10 Important Details You Totally Missed In The Harry Potter Movies

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • 10 secrets you probably never noticed in the Harry Potter movies! Subscribe to our channel: goo.gl/ho3Hg6
    No matter how many times you’ve seen the Harry Potter films, there are small moments and details you may have forgotten about. Warner Bros and J.K. Rowling went to great lengths to create a highly detailed world which feels real and expansive. Take a journey back to these films and see all the small details you missed over the years.
    The Deathly Hallows symbol represents the master of death and wasn’t introduced until the final two Harry Potter movies. Look closely in an earlier movie and you will see a sign of what’s to come. The number 7 has major significance in the Harry Potter series and the strong connection does not go unnoticed. Snape may have been playing along as a Death Eater, but one wizardly battle showcases how clever he was at acting bad but still doing good deeds. Gilderoy Lockhart was a phony in so many ways right down to the last hair on his head. Ron Weasley's family obviously comes from very little money and the production crew went to great details to showcase how poor they actually were. Dumbledore not only had a great office, but he also had a small bedroom and secret lair attached to the office. As Harry Potter prepares to visit the Ministry of Magic, he enters a phone booth with a secret code even a muggle could figure out. One of the more memorable early scenes in Harry Potter includes the chocolate frog that comes to life and hops off the train. In the final Harry Potter movie it seems as if the chocolate frog has returned. Watch to see all these moments and more!
    #HarryPotter
    Check Out These Other Amazing Videos:
    15 Harry Potter Actors Who Look Completely Different Today
    • 15 Harry Potter Actors...
    10 Secrets About Margot Robbie That Will Shock You
    • 10 Secrets About Margo...
    Featuring:
    THE DEATHLY HALLOWS SYMBOL
    THE NUMBER 7
    SNAPE THE SAVIOR
    LOCKHART’S WIG
    RON’S ROBE AND WAND
    DUMBLEDORE’S BEDROOM
    DIAL MAGIC
    THE CHOCOLATE FROG RETURNS
    SNAPE’S SECRET LOVES
    THE DISAPPEARANCE OF SUSAN BONES
    Our Social Media:
    / screenrant
    / screenrant
    plus.google.co...
    Our Website
    screenrant.com/
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @NoxPiscez
    @NoxPiscez 6 років тому +643

    In the books, there are 7 obstacles you have to pass to get to the philosophers stone: Fluffy, the Devils Snare, the flying keys, the giant chess, a Troll, Snapes potions riddle and the mirror of erised

    • @sagamakila5286
      @sagamakila5286 6 років тому +24

      the troll was kind of already done in the girls bathroom... but i still think they should have added in the the potions!!!!

    • @musicandcomedytk2800
      @musicandcomedytk2800 6 років тому +4

      Saga Mäkilä there were 2

    • @sofiachoudhri7411
      @sofiachoudhri7411 6 років тому +6

      Troll doesn’t guard it...

    • @endyender1703
      @endyender1703 6 років тому +3

      musicand comedytk 2? Explain.

    • @jessebubba1926
      @jessebubba1926 6 років тому +7

      Hermione Granger If you read the books it tells you that the troll was Professor Quirrell’s defence since each teacher had a defence. And the reason it’s not there is because Quirrell released the troll to create a diversion and Harry defeated it.

  • @vanessaroberts7058
    @vanessaroberts7058 6 років тому +142

    You don't have to look at how faded Ron's cloak is to now that it is a hand me down because Draco Malfoy says it in the first film!

    • @liamdownes1475
      @liamdownes1475 4 роки тому +2

      Yes, but having a character say something in a movie is poor writing. If you can show it too it adds to the effect on us as an audience.

  • @whutzat
    @whutzat 6 років тому +335

    I didn't take the chocolate frog at the end to be THE chocolate frog....just one in general, such as those darn chocolate frogs are still sold on the train and still making mischief.

    • @jessebubba1926
      @jessebubba1926 6 років тому +6

      whutzat But let’s be honest it’s pretty clear that’s what they were referencing to. It’s not like they added it not knowing it was an easter egg.

    • @jacksparrowismydaddy
      @jacksparrowismydaddy 6 років тому +9

      and they have one good jump in them before they turn to pure chocolate. its just a candy like a pushpop or wax lips...

    • @kittycas3652
      @kittycas3652 5 років тому +1

      Hahaha I like your thinking!

    • @JamesCharIes
      @JamesCharIes 4 роки тому

      whutzat true!

  • @InternetReviewerGuy
    @InternetReviewerGuy 6 років тому +1739

    I already knew 9 and 3/4 of these.

    • @eitan3655
      @eitan3655 6 років тому +3

      InternetReviewerGuy (King’s Cross reference)

    • @timmason7430
      @timmason7430 6 років тому

      Rofl......................................

    • @Awesomeferret10
      @Awesomeferret10 6 років тому +1

      HA I did not get it then I looked closer POTTERHEAD FOR LIFE

    • @ferrarigirl666
      @ferrarigirl666 6 років тому +3

      You nailed it!

    • @amandaweeks93
      @amandaweeks93 6 років тому +3

      ha ha i see what you did there

  • @jojogranger6727
    @jojogranger6727 5 років тому +334

    RON’S OLD WAND IS CHARLIE’S, NOT PERCY’S!!!

    • @taylorboys3791
      @taylorboys3791 4 роки тому +6

      I know obliviously they don't

    • @user-qe3wg5jm2n
      @user-qe3wg5jm2n 4 роки тому +4

      Taylor Boys ah I see what you did there ;) (obliviate, obviously)

    • @pixiethecanary7666
      @pixiethecanary7666 4 роки тому +1

      @@user-qe3wg5jm2n avada kedavra

    • @stolas6795
      @stolas6795 4 роки тому +1

      Hoot Hoot (Go back to your grave, dead man.)

