Marriage Adultery & Divorce, Watch kapil Sibbal argue in Supreme Court of India

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 467

  • @simplespace8981
    @simplespace8981 2 роки тому +339

    Our generation of law students are very lucky to watch Supreme Court hearing in home hats off to the court👏🫡

    • @LawChakra
      @LawChakra  2 роки тому +9

      Indeed they are

    • @SilenceSerene
      @SilenceSerene 2 роки тому +12

      But the nepotism in litigation is a major deterrent in motivation to argue in the courts

    • @offred6013
      @offred6013 2 роки тому

      Our generation is stupid. We can see that the courts have been hogged up by legacy lawyers( from 2nd gen and onwards ) . Who becomes a judge is like a business secret .
      And bar council is only interested in taking exams and money from young law gradguates and in imposing stupid rules and regulation on young lawyers so as to dissuade them from entering this profession so that legacy wallas can continue to consolidate.

    • @scientificatheist9381
      @scientificatheist9381 2 роки тому

      @@SilenceSerene anyone who inherit wealth indulge in nepotism.

    • @28thjan
      @28thjan 2 роки тому +8

      @@LawChakra Judges are laughing when Kapil is pitching the case. Supreme court is not serious at all.

  • @biganna99
    @biganna99 2 роки тому +213

    Getting out of a broken marriage , without any possibilty of re-union, should be made easier and quicker.
    The family courts should be in no business, beyond a session of counseling, to say no to the divorce.

    • @HappyHighFives
      @HappyHighFives 2 роки тому +41

      But many are interested in 'Business' of Alimony

    • @vivekh243
      @vivekh243 2 роки тому +11

      Only few understand the divorce industry who are suffering in it. Rest use it for business needs including lawyers, judges, agencies...

    • @Kadinamara
      @Kadinamara 2 роки тому +1

      @@vivekh243 but that's how the world is

    • @rajkishore7864
      @rajkishore7864 2 роки тому

      Right

    • @arvindraman2200
      @arvindraman2200 2 роки тому +6

      Many forget the child in the equation. His interests cannot only be quantified in monetary terms.

  • @shankgamer418
    @shankgamer418 2 роки тому +96

    Although i am not a fan of Kapil Sibbal, as a politician. But he is a very knowledgeable advocate and i really liked his arguments. The confidence with which he argumented is excellent, very precise, crisp and clear in his message delivery.

    • @HamariKahani638
      @HamariKahani638 2 роки тому +30

      You are fan of modi ji.. I know...... Andhbhakt 😂

    • @pratham665
      @pratham665 2 роки тому +5

      @Never Support Criminals badi baat yeh hai ki vo designated senior advocate hai
      Koi affidavit bane wala advocate nhi

    • @shinylucky5139
      @shinylucky5139 2 роки тому

      @@HamariKahani638 and who you are chamcha or dayen mamata begam ki thuk chatn vali🤣🤣🤣🤣yaa aand khujane vali🤣🤣

    • @abhishekbhattacharjee6584
      @abhishekbhattacharjee6584 2 роки тому

      @@HamariKahani638 not a Gandhi ka chamcha like u. Atleast he's a bhakt. Not a slave.

    • @jarp5581
      @jarp5581 2 роки тому +1

      You are andhmamazi do you even know what left has done to hindus
      There's no control over temples all looted by politicians
      WAQF act
      Places of Worship act
      I am ready to take up arms against this today 🔥🔱🚩🔥

  • @surrao2732
    @surrao2732 2 роки тому +72

    1. When two litigants want a divorce.
    No court should interfere.
    2. When they contest, the delay is bacause of entitlement, money & custody.
    3. Advocates add to the pain besides the lengthy procedure.

    • @jayantgill288
      @jayantgill288 2 роки тому +10

      1. When 2 litigants want divorce it's mutual consent divorce where all maintenance issues are consented between both the parties., this ends within 6 months max.
      2. Problem happens when one party doesn't want a divorce unless their demand of maintenance, alimony and child custody is fulfilled.

    • @surrao2732
      @surrao2732 2 роки тому +1

      @@jayantgill2881. That is what Kapilji is arguing. Seperate the divorce from maintenance/money, to shorten the litigation time. No?

    • @jayantgill288
      @jayantgill288 2 роки тому +4

      @@surrao2732 coz you said - when two litigants want divorce. This refers to mutual consent divorce which ends in 6 months.

    • @rajendrabareto8065
      @rajendrabareto8065 2 роки тому +5

      Advocate also want money. Many women divorce for conpensatuon putting false accuses.

    • @biganna99
      @biganna99 2 роки тому

      @@surrao2732 agreeable argument. Once the divorce is made easy & quick, the other two aspects of the dispute will also not take years to resolve. Children of divorced parents is a social responsibilty as well, so there should be some social security programme & law for such children upto an age of their attaining adulthood.

  • @151centrum
    @151centrum 2 роки тому +46

    Mr Sibal’s reasons, logic & arguments are excellent - I wish the judges in Indian courts used the same logic in deciding their cases. God bless you Mr Sibal.

  • @Anilkumar-hf1eo
    @Anilkumar-hf1eo 2 роки тому +135

    The most failed part of Indian Judiciary is law equal irrespective of gender. But when it comes to divorce most of cases maintenance and child custody award to women and not vice versa... The failed law

    • @sammynochains3455
      @sammynochains3455 2 роки тому +12

      Exactly, family courts are so anti-men that the horror stories wont let you sleep @night

    • @captainjack5846
      @captainjack5846 2 роки тому +3

      When we talk about empowered women and it is 21st century. There must not be any concept of maintenance. Husaband is not a master so wife is also not depended on him.

