If War Thunder's F-100D was historically accurate

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2021
  • Originally built as a private venture by North American Aviation, the F-100 Super Sabre was a vastly redesigned and improved take on the F-86 Sabre. The F-100 was largely received well thanks to its high performance and ease of use, but operational service left stains on its reputation. The F-100 had an alarmingly high accident rate and saw multiple redesigns. Weaknesses with the wings, vertical stabilizer, and engine killed multiple pilots. Though it was originally designed as an air superiority fighter, it was quickly pressed into the fighter-bomber role. The F-100 would never get to prove its mettle against enemy aircraft, only confirmed to have shot down a single bogey during the Vietnam War, where it was relegated primarily to close air support and suppression of enemy air defense duties.
    Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
    Songs used (in order from first to last):
    Halo: CE - Perilous Journey
    Halo 3: ODST - Rain (Deference for Darkness)
    Sources:
    F-100 In Action - Larry Davis
    North American F-100 - David Anderton
    Aerospace Safety - Air Force
    Aircraft Accident and Maintenance Review - Volume 13
    F-100 Super Sabre In Color - Robert Robinson
    F-100 Super Sabre - Ray Wagner
    Second channel: / @spookstoon
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=2750276
    Twitter: / spookston
    Reddit: /u/spookston
    Discord: / discord
    Twitch: / spookstonwt
    Steam: goo.gl/BYQjC9
    #tanks​​ #aircraft #warthunder
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 388

  • @fallout200
    @fallout200 3 роки тому +858

    Something interesting about the F-100 is that my grandfather had to climb into the intake while the engine was running to do repairs. He had a rope tied around his leg to make sure he wasn’t sucked in.

    • @the32bitguy
      @the32bitguy 3 роки тому +166

      That is certainly interesting...

    • @jldldr3933
      @jldldr3933 3 роки тому +255

      F-100 confirmed as an unstopable SUCC machine

    • @romanszwarc3288
      @romanszwarc3288 3 роки тому +91

      My grandfather had to do the same, but with a mig 19, and the engine was turned off

    • @An0beseGiraffe
      @An0beseGiraffe 3 роки тому +26

      Was there a particular reason why the engine had to be on during the repairs? Would love to know :)

    • @romanszwarc3288
      @romanszwarc3288 3 роки тому +71

      @@An0beseGiraffe he probably was checking the blades with the engine running at low rpm so it would turn

  • @blah007001
    @blah007001 3 роки тому +1228

    "total wing failure" Those are not a combination of words I want to see regarding an airplane.

    • @Rafael_Fuchs
      @Rafael_Fuchs 3 роки тому +22

      What wing?

    • @jacobs279
      @jacobs279 3 роки тому +50

      @@Rafael_Fuchs if there were any wings they sure as hell aren’t here now

    • @zafranorbian757
      @zafranorbian757 3 роки тому +40

      Not like partial wing faliures are much better when flying mach.

    • @ELing-ib1ki
      @ELing-ib1ki 3 роки тому +14

      Ah yes, a hole in your right wing

    • @hugopepe1722
      @hugopepe1722 3 роки тому +13

      sounds like North Vietnamese SAMs were the least oft the pilot's problems

  • @m1sz3lpl24
    @m1sz3lpl24 3 роки тому +520

    Gotta love "nuclear munition" and "relative accuracy" in one sentence

    • @jasonirwin4631
      @jasonirwin4631 3 роки тому +76

      Don't forget the wonderful phrase "bomb toss".

    • @EasoLV
      @EasoLV 3 роки тому +38

      Low yield against hardened bunkers? Direct hit will be needed, so yeah, even with nukes you need accuracy, as funny it might sound (the reason why ICBM's have dropped in yield is due to improvements in accuracy).

    • @thebravegallade731
      @thebravegallade731 3 роки тому +7

      @@EasoLV lower fallout also means less cleanup

    • @Jonathan-fb1kj
      @Jonathan-fb1kj 3 роки тому +6

      @@thebravegallade731 Usally lower yield equals more fallout.