    • @quinlanb7193
      @quinlanb7193 3 роки тому +5

      And in the book they say that he got a new wand in PofA when Ron sends Harry a letter about them winning the galleons

  • @yashaswidas7235
    @yashaswidas7235 5 років тому +30

    When Snape asks that question to Harry which secretly was meant for his love to Lily was my most favourite part!!

  • @MelodyJoy7813
    @MelodyJoy7813 6 років тому +1573

    Ron's parents buy him a brand new wand before PoA starts which is something you'd know if you read the books

    • @danielinnes3954
      @danielinnes3954 6 років тому +34

      Melody Knight-Brown I know it's like they have never even done the slightest research they just saw things that they thought no one else that's all she said hey let's do it good just reading the books through once you would know half of the answers and be clearly easy to know

    • @heathcook1663
      @heathcook1663 6 років тому +36

      This video is based on the movies. Read the title.

    • @arstan8092
      @arstan8092 6 років тому +23

      Sure but that was still an ignorant statement. You can not talk about a series just looking at its covers. The movies are pretty much the movies covers and what is true and known in the books are also true in the movies. He also refered to the books multiple times in the video so he can not use that excuse :P

    • @heathcook1663
      @heathcook1663 6 років тому +5

      Arstan.....fair enough. Lol.

    • @gabby17908
      @gabby17908 6 років тому +3

      You beat me to it I was going to say that one

  • @medhanshmahto4879
    @medhanshmahto4879 6 років тому +40

    Honestly I was damn suprised when people found Snape negative at first. Cause I don't know why but I never felt he could be bad after I've heard professor squirrel say that he wanted to save Harry

    • @Awesomeferret10
      @Awesomeferret10 6 років тому +8

      I don’t mean to laugh but professor squirrel? Check your spelling

    • @tatumtrubee8430
      @tatumtrubee8430 4 роки тому +1

      medhansh mahto same

  • @drose9402
    @drose9402 6 років тому +859

    Another 7 link is that there are seven Weasley children

    • @juananz007
      @juananz007 6 років тому +85

      7 players on a Quidditch team

    • @inkeriananas
      @inkeriananas 6 років тому +82

      Seven years in school at Hogwarts

    • @tanbir11
      @tanbir11 6 років тому

      the kit was cause of becks

    • @redhotgillypeppers
      @redhotgillypeppers 6 років тому +70

      harry born in the 7th month

    • @jhanvigupta6758
      @jhanvigupta6758 6 років тому +67

      7 obstacles in philosopher's stone, 7 horcruxes

  • @nataliespitz4877
    @nataliespitz4877 4 роки тому +200

    I noticed that in the chamber of secrets, during transfiguration, Ron’s “rat” turns into half rat/half mug. I wondered if this was because scabbers was really an animagous. The magic was supposed to turn an animal into an object, not a human. Idk that could be incorrect 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @tatumtrubee8430
      @tatumtrubee8430 4 роки тому +9

      Natalie Spitz thats good

    • @theolangovender2897
      @theolangovender2897 4 роки тому +11

      I think rons wand was also broken at that point by the willow tree. He gets a new wand in the beginning of the 3rd book, after his fam wins that gold and goes to Egypt.

    • @youtubelife921
      @youtubelife921 4 роки тому +6

      Human transfiguration is meant to be much harder than animal transfiguration so maybe that’s partially why Ron struggles with transfiguring ‘scabbers’ as well as his broken wand

    • @Mendozer7502
      @Mendozer7502 4 роки тому

      But the point of transfiguration is to do just that. Completely transfigure. So for all tense and purposes hes a rat that was a wizard. That can go back if he chooses. But when hes in "rat form" he loses the ability to do spells and such. His transformation back to a human is more of a natural thing. No spells or anything special just clear mind. Besides when you transform your drop everything anyway. I played alot of D&D and was a DM for a while. So I'm just looking at this from that point of what happens when a character "druid" turns in to a wolf. Unless he has very hard to get feats. Hes/shes just a badass wolf who cant cast any of its spells untill it turns back.

    • @goodlifewiththegoodmans849
      @goodlifewiththegoodmans849 4 роки тому +1

      I’ve wondered that a lot Natalie Spitz

  • @michaelsternberg7320
    @michaelsternberg7320 6 років тому +294

    Ron Weasley received a new wand it, it said so in the book right after his family won some money.

    • @rosarioperez8421
      @rosarioperez8421 6 років тому +1

      Remind me again, how they came into some money?

    • @john.jambek3695
      @john.jambek3695 6 років тому +7

      They won a prize From the daily Prophet

    • @factbeaglesarebest
      @factbeaglesarebest 6 років тому +6

      rosario perez Senior Weasley worked for the Ministry... yes the family doesn’t have immense amounts of money... but they were not DIRT poor... just a big family... written as per the handmedowns

    • @darthdiglett
      @darthdiglett 6 років тому +6

      rosario perez they won a draw in the daily prophet, so they used the money to buy ron's new Wand plus a trip to Egypt to visit Bill

    • @harriphillips7589
      @harriphillips7589 6 років тому

      Michael Sternberg just commented that

  • @ellagr1m3s
    @ellagr1m3s 4 роки тому +56

    guy: “snape the character we *lovedddd* to hate”
    me: **ive been in love with severus since i was 10**

    • @heleneduke5284
      @heleneduke5284 3 роки тому +2

      I've Been Inlove With Him Since I Was 7- Gotta Admit It SomeDay Lol

  • @jamesaditya5254
    @jamesaditya5254 6 років тому +78

    Rowling did said she told the late Alan Rickman the story of Snape to get him into playing Snape in the movies. While she could come up with the idea much much later the general idea of a sincere, unrequited love is easily transmitted through the easter egg in the 1st movie

  • @BenSwagnerd
    @BenSwagnerd 6 років тому +103

    10 important details that screen rant missed but everyone else knew

  • @BuildsByCeyphe
    @BuildsByCeyphe 6 років тому +234

    "important details..." yeah, because susan bones is SUPER important...

