If War Thunder's F-89 Scorpion was historically accurate

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Conceptualized in the 1940s and created / used during the 1950s, the F-89 Scorpion was a US all-weather jet interceptor. The Scorpion, designed by Northrop Grumman, first flew in 1948. Early versions experienced considerable issues. Most notably, they had severe issues with aerodynamics and engine performance. Eventually these issues were ironed out with later variants like the F-89D. The F-89D was armed entirely with air to air rockets, and would eventually be used to test guided air to air missiles. As newer jet interceptors became available, F-89s were transferred to air national guard units where they were used in service until 1969.
    Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
    Songs used (in order from first to last):
    Halo: CE - Perilous Journey
    Halo 3: ODST - Rain (Deference for Darkness)
    Sources:
    F-89 In Detail - Bert Kinzey
    F-89 Scorpion - Gerald Balzer
    OP 2210 Aircraft Rockets
    Battle of Palmdale
    USAF Flight Handbook for the F-89D
    USAF Handbook of Flight Operating Instructions for the F-89B
    Second channel: / @spookstoon
    Patreon: www.patreon.co...
    Twitter: / spookston
    Reddit: /u/spookston
    Discord: / discord
    Twitch: / spookstonwt
    Steam: goo.gl/BYQjC9
    #tanks #tankhistory #warthunder

КОМЕНТАРІ • 324

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims 3 роки тому +312

    “If vehicle was accurate:”
    *Vehicle exploding/exploded*

    • @mierzhen
      @mierzhen 3 роки тому +10

      "If air vehicle was accurate:"
      *Wing shears off due to instability*
      *Bullet holes spawn out of nowhere*

    • @lfraser7128
      @lfraser7128 3 роки тому

      If only they made the mosquito accurate, then it would be faster, more agile, have a bigger bomb load, and be less likely to go up in flames.

  • @squillz8310
    @squillz8310 3 роки тому +233

    That Hellcat joke was great. That'd be a hilarious Easter egg if it was in the game

    • @m.c.schock2933
      @m.c.schock2933 3 роки тому +6

      I don't get the joke?

    • @warbirdgaming8091
      @warbirdgaming8091 3 роки тому +11

      @@m.c.schock2933 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Palmdale

    • @wana7668
      @wana7668 3 роки тому +37

      @@m.c.schock2933 Search up the Battle of Palmdale
      In short an f89 couldn't shoot down a runaway hellcat drone

    • @napalm5941
      @napalm5941 3 роки тому +1

      @@m.c.schock2933 ua-cam.com/video/yipdlyF9HP0/v-deo.html
      Really good youtuber (in case you dont know him) and video better than reading. 😜

    • @squillz8310
      @squillz8310 3 роки тому +1

      @@m.c.schock2933 i forget the year but sometime in california an F6F Hellcat drone went rogue (lost radio signal) and so 2 F-89's were scrambled to intercept it and shoot it down. Neither plane hit the Drone with any of their rockets.

  • @galis4383
    @galis4383 3 роки тому +856

    If Scorpion was historically accurate:
    Players are unable to deploy the plane in any kind of battle because pilots simply refuse to fly them on account that it's a piece of garbage

    • @risu6894
      @risu6894 3 роки тому +41

      at least its not the F-84

    • @willasproth
      @willasproth 3 роки тому +31

      @@risu6894 the f-84 was great stfu

    • @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757
      @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757 3 роки тому +34

      @@willasproth it made ground crews sick from the sound and knocked the crew on the ground from the sonic boom given off by the turboprop spinning over mach 1
      Before you go liking shit and shaming anyone who says different, do research

    • @lirimturkaj2055
      @lirimturkaj2055 3 роки тому +96

      @@politicallyinaccuratetoast4757 oh, you are thinking anout the XF-84H, not the regualr F-84

    • @Alldaboss
      @Alldaboss 3 роки тому +5

      @@lirimturkaj2055 easy to get the two confused

  • @jlcritch3718
    @jlcritch3718 3 роки тому +323

    This comes out the minute I decide to start playing the F89. Now I dont want to.

