Buddha and Ashoka: Crash Course World History #6

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
  • In which John relates a condensed history of India, post-Indus Valley Civilization. John explores Hinduism and the origins of Buddhism. He also gets into the reign of Ashoka, the Buddhist emperor who, in spite of Buddhism's structural disapproval of violence, managed to win a bunch of battles.
    Chapters:
    Introduction 00:00
    The Vedas 0:55
    The Caste System 1:33
    Dharma 2:40
    Samsara, Moksha, and Karma 3:33
    Buddhism 5:18
    Chutes and Ladders 8:04
    Ashoka 9:18
    Hinduism 11:04
    Credits 11:47
    Resources:
    India: A History by John Keay: bit.ly/3uEgVxE
    The Bhagavad Gita: bit.ly/3O8A96l
    The Bhagavad Gita, Upanishads, and Rig Veda, all-in-one edition: bit.ly/3xqP85N
    Credits:
    Executive Producer: John Green
    Producer: Stan Muller
    Writer and historian: Raoul Meyer
    Script Supervisor: Danica Johnson
    Music: Jason Weidner
    Thought Bubble is a product of the Smart Bubble Society: dft.ba/-smartbubble
    the Smart Bubble Society is:
    Suzanna Brusikiewicz
    Jonathon Corbiere
    Nick Counter
    Allan Levy
    James Tuer
    Adam Winnik
    Set Design: Donna Sink
    Props: Brian McCutcheon
    Photos:
    David Shankbone
    ClipWorks
    Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Instagram - / thecrashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @TheMayman613
    @TheMayman613 5 років тому +3838

    "10 min is not enough time to cover everything"
    *2 min on chutes and ladders*

    • @ThinhNguyen-dk2uy
      @ThinhNguyen-dk2uy 4 роки тому +42

      u forgot the fact that he added the outro

    • @arthurvangraan1781
      @arthurvangraan1781 4 роки тому +111

      If you think about it, he could be hinting towards the fact that buddhism is about accepting the universe as it is - random, cold and cruel (like snakes and ladders) and making peace with it instead of finding distractions that make you forget about it or provide a distorted perception of the universe.

    • @alyssaburdick5710
      @alyssaburdick5710 4 роки тому +41

      Arthur van Graan nah he was just bitter from losing to his son

    • @Jake-ls7zs
      @Jake-ls7zs 4 роки тому +3

      same

    • @markm1751
      @markm1751 4 роки тому +2

      lul

  • @saketg5954
    @saketg5954 8 років тому +3075

    "Life is full of suffering,
    and the most recurring suffering,
    is youtube buffering"
    ~Bud'dah, 3rd World Problemsupanishad

  • @hari-krishnakoipallil8436
    @hari-krishnakoipallil8436 7 років тому +1616

    I, being an Indian, love this episode, especially his mispronunciations.

    • @naishmika5491
      @naishmika5491 4 роки тому +126

      I love how he pronounces kshatriya, but man He's tryin

    • @srivatsavyaddanapudi7772
      @srivatsavyaddanapudi7772 4 роки тому +38

      I loved his pronunciation of Dharma and the Bhagavad Gita.

    • @evernightrose5152
      @evernightrose5152 4 роки тому +7

      I know right!

    • @adityasapkotakami3723
      @adityasapkotakami3723 4 роки тому +55

      But isn't it funny that when Indians pronounce some English word in their own accent they are immediately stigmatized by (well you guessed it) Indians themselves and here we are finding John cute when he can't even pronounce Ganga(he didn't even try).
      But then as he said it, snakes and ladder was invented in India (maybe that's why he talked about it for extra 2 minutes).
      Well, Maybe...

    • @chanakyadevil
      @chanakyadevil 4 роки тому +9

      @@adityasapkotakami3723 that do be whack

  • @JakeBroe
    @JakeBroe 5 років тому +1054

    I feel like if Siddhartha Guatama were to time travel to the present day... he'd say nothing has really changed and all the problems he identified 3000 years ago still apply.

    • @ivan_nagar
      @ivan_nagar 4 роки тому +8

      Gautam* they misspelt it in the video

    • @alokbaluni8760
      @alokbaluni8760 4 роки тому +11

      That's why his ideology is a fairy tale

    • @adamplentl5588
      @adamplentl5588 4 роки тому +56

      @@alokbaluni8760 how so?

    • @adamhedley8924
      @adamhedley8924 4 роки тому +2

      bastard stole my delorian

    • @dawnfm00
      @dawnfm00 4 роки тому +5

      Very true my mate, that's what I have thought all the time.

  • @vonderstroy
    @vonderstroy 5 років тому +3225

    Dude, why not take your time? I wouldn't mind watching an 80 hours long chapter about India if it's from Crash Course.

    • @mukulbhamarde7314
      @mukulbhamarde7314 4 роки тому +52

      Can we seetle for buddha just being a human who got enlighted, apart from debating about his nationality...

    • @XPrincess30
      @XPrincess30 4 роки тому +212

      Then it wouldn’t be “crash course”

    • @alesha5997
      @alesha5997 4 роки тому +20

      80 hours is way more then just a day bruh

    • @awesomemantroll1088
      @awesomemantroll1088 4 роки тому +17

      @@alesha5997 We're all taking all-nighters anyways...

