You two are like Napoleon and Tsar Alexander. Collaborating and work together and reconquer Constantinople. United Europe. Thank you two UA-cam Emperors. 😊
I love that part where the French penetrated 'pause' the heart of the Ottoman command. But it could have been much worse, they could have done so from the rear, having caught the Ottomans with their pants down.
What if three part timeline. 1, This napoleon rome. 2, America goes full colonial. 3, British Imperial Federation. How would the 1900s and 2000s be different if these 3 nations were perfected
Bravo, great job, and it’s a real pleasure to watch your videos on alternative history. However, I feel that in your video, you somewhat overlook other aspects of Napoleon's defeat, such as the revolts of the Prussian and Austrian kings, who at that time were very angry with Napoleon. Not to mention that the Balkans are considered by the Austrians as a backyard to exert their influence. In my opinion, if Napoleon had wanted to consider invading the Ottoman Empire, he would not have declared war on Spain but on Austria to ensure that they would not intervene in the Russo-French invasion of the Ottoman Empire. This is just a simple point of view.
I’ve long been fascinated by the idea of a longer Peace of Amiens, giving Napoleon the breathing room to build an economic empire. Picture the Continental System as a Customs Union, instead.
Eu nunca soube o porque dos otomanos não tiveram uma participação mais ativa nas guerras napoleonicas, esse vídeo me ajudou a entender um pouco sobre isso
So I'm assuming we're not getting the zoroastrian reconquista since it's been 2 months and we haven't seen it yet. Which is kind of sad because I would have been a really interesting scenario. (Also its now the most voted video idea on the original Poll)
Future video suggestions: What if King Charles I and the Royalists won the English civil war? And what if the Jacobite rebellion was successful? I would love to see these videos in the future.
Yes, and the video ignores the reality of how that went in favor of romanticism on napoleon's campaigns. The facts of the matter is that napleon couldn't take constantinople and everything in asia because the muslim majority would endlessly revolt and would fight to the alst man, as we saw with the horrible egypt campaign. WW1 showed us even a dismantled turkey would retain key areas via revolt, and the peninsular war showed us napoleon was incapable, even at his height of power, at suppressing real revolts. It simply doesn't matter how much napoleon wins, he had zero chance of taking more than ottoman rumelia (balkans), and that would have been largely reversed in the final coalition war to keep the balance of power in east europe. The crimean war showed us players like britain will happily help the "turkic invaders" if it keeps the balance of power.
@@resentfuldragon you're focusing on Napoleon too much and outright forgetting the Russians who would more than likely commit something that would make the Holocaust look like kindergarten and the Ottomans probably wouldn't even have as much Muslims left.
@@sphyxiation You´re focusing on the prior records of turko-russian wars, the russians largely invaded vassal states like romania and valachia and used them to launch to cause revolts to disrupt supply routes and other crucial infrastructure to stop us being able to mountain a defense. If russia was to try and get anatolia itself it would swiftly be defeated because the heartland was very much turkish and wouldnt surrender, the russians would have to send an army thousands of kilometres away, try to keep an information network running, not get pummeled by guerilla tactics. Even at the weakest state of the ottoman empire they still were able to muster up defenses good enough to keep the british, french, greeks, armenians, arab revolts and russians at bay and ultimately even outlived the russians
It was actually found, through examination of his hair, that Napoleon was poisoned and it was not his stomach problems that killed him as they found an excess of arsenic on his hair
Although Washington was put in charge of the US Army incase of a French invasion, he let Hamilton really take charge, & Washington died a year later But maybe we could say "what if he lived another 2 years" or something, idk
I disagree, it ignored how napoleon suffered historically in egypt and iberia with revolts, he had zero chance of keeping constantinople even at the height of his power, afterall he couldn't keep neighboring iberia. Egypt had the same level of rebel activity, let alone the ottoman heartland which would have revolted even harder.