    • @FirstDagger
      @FirstDagger 3 роки тому +25

      You should have known before you bought it that the radio fuzes for the Scorpion are utterly ahistorical.

    • @AttiliusRex
      @AttiliusRex 3 роки тому +12

      @@FirstDagger so F89 gets radio fuzes altough unhistorical, while draken and lansen doesnt, even though jrak 75mm with radio fuze was part of the main armament, and favoured over rb24

    • @FirstDagger
      @FirstDagger 3 роки тому +7

      @@AttiliusRex ; Jep, Gaijin is always half-assing things.

    • @AmericanIdiot7659
      @AmericanIdiot7659 3 роки тому +1

      @@FirstDagger hey that's what my mother told me

    • @StressfulGengar
      @StressfulGengar 3 роки тому

      The Scorpion is past it's prime as a good plane. I used it when it was and it got me the entire American tech tree 🤣

  • @PilotTed
    @PilotTed 3 роки тому +701

    Lol, loved the Battle of Palmdale joke XD.

    • @grandmoffrex
      @grandmoffrex 3 роки тому +3

      When?

    • @a-h1n286
      @a-h1n286 3 роки тому +162

      @@grandmoffrex in 1956 an f-89 failed to shoot down a runaway f6f drone

    • @TheKurtkapan34
      @TheKurtkapan34 3 роки тому +188

      @@a-h1n286 not one. 2 f-89s, apparently used all their rockets but failed to down the drone, and obliterated about 1000 acres of farmland in the process.
      "It took 500 firefighters two days to bring the brushfires under control. 1,000 acres (400 ha) were burned."
      'murica!

    • @jandajanda2242
      @jandajanda2242 3 роки тому +37

      @@TheKurtkapan34 It’s because they had neither guns or gun sights Only rockets Which are not as good for air to air combat

    • @mEmEzMaN...
      @mEmEzMaN... 3 роки тому +16

      @@TheKurtkapan34 416 rockets total i believe and not one hit

  • @thatsidewaysdud7623
    @thatsidewaysdud7623 3 роки тому +384

    Most importantly:
    It doesn't get to club Me 262's.

    • @risu6894
      @risu6894 3 роки тому +36

      no because if it doesnt then germany doesnt suffer which means no 2a7 )))))

    • @andym.s.5231
      @andym.s.5231 3 роки тому

      @@risu6894 hahahah

    • @dunamoose3446
      @dunamoose3446 3 роки тому +1

      @@risu6894 ))))))))))))))))))))

    • @iota515
      @iota515 3 роки тому +2

      @@risu6894 if they add 2A7 they're gonna give it hull armor of T-34 WITHOUT the drivers hatch

    • @PorWik
      @PorWik 3 роки тому

      @Hans Blitzkrieg I mean isn’t the last T72 from 2016

  • @evertenplaza3673
    @evertenplaza3673 3 роки тому +266

    If the Scorpion was historically accurate:
    Players would be able to research the AIR-2 Genie missile, an air to air unguided nuclear warhead

    • @williamgandarillas2185
      @williamgandarillas2185 3 роки тому +29

      “Balance”

    • @evertenplaza3673
      @evertenplaza3673 3 роки тому +37

      @@williamgandarillas2185 I mean basically every guided missile in this game goes off with the same chances of survival, so its not that big of a balance shift hahahah

    • @humzaakhtar9208
      @humzaakhtar9208 3 роки тому +10

      Explain to me why the FUCK would you need a NUCLEAR air to air missile? What kind of over kill is that?

    • @lilsleepy1969
      @lilsleepy1969 3 роки тому +2

      @@humzaakhtar9208 because

    • @evertenplaza3673
      @evertenplaza3673 3 роки тому +23

      @@humzaakhtar9208 the reason they were designing it was because the earlier unguided rocket systems proved to be highly inaccurate. At the time guided rockets were extremely primitive, and the need to attack from beyond defense gun range was a necessity.
      The blast radius of the warhead, actually, was roughly 300m. In fact, I would say that given the limitations, and the stakes of not intercepting a nuclear bomber formation, it was actually a fairly reasonable solution.

