the true annoying thing about fujifilm is how outrageous pricing has gotten both new and used markets... some of the cameras are going for more than their retail prices now...
It's videos like this that we all learn how many people rely heavily on auto focus. And no, I'm NOT saying that's bad or criticising anyone! Anyway, I shoot Fuji, and yes for paid work, because it's fun. And for the insane amount of creativity I have with the film sims and the RAW converter, etc. Anyway, not knocking other brands, Fuji is just more interesting to me. X-T5, X-H2s, X-H1.
Thanks for your candor in discussing the Fuji X-T5 warts and all, instead the super rosey picture that most UA-cam reviewers paint. It’s refreshing to encounter someone with actual honesty.
I own several Sony cameras (A1, A7SIII, FX6...). The XT5 is the camera I enjoy shooting with the most when it's not paid work. I tried several times to use my Fuji cameras professionally both for photos and videos, but I came to the conclusion that the autofocus issues prevent me to have full confidence in it. The XT5 is a fantastic every day/family/travel/casual portraits camera, but I can't rely on it for paid work most of the time.
When will Sony shooters stop talking about auto-focus as if it is the only thing that matters? I use my Fuji XH2s more than my Canon R6II and Panasonic S5iix for weddings with excellent results. Fuji's auto-focus is no doubt not as good as Sony's, but it is good enough for any professional work. To me, image quality counts, and Fuji does not disappoint. The dynamic range alone on Fuji is enough to consider Fuji. I use my xh2s for video only.
@@nigerian-nightmare AF is not as important for video as it is for still photography... When you take a thousand photos and realize when you get home that over half of them are slightly out of focus... it's not usable for paid work
Got an XH2s a few months ago and switched to XT5. The former was a beast of a camera but I felt more creative with the XT5. And for what I need it to be, it delivers. Happy with it.
@@petrolpoodle the dials feel more intuitive over PASM dial. I tend to fall back to my XT2 most of the time for personal use. my XH2s for more professional work
I’ve been shooting with Fujifilm professionally for the past 3 years now, and I have to agree with the autofocus issue… if they can fix that, I think many more people will seriously consider the system for pro work. You can’t deny they make great cameras though. I think the sensor just adds a certain ‘vibe’ to shots that makes it so easy to edit in post, be it photo and video. Ive been loving your photos mate, keep it up!
@@namnguyenngoc3966sorry to disagree, but it is not. There are a lot of issues related to Fujifilm AF besides the missed focus in shots: there is the god awful lack of linearity when racking focus (it’s always hunting and stepping), the settings are unnecessarily convoluted, it makes linear motor lenses perform below USM lenses do in 10 year old Sony bodies, and on top of that it gives false positives. I’m a Fuji lover and I have been for a while, but I’m so glad people are finally calling Fuji AF by its name: a hot mess that can only be fixed by releasing a new mount. Oh, and by firing the entirety of the software development department. But that’s a discussion for another moment.
Stop dreaming ! I shot Fuji during 8 years with an XT1 and then XT2. Even the newer released cameras seem to still have the same kind of autofocus issues. The autofocus works better on the newer models of course but it almost feels like it’s due to more powerfull and rapid processors or sensor in the case on the XH2S for example than real algorithm improvements. The failure of Fuji in delivering an autofocus on par with Sony or Canon made me switch to Sony. Also as said by others the price. When Fuji released the XH2S at £2,500 nakef body, that opened up my horizons with the a7IV in the same price range despite Sony’s tendency to overprice their own cameras (IMHO). I finally ended up with the A7RV but that’s another story 😂
Thanks for your video. I have been using the XT-5 for several months with various lenses. I don't have the slight blur in your photos with my XT-5. My pictures are absolutely sharp. I use the XF 23 1.4, the Tamron 11-20 2.8, Tamron 17-70 2.8 and XF 70-300. I didn't notice this blur on any lens. Maybe you'll have your XT-5 checked once. That doesn't seem normal to me. Many greetings from Germany. Ricky
There is a known bug that causes back focus even when it says its in focus with the X-H2 with subject detection and its not present on spot AF or AF+MF. Maybe some XT-5 bodies have the same problem? I don't know. Btw I own an XT-4 and the only fujinon lens I own its the 23mm F2, never had any problem with that, I'm usually shooting AF+MF with focus peak.
@@diegobluc use focus priority in AF-S and AF-C and AF+MF Assist should be turned off while using AF-C cause it overrides the focus priority setting. That’s what I read in a forum some day and what really seamed to make a difference
@@kravemir I just went from an X-S20 to the Nikon Zf. I just could not consistently get tack sharp images with the Fuji. It’s a known bug and has been going on since the X-T4 launched. The X-T3 also exhibits a similar issue because it got an update to the AF system that completely changed how it works and is based on the X-T4’s AF system since they are fairly similar. It’s crazy how Fuji hasn’t acknowledged and addressed this and it’s been years. You just don’t see Nikon, Canon, and Sony making these types of mistakes
I’m so happy (and lucky) about the fact that as an artist, I don’t need to worry about autofocus and any of those technical stuff. For me, the XT-5 is all about the joy of photography. It delivers images that look and feel way more warm and organic than my previous Nikon system, and that’s all I need
@@gerardneedham that’s very relative to the type work you do. I’m a professional visual artist and the XT-5 works perfect for me, it’s even an overkill, and also, it really inspires me to go out and shoot like no other camera I’ve owned
I owned an XT30ii and ditched it because I could not focus it - either automatic or manual. I loved the camera for it's design, but hated it for performance. Switched to Sony A7ii and realised I should have done this in the first place. Of course a camera is just a tool, but I think we all agree that some tools are better than others.
I found that the default sharpening settings in Lightroom for the fuji are far softer than for my Nikons or Sonys. You can get that sharpness by tweaking your settings. Again, it's a pixel peeping thing but just something to think about. Great video Gerard!
Sadly all my Fuji bodies XT2, XH1, X100 have had expensive repairs. The 50-140 f2.8 is now not sending correct aperture to either body. The XH2 I borrowed from Fuji Australia died immediately. Great lenses optically but would never rely on the system. 50 years of Nikon - faultless
@@stanleygabrel5279 Yeah! The sensor-to-megapixel-ratio is the most important for noise. A Full Frame sensor with a very low MP count will yield great readout at high ISO with low noise, because less MP means less pixels, thus less artifacts during lowlight situations. That's why the FX3 has 10MP for example. Another example are Fuji's 24 & 26MP APS-C sensors - they're essentially 1.5x the FX3 (10MP * 1.5 crop = 25MP "equivalent", at least in terms of noise). In photography I find that the Z8 has horrible digital artifacts but you're able to push it more in editing. Fujifilm feels more natural, but because of the smaller sensor you have less room to edit.
I get better low light and even against the sun photos with less noise on my FUJI XT4, than with my older Canon 5Dsr, of course different cameras, but, I tried the same with the XH2 and same lenses. I know the difference btween those sensors, still liking more the rendition on the xt4! PS Never updated to the latest firmwares, as my autofocus works quite well for my needs as a birding photographer.
Could you please say which firmware you were using during the production of this video. The X-T5 was never on Sony level with AF-C + Subject/Tracking. But with v3.01 it got noticeably worse. They semi-fixed it with v4.00 last week. But still, on v2.10 it was much more reliable.
Nice work! Nobody talks about this, but precise manually focusing actually gives a sharper image than autofocusing on XT5, even in single mode, with a still subject, with every lens, in any light condition, it seems to be allways a hair off ( backfocusing ). Is it just my XT5 doing this. Acuracy is not lens dependent.
@@gerardneedham Let me know about your findings on this subject. Lenses I used: Fuji XF50 f2 it's the worst, sharp wide open in MF, mediocre in AF single, equals up at 2.8. Fuji xf 35 f2, slight but noticeable difference, f2.8 is the same. Sigma 56 f1.4, a bit sharper wide open in MF, sharp overall, equals up at 2.0. Sigma 30 f1.4, very noticeable difference wide open, very sharp in MF, soft with AF untill f2.8. XF 35 1.4, XF 18 f2 and XF 27 2.8 ( all old af motors ) are the best performers, no difference between MF and AF. Tests done with tripod, different distances, fixed, flat and high contrast subjects and good lighting. Didn't have new Xf18 1.4, 23, or 33 to test
Been shooting Fuji for 10 years. The latest being the XT4. Bought an A7iii on a whim and it destroyed me. Sharper images. Insane eye autofocus that doesn't miss, even on fast moving subjects. Incredible battery life (Like 1000 photos and it's still 50% or better, compared to Fuji where it's almost dead at 300 shots). Full frame goodness. I dumped Fujifilm and I'm not going back. Now I have a Sony A7C and I'm extremely happy.
I shot all night last evening 1,000 shots and I still have 60% battery (XT-5). I can't comment on AF compared to Sony. XT5 does well with eye focus and super well with face recognition, (except for that single firmware last month which has since been fixed). The sensor quality is outstanding with lots of room to crop should it be necessary. Great glass, small form factor, all big pluses. That being said if given the choice today to jump into a brand I would certainly explore all the other biggies S/C/N.
@@peterthoshinsky6468 That sounds awesome! Enjoy it, man! When you get the chance, rent a 5-year old Sony and compare the files with your XT-5 (A7iii or A7c) and you'll be shocked at the jump in quality and AF performance. Trust me, I drank the Fuji Kool Aid for a decade and decided on a whim just to try Sony and I'm glad I did.