    • @pivNspace
      @pivNspace 3 роки тому +3

      @@Jonathan-fb1kj eh?

  • @baronentertainment362
    @baronentertainment362 3 роки тому +249

    The low speed instability was so common that the ground crews gave it a nickname, the sabre dance

    • @IronPhysik
      @IronPhysik 3 роки тому +6

      and it was only with the first version of the F-100
      F-100D had it fixed, and pilots got trained how to avoid it, because the dance only happens when the plane gets into a stall at low speed

    • @baronentertainment362
      @baronentertainment362 3 роки тому +11

      It was only with the a version, the d version had wing fences to prevent the sabre dance

    • @shashlik7959
      @shashlik7959 3 роки тому

      If that was implemented it would only happen in sim, air RB planes have fly by wire

  • @marklund117
    @marklund117 3 роки тому +155

    You forgot "all modules currently ingame should come stock, since in real life they dont send jets off to battle with grimy cannons, no G-suit, and no missiles"

    • @fangsout305
      @fangsout305 3 роки тому +20

      And also, a pilot would have at least 50 crew levels but that’s something that should come with realism

    • @oRiley66
      @oRiley66 3 роки тому +4

      @@fangsout305 that's a good point

  • @itaybron
    @itaybron 3 роки тому +158

    "It allowed bomb toss of nuclear munitions with relative accuracy" O_o

    • @LupusAries
      @LupusAries 3 роки тому +37

      .....and half-way decent chances of escape.....
      Nukes, the only weapons where accuracy is a minor concern.....after all a near miss will kill you just as dead as a direct hit.

    • @LtCWest
      @LtCWest 3 роки тому +13

      "Relative" works with physics and nuclear weapons. ^^

    • @Morrigi192
      @Morrigi192 3 роки тому +26

      @@LupusAries Depends. Tanks can be surprisingly resistant to nuclear attack, and also offer decent radiation shielding to the crew. During testing, a British Centurion tank was placed 500 meters from a 9-kiloton tactical nuke in 1953. The blast threw the tank 5 feet and the sheer force would have killed the crew if they were present, but the tank itself was perfectly fine. It was actually placed back into service after being decontaminated. An entrenched tank of more modern design and greater mass would be even more resilient and offer greater protection to the crew.

    • @peanutbutterrabbit2129
      @peanutbutterrabbit2129 3 роки тому

      That was the main purpose of the LABS system

    • @legoeasycompany
      @legoeasycompany 3 роки тому +6

      @@Morrigi192 If sheer force of the blast or the concussion would have killed or liquified the crew of that previous tank there isn't much more that a modern design would be able to do in comparison, for all the wonders of improving tech there isn't much we can do to improve the human crew (yet).

  • @i8yourDog
    @i8yourDog 3 роки тому +336

    "If the F100 was historically accurate"
    *S U C C C A T F I S H*

  • @fernandomarques5166
    @fernandomarques5166 3 роки тому +137

    Plane: Makes a high-G turn
    Wings: A'ight I'mma head out.

    • @SleepySkull1
      @SleepySkull1 3 роки тому +8

      Plane: Takes-off
      Plane: A'ight I'mma head out.
      Plane: Fly in a straight line
      Wings: A'ight I'mma head out.
      Plane: Is still flying straight
      Vertical Stabilizer: A'ight I'mma head out.
      Air force: Wants the F-4 phantom II
      F-100: A'ight I'mma head out.
      Sleepyskull: Stealing someone's comment and not making it anymore funny
      Also Sleepyskull: A'ight I'mma head out.