  • @Shinzon23
    @Shinzon23 3 роки тому +182

    "If the scorpion was historically accurate"
    *Immediately starts off with the Scorpion on fire and having ripped its wings*
    Off to a roaring start!

    • @Shinzon23
      @Shinzon23 3 роки тому +3

      @Rafael Enriquez but since it's a plane you can show that its ultra fraked by also showing it having ripped its wings AND on fire!

  • @adalsev8518
    @adalsev8518 3 роки тому +139

    Surprised you didn't include the possibility of mounting AIR-2 Genie Missiles.

    • @adalsev8518
      @adalsev8518 3 роки тому +27

      @Ronan McDonald What do you mean an unguided missile carrying a nuclear warhead with a yield of one kiloton of TNT is a bit too much?

    • @furrytimelord
      @furrytimelord 3 роки тому +7

      That would be fun

    • @pablosturm6640
      @pablosturm6640 3 роки тому +3

      That is one good profile pic. A man of culture to be sure. Also, gaijin pls gib A2A nuke

  • @thefuzzyvulpine5945
    @thefuzzyvulpine5945 3 роки тому +45

    0:38
    Ah, yes, the Battle of Palmdale. I think the entire event was utterly comical.

  • @youraveragescotsman7119
    @youraveragescotsman7119 3 роки тому +19

    "Early Scorpions had ineffective engines"
    *Every plane to ever exist:* Welcome to the club.

  • @jacobscott1433
    @jacobscott1433 3 роки тому +90

    I SHALL NOT REST UNTIL I END AN ENTIRE GROUND RB MATCH WITH A GENIE

    • @jamesburdian56
      @jamesburdian56 Рік тому +2

      A genie is an air to air nuclear rocket lmao

  • @teawiththeadmiral8025
    @teawiththeadmiral8025 3 роки тому +176

    Wrong wrong wrong, haven't you read the sekrit dokuments komrade? Now go buy ka50 and t72 turms )))))) xaxaxa

    • @skl-1371
      @skl-1371 3 роки тому +7

      Yeah unless you are keen of playing a MiG-15 burst a G.91 taking a wing off & he crashes without being awarded a kill, happened 3 times in a row.

    • @skl-1371
      @skl-1371 3 роки тому

      @Hans Blitzkrieg It literally keep happening even with my teammates finishing them after I do crit them give no assist, like what !?, Am I not allowed to spade/research air in mixed battles!.

  • @thegenericguy8309
    @thegenericguy8309 3 роки тому +7

    If LaGG-3 were historically accurate would be a fun one

  • @deliqene3191
    @deliqene3191 3 роки тому +20

    >F-89 historically accurate in War Thunder
    Easy to answer, the servers would crash cause 7.7 would be like the end of Far Cry 5

    • @randomt-9034
      @randomt-9034 3 роки тому

      *The enemy team has lost all of its vehicles.

  • @jirihorsky9600
    @jirihorsky9600 3 роки тому +39

    Please do not tell Gaijin that F-89D had a bunch of guided AAM. They WILL include it and not change a BR at the same time.

    • @FirstDagger
      @FirstDagger 3 роки тому +12

      AIM-4 Falcon was a pretty shitty missile though, even AIM-9Bs were superior which is why Phantoms switched to the later, although it being a Navy weapon.

    • @jirihorsky9600
      @jirihorsky9600 3 роки тому +2

      @@FirstDagger True.
      Also that means absolutley nothing since we are talking about Gaijin here.

    • @gaiofattos2
      @gaiofattos2 3 роки тому +1

      sad sea hawnk noises ...

    • @naamadossantossilva4736
      @naamadossantossilva4736 3 роки тому +5

      Don't worry,the F-89 isn't russian.

    • @bossplayerunit4563
      @bossplayerunit4563 3 роки тому +4

      they didnt even get missiles until the F-89J, had spook actually read the manual he cited, he would know this

  • @2Potates
    @2Potates 3 роки тому +50

    Think we'll ever get the air-to-air nuclear missiles?

  • @AltaKingGames
    @AltaKingGames 3 роки тому +19

    Make a "If WT F-4 Phantom was historicaly accurate"

  • @patton333
    @patton333 3 роки тому +8

    Do a video on the absurdity of the F-89C please! 12x 30mm cannons that fire the same ammunition as the A-10, and with a combined total of 4x the fire rate. I can provide sources if you need them.