    • @crippling_depression907
      @crippling_depression907 5 років тому +10

      Never noticed her in the books or movies

    • @eviegarciaaa
      @eviegarciaaa 5 років тому +12

      Christopher Heldgaard she's only mentioned like once in the movies and maybe twice in the books

    • @SkNiazi786
      @SkNiazi786 4 роки тому +2

      She's pretty hot though

    • @SkNiazi786
      @SkNiazi786 4 роки тому +1

      @tamara so was i when I liked her daaaa i was 16 back then.

    • @swapnihapuarachchi1383
      @swapnihapuarachchi1383 4 роки тому +2

      susan bones does add a thing or two to the story line

  • @tillytheunicorn954
    @tillytheunicorn954 6 років тому +730

    Did he just call it Hogwarts academy

    • @memesauce1230
      @memesauce1230 5 років тому +8

      Yes

    • @Pioneermapz
      @Pioneermapz 5 років тому +13

      Tilly The unicorn ik I bet he didn't even watch or read the books he just searched it up

    • @-Tidgy
      @-Tidgy 5 років тому +12

      Hmm Americans take over even English things. Very sad.

    • @navyalakhotia4859
      @navyalakhotia4859 4 роки тому +3

      Ikr I replayed it just in case I didn't hear it right

    • @carolinabeltran8420
      @carolinabeltran8420 4 роки тому +3

      He said hallows wrong...he be over here saying it fanvy or somethin

  • @lonelyprince0
    @lonelyprince0 6 років тому +59

    actually we do know about Ron's new wand, at least in the books.
    they bought him a new one after year 2, Ron showed it off in Diagon Alley when Harry caught up to him and Hermione

  • @patthegeek9677
    @patthegeek9677 6 років тому +815

    The only information I got from this was that you didn’t read the books.

    • @giovannapucci9053
      @giovannapucci9053 6 років тому +4

      Well I got enough information because I didn't read them 😊

    • @alecarvalho1614
      @alecarvalho1614 6 років тому +2

      Pat The Geek not everyone reads

    • @vlcn_dut
      @vlcn_dut 6 років тому +1

      OMG lol

    • @audreybigler7013
      @audreybigler7013 5 років тому +4

      @@giovannapucci9053 you really need to read them. You haven't lived until you do!!!!

    • @SaileshAgrawal
      @SaileshAgrawal 5 років тому

      Why will they made movies if all have to read the books?

  • @mila-ky5iv
    @mila-ky5iv 6 років тому +851

    These people need to read the books

    • @heathcook1663
      @heathcook1663 6 років тому +22

      Their name is ScreenRant.....as in they talk about movies. Lmao. This has nothing to do with the books.

    • @mila-ky5iv
      @mila-ky5iv 6 років тому +22

      Makin' Bacon fair point, but they reference the books. So if they want the video to just be about movies they need to say about it not including the information from the books

    • @heathcook1663
      @heathcook1663 6 років тому +2

      Emilia L.....touche'. Lol.

    • @olorinmithrandir8536
      @olorinmithrandir8536 6 років тому +2

      U need to shut up

    • @Drillusion
      @Drillusion 6 років тому +6

      Olorin Mithrandir no u

  • @andrewjames1366
    @andrewjames1366 4 роки тому +7

    The phone booth password was not low security - it was intended to be easy as it was the “visitors entrance”. In other words, it was for muggles and other outsiders who had business at the Ministry. Per the books, the “muggle prime minister” knew about the wizard world, so it is not inconceivable that other muggles would know about it too. Thus, the need for a low-security entrance.

  • @CharlieMacland
    @CharlieMacland 4 роки тому +16

    just so y'all know Snape has always been my favorite person. when he killed dumbledore i knew he had a reason for it, just as hating harry.

    • @willowcove888
      @willowcove888 2 роки тому

      and JKR's entire reason for being obsessed with 7 is because of her own bday. Such a Leo lol That's why Harry was given the same bday.

    • @mukherjeetm
      @mukherjeetm 2 роки тому

      @@willowcove888 But Harry's birthday was 31 July

  • @bonita3031
    @bonita3031 6 років тому +51

    In the books it says that Ron’s parents BOUGHT him another wand. (This was when they won the ministry lottery)

    • @dylanharvey9358
      @dylanharvey9358 5 років тому +1

      Have you read the title.
      None of these facts are about the book.

  • @hopacupaGUY
    @hopacupaGUY 4 роки тому +6

    Snape even takes the wands from deatheaters after they've been knocked down...cool detail

  • @laurapitner7573
    @laurapitner7573 5 років тому +18

    another link is that with the flying car Harry and Ron were seen by 7 muggles.

  • @cassandrathomas6015
    @cassandrathomas6015 6 років тому +37

    How are those phone booths hard to find these days? They're everywhere in London

  • @pradhumansharma5338
    @pradhumansharma5338 4 роки тому +19

    Hey what about presence of newt schmmander in Hogwarts at the time marauders map was introduced

  • @hollyludlow9339
    @hollyludlow9339 6 років тому +488

    Potterhead always

  • @bilparanormalinvestigator5696
    @bilparanormalinvestigator5696 6 років тому +15

    In the book his wand is replaced with a new one and from then on his magic skill improved

  • @willhatton2792
    @willhatton2792 6 років тому +959

    anyone else irritated when he called it the "Sorcerer's Stone"?

    • @KingZando
      @KingZando 6 років тому +117

      Nope because that’s the American name of the book.

    • @willhatton2792
      @willhatton2792 6 років тому +147

      King Zando does philosopher have too many letters for the colonies?

