed! That pet carrier def doesn't weigh more than 10lbs I have 2 of those and can carry one on each hand with my painful arthritic hands, they are big, bulky but not heavy
If I hear “it just so happened” one more time! Shut up woman he is NOT GUILTY!
He is guilty.
Yeah she would rip him a new one
There is no history of violence from him.
I notice that he seems passively annoyed with the prosecutor during his cross examination. I think he has the potential to become violent.....that mug shot, wow!
He's not guilty.
WOW, there are a lot of leading questions going on here!
As part of EACH question, reviewing info already discussed IS NOT "leading". Believe me, no prosecutor is going to "lead" a defendant. Thats why there are no objections from his attorneys. Now a defense attorney may "lead" (at least try to) their client.
@@nikkib5753 You really know your stuff! 😂
@@christinabutler7142 you know it girl!! I pay attention to EVERYTHING. I also use common sense, not emotion like some of these other clowns. Thanks girl, you made my day!!😅😂🤣
@@nikkib5753 Leading is allowed in the cross examination.
I think he is innocent and had lousy representation
She really needs to stop with the drama and over emphasizing words he may or may not have said. She sounds like a dope when she is dramatically speaking
This ain't going nowhere..
Not Guilty.
Really? Googling What's the punishment for killing cheating wife?? 😳 Unless the son did it I guess and he's protecting him
@@0Wednesdayschild0 He had a motive, he stood to loose a lot of property in a divorce. They were already separated.
Well he's guilty
What a condescending prosecutor, she's not talking to a child!
I noticed her condesending tone too. The valley girl "soooo" made me what to send her to her room. She basically appears to be testifying and not asking questions.
No but nobody knows the education level of the jury. Thats who her speech is geared toward
A hard-working man and tough in many regards, but I find him pretty credible-- and most likely innocent.
Except..... evidence doesn't lie. Thank God no one with your logic was on the jury.
he is so calm doesn't seem guilty but who else could it be. is he on a relaxant of some sort.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is he
If I were defense counsel, I would object every time the prosecutor refers to the death as a murder.
He cant object because it was ruled a murder by the MA
The defense said it was a murder too. Huge mistake as we have seen from the verdict.
How did they come to the conclusion it was murder? Because some doctor said so? What are the facts that make it a murder? Did I miss something?
@@gmsgms3638 There are four tines on the corn rake and she had 6 plus wounds on her. If she fell on it there would be no more than four poke holes from the rake. If she was attacked with it someone stabbed her more than once. I guess they figure she would only fall on it once haha.
@@gmsgms3638 The rake had been used many times, and in different directions. The defense also said it was a murder.
Prosecutor is clutching at straws..... Really don't think he killed his wife... I think this wasn't investigated properly from the start....
Corn rake - DNA
Finger nails DNA
I also think other people could of a reason to harm her... Ex lover or their wives....
Even the son... Possibly...
He does seem ruffled during cross examination... Ummmm
I thought about the son too.
@@80slady69 Ya if the son did it, it might explain the sons reluctance to testify against his dad?
i thought he stayed perfectly calm for all her hammerong away.
Implausible that a man who had been farming his whole life would leave a very sharp rake face-up on the ground. That along with the internet searches about killing a cheating wife is pretty damning.
Yup and he said "the rake has been all over the property" when it's been broken since 2012?
But then he said the rake was in the shed since 2012. He can't stop lying and changing stories.
Who is this calm when you are talking about your wife who has just been killed, I would be out of my mind if something happened to my husband, OMG
Exactly he's freaking weird
He has had a year to grieve and calm down. If he was crying people wouldn't believe him either. I still think he is doing a great job. He may or may not be guilty. I hope he's innocent, but I don't think anyone will ever know. With the Moorer couple, I had no doubt they were guilty.
Let's assume he didn't kill his wife. Since her death, he's learned that she was again having a serious affair, was secretly moving furniture and other assets to her brother's, and planning to divorce him and take his farm and the kids. I wouldn't expect him to be too sad after learning all of that.