    • @taki0ps230
      @taki0ps230 9 місяців тому

      no version with 12 30mm was created, a version with 4 30mm was on the other hand. the ammunition is also different to that of the a-10

  • @mouser7436
    @mouser7436 3 роки тому +13

    If the amx-13 was historically accurate

  • @LazOyuncu61
    @LazOyuncu61 3 роки тому +8

    It’s fire control system also fail while engaging F6F Hellcats.

  • @corrodan2995
    @corrodan2995 3 роки тому +3

    Forgot to mention that since F89 was produced in mass with over 1,000 being built there should be a tech tree variant as well. :P

  • @Skoodelly
    @Skoodelly 3 роки тому +4

    Remember when Spookston made the "if the me 163 was historically accurately video"? Well he convinced gaijin to add the explosion on runway fact...

  • @ChurchRvB117
    @ChurchRvB117 3 роки тому +9

    wh-where’s the broken transmission?

  • @Roope00
    @Roope00 3 роки тому +7

    1:28 Oh no, don't give Gaijin any ideas.

  • @generalsquirrel9548
    @generalsquirrel9548 3 роки тому +6

    The first thingy engine die mid air also implies for litterally every german ww2 jet because of lack of heat resistancing material

    • @tirpitz177
      @tirpitz177 3 роки тому +1

      Pretty much

    • @F4Wildcat
      @F4Wildcat 3 роки тому +3

      Dont make the german fanboys cry. Remember. Nothing defeats the me262. Nothing defeats the Kingtiger

    • @generalsquirrel9548
      @generalsquirrel9548 3 роки тому +1

      @@F4Wildcat lol

    • @pablosturm6640
      @pablosturm6640 3 роки тому

      Well, they still flew. And shot down lotsa stuff, as they were intended to do, engine issues notwithstanding. Only started to get shat upon once they got converted to fighter-bombers and the brits/americans got round to building better engines for their piston fighters. Much like the german heavy tanks which were hard to stop if used adequately, most of the issues didnt matter as much once the things actually hit the field. I mean, you can point out all the issues of the tigers but you still wouldnt want to be on the receiving end once they were in the field cause they could mulch most allied equivalents, design issues notwithstanding. To clarify, im not saying that german engineering in WW2 was perfect or superior but it sure did its job when it counted the most, german defeat was down to strategic decisions/circumstance/disadvantages moreso than technological inferiority.

    • @F4Wildcat
      @F4Wildcat 3 роки тому

      @@pablosturm6640 well yeah but you talk about 1 area where a tiger in perfect conditions MIGHT wreck alot of shermans and then we have 100 areas where we dont have any tigers and the germans get wrecked...
      Same with ME 262. it shot down bombers. But to few. And made no impact on the war itself.

  • @thundermite1241
    @thundermite1241 3 роки тому +5

    Id like to see the xf 84h thunderscreech added

    • @finkyfamboni4333
      @finkyfamboni4333 3 роки тому +5

      and all it does is deafen every player in a 10 kilometer radius

    • @thundermite1241
      @thundermite1241 3 роки тому +4

      @@finkyfamboni4333 thats its passive ability

    • @mfree80286
      @mfree80286 3 роки тому +1

      @@thundermite1241 Defeats inbound missiles by vibrating their electronics apart before they're within detonation range....

  • @wattpwn
    @wattpwn 3 роки тому +1

    Love to see this series open up to aircraft. Keep up your excellent work, Spooks!

  • @dominicgorriceta6487
    @dominicgorriceta6487 3 роки тому +1

    F-89D: I fear no plane, but that thing,
    0:41
    *It scares me.*

  • @mattbremer7754
    @mattbremer7754 3 роки тому +8

    As a avrage F 89D user this hurts me in the feels

    • @generalsquirrel9548
      @generalsquirrel9548 3 роки тому

      Me 262 better my engine dies faster irl

    • @mattbremer7754
      @mattbremer7754 3 роки тому +1

      @@generalsquirrel9548 well...its a jumo engine

    • @Maverick966
      @Maverick966 3 роки тому +1

      Don't listen him, the F-89D was designed with rockets with proximity fuse in mind, the XM439 rocket was a prototype tested with F-89D

    • @TheGunner066
      @TheGunner066 3 роки тому +1

      @@Maverick966 M439 is for cargo rounds. Flechete and Multi-Purpose SubMunition (cluster rockets) You don't use it on HE heads.