    • @DirteeTite
      @DirteeTite 6 років тому +103

      Maybe,but the book and author are British,it was changed to sorcerers stone because American publishers thought philosophers stone was too intellectually challenging for the American masses,you got to go with the original and proper title.

    • @corbingarrett1206
      @corbingarrett1206 6 років тому +22

      Martin Forde to us in the states sorcerers stone IS the original title! I wasn't aware it was changed just from philosopher until the 4th book was released and I was watching a news story on J.K.R.

    • @the_alexstone
      @the_alexstone 6 років тому +8

      Will Hatton no not at all

  • @lindseywhite3371
    @lindseywhite3371 4 роки тому +31

    You've clearly never read the books, or you would know half of these things.

  • @corbingarrett1206
    @corbingarrett1206 6 років тому +37

    If I remember right, Ron's wand is handed down from Charlie not Percy isn't it?

  • @LadySamurai88
    @LadySamurai88 6 років тому +5

    I Love Snape he is my favorite character from day and movie one!
    RIP Alan Rickman!

  • @pratikgaikwad6931
    @pratikgaikwad6931 6 років тому +37

    Another 7 link is that there are 7 players in Quidditch on each side

    • @scamlike1y
      @scamlike1y 6 років тому

      Pratik Gaikwad There's also 7 floors at Hogwarts

    • @pratikgaikwad6931
      @pratikgaikwad6931 6 років тому

      Yeah and in Deathly Hallows there are 7 Harry Potters in disguise to escape Lord Voldamort

    • @scamlike1y
      @scamlike1y 6 років тому

      Harry's Quidditch number is 7

    • @annar.7644
      @annar.7644 5 років тому

      The weasley family has 7 children

    • @lewisj8524
      @lewisj8524 4 роки тому

      Harry was born in the seventh month and so was Neville, two of the most important characters in the books and films

  • @SquishyOfCinder
    @SquishyOfCinder 6 років тому +101

    I think "Clickbaiting" should be a valid reason to flag videos

    • @paint1398
      @paint1398 6 років тому +2

      SquishyOfCinder I totally agree.

  • @MegaLama96
    @MegaLama96 6 років тому +128

    First of all, it isn´t Percy´s old wand. Ron is using Bill´s old wand. Second of all- how many of those did you find by yourself, and how many did you "borrow" from vidieos of other people? -_-

    • @ahsoka_tano_98
      @ahsoka_tano_98 6 років тому +18

      Miška Tomčíkova it's actually Charlie's old wand, people never get it right!!

    • @hannes_r
      @hannes_r 6 років тому +3

      Miška Tomčíkova iT is not bill his wand iT is from charlie

    • @MegaLama96
      @MegaLama96 6 років тому

      yes, I know.

    • @conroydylan3
      @conroydylan3 6 років тому +8

      And Charlie’s old wand combination of features makes it amazingly loyal to its original owner, therefore any other wizard using it would find it to be extremely inefficient and uncooperative.

    • @domusdebellum3042
      @domusdebellum3042 6 років тому

      why, chello there.

  • @joedoe7925
    @joedoe7925 6 років тому +7

    "Lockhart's wig" 😂😂😂

  • @magicman205
    @magicman205 6 років тому +26

    Really great list! However, I always thought the chocolate frog was an obvious callback to the first film. Isn't that why Hermoine giggles in the first place?

    • @inkeriananas
      @inkeriananas 6 років тому +2

      Magicman205
      That's not why she giggles, she wasn't even there the first time around.

    • @jessebubba1926
      @jessebubba1926 6 років тому +1

      She giggles cause of Ron’s failed colour changing attempt on his rat

    • @CJ-im2uu
      @CJ-im2uu 4 роки тому

      Hermione appeared after the frog escaped.

    • @JennifuhhGilardi
      @JennifuhhGilardi 2 роки тому

      @@jessebubba1926 I don’t think hermione is ever described as giggling

  • @DelightfulDiscs
    @DelightfulDiscs 6 років тому +81

    If you'd read the books you'd know that it wasn't Percy's wand, it was Dumbledores, and Ron's parents got him a new golden one with wifi capabilities. What's wrong with this guy? Obviously Harry was the 18th Horcrux, and it was called the philanthropist's stone... Jesus Christ almighty in the heavens, these people need to learn to read! Jk, most of the comments talk about reading the books but fail to read the 200 comments previously saying the same thing they are. Not that they're wrong. Just silly.

    • @luismv02
      @luismv02 6 років тому +3

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @LuhPlu2o
      @LuhPlu2o 6 років тому +3

      MondoSquad lmfaoooooo

    • @Lauren-vf4ft
      @Lauren-vf4ft 6 років тому +2

      MondoSquad It’s Sorcerers stone in US

    • @mayterivas6174
      @mayterivas6174 6 років тому +4

      Di you mean "Jk" or " *J.K.*

    • @davidmidcalf3470
      @davidmidcalf3470 5 років тому +5

      @@Lauren-vf4ft yeah the Americans may have called it that but as JK Rowling is British and Harry Potter was set in the UK it should only be known as the Philosophers Stone

  • @MaraLoeters
    @MaraLoeters 6 років тому +1098

    1. We didn’t miss anything
    2. If you’d read the books you wouldn’t sound so foolish in this video

    • @heathcook1663
      @heathcook1663 6 років тому +99

      1. Over 65% of people that saw the movies never read the books.
      2. This video is based on the movies as per the title.

    • @mila-ky5iv
      @mila-ky5iv 6 років тому +22

      Makin' Bacon but the title doesn’t match the video and they reference the books

    • @mila-ky5iv
      @mila-ky5iv 6 років тому +10

      Mara Loeters I hoped it wasn’t just me who thought those things

    • @Majliiis
      @Majliiis 6 років тому +22

      Just because you (and apparently someone else) didn’t miss anything, doesn’t mean everybody noticed it...

