Fun fact: Neville's left handed. So when he had to grab the broomstick with the RIGHT HAND, as madam Hooch said, he couldn't control it. Simple and logical, isn't it?
@@elijahstubel5288 yeah i know. But somehow in the order of the Phoenix when he is in Umbrigdes office for hus detencion the words cut in his right hand, and hes writung with the other hand. Was that good english? I hope so... im german sry😂
Another Harry Potter I heard is why Snape have such a hard time to Neville. Snape did this because if Neville was made the chosen one (because of the prophecy), Lily wouldn't have died
But to me this make no sense and how JK even think of this That's why I love movies's Snape In movies they modified the character and now he is one of the most loved character
@@Nimbus-et4rd doesn't matter.... The prophecy was anyway that a boy born in the end of July would kill him. So Neville could very well have been that boy.
The cannibalism theory is unlikely, because harry was an accidental horcrux... You can't accidentally eat someone Edit:I saw a lot of comments that talked about harry not being eaten. That's not the point. Harry is the vessel, you don't eat the vessel. You would eat the person you killed to create the horcrux. And when snape arrives at the potters house both parents are found, hence the cannibalism theory is false
Not only that, but Snape found the Potters after Voldemort had murdered them. Harry's parents' bodies were both witnessed and untouched, other than the killing curse done to them. The cannibalism theory doesn't fit at all with Harry being an unintentional horcrux.
Lockhart was there to show Harry what he might become if he let his fame go to his head. It was a lesson dumbledore wanted to teach all the students ...
I have a theory on why Snape bullied Neville the most, even more than Harry The prophecy could have been about Neville instead of Harry which means Voldemort could have killed Neville's parents instead, meaning Lily would have still been alive. Therefore resulting in Snape despising Neville even more than Harry.
Fun fact: in the books neville states that his grandmother "made him use his fathers wand" he didnt choose to thats why he was so bad at magic and when he got a new one he was better he even says he thanks harry for breaking his wand bcz then his grandmother "had to buy him a new one" 😊
@@Astran.21 he didn't eat harry because if harry is an accidental horcrux then he woulden't have to eat him, but the person who he killed. in that case it's lily.
The book that doesn't exist? Please, that's weirdass fanfic. J.K. forgot every character (especially Harry), every wizarding rule, and pretty much everything that happened in books 1-7.
You Don't Need To Know Who I Am Because she didn’t write it. Her name is only there for marketing reasons. At this point, they only milk HP Universe for more and more money and it ruins everything.
The one issue with that is according to Rowling, "The Cursed Child" is Canon Honestly, I didn't mind the musical stage play. Do I think it was perfect? No. But I will say that I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. It was interesting to say the least.
@@ChristopherRivers277 i want lost chapters, in germany we have the best audio book in the world, because the maan you reads it is really more acting than reading, but he is one man show but does such a brilliant job that you dont need pictures too see and hear it like a movie for the ears,
Dumbledore: Students safety is my top priority. Repeatedly hires dangerous professors -1 year later- GUYS ITS. A JOKE Ik that he was tricked a lot it’s just a joke
@@iamking419 when you get a notification about a comment and click on it, the comment highlights so you know which comment/reply you're looking for. Nothing special sorry to burst your bubble
I Don’t think the one with the horcruxes is real. Here’s Why: Harry was a horcrux, because Voldemort killed Lily And the power got to the first living object it could find: Harry. But Voldemort never consumed Lily’s flesh. Because after Voldemort killed lily we see Snape hugging her. It can’t be logical that after that Voldemort came in And was like. “I’m gonna eat you now so Harry is a horcrux.” Because Voldemort didn’t even know that he was one. So then the theory Falls apart :(
Iris van Gils what do you mean Voldemort wasn’t lookin to make a horcrux it’s possible Harry’s ability to see into Voldemort is because he didn’t eat Harry’s flesh
Iris van Gils maybe the second part of it is you have to see the people you kill as less then human. Meaning you have no respect for humanity so yours crumbles away.
@xxPussyxxSl4yrxx I don't think so. Voldemort uses the murder of his muggle father to turn his uncle's ring into a horcrux. but when he askes slughorn how to create one, he has already killed his father. So if what you say is true, on this point the part of his soul he split from the rest with murdering tom riddle senior should have bound itself to something random long ago. Second point: if your theory was right, each and every murderer in the harry potter universe would be immortal, even if most of them had no idea what their horcrux is.
So, Hogwarts happened inside Harry's head, right? 'Of course it's happening inside your head Harry, but why on earth should that mean it isn't real?' - Albus Dumbledore (Deathly Hallows, Chapter-35) Dumbledore has said it😁
The unlucky 13 prophecy also shows up in Deathly Hallows. If I remember this right, when everyone was mourning Mad Eye Moody, there's 13 people at the table. Remus is the first to rise. And he's the first to die during the Final Battle at Hogwarts.
Can't be any darker than a child being conditioned from birth to fight a genocidal maniac because of the traumatic experiences of every adult in his life.
I’m gonna have to disagree on Snape appearing when Harry used the resurrection stone. The people who appeared were people who were important TO HARRY not to just the plot. His parents he missed and always longed for, Sirius who was the closet thing he had to a parental figure who also had a connection to his dad, and Remus who was also a strong connection to his parents. While Snape was very much involved at one point with his parents and was actually on his side, he was still a pretty rotten person/professor to him.
Foxstream I disagree. He named one of his offsprings after Snape, so of course Snape was important to Harry. However I think it would’ve been cruel of J.K. Rowling to keep Snape alive. He was miserable and utterly heartbroken. His agony needed to end.
I find personal solace in this particular theory; Snape's story has always been so tragic to me and I think he's extremely underrated. However, I agree with you in thinking that Snape would not have appeared with the resurrection stone...in addition to what you said, Dumbledore didn't show up either, and Dumbledore was the closest thing to a father figure Harry had (Sirius was more of a brotherly/uncle-like figure).
At this point though did he even know that snape was good? I actually am asking this as a genuine question because I don’t remember the timeline exactly. When he uses the stone is this before or after he realizes snapes real motives? Because if before, that would easily explain why snape was not included
Imagine if the last sentence of the last Harry Potter book was: And then Harry woke up, in his cupboard, under the stairs. Edit: OMG SO MANY LIKES Edit 2: I’m sorry, but 1K!? This is literally the most I have ever gotten °0°
the last one is not true because if harry was a dursley, then why was he mistreated? he would have been spoiled like dudley- the only reason that he was mistreated was because of his parent's magical background
Maybe his parents were killed in a car crash and everything was real except for the magical bits? Then he wouldn't bee Dursley. Then maybe petunia and Lily had a bad relationship
It could be true because a narcissistic parent (or parents in the case of the Dursleys) quite often have a golden child and a scapegoat. (Dudley is the golden child and Harry is the scapegoat) The golden child is given everything they want, praised etc. The scapegoat is constantly blamed for everything that goes wrong and given hardly anything. Look it up it makes a lot of sense.
After re-reading the title of the video I realised that they indeed must have run out of ideas. How about 10 fan theories that might be true.. Harry wasn't dreaming it though. I don't know about you but I don't generally dream up people like Umbridge.
Lost me at the first one. The whole having an snake venom antidote on his person bc he's a potions master. As if Arthur Weasley didn't have to be in hospital for several days after venom poisioning from the SAME SNAKE.
Agreed. It also seems random that he would would just carry anti-venom potion on him JUST because he was a potions master.. There are a LOT of potions.
well,he knew the existence of Nagini.He probably knew what kind of snake venom antidote was needed.He also probably carried it around cause you know,the fear of being killed by Nagini.
About the creation a horxue, there's one small hole, in this theory. If eating small part of the person, which Voldy killed, would made new horcrux, how can Harry be then one of them?
"Horcruxes were hinted at as far back as the Goblet of Fire" but, but the second book was literally based around a horcrux. Tom says "a piece of my soul in is this book". Dude you stuffed up
Thunderpony Wuiske but JKR came up whit the horcrux’s in the end of the series. Bc she knew she had to com up whit someting that made Harry surviev and Kill Voldemort whitout makeing Harry the real killer or someting like that.
Yeah, and the entire theory was disproved by the fact that Tom Riddle's (Voldemort's) dad, who he killed to create a horcrux, had a body in "perfect condition" so there was no sign that he could have possibly been eaten.
A Cute Berry But the Harry case was different, he had no intention of making him a horcrux. The killing curse ricocheted back to him, in his dying state he latched on to the nearest living being: Harry himself.
Queen Creepycandy hurm but still tho. it doesn't mean you have/need to eat their bodies as well if you want to eat their soul. i have read all books of harry n watch the movies but i didn't recall that? im open to change opinion however, if it's indeed told otherwise in books/movies/jk rowling.
There is one, GIGANTIC, hole in the final theory. Harry returned to the Dursley's every year, including just after Sirius and Dumbledore had both died.
Yeah there’s this one also if Hogwarts isn’t real and it is just a mental hospital so does that mean Harry’s parents are alive and the whole story would be different. You see the reason why I thought that is because one Voldemort happen to have studied in Hogwarts which made him have more knowledge of magic. Two if Voldemort is knowledgeable of magic that can kill, he can kill anyone he wants. He happened to have killed lili and james potter with the magic he learned from hogwarts. Three then Harry won’t be alive because Lily and James seemed to have met each other at Hogwarts and fell for each other there.
Ok if he is alive so how they are gonna show us in their next movie like who will be the new severus cuz Alan has died so actor is gonna change right..?
"The oldest brother, in procession of the elder wand, is the oldest brother in a dissent of the first brother." WHAT?! I don't think you're speaking English. Who the hell is the older brother supposedly representing?
Finally! I was scrolling through comments thinking surely someone else had noticed this first sentence making absolutely no sense and the made up word of "prossession."
Here's something to think about: We all know that the reason Dumbledore didn't want to give Snape the DADA post in Hogwarts was because he didn't want him to get too attached with the dark arts so he'd return to Voldemort's side. But there could be another reason... We know that Snape wanted the defence against the dark arts job from the start all along, but Dumbledore never gave him the job until book 6. People good at spotting patterns will also realise that the post is jinxed; no one can keep the post for more than a year. Snape was a crucial part of Dumbledore's plan to kill Voldemort, so he didn't want him to be faced with something bad as a result of having the DADA post, until the sixth book when Snape had done the unbreakable vow to kill Dumbledore, so he knew this was the time to let him have the post. Think about that, huh
@@gohondieli9232 Yes it was Dumbledore told Harry in the 6th book that not a single DADA teacher stayed more than a year since he refused the job to Voldemort.
