Same Sex Marriage: J Sai Deepak argues before CJI Chandrachud led bench in Supreme Court
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 чер 2023
- Advocate J Sai Deepak, a popular figure on Social Media for his pointed arguments keeps his side before the CJI Chandrachud-led bench in the Supreme Court of India. Sai Deepak argues on the Same Sex Marriage. hear his full argument.
#JSaiDeepak #CJIChandrachud #SameSexMarriage
Republic TV is India's no.1 English news channel since its launch. It is your one-stop destination for all the live news updates from India and around the world. Republic TV makes news accessible for you at your convenience, at all times and across devices. At Republic we keep you updated with up-to-the-minute news on politics, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, gadgets and much more.
We believe in Breaking the story and Breaking the Silence. But most importantly, for us ‘You Are Republic, We Are Your Voice.’
Also, Watch ►
Republic TV Live News Updates ►bit.ly/RepublicTVLiveNews
The Debate With Arnab Goswami ► bit.ly/TheDebateWithArnabGoswami
Patriot With Major Gaurav Arya ► bit.ly/PatriotFullEpisodes
Exclusive Sunday Debate With Arnab Goswami ► bit.ly/SundayDebate
Checkmate With Major Gaurav Arya (Retd.) ► bit.ly/3EtPj0s
The Grand Strategy With Maj Gen G.D Bakshi (Retd) ► bit.ly/3EPZ6xF
R.Explained ► bit.ly/3sOLT5K
R.Uninterrupted ► bit.ly/34isZdh
You can stay connected with Republic TV on -
Facebook - / republicworld
Twitter - / republic
Website - www.republicworld.com
Instagram: / republicworld
Disclaimer: Republic Media Network may provide content through third-party websites, operating systems, platforms, and portals (‘Third-Party Platforms’). Republic does not control and has no liability for Third-Party Platforms, including content hosted, advertisements, security, functionality, operation, or availability.
His flow of thought, argument and language is impressive.
I lawyer should know how to do that much!
i just hope its legalized lots of people will be pissed..so much fun.
Not just impressive. It is brilliant.
@@nirajsingh8403 Legalize what??
@@nirajsingh8403pissing people off is fun to you ?
There he has spoken the quantity of English in 20 minutes that I would speak in an entire year 😂
It is not the English that is impressive here. Even Shashi Tharoor or my English teacher could do that. It is the way he structured his arguments.
@@death_parade but people are only impressed by his speaking skills...bhale kuch smj bhi na pade fir bhi andho ki tarah j sai j sai karte hai 😂
@@pragneshkumar2517don't generalise people, not everyone is pragneshKumar (a.k.a you)
@@awaken_monk2314you nailed him....😁
I agreeed
This man will go deep in indian judicial history. And he will be remembered for long time.
We need him in BJP.
Like subramanian swamy and jethmalani
@@digitalbath6057let people work from outside for the sanatan
For speaking good english?
@@suyogshishupal30
If your focus is only on his english , you are right there ...
Even hon'ble CJI knows he is the man
He was put in place by the senior judge.
Nah it's just you
@@ShawonIn Haan hum galat nahi hai , judge galat hai. Naach na aawe aangan teda.
@@pnthrillz for real! 😂
@@pnthrillz BS. That senior judge was egoistic. That idiot will retire soon.
My goodness. All admirations about his fluency in English?
Seriously, no one has any opinion for or against his submission before the honorable SC?
No one can save our country's youth.
Wtf🤡🤡
@@AdityaKumar-nr9staye
@@AdityaKumar-pz3ko 🗿🗿
Yes....that is the irony...
His English is being appreciated even in his speeches related to other topics like Hinduism etc...
😂
I am simply overawed by his articulation, fluency, vocabulary, sense if economy of time and words. ..well everything. He never disappoints.
Lol
@@DipayanPyne94 kya lol? 😂😂 tumko bahut dikkat hai ?
@@adityadwivedi7672 Hai bhai. In general, aise type ke log often engage in Sophistry. Phir toh problem hogi bhai.