    • @musefan12345
      @musefan12345 6 років тому +32

      hahahaha theres always that one dickhead that uses the “read the books” argument because he thinks hes better than everyone else

  • @TylerK-gw7qf
    @TylerK-gw7qf 5 років тому +4

    Did anyone else notice in the 1st movie the way dumbludore claps. When Harry gets sorted into gryfondor he claps normally

  • @jennielizabethedwards5068
    @jennielizabethedwards5068 6 років тому +25

    Ron got a new wand

  • @bangtanfangirl314
    @bangtanfangirl314 3 роки тому

    Draco : Scared pottah ?!
    Harry : You wish !
    My favourite dialogue😂😂😂😂

  • @MaraLoeters
    @MaraLoeters 6 років тому +215

    Horcruxes don’t allow you to be born again and again?? Wth?? And if you meant the word as in borne it wouldn’t even make sense?!

    • @thefifthhorseman6090
      @thefifthhorseman6090 6 років тому +2

      Mara Loeters calm down we know

    • @Matthias_ger
      @Matthias_ger 6 років тому +5

      whats wrong with this girl?

    • @Sarasor
      @Sarasor 6 років тому +23

      Well in the goblet of fire he's kind of resurrected/born again in a way. The horocruxes makes your spirit stay so you can be brought back.

    • @sofias7254
      @sofias7254 6 років тому +3

      I totally agree, I hate that I clicked on this video, it just showed all the things the movie didn't include from the book

    • @minsuga5713
      @minsuga5713 6 років тому

      All horcruxes do is provide a way for you to come back. They essentially store your spirit

  • @kaitlynpuleo6668
    @kaitlynpuleo6668 6 років тому +125

    7 is literally descirbed in the book as the "magic number". It’s super intentional and supposed to be noticed. Also harry was the 8th horcrux, not the 7th

    • @joshuaward6480
      @joshuaward6480 6 років тому +51

      Actually there were 7 Horcruxes 8 parts of a soul get it right
      Diadem
      Nagini
      Diary
      Cup
      Locket
      Ring
      HARRY
      And the eighth part of the soul is in Voldemort

    • @paint1398
      @paint1398 6 років тому +4

      Anum Qazi ??

    • @karlottabohnet3079
      @karlottabohnet3079 6 років тому +8

      Anum Qazi Quirell wasnt a horkrux But The main Part of voldemorts Soul lives in his body for a while. So it is Kind of The same Part as The voldemort in The later books.
      Sorry for my only okay english... i am german

    • @leeshayshongwe5666
      @leeshayshongwe5666 6 років тому +6

      nope,they just shared bodies

    • @Awesomeferret10
      @Awesomeferret10 6 років тому +3

      No Harry was seventh let’s count cup,locket,diary,ring,snake,diadem,Harry those are the horcruxs but Voldemort was the eighth bit of soul so you could look at it like there were eight bits of soul but only seven horcrixs

  • @tillytheunicorn954
    @tillytheunicorn954 6 років тому +42

    Also did he call something “wizarding rubbish”

    • @konikonitrainerwill5969
      @konikonitrainerwill5969 5 років тому +1

      yeah, the part where snape said "What would i get if i added root of asphodel to an infusion of wormwood?" (i can't remember the whole asphodel part lol)

  • @malicahamilton
    @malicahamilton 6 років тому +1

    I could sit here and watch harry potter related videos all day

  • @anusuya27
    @anusuya27 5 років тому +8

    You really need to read the books
    You don’t know anything about the Harry Potter franchise
    For instance - I think The wand that Ron had was passed down from Charlie not Percy and second that Ron got a new wand when his father got decent amount of money and he bought Ron a new wand

    • @Chazzyfield
      @Chazzyfield 4 роки тому

      Not everyone is obligated to read the damn books. Shut the hell up about it.

  • @MamiPR10292011
    @MamiPR10292011 6 років тому +2

    Actually in the Prisoner of Azkaban Ron’s family won a trip to Egypt. He thought that Scrabbers got sick there when Peter Pettigrew was acting screwy. In that book Ron got a new wand during that summer.

  • @sonic_of_atlantis
    @sonic_of_atlantis 5 років тому +8

    What did the author of the harry potter series call the first book? oh that's right, THE PHILOSOPHER STONE!

  • @erevos217
    @erevos217 6 років тому +1

    i called it in book four that snape was in love with harry's mom. my friends laughed at me. the joy i felt when i rubbed it in their faces three books later was priceless.

  • @tarakmax3620
    @tarakmax3620 4 роки тому +3

    Dear (insert your name), you have been excepted into hogwarts school of witchcraft and wizardry. Your school materials are this: one wand, hogwarts robes, a cauldron, (grade 3 spell books: walking with werewolves by Linda schemer, hogwarts, a history by Alastair potland, and timeline of magic history by lee Ford) You will need some sets of clothes you will be staying for the whole year (unless you choose to go back home for the holidays of course) you will need a broomstick (any model of flying broomstick). Once you get here you will be sorted into your a house (which is basically the people you will be taking classes with) Gryffindor,Slytherin,hufflepuff, or ravenclaw. First years are not permitted to play quidditch games, but are allowed to go and watch. If you do anything that is against the rules you will lose points for your whole house ( the houses compete in a yearly house cup so the whole school will participate). Your classes will end at the end of the day ( 4:30) and you will sometime be able to go to your dormitory or common room in between classes. If you are muggle born (muggles are non-magic people) then you will go into your town and find an almost unnoticeable door that no one seems to see and go inside you will then see diagon ally and that is where you will buy your things. On November 9th you will go to any your ticket will be in the mail and you will go to a train station find platforms 9and10 and run strait into the wall and you will be teleported to platform 9 and three quarters, that is where you will find your train. You can invite 2 friends to hogwarts with you and they can learn at hogwarts as well! From, Minerva Mcgonagal, headmistress at hogwarts school of witchcraft and wizardry. Bye!

