The pricing of this camera is just ridiculous. In my area X-T4 costs 1 449€, X-T5 costs 1 538€ and X-T50 costs 1 498€. For just extra 40€ you get much more with X-T5.
It’s compact, big difference. For me Reala Ace and Nostalgic Neg are essential for many in camera looks. Film dial sucks but I hope they let us customise it for C1 to c7
According to Fujirumors "Fujifilm X-T50 Enjoys Strongest Preorders (by FAR) among ALL X-T** Cameras" so yeah, I guess Fujifilm didn't make a mistake from price point of this camera. Although it's shame lots of people will skip this camera for the same very reason.
Great video. I bought the XT5 last year, and it's a beautiful camera that produces amazing and high-quality results. With that said, I am considering selling it, and using the money to buy the XT50. Why? Because as beautiful as and high-performing as it is, the XT5 is a larger and heavier camera to use for the street photography I like to do. Also, the XT5 is a beautiful object that people on sidewalks (my potential subjects) notice. I've had a couple of strangers come up to me and ask me about the camera. This is nice, but when you're trying to get in the zone of photographing in the streets of New York, it's a bit counter productive. My other camera is a Ricoh GR 3, which pretty much makes me invisible. I wanted a step up in image quality than the Ricoh, and the added bonus of the simulations. So for these reasons, I'm considering the XT50: a smaller, lighter, less noticeable XT5.
Thank you for sharing. Do you really need 40mpix that you are looking at X-T50? If you dont need this high resolution then check out X-S20 as it has almost all specs apart 40mpix sensor and costs way less than X-T50 especially that you can look up for a used one which would bring price even lower. Anyway whilst I wont be getting X-T50 due to very increased price I am eyeing for X-S20 as I dont need 40mpix, so no need to overpay for it in X-T50.
If the kept the 26mp sensor, added the new processor and ibis it would be great. In Australia the xt50 is the same price as the xt5 and in some places the Sony a7c ii…
At that price, it should have had two card slots, 26mp and weather sealing to be considered a mini X-T5. So basically you would get the X-T5 if you wanted 40mp. If a camera offers a 40mp sensor then it is made for photographers who demand more from their camera like 2 card slots. But those who love Fuji they buy them mostly because they look cool and they are fun to shoot with and Fuji knows that.
@@r423sdex why are you taking this comment personally? Being a fan boy is a religion and not everyone has to be believe in it. Camera companies would rather hear what the critics have to say so they could improve their next models.
I really wanted a smaller camera to carry around in my bag all the time. Ordered the X100VI, but I do not think I will get one before the end of the year...also I am having second thoughts because of the price. I owned the X-T20 before and I quite liked it so was hoping the X-T50 might be a good alternative. I share many of your misgivings about the camera, and again, end up looking at the used market for an X-E...1... The funny thing is, the demand for the X100V and now VI increased the prices for ALL fujifilm cameras, and 3 - 4 year old cameras are being sold for prices they were bought for. Second hand X100V is still more expensive now at BHP than what the price was for the new V. That is a bit insane...
Yeah, I still cant comprehand that Fuji cant provide enough cameras in stock, I even think they do that on porpouse so they could raise prices even more. Think I will have to stick with my X-T30ii or consider switching to X-T4 with IBIS.
@@dsego84 I did not order it right when it was announced. I guess distribution is not the same in every country. I was told by the store where I ordered it, that they get 3! pieces each month. And I know what number I am on that list. Maybe supply will change soon... but I am not so keen on the camera any longer
Its tough, back in the day I got X-T30ii over X100V to be able interchange lenses and as a bonus to save money. Now X-T50 and X100VI are priced similarly, so you need to decide if fixed lens with built in ND filter is better than the ability to interchange lenses. At this point I would even consider X-T4 as for me IBIS is more important that 40mpix sensor.
having both models (used to own a xt30)-- it's not comparable.Because once you put any lens thats not the 27mm pancake on the xt30 -- the camera loses its portability and slim nature. the x100v/vi however will always slim and small unless you put the tele/wider angle lens converter on it. Personally if its for travel, ill just stick to my x100vi where if i need to get to work; i use my xh2s/gfx100s. Different tools for different purposes.
It is strange you say that unless you put 27mm lens the kit wouldnt be as compact anymore, well yes, its physics, the same as you will add teleconverter on X100vi it wont be compact either. The main difference is wether fixed lens for you would be enough, because for me wasnt so I got X-T30ii and on travels I can either carry it with compact 27mm lens, but I also can have with me few other lenses and use them depending on the situation without being limited to one fixed lens. Also I wouldnt invest in those teleconverters as I think it would be harder to sell compared to actuall lens. But yeah, it depends on everyone preferences and needs.
Yeah, I guess for his described situation Ricoh would be even better, although personally for me Ricoh doesnt give that satisfaction feel of using it, it is just utilitarian camera in my opinion.
It's priced high so the consumer opts for the XT5 instead, which costs more but offers more too. If i were looking for a new Fuji, and i'm not, i would go for a used XT5 or used XH2.
for me weather sealing is THE deal breaker. this gear is SO expensive, i cant fathom why they would manufacture anything at that price point without it. its basically a level of insurance on investment. id prefer the smaller sensor if it meant having good sealing.
I ordered an X-T50. In Japan the X-T50 currently costs ¥20,000 more than the Sony a6700 - so it was a really tough decision as the a6700 definitely seems like the more capable camera to me. But I wanted something compact and stylish, with decent autofocus and IBIS, so I went with the X-T50.
For me it was tough decision also so I went with X-S20 as the only complaint with X-T30II was the lack of IBIS and X-S20 has it and doesnt cost that much like X-T50. Hope you will enjoy your camera!
Agree! Wish only their grips werent as bulky. If someone buys grips for X-T30ii and X-E4 I would be the guy who would like to remove some grip of X-S10/20 😁
@@ShotsByJev The grip is kind of bulky but it allows me to use it much more confortably with big lenses (like my 50-140) than with my x-t4. And the grip is about the same size as my 27 (TT artisan), with makes it a small (wouldn't say pocketable but very small) package still.
I also thought that they shouldnt upgrade the design in the future, because they just one tiny step away of making it futuristic instead of retro, so I understand if for some it is already doesnt look retro. The top dials definitely arent retro looking for me.
XT50 40MP USD 1400, Nikon Z5 26MP USD 1400, Nikon Z7ii 40MP, Sony a7Riii 40MP USD 2000. Only Fujifilm has film simulation. = NO BRAINER XT50 MORE VALUE FOR YOUR MONEY 🤑!