Karen Lombardi She wasn't just killed. A year has passed & he's had numerous people asking him questions so he's had to go over all this many times by now.
You know they are coached to not show a lot of emotion on the stand, right?
I don’t think he did it. Watch Todd Kendhammer. Now that’s guilty
This prosecutor is hell-bent to get him ! I still say this was a freak accident..... :( She harps on Amy's dizziness but, Amy had already had plans to go shopping with a child in her car to get boots. He told her he would get the carrier if she couldn't do it. He and Trysten both told her to go back to the house !
Yeppers.
Freak accident? What did she do, bounce of the rake, turn and land on it again? wtf?
@@PriorLib74 exactly!! You can't fall on a rake on your back, flip over and curl up in a fetal position!! Just can't happen!!
Shannon Warren Sure you could if you rolled onto all fours trying to get help...they're also making a big deal out of a simple dnc ...4 days later u would be fine...unless she developed an infection . All of this is hard to believe...the idiocy in this trial is unreal....I hope he gets another trial and not 20 years down the road. He needs to appeal and be released on bond! This woman led a double life...god knows who may have been after her ...the last e mails to the bf .he was being rude and short with her and she still kept at it....troubled woman for sure.
Susan Agreed. Any of us who have lived on a farm have seen many strange accidents. If she fell, she could have hit her face, fell on the rake, tried to get up & fell back again. Landing on the tines would have flipped up the handle which would in turn hit something changing the position of the rake. Many of us on farms have had a rake take on a life of its own. If you're not familiar with these things it might seem strange but its really true. Also, she was in a position & location that someone trying to crawl out to get help would be in. If the prosecutor thinks it couldn't have been anyone else who could have killed her because he would have heard them, then why wouldn't that apply if he killed her? The son would have heard something. If she was attacked she likely would have cried out but no one heard her cry out. However, she might not have cried out if she fell.
If it is murder, seems difficult to think it would be anyone other than Todd. As an aside, I am starting to feel like sticking a cornrake in the prosecutor.
Shes just not fast at trippig him up
Oh yeah and she had a baby inside her and they were getting married her n somebody
@@deborahfranks9671 someone married her, UGH.
Hahahaha! I'll help u
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Cannot stand the prosecutor! Even when she is mistaking, she quickly says "And..." followed by another rushed question as if all she wants is to interrupt him and scare him by talking super fast. This could backfire big time on the State. We just saw this happening in the Skylar Richardson case.
He didn't do this not a chance
On my neighbors farm last year he was on a step ladder trying to reach a wire to a light, fell and his hand knocked some tools off one being a hoe, as he landed on the ground his head hit the hoe and cut half his ear off and cut a nice gash in his head. Amy was dizzy several times the day she died. It's not too far fetched to think she may have fallen on the corn rake and rolled over trying to crawl outside. He could have killed her. It could have been an accident. And yes it could have been someone prowling around on the property. Happens all the time.
Apparently the rake went into her back twice
The Foo !! Hahahaha
Fallen on it, pulled it out and fell on it again?
Exactly!
Forensics doesn't lie and forensics says it's murder. Most women (or men) are murdered by their spouse or ex spouse. It's pretty rare to be murdered by someone else.
Prosecutor does NOT understand how google or gmail works. She has no idea that all devices you login to will show all searches on every device. They did NOT show the by device id for these searches. I suspect request to google does not even asked google for specific device they requested requested by email. I can login to my email on any device and my searches will show.
Um..was that English?
Interesting to see the other side of Todd compared to his folksy self while being examined by the defense.
djhutch5dh yes short and anger he is not emotional at all with this whole mess
Lol he replies" I think I did know the corn rake was inside the shed I put it there" lol Dummy just sort of incriminated himself
Lol she gives him chances to blame other cars or noises could come around up to area but no he didnt hear anyone nor anything. Lol!!
