Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Brad Jersak: Plato, Plantinga, and Paul-toward Christian knowing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 лют 2020
- Rev Dr Brad Jersak explores Christian knowing through Plato, Plantinga, and Paul the Apostle. This is an incredibly important topic for Christians today as most of us feel caught between the conservative ‘Biblical’ view that dominates Sydney evangelicalism, and a more liberal humanist view that seems to threaten the pillars of faith. Brad has a rich mind and insightful perspectives, including a deep understanding of the early church fathers. He will offer us a much wider paradigm of knowing and revelation that does not toss out the Bible but balances it. In so doing he will demonstrate that far from this being a dangerous liberalising of truth, we are only recapturing the dominant orthodoxy that characterised the early church.
iTunes, Spotify, and SoundCloud:
www.gospelconv...
Social Media:
/ gospelconversations
Sources:
ssu.ca/staff-f...
wildgoosechase....
www.amazon.com...
www.amazon.com...
plato.stanford...
commons.wikime...
en.wikiquote.o...
www.biblegatew...
www.biblegatew...
biblehub.com/g...
www.biblegatew...
brianzahnd.com...
Bradley you have opened a whole new world of God's love and helped me trust him even in my unknowing. Truly he is my shelter and refuge.
So blessed by your seeking 💛 🦋
Thanks Bradley!
A wonderful overview of Christian knowing. I always learn from Brad Jersak. Thank you Gospel Conversations for hosting him.
Delighted that you found it encouraging.
Thanks very much guys! Great talk and wonderful to be able to watch it, hear the audience voice their thoughts and questions and read the text. Very well put together. Thank you!
You're most welcome :) If we had an audience mic I would've been able to include even more of the audience's contributions. Impressively, Brad facilitated a group conversation with 60 people for half an hour after the talk too.
Loved the nuanced explanation of knowledge by Rev Dr Brad. God used him in my journey of being a more insightful speaker that can invite more inquisitiveness rather than dogmatism in my conversations with Skeptics. This is my 1st video listening to Brad as he was recommended to me by an Orthodox friend. To my online Orthodox friends, are there any teachers you value similar to Brad and/or what are your favorite subjects Brad has taught on?
Delighted to hear how you've been blessed by Brad! One of the things that all Gospel Conversations' speakers have in common is "inquisitiveness rather than dogmatism" (www.gospelconversations.com/speakers). All those speakers are on our podcast (www.gospelconversations.com/podcast), however, we've only just started producing videos. Of the videos we've done so far, Robin Parry's views overlap the most with Brad's (reforminghell.com/robin-parrys-hope-hell-videos/), although Tony also has a significant amount in common (e.g. ua-cam.com/video/8fq7xvqQoHQ/v-deo.html). We also have Esther Meek (www.longingtoknow.com/about-esther.html) coming later this year to do our conference on "Loving to Know" (epistemology).
Him bringing up Alvin Platinga's idea of "Sufficient Warrant" at 16:39 was very interesting as well.
Indeed, I found that very helpful.
Thank you such a great talk. It makes me think about what do people mean when they say the bible is infallible and inherent?
good stuff :)
I'm glad you enjoyed it :)
3:25-Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know Me, Philip? Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? John 14: 9
Did Brad just come out as an Universalist here?
Brad mentions Christ's "Cosmic Redemption" a few times in this talk but doesn't explicitly mention "universalism or universalist." However, his review of DBH's "That All Shall Be Saved" is worth checking out ua-cam.com/video/6o2w3oHMM_k/v-deo.html
hopeful inclusivist / ultimate redemption but not comfortable with universalism. www.clarion-journal.com/clarion_journal_of_spirit/2019/09/harts-that-all-will-be-saved-ii.html
An accumulation of weak evidence does not make a solid argument. Excellent exercise in sophistry.