I 100% agree. I have a Great Pyrenees. There is no way I would put her in that situation. Now if I could be 100%sure we could be alone and no other dogs would be there I might let her run for a bit. But since I can't she has to wait for the pen to be built.
Same here! We have a great park, but I have a smallish dog who’s great with dogs who have come to our home. But I’ve watched too many of these cases to feel comfortable not knowing who is going to show up and how they will interact.😢
I believe him too. The ultra happy face she made at the end made me sick! She looks like the type of person who just wants money. And to boot, she wanted more?! I was hoping she would lose. It's her fault for taking her dog to the park and letting it play with other dogs!
The staph infection she 100% has him dead to rights on because the vet determined it and put it in writing that the infection was directly caused by the wound made from his dog. That's why Judge Milian asked if the plaintiff had the vet paperwork that specifically stated that on it, to prove that part of her case. The ONLY way the defendant could have got out of that is if he could somehow PROVE she was negligent in caring for the wound with evidence AND have his own veterinarian expert witness to contest her vet's statement... And even then, it would still be up to Judge Milian to decide who to believe from there.
@@sashabenoit1518 Actually, I don’t remember that at all. She said the dog developed a staph infection and the judge asked if she had proof in the vet records that the dog had a staph infection. I don’t remember it being said that the vet said the staph infection was directly from the other dog/injury, only that their was one. Do you have a time stamp where the plaintiff said the vet confirmed it was from the other dog? Many staph infections are either picked up from the vet office or from the wound becoming dirty during the healing process. Edit: I just went back and listened and she didn’t say it was specifically from the other dog, only that there was an infection. I also made a mistake and said staph when it was strep.
The fact that she’s trying to sue for a broken foot makes me believe the defendant more. That his dog didn’t actually Bite with two puncture marks, that the animals did collide and somehow, whether that’s by wrestling and a nail scraped her dog or what, that it was an accident. She clearly doesn’t watch her dog in the park or at home that a speaker falls on him while he’s, healing and Sick.
How does the plaintiff know EXACTLY what happened if she noticed her dog coming over out of the corner of her eye? And I wonder why the judge didn't question her about that🤨🤨🤨
I don't think the defendant should have paid anything. It's a dog park and things happen. It looks more like what he said. I can't believe she called him a menace when he sent her a check for 1200 and she refused it. Sounds like he was trying to do the right thing and she was the difficult one.
The judge is funny and fickle. The plaintiff came in guised as a “nice” Karen smiling at the judge and well dressed and well spoken enough to tune the judge into her so she chose to award the plaintiff instead. That’s how she rolls.
What's the point of going to a dog park if it's gonna be leashed?; they can't play or run if they're leashed! The owner of the aggressive dog is at fault , for taking an aggressive dog animals to a public, dog park. I live next to a dog 🐶 park.. never seen a dog on. A leash. Because the point of being at a dog park is that the dogs are free to run around and play( not be leashed.
8:01 ...also I'm suing him for my car accident... If my dog was not injured, I wouldn't have had a reason to drive my dog to the vet, and have gotten into a car accident by driving so fast... 😮
I’m a Mail Carrier and was attacked by a dog last year, I had my calf ripped off and had 37 stitches. I also have a fear reactive golden retriever. Even before my dog and his behaviors and my attack, there’s no way on earth I’d ever take my dog to a dog park. It’s a high stress, high anxiety, high excitement atmosphere and even if you know YOUR dog and his behaviors, you don’t know the 20 other dogs and their history. I feel bad for owners who’s dogs are victims of a dog park injury, but you’re assuming an insane amount of liability taking your dog in a dog park.
I agree, and I'm so sorry that happened to you. I don't know what breed ripped your calf off, but I've read lots of news articles about pit bulls biting and mauling delivery people.
German shepherds CAN do very serious damage when they attack. This sounds like an accident. No way was the defendant liable for a broken toe. I wish the remainder of Vet bill could have been split between them.
I was bit in the thigh by a shepherd mix. The bite was massive, awful bruising, and was infected within days. Left with a huge scar, but if it weren’t for my mastiff mix going after the other dog, it could have been much worse.
I agree too that it was an accident. I have 2 dogs. 1 pitbull the other half pitbull. And when they play. They raise hell. Sometimes they nip at eachother a little too hard and break the skin. No yelps either. They just continue playing and chasing eachother. No aggression. Just play rough. So I believe maybe they were playing to rough. Not aggressive. I'm glad her dogs okay but the toe bill was a little much for her to ask for.