If you dont need 40mpix, then XS20 is the best value for the money. But you comparong pro Sony a7riii with casual X-t50 which wont last as long as Sony under tough work condition, not to mention the weather sealing on Sony
I was looking forward to upgrading my X-T30 to a camera that had IBIS and kept the smaller design. However, the X-T50 is over 50% more expensive! I would've justified it if the X-T50 was $100-200 more expensive, but this is way too much. I might upgrade to the X-S20 even though it lacks the focus switch up front. I don't care for 40 mp or the PASM dial.
Exactly my thoughts! Only its shame I live in small city and it is hard to find any used Fuji cameras let alone X-S20, but will keep an eye maybe one will show up so I wont need to buy it brand new
X-E4 is similar size to X100v and X100vi but can change lenses. Used the Fuji 18-55 kit lens (used) and TT artisan 27mm 2.8 lens. Great for travel. Very affordable. Really small camera sling bag. Have had 4-5 Fuji cameras. One thing I did not like with the XT30ii was the location of the Q button. I mainly take still photos.
I just can't see why anyone would buy that camera when it is priced so high. There is a lot of competition around that budget. They seem to have left the Q button in the same place as the X-T30, even after all the comments about how bad the position of it was. I haven't seen it in the flesh but it looks cheap and badly designed to me with the sloping shoulders and rounded off ends. I'll keep the X-T30 until I can afford something better, but it won't be the X-T50 at that price with that design. It's worth paying the extra for the X-T5.
I am now eyeing for X-S20 to replace my X-T30ii as it has IBIS and doesnt break the bank especially if you can find used in good condition, so you could take a look at that model as well
It's the same performance as an X-T5 in a smaller, lighter, cheaper package. Of course people will buy it. As for competition, what retro looking APS-C 40mpix ILC, IBIS camera is there at that price, size and weight with Fuji film simulations straight from camera? If none of that matters to you, why shoot Fuji in the first place? Get a Sony.
@@JackBurton-qp4hc I think the X-T5 for the extra money would be a better buy, but I'm sure you are right and it will sell well and it is smaller of course. So much choice and more models coming all the time of course.
@@ShotsByJev Check again. In the U.S. and Japan it's the cheap little cameras. There never was and never will be a market for the thousands of dollars cameras. Let them dig their own grave.
Keep XT30 Mark II, add XS10 which has IBIS, use them together complementary for two angles or at the same time with different lenses for photos and videos, they Will be enough. i spent many months in research and comparison, you don'tveven Need XS20, because XS10 Will behave similarly yto XT30 Mark II. #DarkVanities
Well, personally I dont need an extra camera as for work I already have two Sony A7iii, XS10 is similar to XT30ii, yes, but XS20 offers better ibis, newer processor, so depends on the budget and available options on uzed market both cameras could be great alternatives not only for XT30ii but for XT50 as well.
I completely agree. I sold my X-T30 in winter. Now I'm saving money for an upgrade. I think X-T50 is overpriced. And I start looking towards other cameras: X-T5 or X-H2 maybe.
Yes, I feel you, I also used to use XC15-45 for video, but felt a bit limited to it as it is also dark aperture, so with IBIS you are able to use more lenses for video
A lot of people seem to want something for nothing. the 40MP sensor is expensive. The IBIS is expensive. It's a newly designed body, not just a re-use of the previous XT-line. All of this costs some money. IN the US, the X-T5 is $300 more - it boils down to how important size is for you. To me it is, so X-T50 it is. If size is not a bother, sure, go X-T5. I don't think you can expect the X-T30II to be upgraded with IBIS, keep the same size, and yet the same price. That's just not happening. That's wanting something for nothing. Much less since inflation has kicked in.
Well, I dont understand why people defending price increase with new features being added. Because every new model has to have something new, you cant upgrade the camera with the same specs. Then those parts have been used in other cameras, they havent been designed solely for XT50 except for the design, so it isnt that expensive to reuse existing parts in new model. For years XT3, XT4, XT5 came out with new features and without price increase Then you say you cant expect XT30ii to be upgraded with ibis, kept the same size and price. There is X-S20 that has that ibis without 40mpix sensor. What was happening before if the new model packed with new specs came out the older models dropped in price. This time Fuji just released the camera with almost 100% price increase just so they could keep the prices on older models the same. Now you have XT30ii without ibis and 40mpix, XS20 with ibis and bit expensive, and XT50 double the price with ibis and 40mpix. So I just cant appreciate this their new pricing strategy.
@@ShotsByJev Keep in mind the inflation that has happened since Covid. You really can't expect the same game as before. The X-T30II doesn't have the 40MP sensor, but the 26MP sensor. Also the previous CPU (using the newer one- that also costs some money by the way). You mention re-using part- we don't know if the IBIS had to be redesigned a bit for the smaller X-T50 body - or at least re-use the one from XS20 which already had to be designed for a bit smaller. So on the X-T50 you get the 40MP sensor, a brand new CPU, a newly designed body as it is not a recycled body from the XT30II, X-T5 or XS20, IBIS and add on top of that inflation since the X-T30II. I wouldn't be surprised if the price drops a bit in a couple of month with some offer, but the point is, we can't expect the X-T30II to be kept at the same price with IBIS and new CPU, even keeping the same 26MP sensor. I do think Fuji should consider an X-T30III with the same 26MP sensor and the new CPU with new AF but not IBIS. I think that may be doable. If you don't understand people defending a price increase with new features, then I humbly suggest you give a critical look at pricing of parts and ask yourself if an older 26MP sensor wouldn't be cheaper than a newer 40MP one. Same with CPU, Same with IBIS which is material and mechanical contraption that the other model doesn't have. And then having to build and test that in the factory before shipping which ads more cost. It's not free.
with your logic every product new generation should significantly increase in price. The iPhone with this logic now should have cost at least 10k. But the prices increases little by little over generations due to inflation and other stuff. not like 500$ increase straight away. Here is another reason for the increase, they just want to earn money while they see their popularity, because they kept X-T30ii for the same price. Usually if company releases a new generation model the last one gets discontinued or gets big price drop, this time it didnt happen.
@@ShotsByJev No, I don’t think with my logic every product new generation should significantly increase in price. It’s about what your are providing, what is new materials wise, etc. Your continuing comparison with the XT30II is flawed because this is a camera whose production has already been quite streamlined and probably even still in stock to sell, with the same body and everything else for years. It a sensor that is quite likely much cheaper than the still somewhat new 40MP. Compare to adding a new IBIS mechanism. The expectation with he changes to keep the price at near same I find ludicrous- even if Fuji is still applying a bit more markup also. Heck, Fuji could just axe the XT30II and force the pricing tier up if so many people so want them and they want to take advantage.