@@DipayanPyne94 tumko samajh nhi aarha argument ye bolo na. Apni murkhta chupane ke liye dusre ko kyun kharab bol rhe ho ? Seedha bolo tumko itni English samajh nhi aati. Simple
Many comments here showering blind praise on Sai Deepak without any thoughts on the issue itself..... shows the mindset of people.... nicely escaping the issue
I am partially exasperated at how people in the comment section are focused on his language skillset, vocabulary, etc. but not on the point he is trying to make. His language skills are appreciable, but the deep meaning and, again, the point he's trying to make, is way more vital...
Seriously,i even doubt SC's judges too here, were they able to get his whole argument as they bcoz of tiredness due to listening both sides continuously for hours sometimes miss on many things
The argument is rhetoric based. He is judging what and how the society should behave and the nature of social behaviour. That is unsubstantiated. More yap, less meaning.
@@aniketshukla3824 Yeah it looks more yap for a westernized mindset.
Sri Sai Deepak put forward his argument with clear thinking, excellent choice of words and showcasing his command over the language 👏🏻.
And no logic
@@kingshorntrue and also that's not the way one should speak, he goes on and on without breaks and his tone is rude too
@@neilbajwa8689 he talks just like that in TV shows too, phool* watch his debates gawar
@@RahulVerma-iv8phhe don't stop an armchair critique for no reason
@@kingshorn Yes.. You have that logic, no?.. 😂😂😂😂😂
Brilliant sir Sai Deepak. Please carry on with your fantastic work. May God bless you and all your loved ones with long, healthy and prosperous lives. Long long India.
My only worry is majority of the HC and SC judges will surely,with their mediocre quality,will rule against Sai Deepakbr abuse of their inferiority complex
the amount of people who are impressed solely because oh his language skills 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Colonial mindset
Let me put it down simply for you what you call language skill is simple court procedure and he raised brilliant points 1) how this more appropriately a legislative matter as it requires the opinion of multiple stakeholders and communities
2) how our constitution also has its culturally socialist democratic nature
3) that marriage Is a social contract and by breaking it down to an engagement only between two parties we ruin and demoralize the social construct pf it
Exactly 😂
English is the language of judiciary so that will be the case and his arguments are valid and logical else nothing lasts just because of an excellent orator.
Fact
I wish to see him as CJI in future, Indian justice system needs people like him. 🙏
he is advocate, not judge
@@mangekyo151advocates are become judge. Didn't you know.
You find his real thought he is preparing for CJI this time period
@@mangekyo151eminent jurist can bcm a CJI
@@ATAURATV To become CJI, you first need to be a judge
Excellent usage of vocabulary which suits to the point of argument. Highly respected language with deep meaning... Great advocate.. my humble respects to JSD Sir... 👏🙌🙌
Society should not be bothered about two individuals wanting to live together. Common sense.
This isn't about them living together, they are and should be free to do that, it's about govt recognition of their marriage
😂😂😂😂😂
They should live together but there should be no legal status of there living
Once this law is passed, we will move onto teaching gender ideology to kids in schools, like they do in amrika
but they are influencing others too thats the problem,
His advocacy comes out of unbordled honesty and cinviction of purpose.Elaquent,so well prepared and precise presentation..sure the Bench would be bedazzled ..need many more such honest advocates..hats off
Sorry for the spelling errors in my post🙏
@@n.vraman3953 😂😂😂typo they say, for typing wrong spellings. Accepted 🙏🙏🙏
Yes.typo ,sir
Oh please...somewhat same medieval arguments were presented in most western nations by lawyers who sided with backward Christian ideology... now what? No progressive democracy is siding with them..they have all legalized it. The same countries Indians flock to the most
😅😅😅
Brilliant argument ❤❤❤
Unmatchable and historical argument by young warrior of laws... Justice system definitely going to be revolutionized very soon 🚩
Awesome articulation and to the point. We are proud to have such type of lawyers in our midst .