    • @MandolinMagi
      @MandolinMagi 3 роки тому

      @@Maverick966 No it was not. No evidence of said claims have ever been found. M439 didn't exist until the 1970s and was an Army exclusive. It isn't even compatible with HE heads!

  • @thorshammer7883
    @thorshammer7883 3 роки тому +8

    Spookston can you do a video about the M145D Rhino Tank *[Halo Wars 1]* vs the Terran Crucio Siege Tank *[Starcraft]?*

  • @nathanielkimmel7163
    @nathanielkimmel7163 3 роки тому +2

    Whenever I see the f-89 I just think “chumby”

  • @coolbeams6885
    @coolbeams6885 3 роки тому +17

    0:40 lmao

    • @user75492
      @user75492 3 роки тому +2

      I really do not get it please explain

    • @user75492
      @user75492 3 роки тому

      @@positiveanion4085 very helpful thanks

  • @samspeed6271
    @samspeed6271 3 роки тому +1

    You know what would make this thing a madly overpowered jet? Give it the AIR-2 Genie nuclear air to air rocket. The F-89J, which was a modified F-89D, could carry the Genie and 4 AIM-4 Falcons.

  • @clemencejg_br2724
    @clemencejg_br2724 3 роки тому +1

    These videos are incredible and very informative, I love them, keep up the good work! : D

  • @capitalistpig1115
    @capitalistpig1115 3 роки тому +1

    would literally die for more aircraft vids pls more

  • @Bacn8rsupreme
    @Bacn8rsupreme 3 роки тому +3

    Could we see an m18 hellcat episode in the future?

  • @kibble9101
    @kibble9101 3 роки тому +1

    finally a vehicle without suspension, transmission, or gearbox failure

  • @HAUNEV
    @HAUNEV 3 роки тому

    F-89D: _literally flying_
    *Its modifications: ight imma head out*

  • @lukehenry6712
    @lukehenry6712 3 роки тому +1

    Just bought the 89B to grind out the Harrier and other high tier muricans and I have to say, I absolutely love it to death. It’s so great in my opinion, but I have no desire to buy the 89D. Great video boss.

  • @tankfighter2767
    @tankfighter2767 3 роки тому

    I was pleasantly surprised, there were some positive attributes in addition to the normal million problems!

  • @TaintedMojo
    @TaintedMojo 3 роки тому +1

    “Your wings just may fall off”

  • @VivyX2
    @VivyX2 3 роки тому

    The failure to shoot down the hellcat joke was much appreciated

  • @mouser7436
    @mouser7436 3 роки тому +1

    This is an early jet so I'm happy

  • @metal-0118
    @metal-0118 3 роки тому

    You know these are always very informative to watch thanks and keep up the hard work

  • @b3chtl
    @b3chtl 3 роки тому

    but in war thunder you can imagine that every plane and tank works like in a perfect world situation

  • @maverick740
    @maverick740 3 роки тому +4

    can ya give us m103? please

  • @GavinTheFifer
    @GavinTheFifer 3 роки тому

    Hell yeah, more aircraft videos like this

  • @UnclePutte
    @UnclePutte 3 роки тому

    Jeezus the wing wobble looks scrote-twistingly painful even in WT.

  • @RealNotallGaming
    @RealNotallGaming 3 роки тому

    Fantastic as always

  • @bilge677
    @bilge677 3 роки тому

    i love the new wing shaking, bending and flexing they added. definitely one of the better decisions of gaijin

  • @build2270
    @build2270 3 роки тому +10

    0:40 Hey Spookston, is this for when they were testing the rockets?
    Like were there actual enemy F6Fs? Or was it testing.
    Alos why would the rockets behave weirdly against only this kind of airplane?