I think the IBIS is absolutely worth it. On the x100vi I'm able to shoot at 1/10 shutter and leave the iso at max 3200, I get lovely low noise images in low light. I was frequently frustrated with the x-t30 at night, had to bump up the ISO up to 12800 and keep the shutter at ~1/100 or above to mitigate camera shake, mostly using the f2 primes 23 & 35. The most frustrating part was feeling defeated after I got better low light results with the iphone 15, since it does its multi-exposure magic to capture more light. I know I could've practiced a better grip and used continuous shooting to have a better chance of nailing the shot. But with the IBIS in the x100vi it's much easier, the new sensor also produces punchier colors. The 23 on the x100vi is a step above the f2 version, still not really possible to achieve blurry backgrounds, and this make the x-t50 a tempting alternative to the x100vi, unless I get the 35mm conversion lens for the x100.
Yeah, I get your point, but ask to ask $500 for IBIS I think is too much. When X-T4 with IBIS replaced X-T3 the price didnt increase, because it was natural upgrade the same as here. But as lots of people pointing out that X-S10/20 has IBIS and doesn’t break a bank with extra features like 40mpix that not all people need. Still as I saw the preorders on this X-T50 is very high which means Fuji did everything right and people are still willing to overspend on Fuji cameras.
@@ShotsByJev I agree, I would gladly give back the 40mpx on the x100vi, I don't need it. I opted to not shoot raw and only keep heic, the files are just too big and I don't cull after transferring the photos from the camera, since it's mostly family photos.
@@ShotsByJev I think so, just tested with my x100vi, same shot, jpeg 20mb, heic 13mb...and I suspect that heic is higher bit depth, but not sure how to confirm.
I have been considering the X-T5 for a while, then the X-T50 was announced and I also had the chance to handle an X-T5. I did not like the handling of the X-T5 at all. It was poor compared to my X-T1 and an X-T4 I had borrowed. So, I was very interested in the X-T50 as an upgrade to my X-T20, purely for the IBIS, but though I think the price is not unreasonable for the feature set one is getting, there is a problem with the pricing policy here. For a lot less money I can get an X-T4 used, which whilst larger, is much better specified in terms of handling and versatility, or I can get a new OM-5 and a range of lenses for about the same price. A camera with excellent weather sealing, compact size, class leading IBIS, great build quality and a large choice of high quality lenses and if I did not already have a number of Fujifilm lenses this would be the way I would go (and still might). I will hold fire on final judgement though until they actually hit the shops and one can hold one in ones hand, always very important when one outlays a lot of money. If the camera feels "just right" to me in the way the X-T1 and 4 do, but the X-T5 does not, I will be very tempted indeed to get one.
Does the X-T5 body that different to X-T4? I thought they are pretty much the same. But I am also considering for maybe used X-T4, because the only upgrate for my X-T30II I need is IBIS, but it will come with bigger size of X-T4 which I need to consider as well. In a meantime I will also wait and see how everything goes on Fujifilm market
Actually I even might, but while it has IBIS it lacks back command dial which I use, but most importantly I dont enjoy that bulk of grip on X-S20, for me X-T30II grip is fine, so on X-S10/20 feels like overkill.
@@ShotsByJev I don't like the style of the X-S cameras at all, no matter how well specified and competent they are. I like an after market grip on my X-T20, as it's just a little too small for my hands.
I had been seriously thinking about upgrading. I own the XT20 and Pro 2 both of which I love. Weight is a problem for me so I spent some time researching cameras about a week ago and realized that I already had what I needed. The larger sensor would be a problem as it requires more memory in your computer, hard drives, SSD cards etc. and i already have over 3tb of photos from my 60+ years of photography. I already have lens for m 4/3 system and you could buy a MO D 5 for around $1,100 and good used prime lens from KEH for under $200 for a weather resistant camera that weighs less than a pound. Or, the X-S20 and use my 4 Fuji lens, but weight is really my problem. The XT20 with the 23mm lens and the Pro 2 with the 27mm lens weighs almost the same.
@@ShotsByJev Believe it or not, I have started doing exercises to build strength up to carry the Pro 2 on my photo walks. I like the xt20 for the controls on the left side of the camera. I have them memorized so I don’t need to look at them. However, the Pro 2 just seems smoother to use. My only problem with owning two different cameras is that it is hard to jump from one to the other. If I could only have one it would be the Pro 2.
Film simulation is a nice feature but I don't think it deserves a separate dial. How often will it be used really once the novelty wears off? Fuji once again appears to value style over substance, but you can only take that so far. Fuji's style can't be beat, but it should always be number two not number one in camera design. Also, $300 price difference for the next higher model is not wide enough. Maybe they introduced the XT-50 just to sell more XT-5's....
yeah, that is very strange as they could do like on X-S20 reprogrammable dial, but if it is still possible to reprogram that dial on X-T50 it would be strange that the film sim markings still will be on the dial.
@@ShotsByJev I thought the same; then they could provide different 'heads' for the dial depending on the function, but after a while it starts to get ridiculous. Overall it's not a major issue and no camera is perfect, it's just too overpriced compared to what you can get for a little more. I can't imagine not regretting spending that extra $300 unless you really, really need the smaller size.
The issue with the pricing is the parts that make the xt50 special are also the more expensive parts in the xt5. The sensor, processor and ibs all are expensive and the downgrades in body and screens just isn’t enough to offset the rest.
But I didnt see the increase in price between X-T3, X-T4 and X-T5 where IBIS were added and new processor as well. Plus the processor and the IBIS are the same as in other cameras, it isnt something new Fujifilm has developed for this camera only. So they are exactly in the position to include those parts without extra cost of development parts for just one camera generation
I agree it's a little pricey but a new model with upgraded features. As a long-time wildlife and sports Fuji shooter, I wanted a small walk-around camera with an interchangeable lens. I currently shoot with the H2s. I had the 100 series but I found it was limiting and I couldn't set this camera up for my style of shooting. When the X-T50 was announced, it drew my attention and I purchased the camera. I really like the camera with the new 16-50 lens. It's very sharp even with the 40-meg sensor. I can also program the front and rear dials exactly the way I have my H2s set up. The front dial is ISO, and the rear dial is exposure comp. I've also programmed some buttons. One for eye detection and one for bird detection. IS works well. The film dial is okay; it was just an easy way to create different looks. I'm also finding it in good light; just switching to the full auto switch has worked well. Time well tell, but I'm happy with my purchase.