  • @lostcinema5189
    @lostcinema5189 4 роки тому +2

    Snape was not a good teacher but a awesome person!

  • @Quietman365
    @Quietman365 6 років тому +219

    PHILOSOPHER'S STONE!!!

    • @Imaginary_One
      @Imaginary_One 6 років тому +1

      Shut up. Americans can call it whatever we want

    • @Blade.5786
      @Blade.5786 6 років тому +1

      Nicholas Langley I shall call you "Nicholas Flamel" for absolutely no reason related to Harry Potter.By the way I'm not American.

    • @kartertodd2773
      @kartertodd2773 6 років тому +3

      It's different in some countries God do you people have nothing better to do with your lives than nit pick UA-cam videos

    • @ivy-ur2qq
      @ivy-ur2qq 6 років тому +2

      Karter Todd no we dont

    • @mbarrett1476
      @mbarrett1476 6 років тому +5

      Quietman365 yes, you can tell these people didn’t read the book (or they weren’t British )

  • @paulajean1809
    @paulajean1809 6 років тому +1

    You can see Susan Bones in The Goblet of Fire. She's in the audience when Harry Potter returns from the maze with Cedric Diggory's body. I can't remember if she was in any of the other films. However, I do remember seeing her there.

  • @eylonaharon6560
    @eylonaharon6560 6 років тому +36

    You are making a lot of Harry potter video's lately!

  • @bel1903
    @bel1903 6 років тому +1

    That chocolate frog yeeted itself off of that bus and honestly I relate

  • @yeldacetin5638
    @yeldacetin5638 5 років тому +9

    7 Weasley children
    7 years of education
    and much more (even though I cannot remember any more )

    • @crippling_depression907
      @crippling_depression907 5 років тому +1

      7 horcroxes 7 people have to die for tom to split his soul each time 7 locks on the door severus us 7 letters abd looks like the letter 7 who protects the 7th horcrux

    • @daaneersel8957
      @daaneersel8957 5 років тому +1

      7 challenges to get to the philpsophers stone.

    • @keandras8584
      @keandras8584 4 роки тому +2

      Yelda Cetin turn to page 394
      3+9+4= 16 > 1+6= 7
      😮

    • @lemonellaaaa8360
      @lemonellaaaa8360 4 роки тому

      7 muggles saw the car

  • @sorrowandsufferin924
    @sorrowandsufferin924 6 років тому +2

    Two things,
    1) The number 7 is generally considered one of the most powerful numbers (in the western world at least), e.g. the world's creation in 7 days, the seven dwarfs in Snowwhite, or the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
    Plus, with two dices, the number 7 has - statistically spoken - the highest frequency, being 1.2 times more likely than the 6 and the 8.
    There is even this so-called Blue-Seven-Phenomenon, that, when asked for a preferred number between 1 and 9 as well as for a preferred colour, most people apparently tend to answer "blue" and "7".
    And 2): Did I miss something or how does 62442 spell magic? F-B-D-D-B? | M-A-G-I-C: 13-1-7-9-3 => 131793
    It's the numbers of the letters in the alphabet. A=1, B=2, and so on. And "magic" equals 13 1 7 9 3

    • @michaelbenninghoven-sparks3060
      @michaelbenninghoven-sparks3060 6 років тому

      This guy may have gotten a lot wrong, but the numbers are right. They were playing off the fact Mr. Weasley was inputting these numbers on a phone. Back in the days of flip-phones with alphanumeric keypads, the numbers 6-2-4-4-2 would be used to type magic

  • @flawed1
    @flawed1 6 років тому +4

    I like how you acknowledge that if people don’t subscribe before they watch, they won’t do so at all 😂

    • @Awesomeferret10
      @Awesomeferret10 6 років тому +1

      I strongly dislike hate on UA-cam channels in my opinion why are you on the channel if you hate it but I was watching Harry Potter theories and I saw this come up I thought it would be a good way to test my potter knowledge but this video was trash they did no research they got so much wrong but a few things were right so I applaud them for amazing me with the whole wormtail plant thing that was something

  • @ricorofficial
    @ricorofficial 2 місяці тому

    The detail about seven weasley children also fits into the number seven as a theme in the books. Also the dissapearance of susan bones sounds like a really good crime documentary

  • @MarrisaPlays
    @MarrisaPlays 6 років тому +3

    ok so i never did notice Snapes hint in the first potions class. That is very interesting.

    • @crippling_depression907
      @crippling_depression907 5 років тому

      Very you would have to have googled it but they didnt have that then forshadowing at its finest

  • @drkshitijbasod4454
    @drkshitijbasod4454 6 років тому +1

    Wow... Thnx for sharing, the first Harry Snape Interaction... And also there are a lot of events in the movie where Snape saved him, the best one was in Umbridge's chamber

  • @iandruckman7779
    @iandruckman7779 6 років тому +8

    It was Bill's old wand, not Percy's.the password to access the Ministry had to be simple......It's the access to the visitor entrance to the Ministry. Its supposed to be widely known.

    • @carolinheinze8998
      @carolinheinze8998 6 років тому +1

      It was Charly's old wand, not Percy's and also not Bill's! He got Bill's old robes, Charly's old wand and Percy's old rat.

    • @advaitasinha6163
      @advaitasinha6163 5 років тому

      it was charlie's old wand

  • @jacobchristensen6235
    @jacobchristensen6235 4 роки тому +1

    As a 7 year old kid I never really hated Snape. He was never truly cruel - often I felt Harry Potter was a snotty kid and just keep growing that direction.