@@yousefcreative LOL. I'm afraid to. I'm $16k plus into my Fuji kit. I earn my salary with it and it's awkward to jump ship and a heck of a lot of financial worry. Buying a full working two camera kit that I built up over a decade when I had some extra income...I have done a brand switch before, and it is $$$ painful. I priced out several two camera kits with the 24-80/120'sish 2.8 zoom, a 70-200 f2.8, a 35 prime, an 80 prime, a wide prime, maybe the 50 prime, two extra batteries, ie; a basic low light photojournalist kit with 2 bodies, 2 fast zooms and three primes, , and I'm well into the $15-20k range. Then the hassles of selling. So...I'm afraid to try Sony.
Hi Gerard. I have owend the XT5 for 2 months then sold it. You put your finger on all the problems with this system that made me came back to my canon stuff. For the look and way of shoot, I'm thinking about to buy on OM system OM5.
Coming from a Sony system for 8 years & switching to an XT5 in Dec of '23, I find the Fuji menu system very refreshing & more intuitive than Sony! The one thing I cannot explain is that my fuji XT5 makes me want to go out & shoot & create an image! My Sony felt more like a "work" camera. I totally agree that Fuji needs to up their game on the focusing system!!! If I need to hit a tack sharp focus on my subject, I switch to a single point & move the box to my subject's eye. Having to do this all the time is very annoying! I've been watching your channel for a while now & love your perspective!
Yeah epic, I personally still just use continuous auto focus eye tracking for portraits as you don’t need a tack sharp image for portraits and having a little bit of soft focus is actually quite pleasing on skin texture.
I have a slower AF GFX. Yes I miss a few shots but for posed portraits I have no major complaints using GF lenses. I would guess XT5 AF is much better than what I have. Fuji is never good in afc. Sony is the opposite. Need to know the quirks of each. Shot A7r4 and GFX50s for 2 years. Sold all Sony and went to gfx100s. And very happy.
I had a Sony once - never again! The menu was awful. I sold my Canon kit and switched to Fuji a couple of years ago and never looked back. The T range are so aesthetically pleasing they make me want to go out and take photos and I’ve therefore learned more and become a better photographer. I love the film sims so much, such fun.
@@traceybartlam7737 The newer Sony menus are better than Fuji's. Me personally I rarely need to use menus as most things get programmed to different buttons.
I'm sure it's a good camera. But it seems the autofocus gets worse for every firmware update... I've seen some videos of this issue, and the XH2S seems to be most affected by it (firmware 6 and 7.0). When I see photos taken with a Fuji camera, they often appear to be less sharp than others, as Gerard pointed out. Could be the x-trans sensor. I'm happy with my Sony cameras for now; especially when I found the Sony film simulations.
Yeah it’s ment to get better not worse 😂 I actually wait about 2 months or so before I update the firmware and just listen if there is a bug or not. That’s why I haven’t updated my A7IVs yet
Strangely enough, it has improved noticeably for me. Atleast the subject detection, I shoot mostly macro/insects and the like. Can't really say anything for sports/birds etc.
@@ickebins6948 Good for you! Yes, I think the AF is the worst for sports and fast moving subjects. The most frustrating must be the false positives; the AF shows a green box on the eye, but focus is somewhere else. Nice to hear that it's working good for you 😊
Crazy, I got an X-T5 with the 14, 23, and 50 f2 primes and that sensor is absolutely *tack sharp* when you pixel peep even with those less expensive lenses. Honestly was pretty blown away getting 40MP clarity like that out of an APS-C sensor.
I can't comment on the XT5 as I don't own one. I do shoot with an XS10, an XH1 and an XT1. I generally shoot single shot AF (though sometimes with MF assist) and over all the images I have taken (only about 10,000 over less than 2 years of ownership) I can honestly say hardly any were not in focus. Also I'm generally shooting landscapes. So, having read all the comments about AF maybe the conclusion is that the reliability depends on the use you put the camera to. I think for the average amateur it's a fine system and I just love picking up one or maybe two of my cameras and taking pics with them.
Yup it’s fine for landscapes in single shot at high f stops, but for closer working distances and lower f stops like shooting a portrait at f1.4 it’s not amazing
My main camera is A7 iv, I had bought xt5 as an inspiration and boy did it deliver, but.. it’s just unreliable. I’ve missed so many good shots because of the constant struggles with its autofocus. At the same time Sony just works with almost zero mistakes in my use cases. So I switched from xt5 to A7C II and a couple of lightweight G lenses (24 and 40) and I’m pretty happy. The autofocus is fantastic, even better than A7iv, the aesthetics of the silver version are nowhere near xt5, but it’s still looks good. I really wanted the whole concept of having fuji as a second system to work, but it’s way to frustrating to have a camera that inspires you to shoot more, but fails you on a regular basis.
Having sharpness issues with Fuji? Using lightroom or photoshop? There's your problem. Adobe doesn't render Fuji files properly. DXO Labs Pure raw or Photolab 7 works a treat. Cheers.
I recently traded in my Sony A7iv's for an X-T5 & X-T3, plus several great lenses. I film and shoot weddings. I love the images, still and video! I am sometimes frustrated by the auto focus. It's not as good as the Sony A74. But it's doable.
People complain like it misses 80% of the shots but that's not the case. I'd say about 10-15% of the shots, but yeah if Fuji could bring their AF up to speed with the other brands then they'll dominate the aps-c market
I have the X-T3 and for the most part really enjoy the camera. But the C-AF can be a concern. The biggest issue I find is that it is *very* lens dependent. Any newer lens with a Linear Motor seems to work great. However my favorite lens is the original 23mm f1.4 and it has the older focusing style. And at 1.4 it misses many photos that I try to get of my kids. Those buggers move fast.
I think the previous firmware mess up the AF on Fuji's camera, with the new firmware update it's working better, also I used to own the A74 and the xt5 is equal or better in sharpness when you get the AF right and with Fuji's sharpest lenses.
Great Video, great photos, thank you for this! There are two ways to get Fuji Raw-Files generally sharper: 1) Using Capture One instead of Lightroom (I tried this but I missed the AI-tools and Photoshop too much. But if you don't need this, Caputure One files are significally sharper than LR-Files. 2) Using DXO Pure Raw as the Raw-Converter. It's a LR-Plugin and actually the main job is to denoise but it also handels the RAW-Flies like Capure One does, so they are way sharper with any ISO. I love this workflow, cause it produces very sharp images without noise (you can go up to 10.000 ISO) while still working with LR. Disadvantage: The files are getting very big (120 MB) and it takes 10-15 sec. per file.
Totally agree about DXO Pure Raw (which I pair with Lightroom) it’s chefs kiss…I was ready to bin the Fuji system but since using the software it’s completely improved my images and saved me a hell of a lot of money on a move to Nikon or canon. Now autofocus that’s another story but it’s getting better xt6 anyone?
My X-T5 is about 18 months old (out of warranty) and is going for repair at a cost of £260 because the coating is coming off the EVF - first time I've had a problem with X-T series having owned all except the X-T1
But on their website is written: All goods are covered by our normal 12 month warranty, with the exception of New Cameras and New Lenses which come with a 2 years Warranty.
Thank you, spot on! I personally think the images of my XH2 are quite sharp when I am using the JPGs directly for edit (which I sometimes do, speeds up the workflow). Whenever I use RAW files (like mostly for my wildlife photos) I always use DXO Pure Raw, as already mentioned by others in their comments. I think the weight and size to image quality ratio is very good with Fujis APSC system.
From my findings the 425 AF points are actually used only in the "Area" mode , that's the small box. All the rest of the af modes both video and stills are using 117 af points. Anyway camera is advertised as having Phase detect but from the behaviour we can make the conclusion that is mostly using contrast af 90%
I'm sure Continuous Focus is the reason for many soft focus shots. I shoot XT3 still... and I have certainly noticed this. I tend to favour manual focus or single shot focus. I always feel that continuous focus takes shots while lens is still adjusting. I might be wrong. Its just my thoughts. 😎📷👊👍👋
honestly so torn between the a6700 and the xt5.. and the poor AF performance of the xt5 is leaning me towards Sony... but I much prefer the tilt out screen of the XT5...
Same for me. I love Fujifilm, but the AF performance is an important factor if you're shooting professionally. And for that reason I'm still struggling to choose between the XT5 and the A6700 😢
You could have all the benefits of an xt5 without its flaws in a Nikon Zf. I am still so blown away by this cam. Yes it’s heavier but it is also built way better and you can save the extra weight when using smaller lenses like f2, which is comparable to f1.4 lenses on crop sensors regarding light and field of depth. Btw did you switch fully to Fuji or just for travel? I mean do you still work with the Sony system? Because that was the main reason why I watched your videos and what you did with the raw files from it. Now your images look just like Fuji images. I am a bit oversaturated on Fuji colors. Once people switch to Fuji, their images start to look like, well, Fuji images.
I also post content regularly about fujifilm on my channel, what I don't like with these new firmware updates is, they kept getting worse with AF performance in video and photo... I started thinking that it is a software issue. I switched my XH2S to firmware 1.3, it lacks the new features but the performance of AF is a lot better than 2024. Recommend everyone to give it a go.
Yes. v3.01 which came end of April was a serious downgrade in AF performance, which got semi-fixed with v4.00 last week. That said, v2.10 is still the most reliable. I've downgraded after both updates back to v2.10 via the help of reddit.
Agree with the non-sharpness being very annoying. I got an X-H2 briefly and had to resell it within a month. Even when compared with the GR III, the X-H2 struggles with sharpness
7:48 I've been using Fujifilm for 5 years now, and I can confirm that this is one of thing that I dislike too... No matter how hard you try, the images coming out of the camera are soft.