Hmm...With how you explain history and how I recently came across a video in my recommended feed that goes over how Native Americans would develop into a "Medieval Era" of sorts with showing the Geo-Political territories of the potential nations to come of it, It makes me wonder. "What If Europe never discovered the Americas" Perhaps you could explore how the Mayans, Aztecs, Incas, and any other civilization that could've arrisen develop without Euopeam influence.
Bro thus video is just wrong although the Egyptian hated the mamluks they hated the french more read the amount of revelotions the Egyptian made against the french this video in inaccurate even if it is alternative history
What if Hannibel has marched on Rome after Cannae as maybe he didn't have enough troops, but considering Roman determination had been a major factor why they came out ontop in the first Punic Wars, Hannibel would need to target the head of the snake, and seeing how well he understood the Roman mindset up till that point, it's not impossible that he could decide to make such a gamble and hope that the fear he had built among the Romans would be enough to sway them Though Hannibel would pragmatically need to keep any conditions reasonable as too harsh and they'll refuse them and choose to fight, and it might cost him too much to win all those battles similr to Napoleon centuries later. At the very least, they'll probably keep thier hold in Spain, and maybe even gain the right to expand further north into France, competing with the Romans down the line.
I think Britain would focus more on Portugal and spain front cause it is closer to Britain and easier to knock out France if Napoleon is away in the MiddleEast.
A real fewer dream, as if the ottamans and british would fall that much. How about the rebels/rebellions? And why would the Armeniens instead of independence want Russian rule? And during that time the ottaman goverment my have been disunited, but the people were not and with the help of the british, anyone willing to fight would have been mobilized. Either russia and france would have been stalled or they would have been even pushed back
The Turks were getting demolished by the Serbs with the Russians alone until 1812, what makes you think they’d last any longer than Austria or the German states?
@@leonrothier6638 The fact that the germans and austrians rebelled against france during the occupation and even before the russia campaign. The French army deployed in them behaved that badly that nobody wanted to have them there. What helps the Ottamans on top are the British who throw their weight and full support behind the Ottamans and that defensive wars even back then took 3 times more troops to win. The Ottomans were not that backward and they had full british support for innovation (modernization was not yet nessesary as their armies were good enough). Lastly the people of the Empire were not yet nationalistic as they were later on in the empire and the muslim regions would help/support the sultan with all they have when he woud decleare a ji had (unlike in our timeline when the sultan did that towards the end of the empire)
the Turks were only majority in large parts of Anatolia, the Balkans was made up of serbs, croats, Bosnians, Montenegrans, Bulgarians, Greeks, Albanians, who would welcome the French as liberators if they played their cards right, which is very likely, the balkans honestly would've probably of fallen in a matter of months as the 2 great powers smash into the Ottoman balkans. Anatolia too would probably welcome the Russians as liberators, probably not seeing rebels too. You clearly have 0 idea how brutal the Ottomans were towards the minority populations of the empire, Realistically, the Ottoman empire would collapse within a few years, especially if they lose Constantinople, the Ottomans were already on a rapid decline at this point The real question is would they be able to maintain control of these regions once the empire collapses and the territory is divided up between the 2 giants.