Would you recommend the Fujifilm - X-T30 || with XF18-55mm Lens Kit or Fujifilm X-T50 with XC15-45mmF3.5-5.6 OIS PZ Lens Kit? the X-T30 is priced at $1299 and the X-T50 is priced at $1499
Oh, thats interesting. If you dont plan to shoot handheld videos and you are ok without 40mipx sensor (like I am) then X-T30ii with better lens would make better choise I think. Even if you are going to film something hand held then 18-55 with OIS and post stabilisation would help. Just 18-55 lens is more joy to use as opposed to XC15-45 which feels like old ultrazoom cameras.
My Nikon D70 6MP looks just the same as my XT30 II on WhatsApp but i got it for the film simulations. A Big sensor is waste of money if its just going to be viewed on a phone in my view.
Well, it is a bit extreme example, but yeah, depending on the situation where you use the images. Even 12mpix iPhone is more than enough for social media. So there is no much need in those 40mpix for most people.
@@fredbloggs545 For some small corrections, it's possible to crop 6MP. But if one needs to crop a lot - it's definitely a lack of photography experience and knowledge. Of course, more megapixels is a good thing, but not for heavy cropping purposes.
@@FuckUA-camForHandles "it's definitely a lack of photography experience and knowledge" Utter nonsense. It simply means not having to carry longer focal length lenses. It is actually ideal on the fixed lens X100VI and when using the 27mm pancake on a ILC. "more megapixels is a good thing, but not for heavy cropping purposes." It literally is though.
Your own film recipes can still be accessed by the custom mode menu item in the Q menu I assume, right!? So you still have the same feature in that regard than before PLUS the film simulation dial, which in fact doubles your options of accessing simulations!
yea people are butthurt because not everything has come to their liking and calling the dial useless. im hoping theyll make an update where you can asign recipes to the FS1 FS2 and FS3, which should be possible i think
Well yes, I still can switch between saved settings in Q menu, but then film sim dial would be useless replacing the drive dial that I actually used switching to video mode and back verg fast.
@@ShotsByJev Press the drive dial and one up and you are in video mode as video is the last item on the drive menu. Otherwise the X-S20 is.a better option anyway if you are a hybrid shooter.
Yes, but I meant that on X-T50 there is no drive dial anymore and yes, I was waiting for X-T50 for potential upgrade, but now I am leaning more towards X-S20
Complete fail camera: near no difference to T5 but near same price? Where is the point Fuji? Why not a camera with same sensor but lower price point and no IBIS on board? A price point 1000Euro would be perfect..homework fail Fuji!😢
Exactly, I was expecting it to be 1000eur max, which I would accept 200eur increase in price compared to X-T30II, but for some reason Fuji increased the price a lot.
"Complete fail camera" Yet fuji rumors has stated the X-T50 has had the highest number of clicks on their pre-order affiliate links than any other Fuji except for the X100VI. It is reported by those "in the know" that there have been massive pre-orders.
@@JackBurton-qp4hc everyone has its own thinking..my one: pay additional 170 Euro and take the T5 or you pay 1000 Euro and save a lot taking the T30 which is better value. From other brands and their offer I dont want mention..
Ofcourse it wont be complete fail for everyone. Some have only spare money for X-T30ii for 800€, for some 1400€ for X-T50 not that big money and others buys Leicas for few K euros just to shoot occasionally and they are fine.
I just recently got into more serious photography and wanted to buy my first digital camera that isnt a point and shoot. I love shooting on film thats why im leaning into getting a fuji but i just can't decide which one i should be getting with all of them being so similar yet so different at the same time 🥲
If you are just starting out you dont need this X-T50, because it will be overkill for you in terms of price for sure. Take a look at X-T30II which I have and also have a video review about it. Another great oprion from Fuji is X-S10/20 as there you will find slightly different design an the addition of in body image stabilisation.
@@ShotsByJev Thanks! yeah the x-t50 is not worth it in ny opinion, x-s20 was one of my options but I heard it overheats quite a lot even when not shooting a video so that made me kinda scared 😢 and the dedicated fan costs almost 300$ here!
The pricing of this camera is just ridiculous. In my area X-T4 costs 1 449€, X-T5 costs 1 538€ and X-T50 costs 1 498€. For just extra 40€ you get much more with X-T5.
XT5 is not much different and also compact lol and it has more features for the price. @mipmipmipmipmip
It’s compact, big difference. For me Reala Ace and Nostalgic Neg are essential for many in camera looks. Film dial sucks but I hope they let us customise it for C1 to c7
According to Fujirumors "Fujifilm X-T50 Enjoys Strongest Preorders (by FAR) among ALL X-T** Cameras" so yeah, I guess Fujifilm didn't make a mistake from price point of this camera. Although it's shame lots of people will skip this camera for the same very reason.
Great video. I bought the XT5 last year, and it's a beautiful camera that produces amazing and high-quality results. With that said, I am considering selling it, and using the money to buy the XT50. Why? Because as beautiful as and high-performing as it is, the XT5 is a larger and heavier camera to use for the street photography I like to do. Also, the XT5 is a beautiful object that people on sidewalks (my potential subjects) notice. I've had a couple of strangers come up to me and ask me about the camera. This is nice, but when you're trying to get in the zone of photographing in the streets of New York, it's a bit counter productive. My other camera is a Ricoh GR 3, which pretty much makes me invisible. I wanted a step up in image quality than the Ricoh, and the added bonus of the simulations. So for these reasons, I'm considering the XT50: a smaller, lighter, less noticeable XT5.
Thank you for sharing. Do you really need 40mpix that you are looking at X-T50? If you dont need this high resolution then check out X-S20 as it has almost all specs apart 40mpix sensor and costs way less than X-T50 especially that you can look up for a used one which would bring price even lower. Anyway whilst I wont be getting X-T50 due to very increased price I am eyeing for X-S20 as I dont need 40mpix, so no need to overpay for it in X-T50.
Street photography need 40 MPix???😂
Snap! Just got the 50 and already have a beloved GR III!
@@ShotsByJev You make a good point. I ended up buying a used XT30, btw.
If the kept the 26mp sensor, added the new processor and ibis it would be great.
In Australia the xt50 is the same price as the xt5 and in some places the Sony a7c ii…
Exactly, I am now thinking X-T4 over X-T50, especially when saw used one is for just 800€, although I need to consider the bigger size of X-T4
just change the image quality setting to M and youll have around 20MP
and why then overpay for that 40mpix sensor and never use it?
I want 16 megapixels, I want 24, I want 40, I want it to be full frame, I want it to be different to whatever they make it .