I try to decide between the a6700 and the XT-5. I really like the idea of fujifilm cameras and so on, but that autofocus scares me. The camera will be used on trips and stuff, and one of my biggest fears is to come home from a trip with blurry images. So how bad of an issues is really the autofocus on XT-5?
For Fuji photos to be sharper, you need to stop up from 1.4 to 2 depending on the lens, also turn noise reduction to -4. For last few months there was a great AF bug that fuji released that has been resolved. It's still not the greatest AF compared with other companies.
Hi Gerard. Thank you for this excellent video! As a Nikon Z System photographer for studio, landscape and wildlife work. I'm considering either the X-T5, X-100Vll or the Nikon Zf for a "travel" camera. My major criteria are image sharpness and detail when printing 24" x 36", detail rendering, and of course, portability. When you made your prints, at what point would you see a detail difference, if any, between the X-T5 and the a7 IV? Thank you sir!
You saved me buying one. I get exactly the same autofocus issues with my X-H1 and thought I'd upgrade. No point now. I think the eye focus is crap to be honest.
I'm on the X-T5 + 27mm 2.8 and I have to say...it's the best Fuji I've ever owned...and that's the best Fuji lens I have. The 16-55 would be my second fav. Thanks for sharing ya video man, subscribed !
And I am on the xt1 😊😊 Still going still love it Though clearly all three of us interested for the future with this xt5 This guy captures some great images. Hard not to think could I get some better shots with a newer camera xt1 still sells well on e bay maybe put it towards a second hand xt5 one day Find the test is printing the photo rather than transferring to phone or tablet and pixel peeping but enjoy the dials etc and trying to create something 😊
@@jonathanseddon7704 Hi, I just gave my xt2 to my stepson, he absolutely loves it and it went with the 27mm old lens! He is slowly learning about "how to take photos" with it, and I very glad he loves it! Fuji oldies are great! In fact I am just trying to get another xt4, mine is starting to fail :)
@@ianbridges7929 Fully agree with the printing test! I am in the process of writing a book with all the birding photos, and some more scientific aspects of birding, I used to have an older Canon 5Dsr, and my xt4 images are far better than that one! Now printing will be the final test!!! :)
Glad I saw this video. Not only this but many other UA-camrs coming out about bad AF. Most likely I will stick with the purchase of a Nikon z6ii. People complain about Nikon z5 not being good but that camera only cost $999 brand new full frame vs Xt5 $1,699 brand new APSC
Nice review and great pictures. For the apparent softness of some images, as some body else already told it could be caused by lightroom, who is not optimised for the xtrans structure of the sensor. Another tip is to set to -4 the noise reduction. For Fujifilm the 0 is actually applying some noise reduction who could give some more softness to the images. The "real 0" is -4.
agree a 100% and it is easy to spot when you shoot RAW+JPEG on XT5 and upload both to lightroom and then side by side you see that your uploaded Jpeg all of the sudden looks sharper and more detailed than a RAW next to it. One thing to do is to convert the Raw file to DNG with Lightroom enhance function, that creates a better sharper raw file.
Sony a7c rocks. Beautiful images - and you can develop your own style beyond the super-sharp machined files. I've been shooting with 35mm, 40mm, and the 28-70mm by Sigma.
@@gerardneedham That sucks, prefer using my fuji cameras just because of weight/controls/colors but I own a nikon z8 too which just has amazing AF. I was looking to pick up a newer fuji to start using for work too.
Ordered one and noticed it had a tiny cosmetic defect in one corner. Contacted them to get a replacement or a discount. They sent me a new one with no need to return the one I had 😊😊 Love Fuji
The more people who are honest about the Fuji autofocus not being up to snuff, the more likely it will be fixed, at least on future models. I absolutely love the image Fuji cameras create, but it's just not a reliable tool for work.
Fujifilm X-T3 Photographer & DoP owner here: I agree, the autofocus issue it's a serious issue to fix and that's one of the reasons why I'm aiming towards Sony for future cameras for video. I find Fuji cameras slightly overpriced for some of the characteristics they offer, although, I must admit that once you go with a Fuji in the streets by your own... There's no turning back. I never leave home without my Fuji.
I agree Fuji is not on par with Sony's autofocus, that's not questionable. What I feel the problem in most cases is is that you don't need AF-C for most situations... Why would you need AF-C on a static subject where you're just shooting a burst of pictures? AF-C makes the camera work more and it's more prone to errors like those, so why go with that? Unless obviously you work with athletes or racing cars...
I think you said in the video that the 18-55 doesn't have a physical aperture ring? I does have one, it is not marked because it's variable. But, there is an aperture ring. I have an X-T3 that I bought barely used back in 2020 or 21. I haven't used it in a lot of situations that require AF-C, I usually utilize back button focus. But, I have done some things like graduation pics where I used back button focus combined with eye detect/AF-C using the old XF56mm and it did quite a good job for me. However, I'm not doing paid client work. I hope that Fuji really does get to work and fix the AF issue. I really enjoy using the X-T3, doubt I'll be buy anything anytime soon. Just not in the budget.
I purchased a 45MP Sony A7R3a with 35mm 1.4GM and although the sensor and resolution was amazing, I ended up selling it because I hated editing the files and shooting the camera felt horrible. In addition, Fuji has a certain magic about it the way it handles light rendering. I have considered GFX as a next logical step.
I get why some people love Fujifilm. I shot everything with Fuji for awhile. Yet the AF, pixel quality and ISO performance just wasn't worth it. I was compensating too much to get the results I wanted. Went to FF after and haven't looked back. Yet the enjoyment of using the cameras can't be understated.
Completely agree with the focus issue, except I am not prepared to accept the worse AF on the basis that 'you cant tell in a print'. It would be nice if Gerard could please answer the questions on here about which firmware he was using for the shoot. Good to know if the 4.00 FW update has made any tangible difference. Having used Fuji for nearly a decade now, I am drifting away because of the focus weakness. It just misses too often. The other issue is the size of the bodies. The early Fuji bodies I owned, XE1, Pro 2 and even the XT4 were of a reasonable size, and clearly smaller than an R5, but the XH2 is essentially the same size as a FF body, but cant match the autofocus. I hope they get this right
I've been thinking the same with regard to the image quality, it seems like Fuji has softer sharpness compared to other competitors, I moved over from the Canon Rebel Series as I wanted to upgrade from a 2013 camera, however, that camera was much sharper than my XT5 :/ Seems a bit sad, but I guess you get that Fuji charm :D
I'm also using Sony and Fuji and may be switching back to Fuji completely lol. The resolution on my A7Riii always amazes me even now but it looks digital, However, the old X-T10 I just bought as a travel camera is reminding me it's not all about mega pixels! PS You need to get Sony A7R, A9 cameras to get 500,000 shutter life and a nicer sound too.
Bloody hell, I’m thinking about buying the XT-5 over the Nikon Zf. I notice a lot of barely used XT-5’s for sale. What is that saying about the camera? Other than not being FF, the XT-5 has everything I look for in a camera. The 40mp is overkill though, especially for my ancient iMac. You’re photographs look great btw.
@@gerardneedham Internationally, or just in some countries? I mean that's cool if so, but I've never seen a camera in the USA with more than a 1 year warranty. All I can find with a little digging is "Limited one year warranty on all Fujifilm digital cameras from date of purchase" on the Fuji support and repair section of their website.. 🤷🏼♂
Do you think it’s a focusing issue or that with it being a smaller sensor and ultra high megapixel the camera itself is extremely susceptible to defraction?
great thoughts, I use the XH2s and XH2 and getting an XT5, agree with all you say about the Fuji kit however not sure if you have a setting out or some other issue but sharpness with Fuji native primes is as sharp if not sharper than I was getting on my Sonys, agree with missing a slight amount of critical detail but thats an APS-c to FF issue but to be honest and I'm a big pixel peeper doing commercial shoots I have found the Fujis to be more than good enough to the point I ditched all my sony gear.. but then FUJI went and screwed up the XH2s AF and wished I had kept them LOL... my only gripe is the AF and the stepping down of the aperture iris during AF like a fluttering. Nice real-world user experience so thankyou
Question: thank for mention the Tether app. I install it on Mac and connect the Fuji X100V but I might be missing something can't fin the way to make it connect to the app. One setting I had to change was to turn off the 'POWER MANAGEMENT OFF". I think I might need plugin? thanks you
I find that Fuji RAW files are better handled using DXO PhotoLab software. If you are using Lightroom or Camera RAW that may account for the sharpness problem. Adobe has never figured out how to process Fuji RAW files and it seems like they don't care.
Honestly I've tried a few Fuji cameras, the X-E3 and 4, the X-Pro 2, the X-T3 but the issue I really did find in the X-E4 especially with it being newer was the AF can be really bad compared to other brands. I shoot LUMIX FF now, but I would go back to Fuji if they came in with a solid PDAF system that locks fast and accurate. Alternatively, maybe Nikon Zf.
I've heard many complaints about some of the recent firmware updates for the X-T5 (2.10 and 3.01 exhibited worse autofocus performance, most notably), so that may have been what caught you out with that softness when the camera insisted you were in focus. Version 4.0 of the firmware was released on June 27th (it also includes Reala Ace), and I'm curious to hear if that solved that for you!
Meh camera colour science is BS, I’m making a video on this topic soon. It all comes down to white balance and Lightroom profiles but there is merit in the difference in dynamic range
@@gerardneedham I'm working with both Sony and Fuji and there is a for sure a difference in color science between both systems which is more than a different WB. You can tweak Sony files to be Fuji-alike in Lightroom with some skills but there is no way just to use presets to get the Fuji-look (this is what I was referring to).