@@bossy1496 If Napoleon had allied with Russia to invade the Ottoman Empire instead of attacking Russia in 1812, the outcome might have been quite different from a straightforward victory. The Ottoman Empire, though weakened, was still a significant power with a large, multi-ethnic population that included Greeks, Serbs, Bulgarians, Armenians, Arabs, and others. Many of these minorities had grievances against Ottoman rule, which could have been both a vulnerability and a complicating factor during an invasion. The invading forces might have attempted to incite rebellions among these groups to weaken Ottoman defenses. However, managing these uprisings could have been challenging, potentially leading to instability that neither France nor Russia could easily control. Moreover, the diverse interests of Napoleon and Tsar Alexander I might have led to disagreements over territorial divisions, especially concerning strategic areas like the Balkans and the straits of the Dardanelles and Bosporus. European powers such as Britain and Austria would likely have intervened to prevent a significant shift in the balance of power. Britain had a vested interest in keeping the Ottoman Empire intact as a buffer against Russian expansion toward the Mediterranean and to protect its trade routes to India. Austria, concerned about Russian influence in the Balkans, might have formed an alliance with Britain and the Ottomans to counter the Franco-Russian threat. In Europe, the diversion of French and Russian troops to the Ottoman front could have encouraged rebellions and nationalist movements in territories under French control, such as Spain and parts of Germany. Resistance movements might have gained momentum due to the reduced military presence, undermining Napoleon’s dominance in Europe. Given these complexities, it’s possible that the Ottoman Empire would not have been easily defeated. The combined resistance from the Ottomans, supported by Britain and Austria, along with internal challenges faced by France and Russia, could have led to a prolonged and costly conflict. This scenario might have strained the resources of both invading nations and accelerated Napoleon’s downfall, without achieving the intended territorial gains. If the people welcome the Russians and French, how do you think people in France and Russia think about their repression? The Tatars or other Muslims and Germans? If the French and Russian armies are distracted by the Ottamans do you really think that France and Russia would not collapse internally?
I have been wait for this video for the past half decade i am so happy it was made. but i did think it would be Napoleon eygpt campaign being more successful
Persia may tale advantage of the situation to take over Iraq. In real history they did fight the Ottomans in early 1800s and gained impressive victories though the war did eventually changed little from the status quo.
The main idea of video is not good tho. The napoleons plan was after conquest of egypt he will go to the india. And if napoleon enter anatolia probably he will never leave anatolia again because its impossible to handle anatolian vilayet army (like 120k irregualar infantry w kapikulu and nizam-i cedid soliders 120k irregualar + 70k Line infantry)
If that happened they would colonize Jamaica and the Mosquito Coast. After the fall of the Empire the Mali Emperors would flee to Jamaica and Jamaica will become an independent sultanate ruled by the Mali Emperors as Sultans. Many African slaves and African Americans who would suffer racial discrimination would flee to the Sultanate of Jamaica. The Sultanate of Jamaica would become the one and only Muslim nation in the United States.
Mail was not a proper empire like the Romans or the persians. They were a petty tribe who got their hands of gold and managed it well. The only power that was able of discovering and colonising Americas before the European was Punic/Carthagians.
video başında anlatıyor zaten - İngilizler Fransız donanmasını yenince çekilmek zorunda kalıyorlar. Bide Suriye'de Osman-İngiliz ordusuna yeniliyorlar.
except that this would never be succecful. in pretty much all russo turkish wars the turkish may have been militarily outmatched but were able to hold the russians off and not let them pass the danube no matter how much of a large they defeat they faced, same goes for in the caucuses sometimes the ottomans would get beaten but they would be able to stop the advance. the big problem would be napoleon. but since the border with bosnia is covered by mountanais terrain i think the ottomans would be able to hold off napoleons army. and with the brittish fleet combined with the ottoman fleet. they would rule the seas. but if napoleon does take bosnia than the ottomans can get pushed back but i doubt that hed be able to take constantinople. the ottmans would just rebel again and again. in actuality he tried and failed and in this scenario he would too. plus with brittish aid the ottomans should be able to somewhat be able to clutch.
This would never happen, the Ottomans already defeated napeleon in 1799, the French were already overextended and the British + the Ottomans would manhandle the French if they tried.
@Dougoul the siege of Acre was a direct confrontation between the Ottoman Army and British reinforcement against Napeleon himself. It ended in a defeat for Napeleon and made him betray his army by fleeing back to France. This was the first occasion where Napeleon was defeated and gave the coalition hope that ultimately resulted in his demise.