May be rough play and not aggressive but defendant is liable. When you have dogs in a dog park, rough play isn’t going to be tolerated by many people.@@chr3ist0ina
Why does it being an "accident" mean the defendant should only have to pay half? 👀 No one gets to pay half in car accidents And you're wrong - it was an obvious act of aggression. Calling it an "accident" just because the dog wasn't torn in half 🙄
I’m confused the last case I watched was a dog bit in the dog park and the judge awarded 0 to both, is this on different because of the strict liability law in their state?
ps in the old days, veterinarians would NEVER suture a dog bite. Even with the drain, you almost ALWAYS get an abscess.....so we would leave the wound open, and immediately give antibiotics. We never had the problems that this woman had.
Well here what I just googled, “California is one of the states with “strict liability” laws that make pet owners responsible for most dog-bite and related injuries.” Damn! Muzzle time.
Took our dog once to a dog park called the Bruce Pit and saw the large varieties of pooches playing there, my guy is a Shipoo and very friendly. The same cannot be said for all the dogs in the park. I found it not to be a really safe space and needless to say I never took him there again! Better to be safe than sorry!
I don't understand the concept of dog parks. If your dog is off-leash it's an accident waiting to happen. Seems it would be an at-your-own-risk situation. How can the law hold someone responsible when the animals in the park are just free to run and play?
Last time I took my two female dogs to a dog park, they kept getting chased and humped by another larger not neutered male dog. We had our dogs on leashes as we walked a path. Dog parks are fenced but it doesn't mean let your dogs run free to roam and hump whatever they want! After I found the dog owner, I told her that her dog is not neutered and is humping my female dogs, and she says "Oh he does that all the time!" and laughed. 😢 Never went back!
Defendant, it was a tooth snag ! Then makes a statement saying he doesn’t know what a tooth snag is? Plaintiff trying to go to the cookie jar again for a broken toe is just wrong and she needs to be content with what she received!
Pet owners, please pay for pet insurance! It costs about $100 per month, but if there is an accident or illness, they will pay for 70-80% of the bill! This woman could have gotten the full amount paid for by having pet insurance pay for 70% and the defendant pay for the remainder 30%. Pet insurance is a must for all pet owners!
ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY FOR PET INSURANCE. The loopholes they will give to not pay for your pet are worse than people insurance companies. These pet insurance companies are notorious rip-offs. If you can pay $100 per month, you can put $100 per month in savings to pay for a potential emergency. If you can't, use CareCredit to work out payment plans. DO NOT pay pet insurance.
This sounds like an accident. I mean the GSD didn't try to fight. They usually muzzle Greyhounds at the park because they collide with other dogs and teeth can cause this injury.
I agree that she foolishly allowed the dog to get reinjured in her home. The defendant should get his dog to stop using it's mouth even if it was just playing.
She said she didn’t see the bite she just saw something was wrong. Then the judge said she said she saw the bite which she didn’t say that. I think that he was right the dogs ran in to each other it didn’t look like a bite and the fair thing would of been 50/50 on the $1400 sense it wasn’t an attack and it was 2 dogs playing
@@mnschoen No when YOU enter a dog park and take ur dog off the leash n let em out of ur control u except the consequences... That's posted at all the dog parks I've ever been to... Like when u play football u can't turn around and sue later when u get hurt... U were playing too... Dog parks are the dumb anyway of course a bunch of random dogs off a leash are going to end up fighting eventually and the owners are always like 😯 And ya I watched the case n heard the ruling but the judge is wrong because watch this... What did the bigger dog owner do that was "negligent" exactly?... Have his dog off the leash? As u probably so eloquently put it... All the dogs are off the leash ya?
She lied.. She couldn’t have seen the other dog bite hers.. she said she saw her dog get growled at, run away and then get chased by his dog. But the next words are “out of the corner of my eye”.. so what was it? Did she see it happen and then stop looking? Or did she never see it and only saw the dog approach “out of the corner of her eye” after the (assumed) attack?
@trekgirl65 lol I've heard of people that have trained dogs that go to dig parks and still get into dog fights . Unless ur Caesar Milan you have no business taking ur dog to a dog park 😅
You're wrong. Since 2005 after he socializes a dog Cesar Millian takes clients with their dog to the dog parks. He advises them that the first time you take them see how many dogs are in there and if they all have a calm energy then you can bring your dog in. If the energy is too hyper and you see scuffles going on then stay out. In those cases you can keep your dog outside the park and walk it around the perimeter. The dogs in the park are very curious about the new dog outside the fence and will come to it. Now walk your dog to meet them and correct your dog (leash pull) if he charges at the fence. Keep doing that until your dog doesn't charge. He learns to walk slowly to the fence, head low (submission) to meet and sniff his new friends at the fence. Eventually the day will come for you to bring the dog in. Use common sense.