My thoughts exactly
At that price, it should have had two card slots, 26mp and weather sealing to be considered a mini X-T5. So basically you would get the X-T5 if you wanted 40mp. If a camera offers a 40mp sensor then it is made for photographers who demand more from their camera like 2 card slots. But those who love Fuji they buy them mostly because they look cool and they are fun to shoot with and Fuji knows that.
Yes, it is a sad true.
I want 4 card slots. I also want 20 stops of image stabilization. I also want it to weigh 10 grams.
@@r423sdex why are you taking this comment personally? Being a fan boy is a religion and not everyone has to be believe in it. Camera companies would rather hear what the critics have to say so they could improve their next models.
Problem is if they make a mini xt-5, no one would buy the XT-5. The XT-50 would kill the sales of the XT-5, being smaller and lighter.
I really wanted a smaller camera to carry around in my bag all the time. Ordered the X100VI, but I do not think I will get one before the end of the year...also I am having second thoughts because of the price. I owned the X-T20 before and I quite liked it so was hoping the X-T50 might be a good alternative. I share many of your misgivings about the camera, and again, end up looking at the used market for an X-E...1... The funny thing is, the demand for the X100V and now VI increased the prices for ALL fujifilm cameras, and 3 - 4 year old cameras are being sold for prices they were bought for. Second hand X100V is still more expensive now at BHP than what the price was for the new V. That is a bit insane...
Yeah, I still cant comprehand that Fuji cant provide enough cameras in stock, I even think they do that on porpouse so they could raise prices even more. Think I will have to stick with my X-T30ii or consider switching to X-T4 with IBIS.
I don't understand, I got mine in Europe within two weeks back in March.
@@dsego84 I did not order it right when it was announced. I guess distribution is not the same in every country. I was told by the store where I ordered it, that they get 3! pieces each month. And I know what number I am on that list. Maybe supply will change soon... but I am not so keen on the camera any longer
I guess it depends on the country and the demand.
Wow, Fujifilm seems producing like 100 cameras per day :D
How would you compare it to the X100VI? Understand it would be more expensive because of buying a lens. But I am tired of waiting for the X100VI .
Its tough, back in the day I got X-T30ii over X100V to be able interchange lenses and as a bonus to save money. Now X-T50 and X100VI are priced similarly, so you need to decide if fixed lens with built in ND filter is better than the ability to interchange lenses. At this point I would even consider X-T4 as for me IBIS is more important that 40mpix sensor.
having both models (used to own a xt30)-- it's not comparable.Because once you put any lens thats not the 27mm pancake on the xt30 -- the camera loses its portability and slim nature. the x100v/vi however will always slim and small unless you put the tele/wider angle lens converter on it. Personally if its for travel, ill just stick to my x100vi where if i need to get to work; i use my xh2s/gfx100s. Different tools for different purposes.
It is strange you say that unless you put 27mm lens the kit wouldnt be as compact anymore, well yes, its physics, the same as you will add teleconverter on X100vi it wont be compact either. The main difference is wether fixed lens for you would be enough, because for me wasnt so I got X-T30ii and on travels I can either carry it with compact 27mm lens, but I also can have with me few other lenses and use them depending on the situation without being limited to one fixed lens. Also I wouldnt invest in those teleconverters as I think it would be harder to sell compared to actuall lens. But yeah, it depends on everyone preferences and needs.
@@JustZGmaybe you need to consider gr3 as it’ll always remain compact and pocketable
Yeah, I guess for his described situation Ricoh would be even better, although personally for me Ricoh doesnt give that satisfaction feel of using it, it is just utilitarian camera in my opinion.
It's priced high so the consumer opts for the XT5 instead, which costs more but offers more too. If i were looking for a new Fuji, and i'm not, i would go for a used XT5 or used XH2.
Nice thought actually!
if it was weather sealed i think that would go a lot further towards justifying the price.
Agree, new design and IBIS besides sensor and processor update (which was expected) not enough to justify $500 price increase.
Agree,. Should be standard. Imagine putting your phone in a plastic bag nowadays......
for me weather sealing is THE deal breaker. this gear is SO expensive, i cant fathom why they would manufacture anything at that price point without it. its basically a level of insurance on investment. id prefer the smaller sensor if it meant having good sealing.
Yeah! With $900 X-T30ii it was more forgiving not being weather sealed, now it costs way way more but still as fragile as $900 camera
I ordered an X-T50. In Japan the X-T50 currently costs ¥20,000 more than the Sony a6700 - so it was a really tough decision as the a6700 definitely seems like the more capable camera to me. But I wanted something compact and stylish, with decent autofocus and IBIS, so I went with the X-T50.
For me it was tough decision also so I went with X-S20 as the only complaint with X-T30II was the lack of IBIS and X-S20 has it and doesnt cost that much like X-T50. Hope you will enjoy your camera!
The x-s10 and x-s20 are better values for the money.
Agree! Wish only their grips werent as bulky. If someone buys grips for X-T30ii and X-E4 I would be the guy who would like to remove some grip of X-S10/20 😁
@@ShotsByJev The grip is kind of bulky but it allows me to use it much more confortably with big lenses (like my 50-140) than with my x-t4. And the grip is about the same size as my 27 (TT artisan), with makes it a small (wouldn't say pocketable but very small) package still.
Think will need to try it in real life to see if the grip would be the problem. Although would have to give up my red shutter button extension 😁
X-T30II
yeh..it looks not as nice as the previous ones. No kinda- vintage design on this one.
I also thought that they shouldnt upgrade the design in the future, because they just one tiny step away of making it futuristic instead of retro, so I understand if for some it is already doesnt look retro. The top dials definitely arent retro looking for me.
XT50 40MP USD 1400, Nikon Z5 26MP USD 1400, Nikon Z7ii 40MP, Sony a7Riii 40MP USD 2000. Only Fujifilm has film simulation. = NO BRAINER XT50 MORE VALUE FOR YOUR MONEY 🤑!
If you dont need 40mpix, then XS20 is the best value for the money. But you comparong pro Sony a7riii with casual X-t50 which wont last as long as Sony under tough work condition, not to mention the weather sealing on Sony
I was looking forward to upgrading my X-T30 to a camera that had IBIS and kept the smaller design. However, the X-T50 is over 50% more expensive! I would've justified it if the X-T50 was $100-200 more expensive, but this is way too much. I might upgrade to the X-S20 even though it lacks the focus switch up front. I don't care for 40 mp or the PASM dial.
Exactly my thoughts! Only its shame I live in small city and it is hard to find any used Fuji cameras let alone X-S20, but will keep an eye maybe one will show up so I wont need to buy it brand new
Its a gimmick camera with that stupid FiLm dial
Got an XT-30 for many years. Why upgrade?