Almost like it’s a “Alternate History” 😮 it’s not meant to be realistic and even real history isn’t realistic 😂 a man rose from a tribe in bum fuck nowhere in Mongolia and conquered 20-30% of the worlds population
@dizzle632 1. Unrealistic alternative history is just another name for fiction while realistic alternative history is just another name for continuing less likely historical possibilities. 2. You must be ignorant of the mongol society at that time if you think they weren't destined to repeat the achievements of previous Turkic khaganates which they are related to.
There was no other way to invade the Ottomans in 1799 besides a naval invasion like in Egypt which was destined to fail eventually. In this scenario he would’ve had access to the Balkans and therefore, Istanbul would fall within a few weeks if not less.
bullshut pruissa wil easy kl napile lir IRL PUR?EN WIN AND PREU?E WIN GERMAN TROP WAS in paris 1814,1815,1871 ,1940-1944 and sooon 2033 to 9999999999999999999999999999
Turks would get scewed prety badly had this happened - ottoman empire would completely disintegrate. Even in the real timeline, it was close to being dismantled had the Anglo_Franco alliance not worked hard to keep it intact against Russians
lol history is written by the victors and politics and the culture of the times have much to do with that… It will be interesting to see what the history books say of the events in our lifetime… But it’s difficult to be completely unbiased when discussing history… If someone has a channel dedicated to history, I feel they’re entitled to publish whatever they choose…whether biased towards one political leaning or another. I’m curious what videos of MZ have you felt are too “right wing “? Genuinely asking…
Was fantastic collaborating with you mate, looking forward to the next one 👍
Another one.
You two are like Napoleon and Tsar Alexander. Collaborating and work together and reconquer Constantinople. United Europe. Thank you two UA-cam Emperors. 😊
Our bro’s here!
I love that part where the French penetrated 'pause' the heart of the Ottoman command. But it could have been much worse, they could have done so from the rear, having caught the Ottomans with their pants down.
awesome to see you two collaborate
Video idea what if George Washington became Emperor of The American Empire
@@votetheodore2048 Oh god, that'd be perfect.
@MeanBeanComedy perfect as in a perfect Video or perfect as in it would be perfect if George Washington was Emperor?
@@votetheodore2048 .........Yes
His first move would be to make it not an empire
@@Porsche911-s3u it's a vid idea you don't have to take it so seriously
What if three part timeline.
1, This napoleon rome.
2, America goes full colonial.
3, British Imperial Federation.
How would the 1900s and 2000s be different if these 3 nations were perfected
Bro REALLY wants full colonial America
Bravo, great job, and it’s a real pleasure to watch your videos on alternative history.
However, I feel that in your video, you somewhat overlook other aspects of Napoleon's defeat, such as the revolts of the Prussian and Austrian kings, who at that time were very angry with Napoleon.
Not to mention that the Balkans are considered by the Austrians as a backyard to exert their influence.
In my opinion, if Napoleon had wanted to consider invading the Ottoman Empire, he would not have declared war on Spain but on Austria to ensure that they would not intervene in the Russo-French invasion of the Ottoman Empire.
This is just a simple point of view.
I’ve long been fascinated by the idea of a longer Peace of Amiens, giving Napoleon the breathing room to build an economic empire. Picture the Continental System as a Customs Union, instead.
LOVE YOUR CONTENT! thanks For this ❤❤❤❤❤
THIS IS FIRE!
EPIC CROSSOVER! suggestion: What if the first mexican empire survived
I second this. 👍
Hasn't possible history already done that?
Do you mean territorially or as in the monarchy remains
What if Spanish Loyalists in Peru managed to hold out and create a Spanish type Dominion
This actually almost happened look up napoleon's agents contacts with Ali Pasha of Ionnania, an autonomous Albanian Eyalet.
What if the Lancasters won the Wars of the Roses? or What if Richard III survived Bosworth?
Awesome collab :]).
What if Queen Victoria united Europe(Somehow)?