I read a theory kind of similar to the last one where Harry had actually just dreamt all of it and at the end of the story he just wakes up right back at the cupboard under the stairs. His parents had in fact died in a car accident, he had no magical abilities at all, Ron and Hermione were just kids who lived in the neighbourhood and everyone else were just random people he had met but pretty much everything was just his imagination. He had created all of this in his head just as an escape from how his home life was.
Snape never would have shown up when Harry used the Resurrection Stone because he was nothing to Harry, regardless of his actions to keep Harry safe. Lupin was a father figure to Harry. He was his friend, and Harry was the godfather to Teddy, Lupin's son. There is absolutely no reason that Lupin wouldn't have shown up. Just because the movie doesn't elaborate on Harry and Lupin's relationship doesn't mean it wasn't deeper in the books. Also, the theory about George Weasley really hurts my heart.
If Snape meant nothing to Harry why would he name his son after him, and speak of him so highly at the end of the 7th book. I think he realized in that moment he saw the memory of Snape that he was the guy that was the bravest and done much for him, and he totally should've been there.
If I recall correctly, Harry saw Snape's memories AFTER ressurrection hence he acknowledged what Snape was doing all that time and finally regarded him so highly. Then he named his son after him.
I'm sorry but I don't agree with you on the fact that Snape was nothing to Harry, in The Cursed Child Harry names his son after Snape and says he is the bravest man he ever knew
Which Still She could of make and pissed a Lot of people and Maybe even have suicide but that 8 and 9 book to save Harry from the dursley and give him a normal loving family Luna and Her family which it would of been weird since they are crazy in the book but really smart in real life and they love Harry as one of their kids but he basically falls for Luna like falls for her clumsiness but that would of been crazy anyways let's be glad it was all real
I think Lockhart was hired because most people thought it was a cursed job and so very few people wanted to take it which led to him volunteering himself.
Ni' kerk that WOULD be cursing it. And it was revealed by JK that when Voldemort died the curse on the position was lifted. Powerful spells and curses are usually lifted once the wizard who originally cast them die.
prolly the other way around tbh like I can imagine a squib becoming so frustrated for not having magical abilities that s/he may break away from the wizarding world and live w/o any mention of magic. Over time as the generations pass they would eventually become muggles.
@@nishaa42 he had just realised that Dumbledore had legit protected him to be killed by Voldemort. I dont think he'd want to see his face. Especially now that he was about to die.
@@ajinkyabandiwdekar6495 well dumbledore knew he wouldn't die because of his mother's blood in voldemort's body. Dumbledore himself explained this in the station sequence . I am sure dumbeldore knew that before he died
@@nishaa42 not entirely sure about that. He did say he had a hunch. But this is supposed to be such an old form of magic that even he couldn’t 100% predict it so accurately. So. Yea. Maybe you’re right. But. It could have gone either way.
@@nishaa42 this was just before the station sequence so he could just be angry at Dumbledore's intention, also simply, the marauders and Lily were more important to him
It would make sense that Snape, being a potion master AND a double agent, would carry many anti-venom types due to the high risk of his assassination by either side.
Juliett 1313 my man had his neck slashed and was in a meeting with his boss. How exactly was he a) supposed to see that coming or b) gonna fix a slashed neck with antivenom
Well, we have heard the rule, never let anybody else see you when you go back in time. He couldn't have saved his brother without driving the whole battle into even further insanity. And even if none of them would be freaked out by George, there would still be a chance for him too to die in the battle if he went back to save his brother, and he might cause even more people to die. It's why in Cursed Child, Draco never went back in time after his wife died. He loved her and wanted to honour her memory more then to cause chaos and disrupt the future. I think George would have come to the same conclusion if he had a time turner. He loved Fred too much, but the people around him too, so he couldn't. If we were to speak that this theory is canon, which obviously is not.
Yeah you can’t really save someone tho cuz if you went back and saved them then there would be no reason to go back and save him thus bringing the world to an end full of paradoxes 🤯
+Richard Bellars I know, right! That's always made me wonder why Hermione got to use her timeturner to turn back time so she could be in class, but everyone in that class saw her. Also, when Harry and Hermione went to save Buckbeak, there you go again! Buckbeak AND Dumbledore saw them both, but nothing happened other than Buckbeak being saved. And another thing! I think it was Dumbledore that said this, but it was a part in the book of POA that no spell can reawaken the dead, yet a timeturner can save Buckbeak?! It confused me when I was first reading it, and it still confuses me today. Would someone kindly explain to me what the reason of all of this is for and please let it be accurate as possible?
Well, I think performing a spell to bring back the dead vs. going back in time to change an event from occurring, are two different things. As for Hermonine being able to use the time turner to be in class, she says herself that McGonagall gives it to her so she can take double the work load that year. So she would see two differ groups of students during a class hour not the same one (if that makes sense). For example, if she had potions and charms at the same time, she would sit thru potions then use the time turner after to go back and do charms which would be a differ set of students. It's hard to explain but makes sense in my head lol.
@Powerfulrainbow Cat Yep, lots of people describe mental health facilities as 'like a prison'. It's calling it a hospital within the theory of insanity. He SEES it as a prison but it is in fact (within the theory) a high security hospital.
Remco Sloove yeah it doesn't make sense, they do comparable things, but reincarnation? I thought the only way to return was as a ghost, and they say it as if being the reincarnation of Arthur made Harry's parents die, because it had to be the same or something, it's weird!!
I totally agree, plus pulling the sword from the hat was based off of it but doesn't mean that it is exactly it. Neville also pulled it out of the hat. Just because his ancestors did something doesn't mean that you do the exact same thing. If you look up the Potters family tree there is no mention whatsoever as Arthur. Also surely that would make Harry a living relative of a king and wouldn't everyone have told him that. He should be ruling England.
I thought the whole of them pulling the sword out of the Hat was that they may have a relation to godric Gryffindor. After all the hex that's on it only one minute shows true Spirit of the house or whatever symbol of the sword in the Hat. And with the whole Voldemort being related the Slytherin being little parallel between the two/three.
According to Pottermore, if Nevilles first wand was made of ash wood and had a core of unicorn hair it is very likely that was just to much attached to its first owner to be of any great use for him. The same is true about Rons first wand, which he got from his older brother. In both cases it would explain, why both, Ron an Neville, got way more powerfull after they finally got wands suited to them.
Notice also that in OotP, when Neville gets serious about the DA, that's when he starts to improve drastically. It's also the book where we really see the Longbottoms. Perhaps his father's wand would have worked well for him from then on, but when he started taking his education of DADA seriously, he was following in his father's footsteps. Taking a stand against the dark arts and actively learning spells and tactics to that end could have proven to his father's wand he was worthy of its loyalty. As wands in this universe are seemingly sentient to some degree, him showing the wand he's serious about its original owner's path and goals could have been the spark for wand and wizard to finally click. Perhaps even a way to.win its allegiance, as it's shown killing the previous owner isn't the only way to do so. Even before getting a wand truly suited to him, still using his father's, he was part of a small group that went toe to toe with death eaters and the entire group hs went to the Ministry with survived. His progression through the book shows that the wand and he had bonded over the course of DA training. And then, in DH, he essentially led most of Hogwarts's students against the Dark Lord himself and proved his true spirit of bravery, after enduring torture for the better part of the year. It becomes increasingly clear he is a powerful wizard, but justa took awhile to bloom, and the uncooperative wand didn't help
+Slyfox cub I think there's this thing about unicorn hair cores sometimes dying when their owner dies? If the wand could have "known" something, then probably through that. Although it begs the question if a wand can recognize when it's owner's mind has been destroyed. Do they just react to the magic or to the whole person?
@Ella Wright You have to remember that someone who is sitting opposite you has their left on your right. They are facing the opposite direction, so their left looks like it's on the right for you. Even otherwise, George and Willy Wonka point to different eats from each other.
@@luminoustorus548 i did have to pull up a clip 😂 i had forgotten all about this but he is gesturing to his deaf ear in the movie. I still love the theory, i just thought it was funny that they chose to use that clip
The first theory has massive holes. For starters, Snape never cared for Harry, nor did he die for Harry. Everything he did was for Lily. There would be no reason for Snape to show up in the resurrection stone since all of those who did show up had an intimate connection with Harry that was predicated on love. Snape didn't love Harry or even like Harry. Snape was my favorite character and so I would love for him to still be alive, but that theory is just not practical.
The Piper Report or The Logical answer besides that is that even still dying. Can't resurrect somebody that's still alive. Even if they're trying to say he was like a bitchy uncle.
Care definition: "the provision of what is necessary for the health, welfare, maintenance, and protection of someone or something." He did care for Harry whether he did it for Lily or not is irrelevant to his actions of caring for him.
Divine Campe he gave a level of care, yes, in the concrete sense. He did not care for him in the emotional sense. Harry was too much a symbol of Snape's own errors, what could have been for him, and an endless reminder of the brutal bully who made most of his school experience a living nightmare. And had Harry not been born, Voldemort would not have gone out of his way to go after the Potters, Lily coould have still been alive, and even not with Snape, hope springs eternal. Harry represents the mistakes Snape made, from driving his best friend and unrrequited love of his life away, spying for Voldemort, and all his prideful failing between. In the end, Snape was a good man and brave as hell, even though he went through a time of being dark that few could ever redeem themselves from. He's a complex character and that's part of why the fanbase loves him. From a human standpoint he's a massive prick at best, and that never remedies, but he also fought the good fight and was a key.part of its success. It's not even jerk with a heart of gold status, he's a jerk to the core, but he had moral standards he developed from having been on both sides, and ended up drawing the line at true evil.
He admitted to Dumbeldore in book 7 that he didn't care for Harry even after all the years he spent protecting him. Everything Snape did was for Lily. I was upset that Snape died but JK did it right. She didn't have him sacrifice himself for Harry; she didn't have him jump in front of a spell for Harry, etc. His death was accurate in terms of his feelings for Harry. It would have been out of his character for him to die by sacrificing himself for someone he never cared for.