  • @JERBYTUBE
    @JERBYTUBE 6 років тому +43

    We hated Snape?
    I always loved him tbh

    • @mayterivas6174
      @mayterivas6174 6 років тому +2

      Same!

    • @hankidsss
      @hankidsss 5 років тому +1

      Same !!

    • @kittycas3652
      @kittycas3652 5 років тому +1

      ME TOO!!

    • @sam-lt3qr
      @sam-lt3qr 5 років тому +1

      Always-

    • @ryanschiano7206
      @ryanschiano7206 5 років тому +1

      I actually still hate him, even with his "redemption." He's a cruel bully who does end up being on the right side of the fight, but for purely selfish reasons. And he's still a complete jerk to a young child whose only crime is being the orphaned son of a man Snape didn't like. Wow, what a hero.

  • @philiplanzino8761
    @philiplanzino8761 6 років тому +1

    something i've noticed that i haven't heard mentioned is that at his party, slughorn is confused about the what a dentist is and does. but, in the second movie, the weasley's clock has dentist as a location.

  • @agrimbhalla
    @agrimbhalla 6 років тому +27

    The chocolate frog could've been someone else's

    • @yaeleah0722
      @yaeleah0722 5 років тому +1

      Well we like to think that it was Harry's it makes the ending much cuter (and sadder for me)

  • @robloxblacktop2071
    @robloxblacktop2071 4 роки тому +2

    Screen Rant: Shows deathly hallows symbol
    Me: BILL CIPHER

  • @neomp5
    @neomp5 6 років тому +76

    that thing doesn't look like the deathly hallows symbol at all

    • @kinghaileyadatway4204
      @kinghaileyadatway4204 6 років тому

      neomp5 can u sub to me i will to u

    • @ahsoka_tano_98
      @ahsoka_tano_98 6 років тому +4

      neomp5 with some imagination it does, but I doubt Rowling actually planted it there...

    • @neomp5
      @neomp5 6 років тому +5

      at best there's a passing resemblance. but enough differences to make it clear it wasn't intended to be the deathly hallows symbol

    • @matthewmcfadden4178
      @matthewmcfadden4178 6 років тому +7

      Shouldn't the symbol just be the wand and stone (the cloaks invisible 😃.)

    • @fluttershymlp3602
      @fluttershymlp3602 6 років тому +1

      Chinex Evolution yes

  • @zoeymarie5537
    @zoeymarie5537 5 років тому +1

    1:08 dude I went to a flea market and was drawn to that necklace (I’ve never watched Harry Potter movies but read the books) and now I’m geeking over the fact I have the same necklace.

  • @Fayanora
    @Fayanora 6 років тому +5

    In the books, Ron got a new wand when his old one broke.

    • @janedoex8345
      @janedoex8345 6 років тому

      A new "wand" ? That's the German word for "wall"....didn't know he chose to be a bricklayer as his second career...

  • @aurvaroy6670
    @aurvaroy6670 4 роки тому

    That 3 headed dog already gets me every time I watch this video 😱

  • @zarennaangel1198
    @zarennaangel1198 6 років тому +90

    Ron's wand before belonged to Bill not Percy. You got it wrong.

    • @chibikitchan
      @chibikitchan 6 років тому +33

      while it is wrong that it's not Percy's wand. The wand is also not Bill's. Ron got Bill's old robes, Charlie's old wand, and Percy's old rat.

    • @nicholascartagena349
      @nicholascartagena349 6 років тому +4

      It was not Percys wand but it was actully Charlies remember Ron said "I have Bills old wand Charlies old wand and Percy's old rat

    • @yaeleah0722
      @yaeleah0722 5 років тому

      It was Percy's wand

    • @sophiavincent7785
      @sophiavincent7785 5 років тому +1

      CHARILE

    • @pokehunter7499
      @pokehunter7499 5 років тому

      CHARLIE

  • @YashamaruSensei
    @YashamaruSensei 6 років тому +2

    Ron got his own wand after that one broke in part 2, and from there he got better at magic,
    same happened with Neville, who used his fathers wand, but broke it in the battle of the department of mysteries

  • @fancorn2898
    @fancorn2898 6 років тому +11

    Did J.K.Rowling actually mean to mention Lily when Snape talked to Harry?

    • @jakebatch874
      @jakebatch874 6 років тому +2

      Fancorn yes, it's on pottermore. It's from the Victorian language of the flowers. You can look it up

    • @yaeleah0722
      @yaeleah0722 5 років тому

      Yes

  • @jakobvu5223
    @jakobvu5223 4 роки тому +1

    The room behind Dumbledores desk and chair is used when Harry talks to Dumbledore in the last part of the order of the Phoenix

  • @smalltownfilms
    @smalltownfilms 6 років тому +10

    Chocolate Frog Would actually be 26 years old

    • @endyender1703
      @endyender1703 6 років тому +1

      Well, it's magical... so I doubt it would have died nor spoiled...

    • @smalltownfilms
      @smalltownfilms 6 років тому +1

      Endy Ender EXACTLY. that's an old ass piece of candy though lol

    • @sorrowandsufferin924
      @sorrowandsufferin924 6 років тому +1

      Chocolate doesn't get bad, so why not? As long as the animation spell holds...

    • @janedoex8345
      @janedoex8345 6 років тому

      The frog was so adorable. I mean it's a cute frog AND chocolate... He 'd get a bit whiteish over time though....^^ Must be actually great to breed these chocolate frogs. Tiny froglings everywhere and always enough snacks in the house, whenever friends came over...but petting them would be risky...maybe cross them with M&M's.....