@@juliaxoxo6020 that's if he's trying 2 lie
@Substance82 Yeah. Now he looks surly and angry.
Right...? Right...?Right...? Right...?Right...? Right...?Right...? Right...?Right...? Right...?
I dont know why she thinks a flip phone can't have internet access. A friend of mine has a flip phone and it does everything my smartphone does. Granted the screen is quite small, but internet searching can be done all day, every day on it.
Depends on the phone and the service provided.
The officer who examined the electronic devices seized from the home stated that the flip phone did not have internet access.
I have a friend with a flip phone & she doesn't have internet access. Maybe some of them do, but hers doesn't.
The prosecutor answers her own questions, and the defense knows to let her keep talking.
Ain't that the truth. And her saying *"Right? Sorry."*
Yes they're called "leading questions".
I've never been so annoyed.. Imagine having to sit on the jury,, same dam room,,?
@@FLo-jc7ig ahahaha yup
Yeah . . I thought they're supposed to ask open-ended questions giving him the opportunity to trip himself up.
I like the Prosecutor....she doesn’t attack, almost putting the defendant at ease. I think she is very clever.
Karen Tidy ya she knows what’s up
Karen Anne she’s clever and annoying but it’s on purpose to get him rattled.
Condescending more like it, imo.
Jeanne McCarthy I looked him up. I think his main thing is personal injury. Not much experience as a trial lawyer. (Obviously)
Shes awful.
All I know is, if I were on the witness stand and this prosecutor was asking me these questions in the same snarky, sarcastic and arrogant tone, she’d be going in for a full set of dental implants and I’d be going off to jail. Oh well, glad I’m not in his shoes. She is moderately annoying to listen to though.
Amen! She seems very unhappy, and argumentative... NOT professional At ALL.
I see her more in a position at the DMV. She could fight with people all day long there....
And your reaction is the EXACT reaction they want you to have! Not only proves how quickly you can become angered, but proves you just might be unstable. It wouldn't be a good look to a jury evaluating you.
@@notthatnikinicole1015 actually shes genius at this style of questioning. Not only does she NOT appear "unhappy", she has just the right mix of sarcasm & being condescending and she delivers it in such an effortlessly calm tone, HE is too dumb to even pick up on it.
U should listen to juan, Jody Arias attorney then u would really know a hateful attorney.
@@normacolon9618 Juan Martinez is a fine prosecutor and did an excellent job convicting Jody Arias.
This is so desperate, foaming at the mouth for a conviction, sounds personal!
Maybe she’s a cheater
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is he
feminist
She leads the witness into an answer. For example, "She came home but she was probably tired, right?" This leads the person being questioned to answer yes. As opposed to "Was she tired when she came home?"
Yeah, she's a dirty lying lawyer , all corrupt, only care any money
Why isn't the judge intervening?
wtf
@@KumiKotara I gave an example of leading a witness & not leading a witness on the same topic. What are you not understanding?
Wow@@caryulmer5578 Sensitive much?
He's a good guy, he's not even trying to point the finger at any one of her possible lovers, this man is credible!
Jeanne McCarthy - why a corn rake? Too obvious.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is he
i find him very credible.
@@groupie4ever My first instinct would be to yank the rake out too, and he knows how far away he lives from medical care!
It sounded like he was counting out while administering CPR...
1...2...3...4...
Sure, when you are looking for anything, in order to blame someone, to be able to point the finger and be angry at your whole life... Instead of SERIOUSLY doing all of the foot work... Leaving no stone unturned...
You can make muffled, stressed, full of anxiety whisper sound "four" into " whore"
Exactly, I could hear different things. But four makes good sense. Why didn't his lawyer say that?
Hard-Sided Cat Carrier:
5 most popular hard-sided cat carriers are:
AmazonBasics Two-Door Pet Kennel: 4.9 lbs
Petmate Sky Kennel: 2.2 lbs
Aspen Pet Porter Carrier: 2 lbs
Catit Style Voyager: 3 lbs
Pet Magasin Hard-Sided Carrier: 2.2 lbs
So, on average, a hard-sided carrier weighs about 2.8 lbs
How did he kill her if he was with his son when she died?