Dear Molly Weasley Thank you for taking care of my son. I hope he is well. Thank you for taking care of him all these years when I have not been able to. Thank you. I'm taking care of your son up here as you have done with mine. Fred is well and happy though he does miss you. Good bye Molly. -Love Lily Potter Edit: thanks for 100 likes
Aurthor weasey almost died from an attack by nagini. It’s more about the blood loss than venom. Not to sure snape was up to the mental strength it took to heal himself after bleeding like that. Plus he pretty much sacrificed himself to Voldemort so Harry could go on and do what he had to do.
He could by summoning iron man's gauntlets and use them to put the thing on his throat just like tony stark did when thanos put the knife through him or when hulk tried to use the infinity gauntlet
Here's my Theory. Nobody at Screen Rant has ever watched or read an interview with Jo Rowling. No matter how many times people correct them on the pronunciation of her name (It's Rowling as in Bowling, not Raoling as in Howling) they can never seem to get it right.
This is just my opinion, but I feel like Snape's final words should've been "you have beautiful eyes." Instead of "you have your mother's eyes." Everyone says that Harry has his mother's eyes, so hearing it from Snape didn't feel TOO special. It was good, but it didn't feel REALLY special. This new version acknowledges Snapes love for Lily, I think.
Sunny 卌: It was because Voldemort only heard the first half of the prophecy. According to Voldemort, both Harry's parents and Neville's were against him, but if Voldemort had gone to the Longbottoms instead of the Potters that fateful night, Neville would have been the chosen one. Oh yes and both Harry and Neville were born in the same month that was mentioned in the first half of the prophecy.
10:04 it makes no sense when you think about it. Voldemort would’ve had to eat Lily’s flesh to turn Harry into a horcrux but Harry was an accidental horcrux. It’s impossible to have an accidental horcrux with the Cannable theory
There's a lot wrong with what you're saying: 1. Who says they searched for bodies in the Shrieking Shack? There's absolutely no reason for anyone to go look there, it's far from the Hogwarts grounds, so no wonder they didn't find Snape (and even if they did, Harry didn't look at all the bodies). And Nagini's venom is pretty incurable, look at how much trouble the Healers had at healing Arthur in St. Mungo's!! 3. Dumbledore didn't posess the three Hallows at the same time, he found the Stone years after he'd given away the Cloak, and he never truthfully owned the Cloak, only Harry posessed the three of them at the same time. Just ask Dumbledore, in "King's Cross" he says that Harry is the true Master of Death!! 6. Who was the other Gryffindor girl besides Lavender and Parvati? Her name is definitely NEVER mentioned in the books, I'm 100% sure she doesn't exist!!! And we don't see the whole Sorting Ceremony in the books, we don't see Dean getting sorted (I've checked all the Gryffindors). 7. Ron's first wand was second hand too, and he too wasnt very good at the beginning. 8. Did Voldemort eat himself in order to make Harry a Horcrux? I believe his body was never found... (But then he would've known that Harry was a Horcrux). 9. Hagrid said Lockhart was the only candidate that year, mostly because Quirrell's death scared people off, and of course Dumbledore knew Lockhart was a fraud, Dumbledore is the smartest character of the whole series.
And Harry being the reincarnation of King Arthur doesn't make sense either. They do comparable things, but reincarnation? I thought the only way to return was as a ghost, and they say it as if being the reincarnation made all the comparable thins happen, so his parents die, because it had to be the same as with Arthur's parents or something, it's weird! And besides, WEASLEY IS OUR KING!!!
6. We certainly *don't* see the whole Sorting Ceremony in the books. Crabbe and Goyle are only mentioned during it as Malfoy 'went to join his friends ... looking pleased with himself' after being Sorted into Slitherin. And they *are* first years at that point.
I agree with you that most of these theories have holes in them, but with No. 8, its different. The reason Harry became a horcrux is not because Voldy did his ritual, but rather by accident. Harry became a horcrux because when Voldemort's spell backfired and hit Voldemort, his soul was already very very fragile, because thats what five horcruxes do to a soul. Therefore, when Voldemort was hit by his killing curse, his soul basically left his body and latched onto the only living thing around at the time: Harry, thus making Harry an accidental horcrux.
Umm... Except the books actually address the reason why Lockhart was hired... Hagrid tells Harry that he was the only available option and that Dumbledore knew he was a fake. Also, just because there are parallels in two people's lives doesn't make them related..
xKerensax +lilys body was in the house when snape came (after voldemort left) and cried over it but harry is still a horcrux = u dont need to eat the persons flesh
It's BS of the purest ray supreme, since both are WORKS OF FICTION, and by different authors, separated by several decades. It's always surprised me that so many adults keep thinking of movies and novels as real, instead of entertainment for kids. It's FICTION, people!
Oldenweery what difference does it being fiction make to the fan theory? If people thought George Weasley was Ed Sheeran or something that would be dumb, but why can't two bits of fiction be linked?
Oldenweery nobody said they were real. They don’t have to be real for them to be connected anyway. There’s plenty of games that are connected and all those are fake. Them being separated by decades doesn’t really matter either, as the newer of the films could easily just find a way to write it in. I must say that I don’t think they’re connected at all either, I just don’t agree with your reasoning
Snape wasn't a good guy. He wasn't a bad guy either, but he was definitely not a good guy. 1. He bullied many students , without any good reason to and let it affect his teaching, which was unacceptable 2. He tried to send to inocent men to azkaban , because of a school boy grudge. 3. He judged people due to their blood status. He did many good things and was very brave but he was still a bully and a liar who was willing to hurt inocent people. So he was definitely a very mixed character
Its almost like illegal content is flipped backwards to avoid copyright scanners... Just watch when you're watching these types of vids you'll see backwards words in the background and US cars driving on the left.. stuff like that
@Moxxuren would be an interesting idea, EXCEPT you can easily find that scene and unfortunately it isn’t backwards. He does indeed point to his right ear in the said scene they show. Sooooo yeah, Wonka is “hard of hearing” in his right ear not left. Theory debunked.
Random fact, horrocroxes split your soul in half, so Harry had more of Voldemort's soul than Voldemort. The ring had 50% diary 25% locket12.5% Ravenclaw's diadem 6.25% Hufflepuff cup 3.125% Harry then 1.5625% Nagini. That leaves 1.5625% of his soul left in himself. I am not sure whether the cup or the diadem came first, I think it is the diadem, but I can't be certain.
Chasam P The Diadem came first, he heard about it during school years and straight after school (after asking to be assigned as DADA teacher to Prof. Dippet, of course) he went to find it and claim it as a horcrux.
They only showed 10 students getting sorted bc you only really need to know the important characters. In the book they skip from like T to Z bc Harry is admiring the castle and things and it is describing that. They're are obviously more people bc in the 3rd movie the guy who knows what the Grimm is is from Gryffindor. So that's one more Gryffindor in the same year, plus who knows how many more?
The "only 10 students" and / or reduced intake of students thing would kinda explain why so many rooms were empty and could be used for hiding a mirror, flying keys, killer plants, stupidly large moving chess board and a giant three headed dog called Fluffy!
Snape wasn't in the Great Hall because he wasn't killed in the castle or on the grounds. He was killed in the Shrieking Shack, and no one's supposed to know he was there, so no one would've known to collect him.
Gideon Debateau in the books he died in the Shrieking Shack, and even if they knew his location that's far away and hard to get there because of the Whomping Willow and the blocked tunnel.
He died in the boat house in the movies, and the very title of this video is that it deals with the movie theories of Harry Potter... You have read the title, right?
Making of Horcrux It is said that when Lily was killed by Tom, Harry became his Horcrux, Voldemort was not even aware that Harry is his Horcrux... He never consumed Lily...
we know that killing rips the soul (its even stated by snape in the halfblood prince) but i think in order to get that piece of soul that got ripped and conceal it in an object to make a horcrux you need to do some act of evil before preforming the charm to make the actual horcrux. So i think on the night that voldemort killed James and lily his soul actually split into 3 (bcz he murdered james and lily and then there is his own soul) and when he tried to kill harry the spell backfired killing one part of his soul, and one part attached itself to the only living thing it found which was harry, and the last part of his soul fled as we know it said in the books he was ripped off his body less than a spirit less than a meanest ghost yet he was still alive
Here's my personal theory: Belle from Beauty and the Beast is actually Hermione from the future! Story: Hermione realized that something wasn't quite right about her favorite French history book entitled, "Beauty and the Beast". She reads even deeper into the story to find that before Belle could actually save the beast from his curse, so Hermione takes Belle's place, and realizes that the town is full of biggots who shame a girl for reading, so she does everything Beauty and the Beast to save the beast from his curse! Evidence: Her use of a time turner, her striking physical similarities to Belle, and her personality!
Actually the only person who has owned all of the deathly hallows. Dumbledore may have borrowed the cloak, but it wasn’t his. Neither was the wand. Harry had the cloak as an inheritance, the stone as a right of conquest, the wand from Draco who got it from Dumbledore.
Besides, Dumbledore never possessed all the Deathly Hallows at the same time. He gave the cloak back to Harry during the first year and found the stone before the sixth, when he didn't have the cloak anymore.
Also, in addition to everything already said to this, the cloak is, according to the tale, given - if I remember correctly - "from father to son, from mother to daughter". Meaning there's no way anyone outside Harry's lineage and possible side-lineages traceable to his lineage would ever be able to unite to Hallows. You'd have to be a direct descendant of Ignotus to inherit the cloak, without which uniting the Hallows is plain impossible.
Cannibalism is not how to make a horrcrux. We know that Tom riddles father was murdered for the creation of a horrcrux, But he was buried in the grave yard that we see in the fourth book. So, Voldemort could not have eaten his father.
Noah Robbins who said he had to eat the whole body 🙈 + in the GOF (movie)all that was at his fathers grave was 1 bone that we could see so who knows, JK said herself editors almost puked at the original way to make a haurcrux so it’s plausible
Also the one before that. It's sad in the book that nobody wants to teach that subject in Hogwarts since the position is "cursed". Nobody could remain there for a long time
More proof is that when harry was talking with Dumbledore , Dumbledore said "Of course this is all in your head but that doesn't mean that it's not real"
This channel is so awesome!
Thank you!
Igor Chesterfield ur is gay
Khettan, please learn proper spelling and grammar before interacting with people on the internet.
Igor Chesterfield ii
Chesterfield
????