😃 1.) I didn't .. I copy and paste 2.) you said "unless you're Cesar Millan".... you're saying people can't bring dogs to the park instead of offering a solution like I am to watch his show.@@Bebedollie
I find it very troubling that he tried to get her to call the dog warden to retract her statement in return for him paying the vet bill. I believe that's extortion
As another commenter said: "Sounds like he was trying to do the right thing and she was the difficult one." It was an accident and he took responsibility. If anything, she tried to extort him, by demanding a huge & changing amount of money...and I suppose calling the "dog warden" in the first place.
@@private464Agree. Sounds like an accident and the laceration didn’t look like a bite. It did look like a snagged tooth that tore because they were running. I think she reported his dog to try to get him to pay
@@oldageisdumb Exactly. She tried to get his dog labeled as a vicious dog that would have to be muzzled at all times by law. That is so unreasonable when there was no viciousness involved. No growling, barking, or fighting. Just running & playing and then a yelp.
@@trekgirl65Actually, the pictures make it pretty clear that it wasn’t an attack. That does not at all look like a dog bite. It looks like they were running, collided, and the shepherd’s tooth snagged the thinner skin of the other dog and tore it. She reported to guy’s dog to try to bully him into paying her the money
I didn't realize that German Shepherds got a bad wrap. That's interesting! But then, I'm one that isn't bothered by any dogs. Yes! You heard me right! I do not fear even dogs that growl at me. Go ahead and call me stupid. I don't care.
@@labradoriteatheartActually, in this case you are incorrect. OP was trying to say “a bad rap”, which is a correct use of the term, but spelled rap wrong
German Sheps and Belgian Malnois protect the public from horrible criminals by assisting law enforcement and by finding surviviors buried in earthquakes.
debra .. i rehab dogs to stop aggression. If someones dog is growling/barking at you please do NOT give them eye contact or speak to them. Slowly turn around and be calm. They will stop it!😃
Her comparing him talking about the damage of a german shepard and demostic violence are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS. When she does dog cases, it shows how uneducated she is.
I just accidentally watched something called Watcha Eatin about a pitbull eating a puppy and she was laughing and yelling at the puppy owner. She must be guilty of something like that herself. What a pile of trash.
Judge in most cases: we don't judge the dog, we judge the owner. Judge in this case: let's judge the dog reacting to another dog, both off leash. Ya basic, JM.
Wait what state is this? Ive seen the judge rule against plaintiff saying dog parks are free for all unless the defendants dog has bitten others before.
OK BECKY WAS REACHING W/ THE BROKEN TOE & SPEAKER LIKE REALLY BUT HAPPY THAT SHE HAD ALL THE MEDICAL RECORDS 1ST PERSON YET THAT I'VE SEEN. THE DEFENDANT SEEMS LIKE A ASSSS VERY DISMISSIVE GLAD SHE WON
I believe the defendant i owned a GSD and they will do more than one little cut when they bite sounds like an accident they collided dog went rolling and git cut. If the GSD was bitten why didn’t they bring up about rabies and shots for the GSD
Love how the judge didnt even acknowledge that he tried to pay her. I get that the state law makes him liable 100%, but morally shes at least 50% liable since they both decided to let the dogs loose, besides he tried to make good on it to some extent and she refused. She was out to get as much as possible. Silly.
I'm glad the plaintiff got the judgement for the bite but not for the broken toe which was her fault. It's hard to know exactly what happened but two dogs that are socialized properly will not use their mouth. It's possible the Shep is dominant and tried to side mount the Visla. They both need lessons online about dog park tips, socializing, etc.
this tantrum throwing fake judge fits the profile of someone who has let her own dogs hurt people. She's setting a precedent that pitbulls and other dangerous dogs don't need to be under anyone's control if they're in a fenced area. She's probably got a yard full of them, just waiting for some dumb kid to lose his frisbee...
C'mon folks! Don't take your dogs to a dog park! They are just a dog fight waiting to happen. It doesn't matter how well your dog is socialized. Dogs are dogs. I've had dogs all my life (German Shepherds too, mostly). I would never ever take my very much loved babies to a place where they could be hurt.
So many years ago owning dogs was really fun and they took care of themselves never had these types of problems in our generations NOW PEOPLE ARE JUST WAY TOO SERIOUS and CONTROLLING WITH PETS
Hang on...judge usually thinks "dogs are not people, that's why we punish the people and not the dog" but in this case she directly compares the damage a dog can do to a domestic abuser excusing his own behavior? I...WHAT? As the judge as has previously noted...people are not dogs. Dogs are dogs and do dog behavior. This dog's behavior was a snap to tell the little dog to f*ck off. I believe him. If a German Shepherd attacked, that woman's dog would be mincemeat. On the other hand: yup, sorry. You go to a dog park and let your dog loose, all bets are off. That little nip will cost you.
I walk dogs and I will go around parks if people aren’t following the leash law because I was forewarned the dog I walk doesn’t like dogs I don’t go walking in and say eh if they bite it will be their fault they’re off leash .