  • @brooklynngrace7177
    @brooklynngrace7177 4 роки тому +1

    The deatheaters weren’t dead. Snape aimed the spells and before he left he took their wands it shows it

  • @rileydevan9626
    @rileydevan9626 6 років тому +3

    Maybe if you read the books, youd know that Rons parents bought him a wand after they went to Egypt with the money they won from the Ministry

    • @hankidsss
      @hankidsss 5 років тому

      Riley Devan how did they win money from the ministry?

  • @mdsajedi3471
    @mdsajedi3471 5 років тому

    MERLIN'S BEARD, THE SNAPE ONE WAS AWSOME

  • @lazymj8284
    @lazymj8284 4 роки тому +3

    There needs to be a massive Harry Potter game made. Right now

  • @mightyb8679
    @mightyb8679 6 років тому +2

    7 Weasley children...Charlie, Bill, Percy, Fred, George, Ron, & Ginny

  • @gopakumaradvocate1408
    @gopakumaradvocate1408 4 роки тому +3

    Of course .....
    SNAPE potion class

  • @Ranger1812
    @Ranger1812 6 років тому +1

    Voldemort wanted 6 Horcruxes to give him a 7-part soul - 6 Horcruxes, plus the "Master Soul" still in his body.
    Harry didn't make himself number 7, there are 7 players on a team.
    The frog isn't the same one...

  • @JohnWick-pu1zu
    @JohnWick-pu1zu 6 років тому +17

    not sorcerer it's philosopher's stone

    • @kenhollis6197
      @kenhollis6197 6 років тому +7

      SamE 21666 It was called Sorcerer's Stone in the US, and this channel is American. Get over it and yourself.

    • @emilyallen3533
      @emilyallen3533 6 років тому +1

      Its called both

    • @marc12851
      @marc12851 6 років тому +1

      We could go on for a while on this subject. Depending on the country, the title was changed (adapted ?). For example, if I were to translate the title of the first book from french into english, it would be the following : Harry Potter at the School of Wizardry. Most of us will agree on the lameness of it (even if I'm French), but we didn't choose it, publishers did, let's blame them and not the readers (even if I must agree that some, as rare as they can be, subtleties were lost during the translation into american english)

    • @Lauren-vf4ft
      @Lauren-vf4ft 6 років тому

      Potato SPUD Sorcerer is US

    • @novehmber
      @novehmber 6 років тому

      Marc Antoine Froger Totally agree with this. There are people having literal UK vs US arguments in the comments over a BOOK title. The stone has two different names for two different cultures so it’s easier to interpret and find meaning behind. I don’t see how that’s a problem when it doesn’t change the structure or importance of anything else in the books

  • @eshkhan8625
    @eshkhan8625 5 років тому +1

    Harry book 1: Who is that man?
    Book 7: The bravest man I knew

  • @nellbug
    @nellbug 6 років тому +5

    Philosopher’s stone

  • @OriginalTolerableHusky
    @OriginalTolerableHusky 6 років тому

    Locharts baldness was also revealed in the LEGO game, when the pixies were trying to take off his wig in the Defense Against the Dark Arts classroom

  • @kuki259
    @kuki259 6 років тому +5

    In the book Snape didn't save Harry and the others of Lupin as he was a werewolf because he was unconscious all the time

  • @SimonaShine
    @SimonaShine 6 років тому

    The part with the asphodel infusion was waaayyy too cool,I had no idea!

  • @elibeachill
    @elibeachill 6 років тому +19

    It's The PHILOSOPHERS Stone

    • @kendra7460
      @kendra7460 6 років тому +1

      in the U.S it is the sorcerers stone. This is an American channel too so..

    • @carolineeasleywilliams6110
      @carolineeasleywilliams6110 6 років тому

      TheGecko 1212 in the US it’s sorcerers and idk where it is called Philosophers Stone but he’s a US citizen

    • @elibeachill
      @elibeachill 6 років тому

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Philosopher%27s_Stone

    • @tvaholicsquidney
      @tvaholicsquidney 6 років тому

      in the us it is called the sorcerer's stone for the first harry potter book, here in the uk it is called the philospher's stone, as each country will understand a different term, we understand philosopher and us citizens understand sorcerer, same with a lot of terms that are different for the 2 countries

    • @keandras8584
      @keandras8584 4 роки тому

      Eli 'Gecko' Beachill British boi

  • @istabraqabidi6060
    @istabraqabidi6060 5 років тому +2

    It would be amazing if there was a prequel on Lilly james Snape and Sirius life

  • @justinluong1680
    @justinluong1680 6 років тому +3

    The snape thing was jawdropping!

  • @GajendraSingh-sb7id
    @GajendraSingh-sb7id 5 років тому

    I have watched several times Harry potter's movies and read books but still there lies something unnoticed and then I like to watch it again. It is infinitely interesting.

  • @lawsonvaughan2278
    @lawsonvaughan2278 6 років тому +17

    Literally everyone knows all of these

    • @Ferrante69
      @Ferrante69 6 років тому

      Nope

    • @yaeleah0722
      @yaeleah0722 5 років тому +2

      Ikr if your a potterhead you knew all of these and MORE

  • @bubblymakamae3839
    @bubblymakamae3839 4 роки тому

    I liked Snape and Susan bones. I was surprised at the Hallows symbol. The wig was funny.

  • @razzi0718
    @razzi0718 6 років тому +7

    Real fans know these things

  • @kalaendhil-stevenot6938
    @kalaendhil-stevenot6938 5 років тому +1

    If you read the books it says that Ron gets a new wand in the prisoner of azkaban

  • @darkwingduck47
    @darkwingduck47 5 років тому +3

    Snape not just killed the 2 DeathEaters, but also took their wands before escaping through the window ;)

  • @astronorms
    @astronorms 4 роки тому

    “If he (Ron) got a new wand or not,we don’t know.”
    Nobody :
    Me : BuT ItS MeNtioNeD iN thE BooKs-