Eu nunca soube o porque dos otomanos não tiveram uma participação mais ativa nas guerras napoleonicas, esse vídeo me ajudou a entender um pouco sobre isso
THIS IS AMAZING!
both Caesar and Alexander went to Egypt
only makes sense that Napoleon wants to follow them as well
So I'm assuming we're not getting the zoroastrian reconquista since it's been 2 months and we haven't seen it yet. Which is kind of sad because I would have been a really interesting scenario. (Also its now the most voted video idea on the original Poll)
It’s on the way don’t worry
Future video suggestions: What if King Charles I and the Royalists won the English civil war? And what if the Jacobite rebellion was successful? I would love to see these videos in the future.
Didn't Napoleon already invade the Ottomans?
Yes and he FUCKING feel to conqueror the OTTOMAN TURKISH EMPIRE
Yes
Yes, and the video ignores the reality of how that went in favor of romanticism on napoleon's campaigns.
The facts of the matter is that napleon couldn't take constantinople and everything in asia because the muslim majority would endlessly revolt and would fight to the alst man, as we saw with the horrible egypt campaign.
WW1 showed us even a dismantled turkey would retain key areas via revolt, and the peninsular war showed us napoleon was incapable, even at his height of power, at suppressing real revolts.
It simply doesn't matter how much napoleon wins, he had zero chance of taking more than ottoman rumelia (balkans), and that would have been largely reversed in the final coalition war to keep the balance of power in east europe.
The crimean war showed us players like britain will happily help the "turkic invaders" if it keeps the balance of power.
@@resentfuldragon you're focusing on Napoleon too much and outright forgetting the Russians who would more than likely commit something that would make the Holocaust look like kindergarten and the Ottomans probably wouldn't even have as much Muslims left.
@@sphyxiation You´re focusing on the prior records of turko-russian wars, the russians largely invaded vassal states like romania and valachia and used them to launch to cause revolts to disrupt supply routes and other crucial infrastructure to stop us being able to mountain a defense. If russia was to try and get anatolia itself it would swiftly be defeated because the heartland was very much turkish and wouldnt surrender, the russians would have to send an army thousands of kilometres away, try to keep an information network running, not get pummeled by guerilla tactics. Even at the weakest state of the ottoman empire they still were able to muster up defenses good enough to keep the british, french, greeks, armenians, arab revolts and russians at bay and ultimately even outlived the russians
It was actually found, through examination of his hair, that Napoleon was poisoned and it was not his stomach problems that killed him as they found an excess of arsenic on his hair
Ottoman:NUH UH
What if the "Quasi-War" (1798-1800) went hot (we could have seen George Washington vs Napoleon)
Although Washington was put in charge of the US Army incase of a French invasion, he let Hamilton really take charge, & Washington died a year later
But maybe we could say "what if he lived another 2 years" or something, idk
Very nice idea and great video. Video idea: what if the treaty of sevres was followed/ what if the greeks defeated Mustafa Kamal
I think it would be reasonable to prevent the duchy of warsaw in this scenario
really cool idea
I wish that they did save us from ottomans
The perfect timeline
It would nice if the Russians creates a "Kingdom of Chaldo-Assyria" for the assyrians
Now when can I see your What If Russia Kept Alaska video again?
Ottoman Situation be like: 😨😨😨😨😭😭😭😭😭
But in reality first wes like: 🤮🤮🤮🤮
Then it was like: 🤣🤣🤣🤣
you guys COOKED
I disagree, it ignored how napoleon suffered historically in egypt and iberia with revolts, he had zero chance of keeping constantinople even at the height of his power, afterall he couldn't keep neighboring iberia.
Egypt had the same level of rebel activity, let alone the ottoman heartland which would have revolted even harder.
Next one, what if Napoleon’s invasion of Russia succeeded? Like if his forces that entered Russia were more successful and Russia folded
Oh US of Z, do you take suggestions from the comments or do you expressly take suggestions from Discord?
One thing for sure. It would be warmer than Russia and not as not as Egypt.
What if US lost a battle of 1812?