Fun fact: Neville's left handed.
So when he had to grab the broomstick with the RIGHT HAND, as madam Hooch said, he couldn't control it. Simple and logical, isn't it?
Harry is too
Half-Blood _Princess Really? In the Philosophers stone he states that he’s right handed
@@elijahstubel5288 yeah i know. But somehow in the order of the Phoenix when he is in Umbrigdes office for hus detencion the words cut in his right hand, and hes writung with the other hand.
Was that good english? I hope so... im german sry😂
Half-Blood _Princess Your English was really good. I would just remember that it’s “i” and not “u” for his and writing.
True
Another Harry Potter I heard is why Snape have such a hard time to Neville. Snape did this because if Neville was made the chosen one (because of the prophecy), Lily wouldn't have died
But to me this make no sense and how JK even think of this
That's why I love movies's Snape
In movies they modified the character and now he is one of the most loved character
@Ruturaj Shiralkar Harry and Neville was not born on the same date. Neville was born July 30th, the day before Harry!
Snape bullied every single non-Slytherin. He bullied Neville more because he had more flaws than the others to pick on.
@@Nimbus-et4rd doesn't matter.... The prophecy was anyway that a boy born in the end of July would kill him. So Neville could very well have been that boy.
True
The cannibalism theory is unlikely, because harry was an accidental horcrux...
You can't accidentally eat someone
Edit:I saw a lot of comments that talked about harry not being eaten.
That's not the point.
Harry is the vessel, you don't eat the vessel. You would eat the person you killed to create the horcrux. And when snape arrives at the potters house both parents are found, hence the cannibalism theory is false
Very funny
banana cat thanks
JK Rowling wrote it but was forced to remove it, he probably already did the ritual but didn’t have a vessel, he ate the person not the vesse
Not only that, but Snape found the Potters after Voldemort had murdered them. Harry's parents' bodies were both witnessed and untouched, other than the killing curse done to them. The cannibalism theory doesn't fit at all with Harry being an unintentional horcrux.
Lor 450 exactly!!!
Yo, the George Weasley being Willy Wonka is crazy but it actually really fits if you think about it!
Yeah
Shame on you.
Except the charlie and the chocolate factory book discredits this....
It's certainly a fun theory and one I hadn't heard before! Time to read Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory books again! 😁
So this means George = Willy = Grimdelwald = Jonny lmao
Lockhart was there to show Harry what he might become if he let his fame go to his head. It was a lesson dumbledore wanted to teach all the students ...
This deserves more likes tbh
S. Q. I agree
it doesn't take a year to teach that lmao
Maybe Lucius put him in the job so the kids can’t learn anything and Ginny dies before nobody do anything
He also was the only applicant for the job
I have a theory on why Snape bullied Neville the most, even more than Harry
The prophecy could have been about Neville instead of Harry which means Voldemort could have killed Neville's parents instead, meaning Lily would have still been alive. Therefore resulting in Snape despising Neville even more than Harry.
@ruqaiya ahmed It does, in a twisted way.
I read this somewhere
TheColourfulCube maybe
@ruqaiya ahmed idk But I agree with this comment
Angela the book said it couldve been neville or harry
We will never see if he is alive :(
R.i.p alan he played this role perfectly (Most underrated actor on this planet)
Leon Hoffi I know. He was my favourite and will be ALWAYS
He is not the most underrated character to me in my opinion it seems that cho Chang and Cedric are
I finally realize snape was amazing 😭
💙💚🥰
The first Dumbledore died and got replaced
Fun fact: in the books neville states that his grandmother "made him use his fathers wand" he didnt choose to thats why he was so bad at magic and when he got a new one he was better he even says he thanks harry for breaking his wand bcz then his grandmother "had to buy him a new one" 😊
But didnt he get better during order of the phoenix before he brock it.
fun fact theres no way voldamort ate his victim's flesh otherwise harry wouldn't be a horcrux
@@Astran.21 not really
@@Astran.21 he didn't eat harry because if harry is an accidental horcrux then he woulden't have to eat him, but the person who he killed. in that case it's lily.
@@nezasiter498 but lily’s body was discovered
Hermione: you have the emotional range of a teaspoon!
Ron: your gonna marry that teaspoon.
Underrated😂
@Ruturaj Shiralkar what do u mean?
you're
@Ruturaj Shiralkar ._.
yes but it's you're
The "Neville's wand" theory also applies to Ron, having his brother's wand.
It's not his brother it's his DADS
Also Ron has his own wand
@@pigeon7054 Ron's wand broke in his second year when the car flew into the whomping willow
@@Astermints I kno
Ron's used Charlie's old wand and then got a new wand after year two was over.
“We all know that time turner’s still exist due to the Cursed Child play”
We do not speak it’s name
The book that doesn't exist?
Please, that's weirdass fanfic.
J.K. forgot every character (especially Harry), every wizarding rule, and pretty much everything that happened in books 1-7.
You Don't Need To Know Who I Am Because she didn’t write it. Her name is only there for marketing reasons. At this point, they only milk HP Universe for more and more money and it ruins everything.
@@youdontneedtoknowwhoiam6640 Here, I'll fix it:
"We all know that the Time Turners still exist, based on the musical 'A Very Potter Sequel.'"
The one issue with that is according to Rowling, "The Cursed Child" is Canon
Honestly, I didn't mind the musical stage play. Do I think it was perfect? No. But I will say that I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. It was interesting to say the least.
I kinda like the cursed child book. It’s Harry Potter.
Title: DARKEST Harry Potter theories that would SCARE VOLDEMORT :O
Video: Harry is King Arthur :)
Yeah ikr 😀
*George Weasley Is Willy Wonka*
Voldy: *gasp*
So scary!
10% of Harry Potter quotes: something touching and inspiring
90% of Harry Potter quotes: *YoU hAvE yOuR mOtHeRs EyEs*
"No one can have ever enough woolly socks"
"My father will hear about this" -Draco Malfoy
D O N T C A L L M E N Y M P H A D O R A
How to make Hermione a tsundare:”GeT oFf, RoN!”
🤣😂 soo true
You know what would scare Voldemort?
A nose
ayyy si true lol
yay im also in ravencalw
Lol
Christina Truong he would take the nose and examine it
No it's baldy basic
I alway thought it would be sneezing
voldemort should've made his nose a horcrux then nobody would find it
LMAO
😂
Underated
Why doesn’t this have more likes
What about a nockia
22 years later...
Ron: “And you just, left, without helping the rest of the fight?”
Snape: “I was in a coma, you ruddy twit!”
Ha ha
Ha Ha LOL
After tht
5 points from Griffindor
:-)happy
:-(sad
:)voldemort
Lol
My face right now 🤯
O
: )
O
He used that nose to make another horcrux
Lol
I want more Harry Potter films with the same characters I miss them so much
Books, I want more books
Oof, can you believe most of them are around 30...and Rupert is bouta have a kid(◎_◎;)
@@ChristopherRivers277 i want lost chapters, in germany we have the best audio book in the world, because the maan you reads it is really more acting than reading, but he is one man show but does such a brilliant job that you dont need pictures too see and hear it like a movie for the ears,
yess the cursed child and the fantastic beast movies are just not it
Dumbledore: Students safety is my top priority.
Repeatedly hires dangerous professors -1 year later- GUYS ITS. A JOKE Ik that he was tricked a lot it’s just a joke
Wait what does it mean if a comment is highlighted??
@@iamking419 when you get a notification about a comment and click on it, the comment highlights so you know which comment/reply you're looking for. Nothing special sorry to burst your bubble
Oh ok.. thanks tho
Hey Harry.... uuuh wanna go to dangerous situations putting your life at risk? No? No? Sure ya do Harry come on now.
Btw I love dumbledore
Dont insult dumbledore infront of me
the last one is actually terrifyinig to think about no mames.
qué exquisita combinación de idiomas xD
I Don’t think the one with the horcruxes is real. Here’s Why: Harry was a horcrux, because Voldemort killed Lily And the power got to the first living object it could find: Harry. But Voldemort never consumed Lily’s flesh. Because after Voldemort killed lily we see Snape hugging her. It can’t be logical that after that Voldemort came in And was like. “I’m gonna eat you now so Harry is a horcrux.” Because Voldemort didn’t even know that he was one. So then the theory Falls apart :(
None of this is real mate! Harry Potter series are a fiction, remember? Not a biopic!
Iris van Gils what do you mean Voldemort wasn’t lookin to make a horcrux it’s possible Harry’s ability to see into Voldemort is because he didn’t eat Harry’s flesh
Iris van Gils maybe the second part of it is you have to see the people you kill as less then human. Meaning you have no respect for humanity so yours crumbles away.
@xxPussyxxSl4yrxx
I don't think so. Voldemort uses the murder of his muggle father to turn his uncle's ring into a horcrux. but when he askes slughorn how to create one, he has already killed his father. So if what you say is true, on this point the part of his soul he split from the rest with murdering tom riddle senior should have bound itself to something random long ago.
Second point: if your theory was right, each and every murderer in the harry potter universe would be immortal, even if most of them had no idea what their horcrux is.
Also in goblet of fire the Riddles are said to be in perfect health appart from the fact they are dead
I love how Snape is hugging Lily's dead body while little Harry is literally screaming in his crib.
I don't know why I'm laughing reading this comment 😂😂
@Chels hahahahahahaha
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a dark satisfaction u have girl.
That last one destroys the potter verse
Yea 😥
what else can we expect from muggles afterall
So, Hogwarts happened inside Harry's head, right?
'Of course it's happening inside your head Harry, but why on earth should that mean it isn't real?'
- Albus Dumbledore
(Deathly Hallows, Chapter-35)
Dumbledore has said it😁
Dumbledore was referring to that version of King's Cross I believe.
If your gonna quote do it right
@@marthaoutlaw6995 Sorry.
genius
The unlucky 13 prophecy also shows up in Deathly Hallows. If I remember this right, when everyone was mourning Mad Eye Moody, there's 13 people at the table. Remus is the first to rise. And he's the first to die during the Final Battle at Hogwarts.
Same with Sirius.
Gasp. That is scary
🤭😳omfg
Wow I never thought of that well done :D
ShidesuHejjihoggu also in the fifth book Sirius gets up from a table of thirteen and is the first to do amongst them
Can't be any darker than a child being conditioned from birth to fight a genocidal maniac because of the traumatic experiences of every adult in his life.