  • @RajatSharma-tn6gf
    @RajatSharma-tn6gf 2 роки тому +63

    i totally agree ...if relation is completely sour no point to drag it...make divorce easy as most of the time it is extortion tool

    • @Good2BGood76
      @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому

      better if you put illegal extortion showing children in court like a bowl it is an attack on humanity and on children.

    • @pearldavis1220
      @pearldavis1220 2 роки тому

      How can a lawyer survive.....we need sufficient courts and judges. The ruling parties are not taking care of the people. The government is mum....SC is available for rich ... poorest will suffer..

  • @indianmen4694
    @indianmen4694 2 роки тому +36

    In india married men are suffering from cases from years upto 30 yrs loosing all productive years in court corridors

    • @ezhuthalan3625
      @ezhuthalan3625 10 місяців тому

      Because in India women are suffering from marriage itself for ages. Nobody bothers about it.

  • @rahuld943
    @rahuld943 2 роки тому +80

    when courts don't interfere when marriage is happening, why courts interfere in divorce??? .. let them also then interfere in marriage , ask people to take permission of court to get married..

    • @Nidhieeee
      @Nidhieeee 2 роки тому +3

      good point

    • @harshitkumar8523
      @harshitkumar8523 2 роки тому +1

      What about the fundamental rights of an individual??

    • @Nidhieeee
      @Nidhieeee 2 роки тому +23

      @@harshitkumar8523 ask this question to your wife , and tell her to file cases against you, then you will understand the fundamental rights of an individual specially the fundamental rights of Men.

    • @archanaarora2090
      @archanaarora2090 2 роки тому +2

      Then it will be called live in relationship not marriage....

    • @Nidhieeee
      @Nidhieeee 2 роки тому +22

      @@archanaarora2090 madam gaur se dekhiye. aajkal marriage livein relationship hi ho gye hain. business ban gyi hai shadi. shadi karo fir husband aur puri family pr juthe cases karo, maje se paise le kar mayke me aish karo

  • @kunaljadav633
    @kunaljadav633 2 роки тому +30

    In divorce cases, only Lawyers and Judges are benefiting. Both parties have to lose financially, emotionally, physically, and socially. The child is the main victim of the system. The arrogance of the Judges is clearly visible in this video. They require almost sincerity. Even the need to seat 5 judges and so many lawyers is a clear sign of what is wrong in the system. It's very pathetic & disheartening.

    • @parveshbisht4955
      @parveshbisht4955 Рік тому

      It's mostly men who suffer. Courts take side of women in most cases

  • @vinaychakraborty8635
    @vinaychakraborty8635 2 роки тому +36

    Why only divorce cases, all cases should be disposed off in a reasonable time. Ideally a civil matter should be resolved in less than 6 months and criminal cases within a year. Delaying Justice beyond a reasonable period of time is outright denial of justice.

    • @karthikvavilala8154
      @karthikvavilala8154 2 роки тому +2

      Divorce is very important matter

    • @prabhakarj931
      @prabhakarj931 2 роки тому +1

      There is an important aspect called evidence to support one's argument. And there is a right and responsibility of the other side to critically examine and raise issues. Some cases are simple and straightforward . Some are complex. You cannot impose a sweeping time limit on all cases.

    • @deepconscious7741
      @deepconscious7741 2 роки тому

      There needs to be a 200% increase in the number of judges and courts to provide a quicker adjudication of cases. Justice delayed is Justice denied is the norm in this country. And the saddest thing- now the people have understood it to be a normal thing.

    • @Star-546
      @Star-546 2 роки тому

      @@deepconscious7741 do it why not doing , why people has to suffer for this idotic justice system

    • @deepconscious7741
      @deepconscious7741 2 роки тому

      @@Star-546 Yes, it should be done. The Law Ministry is fully aware of the situation. But they are not doing anything. The Central Government has to take the initiative, to make the infrastructure -Court Buildings, support structures, etc., appointment of judges comes later.
      But Central Government is not doing.

  • @PYRAMIDHEAD1051
    @PYRAMIDHEAD1051 2 роки тому +13

    Marriage is a very unfavorable contract under current circumstances in India..... especially for men. It's like boarding a sinking ship. The smart way to save one's life in a marriage is prenup before a marriage.

    • @amiyarana8733
      @amiyarana8733 2 роки тому

      There is no prenup agreement in India. And no one tells husband to pay handsome alimony if his wife is at fault.

    • @pradumkumar7464
      @pradumkumar7464 Рік тому +1

      ​@@amiyarana8733where u live...a husband has to always pay a hefty amount.. exception infidelity

    • @ezhuthalan3625
      @ezhuthalan3625 10 місяців тому +1

      Marriage is a very unfavorable contract for ages for women. They are living in a sinking ship life long in the grip of man and his family. Man's family dictates what, when she has to eat,dress, reproduce and to afford her career or not. Men are expecting their partner should co-operate to persue their career. But many men don't co-operate with their partner. If women earns also many men expect her to do all house hold chores,child care,old people care.

    • @vikasv4054
      @vikasv4054 3 місяці тому

      ​@@pradumkumar7464even in case of infidelity, men has to pay alimony.. always men are the sufferers in divorce issue

  • @janardanaraopaturi509
    @janardanaraopaturi509 2 роки тому +20

    In all family court cases and 498A and DVC cases, it must me made mandatory that the wife as complainant or petitioner must attend all adjournments equally with the husband (gender quality before law). This is one way to avoid false cases! If proved false, the losing party must pay penalty to the other party. All such family related cases strictly must be completed within 6 months maximum! All these measurements will save indian family structure equally in all directions!