    • @oatmeal7563
      @oatmeal7563 4 роки тому +6

      Mukul Bhamarde what

  • @TheWorldPillow
    @TheWorldPillow 9 років тому +2443

    People complain he talks too fast? I got an AP Test tomorrow, put it to 2x speed.

    • @TheWorldPillow
      @TheWorldPillow 9 років тому +7

      ***** Good luck!!

    • @marissamoreno3146
      @marissamoreno3146 9 років тому +49

      im in the same boat as y'all and honestly john green has taught me more than my teacher

    • @TheWorldPillow
      @TheWorldPillow 9 років тому +5

      Marissa Moreno Hey, at least it's over now, right?
      ***** Can you elaborate more, please?

    • @TheWorldPillow
      @TheWorldPillow 9 років тому +9

      ***** I got a 4, and I'm pretty happy with it. I'm not entirely sure if John Green was the reason for that though XD

    • @jayfared7858
      @jayfared7858 9 років тому +4

      +TheShadowPillow Im going through this RIGHT NOW HELLP!!

  • @AnkitPanwarr
    @AnkitPanwarr 6 років тому +1168

    hey guys one more fun fact : did you ever saw a round circle of blue colour in centre of India's flag , its Ashoka Chakra , it is directly taken from Ashoka's empire in modern day Indian Flag

    • @saigiri4693
      @saigiri4693 5 років тому +28

      Hmm... I thought it represented the wheel that Gandhi worked on.

    • @sauravpaul1075
      @sauravpaul1075 5 років тому +57

      SaiTUP Ashok Chakra has 24 spokes (unlike Gandhi cloth machine), which depicted 24 hours a day and it rotates as times passes by.

    • @MrJayson204
      @MrJayson204 5 років тому +61

      Biplov Bhattarai Nepal wasn’t a country back then

    • @sauravpaul1075
      @sauravpaul1075 5 років тому +17

      @@MrJayson204 It wasn't called India either. That was Aryavarta.

    • @MrJayson204
      @MrJayson204 5 років тому +34

      @@sauravpaul1075 Not saying it was called India, neither. Though I understand that the identify of India has always existed, even under various different names.

  • @juanmaya9146
    @juanmaya9146 5 років тому +1391

    No one:
    Every AP world history student who has the exam tomorrow: “WhO ElSE iS wATcHInG tHIs FOr tHe ExAM TOmoRroW?”

  • @bodhadeepika4720
    @bodhadeepika4720 7 років тому +1634

    CORRECTION: Buddha does not mean Teacher. It means "Awakened One". Guru
    is closer to teacher, but etymologically means "dispeller of darkness."

    • @bodhadeepika4720
      @bodhadeepika4720 7 років тому +20

      Interesting. So how is Bodha, which translates into English best as knowledge, meant to be pronounced?

    • @exXoDia7
      @exXoDia7 7 років тому +2

      Proper reply to Varoon

    • @franscine1232
      @franscine1232 7 років тому +57

      basically buddha means WOKE AF

    • @vrisage
      @vrisage 7 років тому +2

      true

    • @gauravmshr
      @gauravmshr 7 років тому +21

      +Varoon 'Bodha' is the word for Buddhism in Hindi, which literally means 'of Buddha'

  • @willieclark2256
    @willieclark2256 7 років тому +1074

    Arjuna wasn't a bad warrior. The conflict he was facing was whether or not to fight morally.

    • @ayushshah3357
      @ayushshah3357 7 років тому +45

      Jacob Clark truely said

    • @SashaWtheweirdoanimallover
      @SashaWtheweirdoanimallover 7 років тому +6

      So what did he decide when the Krishna told him that he was supposed to fight regardless?

    • @ayushshah3357
      @ayushshah3357 7 років тому +9

      Sasha W He fought

    • @ayushshah3357
      @ayushshah3357 7 років тому +95

      Sasha W He fought war against his own relatives..the kaurav..... because according to Krishna One must always try to take stand against Evil and Wrong irrespective of relationship and bounding.....One must not think of fruits.... but must only work i.e we are bound to work and not worry about results.... it's a great epic..... You can watch the series on UA-cam or buy the book..... named Bhagvad Gita Online....

    • @SashaWtheweirdoanimallover
      @SashaWtheweirdoanimallover 7 років тому +11

      Ayush Gupta Thank You!

  • @uttaraasthana504
    @uttaraasthana504 5 років тому +185

    In Mahabharat, Arjun was faced with the prospect of killing his own teachers and family members in the battle field as they belonged to the other side.
    He was given the option to either ask for more warriors to help him in the war or Lord Krishna himself.
    Arjun asked Lord Krishna to be on his side. He was engaged in a tough battle with his own self on how could he possible take lives of his loved ones.
    The essence of Mahabharat lies in the dialogues that took place between Arjun and Lord Krishna who constantly reminded him of his duties in the battlefield.