I think the only real explanation is that Tristan lied to cover for his dad.
maybe the person she had an affair with killed her
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is he
Why the prosecutor allowed to say, "murder"??? Was it an accident or murder...
PHILICIA DRAYTON because even the deffense agreed that it was murder
@@chelsealondon3982 thank you
Farmer Mullis is a liar, E-I-E-I-O. Bam! Slam dunk for the prosecution. This man is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. I hope the jury bring their common sense to deliberations.
...made me laugh! A welcom respote from processing the depths and breadth of emotions , violence , traumas , and Losses connected with the events that’ve brought this case to trial.
I agree Meredith!
Definition of reasonable doubt by the courts...“It is not required that the government prove guilt beyond all possible doubt. The test is one of reasonable doubt. A reasonable doubt is a doubt based on reason and common sense - the kind of doubt that would make a reasonable person hesitate to act. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt must, therefore, be proof of such a convincing character that a reasonable person would not hesitate to rely and act upon it in the most important of his own affairs. The jury will remember that a defendant is never to be convicted on mere suspicion and conjecture.”
Yes, he is Meredith.
Meredith I concur!!
The lawyer keeps saying murder
Why doesn’t his lawyer object?
Because Amy was murdered ?? 🤷♀️
She could say dies or died...she is constantly calling him a murder before the jury decides.
This prosecutor sucks
This is the worst cross examination to ever witness.
Urgh, the prosecutor is so patronizing...
Why is this prosecutor sitting on her ass? I’m really not liking this prosecutor at all. I really don’t see the guilt here.
Both sides have been sitting while they ask questions to the witness.
Want till she sees all these posts. If she doesn't change her attitude and sloopy questioning then. ....there no hope lol
Can we consider the son changing his statement? Isn't he the one saw the murder scene and body?
Right!?
He has had a year to grieve and calm down. If he was crying people wouldn't believe him either. I still think he is doing a great job. He may or may not be guilty. I hope he's innocent, but I don't think anyone will ever know. With the Moorer couple, I had no doubt they were guilty.
It is hard to decide guilt or innocence
Is it possible that one of the men she had an affair with killed her ?
Or one of her lovers significant other.
Why?
The prosecutor is making this murderer seem like a good guy...
He sort of looks like Michael J. Fox
@Sue Ann Natter Oh you're right. I hadn't noticed that before.
Tracy F i think more like Michael J. Fox
Sue Ann Natter, he is very handsome imo. Amy probably thought she had made a great catch. Their children are probably good looking too. I think her problem was she wasn't being sexually satisfied. The son said he sleeps in the living room because he has back trouble. It wasn't nice of her to cheat. It wasn't good that he was watching porn either.
This man needs a new trial
June 28th I believe he may get a chance
The uterus is an organ wth is she nuts? If i had to explain to a young kid that procedure id search for a diagram of the female human body with its organs.
I find him extremely shifty....those searches were obviously made by him....
This is a guy who's pride has stitched him up! May God have mercy on him.
@Charles H Geis IV I believe he's innocent to I believe he was set up but also the guy that was that was messing around with his wife they should do something to him cuz I feel Todd was trying to get his met marriage back on track and that guy was interfering with it they should get some kind of jail time to!
@NibiruLives You like conspiracy stories don't you?
Maybe he's protecting the kid?
Really?! Amazing how ppl just see what they want but not the actual truth.
Too bad there wasn't a google search asking if divorce is a better option than murder.
It's my understanding than when someone is lying, they look up and to the left. When he's talking about where the rake is prior to the incident he's doing exactly that.
Whatever the truth is, may justice be served here. Men, and ladies; when you take a vow, make sure you stand to preserve it!