    • @biganna99
      @biganna99 2 роки тому +3

      Good point. Matrimonial disputes fester when the wife falsely files a criminal case under 498A. But this case becomes worthless when the husband & his relatives secure bail. The family courts, in subsequent divorce case, ensures compounding of 498A as quashing the FIR, but at the same time supports the wife to get handsome alimony. In such a case, fighting the cases separately is the better option that remains available to the husband. That is why, matters of divorce should be run independently & for quicker results. Rest of the cases unnecessarily clubbed to divorce can be dealt with separately.. Therefore. Mr.Sibbal has raised a right concern. Let's hope the SC contemplates on it and issues certian direction to the subordinate courts.

    • @amiyarana8733
      @amiyarana8733 2 роки тому +1

      @@biganna99monthly maintenance is ok but lump sum alimony is like nightmare to those husbands. Wife always makes unreasonable demands like 50 lakhs, 1 crore. It is just not fair. My question is does court grant this huge alimony to wife? Can these amounts be reduced?

    • @Sol-ps8ox
      @Sol-ps8ox 2 роки тому +1

      @@amiyarana8733 Even monthly allowance should not be given if wife is the one asking for divorce or if she has cheated the husband in any way.

  • @sk5174
    @sk5174 2 роки тому +14

    If there is no reconciliation between couple.. Divorce should be given fast... So that both can live happily

  • @warriorx86
    @warriorx86 2 роки тому +36

    Recently I saw on UA-cam HC judge trying to convince a man who has multiple false cases on him by wife to try to reconcile with wife even after separation of 14 yrs. Judiciary has to come out from this mindset to save marriage at all cost. Most of the times it better to come out of marriage than to live in toxic one for rest of life.

    • @Good2BGood76
      @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому +3

      when you loose a part of cake for 14 yrs then how one can relay on the partners where they quenched their thrust over the period. if they get reconciliation it will only for money and property only.

    • @sidstar593
      @sidstar593 2 роки тому

      @pardeep kumar I wanna know what kinds cases bro, your brother about those cases, have you briefed about it?

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому +2

      @pardeep kumar
      Men should have commission to get saved by law and this alimony should get stopped in this educated world
      Moreover men should smartly take vidoes of wife behavior which is the only solution to save ourselves

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому

      @pardeep kumar
      You need to continuously do it and take revenge somehow
      The law is completely biased for women which is not acceptable

    • @parveshbisht4955
      @parveshbisht4955 Рік тому

      And that to only for men not women. If a women want divorce, court grant them divorce but not for men

  • @badridas9498
    @badridas9498 2 роки тому +71

    Personal biases, prejudices, experiences play an important role, its never just LAW. LAW is less than 5 percent. Wish there was machines sitting there making decisions.

    • @jacobbrown-gr3es
      @jacobbrown-gr3es 2 роки тому +7

      Exactly 😫😥😥😥wish it was just law

    • @sarvesh704
      @sarvesh704 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly. That is why different judges give different judgements with same law in front of them.

    • @kavishwarmokal124
      @kavishwarmokal124 2 роки тому +5

      @@sarvesh704 absolutely right .. 👍👍, that's the major hypocrisy of Indian laws.

    • @immigrationcanada1802
      @immigrationcanada1802 2 роки тому +3

      @@kavishwarmokal124 Stupid, that happens globally. Difference happens over interpretation of law because law and constitution are not expressed in form of mathematical formulas for them to be absolute

    • @kavishwarmokal124
      @kavishwarmokal124 2 роки тому +1

      @@immigrationcanada1802 law should not be supple and should be straight to the point. There shouldn't be place for loopholes to be created by vague draft of the laws.

  • @ToThoseWhoVanished
    @ToThoseWhoVanished 2 роки тому +6

    He is no doubt a great lawyer, he has expressed honestly that Indian snail's pace litigation goes on until people loose their lives!!

  • @vanabhilash
    @vanabhilash 2 роки тому +8

    Science student but love to see the process of articulated arguing with civility, the qualitative emphasis with which it's practised, and the reasonably needful and polite contention in response by the court-- almost like an honest strawmanning showdown. If only this is how people would scrutinise their internal dialogues/opinions too, would they become highly informed and surgical in their dispositions.

  • @ayushabhani7208
    @ayushabhani7208 2 роки тому +38

    If Live streaming was done earlier, we will able to see legend RAM JETHMALANI arguing on court.

  • @omprakashsharma-iv2hq
    @omprakashsharma-iv2hq 2 роки тому +13

    What mr. Kapil Sibal says is perfectly fine. the threshold of proof should be low also the procedure should be extremely simple rather than complex. a day should be given to couple of couples, wherein bringing all relevant witness is job of parties and matter be ended on that day itself. trials are running foreveerrrrrrr........ segregate-- contesting - not contesting.. give sufficient time, rock solid notice, if either party claims the other one is avoiding notice, then notice at first instance could be issued through public portal. law for service of notice through SMS -tracked by Aadhar card, voter id car etc automatically without any person's involvement and disclosure of address details. this 1800 age laws need changes.

  • @Rappermaddy
    @Rappermaddy 2 роки тому +4

    What a great arguement and what level of research . Impeccable . Music to ears and so informative

  • @exploring2351
    @exploring2351 2 роки тому +4

    In case of adultery, alimony prima facie must be waived , men is responsible for earning or livelihood is worst thinking.

  • @get2dude2000
    @get2dude2000 2 роки тому +8

    When CJI pointed out more courts and judges to reduce the number of cases, Modi said, put camera in courts🤘. Started pilot with Gujarat HC and hope tareekh pe tareekh culture will change and we will manage cases more efficiently....