  • @qade2128
    @qade2128 3 роки тому +271

    Tfw you would need to still grind a year to get it

    • @derpasstwahtskie2246
      @derpasstwahtskie2246 3 роки тому +8

      mmmnoooo? Air is fairly easy to grind.
      Hell I got the A7D withn a week and a half without prem time.
      And if you're talking about starting from stage one? Even then I would say 5 months max if you really put in the effort (without prem time)

    • @Mr-Patate87
      @Mr-Patate87 3 роки тому +3

      @@derpasstwahtskie2246 pretty easf with F4 Phantoms which got flares, AIM-7 spamow, and huge amount of bombs.
      Not the same for frenchies.

    • @standardheat-fs8159
      @standardheat-fs8159 3 роки тому

      @@derpasstwahtskie2246Sweden is also very easy, got 5 tier 5 jets in 5 days

    • @mrbones_7420
      @mrbones_7420 3 роки тому

      @@Mr-Patate87 you need to get the f100 before you can get an f4

    • @mrbones_7420
      @mrbones_7420 3 роки тому +1

      @@derpasstwahtskie2246 depends on player skill and research modifiers on the plane you're grinding with

  • @leopardthebismarck1519
    @leopardthebismarck1519 3 роки тому +273

    I want my f100 war crimes edition with naplam god dam it
    Edit 2: electric Boogaloo

    • @PedroCosta-po5nu
      @PedroCosta-po5nu 3 роки тому +63

      "napalm stick to kids, therefore it's based. -McNamara"

    • @genericscottishchannel1603
      @genericscottishchannel1603 3 роки тому +7

      nuke toss tho
      Hmm

    • @gafeleon9032
      @gafeleon9032 3 роки тому +30

      Cluster munitions are also illegal to use and therefore a war crime in 108 countries because they cause too much damage to the civilian population
      But not for the US *the star sprangled banner starts playing*

    • @hhale
      @hhale 3 роки тому +9

      @@PedroCosta-po5nu *clears throat*...
      (To the tune of Jesus Loves the Little Children
      )
      "Napalm sticks to little children
      All the children of the world
      Red and Yellow, Black and White
      They are burning through the night
      Napalm sticks to all the children of the world"
      Gotta love a good cadence...there is a longer version that has multiple choruses, btw.

    • @LupusAries
      @LupusAries 3 роки тому +11

      @@gafeleon9032 Yeah........ except for those with sensors aka "smart CBUs", like the CBU-97...... everyone is still using them.
      The armaments multinationals must've rolled on the floor with laughter when this accord was passed.
      Suddenly all the old ones were in immediate need of replacement and they could sell a more expensive variant......
      Also you forgot the major other non-signatories like China or Russia.....

  • @simonelibardi1880
    @simonelibardi1880 3 роки тому +52

    1:42 i have noticed this in SB, so it's accurate I think

    • @domportillo9916
      @domportillo9916 3 роки тому +6

      Same here, I wonder if they'll ever work in the dreaded Sabre dance

    • @Atourq
      @Atourq 3 роки тому +3

      Oh yeah, that can happen in RB too, but very rarely because of the nature of RB.

    • @oceanwater1246
      @oceanwater1246 3 роки тому

      I had it happen in my F4 in sim. F4´´s flat spin VERRYYYYY easily if you pull hard in sim, so BE CAREFUL DONT WASTE ALL THAT SPAWN POINTS

  • @thomasjackson5274
    @thomasjackson5274 3 роки тому +56

    "Total Wing Failure"
    "Disintegrate at High Mach"
    "Unrecoverable Flat Spin"
    All things that you ideally don't want to be dealing with in an aircraft if at all possible...

    • @kylebrady969
      @kylebrady969 3 роки тому +8

      Welcome to the dawn of supersonic flight, or the dawn of any flying period.
      The first to innovate are the first to have new problems unless you're incredibly lucky or a fucking genius of the highest order.

    • @termitreter6545
      @termitreter6545 3 роки тому +1

      @@kylebrady969 Theres definitely better and worse innovations, though. The F100 also wasnt even a new thing, but rather a beefed up Sabre. Makes it even less excusable.