Depends, for me the only downside was the lack of IBIS
Just returned from a trip to Europe. Took over a 1000 photos with my used Fuji X-E4. Terrific travel camera at a reasonable price.
The size of X-T4 didnt bother you?
X-E4 is similar size to X100v and X100vi but can change lenses. Used the Fuji 18-55 kit lens (used) and TT artisan 27mm 2.8 lens. Great for travel. Very affordable. Really small camera sling bag. Have had 4-5 Fuji cameras. One thing I did not like with the XT30ii was the location of the Q button. I mainly take still photos.
Oh, sorry, misread X-E4 with X-T4, X-E ofcourse are pretty compact camera and is great for traveling like mine X-T30ii
I just can't see why anyone would buy that camera when it is priced so high. There is a lot of competition around that budget. They seem to have left the Q button in the same place as the X-T30, even after all the comments about how bad the position of it was. I haven't seen it in the flesh but it looks cheap and badly designed to me with the sloping shoulders and rounded off ends. I'll keep the X-T30 until I can afford something better, but it won't be the X-T50 at that price with that design. It's worth paying the extra for the X-T5.
I am now eyeing for X-S20 to replace my X-T30ii as it has IBIS and doesnt break the bank especially if you can find used in good condition, so you could take a look at that model as well
@@ShotsByJev Yes and thanks for mentioning that. The XS10 or XS20 do make sense really and I'll try to have look at those too before buying. Cheers.
It's the same performance as an X-T5 in a smaller, lighter, cheaper package. Of course people will buy it. As for competition, what retro looking APS-C 40mpix ILC, IBIS camera is there at that price, size and weight with Fuji film simulations straight from camera? If none of that matters to you, why shoot Fuji in the first place? Get a Sony.
@@JackBurton-qp4hc I think the X-T5 for the extra money would be a better buy, but I'm sure you are right and it will sell well and it is smaller of course. So much choice and more models coming all the time of course.
Remove 40mpix and you have X-S20 that is way cheaper
The xt50 will be the cheapest new fuji camera, xt6 will see a big jump in price
I dont think so, there is X-S20 that is cheaper as well as X-T30ii still not discontinued
The best selling cameras are Kodak. As for me, I'll stick with the the Pixel. These are cameras anymore. They are collector's items.
I dont know where you brought Kodak from, but the best selling camera brand is Canon
@@ShotsByJev Check again. In the U.S. and Japan it's the cheap little cameras. There never was and never will be a market for the thousands of dollars cameras. Let them dig their own grave.
provide the link to this information as I googled and it says Canon is most selling camera brand.
All we need is less 😉
Less price at least 😁
Film simulation dial is for tik tokers. For normal people, no.
I wouldnt be this harsh, but I kind of agree
Horses for courses. Normal people, what do they do differently.
XT50 offers easy total camera control including film simulation 😮!
Who are to decide who "normal people" are?
Every XT-xx has an Auto switch, do you b!tch about that?
Just put the iso on the command dial and stop crying or buy a sony.
Keep XT30 Mark II, add XS10 which has IBIS, use them together complementary for two angles or at the same time with different lenses for photos and videos, they Will be enough. i spent many months in research and comparison, you don'tveven Need XS20, because XS10 Will behave similarly yto XT30 Mark II. #DarkVanities
Well, personally I dont need an extra camera as for work I already have two Sony A7iii, XS10 is similar to XT30ii, yes, but XS20 offers better ibis, newer processor, so depends on the budget and available options on uzed market both cameras could be great alternatives not only for XT30ii but for XT50 as well.
@@ShotsByJev sure, it all depends on the nerds of each person. ✍️
I completely agree. I sold my X-T30 in winter. Now I'm saving money for an upgrade. I think X-T50 is overpriced. And I start looking towards other cameras: X-T5 or X-H2 maybe.
Also take a loom at X-S20, I now started thinkin of scouting for one used or X-T4 used to replace my X-T30II
I own the original XT30 and I don’t see the need to upgrade, for video I can use the 18-55 kit lens for a stabilised video.
Yes, I feel you, I also used to use XC15-45 for video, but felt a bit limited to it as it is also dark aperture, so with IBIS you are able to use more lenses for video
A lot of people seem to want something for nothing. the 40MP sensor is expensive. The IBIS is expensive. It's a newly designed body, not just a re-use of the previous XT-line. All of this costs some money.
IN the US, the X-T5 is $300 more - it boils down to how important size is for you. To me it is, so X-T50 it is. If size is not a bother, sure, go X-T5.
I don't think you can expect the X-T30II to be upgraded with IBIS, keep the same size, and yet the same price. That's just not happening. That's wanting something for nothing. Much less since inflation has kicked in.
Well, I dont understand why people defending price increase with new features being added. Because every new model has to have something new, you cant upgrade the camera with the same specs. Then those parts have been used in other cameras, they havent been designed solely for XT50 except for the design, so it isnt that expensive to reuse existing parts in new model. For years XT3, XT4, XT5 came out with new features and without price increase
Then you say you cant expect XT30ii to be upgraded with ibis, kept the same size and price. There is X-S20 that has that ibis without 40mpix sensor. What was happening before if the new model packed with new specs came out the older models dropped in price. This time Fuji just released the camera with almost 100% price increase just so they could keep the prices on older models the same. Now you have XT30ii without ibis and 40mpix, XS20 with ibis and bit expensive, and XT50 double the price with ibis and 40mpix.
So I just cant appreciate this their new pricing strategy.
@@ShotsByJev Keep in mind the inflation that has happened since Covid. You really can't expect the same game as before. The X-T30II doesn't have the 40MP sensor, but the 26MP sensor. Also the previous CPU (using the newer one- that also costs some money by the way).
You mention re-using part- we don't know if the IBIS had to be redesigned a bit for the smaller X-T50 body - or at least re-use the one from XS20 which already had to be designed for a bit smaller. So on the X-T50 you get the 40MP sensor, a brand new CPU, a newly designed body as it is not a recycled body from the XT30II, X-T5 or XS20, IBIS and add on top of that inflation since the X-T30II.
I wouldn't be surprised if the price drops a bit in a couple of month with some offer, but the point is, we can't expect the X-T30II to be kept at the same price with IBIS and new CPU, even keeping the same 26MP sensor.
I do think Fuji should consider an X-T30III with the same 26MP sensor and the new CPU with new AF but not IBIS. I think that may be doable.
If you don't understand people defending a price increase with new features, then I humbly suggest you give a critical look at pricing of parts and ask yourself if an older 26MP sensor wouldn't be cheaper than a newer 40MP one. Same with CPU, Same with IBIS which is material and mechanical contraption that the other model doesn't have. And then having to build and test that in the factory before shipping which ads more cost.