Did I understand correctly that some of your clients ask you to walk their dogs that are unsocialized? They are depriving their dog of the joy/exhilaration of doggie friends. Those clients should watch Cesar Milan The Dog Whisperer or other free shows to fulfill their responsibilty to their dog.😀
The Plaintiff got a bit to greedy with her case. I myself don't believe it was a viscous attack. This happens all the time at Dog Parks and owners play apart of safety issues with their dogs KNOWING dogs are running wild w/out leashes..I think dog parks are gross and breeding ground for parasites
Why I have 4 dogs and I keep them at home so if something happens I know who is responsible! Just like parents with children , The parent ( owner of the dog) are the issue not the dogs themselves!!
That’s why I’ve never taken my dog to a dog park. Interacting with other random dogs is just a disaster waiting to happen.
EXACTLY!!
I 100% agree. I have a Great Pyrenees. There is no way I would put her in that situation. Now if I could be 100%sure we could be alone and no other dogs would be there I might let her run for a bit. But since I can't she has to wait for the pen to be built.
Same. The rare times I’ve gone it’s been when nobody else is there.
Same here! We have a great park, but I have a smallish dog who’s great with dogs who have come to our home. But I’ve watched too many of these cases to feel comfortable not knowing who is going to show up and how they will interact.😢
💯
I believe him. I don’t know why. Things like that happen. And her suing for a speaker falling on her dog shows what kind of person she is
I believe him too. The ultra happy face she made at the end made me sick! She looks like the type of person who just wants money. And to boot, she wanted more?! I was hoping she would lose. It's her fault for taking her dog to the park and letting it play with other dogs!
Anybody who takes their dogs to a dog park should do so at their own risk. I would never ever take my furbabies to a dog park.
so who gets to go, only people with big scary dogs, or...?
@alanmalcheski8882 I think anyone who doesn't care about their dogs should, by all means, go. AT THEIR OWN RISK.
@@doggoneme3863 So only people who don't care about their dogs, then. Well that's a nice way to have a society. smh
As a mother of 3 she should really learn to secure her furniture, could've been her kid's foot
Valid point!
Regardless of if it was an attack or not, she’s pretty ridiculous with what she’s suing for. I don’t even think she can pin the strep infection on him
The staph infection she 100% has him dead to rights on because the vet determined it and put it in writing that the infection was directly caused by the wound made from his dog. That's why Judge Milian asked if the plaintiff had the vet paperwork that specifically stated that on it, to prove that part of her case.
The ONLY way the defendant could have got out of that is if he could somehow PROVE she was negligent in caring for the wound with evidence AND have his own veterinarian expert witness to contest her vet's statement... And even then, it would still be up to Judge Milian to decide who to believe from there.
@@sashabenoit1518 Actually, I don’t remember that at all. She said the dog developed a staph infection and the judge asked if she had proof in the vet records that the dog had a staph infection. I don’t remember it being said that the vet said the staph infection was directly from the other dog/injury, only that their was one. Do you have a time stamp where the plaintiff said the vet confirmed it was from the other dog? Many staph infections are either picked up from the vet office or from the wound becoming dirty during the healing process. Edit: I just went back and listened and she didn’t say it was specifically from the other dog, only that there was an infection. I also made a mistake and said staph when it was strep.
The fact that she’s trying to sue for a broken foot makes me believe the defendant more. That his dog didn’t actually Bite with two puncture marks, that the animals did collide and somehow, whether that’s by wrestling and a nail scraped her dog or what, that it was an accident. She clearly doesn’t watch her dog in the park or at home that a speaker falls on him while he’s, healing and Sick.
How does the plaintiff know EXACTLY what happened if she noticed her dog coming over out of the corner of her eye? And I wonder why the judge didn't question her about that🤨🤨🤨
Probably because the judge is politically biased against German Shepard's 😂😂😂😂
I don't think the defendant should have paid anything. It's a dog park and things happen. It looks more like what he said. I can't believe she called him a menace when he sent her a check for 1200 and she refused it. Sounds like he was trying to do the right thing and she was the difficult one.
exactly...in other states, he wouldn't have had to pay anything. that's what Harvey said at the end.
Nope, he was a creepy, troll
@@VladmirPoopNNope, she’s creepy
The judge is funny and fickle. The plaintiff came in guised as a “nice” Karen smiling at the judge and well dressed and well spoken enough to tune the judge into her so she chose to award the plaintiff instead. That’s how she rolls.
I didn't think the plaintiff would win anything, because an off leash dog park should be an "at your own risk" place.
That's what I was thinking. Doesn't the owner have to be neglectful in some way to have damages awarded?