Oooh. That hurt. But it is sadly the best summary of Harry Potter I've ever seen, oof
God damn that’s accurate
Screen Rant: George is Willy Wonka
Voldemort: **screams**
That cracks me up
The only wizard he ever feared...
You may laugh, but in my opinion Willy Wonka is pretty damn terrifying.
Darion Beats lol I actually love this theory
@@gohondieli9232 True dat
Also, 13 people sitting during Christmas in the black house. First person to stand up was....
Sirius Black.
Wie
Wow
R u some witch/wizard!!!?!??!?! I would never notice that...
@@UA-cams_NPC hehe
:O
Not sure how half of these are considered “dark”
Jazz Addiction the horcrux one is pretty dark
Matheus Laurentino now you named one theory out of 10 that is dark , well done
And the imaginary world theory...
If you consider Wonka is using an army of house elves.
Jazz Addiction the lockhart one was defiantly not...
What Voldemort passed to harry:
Parrseltounge
Powers
Horocrux
THE REST OF HIS NOSE (hopefully)
Possibly even his own mother's eyes. The beam DID go through her first.
I’m gonna have to disagree on Snape appearing when Harry used the resurrection stone. The people who appeared were people who were important TO HARRY not to just the plot. His parents he missed and always longed for, Sirius who was the closet thing he had to a parental figure who also had a connection to his dad, and Remus who was also a strong connection to his parents. While Snape was very much involved at one point with his parents and was actually on his side, he was still a pretty rotten person/professor to him.
Yes and no. I mean, he did actually named one of his sons Albus SEVERUS.
Foxstream I disagree. He named one of his offsprings after Snape, so of course Snape was important to Harry. However I think it would’ve been cruel of J.K. Rowling to keep Snape alive. He was miserable and utterly heartbroken. His agony needed to end.
I find personal solace in this particular theory; Snape's story has always been so tragic to me and I think he's extremely underrated. However, I agree with you in thinking that Snape would not have appeared with the resurrection stone...in addition to what you said, Dumbledore didn't show up either, and Dumbledore was the closest thing to a father figure Harry had (Sirius was more of a brotherly/uncle-like figure).
At this point though did he even know that snape was good? I actually am asking this as a genuine question because I don’t remember the timeline exactly. When he uses the stone is this before or after he realizes snapes real motives? Because if before, that would easily explain why snape was not included
@@stephaniekallish4442 I think he did, I watched the film again a couple days ago and I wondered why Snape didn’t appear
"the oldest brother in possession of the elder wand is the oldest brother in the descent of the first brother" did you have a stroke?!
I thought I was the only who misunderstood that. I had to replay that part multiple times because I wasn't sure if what I heard was right.
Sooooooo what did this mean?!? Because I’m still lost
A King it means that the oldest brother possesses the elder wand which is the older brother in the descent of the first brother.
But the oldest brother and the first brother are the same guy 😂
ROHIT SHARMA I’m legit gonna have a stroke now.
Imagine if the last sentence of the last Harry Potter book was:
And then Harry woke up, in his cupboard, under the stairs.
Edit: OMG SO MANY LIKES
Edit 2: I’m sorry, but 1K!? This is literally the most I have ever gotten °0°
I would be so pissed
OH my...
I actually would cry
Yooooo that would be soo cool
pacatuta waitshark I hadn’t thought about it like that!
Alan Rickman. Makes me cry everytime anyone talkes about him. Rip
Always...
Snape has always bin my favourite character R.I.P
Here is a funny theory: What if Voldemort used his nose to make a horcrux?
Haha thats would be funny😂Ron:Harry! destroy the nose!🤣
HES NOT DEAD YET!
😂😂😂😂
Voldemort: 🙁
He doesn't have one
After all 7 books:
And Dudley kicked harry's a** and harry woke up;yawning.
@Ruturaj Shiralkar 🤣🤣🤣LOL
The last theory was just riddikulus
Emre Kay A non potterhead reading *Harry Potter*
Lol I get it
goddang it
intentional misspelling
TRUE 😩
the last one is not true because if harry was a dursley, then why was he mistreated? he would have been spoiled like dudley- the only reason that he was mistreated was because of his parent's magical background
Maybe his parents were killed in a car crash and everything was real except for the magical bits? Then he wouldn't bee Dursley. Then maybe petunia and Lily had a bad relationship
It could be true because a narcissistic parent (or parents in the case of the Dursleys) quite often have a golden child and a scapegoat. (Dudley is the golden child and Harry is the scapegoat) The golden child is given everything they want, praised etc. The scapegoat is constantly blamed for everything that goes wrong and given hardly anything.
Look it up it makes a lot of sense.
Another reason he isn't dursley is because he and Dudley are 3 months apart and Harry would die if there was only a 3 month pregnancy
I read somewhere that when Lily & Petunia had a double date, James pranked Vernon or something...
Felix Tatang what does this have to do with the theory
I love Harry Potter
Epic Music Movie how was harry being king author dark
After re-reading the title of the video I realised that they indeed must have run out of ideas. How about 10 fan theories that might be true.. Harry wasn't dreaming it though. I don't know about you but I don't generally dream up people like Umbridge.
Me too
Same 'ere!
Epic Music Movie same
Lost me at the first one. The whole having an snake venom antidote on his person bc he's a potions master. As if Arthur Weasley didn't have to be in hospital for several days after venom poisioning from the SAME SNAKE.
True .
He wouldn't have gotten the antidote as quick as snape
Agreed. It also seems random that he would would just carry anti-venom potion on him JUST because he was a potions master.. There are a LOT of potions.
Well, if I recall it correctly, Nagini just split his throat. That's why he died.
well,he knew the existence of Nagini.He probably knew what kind of snake venom antidote was needed.He also probably carried it around cause you know,the fear of being killed by Nagini.
About the creation a horxue, there's one small hole, in this theory.
If eating small part of the person, which Voldy killed, would made new horcrux, how can Harry be then one of them?
Bigger Betty ye Pretty sure he didn’t get eaten lol
I mean it would have been lily who had been eaten but im pretty sure she wasnt
maybe it’s why the scar is there. idk
His soul was so unstable at that point that it detached without a ritual and latched onto Harry, the only living soul at the time.
@@dinosaur3166 wrong
"Horcruxes were hinted at as far back as the Goblet of Fire" but, but the second book was literally based around a horcrux. Tom says "a piece of my soul in is this book". Dude you stuffed up
Thunderpony Wuiske but JKR came up whit the horcrux’s in the end of the series. Bc she knew she had to com up whit someting that made Harry surviev and Kill Voldemort whitout makeing Harry the real killer or someting like that.
Yeah, and the entire theory was disproved by the fact that Tom Riddle's (Voldemort's) dad, who he killed to create a horcrux, had a body in "perfect condition" so there was no sign that he could have possibly been eaten.
Jacob Lacey but lilys body is also in perfect condition. besides... eating the soul doesnt mean eating the body...
A Cute Berry But the Harry case was different, he had no intention of making him a horcrux. The killing curse ricocheted back to him, in his dying state he latched on to the nearest living being: Harry himself.
Queen Creepycandy hurm but still tho. it doesn't mean you have/need to eat their bodies as well if you want to eat their soul. i have read all books of harry n watch the movies but i didn't recall that? im open to change opinion however, if it's indeed told otherwise in books/movies/jk rowling.
There is one, GIGANTIC, hole in the final theory.
Harry returned to the Dursley's every year, including just after Sirius and Dumbledore had both died.
Yup
Maybe those were the times he was in remission from his illness, so they let him go home for a while
Yeah there’s this one also if Hogwarts isn’t real and it is just a mental hospital so does that mean Harry’s parents are alive and the whole story would be different. You see the reason why I thought that is because one Voldemort happen to have studied in Hogwarts which made him have more knowledge of magic. Two if Voldemort is knowledgeable of magic that can kill, he can kill anyone he wants. He happened to have killed lili and james potter with the magic he learned from hogwarts. Three then Harry won’t be alive because Lily and James seemed to have met each other at Hogwarts and fell for each other there.
@@beingamultistanisahardjob6226 Well, Harry is a Dursley :) No Potter
b/c his parents are dead and that was his only family
Let's be Honest, Snape is Alive is the Best Theory so far for many of us!
YES!!!!!!!!!!
Snape is my favourite professor
Tru
And also logical the potion can't survive an attack of snape??
That doesn't make sense
So i think he is alive
What Do You Mean Its Not A Theory Its The Real
Ok if he is alive so how they are gonna show us in their next movie like who will be the new severus cuz Alan has died so actor is gonna change right..?
Snape is my favorite character since the beginning
Rest in peace Rickman
Suresh Chandra Mathur same!
me too! i know all the beginnig he is not actualy bad person...rest in peace
FINALLY SOMEONE GETS MEEEEE
R.I.P. Alan Rickman
Rest in peace 😢 I really cried when he died. Snape was so misunderstood.......
"The oldest brother, in procession of the elder wand, is the oldest brother in a dissent of the first brother." WHAT?! I don't think you're speaking English. Who the hell is the older brother supposedly representing?
Voldemort!
Finally! I was scrolling through comments thinking surely someone else had noticed this first sentence making absolutely no sense and the made up word of "prossession."
Voldermort
We know that Voldemort is a descendant of the oldest brother
You will find the whole lot of answers in The Deathly Hallows book
Here's something to think about:
We all know that the reason Dumbledore didn't want to give Snape the DADA post in Hogwarts was because he didn't want him to get too attached with the dark arts so he'd return to Voldemort's side. But there could be another reason...
We know that Snape wanted the defence against the dark arts job from the start all along, but Dumbledore never gave him the job until book 6. People good at spotting patterns will also realise that the post is jinxed; no one can keep the post for more than a year. Snape was a crucial part of Dumbledore's plan to kill Voldemort, so he didn't want him to be faced with something bad as a result of having the DADA post, until the sixth book when Snape had done the unbreakable vow to kill Dumbledore, so he knew this was the time to let him have the post. Think about that, huh
Was it really jinxed though? And if it was, when and how would that happened?
You just broke my heart... Dumbledore knew that Harry must die.. and.. he didn't mind Severus to die too?