@@ekvidi Perhaps, but missed focus is an unusable photo -- you can usually make the colours decent even if it requires some work. I'd say the a6700 has the best colours of any recent Sony, so hopefully they implement that into a much-needed A7V sooner than later.
Regarding the unsharp portrait images. You believe it could be the sensor or the autofocus. My impression of the third image is that it is back focused as you can see sharp hairs at a greater distance than the eyes/face. If this is the case for all lenses it suggests the plane of the sensor or the autofocus may be the issue rather than the sensor itself...🤔
I think it is probably just the algorithm to autofocus. The sensor on the X-T5 is very good but I think whatever they’re doing to autofocus is just not working fully yet. With hopeful firmware updates, I think the X-T5 can be much better
For me its the usage. Fujifilm teaches you on the way. it makes you have a look for a second, think about a proper film sim that would prevent all the "ill do it in post" issue. if you dont shoot every 0.5 of a second like its a fast paced event or a Japanese fashion set, go for it. U wont want to stop shooting.
Interesting Gerard, though a little worried about the sharpness problem you seem to get. A lot of the time I use the 16/80 lens and don't have a problem unless I am the cause of it. Yes do keep shooting and giving your findings.
Balanced vid. Glorious gripe on AF “false focus acquired flag”. Have experienced issue you described w/single point. Did some experimenting w/well lit foreground and background subjects having defined edges. Seems to “favor” horizontal over vertical edge subject. Tried “Dutch tilting” camera to see if it was more accurate w/a diagonal line - no difference. In fairness, manual focus w/split-screen/pentaprism works just fine. Gotta try it, Gerard. Cheers!
Nice video and delivery. Very nice. I have a couple XT5’s with the Viltrox 27 and 75 lenses and use those mainly for photos (really like these), and an XH2s with a speed booster and manual lenses. The reason I keep using Fuji is the overall image quality and colors. I use a set of LUMIX S5 II bodies for all my talking heads that require AF. I just can’t rely on Fuji’s AF for my client work. Keep up your videos. Nicely done!
I moved to Sony over 4 years ago from Fuji. TBH, I don't regret it one bit. If anything, I'm feeling that I might give Nikon a chance with their new offerings.
Their Zf is really nice and quite possibly the best camera you can get for $2k. The zfc however is rather underwhelming and I even sold my x100t for it but regret it after a month. I’m now on a griii and have 0 regrets.
came here because i was thinking about getting an xt-5 to replace my x-pro3. because of the issue of soft images, due to autofocus accuracy? due to no ibis? due to sensor size? i wasn't sure. i recently picked up a ricoh gr3 diary edition. after 2 years of fighting the xpro-3 (my dream camera) the ricoh is a breath of fresh air. it does have ibis so i thought maybe that was the reason for the soft images on my xpro-3 (although i shoot above 125th) but after seeing this video i'm more sure that the issue lies in the fujifilm focus accuracy. i was thinking of getting a gfx50sii but if the focus accuracy is the problem then that wouldn't solve my anything. honestly i would be more than happy to use the ricoh for professional work but i'm sure i would get laughed out of the building because of it's small size.
There’s apparently an issue with the High ISO Noise Reduction setting that causes a little softness/blur. I’m still testing mine out, but try setting this to -4 as it seems that it can even affect normal ISO shots. Loving my wee X-T5 and as you point out, it really gets me out shooting.
I think most XT5 users are enthusiasts and amateur photographers. What counts here is the price/performance ratio, the size, the look, the handling and the image. If I were a professional photographer, I would definitely choose a Sony/Nikon/Canon or, if the focus is more on video, the Panasonic S5IIX. However, you should never forget that photographers took excellent photos before the mirrorless era, today it is more comfortable and even amateurs can rely on the automatic mode and eye-tracking of their system camera.
Thanks for sharing. I shoot paid work on an A7iv but have a x100v for fun. I am looking between the XT5, XH2 and XH2s now. This video is definitely helping me narrow it down!
You should definitely wait until Fuji sorts out the autofocus on XH2S and XH2. The firmware 6.0 was horrendous, and they rolled out fw 7.0 and it's still horrendous. Check out the video from a UA-camr called edvard.
Be careful with X-H2s. I had this camera with FW 6.0 and switched to Lumix S5IIx. Some of my friends also switched to other brands. This camera is good, but FW is a joke
I'm an amateur, I shoot landscape, animals, street, family activities, grandkids sports. I'm considering th Xt5 and the Sony A7iv. I do 90% photography an I'm leaning towards Fugi. Would you have a recommendation?
XT5's autofocus is an archaic implementation of phase and contrast detect. Sony/Nikon/Canon employs predictive AI technology based on what image is on the screen, so Fuji is really behind the times.
It can really depend on the settings you have made on your camera, and MOST ESPECIALLY on the lens you're using. I have a Nikon D7100 which hunts & pecks to get auto-focus on the most simple, ordinary types of subject matter if you happen to be using one of their newish tinker-toy lenses. Generally speaking ... Fuji always gets 99% of everything right, which is one of the many reasons why Fuji is currently outselling all other brands in the formats which they manufacture - Above all ... Fuji has VERY pleasing color rendition if you happen to be a portrait photographer.
the true annoying thing about fujifilm is how outrageous pricing has gotten both new and used markets... some of the cameras are going for more than their retail prices now...
VERY AGREE, like I got X100S for about $650. THAT CAMERA ARE 11 FUC**N YEARS OLD
True got a FUJI X100VI almost 5 months after the order.
lol this is all brands
I bought a X-T2 in December of last year for $520 from mpb, same body on mpb, similar condition is $750 now.. crazy
Besides the hipster x100, everything else is about the same or I am missing something. GFX are selling so cheap.
It's videos like this that we all learn how many people rely heavily on auto focus. And no, I'm NOT saying that's bad or criticising anyone! Anyway, I shoot Fuji, and yes for paid work, because it's fun. And for the insane amount of creativity I have with the film sims and the RAW converter, etc. Anyway, not knocking other brands, Fuji is just more interesting to me. X-T5, X-H2s, X-H1.
Thanks for your candor in discussing the Fuji X-T5 warts and all, instead the super rosey picture that most UA-cam reviewers paint. It’s refreshing to encounter someone with actual honesty.
My pleasure!
Agreed. good to lay it outbon the table the pros and cons
I own several Sony cameras (A1, A7SIII, FX6...). The XT5 is the camera I enjoy shooting with the most when it's not paid work. I tried several times to use my Fuji cameras professionally both for photos and videos, but I came to the conclusion that the autofocus issues prevent me to have full confidence in it. The XT5 is a fantastic every day/family/travel/casual portraits camera, but I can't rely on it for paid work most of the time.
Yeah when you use Sony for work, it’s basically impossible to switch systems ahahaha
Especially for video work
Honestly fuji tracking and eye autofocus sucks for 2024 , but single box auto focus quite good for most situations
Fully agree Charles. I also find Fuji raw files suck compared to my R6ii & R5.
When will Sony shooters stop talking about auto-focus as if it is the only thing that matters? I use my Fuji XH2s more than my Canon R6II and Panasonic S5iix for weddings with excellent results. Fuji's auto-focus is no doubt not as good as Sony's, but it is good enough for any professional work. To me, image quality counts, and Fuji does not disappoint. The dynamic range alone on Fuji is enough to consider Fuji. I use my xh2s for video only.
@@nigerian-nightmare AF is not as important for video as it is for still photography... When you take a thousand photos and realize when you get home that over half of them are slightly out of focus... it's not usable for paid work
Got an XH2s a few months ago and switched to XT5. The former was a beast of a camera but I felt more creative with the XT5. And for what I need it to be, it delivers. Happy with it.
Could I ask how come? I really would love one of either one day!
@@nicocastillo2099 you do more still photography I guess?
@@petrolpoodle the dials feel more intuitive over PASM dial. I tend to fall back to my XT2 most of the time for personal use. my XH2s for more professional work
I’ve been shooting with Fujifilm professionally for the past 3 years now, and I have to agree with the autofocus issue… if they can fix that, I think many more people will seriously consider the system for pro work.
You can’t deny they make great cameras though. I think the sensor just adds a certain ‘vibe’ to shots that makes it so easy to edit in post, be it photo and video.
Ive been loving your photos mate, keep it up!
Yeah if the XT6 has the autofocus of the A7IV I’ll be one happy man, and dude if Fuji could make a full frame camera, well I’ll be over the moon
Oh Fuji AF is perfectly adequate for pro work, it's the reliability that is lacking however....
@@namnguyenngoc3966sorry to disagree, but it is not. There are a lot of issues related to Fujifilm AF besides the missed focus in shots: there is the god awful lack of linearity when racking focus (it’s always hunting and stepping), the settings are unnecessarily convoluted, it makes linear motor lenses perform below USM lenses do in 10 year old Sony bodies, and on top of that it gives false positives.
I’m a Fuji lover and I have been for a while, but I’m so glad people are finally calling Fuji AF by its name: a hot mess that can only be fixed by releasing a new mount. Oh, and by firing the entirety of the software development department. But that’s a discussion for another moment.