  • @aasthasharma3820
    @aasthasharma3820 5 років тому +148

    49.999999% of comments: wHo hErE hAs aN aP tEsT tOmMoRrOw
    49.999999% of comments: correcting john on Indian history/pronunciations
    0.0000002% of comments: irrelevant stuff

    • @maitreyasharma761
      @maitreyasharma761 4 роки тому +5

      don't see anyone doing the former or the latter. the third option is happening a lot just like your own comment.

  • @MauroEnfermoDeLepra
    @MauroEnfermoDeLepra 10 років тому +266

    This is actual WORLD history. I hate every time I open a "world" history book wich is just history of Europe and later America.

    • @dzarko55
      @dzarko55 10 років тому +4

      Exactly.

    • @ignatiushegelvoss6881
      @ignatiushegelvoss6881 10 років тому +5

      Whoa its tyrion

    • @ilovehistory5210
      @ilovehistory5210 10 років тому +6

      pretty much :( I want to learn about Viking and Norse myths not from the internet but it looks like I have to, but no we have to learn about boring ancient Europe(well the middle ages for me is boring).

    • @dzarko55
      @dzarko55 10 років тому +4

      I love History! Well, I'm kinda lucky in that regard - I'm from Norway. While we do not have much actual viking history, msot people know quite a bit about them. I, for one, am a descendant of a certain Harald Bluetooth, who was a Viking King in Sweden.

    • @haye7475
      @haye7475 10 років тому +26

      euro-centrism. that is what that is.
      it sucks.

  • @jasmine_kye
    @jasmine_kye 8 років тому +433

    I'm not taking any tests but I find this super fun to watch. This is so much more interesting than Malaysian History.

    • @AshMenon
      @AshMenon 8 років тому +19

      As a fellow Malaysian, _yes_! This is so much better than what we learned in school.

    • @19235641
      @19235641 8 років тому +7

      +Ash Menon I'm watching this for the Sejarah test tomorrow.

    • @AshMenon
      @AshMenon 8 років тому

      19235641 Haha good luck, mate!

    • @jasmine_kye
      @jasmine_kye 8 років тому

      19235641 good luck!

    • @bhimsenthapamagar1693
      @bhimsenthapamagar1693 8 років тому

      whatt

  • @lusciouslocks8790
    @lusciouslocks8790 5 років тому +299

    Nobody:
    John Green: "MY BABY SON BEAT ME AT CHUTES AND LADDERS THIS GAME SHOULD BE ILLEGAL."

  • @remeismith3466
    @remeismith3466 4 роки тому +396

    When you spend 5 minutes talking about how you only have 10 minutes... 😂

  • @sleepy_sensei3913
    @sleepy_sensei3913 7 років тому +332

    I'd just like to correct you as an Indian.... there were four noble sights seen by Buddha: the old man, the sick man, the dead man, and a sage whose calmness was what attracted Siddtharta Gautama to become a sage himself...

    • @alexanderfortier5488
      @alexanderfortier5488 7 років тому +26

      There are different versions of stories. However, the text that's most relevant does not speak of a sage.

    • @sleepy_sensei3913
      @sleepy_sensei3913 7 років тому +19

      so I'm relating to a story rgat I've heard... also I'm not angry or anything... in fact I love all of John's and Hank's videos on crash course and I have watched these before my exams, but I thought I'd just say what I believed to be correct

    • @christopherscottb
      @christopherscottb 6 років тому +9

      +rupali goyal: I'm an American, but I've also always heard your version with the ascetic.

    • @ManvilS
      @ManvilS 5 років тому +3

      Please read " Buddha and His Dhamma "

    • @maeyham4336
      @maeyham4336 5 років тому +1

      I recently read Siddhartha by Herman Hesse. It was enlighting and although it had the same premise as Hank described, the plot was completely different. There was no old man, sick man or dead man. But there were representations of each three in different forms.

  • @rajatshubhromukhrjee
    @rajatshubhromukhrjee 10 років тому +126

    A small correction here... The caste system did not begin as the caste system as we know today or as we have known in the past 1000 years... Caste system began as the Varna system where the duty and the performer of the duty was pre-decided... There was mobility within the Varnas (theoretical classification of duty) however the practiced version was that of Jati or Caste where the group was endogamously locked based on further classifications and exogamously defined by classifications of Gotra (same community or cow shed where girls and boys living in that community are considered brothers and sisters). It has kind of melded away now, but still practiced staunchly causing deaths if girls and boys decide to elope and marry in their own Gotra... So basically Varna was supposedly an ideal system as mentioned in Rig Veda's Purush Sookt, but they essentially indicated at Duties and those those who performed them, and not people who were bound to certain activities... What the Gita says is actually that, what one has been chosen to do must perform as his Dharma, but it does not mean a Kshatriya couldn't be a Brahmin... But once a Kshatriya, be a Kshatriya...
    But as happens with all great thoughts, people twist them and abuse them... As Bhimrao Ambedkar says, caste system is prevailed through the institution of marriage, it is actually true that those who realized that this social system could be used to wield power, actually devised the caste system to serve that purpose... religion has historically been a bad mix of good thoughts and nefarious practices...