    • @DaFlyboy
      @DaFlyboy 3 роки тому +12

      I believe it happened because a hellcat went rogue and a few F-89s were sent to intercept the pilotless plane only for the rockets to not hit their target

    • @4263-b5v
      @4263-b5v 3 роки тому +3

      build22 they were made into drones to test weapons on.

    • @evanchan4012
      @evanchan4012 3 роки тому +6

      So this F6F target drone went rouge and was not responding to controls from the ground so they sent out 2 F-89D’s which fired all their rockets but missed all of them

    • @scarecrow443
      @scarecrow443 3 роки тому

      War Thunder actually made a video about this, but i can't remember what episode it was for the shooting range.

    • @stortroopers
      @stortroopers 3 роки тому +3

      As others said, the F6F was being used as an unmanned target drone but it stopped responding to control inputs from the ground. Two F-89s got scrambled to intercept it, but their automatic fire control systems stopped working. The sights the planes once had for manual aiming had been removed because they were only meant to be fired with the help of the fire control system. So, with no real way to aim the missiles other than guesstimation, and with about 30-40/100 rockets being fired per salvo, each Scorpion only had three unguided and unaimed shots at the F6F. All the rockets missed, set off a few bushfires and caused some property damage, but thankfully there were no injuries or casualties.

  • @jeffreyheffrey9505
    @jeffreyheffrey9505 3 роки тому

    Love the vid, been watching other ones. I hope you can make one on the F86

  • @vonschleppin
    @vonschleppin 2 роки тому

    If looks alone made the plane the F89 would be a super bad ass. The truth is the scorpion was a pathfinder vehicle into the jet age, more of “what not to do” was learned than anything else.

  • @badeshka4143
    @badeshka4143 3 роки тому

    the music fits perfectly for this aircraft :)

  • @dixievfd55
    @dixievfd55 3 роки тому

    F3-H Demon next. That thing was prone to compressor stalls and was known as a pilot killer.

  • @Maverick966
    @Maverick966 3 роки тому +1

    They were not in service but they were tested with the F-89D, both the F-89D and the XM439 were prototypes, the F-89D was designed with rockets with proximity fuse in mind

    • @southernbear736
      @southernbear736 3 роки тому

      Only 1 fixed wing aircraft was ever cleared to use the VT fuse rockets and that was the Bronco. The F-89s only ever had impact HE

    • @Maverick966
      @Maverick966 3 роки тому +1

      @@southernbear736 False, an F-89D was tested with XM439 proximity fuse rockets at China Lake in 1956, USA already had proximity fuse projectiles in service in 1942

    • @MandolinMagi
      @MandolinMagi 3 роки тому

      @@Maverick966 That's false, the mods claimed that and then never provided any evidence. M439 is an Army project from the 1970s. Also, M439 is not proximity, it's time fuzed. M429 is proximity, is also an Army exclusive, and blows up if you fire more than one at a time.

  • @etitsmo7603
    @etitsmo7603 3 роки тому

    Does this mean there will be more what if WarThunder's aircraft are historically accurate? *POG*

  • @CollinTheSav
    @CollinTheSav 3 роки тому

    Tfw you get a new Historically Accurate video on your feed: *meme from movie with Kronk*

  • @redbaronace19
    @redbaronace19 3 роки тому

    I’ve watched so many of these to the point where I’m starting to think if everything was historically accurate in war thunder everything would have a bunch of flaws

  • @titanic_monarch796
    @titanic_monarch796 3 роки тому +1

    I would love to see you cover the problems with fictional aircraft, since you seem to be more familiar with aircraft now.

  • @kamerona4723
    @kamerona4723 3 роки тому +2

    isnt this the plane with the air to air nuclear missiles

  • @OdysseyFox
    @OdysseyFox 3 роки тому

    I never knew it was called the Scorpion, I see why though, it looks like one! I love the looks of the F-89

  • @Shmak1
    @Shmak1 3 роки тому

    This is like the forgotten weapons of vehicles.