@@gerardneedhamfuji xt10 firmware 5.0 improve autofocus
Stop dreaming ! I shot Fuji during 8 years with an XT1 and then XT2. Even the newer released cameras seem to still have the same kind of autofocus issues. The autofocus works better on the newer models of course but it almost feels like it’s due to more powerfull and rapid processors or sensor in the case on the XH2S for example than real algorithm improvements. The failure of Fuji in delivering an autofocus on par with Sony or Canon made me switch to Sony. Also as said by others the price. When Fuji released the XH2S at £2,500 nakef body, that opened up my horizons with the a7IV in the same price range despite Sony’s tendency to overprice their own cameras (IMHO). I finally ended up with the A7RV but that’s another story 😂
Thanks for your video.
I have been using the XT-5 for several months with various lenses.
I don't have the slight blur in your photos with my XT-5.
My pictures are absolutely sharp. I use the XF 23 1.4, the Tamron 11-20 2.8, Tamron 17-70 2.8 and XF 70-300.
I didn't notice this blur on any lens. Maybe you'll have your XT-5 checked once. That doesn't seem normal to me.
Many greetings from Germany.
Ricky
There is a known bug that causes back focus even when it says its in focus with the X-H2 with subject detection and its not present on spot AF or AF+MF. Maybe some XT-5 bodies have the same problem? I don't know. Btw I own an XT-4 and the only fujinon lens I own its the 23mm F2, never had any problem with that, I'm usually shooting AF+MF with focus peak.
@@diegobluc use focus priority in AF-S and AF-C and AF+MF Assist should be turned off while using AF-C cause it overrides the focus priority setting. That’s what I read in a forum some day and what really seamed to make a difference
My X-S20 seems to have the same or similar issue. Often unnoticeable for 15x10cm prints, but enlargement/cropping shows the issue.
can you make a video what slight blur in camera like what?
@@kravemir I just went from an X-S20 to the Nikon Zf. I just could not consistently get tack sharp images with the Fuji. It’s a known bug and has been going on since the X-T4 launched. The X-T3 also exhibits a similar issue because it got an update to the AF system that completely changed how it works and is based on the X-T4’s AF system since they are fairly similar. It’s crazy how Fuji hasn’t acknowledged and addressed this and it’s been years. You just don’t see Nikon, Canon, and Sony making these types of mistakes
I’m so happy (and lucky) about the fact that as an artist, I don’t need to worry about autofocus and any of those technical stuff. For me, the XT-5 is all about the joy of photography. It delivers images that look and feel way more warm and organic than my previous Nikon system, and that’s all I need
Yeah it’s definitely a camera for fun and not a camera to rely on for work, that’s for sure
@@gerardneedham that’s very relative to the type work you do. I’m a professional visual artist and the XT-5 works perfect for me, it’s even an overkill, and also, it really inspires me to go out and shoot like no other camera I’ve owned
@@ivanpatriciovillanueva4500 you just have low standard.
@@gelade Happily for me, my clients think different
@@ivanpatriciovillanueva4500 your clients have low standard too.
I owned an XT30ii and ditched it because I could not focus it - either automatic or manual. I loved the camera for it's design, but hated it for performance. Switched to Sony A7ii and realised I should have done this in the first place. Of course a camera is just a tool, but I think we all agree that some tools are better than others.
I bought an r8 and the focus is so good maybe the Fujifilm is a bad idea for me then
I found that the default sharpening settings in Lightroom for the fuji are far softer than for my Nikons or Sonys. You can get that sharpness by tweaking your settings. Again, it's a pixel peeping thing but just something to think about. Great video Gerard!
Sadly all my Fuji bodies XT2, XH1, X100 have had expensive repairs. The 50-140 f2.8 is now not sending correct aperture to either body. The XH2 I borrowed from Fuji Australia died immediately. Great lenses optically but would never rely on the system. 50 years of Nikon - faultless
The only issue with Fuji APS-C.Aufotofucus and low light noise performance.
Low light noise performance on the X-T4/3/2 is better than Nikon Z8.
@@acidtears Really?
@@stanleygabrel5279 Yeah! The sensor-to-megapixel-ratio is the most important for noise. A Full Frame sensor with a very low MP count will yield great readout at high ISO with low noise, because less MP means less pixels, thus less artifacts during lowlight situations. That's why the FX3 has 10MP for example.
Another example are Fuji's 24 & 26MP APS-C sensors - they're essentially 1.5x the FX3 (10MP * 1.5 crop = 25MP "equivalent", at least in terms of noise).
In photography I find that the Z8 has horrible digital artifacts but you're able to push it more in editing. Fujifilm feels more natural, but because of the smaller sensor you have less room to edit.
@@stanleygabrel5279 that's a low bar tbh. nikon af is tiers below sony and canon.
I get better low light and even against the sun photos with less noise on my FUJI XT4, than with my older Canon 5Dsr, of course different cameras, but, I tried the same with the XH2 and same lenses. I know the difference btween those sensors, still liking more the rendition on the xt4! PS Never updated to the latest firmwares, as my autofocus works quite well for my needs as a birding photographer.
Could you please say which firmware you were using during the production of this video.
The X-T5 was never on Sony level with AF-C + Subject/Tracking. But with v3.01 it got noticeably worse. They semi-fixed it with v4.00 last week. But still, on v2.10 it was much more reliable.
Nice work!
Nobody talks about this, but precise manually focusing actually gives a sharper image than autofocusing on XT5, even in single mode, with a still subject, with every lens, in any light condition, it seems to be allways a hair off ( backfocusing ). Is it just my XT5 doing this. Acuracy is not lens dependent.
Yeah I should do a test on a tripod use auto focus and then use manual focus, I bet your right and the manual focus will be better
@@gerardneedham Let me know about your findings on this subject. Lenses I used: Fuji XF50 f2 it's the worst, sharp wide open in MF, mediocre in AF single, equals up at 2.8. Fuji xf 35 f2, slight but noticeable difference, f2.8 is the same. Sigma 56 f1.4, a bit sharper wide open in MF, sharp overall, equals up at 2.0. Sigma 30 f1.4, very noticeable difference wide open, very sharp in MF, soft with AF untill f2.8.
XF 35 1.4, XF 18 f2 and XF 27 2.8 ( all old af motors ) are the best performers, no difference between MF and AF. Tests done with tripod, different distances, fixed, flat and high contrast subjects and good lighting. Didn't have new Xf18 1.4, 23, or 33 to test
Been shooting Fuji for 10 years. The latest being the XT4. Bought an A7iii on a whim and it destroyed me. Sharper images. Insane eye autofocus that doesn't miss, even on fast moving subjects. Incredible battery life (Like 1000 photos and it's still 50% or better, compared to Fuji where it's almost dead at 300 shots). Full frame goodness. I dumped Fujifilm and I'm not going back. Now I have a Sony A7C and I'm extremely happy.
Being able to count on the camera to get in-focus shots is more important to me than having nicer colours out-of-camera.
I shot all night last evening 1,000 shots and I still have 60% battery (XT-5). I can't comment on AF compared to Sony. XT5 does well with eye focus and super well with face recognition, (except for that single firmware last month which has since been fixed). The sensor quality is outstanding with lots of room to crop should it be necessary. Great glass, small form factor, all big pluses. That being said if given the choice today to jump into a brand I would certainly explore all the other biggies S/C/N.
@@peterthoshinsky6468 That sounds awesome! Enjoy it, man!
When you get the chance, rent a 5-year old Sony and compare the files with your XT-5 (A7iii or A7c) and you'll be shocked at the jump in quality and AF performance. Trust me, I drank the Fuji Kool Aid for a decade and decided on a whim just to try Sony and I'm glad I did.
@@yousefcreative LOL. I'm afraid to. I'm $16k plus into my Fuji kit. I earn my salary with it and it's awkward to jump ship and a heck of a lot of financial worry. Buying a full working two camera kit that I built up over a decade when I had some extra income...I have done a brand switch before, and it is $$$ painful. I priced out several two camera kits with the 24-80/120'sish 2.8 zoom, a 70-200 f2.8, a 35 prime, an 80 prime, a wide prime, maybe the 50 prime, two extra batteries, ie; a basic low light photojournalist kit with 2 bodies, 2 fast zooms and three primes, , and I'm well into the $15-20k range. Then the hassles of selling. So...I'm afraid to try Sony.
@@peterthoshinsky6468 ah, I completely understand. Fuji is still amazing. Keep it and love it. 😁
Hi Gerard.
I have owend the XT5 for 2 months then sold it. You put your finger on all the problems with this system that made me came back to my canon stuff.
For the look and way of shoot, I'm thinking about to buy on OM system OM5.
Coming from a Sony system for 8 years & switching to an XT5 in Dec of '23, I find the Fuji menu system very refreshing & more intuitive than Sony! The one thing I cannot explain is that my fuji XT5 makes me want to go out & shoot & create an image! My Sony felt more like a "work" camera. I totally agree that Fuji needs to up their game on the focusing system!!! If I need to hit a tack sharp focus on my subject, I switch to a single point & move the box to my subject's eye. Having to do this all the time is very annoying! I've been watching your channel for a while now & love your perspective!
Yeah epic, I personally still just use continuous auto focus eye tracking for portraits as you don’t need a tack sharp image for portraits and having a little bit of soft focus is actually quite pleasing on skin texture.
I have a slower AF GFX. Yes I miss a few shots but for posed portraits I have no major complaints using GF lenses. I would guess XT5 AF is much better than what I have.
Fuji is never good in afc. Sony is the opposite. Need to know the quirks of each. Shot A7r4 and GFX50s for 2 years. Sold all Sony and went to gfx100s. And very happy.