  • @USMANKHAN-sx5cx
    @USMANKHAN-sx5cx 2 роки тому +21

    Now all will get to know the difference between Bollywood court and the real one🙂

    • @Star-546
      @Star-546 2 роки тому +2

      Bycott Bollywood

  • @randomguy-26
    @randomguy-26 Рік тому +1

    In a marriage, a wife has zero legal responsibilities or obligations to her husband, while the husband becomes a slave forced to work and pay for her even if he literally becomes a cripple, even if she offers nothing in their marriage.

  • @sidlawyer
    @sidlawyer 2 роки тому +23

    I am a lawyer with Delhi High court and about to be licensed in Ontario, Canada.
    In Canada, divorce is a human right.
    The issues of maintenance and child custody are dealt later.

    • @Movingacharya
      @Movingacharya 2 роки тому

      Great

    • @user-gz5ss4ff4l
      @user-gz5ss4ff4l 2 роки тому +6

      A friend of mine, an NRI settled in Canada, was saying that even in Canadian laws mostly favour women, and majority of the time the lady gets half of her husband's property in cases of matrimonial disputes.
      Is this true?

    • @egonemo6805
      @egonemo6805 2 роки тому +1

      I hope your English improves!

    • @sidlawyer
      @sidlawyer 2 роки тому +4

      @@user-gz5ss4ff4l your friend is absolutely right. But there are ways to protect property there like making trusts etc.
      Those are not available in India.

    • @anandmotors3459
      @anandmotors3459 2 роки тому

      Hlo sir can u pljj guide how to become lawyer in Canada if u are enrolled in delhi

  • @rajendrabareto8065
    @rajendrabareto8065 2 роки тому +4

    Today Man and Women earns equally. Why have custody with mother only? Why give compensation for wife for adultery. Is sex not enjoyed by both after marriage? Or what for compensation is given? Why even maintenance when wife falsely accuses the husband.

    • @kavishwarmokal124
      @kavishwarmokal124 2 роки тому +3

      It's due to corrupt mentality of judiciary.

    • @aruntripathi2525
      @aruntripathi2525 2 роки тому

      न्यायप्रणाली पर कोई टिप्पणी निरर्थक है।भारत मे न्यायिक व्यवस्था की शुरुआत पुलिस से होती है ।आलोचना करने पर परिणाम की कल्पना कीजिए।न्यायालय मे पहुंचने पर तो यह सोचने को मजबूर होना पडता है कि भगवान नेअन्तहीन यातना सहने के लिये जंम दिया था।जंगल राज से भी बदतर व्यवस्था

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому

      Men should have commission to get saved by law
      Alimony should get stopped in this educated world and women can go job
      Child should given equally to both father and mother equally
      Moreover men should smartly take vidoes of wife behavior which is the only solution to save ourselves

  • @rajsaindhav
    @rajsaindhav 2 роки тому +2

    Extremely wise suggestion made by Mr Sibbal. Its easier to grant divorce if the Trial Court has to draw a conclusion that after hearing both parties, it does not appear that they can live together happily.

  • @torankumarsingh8906
    @torankumarsingh8906 2 роки тому +3

    सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अडल्ट्री, और MTP एक्ट के सुनवाई में विवाह जैसे पवित्र बंधन को दरकिनार करते हुए मौलिक अधिकार के आर्टिकल 14 को मुख्य आधार माना
    फिर तलाक और पत्नी के भरण पोषण जैसे मामलों में मौलिक अधिकारों को आधार क्यों नहीं माना जा सकता?

  • @sarvesh704
    @sarvesh704 2 роки тому +8

    An issue which will affect common Indians is being discussed in a language, most Indians don't understand.

    • @ashutosh_shukla.
      @ashutosh_shukla. 2 роки тому

      Wrong. Its discussed exactly in the language which majority of Indians will understand. Not everyone speaks hindi, tamil, etc.

  • @Ameersha200
    @Ameersha200 2 роки тому +3

    Excellent argument by Mr. Kapil Sibal👍

  • @Nandu6321
    @Nandu6321 2 роки тому +7

    India will become next Japan , people won’t get married due to such laws !
    To be frank , staying single leads to happy & peaceful life !

  • @raghupath
    @raghupath 2 роки тому +1

    See how honourable Kapil Sibalji making his argument where you can understand each and very word. I have seen some law sites where the advocate is not able to make the court understand what he wants.

  • @vishaltehere6045
    @vishaltehere6045 2 роки тому +4

    Divorce ,Maintenance and custody should b entertain separately to resolve family disputes quickly...

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому

      Men should have commission to get saved by law
      Alimony should get stopped in this educated world and women can go job
      Child should given equally to both father and mother equally
      Moreover men should smartly take vidoes of wife behavior which is the only solution to save ourselves

  • @raajj5
    @raajj5 2 роки тому +4

    Kapil ji absolutely correct, but the judges don't know what losing a life is if he or she gets stuck years In litigation and can't get a divorce

  • @abhimanyusingh6761
    @abhimanyusingh6761 2 роки тому +4

    These judges are also so polite with young first generation lawyers..??

  • @rajendrabareto8065
    @rajendrabareto8065 2 роки тому +3

    Person who did not cross the age of 50 or about to be 50 will not accept the best part of life is 35 to 50.

  • @CreativeTechie101
    @CreativeTechie101 2 роки тому +3

    1ST TIME KAPIL SIBAL TALKING LOT of SENSE BUT THE SC WILL NOT LET THE GOOD THING HAPPEN !!!!! Unfortunate

  • @anilauece
    @anilauece Рік тому

    Divorce cases should be cleared within 2 years. Both families are suffering mentally in this process.

  • @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz
    @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz 2 роки тому +3

    Shadi ke time, alimony case, dowry case, violence case ka risk batana chahiye ladko ko.