I wonder if judges understood anything or not?😂😂
I didn't😢
Are u an idiot...Like literally,They are Supreme Court Judges...This argument By JSD was awesome with fluent knowledge of facts but as far as I know that these Judges are capable of understanding better then any of us and they also have a fine good knowledge of the constitution..
😂😂😂😂😂
That's why they are judges...not like you
Can't say about them, but I didn't understand what was he talking about
J sai deepak arguments are not only in flow but logical and in line with supportive judgements and legislative clauses.. His prayers almost go unhindered by Judges in courts.. 👌
he simply trying to argue against same sex marriage using fancy words, nothing else
Can we stop this nonsense of addressing judges as " Milords " ? After 75 yrs of independence why are courts still using these nonsense English titles ?
Because just like English imperialists, the people in courts are also imperialists. They are power hungry, authority centric people. Plato would call them Silver Men at Best.
It can’t be as long as those milords likes & enjoying such treatments quietly.
I agree. So, embarrassing 😮
Correct statement. May be we should be calling them Judge.
@@balajinarasimhan533 Why even that ? Even names are enough.
Best advocate in india
Nopes
@@pnthrillz yepes
😂 best, English acchi bolo to best.
@@kapild.3681 Aree laudam Chand uske arguments suno counter se defending tk fir smjh jaoge
@@kapild.3681tujhe samajh aayi 😂😂
If i remember i saw it very long back in the live law recordings. Not sure why this is taken so late here and posted. Anyway it is always very nice to hear Shri J Sai Deepak Ji articulate his position. 👌👏👏💥🔥👍🙏✌️
This guy is basically saying that old norms of medevial society should prevail over law and individual rights. He may use all the logic and language, but he is basically wrong
so effectively u are saying we don't need scientific argument i have already made up my mind on what's right
Two people can live together, can indulge into physical activities they want. However that doesn't change the meaning of Vivah, Nikah or Marriage.
@@eternallightoftruthwhat does vivah mean acc to the sources you're referring to?
We don't need mental patients to get married. Just look at the cultureless western countries.
He's wrong according to your system of belief
Ohh itni tej to Google translate bhi nahi kar sakta 😂😂😂 amazing sir
The lack of comments addressing J Sai Deepak's arguments in the comments section suggests that most people did not fully grasp what he said. It is a sad reality that while everyone is admiring his delivery, they are not engaging with the merits of his arguments.
my opinion live and let others live as they wish and do accordingly unless its hurting someone else directly
Absolutely
💯
PERIOD.
It is hurting the 96% population directly.
You did not hear the arguments?. It's not about live and let live the case is about socio-legal implications and constitutional validation of the case. Also the live and let live principle is with certain limitations.
Simply amazing peace of argument put forth effectively entwined with the benign responsibility aimed towards protection of our invaluable Indian culture. Great going Sai Deepak, our future Chief Justice of India.. May he be blessed with all the good things he wishes for
use 4 more fancy big words, and you'll be close to the rigour of JSD's argumentation, which is 0
@@taanisharora5577 those who sleep cannot be awaken. Those who are ignorant cannot be made knowledgable. You conclude as to which catwgory you belong to. One more example of the less knowledgable coming into hollow argument. Neither u r western nor u r Indian. U r in between. God bless u
We know who should resign.....Sai Deepak is absolutely awesome. Everyone is wanting to destroy Bharat.
ljasfjalksdjflkasjdfma
100% true and people are simply justifying this fact.
Sai Deepak is 💯 brilliant 👏 👌 👍
J Sai Deepak! His brilliance shines through.
So his position essentially, hidden in all the flowery language, is that A marriage is not a matter of only the two concerned, consenting, of legal age individuals but includes the entire society as well?
This case is much followed and anticipated one ..inspite of such articulate submissions by Sai Deepak sir what will court decide is awaited to be seen ....natural justice or unnatural justice ...time will tell
No amount of polished English & speed talk can negate the fundamental right of marriage between two people.
Thank you, Thank you very much sir!
Only if you were able to understand the words behind those polished english and speed talk, you would have understood that your fundamental right is so stoopid.