I agree. Fujifilm camera has so much more soul than the Sony
I had a Sony once - never again! The menu was awful. I sold my Canon kit and switched to Fuji a couple of years ago and never looked back. The T range are so aesthetically pleasing they make me want to go out and take photos and I’ve therefore learned more and become a better photographer. I love the film sims so much, such fun.
@@traceybartlam7737 The newer Sony menus are better than Fuji's. Me personally I rarely need to use menus as most things get programmed to different buttons.
The autofocus problem IS A HUGE PROBLEM. We can see in the video many soft pics and breathing videos. Hope the fix that cuz the colors are unique!
nice video bro, and that picture of Ipanema, in Rio, just amazing, as a Brazilian, lots of appreciation for it! Congrats buddy
Interesting insights having to do with auto focus. Sounds to me like it still won’t be fixed in firmware.
I'm sure it's a good camera. But it seems the autofocus gets worse for every firmware update... I've seen some videos of this issue, and the XH2S seems to be most affected by it (firmware 6 and 7.0).
When I see photos taken with a Fuji camera, they often appear to be less sharp than others, as Gerard pointed out. Could be the x-trans sensor.
I'm happy with my Sony cameras for now; especially when I found the Sony film simulations.
Yes, especially video by Edvard.
Yeah it’s ment to get better not worse 😂
I actually wait about 2 months or so before I update the firmware and just listen if there is a bug or not.
That’s why I haven’t updated my A7IVs yet
@@stanleygabrel1045 Yeah, I saw that video 😂
Strangely enough, it has improved noticeably for me.
Atleast the subject detection, I shoot mostly macro/insects and the like.
Can't really say anything for sports/birds etc.
@@ickebins6948 Good for you! Yes, I think the AF is the worst for sports and fast moving subjects. The most frustrating must be the false positives; the AF shows a green box on the eye, but focus is somewhere else. Nice to hear that it's working good for you 😊
Crazy, I got an X-T5 with the 14, 23, and 50 f2 primes and that sensor is absolutely *tack sharp* when you pixel peep even with those less expensive lenses. Honestly was pretty blown away getting 40MP clarity like that out of an APS-C sensor.
I can't comment on the XT5 as I don't own one. I do shoot with an XS10, an XH1 and an XT1. I generally shoot single shot AF (though sometimes with MF assist) and over all the images I have taken (only about 10,000 over less than 2 years of ownership) I can honestly say hardly any were not in focus. Also I'm generally shooting landscapes. So, having read all the comments about AF maybe the conclusion is that the reliability depends on the use you put the camera to. I think for the average amateur it's a fine system and I just love picking up one or maybe two of my cameras and taking pics with them.
Yup it’s fine for landscapes in single shot at high f stops, but for closer working distances and lower f stops like shooting a portrait at f1.4 it’s not amazing
My main camera is A7 iv, I had bought xt5 as an inspiration and boy did it deliver, but.. it’s just unreliable. I’ve missed so many good shots because of the constant struggles with its autofocus. At the same time Sony just works with almost zero mistakes in my use cases. So I switched from xt5 to A7C II and a couple of lightweight G lenses (24 and 40) and I’m pretty happy. The autofocus is fantastic, even better than A7iv, the aesthetics of the silver version are nowhere near xt5, but it’s still looks good. I really wanted the whole concept of having fuji as a second system to work, but it’s way to frustrating to have a camera that inspires you to shoot more, but fails you on a regular basis.
Having sharpness issues with Fuji? Using lightroom or photoshop? There's your problem. Adobe doesn't render Fuji files properly. DXO Labs Pure raw or Photolab 7 works a treat. Cheers.
Yeah I’ll have to give this a go mate
I have the same problems with Luminar Neo and that's regarded as good with Fuji RAW files as Capture One.
Make a follow up video with CONTROLLED SETTINGS (static subject) between XT5 and Sony A74 & A6700 to get to the botton of the issue.
Could do 😊
I recently traded in my Sony A7iv's for an X-T5 & X-T3, plus several great lenses. I film and shoot weddings. I love the images, still and video! I am sometimes frustrated by the auto focus. It's not as good as the Sony A74. But it's doable.
People complain like it misses 80% of the shots but that's not the case. I'd say about 10-15% of the shots, but yeah if Fuji could bring their AF up to speed with the other brands then they'll dominate the aps-c market
Yeah that’s how I feel ahahaha, I personally don’t want to use Fuji for weddings as why would I make my life difficult, but man it would be fun
@@gerardneedham I don't have any problems with stills, just video tracking
I have the X-T3 and for the most part really enjoy the camera. But the C-AF can be a concern. The biggest issue I find is that it is *very* lens dependent. Any newer lens with a Linear Motor seems to work great. However my favorite lens is the original 23mm f1.4 and it has the older focusing style. And at 1.4 it misses many photos that I try to get of my kids. Those buggers move fast.
I think the previous firmware mess up the AF on Fuji's camera, with the new firmware update it's working better, also I used to own the A74 and the xt5 is equal or better in sharpness when you get the AF right and with Fuji's sharpest lenses.
Great Video, great photos, thank you for this! There are two ways to get Fuji Raw-Files generally sharper: 1) Using Capture One instead of Lightroom (I tried this but I missed the AI-tools and Photoshop too much. But if you don't need this, Caputure One files are significally sharper than LR-Files. 2) Using DXO Pure Raw as the Raw-Converter. It's a LR-Plugin and actually the main job is to denoise but it also handels the RAW-Flies like Capure One does, so they are way sharper with any ISO. I love this workflow, cause it produces very sharp images without noise (you can go up to 10.000 ISO) while still working with LR. Disadvantage: The files are getting very big (120 MB) and it takes 10-15 sec. per file.
Totally agree about DXO Pure Raw (which I pair with Lightroom) it’s chefs kiss…I was ready to bin the Fuji system but since using the software it’s completely improved my images and saved me a hell of a lot of money on a move to Nikon or canon. Now autofocus that’s another story but it’s getting better xt6 anyone?
@@tonykennedy2344 This!
Those prints are stunning! Mind sharing where you sent them for printing? Or do you have a way to print them at home?
My X-T5 is about 18 months old (out of warranty) and is going for repair at a cost of £260 because the coating is coming off the EVF - first time I've had a problem with X-T series having owned all except the X-T1
But on their website is written:
All goods are covered by our normal 12 month warranty, with the exception of New Cameras and New Lenses which come with a 2 years Warranty.
@@TechTroppy Thank you
Only 18 months for that to happen is a flaw in their manufacturing. They should really fix it for you.
Thank you, spot on!
I personally think the images of my XH2 are quite sharp when I am using the JPGs directly for edit (which I sometimes do, speeds up the workflow). Whenever I use RAW files (like mostly for my wildlife photos) I always use DXO Pure Raw, as already mentioned by others in their comments.
I think the weight and size to image quality ratio is very good with Fujis APSC system.
Did you tried the new firmware that fixes the AF issue? At least that's what many photographers share.
it got worst
4.0 is BETTER on T5, some don't know how to set up a camera or what AF mode to use
From my findings the 425 AF points are actually used only in the "Area" mode , that's the small box. All the rest of the af modes both video and stills are using 117 af points. Anyway camera is advertised as having Phase detect but from the behaviour we can make the conclusion that is mostly using contrast af 90%
Wrong
I'm sure Continuous Focus is the reason for many soft focus shots. I shoot XT3 still... and I have certainly noticed this. I tend to favour manual focus or single shot focus. I always feel that continuous focus takes shots while lens is still adjusting. I might be wrong. Its just my thoughts.
😎📷👊👍👋
There’s a config for continuous AF where it only shoots if it’s in focus. That even works for continuous shooting + AFC
@@nerdcatcafe hmmm yeagh. I remember seeing that before. Focus priority or shot priority. I'll check it out.
Thanks 👍
This.
I always use single shot af, continuous has always just been annoying to me.
honestly so torn between the a6700 and the xt5.. and the poor AF performance of the xt5 is leaning me towards Sony... but I much prefer the tilt out screen of the XT5...
Same for me. I love Fujifilm, but the AF performance is an important factor if you're shooting professionally. And for that reason I'm still struggling to choose between the XT5 and the A6700 😢
You could have all the benefits of an xt5 without its flaws in a Nikon Zf. I am still so blown away by this cam. Yes it’s heavier but it is also built way better and you can save the extra weight when using smaller lenses like f2, which is comparable to f1.4 lenses on crop sensors regarding light and field of depth.
Btw did you switch fully to Fuji or just for travel? I mean do you still work with the Sony system? Because that was the main reason why I watched your videos and what you did with the raw files from it.
Now your images look just like Fuji images. I am a bit oversaturated on Fuji colors. Once people switch to Fuji, their images start to look like, well, Fuji images.
You gotta play with white balance and exposure, that’s for all cameras
Dang those shutter issues are interesting to hear with Nikons commonly going past 800K.
Past 800k with an electronic shutter! I hate to desire to use an electronic shutter. I only use mechanical shutter.
@@gerardneedham no that’s mechanical. Same, unless it doesn’t have one like the Z8.
@@gerardneedham hahaa you definitely can with a Nikon + mechanical shutter and I'm talking before Z8-Z9 era
I also post content regularly about fujifilm on my channel, what I don't like with these new firmware updates is, they kept getting worse with AF performance in video and photo... I started thinking that it is a software issue. I switched my XH2S to firmware 1.3, it lacks the new features but the performance of AF is a lot better than 2024. Recommend everyone to give it a go.
Doesn’t the xt5 have autofocus issues right now? Something with the firmware?
Yes. v3.01 which came end of April was a serious downgrade in AF performance, which got semi-fixed with v4.00 last week. That said, v2.10 is still the most reliable. I've downgraded after both updates back to v2.10 via the help of reddit.