I told this my sister yesterday, it us the reason, right? XD
Gohondieli Voldemort applied for the job long beforehand and didn’t get it so he placed a jinx on it
@@gohondieli9232 Yes it was Dumbledore told Harry in the 6th book that not a single DADA teacher stayed more than a year since he refused the job to Voldemort.
I read a theory kind of similar to the last one where Harry had actually just dreamt all of it and at the end of the story he just wakes up right back at the cupboard under the stairs. His parents had in fact died in a car accident, he had no magical abilities at all, Ron and Hermione were just kids who lived in the neighbourhood and everyone else were just random people he had met but pretty much everything was just his imagination. He had created all of this in his head just as an escape from how his home life was.
R.I.P. Alan Rickman
we miss u alan rikman
R.I.P
Alex G237, he died on my birthday.
14/01
Alex G237 r u talkin about TVD?
🖤
Snape never would have shown up when Harry used the Resurrection Stone because he was nothing to Harry, regardless of his actions to keep Harry safe. Lupin was a father figure to Harry. He was his friend, and Harry was the godfather to Teddy, Lupin's son. There is absolutely no reason that Lupin wouldn't have shown up. Just because the movie doesn't elaborate on Harry and Lupin's relationship doesn't mean it wasn't deeper in the books.
Also, the theory about George Weasley really hurts my heart.
I see what u mean...
If Snape meant nothing to Harry why would he name his son after him, and speak of him so highly at the end of the 7th book. I think he realized in that moment he saw the memory of Snape that he was the guy that was the bravest and done much for him, and he totally should've been there.
If I recall correctly, Harry saw Snape's memories AFTER ressurrection hence he acknowledged what Snape was doing all that time and finally regarded him so highly. Then he named his son after him.
EugeneArgus you recall incorrectly
I'm sorry but I don't agree with you on the fact that Snape was nothing to Harry, in The Cursed Child Harry names his son after Snape and says he is the bravest man he ever knew
Imagine if the last line of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows would have been "And Harry woke up in his closet"
RØhan Δswal I feel like part of the fandom would kill themselves if that happened; and Rowling would just be all like "Haha suckers"
I'm sooo glad it didn't happen
Which Still She could of make and pissed a Lot of people and Maybe even have suicide but that 8 and 9 book to save Harry from the dursley and give him a normal loving family
Luna and Her family which it would of been weird since they are crazy in the book but really smart in real life and they love Harry as one of their kids but he basically falls for Luna like falls for her clumsiness but that would of been crazy anyways let's be glad it was all real
😂😂
I would grab every Harry Potter book I could find and burn them, screaming all the while that "IT'S ALL A LIE. IT'S. ALL. A. LIEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
The most messed up one is definitely that the migic world is all just in harry's head
the last one bothered me way more than it should have
Harun Tekin me too
Harun Tekin i can understand. It bothers me too
It makes me sad
It kind of defeated the whole awesomeness of the series
Harun Tekin didn't bother me tho. Dudley is a month older ( if I am not mistaken ) than Harry, so he can't be his brother.
I think Lockhart was hired because most people thought it was a cursed job and so very few people wanted to take it which led to him volunteering himself.
It does say so in the book. The trio asks Hagrid how Dumbledore hired Lockhart and that's basically his reply.
Yeah the theory is wrong he could still have asked lupin earlier...
And he volunteered because he wanted to look brave to his fans and all
Narwhalla i don’t think he CURSED the position, but he made sure that nobody lasted two years as a DADA teacher.
Ni' kerk that WOULD be cursing it. And it was revealed by JK that when Voldemort died the curse on the position was lifted. Powerful spells and curses are usually lifted once the wizard who originally cast them die.
I thought about this right now , could the first ever wizard be a muggle born?
prolly the other way around tbh like I can imagine a squib becoming so frustrated for not having magical abilities that s/he may break away from the wizarding world and live w/o any mention of magic. Over time as the generations pass they would eventually become muggles.
No way mudblood
that what you are
That makes sense.
She’s not a witch. She’s just a muggle
saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaameeeeeeeee r84838 jfjfjdjdj
The resurrection stone was used to bring back people Harry wanted to see.
I am actually shocked till this date that dumbeldore did't come when he used it
@@nishaa42 he had just realised that Dumbledore had legit protected him to be killed by Voldemort. I dont think he'd want to see his face. Especially now that he was about to die.
@@ajinkyabandiwdekar6495 well dumbledore knew he wouldn't die because of his mother's blood in voldemort's body. Dumbledore himself explained this in the station sequence . I am sure dumbeldore knew that before he died
@@nishaa42 not entirely sure about that. He did say he had a hunch. But this is supposed to be such an old form of magic that even he couldn’t 100% predict it so accurately.
So. Yea. Maybe you’re right. But. It could have gone either way.
@@nishaa42 this was just before the station sequence so he could just be angry at Dumbledore's intention, also simply, the marauders and Lily were more important to him
It would make sense that Snape, being a potion master AND a double agent, would carry many anti-venom types due to the high risk of his assassination by either side.
No it really wouldnt
Yes it really would.
It was basilisks venom tho
Epic Gamer88 nagini isn’t a Basalisk. And he died more from blood loss than the vemon
Juliett 1313 my man had his neck slashed and was in a meeting with his boss. How exactly was he a) supposed to see that coming or b) gonna fix a slashed neck with antivenom
IN THE BOOKS HADRID LITIERLY SAID THERE WAS NO ONE WANTING TO DO THE JOB BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT IT WAS JINXED!!!!!!
Well no one except for Snape...and he never got it.
What job?
@@slovakianpsycho Defense against the dark arts.
Well... It WAS jinxed.
@@a.e.1188 yeah, because Dumbledore was against it. And seeing how Snape was teaching in 6th book, he was right.
So, instead of saving his brother, he makes chocolate?
Well, we have heard the rule, never let anybody else see you when you go back in time. He couldn't have saved his brother without driving the whole battle into even further insanity. And even if none of them would be freaked out by George, there would still be a chance for him too to die in the battle if he went back to save his brother, and he might cause even more people to die. It's why in Cursed Child, Draco never went back in time after his wife died. He loved her and wanted to honour her memory more then to cause chaos and disrupt the future. I think George would have come to the same conclusion if he had a time turner. He loved Fred too much, but the people around him too, so he couldn't. If we were to speak that this theory is canon, which obviously is not.
Yeah you can’t really save someone tho cuz if you went back and saved them then there would be no reason to go back and save him thus bringing the world to an end full of paradoxes 🤯
BonBon LovesSushi wait you can’t let anyone see you... yet Hermione goes back and sits in a class full of people on a daily basis
+Richard Bellars I know, right! That's always made me wonder why Hermione got to use her timeturner to turn back time so she could be in class, but everyone in that class saw her. Also, when Harry and Hermione went to save Buckbeak, there you go again! Buckbeak AND Dumbledore saw them both, but nothing happened other than Buckbeak being saved. And another thing! I think it was Dumbledore that said this, but it was a part in the book of POA that no spell can reawaken the dead, yet a timeturner can save Buckbeak?! It confused me when I was first reading it, and it still confuses me today. Would someone kindly explain to me what the reason of all of this is for and please let it be accurate as possible?
Well, I think performing a spell to bring back the dead vs. going back in time to change an event from occurring, are two different things. As for Hermonine being able to use the time turner to be in class, she says herself that McGonagall gives it to her so she can take double the work load that year. So she would see two differ groups of students during a class hour not the same one (if that makes sense). For example, if she had potions and charms at the same time, she would sit thru potions then use the time turner after to go back and do charms which would be a differ set of students. It's hard to explain but makes sense in my head lol.
You know what broke me? Seeing Tonks die. I see myself in her. Colored hair, doesn’t like people saying her name. Honestly. She was my favorite.
Her first name is actually pretty beautiful. "A gift (to the world) by nymphs". The gift of demigods.
Man, play Hogwarts Mystery and you'll feel even more broken. :(
She's one of the protagonist's best friends.
@@MRohanAhmed627 I know it’s so sad
Woman with colored hair= run away. Run away fast.
Are we just going to ignore the fact that he referred to Azkaban as a hospital?
bro that part killed me, harry potter is my life
Adam Young your so righhhhttt
Nope- here I am screaming at a computer 🤪
@Powerfulrainbow Cat Yep, lots of people describe mental health facilities as 'like a prison'. It's calling it a hospital within the theory of insanity. He SEES it as a prison but it is in fact (within the theory) a high security hospital.
arthur and potter both have no parents, must be related...? i have parents and you have parents aswel! are we related?
Remco Sloove yeah it doesn't make sense, they do comparable things, but reincarnation? I thought the only way to return was as a ghost, and they say it as if being the reincarnation of Arthur made Harry's parents die, because it had to be the same or something, it's weird!!
I totally agree, plus pulling the sword from the hat was based off of it but doesn't mean that it is exactly it. Neville also pulled it out of the hat. Just because his ancestors did something doesn't mean that you do the exact same thing. If you look up the Potters family tree there is no mention whatsoever as Arthur. Also surely that would make Harry a living relative of a king and wouldn't everyone have told him that. He should be ruling England.
Remco Sloove things like that are usually done in movies for a reason. But this one does just seem like a fan theory lol
I thought the whole of them pulling the sword out of the Hat was that they may have a relation to godric Gryffindor. After all the hex that's on it only one minute shows true Spirit of the house or whatever symbol of the sword in the Hat. And with the whole Voldemort being related the Slytherin being little parallel between the two/three.
Remco Sloove do you have a sword too??
According to Pottermore, if Nevilles first wand was made of ash wood and had a core of unicorn hair it is very likely that was just to much attached to its first owner to be of any great use for him. The same is true about Rons first wand, which he got from his older brother. In both cases it would explain, why both, Ron an Neville, got way more powerfull after they finally got wands suited to them.
I heard that theory!
Notice also that in OotP, when Neville gets serious about the DA, that's when he starts to improve drastically. It's also the book where we really see the Longbottoms. Perhaps his father's wand would have worked well for him from then on, but when he started taking his education of DADA seriously, he was following in his father's footsteps. Taking a stand against the dark arts and actively learning spells and tactics to that end could have proven to his father's wand he was worthy of its loyalty. As wands in this universe are seemingly sentient to some degree, him showing the wand he's serious about its original owner's path and goals could have been the spark for wand and wizard to finally click. Perhaps even a way to.win its allegiance, as it's shown killing the previous owner isn't the only way to do so. Even before getting a wand truly suited to him, still using his father's, he was part of a small group that went toe to toe with death eaters and the entire group hs went to the Ministry with survived. His progression through the book shows that the wand and he had bonded over the course of DA training. And then, in DH, he essentially led most of Hogwarts's students against the Dark Lord himself and proved his true spirit of bravery, after enduring torture for the better part of the year. It becomes increasingly clear he is a powerful wizard, but justa took awhile to bloom, and the uncooperative wand didn't help
Or there's the fact that Neville's dad was still alive, which the wand would have known(?) and so refused to have anything to do with Neville.