  • @dmdj8588
    @dmdj8588 3 роки тому

    F-89D used their radar scope as a gunsight. That's why the meme of battle of palmdale happened.
    Annnd F-89D with GAR-1 was different variant, F-89J.

  • @leeboy29680-ol7gf
    @leeboy29680-ol7gf 3 роки тому

    2:10 remember when a half damaged plane could be left damaged and taken into the next game with the damage? that was some early shit.

  • @jeffreyskoritowski4114
    @jeffreyskoritowski4114 3 роки тому

    If the Scorpion was "historically accurate" it wouldn't be engaging in maneuvering combat.

  • @bamboozlednoodle6513
    @bamboozlednoodle6513 3 роки тому +3

    Ooooh planes

  • @Failsafe31
    @Failsafe31 3 роки тому

    I like flying the plane in game since I live in Idaho and just a little ways away from where I live, nampa has Idaho air national guard F89D's on display in a local park.

  • @talioli1666
    @talioli1666 3 роки тому

    Would like to see a video covering heli ec and its problems

  • @covenantslayergaming6362
    @covenantslayergaming6362 3 роки тому

    You forgot that the f-89 should be able to damage any bases near or within heavily forested land when engaging F6F's due to wildfires. The bases would eventually burn out

  • @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757
    @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757 3 роки тому

    The only reason I like the F89B is because it's the closest gaijin has to an A-10 fire-rate-wise

  • @widesherman2337
    @widesherman2337 3 роки тому +2

    0:45 lmao

  • @bossplayerunit4563
    @bossplayerunit4563 3 роки тому +3

    no, the F-89D did not get missiles of any kind, had you actually read the manual you cited, you would know this
    to find the actual armament of the F-89D, refer to section 4, page 45 of the F-89D operations manual (4-45)
    edit: your own book that YOU REFERENCED even mentioned that a single 89D was used as a test bed, and only the 89H onwards had missiles

    • @Spookston
      @Spookston  3 роки тому +2

      If you had read the book I cited, you would know that F-89Ds were used to test the armament concept for the F-89H, meaning that the F-89H could be a researchable modification for the F-89D, considering it was nearly identical to the F-89D.

    • @POKEMANZZ3
      @POKEMANZZ3 3 роки тому +2

      @@Spookston 89H was new production and had a new fire control system. your source says that its only provisions added for it on the 89D, they wernt installed
      89J would be more valid here, all 89Js where modified Ds however again FCS changed.
      Ds did not carry GAR-1s operationally, they shouldnt in game

    • @Spookston
      @Spookston  3 роки тому +3

      Yes, new fire control system and different weapons. That means otherwise identical. It's just being pedantic. This type of point (where a modification changes one vehicle to a different variant) is not new to my videos.

    • @POKEMANZZ3
      @POKEMANZZ3 3 роки тому +2

      @@Spookston outside of the airframe they aren't identical, also then don't say the 89D can fire GAR-1s, say the 89D can be set as an 89H/J. the 89D cannot use them
      also no it isn't being pedantic, there's a reason these aircraft have different designations, stuff changes between them namely in this case the fire control equipment, the 89H introduced the E-9 fire control system, whos primary change being that it has the subsystems necessary to utilize guided missiles, the 89Ds E-6 system does not and so it cannot fire them. this is ignoring all the various related switches that the 89D is missing to use them.

    • @bossplayerunit4563
      @bossplayerunit4563 3 роки тому +2

      @@Spookston seconding ​ @Yukari
      additionally, by your own logic, the F-89D is redundant and can just be a modification of the F-89B, since if we oversimplify it as you have, they are essentially the same, just with different armament, and for that matter, many other aircraft, tanks, ships, and helicopters in this game can be removed and their previous variants have modifications added to them
      as i mentioned in another thread, its not as simple as just putting the new armament onto the aircraft, a lot more goes into it than that, especially with guided missiles, coupling this fact with aim-4s not being usable with F-89D's computers, making your whole pedantics argument complete nonsense

  • @Zretgul_timerunner
    @Zretgul_timerunner 3 роки тому

    Nice always great to have your main propulsion unit just die midflight...