Cerulean c No, whether a person looks up & to the left or right depends on which hemisphere in their brain is dominant. It's also connected to handedness. He's right handed so likely the left hemisphere in his brain is more dominant so he would look up & to the left when he has to think about something. He had to search his memory to remember the location of the rake so that question would cause him to look up & to the left. It doesn't happen if a person is asked something they can easily remember & don't have to search their memory for.
Either way, that answer struck me as disingenuous. That was my point.
Cerulean c I understand. His looking up/left only indicates thinking about something so it could very well be his answer wasn't honest. We just can't tell that for sure about eye movement.
@@caryulmer7063 Fair enough. I appreciate your take-.
@@caryulmer7063 Yeah, I appreciate your rake on this too.
I have never fallen on a on a corn rake before... I did however step on one and the handle smashed me in the face and knocked me out. A few hour later I came to and stepped on the same rake again. I filed a lawsuit against the rake.
Lol...
lol I shouldn't laugh really...
ERICK and The Ourbacks 😂😂😂
Did the rake win?
Of course... that is what happens
Why she sounds like she’s really emotionally invested in this case and is taking it personal. The way she says murder over and over and her uppity attitude comes across as so unprofessional. Why can’t she ask questions without being so hostile.
The prosecutor doesn't let her witness finish talking before she interrupts them. That's totally annoying.
All she can say it right right right christ sake
I think he’s guilty!
I believe her son did it. He is very cold and incredibly indifferent to the death of his mother.
That could be a possibility.
I have thought the same thing but if I mention it in a group, I am attacked. But I cleaned up the audio a bit. It's amazing what he really says....and Todd is speaking to Trysten.
@@lorimoore5182 I have 2 sons, its not like it hasn't happened before..I mean look at what the Menendez brothers did to their mother. I dont give a crap if people like what I say.. we are all entitled to our own opinions. He just sounded so cold.and if I was dead and my.ex put my dead body on one of my boys while he drove to the hospital.. my kids would have jumped out the window.screaming and crying and then sought therapy for a good 20 to 30 years...
That has been my gut feeling all along!
Dumb take
Really lawyer. No objections whatsoever!! 😣😣😣
Can't believe how many actually believe a guy is not guilty, as soon as he looses some fat, looks ok and doesn't scream profanities. There is not much of a defense. Nobody was there except him and the kids, as he admitted. The searches show how he planned the murder for a while and desperately looked for the best "accident". Obviously he had hoped to get her in one blow from the back, but she heard something and moved, so he had to do more. And I read here how she "set him up" to be a suspect for her murder... Lol people. She couldn't stab herself 2 or three times in the back with that fork and then land on her hands and knees - and beat herself up first. And no she didn't deserve it just because she cheated on that control freak. Women are not posession of their husbands.
He'd have to be awfully stupid to be researching something he planned on carrying out since everyone knows it would be easy to find out he did that on his computer. His farm seemed fairly sophisticated to operate, & he owned more than 1 farm, so he can't be a stupid man.
I can't be the only one who can't stand the prosecutor's voice. It sounds so....strained. Hard to listen to.
Freak Accident... This is a circus
He had a dang flip phone. You guys really think he understood gmail and internet searches? Hold up. Let me google wedding dresses.
The cats 🐈 did it
The cats are innocent.
What(?) =^o^=
That's why they took out those pesky cameras!
The son found her and he was mad at his Mom for cheating? Maybe the son did it?😣
Doreen Alcaraz it would take some strength to get that pitchfork through another person. I doubt he could do it.
I thought about that too
@@carolatkinson3868 Trysten like Todd would have had to leave immediately after Amy in order to have killed her. Trysten testified that Todd and himself were working in the barn immediately after Amy left.
No!!! Son didn't do it. She might ran into something else B4 rake. We have several barns nothing but sharp tools and equipment everywhere. Full of work tools.
If Todd had just taken his kids to Sunday school and church, I Proverbs 6:24 to 34 - it tells us that a man's fury at someone having violated his marriage wows - in comparison to thieves in verse 30 - is complex in that going to sleep with your neighbours wife will not go unpunished. Read it - see how this could have been prevented by both couples.