  • @Regenerate100
    @Regenerate100 2 роки тому +1

    Dushyant Dave,Kapil Sibal are among some of the best lawyers & law students are lucky to see these proceedings..!

  • @sk5174
    @sk5174 2 роки тому +5

    Don't drag the issue of divorce long... Make it easier... Times are changing... Women and men are equal in today's society...

    • @Drprashantsagar
      @Drprashantsagar 2 роки тому +4

      No men's are suffering more now days by feminism

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому +2

      @@Drprashantsagar
      True
      Men should have commission to get saved by law
      Alimony should get stopped in this educated world and women can go job
      Child should given equally to both father and mother equally
      Moreover men should smartly take vidoes of wife behavior which is the only solution to save ourselves

  • @Shoaibalikhan19
    @Shoaibalikhan19 2 роки тому +1

    It’s good idea that’s every big issues of our country should be live telecast

  • @vijaymeduri8137
    @vijaymeduri8137 2 роки тому +3

    Good argument . 🙏

  • @YT-pm2sc
    @YT-pm2sc 2 роки тому +14

    Why aren't the judges appointed by an independent body?

    • @SaiN9860
      @SaiN9860 2 роки тому +6

      No person is independent in this world everyone has motive/ideology/needs etc

    • @YT-pm2sc
      @YT-pm2sc 2 роки тому +3

      @@SaiN9860 still doesn't answer the question.

    • @deepeshsingh7357
      @deepeshsingh7357 2 роки тому

      Kindly answer who will appoint the members of that independent body?

    • @YT-pm2sc
      @YT-pm2sc 2 роки тому

      @@deepeshsingh7357 not the members of the judiciary

    • @deepeshsingh7357
      @deepeshsingh7357 2 роки тому

      Than executive or legislature or we can constitute an independent body to appoint the members of independent body.

  • @subirbanerjee1487
    @subirbanerjee1487 2 роки тому +3

    This shows how they waste time there on useless discussions on social, rather than legal, issues which have long been settled. Even a school-going child knows how delay in dispensation of justice has made the judiciary useless. Now they are wasting time further, making comments on impact of delay on estranged couples! … The key lies in talking less and doing more.

  • @karthikpaniyoor5348
    @karthikpaniyoor5348 2 роки тому +37

    Isse accha shaadi hi na karo...mazak ban hai shadi ka..😔

    • @abhishek8195
      @abhishek8195 2 роки тому

      Majaak nahi dhandha,3-4 baar shaadi kaa naatak karke karodpati banati hain bhogodi dulhane

  • @MayaDevi-om4nw
    @MayaDevi-om4nw 2 роки тому +11

    This can save a lot of lifes

  • @mohd.khalidmunssori8143
    @mohd.khalidmunssori8143 2 роки тому +7

    I fully support to Kapil sibal, marriage is matter of choice between two but devorce isn't why husband and wife are fully depend on court , this makes life hell.

    • @mayurghatkar3894
      @mayurghatkar3894 2 роки тому

      Bhai tumhari aurato ko kam Se kam khuda ka to khauf dikhao wo bhi hamare aurato ki tarah karne lagi ab jhute cases

    • @mohd.khalidmunssori8143
      @mohd.khalidmunssori8143 2 роки тому

      @@mayurghatkar3894 Bhai bjp government me aurto ko kahuf khatam 😊

    • @mehmed1883
      @mehmed1883 2 роки тому

      @@mayurghatkar3894 agree bhai

  • @GgoutamGG
    @GgoutamGG 2 роки тому +15

    Mr.Sibbal has a perfect point to make .

    • @spiritualyogiyogi6137
      @spiritualyogiyogi6137 2 роки тому +1

      NO.
      Kapil Sibal IS NOT GOOD with his ideas and concepts. Here couple needs some time. Why hurry when most cases are not understood clearly. Clarity is most important than judgment.
      1. IN INDIA MARRIAGE IS NOT A SOCIAL CONTRACTS.
      MARRIAGE IS MERGER OF 2 FAMILY WHERE AS MARRIAGE IS NOT MERGER OF 2 PERSONS AS IN WESTERN NATIONS CULTURE.
      2, He brings from Knowledge n Wisdom from western culture n nature n Ethos of western ideas 💡. Most of the western ideas are worst with human nature and human beings culture.
      They give more importance than the money, financial dealings, materialistic mindset which india and Indians won't follow these worst western ideas.
      3. He took example of 1974 English court. Why we need to take every ideas or culture as a COPYCAT of western ideas. 🤔
      4. The parents or couple need to give some time to realize the reality of life.
      He clearly took experience more from western nations. This is not at all good..
      SUMMARY: Whole World needs complete education on way of life and Holistic good governance.
      Which the most of the people in the whole world are lacking it.
      Especially most developed nations lack knowledge n wisdom n gyan of entire Education System n Educational values 😪.

    • @spiritualyogiyogi6137
      @spiritualyogiyogi6137 2 роки тому +2

      Most developed civilization is Bharat with rich in knowledge , more higher than knowledge is Wisdom, more higher than Wisdom is Gyan. More Higher than Gyan is Dharma. Next quartion for you is tell me more higher than Dharma.
      Can you please answer. Which one more higher than Dharma.???
      There is no evidence doesn't mean it is a failed investigation. Dont worry. There will be some leads which will help in future. Just wait n watch for some results even if it is not a arrest. It is not easy to do arrest. You seemed to be very lesser experienced who is restless that some one will be arrested.

    • @thatmiscellaneousguy525
      @thatmiscellaneousguy525 2 роки тому

      @@spiritualyogiyogi6137 Money !