Whats there to thank here😅
Chudakad ye pata chalta tumlog ko English k bare mei kuch nhi aata chutiya type ki English h Sai ka
Homophobe hai
There wouldnt be this appreciation if only people wouldve actually understood his arguments tbh
We have understood his arguments very well....after that only we are saying that he is one of the bests .
Anybody who's regularly in touch with news can fairly get what he's saying.
And i think he should be appreciated regardless of his arguments too if one doesn't agrees with him BUT he's crisp and too the point And not like other elderly lawyers eating SC's time unnecessarily
@@Avant-garde1611 not really , other than being articulate there was not much substance in his arguments . You can't support a cause just because the speaker has got good oratory skills , that is exactly how u get convinced without realising why are u even supporting.
Secondly what older people are u talking about. Other side is Kapil sibbal the greatest lawyer ever . There's Tushar Mehta also , our solicitor general , again top lawyer.
J Sai Deepak is still a rookie lawyer whose articulation might help sway the mass on a speech but his arguments in court don't stand.
@@zookush1 On what basis are you opposing his argument then?
@@ramchandramohan182his only 2 main ideas were :
1) To determine a law on this is it legislative (parliament) prerogative or is it judicial. He kept saying society , legislative to show that such matters are social institution governed by laws and judiciary shouldn't intervene
2) his second idea was arguing that yes opposing same sex marriage is conservative but does conservatism has no place in constitution?
These arguments are okay maybe decent but def not that deserves like massive appreciation. It's 5/10 at best. Majorly because any law graduate would come to the exact same arguments the first time they sees this case. So there is no value addition and so are basic arguments. Plus his arguments are not enriched with past judgements or other legislation in diff countries as an example. It's looks like he is preaching an idea he believes to be true without showing any evidence of it.
Genius and brilliantly presented by J.Sai Deepak.
J.Sai Deepak Should be in Hague as top notch Lawyer
His clarity of thoughts, choices of words are just so impressive!!!!!
Great job by republic 👍Live streaming how judicially works..... Its democracy wr must know how judge make judgment's... 👍great
Brilliant! Brilliant J sai Deepak ji.Awesome argument.We want to see you as future CJI .
The only time I have not agreed with him.
I'm disappointed that an intelligent person like him failed to see the humanity in this case
Khusra marriage not allowed 😢
We will go from humanity to wokism just like in america. No need for such disgusting things
What an erudition! 🎉
Sai Deepak, in-depth analysis and precise clear argument.
Long live J Sai Deepak Sir
Jai Hind Sir
🇮🇳🇮🇳 Sai Deepak bro you are brilliant hats off Nation requires More person like you to save India democracy 🇮🇳👌👏🙏🙏🙏❤️👍👍👍
Listen, to his arguments not the articulation and verbosity. Because, in a nutshell, he stated heteronormativity is the norm which is an opinion he is entitled to have. But, it is not his to impose.
It is not solely the institution of marriage in its societal framework. It’s in the legal protection to the individuals involved. For example, spousal insurance or inheritance rights of spouses
Those who participate in the norm, is out of discussion? Well, he is a representative of heteronormativity. Hence, the argument stands invalid.
He is so young. I believe that he wiil be the greatest advocate of our country 💥
Superb argument....very intellectual. As mentioned by Deepak, judiciary cannot usurp other organs of state or society's powers.
This Guy is Miraculously Brilliant!
If this is what you call brilliance then hey Man,you are very far far away from the truths and things happening on the ground level
@stealthgamingkills891 I think you need that advice more than anyone else.
Actually Miraculous.
Mentally healthy Advocate till now.
😂
@@stealthgamingkills891 he is brillisnt not because he has good communication skills he is brilliant because he placed his view inbest manner with hard facts and reference
Hats Off!
He Is Totally an Educated Andhbhakt!!!