I mean we tried to invade Canada and failed horribly
@nathanlocation and the the big house painted white went up in flames
Based alternative history.
what if Novgorod formed russia.
@@imperialdragoon9715 novgorod would have to unify itself first
it is doable.
@@imperialdragoon9715 how doe
For a second, I thought you drew napoleon as a centar in the thumbnail.
Hmm...With how you explain history and how I recently came across a video in my recommended feed that goes over how Native Americans would develop into a "Medieval Era" of sorts with showing the Geo-Political territories of the potential nations to come of it, It makes me wonder. "What If Europe never discovered the Americas" Perhaps you could explore how the Mayans, Aztecs, Incas, and any other civilization that could've arrisen develop without Euopeam influence.
Love this!!!!!
Constantinople would be Christian
Nah, I think it would be a blend of Christians and Muslims.
A city of Russians, Chechnyans, Turks, Greeks, and Bulgars
*Good Ending*
@@TurtleChad1 hahaha 🤣 no
It would be Slavic and French. Pissing off the Romans living there who see it as rightfully theirs not Slavic and Germanic
They forgot to say that they were Christians forced to convert
Bro thus video is just wrong although the Egyptian hated the mamluks they hated the french more read the amount of revelotions the Egyptian made against the french this video in inaccurate even if it is alternative history
What if Hannibel has marched on Rome after Cannae as maybe he didn't have enough troops, but considering Roman determination had been a major factor why they came out ontop in the first Punic Wars, Hannibel would need to target the head of the snake, and seeing how well he understood the Roman mindset up till that point, it's not impossible that he could decide to make such a gamble and hope that the fear he had built among the Romans would be enough to sway them
Though Hannibel would pragmatically need to keep any conditions reasonable as too harsh and they'll refuse them and choose to fight, and it might cost him too much to win all those battles similr to Napoleon centuries later. At the very least, they'll probably keep thier hold in Spain, and maybe even gain the right to expand further north into France, competing with the Romans down the line.
What if Ashanti Industrialized?
no
I think Britain would focus more on Portugal and spain front cause it is closer to Britain and easier to knock out France if Napoleon is away in the MiddleEast.
What if Napoleon was a God of War?
A real fewer dream, as if the ottamans and british would fall that much. How about the rebels/rebellions? And why would the Armeniens instead of independence want Russian rule? And during that time the ottaman goverment my have been disunited, but the people were not and with the help of the british, anyone willing to fight would have been mobilized. Either russia and france would have been stalled or they would have been even pushed back
The Turks were getting demolished by the Serbs with the Russians alone until 1812, what makes you think they’d last any longer than Austria or the German states?
@@leonrothier6638 The fact that the germans and austrians rebelled against france during the occupation and even before the russia campaign. The French army deployed in them behaved that badly that nobody wanted to have them there. What helps the Ottamans on top are the British who throw their weight and full support behind the Ottamans and that defensive wars even back then took 3 times more troops to win. The Ottomans were not that backward and they had full british support for innovation (modernization was not yet nessesary as their armies were good enough). Lastly the people of the Empire were not yet nationalistic as they were later on in the empire and the muslim regions would help/support the sultan with all they have when he woud decleare a ji had (unlike in our timeline when the sultan did that towards the end of the empire)
even the armenian and assyrian regions would support them (some of the greeks as well)
the Turks were only majority in large parts of Anatolia, the Balkans was made up of serbs, croats, Bosnians, Montenegrans, Bulgarians, Greeks, Albanians, who would welcome the French as liberators if they played their cards right, which is very likely, the balkans honestly would've probably of fallen in a matter of months as the 2 great powers smash into the Ottoman balkans.
Anatolia too would probably welcome the Russians as liberators, probably not seeing rebels too. You clearly have 0 idea how brutal the Ottomans were towards the minority populations of the empire, Realistically, the Ottoman empire would collapse within a few years, especially if they lose Constantinople, the Ottomans were already on a rapid decline at this point
The real question is would they be able to maintain control of these regions once the empire collapses and the territory is divided up between the 2 giants.