    • @michaeledmunds7266
      @michaeledmunds7266 3 роки тому +6

      @@kylebrady969 Safety innovations are written in blood, as they say.

    • @TheTrueAdept
      @TheTrueAdept Рік тому

      @@termitreter6545 the thing was, even just making a beefed up Sabre is frought with possible problems.

    • @termitreter6545
      @termitreter6545 Рік тому

      @@TheTrueAdept Tbf I think there shouldve been generally just a way higher standard of safety demanded for this kind of jet. Probably did more damage than it helped to push experimental stuff too fast.
      Like, theres probably a lot of jets that crashed more than they got shot down.

  • @g_f0rce141
    @g_f0rce141 3 роки тому +86

    Yes!! Saber next!!

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 3 роки тому +2

      How about some props, for example the P51 Mustang or the BF109 (especially the radar and radar alert systems of that time, wich aren't fully integrated into warthunder yet).

    • @majorborngusfluunduch8694
      @majorborngusfluunduch8694 3 роки тому +1

      Saber would be nice.

  • @Foxik58
    @Foxik58 3 роки тому +120

    Next: If David Fletcher was historically accurate

    • @fernandomarques5166
      @fernandomarques5166 3 роки тому +23

      5 sec video saying "he always has been, go watch the tank museum!"

    • @TR33ZY_CRTM
      @TR33ZY_CRTM 3 роки тому +14

      -Due to the fact that there is one David Fletcher, only one Flectcher can be spawned in at any given point
      -Fletcher's moustache can destroy any ground, air, or water vehicle with ease

    • @spiritmoon5998
      @spiritmoon5998 3 роки тому +7

      @@TR33ZY_CRTM -The British accent provides a morale boost for any nearby British vehicles, increasing crew efficiency.
      (I'm American, so sorry if he has a non-British accent and I got it wrong.)

    • @Mr.Hun13r
      @Mr.Hun13r 3 роки тому +3

      -Due to his immense knowledge of armored vehicles expert crewman for any role in any vehicle

    • @danielr.l.mccullough600
      @danielr.l.mccullough600 3 роки тому

      @@Mr.Hun13r -The exception to this is in the loader role, due to his age and lack of physical prowess

  • @mrs.abrams713
    @mrs.abrams713 3 роки тому +19

    1:10 shhhh. Don´t say it that loud : O

    • @Yeeter_Inbound
      @Yeeter_Inbound 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah we don't wanna give gaijin any ideas...

  • @michaelscott9761
    @michaelscott9761 3 роки тому +3

    My grandpa was an f100 pilot at RAF Lakenheath and in 1964 he put his plane into an unrecoverable flat spin. He ejected but because he was in a spin he went through the canopy and injured his legs. He recovered and went on to qualify top gun for the f-4 and fly CAP in Vietnam. Cool that you made this video.

  • @robertw6894
    @robertw6894 3 роки тому +13

    "To prevent entering unrecoverable spins at high angle of attack, high use of the rudder was needed for steering" should have been in there too. Great video otherwise, lad!

  • @thanglalsangguite6205
    @thanglalsangguite6205 3 роки тому +3

    Aw hell yeah! I love the 'if they were historically accurate' videos especially the plane ones.

  • @randommemechannel6066
    @randommemechannel6066 3 роки тому +22

    I am a big fan now that I’ve gon through the different war thunder UA-camrs
    Edit: nice video

  • @Seventeeenth
    @Seventeeenth 3 роки тому +4

    Shit when I heard that radar warning noise I could almost hear Jester screaming "Missle Missle Missle!"

  • @Astro_Guy_1
    @Astro_Guy_1 3 роки тому

    Thank you Spookston for making those vids for Planes!
    Was looking forward to it, theres alot of interesting planes in WT

  • @browning2471
    @browning2471 3 роки тому +1

    cool to see you getting into aircraft

  • @krokodile7203
    @krokodile7203 3 роки тому

    If Strv 103 was historically accurate pls btw love this series

  • @nikolaskeller9987
    @nikolaskeller9987 3 роки тому

    Would love to see more planes in these vids, nice work!