    • @rajatshubhromukhrjee
      @rajatshubhromukhrjee 10 років тому +12

      Oh yes, instead of saying that Mahabharata is a battle between two kingdoms, it is perhaps better to say that it is a battle between two groups within a Kingdom... The Kauravas, the 100 strong brothers, sons of Kuru, and the Pandavas, the 5 brothers, the sons of Pandu, and their one wife... Kuru and Pandu were brothers... And it basically shows why gambling is bad... :P

    • @wampower6848
      @wampower6848 9 років тому +1

      I think he was trying to simplify

    • @Vivenk88
      @Vivenk88 9 років тому +4

      *****
      That is the later version of the varna system you are speaking of. Brahmin is one of learning, and whose life is based on sustenance (as opposed to the 'rajas' trait of being imperial or ostentatious). Most later Brahmins were only called so due to their lineage (which was not the actual intent of the varna). You will notice the word 'Brahmana' used in the exact meaning of it even in Buddhist texts.

    • @nupuramailb5864
      @nupuramailb5864 9 років тому +2

      Caste system has been remarkably non violent even upto times of Gandhi. For five milleniums this system worked with scope for truth, non-violence and artistic and economic expression. The communists who beat up the Brahmins are gone after 7 decades. The post WW-II western system, free any many aspects, nominally honest, not so non-violent if you are in Syria, Iraq,Ukraine is not even a century old.

    • @questking5910
      @questking5910 9 років тому +1

      castle system?

  • @snips1204
    @snips1204 6 років тому +159

    "I don't want to say that he's not my intellectual equal, but I'm potty trained"
    - John Green

  • @adventureawaits3860
    @adventureawaits3860 5 років тому +266

    Buddha means Enlightened One and not Teacher

    • @c.a.t.732
      @c.a.t.732 4 роки тому +19

      I think more specifically it means "Awakened One", but yeah.

    • @adamplentl5588
      @adamplentl5588 4 роки тому +17

      Did you know that words can have more than one meaning?

    • @puneetmishra4726
      @puneetmishra4726 4 роки тому +23

      @@adamplentl5588 Indic language are unlike English. Most words have unique meaning. Here Buddha maeans 'he who enlightened'

    • @divyanshumishra3670
      @divyanshumishra3670 4 роки тому +18

      @@adamplentl5588 Nope, most Hindi and other Indian language words have unique meaning, unlike English and some other western languages.
      Most of the words are "Eka-arthi" or Single-meaning words
      As in this case, Buddha actually means "the Enlightened One".
      But talking about "The Teacher", which is what John Green said, "Guru" is the Hindi word for Teacher and not Buddha.

  • @alfredpardoe3795
    @alfredpardoe3795 8 років тому +481

    Considering how complex both Hinduism and Buddhism are (easily more complex than Islam, Christianity and Judaism combined) he does a good job of giving an overview of the religions. Lots more to know to understand it and the more you know about the religions the more you would be inclined to say that some of the "facts" he gives out in the video are false by his literal words, however for a basic over view to someone who knows nothing its pretty good (and accurate).

    • @alfredpardoe3795
      @alfredpardoe3795 8 років тому +4

      +Alfred Pardoe Biggest single issue "Achieving Nirvana/Nibbana/Moksa maybe even in this life" is in no way correct. Even if a Buddhist monk was to perfectly follow the 8-Fold Path and head Dhukka 100% to his final breath, he still wouldn't achieve it in this life. He would have a extreme minimum one more, and likely plenty more.

    • @alfredpardoe3795
      @alfredpardoe3795 8 років тому +2

      +Alfred Pardoe Did he say Dhamma? or Dharma? Massive difference!

    • @alfredpardoe3795
      @alfredpardoe3795 8 років тому

      The first comment. It is a good overview of your teething someone who knows nothing about the subject. I so happen to know quite a bit about it. To the second comment I just couldn't quite tell which he says,

    • @stephenkirby1264
      @stephenkirby1264 8 років тому +2

      +Alfred Pardoe ... all the complexity you attribute, the ''detail drivel'' as I call it, is not necessary, nor is any of the ''Islam, Christianity, and Judaism combined'' of which you speak, necessary for an individual to unendarken themselves to the point of ''Knowing'', by which point all the ''detail drivel'' i.e. ''teachings'', will dissolve into insignificance, will be understood to be preschooleresque in any of its human conceptions...at which point the individual will be experiencing enlightenment...it is that simple...

    • @2CSST2
      @2CSST2 8 років тому +15

      +Alfred Pardoe Buddhims easily is much more interesting than the main monotheistic religions but I'm not sure about that claim that it is more complex. Actually one of the advantage of buddhism is that it has a core idea that is coherent throughout. Sure there are alot of details and extremely long litterature but the 8 steps as shown just in this video resume well the main idea. For the main monotheistic religions, on the contrary, there are tons of inconsistencies and mutually contradicting ideas, which makes it way more complex in my opinion, and you can't really talk about them in simple and fluid terms as you can for buddhism.