Tu kya uneducated gand bhakth kya
Ja na andhnamzi
युद्धबंदी के रूप में महिलाएं आपकी सेक्स गुलाम हैं
कुरान के अनुसार गुलाम महिला सेक्स गुलाम होती है।
और विवाहित स्त्रियाँ भी तुम्हारे लिए वर्जित हैं, सिवाय उन स्त्रियों के जो तुम्हारे दाहिने हाथ की हों। [यह] तुम्हारे लिए अल्लाह का आदेश है। और तुम्हारे लिए इन से परे [अन्य सभी] वैध हैं, [बशर्ते] कि तुम उन्हें अपनी संपत्ति से [उपहार] देकर पवित्रता की इच्छा करो, न कि अवैध संभोग की इच्छा से। अतः तुम उनसे जो कुछ भी भोगो, उसके बदले उन्हें दायित्व के रूप में उनका उचित मुआवजा दो। और दायित्व से परे जिस बात पर आप परस्पर सहमत होते हैं, उसके लिए आप पर कोई दोष नहीं है। निस्संदेह, अल्लाह जानने वाला और तत्वदर्शी है। (अध्याय 4:24)कुरान में कई बार दाहिना हाथ रखने का उल्लेख किया गया है। 7वीं शताब्दी के अरब के समय में, युद्ध में पकड़े गए किसी भी व्यक्ति को राइट हैंड पास्ड यानी गुलाम कहा जाता था। यदि आपने किसी महिला को यौन दासी के रूप में पकड़ लिया है तो इसकी अनुमति है। आपको उनसे शादी करने की ज़रूरत नहीं है, अल्लाह ने उन्हें आपके लिए सेक्स टॉय बनने की इजाज़त दी है। असहमति में? आइए सुनन अबी दाऊद किताब 12 से एक हदीस पर नजर डालें यानी विवाह (किताब अल-निकाह) हदीस 110, ग्रेड: सहीहअबू सईद अल खुदरी ने कहा, “अल्लाह के रसूल ने हुनैन की लड़ाई के अवसर पर अवतास में एक सैन्य अभियान भेजा। वे अपने शत्रु से मिले और उनसे युद्ध किया। उन्होंने उन्हें हरा दिया और बंदी बना लिया। अल्लाह के रसूल के कुछ साथी अपने बुतपरस्त पतियों के कारण महिला बंदियों के साथ संबंध बनाने के लिए अनिच्छुक थे। तो, अल्लाह तआला ने कुरान की आयत भेजी "और उन (बंदियों) को छोड़कर जिन्हें आपके दाहिने हाथ ने पकड़ लिया है, आपके लिए सभी विवाहित महिलाएं (वर्जित हैं)।" कहने का तात्पर्य यह है कि जब वे अपनी प्रतीक्षा अवधि पूरी कर लेते हैं तो वे उनके लिए वैध हैं।सही मुस्लिम से हदीस, विवाह की पुस्तक, हदीस 3371, ग्रेड: सही अबू सिरमा ने अबू सईद अल खादरी (अल्लाह उससे प्रसन्न) से कहा: 0 अबू सईद, क्या आपने अल्लाह के दूत को अल-अज़ल का उल्लेख करते हुए सुना है? उन्होंने कहा: हाँ, और कहा: हम अल्लाह के दूत के साथ बाहर गए थे? बिल-मुस्तलिक के अभियान पर और कुछ उत्कृष्ट अरब महिलाओं को बंदी बना लिया; और हम ने उन्हें चाहा, क्योंकि हम अपनी पत्नियों के वियोग से पीड़ित थे, (परन्तु साथ ही) हम ने उनके लिये छुड़ौती भी चाही। इसलिए हमने उनके साथ संभोग करने का फैसला किया, लेकिन 'एज़ल' (गर्भाधान से बचने के लिए वीर्य के उत्सर्जन से पहले पुरुष यौन अंग को बाहर निकालना) का पालन करते हुए। लेकिन हमने कहा: हम एक कार्य कर रहे हैं जबकि अल्लाह का दूत हमारे बीच में है; उससे क्यों नहीं पूछा? तो हमने अल्लाह के रसूल से पूछा, और उन्होंने कहा: इससे कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता कि तुम ऐसा नहीं करते, क्योंकि पुनरुत्थान के दिन तक पैदा होने वाली हर आत्मा पैदा होगी।
I cant comprehend what he is even speaking with that fluency. Commendable job.