  • @StealthySpace7
    @StealthySpace7 3 роки тому +8

    I talked to an old vet who worked on just about every aircraft we flew from Korea to Vietnam. He said he never had engine problems with the Super Sabers

    • @GrosseSose
      @GrosseSose 3 роки тому

      My parents never had a car-accident, so car-accidents don't happen?

  • @Shadow_Lunatale
    @Shadow_Lunatale 3 роки тому +2

    That was really informative and good, thank you Spookston.
    I like how you shed a light on aircrafts now too. Maybe we can get a historically accurate F-104 one day? In Germany, we named them Widowmaker, "Witwenmacher", because the plane had a surprisingly high crash rate. Most of it was wrong use by the West German army and bad trained pilots in the beginning of the program.

  • @TheRedMartian
    @TheRedMartian 3 роки тому

    I’m so glad you did this Spook. I love the F100

  • @deineMudda952
    @deineMudda952 3 роки тому

    Keep it going! This is a great video, one day Gaijin and a big part of War Thunder will watch your videos.

  • @cydee6766
    @cydee6766 3 роки тому

    You should really make more of these plane videos they are awesome

  • @Xeemix
    @Xeemix 3 роки тому +2

    So heres a fun fact! When Gaijin first introduced the F-100A for China in the dev server it would have its outer wing stall issue resulting in the infamous "sabre dance" when landing, I thought it was really cool but it was removed in the live server.

  • @pappaV001
    @pappaV001 2 роки тому

    My grandfather served as an AP during this planes heyday. He had an incident where the engine on one stalled out mid takeoff, the plane was already 10 feet off the deck and he was at the end of the runway watching this thing coming at him. He needed a change of shorts after it bellied out, bounced, and then crashed behind him

  • @raptors222222
    @raptors222222 3 роки тому +2

    Only a SLIGHT chance to completely disintigrate

  • @daniel_f4050
    @daniel_f4050 3 роки тому

    The nasty ground loop on take off (and landing? can’t remember) was called the “Saber Dance”.
    If (HUGE if) I’m remembering correctly it was caused by the CG being too far back when the Hun was heavily loaded and/or at max fuel. The Dance started when the nose would pitch up to a higher AoA than the pilot wanted or thought he would achieve. He’d then try and correct even though the speed was too low to give him decent elevator authority. All the while the plane was fighting to pitch up. There were multiple fatal crashes before they realized the pilot’s natural instinct to go to full afterburner only made it worse. The fight between pilot and plane set off a really nasty oscillation that lead to a stall while only a few dozen feet above the runway. There are several really scary videos of it here on UA-cam where the F-100 basically tries to balance on the thrust before tipping over and exploding.

  • @youtubeaccount3047
    @youtubeaccount3047 3 роки тому

    I just got back into halo and played combat evolved for the first time and now I can only think of if vehicles were historically accurate

  • @owenbrost4980
    @owenbrost4980 3 роки тому

    I'd like to see more Aircraft videos from this series!

  • @duvagr007
    @duvagr007 3 роки тому

    You mentioned it later on, but the low speed handling and sudden pitching on takeoff was rectified by the time the D came into service. It was mostly do do with the wing shape, and only the A and B really suffered from it.

  • @csbr75
    @csbr75 3 роки тому

    And here I am still grinding for the P-51D

  • @dmdj8588
    @dmdj8588 3 роки тому

    0:09 In F-100A, yes. But F-100C, and D relatively didn't bothered by this issue since they had extended wing with flaps added(F-100A had flaperon on F-100C/D's flap position, F-100C/D's flaperon pulled out to the further side of its main wing.

  • @xAlouette
    @xAlouette 3 роки тому +1

    At last, I can rest in peace knowing that my suggestion has become a video...