    • @spiritualyogiyogi6137
      @spiritualyogiyogi6137 2 роки тому

      @@thatmiscellaneousguy525 Congress Party from Britain's Royal-Hegemony-ERA to Dictatorship-Era is full sea of changes in ideas n ideological as follows
      1. Founder of Congress is British by Name Hume , Hegemony
      2. Motilal Neharu , Hegemony and the copycat of Royal-Dynasty-Builder's Politics
      3. MDK Gandhi, Boot licker of British n Britain's Royal kingdom
      4. Jawaharlal lal Neharu Again follower father's foot steps copycat of Royal-Dynasty-Builder's Politics .
      5. Indira Gandhi, the 99 percent controlling the Congress Party and a Dictator. Hegemony. ROYAL-DYNASTY-BUILDER. etc.
      6. Sonia Gandhi , A 100 Percent Dictator, Hegemony, Royal-Dynasty-Builder's, Nepotism + Bring Italy Politics ,
      + World No1 Proxy PM which never occurred in the whole 🌎 world.
      Her goals is continuing the Royal-Dynasty-Builder's Politics by Rahul or Priyanka Vadra to next level of heights of Hegemony n Dictatorship 🤔.

    • @spiritualyogiyogi6137
      @spiritualyogiyogi6137 2 роки тому

      @@thatmiscellaneousguy525 Sonia who kicks out her own Party members. (A World No1 Dynast Dictator with hidden POWER of unelected PM Post n An Anti-People) , Etc.
      She Kicked out many of her veteran congress members, many Resigned, indoctrination of Western -ve System into Bharatiya's +ve Values System, hidden Mastermind of Gujarat roits) + Her Rt. Hand MMS (Dynast Supporter)
      She kicked out Veterans like Sita Ram Kesri, SM Krishna, Sharad Pawar, Gulam Nabi Azad, Hemanta Biswa Sharma,
      PV N Rao, YSR Reddy, Etc
      1st Ranking Dictator Sonia, who Kicked out her own party sr. members like Congress President SitaramKesri.
      Sonia Kickedout many Congress CM Position Leaders n Sr. Members as follows:
      Ex CMs like SM KRISHNA, Sharad Pawar, MamthaBanerjee, Bangarappa etc,
      Future CM candidates like PA Sangma, Subrata Bhashi, YSR Reddy, MadhavRao Sindhe,
      She also kicked out other Sr. Congress leaders list are Jayanti Natarajan, Rita Bahuguna Joshi,
      SM Krishna n Bangarappa (Karnataka Ex.CMs)
      Srinivas Prasad (Kar), Mahesh Kumthalli, BC Patil, Ramesh Jarkiholi, Shivaram Hebbar, ST Somashekar, Muniratna, Pratap Gowda n Byrathi Basavaraj from Karnataka. Recently from UP are
      Ramkrishna Dwivedi, Satyadev Tripathi, Siraj Mehdi (former MLC), Santosh Singh (former MP), Bhoodhar Narayan Mishra (former MLA), Vinod Chaudhary (former MLA), Nek Chandra Pandey (former MLA), Etc.
      Dear Sonia, rectify your Blunders n Sins.
      Note: When highly skilled n experienced MM Singh can be RubberStamp to Dictator Sonia, Why not MMS will be RubberStamp to highly Smart n Most Experienced, PVN Rao.
      Logic is Right ?
      DYNAST Nepotism not just Family ?
      China=Congress=Corruption=Communism=Cunning=Nepotism
      Congress follows Nepotism to protect their Dynasties n Dynast politics. Entire Congress people try to protect this Dynast, even they do Nepotism to themselves.
      CONGRESS is very dangerous for the Security of our nation. Also They won't learn lessons to follow DEMOCRACY, but they always follow Dynasty-First-policy n Feudalism as high priority.
      All Economic Reforms Efforts n Work was executed by PVN Rao and Credit is given to MM Singh. Manmohan Singh is Puppet n RubberStamp of Rajiv n Sonia. He is Mount Everest Mastermind of hidden Agenda n hidden Scams, hidden money laundering or hide Sonia's BlackMoney, etc.
      He is honest to this family and dishonest to India. He should be called as " Dynast SLAVE ".
      In the END, we need n will END THIS DYNASTY POLITICS n indoctrination of western -ve culture.

  • @madhuraswani2369
    @madhuraswani2369 2 роки тому +4

    Why only divorce all marriage related laws should be scrapped with the same power.

  • @pritpalsidhu9044
    @pritpalsidhu9044 2 роки тому +1

    Kapil Sibal Saab Zindabad. We will always seek his blessings and able guidance. May god him and his family in all their future endeavors!

    • @abhimanyusingh6761
      @abhimanyusingh6761 2 роки тому

      He is a nonsense lawyer.
      I have listen him so many times...
      Most of his arguments are truthless .factless.
      By the way I am also Delhi based lawyer. His reputation in lawyer freternity is not commandable...he got cases because of his political connections...

  • @Binod273
    @Binod273 Рік тому +1

    My question/query-
    1. as we all know in todays modern world all genders are equal then why should only man have to give alimony to wife ? If wife is uneducated,housewife and dependent on husband then I can understand she needs temporary support and its essential when she has responsibility of child. But if she is educated or has ability to earn or she is working then why husband have to give alimony to her ??
    2. If extra marital relationships or adultery prove in court then also do husband have to give alimony or what ?

  • @mickie-thefoodieeman9511
    @mickie-thefoodieeman9511 8 місяців тому

    With such wonderful explanation by mr.sibbal..then too highest authority didn't approve n agreed shows how low our law n it's constitutions are..of no use

  • @giridharank1251
    @giridharank1251 2 роки тому +4

    While there is no doubt about the acumen of Kapil sibal on law and his arguements it is the type and characteristics of the cases especially on political lines that really is subject to criticisms..