  • @johnshrestha2472
    @johnshrestha2472 8 років тому +65

    I like when John( Crash Course) talk about relations between Buddhism and Hinduism. We, the people of Nepal, (especially in Kathmandu Valley) have a good respect to both . There is tons of evidence supporting this statement. One of them is the "Jatra" we are celebrating in this month. This Jatra is of god call as "Rato Machhindra-nath", which is the common festival of both Buddhism and Hinduism. So, in my point of view, he has presented reliable information on this topic. And at last, thank you, Crash Course for this wonderful video.

    • @chaitanyakulkarni9585
      @chaitanyakulkarni9585 8 років тому +9

      yeah we share common moto of world peace

    • @amitbhatnagar6344
      @amitbhatnagar6344 6 років тому +5

      Its probably same in the India as well.Its difficult to generalize but I see it as Hindus see Buddha as a Vishnu's Avatar so it elicits a sense of respect and love towards Buddhist.
      I am a Kayasth by caste and it is said that there was a Kayasth king in Kashmir who practiced both Hinduism and Buddhism.
      P.S. - Kayasth means a Kshatriya who's educated as a Bhraman.

    • @nikobellic3716
      @nikobellic3716 6 років тому

      John Shrestha hey brother we odias also celebrate a festival called RATHA JATRA to worship our odia Hindu god JAGGARNATH.

    • @ShubhamSingh-ie7fb
      @ShubhamSingh-ie7fb 6 років тому +2

      Hey bro but his information about gita is inappropriate as he say arjun was weak fighter and lost the theme there.
      Because he was the best fighter but become weak to fight against his beloved and respected relatives and gurus
      Bhagwat gita is far more better knowledge concepts
      it says "time determines the way of living or course" (i.e. religion)
      Or change/adapt according to time don't stick to it.

    • @pax4370
      @pax4370 6 років тому

      Yeah i love nepal. Hindu n budhhism thrived together in encient india in afganisthan....it was different from the relation between abrahamic relegions

  • @whysoblahsphemous
    @whysoblahsphemous 4 роки тому +150

    Correction : The Mahabharata is the legend of two warring Clans and not to two Kingdoms. The two clans of the Pandavas and the Kauravas who belonged to the same family tree.
    The caste system as we know it is not Hinduism. If one has read the Bhagavad Gita or the Vedas then they will know that movement between castes was not an issue. So for example, if Arjun had happened to display the qualities of a really good baker and a really bad warrior in training, Dron Acharya his mentor would've immediately recommended to him the benefits of changing caste. But Arjun, for those who don't know, is known to be one of the most skilled shooters in ancient history, whom none but the gods could rival and so Krishna sought to remind him his duty when his determination faltered at warring with his family. Without reading the Mahabharata one will not know the context of Gita in it's entirety.
    It was later on in something BC when a Brahmin priest called Manu (who I think was one of the greatest assholes in history) wrote this trash called the Manusmriti. Two things he wrote in it and actively propagated created the rigid caste hierarchy of today-- that Brahmins were Lords of all castes and there would be no more movement among castes so it's pretty clear why he did this. The man was a misogynistic tyrant and I wish he'd never been born.

  • @willch.2259
    @willch.2259 4 роки тому +54

    "They call it Snakes and Ladders" so does the UK. Source: me.

  • @agnikiruphacs
    @agnikiruphacs 8 років тому +48

    Why do so many people comment about his accent and mispronunciation!!!! I'm sure none of us get accents of other countries right!

  • @Coldyham
    @Coldyham 8 років тому +308

    'Chutes and Ladders'? I've never seen it as anything other than snakes and ladders. Must be another USA thing

    • @rileybanks1191
      @rileybanks1191 8 років тому +1

      +

    • @paradoxclash1498
      @paradoxclash1498 8 років тому +11

      We have both here

    • @pjshaw4797
      @pjshaw4797 7 років тому +35

      sneks are far too dangerous for our young 'uns, like kinder surprises

    • @wolv0223
      @wolv0223 7 років тому +10

      It is. Though, personally, Snakes and Ladders raises the stakes for your peice.

    • @musaaawada2019
      @musaaawada2019 6 років тому +13

      yeah right, I play eels and escalators. must be yet ANOTHER terrestrial thing. Ugh.

  • @arnold12345romo
    @arnold12345romo 4 роки тому +191

    i forgot how much ap students love mentioning that they're ap. good ol' highschool days.
    i hated every single moment

  • @owaisali124
    @owaisali124 4 роки тому +25

    Best line of the video: i dont want to play a game that reminds me how a universe is random, capricious, arbitrary and cold, i want to play games so that i can forget what the universe is like.

  • @fratertenc7589
    @fratertenc7589 9 років тому +302

    In the West we very much honor the philosophies and ways of the ancient Greeks and have a Judeo-Christian (mostly Jewish) idea of justice and such.
    Basically we're Jewish furniture in a Greek house or vice versa, as it was once said.
    Indian people actually have their own systems of logic, their own mathematics systems, and a really rich system of philosophy which often gets overlooked. I recommend a book called 'A Sourcebook on Indian Philosophy'.. either on or of, actually I can't recall because it's not with me atm. Not to mention the Chinese book the Tao Te Ching which outlines a much more sensible way of life and worldview than any Abrahamic faith could ever aspire to achieve. That's my opinion, anyway.