  • @MJRSoap
    @MJRSoap 3 роки тому +2

    As far as I'm aware, as Matra Magics were developed to be side winder rail compatible. The French F-100D should be capable of spawning with Magic 1's (Developed in 1975) with the last French unit using F-100D/F's until 1978.
    Actually finding a source of Magic 1's mounted on an F-100 however is going to be damn difficult.
    The French F-100D in game is stuck with fucking Aim-9B's or Mighty mouse rockets as it's only payload options.

    • @jbeverley67
      @jbeverley67 3 роки тому

      The F100S would have never mounted the r550s. It was being replaced and phased out of service in the 70s because it was being replaced by the jaguar. The last f100s were scrapped in 77

    • @MJRSoap
      @MJRSoap 3 роки тому

      @@jbeverley67 What I'm really saying is that I don't see it impossible that they looked at mounting Magic 1's on the last serving F-100D's. As it is in game the French F-100D is the worst one in game simply due to it's lack of payload options, lacking even bombs, it's stuck with only AIM-9Bs as is any other French jet but the Jaguar A and Mirage 3.
      Gaijin has made less realistic equipment options a thing in the past and a lot of French aircraft are facing jets with Aim-9J's, G's etc. while being stuck with Aim-9 "Roll and they miss" B's.

  • @Unl3ashed20
    @Unl3ashed20 3 роки тому +1

    I would really love to see Spookston do a "If War Thunder's Leclerc was historically accurate"

  • @ommsterlitz1805
    @ommsterlitz1805 3 роки тому

    Leclerc next please with things like ' resist it's own most powerful ammo from the front at any range after test by the army"

  • @riotgrrl2666
    @riotgrrl2666 3 роки тому

    I like to guess when the video will end based on the song, i don't know why but it's such a fun lil game

  • @BlackHawkBallistic
    @BlackHawkBallistic 3 роки тому +1

    Pretty sure the F-100D got wing fences to help prevent Sabre Dance.

  • @nitsu2947
    @nitsu2947 3 роки тому

    imagine seeing so many complaints to make the Tiger BR go down for historical accuracy, you had to make a whole series of videos explaining if they had been historical accurate

  • @TheElijahGarcia
    @TheElijahGarcia 3 роки тому

    nice job tricking me into learning real stuff by dressing it up as a videogame video

  • @IronPhysik
    @IronPhysik 3 роки тому +1

    Some corrections:
    0:05 the bad low speed handling was only with F-100A and C
    the D model had that fixed
    0:15 only later D models that got upgraded as part of "Operation High Wire"
    0:25 None of the manuals confirm this, they even go against it by saying the max possible limit on the strongest station is 1500lbs
    also none of the pylons from the F-100 use a 30" hook spacing required for the M118
    1:05 yes, again only late F-100D models

  • @QuintonMurdock
    @QuintonMurdock 3 роки тому +6

    Could you do if warthunder’s OS2u king fisher was historically accurate

  • @wheres_all_the_pie1991
    @wheres_all_the_pie1991 3 роки тому

    I dont even play this game anymore i just watch your videos

  • @F3R_Mauro
    @F3R_Mauro 3 роки тому

    please keep on doing more of this video wt aircraft series, its so fkin awesome! and please think off adding a helicopter series too, good work furry m8!

  • @johnfrancisterne1072
    @johnfrancisterne1072 3 роки тому

    I think we should add that performing a deadstick landing in the F-100 has a possibility of you running into a hangar wall

  • @PapaFaust
    @PapaFaust 3 роки тому

    F-100A (like the one in chinese tt or french one) do indeed suffer from pitch increases, but not the F-100D, as it has been modified with leading-edge slats on its wings in order to help it with its unsafe charactaristic.

  • @Flyguy4500
    @Flyguy4500 3 роки тому

    Please do more historically accurate for planes

  • @zoojuice7893
    @zoojuice7893 3 роки тому

    Moving on to planes I see

  • @russianoldschoo48
    @russianoldschoo48 3 роки тому +1

    If f100 was historically accurate:
    NUCLEAR BOMB

  • @Osean_Kitty
    @Osean_Kitty 3 роки тому

    yay! more historically accurate vids!