Same here. I was waiting for her, What did the owner do wrong? speech. I guess it’s the law of their state.
It was mentioned a couple of times that in their state there is strict liability. There might have been shared liability in some other states.
Yep, I was confused. Why is it not her fault? And I actually like the defendant he didn't seem like a bad person
What's the point of going to a dog park if it's gonna be leashed?; they can't play or run if they're leashed! The owner of the aggressive dog is at fault , for taking an aggressive dog animals to a public, dog park. I live next to a dog 🐶 park.. never seen a dog on. A leash. Because the point of being at a dog park is that the dogs are free to run around and play( not be leashed.
8:01 ...also I'm suing him for my car accident... If my dog was not injured, I wouldn't have had a reason to drive my dog to the vet, and have gotten into a car accident by driving so fast... 😮
I never go to dog parks this stuff happens all the time there
I’m a Mail Carrier and was attacked by a dog last year, I had my calf ripped off and had 37 stitches. I also have a fear reactive golden retriever. Even before my dog and his behaviors and my attack, there’s no way on earth I’d ever take my dog to a dog park. It’s a high stress, high anxiety, high excitement atmosphere and even if you know YOUR dog and his behaviors, you don’t know the 20 other dogs and their history. I feel bad for owners who’s dogs are victims of a dog park injury, but you’re assuming an insane amount of liability taking your dog in a dog park.
I agree, and I'm so sorry that happened to you. I don't know what breed ripped your calf off, but I've read lots of news articles about pit bulls biting and mauling delivery people.
At first I thought you said a Golden Retriever attacked you and I was shocked! 🥴 I’m so sorry that happened to you!
Your comment makes a lot of sense.
German shepherds CAN do very serious damage when they attack. This sounds like an accident. No way was the defendant liable for a broken toe. I wish the remainder of Vet bill could have been split between them.
I was bit in the thigh by a shepherd mix. The bite was massive, awful bruising, and was infected within days. Left with a huge scar, but if it weren’t for my mastiff mix going after the other dog, it could have been much worse.
I agree too that it was an accident. I have 2 dogs. 1 pitbull the other half pitbull. And when they play. They raise hell. Sometimes they nip at eachother a little too hard and break the skin. No yelps either. They just continue playing and chasing eachother. No aggression. Just play rough. So I believe maybe they were playing to rough. Not aggressive. I'm glad her dogs okay but the toe bill was a little much for her to ask for.
May be rough play and not aggressive but defendant is liable. When you have dogs in a dog park, rough play isn’t going to be tolerated by many people.@@chr3ist0ina
Why does it being an "accident" mean the defendant should only have to pay half? 👀
No one gets to pay half in car accidents
And you're wrong - it was an obvious act of aggression. Calling it an "accident" just because the dog wasn't torn in half 🙄
@@VladmirPoopNWhere did you get it was an obvious act of aggression? It was two dogs acting like dogs and they can accidentally hurt each other.
It does look like an accident. If it was deliberate it would’ve been deep.
I would NEVER take my dog to a dog park.
Why don't they build all dog parks with separate sections for small dogs.That guy is mad suspecg he got a good dose of karma
I’m confused the last case I watched was a dog bit in the dog park and the judge awarded 0 to both, is this on different because of the strict liability law in their state?
ps in the old days, veterinarians would NEVER suture a dog bite. Even with the drain, you almost ALWAYS get an abscess.....so we would leave the wound open, and immediately give antibiotics. We never had the problems that this woman had.
shes just waitin on her next payday by taking her dog back to the park
It appears from the description, the announcer's embellishment is surprising to the plaintiff .
this fake judge is a piece of garbage.
It does, doesn't it
The plantiffs tend to write their statements before the show
Come on , the plaintiffs don't write their own statements , the producers do .@@homunculus7
Never inflict a dog park on your dog.
That women seems like a word that I don't want to write.
She is full of it and the judge was definitely biased.
I guess you didn’t see the dog’s injuries.
@@BeKind2AllKinds that has zero to do with the case.
If I had a dog I wouldn’t go to a dog park
She's trying to score some cash with a blown up lawsuit.
Well here what I just googled, “California is one of the states with “strict liability” laws that make pet owners responsible for most dog-bite and related injuries.” Damn! Muzzle time.
Great! All states should have a law like that.
Took our dog once to a dog park called the Bruce Pit and saw the large varieties of pooches playing there, my guy is a Shipoo and very friendly. The same cannot be said for all the dogs in the park. I found it not to be a really safe space and needless to say I never took him there again! Better to be safe than sorry!
I don't understand the concept of dog parks. If your dog is off-leash it's an accident waiting to happen. Seems it would be an at-your-own-risk situation. How can the law hold someone responsible when the animals in the park are just free to run and play?