    • @GauravJhaGJ
      @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +7

      Frater Tenc Big hands to diversity. *Thumbs up*

    • @jasonivancontreras9340
      @jasonivancontreras9340 9 років тому +6

      Oh shut the fuck up already you paranoid hindu

    • @GauravJhaGJ
      @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +24

      Ivan Contreras If you don't already know:
      "Greeks were descendants of Vedic-Aryan Civilization". Vedic-Civilization was based on Hinduism. What's your problems?

    • @jasonivancontreras9340
      @jasonivancontreras9340 9 років тому +8

      Kr. Gaurav Jha Lol no, the Greeks were not descendents of Indo-Aryans. Both were descended from Indo-Europeans, who originated perhaps in the Black Sea region or West Asia.

    • @GauravJhaGJ
      @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +40

      Ivan Contreras That was the notion in 18th century. With current research in 21st century based on Archaeological, satellite Imagery and DNA Mapping evidence have rejected the "Aryan Invasion theory".
      Homeland of Aryans were in Greater-India (Present day Iran) near Indus Valley civilization.
      Correlations ca be drawn because Greek culture shares almost same gods and deities as Vedic Culture and Vedic-Sanskrit is the oldest known language of Indo-European family.

  • @default_user_name
    @default_user_name 8 років тому +262

    'Buddha' doesn't mean 'teacher' it means 'awakened.'

    • @hoodwinkedagain
      @hoodwinkedagain 8 років тому +4

      +Jason Steele You Dumb. Also called Gautama. (Prince Siddhāttha or Siddhartha) 566?-c480 B.C., Indian religious leader: founder of Buddhism. 2. any of a series of teachers in Buddhism, bringing enlightenment and wisdom. 3. (sometimes l.c.) a Buddhist who has attained full prajna, or Enlightenment; Arhat.

    • @dark-xr9jr
      @dark-xr9jr 8 років тому

      saw it in 'The Power of Now', Buddha-Awakened.

    • @raul45612
      @raul45612 8 років тому +1

      Gautama was one of many buddha's.

    • @MahiMajo
      @MahiMajo 8 років тому +3

      +raul45612 generally, buddhas are referred to as the monks sometimes, however prince siddhartha was THE BUDDHA. He achieved enlightenment and consequently ended the resurrection of his life forever.

    • @BryanGlosemeyer
      @BryanGlosemeyer 8 років тому +2

      I was just about to leave the same comment.

  • @anisa7591
    @anisa7591 5 років тому +608

    Send prayers for those who are taking AP Exam

    • @samanthawommack9079
      @samanthawommack9079 5 років тому +1

      Anisa Mincy I want to cry rn

    • @milliern
      @milliern 5 років тому +6

      If you are watching John Green when you should be preparing for the AP, then I think you took a wrong turn at Albuquerque.

    • @anisa7591
      @anisa7591 5 років тому +6

      David Milliern ummm
      John Green is amazing and watching his videos helped me with my test

    • @milliern
      @milliern 5 років тому +2

      @@anisa7591, "fun" is probably what you mean by "amazing." I'm sure you got what you deserved on your AP test, if this was your primary mode of "study."

    • @lizabeththemoonwitch336
      @lizabeththemoonwitch336 5 років тому +3

      I am god I bless all of you on your exams good luck

  • @ChamupathyWick
    @ChamupathyWick 5 років тому +73

    As a Buddhist I must say that there are highly inaccurate bits of info here particularly regarding Buddhism but I still enjoyed it. And emphasize more on emperor Ashoka who was without any arguement THE best monarch this world has ever seen in terms of his kindness, affection and care for his subjects.

    • @chooinkquimp484
      @chooinkquimp484 4 роки тому +6

      Ashoka was tyrant and he killed Jain ajivikas when he converted into Buddhist as his father bindusar was Jain and he was also not secular he made Buddhism his state religion and there are many accounts where it is written that Ashoka converted to Buddhism before kalinga war.

    • @bullrun2772
      @bullrun2772 4 роки тому

      disagree

    • @alokbaluni8760
      @alokbaluni8760 4 роки тому +1

      Ashoka killed many innocent lives

    • @bullrun2772
      @bullrun2772 4 роки тому

      Illuminati Israel maybe but who is worse then is the angel of death

    • @adamplentl5588
      @adamplentl5588 4 роки тому

      No such thing as a good monarch.

  • @vibhavdeshpande8196
    @vibhavdeshpande8196 7 років тому +224

    Krishna does not tell Arjun to fight because he is born kshatriya but because he is a kshatriya. So he does not tell him to fight even if he is bad at it. In fact Bhagavad-Gita talks about Gunas (qualities) which decide your dharma. Nowhere within the Vedas it is said that varna (misinterpreted as caste) is decided by birth. I am displeased at how he portrayed caste system as important part of Hinduism. Also a shudra is as close to achieving Moksha as a Brahmin and not less.

    • @ankita7342
      @ankita7342 5 років тому +3

      True. It bothered me.