  • @sunzoo7173
    @sunzoo7173 3 роки тому

    nefore the video starts ill mention sabre dance as a huge roll

  • @quakethedoombringer
    @quakethedoombringer Рік тому

    The alert siren sounds kinda good ngl

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 3 роки тому

    Great series

  • @Raul_Menendez
    @Raul_Menendez 3 роки тому

    Another fact: They can be seen in Rivers as baby F-100 without wings before being fished by fishermen.

  • @HaloFan577
    @HaloFan577 3 роки тому

    YES! Been waiting for accurate jets

  • @blacktigerace6687
    @blacktigerace6687 3 роки тому

    F100s - flying
    wings : " *alright, imma head out* "

  • @kevinhatcher3765
    @kevinhatcher3765 3 роки тому

    I always wondered why the F-100 had so many accidents during the Vietnam war I can get an idea of the reasons now

  • @rapha3828
    @rapha3828 3 роки тому

    More vídeos of aircraft cuz its very Nice

  • @terrado6746
    @terrado6746 3 роки тому

    From a dedicated WT pilot: Nice vid 👍🏻

  • @digitaldash222
    @digitaldash222 3 роки тому

    You should do more planes!

  • @TheAmazingCowpig
    @TheAmazingCowpig 3 роки тому

    Gotta say, with the easy wing structural failures you can already experience with the F-100D in-game, it's feeling pretty historically accurate! As for directional stability, I'm sure Gaijin would love to give F-100As the Corsair treatment and make the rudder worthless...
    also bad combustion chamber alignment is just not having researched any of the engine upgrades

  • @owosatan8864
    @owosatan8864 3 роки тому +2

    I’m glad he’s doing aircraft’s aswell as tanks makes the content better than it already is

  • @mhd.zaidan
    @mhd.zaidan 3 роки тому

    1:13 i like how the face is just like :0

  • @engineermerasmus2810
    @engineermerasmus2810 3 роки тому

    Yes do more planes! As they not being historically accurate is much more important....

  • @biga5227
    @biga5227 3 роки тому +1

    “Historical accuracy? What’s that?” - *Gaijin*

  • @madkabal
    @madkabal 3 роки тому

    This occurred on a lot of planes that were built, There are always a lot of problems on complicated fighter planes sometimes problems are never resolved in the Air Force and navy just learn to deal with them. that's why the F35 being perceived as a "failure" simply because it's under a media microscope is ridiculous.

  • @phased-arraych.9150
    @phased-arraych.9150 3 роки тому

    The F-100s had an insane amount of problems and technical issues. It was also dangerous to fly due to the aforementioned instability at low speeds.

  • @meesguyy
    @meesguyy 3 роки тому +2

    can we have if the spitfire series was historically accurate

  • @MCF2233
    @MCF2233 3 роки тому

    Good video overall, but why was a stability issue from the smaller vert stab on the F-100A included in a video about the F-100D?

    • @martijn9568
      @martijn9568 3 роки тому

      Well, ehm. The Chinese F-100As are F-100As updated to F-100D standards, except for the wings.
      That's about as close as I could get, but I'm guessing Spookston is trying to prevent comments with obvious mistakes of other variants.

  • @elijaha773
    @elijaha773 3 роки тому

    I love the music!

  • @amaterasu_eyes3486
    @amaterasu_eyes3486 3 роки тому

    The instability issues at low speeds were corrected in the D model by adding the structures on the wings, due to the amount of deaths by the so called “saber dance” in the previous iterations of the F100

    • @martijn9568
      @martijn9568 3 роки тому +1

      Sounds kinda hard to solve considering that the Sabre dance is more or less a consequence of the outer wing stalling before the inner wing due to the nature of highly swept wings.