@@JakeChambersOyoh nice. Can you share a link? Looking for a way to roll back.
Agree with the non-sharpness being very annoying. I got an X-H2 briefly and had to resell it within a month. Even when compared with the GR III, the X-H2 struggles with sharpness
Fir the battery life you might have been in ECO mode that lowers the evf abd screen brightness and refresh rate.
Nah I’ve been using the boast mode, or what ever it’s called
I was a Fujifilm photographer a long time but, last 4 mount i took a nikon zf, nice camera but almost all days i think come back to crop system.
I am experiencing the worst autofocus on my xt5 after the update 😢 this is a nightmare.
7:48 I've been using Fujifilm for 5 years now, and I can confirm that this is one of thing that I dislike too... No matter how hard you try, the images coming out of the camera are soft.
I try to decide between the a6700 and the XT-5. I really like the idea of fujifilm cameras and so on, but that autofocus scares me. The camera will be used on trips and stuff, and one of my biggest fears is to come home from a trip with blurry images. So how bad of an issues is really the autofocus on XT-5?
What do you mean with trips? Holiday and landscape photography? Than it’s 0% an issue.
As others said, it only misses focus on detail level / pixel peep level so for holidays it wont matter much.
For Fuji photos to be sharper, you need to stop up from 1.4 to 2 depending on the lens, also turn noise reduction to -4. For last few months there was a great AF bug that fuji released that has been resolved. It's still not the greatest AF compared with other companies.
you need to use capture one for fujifilm.
Hi Gerard. Thank you for this excellent video! As a Nikon Z System photographer for studio, landscape and wildlife work. I'm considering either the X-T5, X-100Vll or the Nikon Zf for a "travel" camera. My major criteria are image sharpness and detail when printing 24" x 36", detail rendering, and of course, portability. When you made your prints, at what point would you see a detail difference, if any, between the X-T5 and the a7 IV? Thank you sir!
Is color rendering different between xt3 and xt5?
You saved me buying one. I get exactly the same autofocus issues with my X-H1 and thought I'd upgrade. No point now. I think the eye focus is crap to be honest.
I'm on the X-T5 + 27mm 2.8 and I have to say...it's the best Fuji I've ever owned...and that's the best Fuji lens I have. The 16-55 would be my second fav. Thanks for sharing ya video man, subscribed !
Couldn't agree more! I love those 2 lenses for any type of photography outside of portraits
I am still using my old xt4 , and I think it will still be in use for some more time!!! I absolutely love it!
I’m still on the truly Jurassic X-T2. But it just refuses to turn into a fossil for me. Do these things die??
And I am on the xt1 😊😊
Still going still love it
Though clearly all three of us interested for the future with this xt5
This guy captures some great images.
Hard not to think could I get some better shots with a newer camera xt1 still sells well on e bay maybe put it towards a second hand xt5 one day
Find the test is printing the photo rather than transferring to phone or tablet and pixel peeping but enjoy the dials etc and trying to create something 😊
@@jonathanseddon7704 Hi, I just gave my xt2 to my stepson, he absolutely loves it and it went with the 27mm old lens! He is slowly learning about "how to take photos" with it, and I very glad he loves it! Fuji oldies are great! In fact I am just trying to get another xt4, mine is starting to fail :)
@@ianbridges7929 Fully agree with the printing test! I am in the process of writing a book with all the birding photos, and some more scientific aspects of birding, I used to have an older Canon 5Dsr, and my xt4 images are far better than that one! Now printing will be the final test!!! :)
Glad I saw this video. Not only this but many other UA-camrs coming out about bad AF. Most likely I will stick with the purchase of a Nikon z6ii.
People complain about Nikon z5 not being good but that camera only cost $999 brand new full frame vs Xt5 $1,699 brand new APSC
Yeah FujiFilm is overpriced ahahahah
Nice review and great pictures. For the apparent softness of some images, as some body else already told it could be caused by lightroom, who is not optimised for the xtrans structure of the sensor. Another tip is to set to -4 the noise reduction. For Fujifilm the 0 is actually applying some noise reduction who could give some more softness to the images. The "real 0" is -4.
agree a 100% and it is easy to spot when you shoot RAW+JPEG on XT5 and upload both to lightroom and then side by side you see that your uploaded Jpeg all of the sudden looks sharper and more detailed than a RAW next to it. One thing to do is to convert the Raw file to DNG with Lightroom enhance function, that creates a better sharper raw file.
I use Luminar Neo and it's the same.
Sony a7c rocks. Beautiful images - and you can develop your own style beyond the super-sharp machined files. I've been shooting with 35mm, 40mm, and the 28-70mm by Sigma.
Does this review take in account the recent up date to the AF Firmware?
Yes, I think it made the autofocus worse 🤦 ahahahahah. But you get 3D tracking for video now 🙌
@@gerardneedham That sucks, prefer using my fuji cameras just because of weight/controls/colors but I own a nikon z8 too which just has amazing AF. I was looking to pick up a newer fuji to start using for work too.
Been having Fuji focus problems since the XT20…
Ordered one and noticed it had a tiny cosmetic defect in one corner. Contacted them to get a replacement or a discount. They sent me a new one with no need to return the one I had 😊😊
Love Fuji
what helps auto focus ..stop shooting 1.2....change to sensitivity 4....and up the shutter speed a bit - done!!
Mmm what’s the point of a f1.2 lens if you can’t use it?
The more people who are honest about the Fuji autofocus not being up to snuff, the more likely it will be fixed, at least on future models. I absolutely love the image Fuji cameras create, but it's just not a reliable tool for work.
Fujifilm X-T3 Photographer & DoP owner here: I agree, the autofocus issue it's a serious issue to fix and that's one of the reasons why I'm aiming towards Sony for future cameras for video.
I find Fuji cameras slightly overpriced for some of the characteristics they offer, although, I must admit that once you go with a Fuji in the streets by your own... There's no turning back. I never leave home without my Fuji.
I agree Fuji is not on par with Sony's autofocus, that's not questionable. What I feel the problem in most cases is is that you don't need AF-C for most situations... Why would you need AF-C on a static subject where you're just shooting a burst of pictures? AF-C makes the camera work more and it's more prone to errors like those, so why go with that? Unless obviously you work with athletes or racing cars...
I think you said in the video that the 18-55 doesn't have a physical aperture ring? I does have one, it is not marked because it's variable. But, there is an aperture ring. I have an X-T3 that I bought barely used back in 2020 or 21. I haven't used it in a lot of situations that require AF-C, I usually utilize back button focus. But, I have done some things like graduation pics where I used back button focus combined with eye detect/AF-C using the old XF56mm and it did quite a good job for me. However, I'm not doing paid client work. I hope that Fuji really does get to work and fix the AF issue. I really enjoy using the X-T3, doubt I'll be buy anything anytime soon. Just not in the budget.
If you are so happy with your Fuji why you do need at all a second system with a full frame sensor?
The sharpness could be a lightroom problem.. Maybe try capture one and compare the sharpness, it does make a difference if you go in 👍
Definitely agree, I found a noticeable difference (at 100%) on default settings between raw files in lightroom and the same image in dxo photolab.
@@mkting101 it's just more easy to bash, than to adapt...
It’s an Adobe issue. For Fuji raws I use Lightroom and XTransformer for important photos. The difference is enormous.
It is an Adobe problem.
I use PureRAW for noise reduction and sharpening, the sharpness increases noticeably.
@@ickebins6948 Tried that also, makes huge files, but the results are amazing 👌
I purchased a 45MP Sony A7R3a with 35mm 1.4GM and although the sensor and resolution was amazing, I ended up selling it because I hated editing the files and shooting the camera felt horrible. In addition, Fuji has a certain magic about it the way it handles light rendering. I have considered GFX as a next logical step.
Can you tell us how you print and the process? Or do you have a video like this already?
I get why some people love Fujifilm. I shot everything with Fuji for awhile. Yet the AF, pixel quality and ISO performance just wasn't worth it. I was compensating too much to get the results I wanted. Went to FF after and haven't looked back. Yet the enjoyment of using the cameras can't be understated.
Thoughts on using this camera for wildlife and landscape?
Completely agree with the focus issue, except I am not prepared to accept the worse AF on the basis that 'you cant tell in a print'. It would be nice if Gerard could please answer the questions on here about which firmware he was using for the shoot. Good to know if the 4.00 FW update has made any tangible difference. Having used Fuji for nearly a decade now, I am drifting away because of the focus weakness. It just misses too often. The other issue is the size of the bodies. The early Fuji bodies I owned, XE1, Pro 2 and even the XT4 were of a reasonable size, and clearly smaller than an R5, but the XH2 is essentially the same size as a FF body, but cant match the autofocus. I hope they get this right
I've been thinking the same with regard to the image quality, it seems like Fuji has softer sharpness compared to other competitors, I moved over from the Canon Rebel Series as I wanted to upgrade from a 2013 camera, however, that camera was much sharper than my XT5 :/ Seems a bit sad, but I guess you get that Fuji charm :D
I'm also using Sony and Fuji and may be switching back to Fuji completely lol. The resolution on my A7Riii always amazes me even now but it looks digital, However, the old X-T10 I just bought as a travel camera is reminding me it's not all about mega pixels! PS You need to get Sony A7R, A9 cameras to get 500,000 shutter life and a nicer sound too.