Last time I took my two female dogs to a dog park, they kept getting chased and humped by another larger not neutered male dog. We had our dogs on leashes as we walked a path. Dog parks are fenced but it doesn't mean let your dogs run free to roam and hump whatever they want! After I found the dog owner, I told her that her dog is not neutered and is humping my female dogs, and she says "Oh he does that all the time!" and laughed. 😢 Never went back!
👀 WOW
It’s a Hungarian dog lady!!!!!!You have no business owning him if you don’t know the history.
Dog parks are where lawsuits get born.
The one case where the owner is trying to take some responsibility. The plaintiff goes and get ridiculously greedy.
The defendant needed to realize he’s responsible for damage his dog does to another animal, whether it’s by accident or through aggression.
Defendant, it was a tooth snag ! Then makes a statement saying he doesn’t know what a tooth snag is? Plaintiff trying to go to the cookie jar again for a broken toe is just wrong and she needs to be content with what she received!
He never said it was a tooth snag she said he said it was.
Because he never said it...she did.
Pet owners, please pay for pet insurance! It costs about $100 per month, but if there is an accident or illness, they will pay for 70-80% of the bill! This woman could have gotten the full amount paid for by having pet insurance pay for 70% and the defendant pay for the remainder 30%. Pet insurance is a must for all pet owners!
ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY FOR PET INSURANCE. The loopholes they will give to not pay for your pet are worse than people insurance companies. These pet insurance companies are notorious rip-offs. If you can pay $100 per month, you can put $100 per month in savings to pay for a potential emergency. If you can't, use CareCredit to work out payment plans. DO NOT pay pet insurance.
This sounds like an accident. I mean the GSD didn't try to fight.
They usually muzzle Greyhounds at the park because they collide with other dogs and teeth can cause this injury.
Dog parks are not a great idea at all.
This women definitely doesn't need a dog.
I agree that she foolishly allowed the dog to get reinjured in her home. The defendant should get his dog to stop using it's mouth even if it was just playing.
Plaintiff is a Karen. It's a hunting dog, they're tough. Stop treating it like it's a poodle.
Judge u were completely out of line for comparing his testimony to domestic violence! We’re talking about dogs!
So, somehow to you, other living, sentient beings are less important than humans? I’d argue they are MORE important. Humans suck.
Violence against something smaller is violence it doesn’t matter what it is. A person can pick up a phone and get help
My cat Mayhem had that same gash on him once & it was b/c he got snagged on a fence & I saw it happen.
She said she didn’t see the bite she just saw something was wrong. Then the judge said she said she saw the bite which she didn’t say that. I think that he was right the dogs ran in to each other it didn’t look like a bite and the fair thing would of been 50/50 on the $1400 sense it wasn’t an attack and it was 2 dogs playing
I think if her dog was not on a leash it's her fault....
None of the dogs are on a leash; it’s a dog park. 😂
@@BeKind2AllKinds And that means she assumed the risk... Fkn duh
@@johnathandouglas007 Except "strict liability" means that if no dog was on a leash, the dog who caused the wound and it's owner are at fault. Fkn duh
@@mnschoen No when YOU enter a dog park and take ur dog off the leash n let em out of ur control u except the consequences... That's posted at all the dog parks I've ever been to... Like when u play football u can't turn around and sue later when u get hurt... U were playing too...
Dog parks are the dumb anyway of course a bunch of random dogs off a leash are going to end up fighting eventually and the owners are always like 😯
And ya I watched the case n heard the ruling but the judge is wrong because watch this... What did the bigger dog owner do that was "negligent" exactly?... Have his dog off the leash?
As u probably so eloquently put it... All the dogs are off the leash ya?
My Most favorite and most Intelligent Judge of All on TV ❗❗❗
She lied.. She couldn’t have seen the other dog bite hers.. she said she saw her dog get growled at, run away and then get chased by his dog. But the next words are “out of the corner of my eye”.. so what was it? Did she see it happen and then stop looking? Or did she never see it and only saw the dog approach “out of the corner of her eye” after the (assumed) attack?
ENOUGH of the dog-attack ones already!
THANK YOU! I'm sick of this show and GLAD they took it off the air already!
I'm kinda late here but I took my little dog to a park once, never again! All the bigger dogs zoned in on him, scary as heck, I was out of there.
Dangers of dog park and the strep infection probably came from the vet
The plaintiff has the cutest pbull mix I have seen so far
It makes total sense the plaintiff got what she got, defendant wasn’t responsible for the broken toe.
So the guy basically paid 2400 dollars for a dog bite? Are you serious ? GTFO
Nah. Plaintiff greedily Refused the 1k he personally sent after first bill so she could sue for more.
I would never ever take my dog to a dog park. I think dog parks are a stupid idea
It is the dog is the dog owners who have never trained their dogs are the stupid idea.