    • @deadalpeca8099
      @deadalpeca8099 5 років тому

      True

    • @thelastcube.
      @thelastcube. 5 років тому +11

      Indian mythology is real complicated man

    • @siddharthroy189
      @siddharthroy189 5 років тому +17

      Very true . Almost all renowned mythical scholars are of so called 'low origin' . Veda vyasa author of the mahabharat and the person who divided the vedas into 4 parts was the son of a fisher woman (satyavati and sage parashar) , valmiki author of the Ramayan was a low caste bandit named Ratnakar, but then he changed and got educated and composed the Ramayan . These are the greatest examples which show that varna (wrongly called caste) is not decided by birth .

    • @sudhagupta4893
      @sudhagupta4893 5 років тому +10

      But we still had untouchability somehow.

  • @GauravJhaGJ
    @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +109

    I would like to make a correction:
    (Please check other websites and encyclopedias to confirm my following two claims)
    At 02:40 Caste is not defined by "Birth". Class system is religiously defined as a person's professional identity by "Choice" and "Skills"; but due to the lack of job switching opportunities during 1000 BCE, caste system became pretty much a part of a person's professional identity by birth.
    At 01:10 Aryan Migration Theory has been debunked and profen false with archaeological prove. Hinduism is indigenous part of Indian culture.

    • @ak220880
      @ak220880 9 років тому +13

      Kr. Gaurav Jha why u need to speak when u dont know anything.
      gita says dont change ur job irrespective of ur capabilities. thats mean caste or varna is by birth. Even if it is not by birth, even than it is very bad system, slavery is bad irrespective of mobility.
      "aryan migration theory" has been proved by dna studies, go do some real search or read in wikipedia for reference, do not trust politicians and religious ppl too much.

    • @GauravJhaGJ
      @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +25

      You've misleading Info:
      1. Gita says, Don't change your duties until you full-fill the commitments. If you committed something to someone, you are bound by duty.
      2. As far as caste system is concerned, its distribution of work with its dignity. I've read English translation of most of the major Vedic scriptures but I didn't find any correlation between Varna and hereditary birth. Its unfortunate that people now categorize on the basis of birth.
      2. Well, "Aryan Invasion Theory" AIT had been proven false.
      As far as "Aryan Migration theory" AMT is concerned, there are several migration from europe to India and India to Europe.
      So, Aryan's Homeland is believed to be modern day Afghanistan-Pakistan Border--We(Indians) agree with it as it is the Indus-Valley, Civilization.

    • @ak220880
      @ak220880 9 років тому +1

      Kr. Gaurav Jha
      Truth is not misleading
      1. no, such thing, ur only making baseless excuses. It just says dont change ur job, irrespective of capabilities.
      2. castes r inescapable side-effects of varna system. Historical accounts r also evidence. In purush sukta, they says ppl come out from that lowly creature purusha in form of varna (ppl born with varna or caste), so common sense says it is also talking about birth based castes, although u can make 1000 excuses just to deny truth. wat dignity. There is no dignity in 3rd class varna system, even if it is not based on birth. Veda seems to be created by beggars and criminals & robers for easy money and food and control. It is bcoz of this bad system, society had become corrupt criminalized weaken and India successfully invaded for last 1000 years.
      3. So, u finally agreed that Aryan migration is fact.
      No, not afganistan. their homeland is middle east and central asia & eastern europe. Aryan migration is fact, without detailed written account, it can not be said that those migration accompanied invasions or not. I guess, there wud have been some minor invasions or fights along the migration, though not as large scale as AIT says.

    • @GauravJhaGJ
      @GauravJhaGJ 9 років тому +4

      ak220880
      The topic you are concerned about in point 1 and point 2 is very much the basic philosophy of Gita i.e. Duties.
      1. I would encourage you to read this Answer on Quora to clear your misunderstanding on why it is important to stay honest to your duties and commitments: www.quora.com/How-feasible-is-the-Bhagvad-Geetas-teaching-of-not-dwelling-on-the-fruits-of-labor-in-todays-world/answer/Balaji-Viswanathan-2
      2. I'm quoting following paragraph from here:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Hinduism
      *The true essence of caste system was not by ones birth or by one's parents inheritance but by one's acts or by profession/heredity.[9] i.e. A Shudra can become a Brahmin (Example: Valmiki who wrote Ramayana), or Kshatriya can become Brahmin (Example: Vishwamitra, by whose grand son's name Bharata, India was named as Bharata centuries ago), or Kshatriya can become Shudra or Vaishya or vice versa. Which actually happened in a well known person born in Shudra family is called as Brahmin due to his profession of writing some highly scholarly writings.
      Later, after the British colonization of India, the caste system was legally established.[10] The land policy created new class of landlords, drove millions into the ranks of tenants and agricultural labors.[11] Even though caste was actually based on one's deeds or works, afterwards it was generalized by birth.*
      3. This is an extensive subject. I write about it on my Quora-blog which I use as an evidence from religious records institute to update wikipedia.
      Read more on my Blog- G.Jha.me/Quora