It's not free.
with your logic every product new generation should significantly increase in price. The iPhone with this logic now should have cost at least 10k. But the prices increases little by little over generations due to inflation and other stuff. not like 500$ increase straight away. Here is another reason for the increase, they just want to earn money while they see their popularity, because they kept X-T30ii for the same price. Usually if company releases a new generation model the last one gets discontinued or gets big price drop, this time it didnt happen.
@@ShotsByJev No, I don’t think with my logic every product new generation should significantly increase in price. It’s about what your are providing, what is new materials wise, etc. Your continuing comparison with the XT30II is flawed because this is a camera whose production has already been quite streamlined and probably even still in stock to sell, with the same body and everything else for years. It a sensor that is quite likely much cheaper than the still somewhat new 40MP. Compare to adding a new IBIS mechanism. The expectation with he changes to keep the price at near same I find ludicrous- even if Fuji is still applying a bit more markup also. Heck, Fuji could just axe the XT30II and force the pricing tier up if so many people so want them and they want to take advantage.
I think the IBIS is absolutely worth it. On the x100vi I'm able to shoot at 1/10 shutter and leave the iso at max 3200, I get lovely low noise images in low light. I was frequently frustrated with the x-t30 at night, had to bump up the ISO up to 12800 and keep the shutter at ~1/100 or above to mitigate camera shake, mostly using the f2 primes 23 & 35. The most frustrating part was feeling defeated after I got better low light results with the iphone 15, since it does its multi-exposure magic to capture more light. I know I could've practiced a better grip and used continuous shooting to have a better chance of nailing the shot. But with the IBIS in the x100vi it's much easier, the new sensor also produces punchier colors. The 23 on the x100vi is a step above the f2 version, still not really possible to achieve blurry backgrounds, and this make the x-t50 a tempting alternative to the x100vi, unless I get the 35mm conversion lens for the x100.
Yeah, I get your point, but ask to ask $500 for IBIS I think is too much. When X-T4 with IBIS replaced X-T3 the price didnt increase, because it was natural upgrade the same as here. But as lots of people pointing out that X-S10/20 has IBIS and doesn’t break a bank with extra features like 40mpix that not all people need. Still as I saw the preorders on this X-T50 is very high which means Fuji did everything right and people are still willing to overspend on Fuji cameras.
@@ShotsByJev I agree, I would gladly give back the 40mpx on the x100vi, I don't need it. I opted to not shoot raw and only keep heic, the files are just too big and I don't cull after transferring the photos from the camera, since it's mostly family photos.
Does HEIC helps to save space?
@@ShotsByJev I think so, just tested with my x100vi, same shot, jpeg 20mb, heic 13mb...and I suspect that heic is higher bit depth, but not sure how to confirm.
Nice space saving then!
I have been considering the X-T5 for a while, then the X-T50 was announced and I also had the chance to handle an X-T5. I did not like the handling of the X-T5 at all. It was poor compared to my X-T1 and an X-T4 I had borrowed. So, I was very interested in the X-T50 as an upgrade to my X-T20, purely for the IBIS, but though I think the price is not unreasonable for the feature set one is getting, there is a problem with the pricing policy here. For a lot less money I can get an X-T4 used, which whilst larger, is much better specified in terms of handling and versatility, or I can get a new OM-5 and a range of lenses for about the same price. A camera with excellent weather sealing, compact size, class leading IBIS, great build quality and a large choice of high quality lenses and if I did not already have a number of Fujifilm lenses this would be the way I would go (and still might). I will hold fire on final judgement though until they actually hit the shops and one can hold one in ones hand, always very important when one outlays a lot of money. If the camera feels "just right" to me in the way the X-T1 and 4 do, but the X-T5 does not, I will be very tempted indeed to get one.
Does the X-T5 body that different to X-T4? I thought they are pretty much the same. But I am also considering for maybe used X-T4, because the only upgrate for my X-T30II I need is IBIS, but it will come with bigger size of X-T4 which I need to consider as well. In a meantime I will also wait and see how everything goes on Fujifilm market
@@ShotsByJev for IBIS maybe also look at the X-S10 and X-S20?
Actually I even might, but while it has IBIS it lacks back command dial which I use, but most importantly I dont enjoy that bulk of grip on X-S20, for me X-T30II grip is fine, so on X-S10/20 feels like overkill.
@@ShotsByJev the top dial on the X-S10 is positioned so that you can use it with your right thumb, so yes, it does have a rear command dial.
@@ShotsByJev I don't like the style of the X-S cameras at all, no matter how well specified and competent they are. I like an after market grip on my X-T20, as it's just a little too small for my hands.
I had been seriously thinking about upgrading. I own the XT20 and Pro 2 both of which I love. Weight is a problem for me so I spent some time researching cameras about a week ago and realized that I already had what I needed. The larger sensor would be a problem as it requires more memory in your computer, hard drives, SSD cards etc. and i already have over 3tb of photos from my 60+ years of photography. I already have lens for m 4/3 system and you could buy a MO D 5 for around $1,100 and good used prime lens from KEH for under $200 for a weather resistant camera that weighs less than a pound. Or, the X-S20 and use my 4 Fuji lens, but weight is really my problem. The XT20 with the 23mm lens and the Pro 2 with the 27mm lens weighs almost the same.
How you choose between those two cameras, what purpouse serves tour x-Pro2 and X-T20?
@@ShotsByJev
Believe it or not, I have started doing exercises to build strength up to carry the Pro 2 on my photo walks. I like the xt20 for the controls on the left side of the camera. I have them memorized so I don’t need to look at them. However, the Pro 2 just seems smoother to use. My only problem with owning two different cameras is that it is hard to jump from one to the other. If I could only have one it would be the Pro 2.
Thank you for sharing, I never tried X-Pro cameras before, but hope in the future will be able to!
@@ShotsByJev , I use the Pro 2 when it rains or we have high humidity so being I live in the south I almost always use the Pro 2.
Film simulation is a nice feature but I don't think it deserves a separate dial. How often will it be used really once the novelty wears off? Fuji once again appears to value style over substance, but you can only take that so far. Fuji's style can't be beat, but it should always be number two not number one in camera design. Also, $300 price difference for the next higher model is not wide enough. Maybe they introduced the XT-50 just to sell more XT-5's....
yeah, that is very strange as they could do like on X-S20 reprogrammable dial, but if it is still possible to reprogram that dial on X-T50 it would be strange that the film sim markings still will be on the dial.