    • @amaterasu_eyes3486
      @amaterasu_eyes3486 3 роки тому

      @@martijn9568 The so called "Saber Dance" was caused by airflow from the wing sweep like you said . They resolved this by increasing the wingspan and adding the fins(not sure of the technical term) on the wings, as well as changing the rudder slightly. The problem still existed, however the speed margins improved drastically.

  • @francescorapana3949
    @francescorapana3949 3 роки тому

    It's strange that it didn't has transimission problems

  • @IMCgrunt543
    @IMCgrunt543 3 роки тому

    Video idea: all you need is a L3/33

  • @Shadowhunterbg
    @Shadowhunterbg 3 роки тому

    F100D in this game gave me the best jet experience i ever had. I only want my jet to be strong in at least one thing to keep my alive and being the fastest bird did just that. That was before though. Before the Dark Times, Before the BR changes.

  • @nakoete8521
    @nakoete8521 3 роки тому

    1:11
    Gaijin: “more expensive, you say?”

  • @eric_moto8878
    @eric_moto8878 3 роки тому

    Spookstoon video exists.
    Everything: breaks down

  • @alexanderfrancois6868
    @alexanderfrancois6868 3 роки тому +4

    Can we get if the KA family was historically accurate?

  • @Pointclearius
    @Pointclearius 3 роки тому +1

    Id love to start my own games development comapny and then hire people like spookston to research the hell out of vehicles for our games so we can actually make them accurate

  • @brecibros2469
    @brecibros2469 3 роки тому

    next video if the warthunder f4 phantom was historically accurate

  • @cefalopodo5717
    @cefalopodo5717 3 роки тому +3

    "small chance of disintegrating" lol

  • @vikingsoftomorrow4038
    @vikingsoftomorrow4038 3 роки тому

    Surprised not to see anything regarding the French having the F-100D or its payload options. Would think that a French F-100D would have some native weapon systems mounted to it or at least the same weaponry as the American one.

  • @psychozero1173
    @psychozero1173 3 роки тому

    O i love the vacuum on the f100s nose

  • @theallmightyego6756
    @theallmightyego6756 3 роки тому

    Next if the Strv 103 was historically accurate

  • @michaelstodovski2219
    @michaelstodovski2219 3 роки тому +1

    Do more aviation videos!!

  • @lea-lj8jl
    @lea-lj8jl 3 роки тому

    you should do the A-4 Skyhawk !

  • @thomasprice2457
    @thomasprice2457 3 роки тому

    Well done!

  • @liambryant4953
    @liambryant4953 2 роки тому +1

    1:15
    Please, Don't make Gaijin increase silver lion costs. I'm just short of declaring bankruptcy as it is

  • @locke8628
    @locke8628 3 роки тому

    I want to meet the genius that had the idea to give a plane which could crash upon take off and landing, can disintegrate at high speeds and also had a small chance to spin uncontrollably mid-flight NUCLEAR MUNITIONS

  • @mizuki3316
    @mizuki3316 3 роки тому

    0:13 R.I.P. Mr. Pilot

  • @victoriousv5565
    @victoriousv5565 3 роки тому

    Mig-21s next pls

  • @carl5381
    @carl5381 3 роки тому

    The F100 can be sent into an uncontrollable spin while flying at low speeds with full fuel. Kind of like oh i dunno any plane ever.

  • @planlos3153
    @planlos3153 3 роки тому

    And don't forget. It never even shot down a single plane during its service, giving it higher SL and RP gain :)

  • @Godofchaosdragons
    @Godofchaosdragons 3 роки тому

    You know I’ve always wondered what Napalm would to do a tank I doubt it would kill the crew right off the bat but it would be able to destroy the engine and eventually cook the people inside maybe. Anyone have any ideas

  • @covenantslayergaming6362
    @covenantslayergaming6362 3 роки тому +1

    if the f-100d had half of the features proposed here, maybe it wouldn't suck as much in-game compared to other contemporaries