@trekgirl65 lol I've heard of people that have trained dogs that go to dig parks and still get into dog fights . Unless ur Caesar Milan you have no business taking ur dog to a dog park 😅
You're wrong. Since 2005 after he socializes a dog Cesar Millian takes clients with their dog to the dog parks. He advises them that the first time you take them see how many dogs are in there and if they all have a calm energy then you can bring your dog in. If the energy is too hyper and you see scuffles going on then stay out. In those cases you can keep your dog outside the park and walk it around the perimeter. The dogs in the park are very curious about the new dog outside the fence and will come to it. Now walk your dog to meet them and correct your dog (leash pull) if he charges at the fence. Keep doing that until your dog doesn't charge. He learns to walk slowly to the fence, head low (submission) to meet and sniff his new friends at the fence. Eventually the day will come for you to bring the dog in. Use common sense.
@MusicTennis lol I was being sarcastic. You didn't need to write a whole paragraph
😃 1.) I didn't .. I copy and paste 2.) you said "unless you're Cesar Millan".... you're saying people can't bring dogs to the park instead of offering a solution like I am to watch his show.@@Bebedollie
Good call judge.
I find it very troubling that he tried to get her to call the dog warden to retract her statement in return for him paying the vet bill. I believe that's extortion
As another commenter said: "Sounds like he was trying to do the right thing and she was the difficult one." It was an accident and he took responsibility. If anything, she tried to extort him, by demanding a huge & changing amount of money...and I suppose calling the "dog warden" in the first place.
@@private464wrong, troll
I’m surprised the Judge ignored that comment
@@private464Agree. Sounds like an accident and the laceration didn’t look like a bite. It did look like a snagged tooth that tore because they were running. I think she reported his dog to try to get him to pay
@@oldageisdumb Exactly. She tried to get his dog labeled as a vicious dog that would have to be muzzled at all times by law. That is so unreasonable when there was no viciousness involved. No growling, barking, or fighting. Just running & playing and then a yelp.
Milking him for all he's worth!
i would not have given her a cent unless she retracted her fraudulent complaint to animal control. and i would hold her 50% responsible.
Did you not see the pictures of the wounds the victim dog received from the attack dog, very serious with a drainage tube. Can't make that up.
What happened first the complaint or the incident?
@@trekgirl65Actually, the pictures make it pretty clear that it wasn’t an attack. That does not at all look like a dog bite. It looks like they were running, collided, and the shepherd’s tooth snagged the thinner skin of the other dog and tore it. She reported to guy’s dog to try to bully him into paying her the money
This woman sounds like she can be very vengeful.
How’d you get to that conclusion?
You sound misogynistic.
WHAT? Dogs that play with each other are mutually responsible.
7:52…. See some women agree that big things comes in little packages… lol
Dog parks you can’t sue. Unless prior knowledge of aggression towards other dogs, they are in an off leash, at your own risk situation.
I didn't realize that German Shepherds got a bad wrap. That's interesting! But then, I'm one that isn't bothered by any dogs. Yes! You heard me right! I do not fear even dogs that growl at me. Go ahead and call me stupid. I don't care.
😊 You are an animal lover!!🥰
@@labradoriteatheartActually, in this case you are incorrect. OP was trying to say “a bad rap”, which is a correct use of the term, but spelled rap wrong
German Sheps and Belgian Malnois protect the public from horrible criminals by assisting law enforcement and by finding surviviors buried in earthquakes.
debra .. i rehab dogs to stop aggression. If someones dog is growling/barking at you please do NOT give them eye contact or speak to them. Slowly turn around and be calm. They will stop it!😃
Her comparing him talking about the damage of a german shepard and demostic violence are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS. When she does dog cases, it shows how uneducated she is.
I always thought that if u took your dog to a dog park you assume the risk of what happens because they are all off leash
I don't understand why would anyone agree to appear on this show when dogs are involved. She has a huge bias when it comes to dogs.
I just accidentally watched something called Watcha Eatin about a pitbull eating a puppy and she was laughing and yelling at the puppy owner. She must be guilty of something like that herself. What a pile of trash.
Judge in most cases: we don't judge the dog, we judge the owner.
Judge in this case: let's judge the dog reacting to another dog, both off leash.
Ya basic, JM.
I would not take my dog back to the park after all those injuries. Seems odd.
And this is the main reason I don’t go to dog parks. Anything can happen in a split second.
Wait what state is this? Ive seen the judge rule against plaintiff saying dog parks are free for all unless the defendants dog has bitten others before.
That soft cone was too big, they have smaller ones at the pet supply stores.
They also sell bodysuit onesies on Amazon, so they don’t need to wear the cone.
Judge’s hair on point!