+Slyfox cub I think there's this thing about unicorn hair cores sometimes dying when their owner dies? If the wand could have "known" something, then probably through that.
Although it begs the question if a wand can recognize when it's owner's mind has been destroyed. Do they just react to the magic or to the whole person?
You saw this at SuperCarlinBrothers. If you're gonna steal their theory, at least put a link to their video.
"Wonka has a hearing problem in his left ear"
Video clip: *gestures to right ear*
The video points to his right ear. He's facing us, so it's on your left on the screen. Good day.
I noticed the same thing!
@Ella Wright You have to remember that someone who is sitting opposite you has their left on your right. They are facing the opposite direction, so their left looks like it's on the right for you. Even otherwise, George and Willy Wonka point to different eats from each other.
He might have been saying something like “you’ll have to speak into this ear” when he pointed to the right one
@@luminoustorus548 i did have to pull up a clip 😂 i had forgotten all about this but he is gesturing to his deaf ear in the movie. I still love the theory, i just thought it was funny that they chose to use that clip
Actually, horcruxes were hinted with the diary in chamber of secrets
That was a horcrux as well
Ya but we didn’t know that is was a horcrux or what a horcrux was
@@jaketaylor562 well that's true
@@jaketaylor562 People had already made the connection to the One Ring from LOTR back then.
The first theory has massive holes. For starters, Snape never cared for Harry, nor did he die for Harry. Everything he did was for Lily. There would be no reason for Snape to show up in the resurrection stone since all of those who did show up had an intimate connection with Harry that was predicated on love. Snape didn't love Harry or even like Harry. Snape was my favorite character and so I would love for him to still be alive, but that theory is just not practical.
The Piper Report or The Logical answer besides that is that even still dying. Can't resurrect somebody that's still alive. Even if they're trying to say he was like a bitchy uncle.
Care definition: "the provision of what is necessary for the health, welfare, maintenance, and protection of someone or something." He did care for Harry whether he did it for Lily or not is irrelevant to his actions of caring for him.
Divine Campe he gave a level of care, yes, in the concrete sense. He did not care for him in the emotional sense. Harry was too much a symbol of Snape's own errors, what could have been for him, and an endless reminder of the brutal bully who made most of his school experience a living nightmare. And had Harry not been born, Voldemort would not have gone out of his way to go after the Potters, Lily coould have still been alive, and even not with Snape, hope springs eternal. Harry represents the mistakes Snape made, from driving his best friend and unrrequited love of his life away, spying for Voldemort, and all his prideful failing between. In the end, Snape was a good man and brave as hell, even though he went through a time of being dark that few could ever redeem themselves from. He's a complex character and that's part of why the fanbase loves him. From a human standpoint he's a massive prick at best, and that never remedies, but he also fought the good fight and was a key.part of its success. It's not even jerk with a heart of gold status, he's a jerk to the core, but he had moral standards he developed from having been on both sides, and ended up drawing the line at true evil.
But he DID care for Harry even though it might have been subconscious because that was the only part of Lily left.
He admitted to Dumbeldore in book 7 that he didn't care for Harry even after all the years he spent protecting him. Everything Snape did was for Lily. I was upset that Snape died but JK did it right. She didn't have him sacrifice himself for Harry; she didn't have him jump in front of a spell for Harry, etc. His death was accurate in terms of his feelings for Harry. It would have been out of his character for him to die by sacrificing himself for someone he never cared for.
On a scale of one to ten, I give this about a nine and three-quarters.
The VFX Wizard lol
The VFX Wizard ah I get it
AH AHAHAHAHA
Stop
Nice one.
What if J.K Rowling ended the Harry Potter series by saying "and then Harry woke up in the cupboard under the stairs"
That would literally cause riots
That would be sick but I kw u didn’t think of it
I would prolly go under trauma and develop my own wizarding world
I would have cried
That would mean he was seeing the future
Dear Molly Weasley
Thank you for taking care of my son. I hope he is well. Thank you for taking care of him all these years when I have not been able to. Thank you. I'm taking care of your son up here as you have done with mine. Fred is well and happy though he does miss you. Good bye Molly.
-Love Lily Potter
Edit: thanks for 100 likes
LunarWolf1010 _ very touching
LunarWolf1010 _ chill. Its a common name.
Why do people do this
Lunar wolf in crying
Lunar wolf what I mean is, no offense, but I don’t get why people comment stuff like this. Not trying to hate or anything
1:42 how would antidote to snake venom help him if his throat was slit open
Essense of Dittany ofcourse
Well in 6th film he was able to heal Draco who had multiple holes in it
Aurthor weasey almost died from an attack by nagini. It’s more about the blood loss than venom. Not to sure snape was up to the mental strength it took to heal himself after bleeding like that. Plus he pretty much sacrificed himself to Voldemort so Harry could go on and do what he had to do.
@aka nezumi nagini is depicted as python in movies but nagini in hindi language means a female cobra
He could by summoning iron man's gauntlets and use them to put the thing on his throat just like tony stark did when thanos put the knife through him or when hulk tried to use the infinity gauntlet
Here's my Theory. Nobody at Screen Rant has ever watched or read an interview with Jo Rowling.
No matter how many times people correct them on the pronunciation of her name (It's Rowling as in Bowling, not Raoling as in Howling) they can never seem to get it right.
Saimeren Its LeviOHHHsa, Not Leviosaa
Which is, technically speaking, THE single most unimportant detail in the entire video (and perhaps channel). Just saying
👏👏👏
English people call an argument a row. It’s said rao
Soo maybe that’s why.
Also
Wow
Row-ling
Think you’re thinking too much into it
Saimeren no it’s not
This is just my opinion, but I feel like Snape's final words should've been "you have beautiful eyes." Instead of "you have your mother's eyes." Everyone says that Harry has his mother's eyes, so hearing it from Snape didn't feel TOO special. It was good, but it didn't feel REALLY special. This new version acknowledges Snapes love for Lily, I think.
don't forget neville was able to pull the sword from the hat also
Any worthy Griffindor can.
I pulled the knife out of my friends hat. I must be king arthur
What's the whole deal with the possibility of him ending up "the chosen one" instead of harry? I never understood that
Sunny 卌: It was because Voldemort only heard the first half of the prophecy. According to Voldemort, both Harry's parents and Neville's were against him, but if Voldemort had gone to the Longbottoms instead of the Potters that fateful night, Neville would have been the chosen one.
Oh yes and both Harry and Neville were born in the same month that was mentioned in the first half of the prophecy.
Because Neville was born the same day as Harry and the Prophecy mentioned the date of Birth so Voldy could have gone either for Harry or Neville.
10:04 it makes no sense when you think about it. Voldemort would’ve had to eat Lily’s flesh to turn Harry into a horcrux but Harry was an accidental horcrux. It’s impossible to have an accidental horcrux with the Cannable theory
No no you have got a point
Harry technically isn’t a full horcrux, it’s just that part of Voldemort was sort of stuck to him
And also, the first horcrux he ever made was by killing his father and his body was fully intact
@@arankahillebrink4218 Was the first horcrux Riddle Sr, I thought the first one was the Diary, and he made it by killing Myrtle
medafan53 yeah the first horcrux was the ring by killing Tom Riddle Sr
There's a lot wrong with what you're saying:
1. Who says they searched for bodies in the Shrieking Shack? There's absolutely no reason for anyone to go look there, it's far from the Hogwarts grounds, so no wonder they didn't find Snape (and even if they did, Harry didn't look at all the bodies). And Nagini's venom is pretty incurable, look at how much trouble the Healers had at healing Arthur in St. Mungo's!!
3. Dumbledore didn't posess the three Hallows at the same time, he found the Stone years after he'd given away the Cloak, and he never truthfully owned the Cloak, only Harry posessed the three of them at the same time. Just ask Dumbledore, in "King's Cross" he says that Harry is the true Master of Death!!
6. Who was the other Gryffindor girl besides Lavender and Parvati? Her name is definitely NEVER mentioned in the books, I'm 100% sure she doesn't exist!!! And we don't see the whole Sorting Ceremony in the books, we don't see Dean getting sorted (I've checked all the Gryffindors).
7. Ron's first wand was second hand too, and he too wasnt very good at the beginning.
8. Did Voldemort eat himself in order to make Harry a Horcrux? I believe his body was never found... (But then he would've known that Harry was a Horcrux).
9. Hagrid said Lockhart was the only candidate that year, mostly because Quirrell's death scared people off, and of course Dumbledore knew Lockhart was a fraud, Dumbledore is the smartest character of the whole series.
And Harry being the reincarnation of King Arthur doesn't make sense either. They do comparable things, but reincarnation? I thought the only way to return was as a ghost, and they say it as if being the reincarnation made all the comparable thins happen, so his parents die, because it had to be the same as with Arthur's parents or something, it's weird! And besides, WEASLEY IS OUR KING!!!
anything is possible with magic bro
6. We certainly *don't* see the whole Sorting Ceremony in the books. Crabbe and Goyle are only mentioned during it as Malfoy 'went to join his friends ... looking pleased with himself' after being Sorted into Slitherin. And they *are* first years at that point.
I agree with you that most of these theories have holes in them, but with No. 8, its different. The reason Harry became a horcrux is not because Voldy did his ritual, but rather by accident. Harry became a horcrux because when Voldemort's spell backfired and hit Voldemort, his soul was already very very fragile, because thats what five horcruxes do to a soul. Therefore, when Voldemort was hit by his killing curse, his soul basically left his body and latched onto the only living thing around at the time: Harry, thus making Harry an accidental horcrux.
Dagmar Eileen Snapes body wasnt in the Skrieking Shack, it was in the boat house at Hogwarts. Not far away at all.