  • @sarttee
    @sarttee 3 роки тому

    You should do a video : " If any US Vehicle in warthunder was historically accurate "

  • @Archid11
    @Archid11 3 роки тому

    Even knowing that it is a plane i was still expecting to see "transmission breakdown". But we got engine failure so i guess it's fine, eh?

  • @thisguyyyyyyy2723
    @thisguyyyyyyy2723 3 роки тому

    What about the M24A1 cannons on the F-89B having a rate of fire far exceeding what they historically had? They’re derived from Hispano cannons yet act like they’re revolver cannons.

  • @crashingpowerz8324
    @crashingpowerz8324 3 роки тому

    0:39 nice joke- def necessary for this!
    Not being sarcastic, I really got a laugh from that!

  • @8076A
    @8076A 3 роки тому +1

    What no researchable nuclear rocket?

  • @chinglegitrdx6135
    @chinglegitrdx6135 3 роки тому

    "Early F-89Bs could disintergrate mid-flight due to aerodynamic twisting of the wings"
    What, you mean they don't ingame?

  • @oliestarkyshitposting5647
    @oliestarkyshitposting5647 3 роки тому +1

    Wait, how come the rocktets have worse dispersion when firing at F6F Hellcats?

    • @snaketanker
      @snaketanker 3 роки тому +2

      Look up battle of Palmdale. There was two F-89s that couldn’t take down a runaway F6F drone.

  • @nanochad2979
    @nanochad2979 3 роки тому +1

    lol love the hellcat joke

  • @Bang-Ai146
    @Bang-Ai146 3 роки тому

    0:30
    This is what's make you lose wing when use this plane. I thought this plane was OP

  • @Gigitygigity24
    @Gigitygigity24 3 роки тому +1

    You've got a hole in your left wing!

  • @luggilu7864
    @luggilu7864 3 роки тому

    Oh hes evolving

  • @jaystar526
    @jaystar526 3 роки тому

    Nice video
    Also nice profile pic

  • @shepherdlavellen3301
    @shepherdlavellen3301 3 роки тому

    if any war thunder aircraft is realistic, they would have much less thrust to weight ratio, no automatic IFF, much fewer G tolerance and close to zero negative G tolerance, and no fly by wire system

  • @janwolski4653
    @janwolski4653 3 роки тому

    Can we get more such a video?

  • @clevernamegotban1752
    @clevernamegotban1752 3 роки тому +1

    So one of the main reaosn the F89D was and still is broken the proximity Fuze rockets, it historically shouldn't have access to? Lol oh gaijin

    • @naamadossantossilva4736
      @naamadossantossilva4736 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah,replace that with the historically accurate Genie.

    • @shanechambers9529
      @shanechambers9529 3 роки тому +1

      Well they could've added air to air unguided nukes (AIR-2 genie) or AIM-4 falcon air to air guided missiles if you rather that. They actually nerfed the plane for "balance" in WT. Remember that next time you want to cry about it.

  • @lemonylemon2289
    @lemonylemon2289 3 роки тому

    More early jets please

  • @yaffajaff
    @yaffajaff 3 роки тому

    Get clear, Chief!

  • @filipvonhohenburg3550
    @filipvonhohenburg3550 3 роки тому

    Finally an airplane review. Thanks!

  • @CRIMSON20636
    @CRIMSON20636 3 роки тому

    can you do "if War Thunder's F6F Hellcat was historically accurate"

  • @robertphillips1145
    @robertphillips1145 3 роки тому

    If the video's creator knew about the F-89...

  • @SpetsnazCCCP
    @SpetsnazCCCP 3 роки тому

    Great video! How about Yak 23?

  • @rockguy2154
    @rockguy2154 3 роки тому

    new spookston vid poggies

  • @kevinhatcher3765
    @kevinhatcher3765 3 роки тому

    I see what you did there with the F6F

  • @nanoatic
    @nanoatic 3 роки тому

    0:39 Nice one xD

  • @tsilfidis1996
    @tsilfidis1996 3 роки тому +1

    love thsese!!! btw can you make a video complaining about the stryker ? maybe gaijin will care about what you have to say... I hate the way they pretend to care about what players actually want but in reallity its just a joke to them and we end up with vehicles like that one...