    • @doncorleone3901
      @doncorleone3901 2 роки тому +1

      A lawyer's dharma is to provide the legal cover for his clients, much like a doctor. He cannot refuse a case because you feel bad sitting somewhere else

  • @bhb4756
    @bhb4756 2 роки тому +6

    Mr. Sibal's arguments are far from facts. Why does it take years litigating, all because of adjournment culture & that petty culture does not come from Mars, it comes from none other than judges & advocates. Judges are not willing to work without half of year going into summer, winter & extended festival vacations. More than litigants, judges & advocates are responsible for huge pendency & piles of cases due to multiplicity of litigation for same cause of action and then you sit/stand up & talk about it like Alice in Wonderland & say who created this mess. That's bigotry.

  • @janachaitanya7132
    @janachaitanya7132 2 роки тому +1

    Right argument

  • @TheBEASTs05
    @TheBEASTs05 2 роки тому +1

    Bhai kapil sibbal sahab ka jawab nahi 👍🔥

  • @manthanpatel4705
    @manthanpatel4705 Рік тому +2

    its a laughing stock for these judges go step in the shoes of those going through these henious litigative process

  • @rajghoshroy
    @rajghoshroy 2 роки тому +1

    Sibal argument is valid and thats the way it happens in countries like Australia - its a separate issue

  • @shortsbingeIndia
    @shortsbingeIndia 2 роки тому +5

    Please post the full video of this matter please

    • @bhb4756
      @bhb4756 2 роки тому

      It's there at NIC Channel ua-cam.com/video/LgF8vYbcwCY/v-deo.html

  • @harshvardhan5893
    @harshvardhan5893 2 роки тому +6

    Sashi Tharoor will win despite not being lawyer

  • @warriorx86
    @warriorx86 2 роки тому +5

    I beg to disagree that its the maintenance & child custody thats elongating divorce. It is the series of false cases like 498a, Dowry, DV.. and more maintenance in CrPc 125 that comes on men after filing divore which adds to multiple litigations running for 7-10yrs.

    • @779Art
      @779Art 2 роки тому

      Abolish 498A. This law is there for lawyers,politicians and cops to misuse. Mostly applied where expensive properties are involved.

  • @razaalam8764
    @razaalam8764 2 роки тому +2

    Superb

  • @ordinarypeopleextraordinar1172
    @ordinarypeopleextraordinar1172 2 роки тому

    Agree with Mr kapil Sibbal👍

  • @CreativeTechie101
    @CreativeTechie101 2 роки тому +2

    THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES NEED TO BE SERIOUS AND NOT TRY TO BE FUNNY IN SUCH SERIOUS MATTER !!!!

  • @amitbidwai3266
    @amitbidwai3266 2 роки тому

    All family matters must be solved and settled on fast track basis...it will save millions of life and indian society also

  • @veekay9977
    @veekay9977 2 роки тому +1

    I agree with Sibal ji

  • @PankajKumar-dh1mm
    @PankajKumar-dh1mm Рік тому

    Very good advice

  • @ravindrareddy1556
    @ravindrareddy1556 2 роки тому

    Is is excellent opportunity for the law students which give confidence to them

  • @raghupath
    @raghupath 2 роки тому

    This shows that there are some learned scholars who are good politicians.

  • @Dr.PrettyPsychiatrist
    @Dr.PrettyPsychiatrist 2 роки тому +2

    Disturbed Arrange marriages hardly reach court even.

  • @romilmahant2971
    @romilmahant2971 2 роки тому

    Brilliant argument

  • @ToseefAslam11
    @ToseefAslam11 2 роки тому

    Hearing sc live , nice

  • @Valueinvestment22
    @Valueinvestment22 2 роки тому +3

    Why allow Rajya sabha MP acts as a lawyer???

  • @zuberpathan7763
    @zuberpathan7763 2 роки тому +1

    What is the channel which record supreme court live broadcasting.

  • @Good2BGood76
    @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому +4

    I lost my 17 yrs because of falsely implicated case of dawary. Because of long court proceedings.

    • @LawChakra
      @LawChakra  2 роки тому

      Sympathy

    • @Good2BGood76
      @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому

      Sir simpathy won't full my gap and I am facing health issues and only left 15- 10 yrs to be on this planet. No one wants to marry me now . Not only that family members are also not responding to me .

    • @Good2BGood76
      @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому

      Not only I lived my life in depression and still in depression. Recently I became sucidal too and got admitted in IBHAS in Delhi.

    • @Good2BGood76
      @Good2BGood76 2 роки тому +1

      In meanwhile I changed my religion. Because I suffered a lot being Hindu . With a General caste (baneya) .

    • @SimonBelmont-zk6nn
      @SimonBelmont-zk6nn 2 роки тому +2

      @@Good2BGood76 omg I'm so sorry for you man. I'm also half baniya as my mom M.P baniya married a Tamil. They had a happy marriage until 06 my dad passed away due to kidney failure. Now I'm looking for Marriage some baniya girls but I'm scared as I feel they aren't really emotionally connected.

  • @Edu_Think.007
    @Edu_Think.007 2 роки тому

    Kapil ji ..... good explanation

  • @ToseefAslam11
    @ToseefAslam11 2 роки тому +1

    Such a great lawyer he is

  • @sharadchaudhary7231
    @sharadchaudhary7231 2 роки тому +8

    Exactly i want to say mr sibbal said

    • @LawChakra
      @LawChakra  2 роки тому

      Which line?

    • @syednaseer6076
      @syednaseer6076 2 роки тому +3

      @@LawChakra That 35 to 60 is the best part of the life, and getting into divorce litigations and running around courts is not worth it.. we will lose our precious years in courts.