Yeah I might just get the new a9iii and be done with a mechanical shutter
Bloody hell, I’m thinking about buying the XT-5 over the Nikon Zf. I notice a lot of barely used XT-5’s for sale. What is that saying about the camera? Other than not being FF, the XT-5 has everything I look for in a camera. The 40mp is overkill though, especially for my ancient iMac. You’re photographs look great btw.
Sadly, it looks like in the USA we only get the crappy 1 year warranty (unless I'm missing something)... 🙄
Yeah your probably on the older cameras, the new fujis come with a 3 year warranty
@@gerardneedham Internationally, or just in some countries? I mean that's cool if so, but I've never seen a camera in the USA with more than a 1 year warranty. All I can find with a little digging is "Limited one year warranty on all Fujifilm digital cameras from date of purchase" on the Fuji support and repair section of their website.. 🤷🏼♂
Do you think it’s a focusing issue or that with it being a smaller sensor and ultra high megapixel the camera itself is extremely susceptible to defraction?
great thoughts, I use the XH2s and XH2 and getting an XT5, agree with all you say about the Fuji kit however not sure if you have a setting out or some other issue but sharpness with Fuji native primes is as sharp if not sharper than I was getting on my Sonys, agree with missing a slight amount of critical detail but thats an APS-c to FF issue but to be honest and I'm a big pixel peeper doing commercial shoots I have found the Fujis to be more than good enough to the point I ditched all my sony gear.. but then FUJI went and screwed up the XH2s AF and wished I had kept them LOL... my only gripe is the AF and the stepping down of the aperture iris during AF like a fluttering. Nice real-world user experience so thankyou
Yeah the next generation of Fuji cameras with be amazing I’m sure all this issues fixed
Question: thank for mention the Tether app. I install it on Mac and connect the Fuji X100V but I might be missing something can't fin the way to make it connect to the app. One setting I had to change was to turn off the 'POWER MANAGEMENT OFF". I think I might need plugin? thanks you
the menu is not confusing at all compare to other brand..btw the colors in this video so better than the nikon zf in the previous video i saw
Hi, the black mist is 1/8?
I find that Fuji RAW files are better handled using DXO PhotoLab software. If you are using Lightroom or Camera RAW that may account for the sharpness problem. Adobe has never figured out how to process Fuji RAW files and it seems like they don't care.
LOL it's odd I have the exact opposite experience!!! yet I love to pass my files through the older topaz Denoise.
Honestly I've tried a few Fuji cameras, the X-E3 and 4, the X-Pro 2, the X-T3 but the issue I really did find in the X-E4 especially with it being newer was the AF can be really bad compared to other brands. I shoot LUMIX FF now, but I would go back to Fuji if they came in with a solid PDAF system that locks fast and accurate. Alternatively, maybe Nikon Zf.
I've heard many complaints about some of the recent firmware updates for the X-T5 (2.10 and 3.01 exhibited worse autofocus performance, most notably), so that may have been what caught you out with that softness when the camera insisted you were in focus. Version 4.0 of the firmware was released on June 27th (it also includes Reala Ace), and I'm curious to hear if that solved that for you!
i will keep using my a6700 and buy fuji film-simulation alike presets
You will never get a Sony-like AF on a Fuji and never get Fuji-like colors on a Sony
Meh camera colour science is BS, I’m making a video on this topic soon.
It all comes down to white balance and Lightroom profiles but there is merit in the difference in dynamic range
Sony a6700 is flawless
@@gerardneedham I'm working with both Sony and Fuji and there is a for sure a difference in color science between both systems which is more than a different WB. You can tweak Sony files to be Fuji-alike in Lightroom with some skills but there is no way just to use presets to get the Fuji-look (this is what I was referring to).
@@ekvidi Perhaps, but missed focus is an unusable photo -- you can usually make the colours decent even if it requires some work. I'd say the a6700 has the best colours of any recent Sony, so hopefully they implement that into a much-needed A7V sooner than later.
Regarding the unsharp portrait images. You believe it could be the sensor or the autofocus. My impression of the third image is that it is back focused as you can see sharp hairs at a greater distance than the eyes/face. If this is the case for all lenses it suggests the plane of the sensor or the autofocus may be the issue rather than the sensor itself...🤔
I think it is probably just the algorithm to autofocus. The sensor on the X-T5 is very good but I think whatever they’re doing to autofocus is just not working fully yet. With hopeful firmware updates, I think the X-T5 can be much better
For me its the usage. Fujifilm teaches you on the way. it makes you have a look for a second, think about a proper film sim that would prevent all the "ill do it in post" issue.
if you dont shoot every 0.5 of a second like its a fast paced event or a Japanese fashion set, go for it. U wont want to stop shooting.
Hi question about the softness of the XT5: What software did you use to open or edit the raw files?
Pretty shocked. Usually, my x files are too sharp, and I need to ease down the clarity to around -5 to 10
Pretty sure this is a focusing issue with the new models. Which makes me a bit worried for the future of Fuji…
Interesting Gerard, though a little worried about the sharpness problem you seem to get. A lot of the time I use the 16/80 lens and don't have a problem unless I am the cause of it. Yes do keep shooting and giving your findings.
OH man I really have been wanting to do some bigger prints!? Are you using a service? or have something at home?
Balanced vid. Glorious gripe on AF “false focus acquired flag”. Have experienced issue you described w/single point. Did some experimenting w/well lit foreground and background subjects having defined edges. Seems to “favor” horizontal over vertical edge subject. Tried “Dutch tilting” camera to see if it was more accurate w/a diagonal line - no difference.
In fairness, manual focus w/split-screen/pentaprism works just fine. Gotta try it, Gerard. Cheers!
Yeah I want to try out a manual lens on the XT5, maybe soon
Nice video and delivery. Very nice.
I have a couple XT5’s with the Viltrox 27 and 75 lenses and use those mainly for photos (really like these), and an XH2s with a speed booster and manual lenses.
The reason I keep using Fuji is the overall image quality and colors. I use a set of LUMIX S5 II bodies for all my talking heads that require AF.
I just can’t rely on Fuji’s AF for my client work.
Keep up your videos. Nicely done!
I moved to Sony over 4 years ago from Fuji. TBH, I don't regret it one bit. If anything, I'm feeling that I might give Nikon a chance with their new offerings.
Their Zf is really nice and quite possibly the best camera you can get for $2k. The zfc however is rather underwhelming and I even sold my x100t for it but regret it after a month. I’m now on a griii and have 0 regrets.
Yeah I’ll be close behind you to test out Nikon to replace my Sonys
came here because i was thinking about getting an xt-5 to replace my x-pro3. because of the issue of soft images, due to autofocus accuracy? due to no ibis? due to sensor size? i wasn't sure. i recently picked up a ricoh gr3 diary edition. after 2 years of fighting the xpro-3 (my dream camera) the ricoh is a breath of fresh air. it does have ibis so i thought maybe that was the reason for the soft images on my xpro-3 (although i shoot above 125th) but after seeing this video i'm more sure that the issue lies in the fujifilm focus accuracy. i was thinking of getting a gfx50sii but if the focus accuracy is the problem then that wouldn't solve my anything. honestly i would be more than happy to use the ricoh for professional work but i'm sure i would get laughed out of the building because of it's small size.
There’s apparently an issue with the High ISO Noise Reduction setting that causes a little softness/blur. I’m still testing mine out, but try setting this to -4 as it seems that it can even affect normal ISO shots. Loving my wee X-T5 and as you point out, it really gets me out shooting.
The sharpness settings are not effecting raw files.
I think most XT5 users are enthusiasts and amateur photographers. What counts here is the price/performance ratio, the size, the look, the handling and the image. If I were a professional photographer, I would definitely choose a Sony/Nikon/Canon or, if the focus is more on video, the Panasonic S5IIX. However, you should never forget that photographers took excellent photos before the mirrorless era, today it is more comfortable and even amateurs can rely on the automatic mode and eye-tracking of their system camera.
That’s exactly correct
Thanks for sharing. I shoot paid work on an A7iv but have a x100v for fun. I am looking between the XT5, XH2 and XH2s now. This video is definitely helping me narrow it down!
You should definitely wait until Fuji sorts out the autofocus on XH2S and XH2. The firmware 6.0 was horrendous, and they rolled out fw 7.0 and it's still horrendous. Check out the video from a UA-camr called edvard.
XT5 is the best if your in the Sony ecosystem for work. Best to just own that with 2 lenses or a zoom for fun
Be careful with X-H2s. I had this camera with FW 6.0 and switched to Lumix S5IIx. Some of my friends also switched to other brands. This camera is good, but FW is a joke
@@infantfrontender6131 Thats what I have been seeing. I think I will wait. I have a A7iv so I am in no rush lol
I'm an amateur, I shoot landscape, animals, street, family activities, grandkids sports. I'm considering th Xt5 and the Sony A7iv. I do 90% photography an I'm leaning towards Fugi. Would you have a recommendation?
is your shutter release set to 'focus'?
XT5's autofocus is an archaic implementation of phase and contrast detect. Sony/Nikon/Canon employs predictive AI technology based on what image is on the screen, so Fuji is really behind the times.
It can really depend on the settings you have made on your camera, and MOST ESPECIALLY on the lens you're using. I have a Nikon D7100 which hunts & pecks to get auto-focus on the most simple, ordinary types of subject matter if you happen to be using one of their newish tinker-toy lenses. Generally speaking ... Fuji always gets 99% of everything right, which is one of the many reasons why Fuji is currently outselling all other brands in the formats which they manufacture -
Above all ... Fuji has VERY pleasing color rendition if you happen to be a portrait photographer.
try dxo instead of lightroom, it will extract more from x-trans sensor