@@ShotsByJev I thought the same; then they could provide different 'heads' for the dial depending on the function, but after a while it starts to get ridiculous. Overall it's not a major issue and no camera is perfect, it's just too overpriced compared to what you can get for a little more. I can't imagine not regretting spending that extra $300 unless you really, really need the smaller size.
You don't hide your Unique Selling Point in a menu.
The issue with the pricing is the parts that make the xt50 special are also the more expensive parts in the xt5. The sensor, processor and ibs all are expensive and the downgrades in body and screens just isn’t enough to offset the rest.
But I didnt see the increase in price between X-T3, X-T4 and X-T5 where IBIS were added and new processor as well. Plus the processor and the IBIS are the same as in other cameras, it isnt something new Fujifilm has developed for this camera only. So they are exactly in the position to include those parts without extra cost of development parts for just one camera generation
I agree it's a little pricey but a new model with upgraded features. As a long-time wildlife and sports Fuji shooter, I wanted a small walk-around camera with an interchangeable lens. I currently shoot with the H2s. I had the 100 series but I found it was limiting and I couldn't set this camera up for my style of shooting. When the X-T50 was announced, it drew my attention and I purchased the camera. I really like the camera with the new 16-50 lens. It's very sharp even with the 40-meg sensor. I can also program the front and rear dials exactly the way I have my H2s set up. The front dial is ISO, and the rear dial is exposure comp. I've also programmed some buttons. One for eye detection and one for bird detection. IS works well. The film dial is okay; it was just an easy way to create different looks. I'm also finding it in good light; just switching to the full auto switch has worked well. Time well tell, but I'm happy with my purchase.
I am glad you found it suitable for you and hope it will be this way. I think it is ok that some finds things useful as others not so much
i can get a ZF with kens for 3000 aud, this body alone is 2500 🤕 would love a fuji but also impossible to play with one here in Aus…
Take a look at X-S20 instead, I am eyeing for this camera as it is almost the same as X-T50 but just without 40mpix sensor and with better battery
I don't shoot with film simulations, I just add them on image processing in Capture One, because I shoot raw. So no, I will not use this dial.
Yeah, that dial meant for casual shooters, who shoot jpg only
Would you recommend the Fujifilm - X-T30 || with XF18-55mm Lens Kit or
Fujifilm X-T50 with XC15-45mmF3.5-5.6
OIS PZ Lens Kit? the X-T30 is priced at $1299 and the X-T50 is priced at $1499
Oh, thats interesting. If you dont plan to shoot handheld videos and you are ok without 40mipx sensor (like I am) then X-T30ii with better lens would make better choise I think. Even if you are going to film something hand held then 18-55 with OIS and post stabilisation would help. Just 18-55 lens is more joy to use as opposed to XC15-45 which feels like old ultrazoom cameras.
@@ShotsByJev Thank you!
My Nikon D70 6MP looks just the same as my XT30 II on WhatsApp but i got it for the film simulations. A Big sensor is waste of money if its just going to be viewed on a
phone in my view.
Well, it is a bit extreme example, but yeah, depending on the situation where you use the images. Even 12mpix iPhone is more than enough for social media. So there is no much need in those 40mpix for most people.
Now crop your 6mp image.
@@fredbloggs545 For some small corrections, it's possible to crop 6MP. But if one needs to crop a lot - it's definitely a lack of photography experience and knowledge. Of course, more megapixels is a good thing, but not for heavy cropping purposes.
@@FuckUA-camForHandles
"it's definitely a lack of photography experience and knowledge"
Utter nonsense. It simply means not having to carry longer focal length lenses. It is actually ideal on the fixed lens X100VI and when using the 27mm pancake on a ILC.
"more megapixels is a good thing, but not for heavy cropping purposes."
It literally is though.
Your own film recipes can still be accessed by the custom mode menu item in the Q menu I assume, right!? So you still have the same feature in that regard than before PLUS the film simulation dial, which in fact doubles your options of accessing simulations!
yea people are butthurt because not everything has come to their liking and calling the dial useless. im hoping theyll make an update where you can asign recipes to the FS1 FS2 and FS3, which should be possible i think
Well yes, I still can switch between saved settings in Q menu, but then film sim dial would be useless replacing the drive dial that I actually used switching to video mode and back verg fast.
@@ShotsByJev Press the drive dial and one up and you are in video mode as video is the last item on the drive menu. Otherwise the X-S20 is.a better option anyway if you are a hybrid shooter.
Yes, but I meant that on X-T50 there is no drive dial anymore and yes, I was waiting for X-T50 for potential upgrade, but now I am leaning more towards X-S20
Complete fail camera: near no difference to T5 but near same price? Where is the point Fuji? Why not a camera with same sensor but lower price point and no IBIS on board? A price point 1000Euro would be perfect..homework fail Fuji!😢
Exactly, I was expecting it to be 1000eur max, which I would accept 200eur increase in price compared to X-T30II, but for some reason Fuji increased the price a lot.
"Complete fail camera"
Yet fuji rumors has stated the X-T50 has had the highest number of clicks on their pre-order affiliate links than any other Fuji except for the X100VI.
It is reported by those "in the know" that there have been massive pre-orders.
@@JackBurton-qp4hc everyone has its own thinking..my one: pay additional 170 Euro and take the T5 or you pay 1000 Euro and save a lot taking the T30 which is better value. From other brands and their offer I dont want mention..
@@cristiabc1310
My point was that it doesn't appear to be the "Complete fail camera" you believe it to be.
Ofcourse it wont be complete fail for everyone. Some have only spare money for X-T30ii for 800€, for some 1400€ for X-T50 not that big money and others buys Leicas for few K euros just to shoot occasionally and they are fine.
Xt3 is still the best value for the money 😉👌
Yes, but it lacks IBIS that X-T4 has, or X-S20
I just recently got into more serious photography and wanted to buy my first digital camera that isnt a point and shoot. I love shooting on film thats why im leaning into getting a fuji but i just can't decide which one i should be getting with all of them being so similar yet so different at the same time 🥲
If you are just starting out you dont need this X-T50, because it will be overkill for you in terms of price for sure. Take a look at X-T30II which I have and also have a video review about it. Another great oprion from Fuji is X-S10/20 as there you will find slightly different design an the addition of in body image stabilisation.
@@ShotsByJev Thanks! yeah the x-t50 is not worth it in ny opinion, x-s20 was one of my options but I heard it overheats quite a lot even when not shooting a video so that made me kinda scared 😢 and the dedicated fan costs almost 300$ here!
Stop complaining. Why wast time.
You did just that. Or you want to watch only positive reviews without any critique?
The review is absolutely meaningless. Horses for courses !
@@ShotsByJev let’s see the quality photos you produce.