So sharp with his words while still not toppling the lordship's composure. That's an art.
Why them call Lords and Lordships? They dont even respects uniqueness of Gender of Male and Female and Space of Marriage. For them individuals interests and freedom even though its crude and unwise it is, they still hang on question of Male and female. Just very painful to see Judiciary Time is wasted.
Marriage is Holy and Sacred and its not for gimmick nor Physical companion alone.
Why can't we just call them sir, respected judge or any such terms instead of saying lord / lordship, every now and then ?
Actually the CJI and the rest of the judges in SC should think of changing this colonial tradition
Well said. Very true👍🙏💐
Saying "my lords" should be banned, ok once in the opening is fine but beyond that, it is so fking annoying. This colonial way of functioning of courts must be changed.
EGO of CJI is on TOP, GOD please save Maa Bharathi from WOKE mindset.
So true .. ye hate bas jaldi se ..woke scumbag
Pura suna tumne? EGO to kahi nahy dikha...ya perception hai ye tumhara?
This is not ego.. its the process.. our court should be neutral whenever hearing any case.. and this is what our CJI is doing.. good job sir
What ego ?
In the court, the judge has to listen to both the sides. That's exactly what he's doing. He's giving proper time to the advocates of both the sides and not just giving his verdict directly.
I don't see any 'ego' here.
@@krishkumariitbhu bro in logo ko keh diya gaya hai ki CJI ego lekar chal raha hai.. aur ye andh budhhi usiko propagate karta phirta hai
Sai Deapak's argument is absolutely Illogical. He is missing the basic common sense aspect rather than anything else...
and what's that? please mention
@@Aryannnnnn217 he is missing some basic common sense .😏
@@Aryannnnnn217Two individuals of consenting age should be allowed to get into marriage, regardless of sexuality. Marriage is not "man and woman" as everybody believes
@@cinnamon6452 For your kind Knowledge, SC rejected it
@@cinnamon6452 absolutely. And thats the reason you see all that opaque & thick vocabulary along with laws of Thermodynamics to curtain the absence of logic in his argument.
How stupids comments can be (most off )
What i am seeing is just
How good he is in english
Omg his fluency
I was looking for some brain storming perspectives but soon realised that most of the audience that is supporting jsd dont even got 20% 😂
Lol, flunked your primary?
Agreed
On what basis are you opposing then!?😂
In just one word, this submission before the Hon'ble SC bench by Shri Sai Deepak is brilliant. His eloquence speaks volumes. He has a very bright future. God bless him.🙏👍
An encyclopaedia with clear communication.Sai Deepak is an asset 🎉🎊🥰
The salves, Malanis, Mistries, sibals, etc etc just pale before this jagurnaut sai deepak.
Hail sai deepak, the future PM of india
@@muthyamyandamuri4420 💯
So well argued. Bravo 👏 👏. Brilliant as always.
Wow... Goosebumps❤😊
the arguments JSD is putting forward are excellent
You all are true sense patriots.
J Sai Deepak & you are doing great.
Just waiting for Republic TV Global.
Kab aayega bhai ye Republic Global have been hearing about it for more than two years now
Seperation of power is basic structure of constitution. Any legislation on any aspect HAS to be done via parliament and not judiciary. Good argument by Sai
Accidentally Privileged who are straight have so many things to say about who are not.
What's new?
Exactly
It is not about previlage. It is about common sense.
It is about living in the same society together with different opinions but also considering different safety and futuristic aspects.
@@sampatkalyan3103 use your common sense you will understand that it is privilege
@@kingshorn how about you using your common sense instead of labeling everything as privilege.
Jai Sai Deepak Sir 's agrue with judges is just phenomenal. The jugdes can't even keep up with him , everytime. I have to watch at slower speed to understand his arguments.
Waiting for him to become CJI.
Maybe because he was given only 20 mins to speak that's what anyone would do.