    • @LawChakra
      @LawChakra  2 роки тому

      @@syednaseer6076 Agree.

  • @bratamalya2
    @bratamalya2 2 роки тому

    Nice arguments but I hope he was well connected to the people at the end of the queue

  • @Nostradamusknow
    @Nostradamusknow 2 роки тому +3

    The process is what makes divorce dreadful, once two people don't want to remain married, it's no one's business to make them stay together, grant the divorce asap and then treat the matter similar to a commercial dispute regarding financials, treat the custordy issue keeping best interest of the child.

  • @avin857
    @avin857 2 роки тому +2

    Easily divorce mil jyga to advocates and courts ka dhanda band nhi ho jayga... Isliye judges se koi umeed mat rakho

  • @harshvardhan5893
    @harshvardhan5893 2 роки тому +6

    English toh aese Bolte h... If they are originally from England. Colonial mindset

  • @bhaveshgupta2237
    @bhaveshgupta2237 2 роки тому +1

    This was the reason Western countries introduced concept of prenup.

    • @DeepakSharma-ip7lk
      @DeepakSharma-ip7lk 2 роки тому

      Wo bhi kam nhi kar rha h wife kah degi forcefully signature karaye husband ne phir wo bekar chla jata h

  • @AK-yw9qs
    @AK-yw9qs 2 роки тому +1

    Sibbal is quite a advocate no doubts about it. He can fend both god and devil and convince both😉

  • @Bhargava_P
    @Bhargava_P 2 роки тому +2

    I pray that no couple should have any rift between them and should live happily. But when it comes to the unfortunate situation of divorce, when the marriage is virtually dead, then the legal procedure should not stop them from moving on. Why should one party be stuck forever without getting a divorce, when the other person doesn't want to be in the relationship anymore ? All their prime age is gone running around the courts and police stations. Who can give back their lost time ? Divorce itself is a non existent thing in sanatan dharma. When it has made its way into the Hindu marriage act anyway, then why not make it smooth and save the children atleast from trauma ? There is a limit on how long maintenance needs to be paid and how much. It cannot be life long, where one person lives like a parasite without consenting to divorce.

    • @somu87i
      @somu87i 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly
      This generation ladies are educated and they can go job live their life after divorce snd no need to beg money from men
      Are the current generation women beggars?Grow you girl child educated , live independently and hence law must grant divorce but should not be a life lock
      Children should belong to both and not only to mother

  • @sahibvirk
    @sahibvirk 2 роки тому +1

    For the first time I am seeing h I m arguing for a good cause.

  • @azadhind2374
    @azadhind2374 Рік тому

    Divorce should be granted first and maintenance and custody case may continue.

  • @9810122191
    @9810122191 2 роки тому

    Inspiring

  • @wellbeing6198
    @wellbeing6198 2 роки тому

    Personally going to court is digging your own grave . Have not seen in my personal life where someone gone to court and had justice served

  • @narayanrao8339
    @narayanrao8339 2 роки тому +1

    Looks like as is prevailing in USA ?

  • @JamisKool
    @JamisKool 2 роки тому

    In most cases, all parties except litigants benefit monetarily in delaying judgements through fees and bribes. Expediting judgments is actually conflict of interest.

  • @touchingsouls795
    @touchingsouls795 2 роки тому +6

    Yes , even courts can't force couple to live together......why run cases in family, high courts, supreme court for 15/20 years ...
    First time I appreciate Kapil sibbal sir 🙏🙏....Huge respect for him

  • @yourbeautifulworld2816
    @yourbeautifulworld2816 2 роки тому +1

    Divorce matters are a matter of one's life, it should be taken on the lines of bail matters and be relieved in at Max 10 hearings, it saddening that law is wrong in this matter, not granting divorce throughout one's life even when divorce petitioner is ready to pay just alimony or maintenance, the divorce petitioner cannot start his / life afresh with someone else because of our laws.
    My brother case is like this , he married a women gave her a luxurious life, after seeing her conduct and mannerisms when he decided to divorce her and filed a case she has whole world powers to not let him take divorce unless mutually, even though marriage lasted 2 years, no children, aapropriate age, no police complaint ever , my brother first filed a divorce case followed by a fir on whole family even though she stayed with only 3 months with the family rest abroad, and a dv case, 22 travels between Delhi to nagpur in 1.5 year, this is the plight and treatment of law, now my brother want to start his life afresh with someone else officially, but can't.
    LIFE AND RESOURCES GETTING UNWARRANTED WASTED AND SPOILED .

  • @user-dostiBaniRaheBus
    @user-dostiBaniRaheBus 2 роки тому +4

    isse behtar video and audio quality to dusre HC ki hai....

  • @abckumar1333
    @abckumar1333 2 роки тому +1

    Family dispute should settle by panchayat, not by leftist in courts. Panchayat will do it at earliest

  • @sm9214
    @sm9214 2 роки тому

    I shudder to imagine what if it were a case involved reforms in marriage, divorce under Muslim law...
    Everyone will then argue "oh...
    No.....any such reforms have to emerge from within that religion.....no one should impose reforms from without".
    Cowards shouldn't pose as reformers. Reformer means reformer of all not a convenient few.

  • @VasanthKumar-mu2qu
    @VasanthKumar-mu2qu 2 роки тому +3

    HOW LAW CAN BE MISUSED. BEST EXAMPLE IS THIS ADVOCATE OF WRONG PEOPLE.

  • @sridhars2461
    @sridhars2461 3 місяці тому

    Remove Maintenance every will be alright.....if agreed only if both the parts are ready to exchange monetary