Thanks to the people's cour I learn something new in every show
She's a mother of 3?😂😂
The plaintiffs thank you smile was a bit psychotic
OK BECKY WAS REACHING W/ THE BROKEN TOE & SPEAKER LIKE REALLY BUT HAPPY THAT SHE HAD ALL THE MEDICAL RECORDS 1ST PERSON YET THAT I'VE SEEN. THE DEFENDANT SEEMS LIKE A ASSSS VERY DISMISSIVE GLAD SHE WON
So over the dog attack episodes!
No, we need to see them so I can pass on info about how to prevent attacks. See my long comment to AntinealAnita below.😀
I believe the defendant i owned a GSD and they will do more than one little cut when they bite sounds like an accident they collided dog went rolling and git cut. If the GSD was bitten why didn’t they bring up about rabies and shots for the GSD
I would never take my dog to a dog park it's trouble waiting to happen and a lot of parks hold the owners responsibility for their own dogs injuries
The guy that said 9 out of 10 times it's the small dogs that are aggressive obviously never watches people's court 😂
He's right though, most times it's the little dog running up and barking and antagonizing, that starts the problems.
Love how the judge didnt even acknowledge that he tried to pay her. I get that the state law makes him liable 100%, but morally shes at least 50% liable since they both decided to let the dogs loose, besides he tried to make good on it to some extent and she refused. She was out to get as much as possible. Silly.
Seems like the dog was injured more at home than the park!
I love MM’s laugh. It’s great.
I would never take my dog to a dog park
I'm glad the plaintiff got the judgement for the bite but not for the broken toe which was her fault. It's hard to know exactly what happened but two dogs that are socialized properly will not use their mouth. It's possible the Shep is dominant and tried to side mount the Visla. They both need lessons online about dog park tips, socializing, etc.
this tantrum throwing fake judge fits the profile of someone who has let her own dogs hurt people. She's setting a precedent that pitbulls and other dangerous dogs don't need to be under anyone's control if they're in a fenced area. She's probably got a yard full of them, just waiting for some dumb kid to lose his frisbee...
Agreed
C'mon folks! Don't take your dogs to a dog park! They are just a dog fight waiting to happen. It doesn't matter how well your dog is socialized. Dogs are dogs. I've had dogs all my life (German Shepherds too, mostly). I would never ever take my very much loved babies to a place where they could be hurt.
You shoulda taken to the vet immediately
Judge looks nice here. The lip the pop of colour from the shirt and the nails are all beautiful and working together beautifully
I like this style on her very much. I have only seen a few episodes where her stylist did her no favors. She is so like CLASSY
That cone is softer. My dog did ok with it
The plaintiff is a karen, just cause u smile in the camera doesn't make u sweet...con artist
And after all that...theyre right back to the dog park. Smart.
So many years ago owning dogs was really fun and they took care of themselves never had these types of problems in our generations NOW PEOPLE ARE JUST WAY TOO SERIOUS and CONTROLLING WITH PETS
Hang on...judge usually thinks "dogs are not people, that's why we punish the people and not the dog" but in this case she directly compares the damage a dog can do to a domestic abuser excusing his own behavior? I...WHAT?
As the judge as has previously noted...people are not dogs. Dogs are dogs and do dog behavior. This dog's behavior was a snap to tell the little dog to f*ck off. I believe him. If a German Shepherd attacked, that woman's dog would be mincemeat.
On the other hand: yup, sorry. You go to a dog park and let your dog loose, all bets are off. That little nip will cost you.
Who would take a dog to a dog park. Not because of the dog but the owners. Kooks
I walk dogs and I will go around parks if people aren’t following the leash law because I was forewarned the dog I walk doesn’t like dogs I don’t go walking in and say eh if they bite it will be their fault they’re off leash .
Did I understand correctly that some of your clients ask you to walk their dogs that are unsocialized? They are depriving their dog of the joy/exhilaration of doggie friends. Those clients should watch Cesar Milan The Dog Whisperer or other free shows to fulfill their responsibilty to their dog.😀
The Plaintiff got a bit to greedy with her case. I myself don't believe it was a viscous attack. This happens all the time at Dog Parks and owners play apart of safety issues with their dogs KNOWING dogs are running wild w/out leashes..I think dog parks are gross and breeding ground for parasites
We had bird dogs (Gordon setters). They’re very thin and fast-not meant for rough play with other dogs.
Why wasnt the un-leashing aspect brought up
This lady drags out every detail. Just answer the questions, yes/no then facts. She is telling a novel.
So the dog leans against furniture and a speaker fell on the foot?
Why I have 4 dogs and I keep them at home so if something happens I know who is responsible! Just like parents with children , The parent ( owner of the dog) are the issue not the dogs themselves!!
Leashes leashes leashes be a responsible pet owner 😔