Screen Rant: *DARK THEORIES*
Video: Our theory is one of the heroes survives
Umm... Except the books actually address the reason why Lockhart was hired... Hagrid tells Harry that he was the only available option and that Dumbledore knew he was a fake.
Also, just because there are parallels in two people's lives doesn't make them related..
xKerensax +lilys body was in the house when snape came (after voldemort left) and cried over it but harry is still a horcrux = u dont need to eat the persons flesh
Have you ever seen a 12 minute video, filled with theories, that actualy seemed researched well? I am yet to find one...
Thank you
xKerensax that's what I said
Um... Wonka points to his right ear and Wealeys left ear was injured. Which, if you're keeping track, are really two different ears. Just sayin'.
Christopher Turner Wonka points to his right ear to tell the kids to speak to him in that ear instead of his left.
It's BS of the purest ray supreme, since both are WORKS OF FICTION, and by different authors, separated by several decades. It's always surprised me that so many adults keep thinking of movies and novels as real, instead of entertainment for kids. It's FICTION, people!
Oldenweery what difference does it being fiction make to the fan theory? If people thought George Weasley was Ed Sheeran or something that would be dumb, but why can't two bits of fiction be linked?
Oldenweery, that's just your opinion.....muggle.
Oldenweery nobody said they were real. They don’t have to be real for them to be connected anyway. There’s plenty of games that are connected and all those are fake. Them being separated by decades doesn’t really matter either, as the newer of the films could easily just find a way to write it in. I must say that I don’t think they’re connected at all either, I just don’t agree with your reasoning
when you realise snape was the good guy all along
Snape was worse in the books
Snape wasn't a good guy. He wasn't a bad guy either, but he was definitely not a good guy.
1. He bullied many students , without any good reason to and let it affect his teaching, which was unacceptable
2. He tried to send to inocent men to azkaban , because of a school boy grudge.
3. He judged people due to their blood status.
He did many good things and was very brave but he was still a bully and a liar who was willing to hurt inocent people. So he was definitely a very mixed character
@@queenofpeanutbutter3355 Number 1 is correct, but no one, not even Remus knew Sirius was innocent until Harry did.
Jessie Art he became my favorite side character at that point. More so than Dumbledore and McGonagall.
yeah i hated Snape for killing Dumbledore after reading the half blood prince but then i read that in deathly hallows and he became my fav character
You know what would actually scare Voldemort?
Dead bodies and the dark, he’s secretly scared of the both of them
Whoever did the editing deserves a round of applause 👏🏼
Points to right ear: "Hearing problem with his left ear." LMAOOO
Its almost like illegal content is flipped backwards to avoid copyright scanners... Just watch when you're watching these types of vids you'll see backwards words in the background and US cars driving on the left.. stuff like that
@Moxxuren would be an interesting idea, EXCEPT you can easily find that scene and unfortunately it isn’t backwards. He does indeed point to his right ear in the said scene they show.
Sooooo yeah, Wonka is “hard of hearing” in his right ear not left.
Theory debunked.
no he did point to his left ear try positioning yourself like him and it will be the left ear stoopid jkjkjk
Laughing your butt off off off?
Random fact, horrocroxes split your soul in half, so Harry had more of Voldemort's soul than Voldemort. The ring had 50% diary 25% locket12.5% Ravenclaw's diadem 6.25% Hufflepuff cup 3.125% Harry then 1.5625% Nagini. That leaves 1.5625% of his soul left in himself. I am not sure whether the cup or the diadem came first, I think it is the diadem, but I can't be certain.
Chasam P The Diadem came first, he heard about it during school years and straight after school (after asking to be assigned as DADA teacher to Prof. Dippet, of course) he went to find it and claim it as a horcrux.
do I spy a film theory reference
Film theory much?
"horrocroxes"????????
Actually hufflepuff's cup was first
“No matter what though, they are definately magical”
Harry: Excellent
Me: * uncontrollable laughing*
They only showed 10 students getting sorted bc you only really need to know the important characters. In the book they skip from like T to Z bc Harry is admiring the castle and things and it is describing that. They're are obviously more people bc in the 3rd movie the guy who knows what the Grimm is is from Gryffindor. So that's one more Gryffindor in the same year, plus who knows how many more?
Clara Dyson there are 20 brooms, for Slytherin & Gryffindor. So approximately 40 pupils per year, which results in 1250 students in the whole school.
The "only 10 students" and / or reduced intake of students thing would kinda explain why so many rooms were empty and could be used for hiding a mirror, flying keys, killer plants, stupidly large moving chess board and a giant three headed dog called Fluffy!
What if deathly Hallows ended like...." And after all this Harry woke up,with Mr.Dursley shouting,Harrryyyyy!!!"Imagine 😂
Mr. Dursley never called him by his name, it would be *oye you*
Asmi Nandy or “BOY”
@@CharlotteN555 yeah, right
Or *filthy loathsome little gremlin ..*
Go get the mail bOy
George as Wonka breaks my heart.
Alex Witherspoon good for you but the theory doesn't make any sense
Alex Witherspoon yeah so much
Ian Chok pretty sure they come back in Cursed Child
Alex Witherspoon omg ewww no no not true
I agree, it’s so sweet. Wouldn’t be surprised if J.K Rowling at least played with the thought.
Ah yes, Snape being alive is "dark"
Also the number 13 theory applies to Sirius. Because at dinner there were 13 people and he was the first to leave and then he died the next day.
Oh my god your right MY MIND HURTS NOWWW XD
I think his death was the saddest
Lybah Ali His, Madeye's, Lupin's and Fred's Deaths Literally made me cry
Snape wasn't in the Great Hall because he wasn't killed in the castle or on the grounds. He was killed in the Shrieking Shack, and no one's supposed to know he was there, so no one would've known to collect him.
EmileeArsenic He died in the Boat House
Harry would've known
Gideon Debateau in the books he died in the Shrieking Shack, and even if they knew his location that's far away and hard to get there because of the Whomping Willow and the blocked tunnel.
And right now there is no chance of seeing snape again in the movie. No way JK Rowling will revive snape with different actor
He died in the boat house in the movies, and the very title of this video is that it deals with the movie theories of Harry Potter... You have read the title, right?
Making of Horcrux
It is said that when Lily was killed by Tom, Harry became his Horcrux, Voldemort was not even aware that Harry is his Horcrux... He never consumed Lily...
FlarePhoenix that's what I thought...but since he could tap into Harry's thoughts since birth...he could be known more.
FlarePhoenix he was holding her (snaps was)
we know that killing rips the soul (its even stated by snape in the halfblood prince) but i think in order to get that piece of soul that got ripped and conceal it in an object to make a horcrux you need to do some act of evil before preforming the charm to make the actual horcrux. So i think on the night that voldemort killed James and lily his soul actually split into 3 (bcz he murdered james and lily and then there is his own soul) and when he tried to kill harry the spell backfired killing one part of his soul, and one part attached itself to the only living thing it found which was harry, and the last part of his soul fled as we know it said in the books he was ripped off his body less than a spirit less than a meanest ghost yet he was still alive
Here's my personal theory:
Belle from Beauty and the Beast is actually Hermione from the future!
Story: Hermione realized that something wasn't quite right about her favorite French history book entitled, "Beauty and the Beast". She reads even deeper into the story to find that before Belle could actually save the beast from his curse, so Hermione takes Belle's place, and realizes that the town is full of biggots who shame a girl for reading, so she does everything Beauty and the Beast to save the beast from his curse!
Evidence: Her use of a time turner, her striking physical similarities to Belle, and her personality!
Actually the only person who has owned all of the deathly hallows. Dumbledore may have borrowed the cloak, but it wasn’t his. Neither was the wand. Harry had the cloak as an inheritance, the stone as a right of conquest, the wand from Draco who got it from Dumbledore.
Besides, Dumbledore never possessed all the Deathly Hallows at the same time. He gave the cloak back to Harry during the first year and found the stone before the sixth, when he didn't have the cloak anymore.
Dumbledore did own the wand. He won it from Grindelwald. Also, JK approved the theory, but yea ur right about the cloak.
Also, in addition to everything already said to this, the cloak is, according to the tale, given - if I remember correctly - "from father to son, from mother to daughter". Meaning there's no way anyone outside Harry's lineage and possible side-lineages traceable to his lineage would ever be able to unite to Hallows. You'd have to be a direct descendant of Ignotus to inherit the cloak, without which uniting the Hallows is plain impossible.
Did we really want to see 35 Gryffindors, Slytherins, Hufflepuffs and ravenclaws sorted?
Cerys Roberts I did
Nope
I'd rather see more house elves scenes and the marauders story
No, they PURPOSEFULLY only showed the important ones, plus that would add to screen time, and why the heck bother?
Neville Longbottom also pulled the Gryffindor sword from the hat
Christian Johansen there's also a theory that harry wasn't the chosen one from the prophecy as both he and neville fit the description
Wayne Brown it’s not a theory they say it outright in the books.
Harry potters parents get killed:
Aurther: damnit not this again
author
@Bob the Fish idk
Cannibalism is not how to make a horrcrux. We know that Tom riddles father was murdered for the creation of a horrcrux, But he was buried in the grave yard that we see in the fourth book. So, Voldemort could not have eaten his father.
Noah Robbins who said he had to eat the whole body 🙈 + in the GOF (movie)all that was at his fathers grave was 1 bone that we could see so who knows, JK said herself editors almost puked at the original way to make a haurcrux so it’s plausible
The movies aren’t cannon though. Only the books are. Anything introduced in the movie is not true to the Harry Potter universe.
Noah Robbins then why bother watching these videos if nothing matters but the book 🙈🙈🙈
It's impossible because we know that Harry was made a horcrux by mistake... I mean did Voldemort eat Lily and James by accident or something?
in the book they only need the bone. Voldy could have still eaten him
Anyone can pull the sqord of Griffindor as long as he/she is a true Griffindor
Which actually even happened in the final battle: Nevill pulled the sword from the hat too.
EXACTLY
:)
THE LAST OND IS INSANE!!!😲😲😲😲
natalie gorczyk I
Also the one before that. It's sad in the book that nobody wants to teach that subject in Hogwarts since the position is "cursed". Nobody could remain there for a long time
Quan Nguyen Anh but snape has been after the job for years
Is there a link to find the full theory for the last one?
More proof is that when harry was talking with Dumbledore , Dumbledore said "Of course this is all in your head but that doesn't mean that it's not real"