Warning Against Adultery
20 My son, keep your father’s command
and do not forsake your mother’s teaching.
21 Bind them always on your heart;
fasten them around your neck.
22 When you walk, they will guide you;
when you sleep, they will watch over you;
when you awake, they will speak to you.
23 For this command is a lamp,
this teaching is a light,
and correction and instruction
are the way to life,
24 keeping you from your neighbor’s wife,
from the smooth talk of a wayward woman.
25 Do not lust in your heart after her beauty
or let her captivate you with her eyes.
26 For a prostitute can be had for a loaf of bread,
but another man’s wife preys on your very life.
27 Can a man scoop fire into his lap
without his clothes being burned?
28 Can a man walk on hot coals
without his feet being scorched?
29 So is he
Such a nice caring husband. 🤷♀️ Makes you wonder why she cheated. 🤦🏼♀️
Men can lie to your face, did you know that? Maybe he was super controlling.
( I’m being sarcastic by the way)
I 100% believe he was controlling.
You’re delusional
Karina K oh sorry
( All good Sharon). 🤣
I’ve watched a lot of trials, I’m NOT any type of expert but why is this Prosecutor asking so many "seemingly" unimportant questions?
I don’t believe he killed her. Accidents happen doing farm work. I know a man that cut his arm off. That attorney is hooked up on the phone and lap tap.
Human greed he did not want to lose half his farm so instead decided to kill his cheating wife and the worst part is that he let his young son find her after he killed her,an image he would have to live with for the rest of his life,well in the end he lost everything,I hope the jury’s see through his lies and put him where he belongs for the kids and her family I pray for them.
He is innocent.
He is lying about those searches
omgosh she had an abortion!
He kinda reminds me of Colin Firth.
The police/detectives went to the farm with his young son, while Todd went to the hospital with his wife. Who knows what could have happened in his absence, you know, with the cameras?
An accident ??? Explain the 6 holes in her back when the fork had only 4 prongs ‼️
Well why not 8 (4&4)?
Maybe she got off it then passed out and fell back onto it. What's annoying is that crazy things can happen. Maybe this is one case in a million or more where she really did die accidentally, but we'll never know for sure because there were no witnesses.
Creek or crick 😂
Michele Palagano, creek.
Thats so funny bc I live in a farming community in northern Illinois and we say CRICK as well :)
@@noaheinstein2369 No not everywhere. Its Crick where I grew up.
Logan Hensley, but but but it’s spelled c r e e k. If god wanted you to pronounce it ‘crick’ he would have spelled it c r i c k. See?
@@noaheinstein2369 no we spell it crick just like it sounds.. Its a country thing ... We all know (well I do at least) know that's not how its pronounced or spelled but thats how we say it and spell it.... Now I'm wondering if people around here are dumb enough to actually think that's what its called and thats how it's really spelled.... Lol
I love how prosecutor is breaking Todd's story down step by step... Leading him up to that moment where he whispers "die whore" .... His eyes darted over to his attorney..... He heard it and knew everyone else did too! Great job prosecutor!
As for not hearing Amy scream, she had the wind knocked out of her. Can't scream.
How do you know he killed her? Did you see him do it?
Todd had a lousy defense team didn't do him right
oh please all she did was ask him 19 million times if he likes to farm. should of asked herself if she likes ice cream. BAD job prosecution!!
I didn’t hear anything like that. Ridiculous he was found guilty.
I wouldn't even answer that prosecutor
For what reason. She’s polite to him 🤷♀️
Those internet searches are pretty damning. The prosecutor may be annoying but she is methodically hitting her marks. She annunciates well and uses that tone perfectly. Her questions with timed subtle sarcasm and doubt. Excellent job. I believe he will be found guilty.
Is his lawyer a public defender he must think this case is a lost cause or he thinks his client is guilty he dosnt defend him much he's left on his own hardly heard any objections