@@bossy1496 If Napoleon had allied with Russia to invade the Ottoman Empire instead of attacking Russia in 1812, the outcome might have been quite different from a straightforward victory. The Ottoman Empire, though weakened, was still a significant power with a large, multi-ethnic population that included Greeks, Serbs, Bulgarians, Armenians, Arabs, and others. Many of these minorities had grievances against Ottoman rule, which could have been both a vulnerability and a complicating factor during an invasion.
The invading forces might have attempted to incite rebellions among these groups to weaken Ottoman defenses. However, managing these uprisings could have been challenging, potentially leading to instability that neither France nor Russia could easily control. Moreover, the diverse interests of Napoleon and Tsar Alexander I might have led to disagreements over territorial divisions, especially concerning strategic areas like the Balkans and the straits of the Dardanelles and Bosporus.
European powers such as Britain and Austria would likely have intervened to prevent a significant shift in the balance of power. Britain had a vested interest in keeping the Ottoman Empire intact as a buffer against Russian expansion toward the Mediterranean and to protect its trade routes to India. Austria, concerned about Russian influence in the Balkans, might have formed an alliance with Britain and the Ottomans to counter the Franco-Russian threat.
In Europe, the diversion of French and Russian troops to the Ottoman front could have encouraged rebellions and nationalist movements in territories under French control, such as Spain and parts of Germany. Resistance movements might have gained momentum due to the reduced military presence, undermining Napoleon’s dominance in Europe.
Given these complexities, it’s possible that the Ottoman Empire would not have been easily defeated. The combined resistance from the Ottomans, supported by Britain and Austria, along with internal challenges faced by France and Russia, could have led to a prolonged and costly conflict. This scenario might have strained the resources of both invading nations and accelerated Napoleon’s downfall, without achieving the intended territorial gains. If the people welcome the Russians and French, how do you think people in France and Russia think about their repression? The Tatars or other Muslims and Germans? If the French and Russian armies are distracted by the Ottamans do you really think that France and Russia would not collapse internally?
I have been wait for this video for the past half decade i am so happy it was made. but i did think it would be Napoleon eygpt campaign being more successful
Persia may tale advantage of the situation to take over Iraq. In real history they did fight the Ottomans in early 1800s and gained impressive victories though the war did eventually changed little from the status quo.
The main idea of video is not good tho. The napoleons plan was after conquest of egypt he will go to the india. And if napoleon enter anatolia probably he will never leave anatolia again because its impossible to handle anatolian vilayet army (like 120k irregualar infantry w kapikulu and nizam-i cedid soliders 120k irregualar + 70k Line infantry)
what if everything went perfectly for qing china
What if The Mali Empire Had Discover The America's ?
If that happened they would colonize Jamaica and the Mosquito Coast. After the fall of the Empire the Mali Emperors would flee to Jamaica and Jamaica will become an independent sultanate ruled by the Mali Emperors as Sultans.
Many African slaves and African Americans who would suffer racial discrimination would flee to the Sultanate of Jamaica. The Sultanate of Jamaica would become the one and only Muslim nation in the United States.
Mail was not a proper empire like the Romans or the persians. They were a petty tribe who got their hands of gold and managed it well.
The only power that was able of discovering and colonising Americas before the European was Punic/Carthagians.
Knowing alexander he would probably find another way to start a war with napoleon after the Turks are defeated.
What if he conqueres at all?
Napoleon already invaded Ottoman Empire.
video başında anlatıyor zaten - İngilizler Fransız donanmasını yenince çekilmek zorunda kalıyorlar. Bide Suriye'de Osman-İngiliz ordusuna yeniliyorlar.
FIRST!!!! Great way to start the weekend!!! Lets GOOOOOO!!
French invasion of Syria and Egypt:
Beautiful endeavor. Brought so many academic and cultural results!