One of the longest argue without using the word "my lord"
Inshort he is telling the majority should decide what happens in society
this sort of argument about preserving this "social character" were literally used to defend sati, child marriage, untouchability and most of india's social ills, except back then i dont think there were people appreciating those people's "language and vocabulary" without understanding half of what's being said
women ☕
So true
this is so on point
The only sane comment. Kudos miss
Quiet libbie
Jai ho! Jai Sai Deepak. Salute to your thought process
Fantastic JSD! Hope better sense prevails on the SC.
With the present set of judges, it is sure that indian judiciary will teach and school international judicial fora that the right of individual liberty is more important and imperative than right to live.
That is impressive lawyerspeak for what should otherwise read "Murder is perfectly legal and acceptable", or am I interpreting your statement wrong? I could be because I am no lawyer myself.
50% of What Sai Say, I dont understand...too good.😀😀
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It is well understood.. there are subtitles for the same reason.. he is super fast express.. he said 20 mins is less.. but with his speed.. he in fact finished in 15 mins..
But myl😢rds have understood, but still they will not agree with Mr. Sai Deepak because simply they don't want to... power, power, power.😂😂😂
Lol 😂very true . Very long story English sentences , vocabulary and points based on LAW. Only lords can understand 😂
That's how lawyers speak my friend.
Fine and clarifies and defines the subject and the argument is flawless...
Wonderful, Sai rocks!!
Great Layer Sai Deepakji the submissio is precise , logical and analytical.The flow of his arguments is like flow of The river Ganga.
sach bolu kuch samaj nahi aya but sunne mein bahut accha laga kash me bhi iska 50% english bol pata. Kudos to Shree J Sai Deepak sir. Thank you so much for everything you are doing for dharma.
Kudos mt likh phir
Majoritarian social conditioning cannot be the définition of equal rights. However high your language may be, the basis of comprehension, ideals and understanding should be just. Humanism is not pejorative wokism.
The Argument is simply outstanding!
00:07 J Sai Deepak argues for the distinction between Fetters and Powers
01:41 Society's agency in discussions and law vs legislative prerogative.
03:16 Legislative competence and societal participation in societal perspectives.
04:56 Chapter 9 of the manual deals with legislative procedures.
06:38 J Sai Deepak argues for proper legislative procedure in the Supreme Court
08:18 Revisiting normative attitudes in public morality and the limitations of using the court as an instrumental for societal change
10:48 The judgment primarily concerns self-identification within the context of gender identity.
12:34 International law does not impose binding precedent for recognition of marital units.
C\
Brilliant
I admire 'sir' Sai Deepak no matter what..
Conclusion: Judicial decisions shouldn't be the first approach for issues that are related to religion and legislation for so many years over the history of Bharat.
Clarity of thought and communication is amazing.
Basically he is trying to say that gay marriage is immoral, all buried under a word salad.
Superb argument 👌
excellent
Wow iam impressed how this guy maintains his calmness, honour and respect... Truly inspiring.
New and more energetic and enthusiastic version of late Ram Jethmalani 😊😊
Stop addressing them as lords😮
His knowledge level is brilliant and argument is awesome ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
He forced to judges to talk themselves क्योंकि इसका ज्ञान एक व्यक्ति के संभालने की चीज नही है 😅😅😂😂😂😂😂
That judge is shaken by the rapid, splendid and powerful argument and language displayed by Jai.
I kept checking whether I had sped up the video or not!
👏🏻👌🏻👍🏻✌
most important point is demeaning fundamental and losing the value of marriage.
And most concerned /bothered is addressing the impact of the decision on society in future....that is most dangerous and threatening or abusing mankind.
Can you enumerate how this can be dangerous, threatening and abusing mankind in more detail?
@vedamrutanalla6201 then please visit American once you will find your answer
Sai Deepak is one of the gems of India.
Very eloquent ! Wow.
Awesome mind and intellect.
It is not about society it is about individual fundamental right
Go marry your dog
Very nicely articulated dear Sai
He is undoubtedly the best gem .....long live Sai Deepak.
Effective presentation on the subject