“Pause”
The Roman Empire
except that this would never be succecful. in pretty much all russo turkish wars the turkish may have been militarily outmatched but were able to hold the russians off and not let them pass the danube no matter how much of a large they defeat they faced, same goes for in the caucuses sometimes the ottomans would get beaten but they would be able to stop the advance. the big problem would be napoleon. but since the border with bosnia is covered by mountanais terrain i think the ottomans would be able to hold off napoleons army. and with the brittish fleet combined with the ottoman fleet. they would rule the seas. but if napoleon does take bosnia than the ottomans can get pushed back but i doubt that hed be able to take constantinople. the ottmans would just rebel again and again. in actuality he tried and failed and in this scenario he would too. plus with brittish aid the ottomans should be able to somewhat be able to clutch.
he is defeated napeleon 1799 battle of acre.
That took place in the Egypt campaign
The based timeline
25:42 💀
Clever flag
Porque os otomanos não se juntaram a Napoleão a invasão da Rússia? Tenho curiosidade sobre isso
Eles tinham acabado de assinar a paz com a Rússia (desculpe, estou usando um tradutor)
@DeanMonsieur ok obrigado por me ajudar nisso e não precisa se desculpar por isso
This would never happen, the Ottomans already defeated napeleon in 1799, the French were already overextended and the British + the Ottomans would manhandle the French if they tried.
It wasn't really the Ottomans who defeated them, it was the British who carried the effort
@Dougoul the siege of Acre was a direct confrontation between the Ottoman Army and British reinforcement against Napeleon himself. It ended in a defeat for Napeleon and made him betray his army by fleeing back to France. This was the first occasion where Napeleon was defeated and gave the coalition hope that ultimately resulted in his demise.
Almost like it’s a “Alternate History” 😮 it’s not meant to be realistic and even real history isn’t realistic 😂 a man rose from a tribe in bum fuck nowhere in Mongolia and conquered 20-30% of the worlds population
@dizzle632 1. Unrealistic alternative history is just another name for fiction while realistic alternative history is just another name for continuing less likely historical possibilities. 2. You must be ignorant of the mongol society at that time if you think they weren't destined to repeat the achievements of previous Turkic khaganates which they are related to.
There was no other way to invade the Ottomans in 1799 besides a naval invasion like in Egypt which was destined to fail eventually. In this scenario he would’ve had access to the Balkans and therefore, Istanbul would fall within a few weeks if not less.
bullshut pruissa wil easy kl napile lir IRL PUR?EN WIN AND PREU?E WIN GERMAN TROP WAS in paris 1814,1815,1871 ,1940-1944 and sooon 2033 to 9999999999999999999999999999
Another video where Turks gets screwed
Turks would get scewed prety badly had this happened - ottoman empire would completely disintegrate. Even in the real timeline, it was close to being dismantled had the Anglo_Franco alliance not worked hard to keep it intact against Russians
Can you please post some Polish propaganda?
lol YOU should post some Polish propaganda!
@Seeker0fTruth Yes Sir
@@pep-qew 😉🫡😎
What is Serbia in 1444 destroyed ottoman and took all of europe please 🙏
!
16:54
2:29 that's a French Cuirassier, not a Mamluke horseman bruh.
The first one is a mamluk and the second is the frenchman following him bro
Better channel than the right-wing Monsieur Z
@@JCEurovisionFan1996 it's his other channel
Also what's wrong with being right wing
lol history is written by the victors and politics and the culture of the times have much to do with that… It will be interesting to see what the history books say of the events in our lifetime… But it’s difficult to be completely unbiased when discussing history… If someone has a channel dedicated to history, I feel they’re entitled to publish whatever they choose…whether biased towards one political leaning or another. I’m curious what videos of MZ have you felt are too “right wing “? Genuinely asking…
@@SIGMAOHIORIZZ88 pretty sure the right is like Nationalists and Fascists