    • @ak220880
      @ak220880 9 років тому +1

      Kr. Gaurav Jha
      wat u were thinking i was taling about flying alien? i was talking about gita only.
      1. r u mad. who is talking about honesty towards duty or not here. dont try to make excuse. i said gita only talk about not changing jobs irrespective of capabilities, there is no discussion of honesty there. Infact there is no wisdom in gita. Dont use baseless made up stories to satisfy ur wish. and i have read all the baseless apologies of those 3rd hand unauthenticated websites. so, dont give me link of such sites.
      2. lol. wikipedia is just sets of claims. it talks both ways. u need to properly verify that which claim is more logical and to the facts. wat i said is the route of the things. and ur talking about me other peripheral claims.
      Ya, ppl sometimes did not followed veda strictly. some criminals also become brahmins from Indians. traitors and criminals r found in all societies & cultures.
      lol, u soon will claim that veda and gira was also written by british. hahha. go read real history, stop reading recently written myths. ramayan and mahabharat r ever changing documents, u can not depend on them.
      3. i dont have interset in ur stories & websites. even wikipedia talks about aryan migration and says they r not related with indus culture, but u can pick some weak claims in it to misquoting it.

  • @heatherwrench231
    @heatherwrench231 4 роки тому +8

    I don't know about anyone else but I really love this video because you can tell that John is genuinely having a good time in it and so are the editors and people behind the scenes. Episodes like this one are why I love Crash Course so much because John is having a good time with what he does and that's all I want to teach my students. History can be fun and silly and gross and you can have a good time, you just have to have the right attitude about it. Thank you John and your entire team for everything you do to try and make learning easy and fun. I appreciated it as a teen and I appreciate it so much more now as a teacher.

  • @YukihyoShiraki
    @YukihyoShiraki 5 років тому +4

    It's so interesting, the Buddhism I was raised with told the story of buddha and taught a version of the 8 fold path but i mostly remember reciting the golden chain of love and a lot of the core tennants were lost on me as a child.

  • @LeahMarkum
    @LeahMarkum 9 років тому +6

    Pure gold in the comments section. I love it when (for the lack of better terms) the insiders/natives criticize the informational bias and explain the topic from their perspective. This video follows closely to most standard textbooks, yet as John states at the beginning, there is significant historical bias involved because the British, not the Indians, wrote the version of Indian history that many Western cultures know. Depending on the school and the teacher, one's education may not involve thinking critically about or debating content and the source of the content. Yet the diverse audience watching this video has created a complementary educational experience in the comments. Just awesome.

  • @ankushmenat
    @ankushmenat 8 років тому +475

    John you pronounced 90% of Indian things in completely wrong and funny manner :p

    • @arjunkashyap1342
      @arjunkashyap1342 8 років тому +4

      yep

    • @Keepedia99
      @Keepedia99 8 років тому +65

      Meh, we occasionally make a beautiful mess of pronouncing western things too.
      I applaud John for trying to say kshatrya right.
      Just kidding, hilarious! x'D

    • @UltimateBreloom
      @UltimateBreloom 8 років тому +5

      I'll remind you that that's his thing.

    • @Keepedia99
      @Keepedia99 8 років тому +1

      +UltimateBreloom In his defense, John only starts saying that a few episodes later.

    • @UltimateBreloom
      @UltimateBreloom 8 років тому +2

      Keerthana Gurushankar That's why I reminded them. ;)

  • @kylehall8760
    @kylehall8760 7 років тому +12

    "I don't want to say he's not my intellectual equal, but I'm potty trained." Best line of the whole video. Cracked me up.

  • @andromedafrigga7653
    @andromedafrigga7653 6 років тому +20

    “I don’t want to play games that are like the universe”
    I feel this hahaha!!!

  • @randomwanderer311
    @randomwanderer311 10 років тому +45

    The greatest misunderstanding about hinduism is the caste system. You got the basics right but here is to understand it in more detail. During the vedas it was considered that there were 4 routes to power: Knowledge, weapons, wealth and land. The Vedas had decided that one person can only take one of these routes. There is where the castes came along. Bhramins were people who learned knowledge, they could not posses wealth, weapons or land. Even today there are many bramins who go around teaching and survive on donations. Kshatriyas were warriors who learned to use a weapon. Vaishas are traders so had wealth, and finally the sudras who could possess land. This kind of system meant that if you as a warrior who has just conquered new land wanted to make policy had to consult a bhramin,
    When it first started off the caste system was not rigid, that meant if a child born could choose what they wanted to be. It was treated more like professions. Later on it become more rigid and hereditary.

    • @meshzy13
      @meshzy13 10 років тому +9

      You said right. The caste system is not enforced, you make your own choice.

  • @FrankenKitteh
    @FrankenKitteh 8 років тому +89

    1. It took longer than a month for Buddha to attain enlightenment - more like 6 years. Prior to this he gave up asceticism and preached a "middle way" approach. Not starving oneself unnecessarily, not indulging unnecessarily.
    2. Nirvana is different to "full-enlightenment", Kurt Cobain was a genius.
    3. Buddha saw the true nature of reality (much like quantum physicists are trying to do now) not "the meaning of life".
    4. This presentation of the Four Noble Truths is based on the Theravada path, the second and third noble truths are far more complicated that simply rejecting desire.
    8. There is much more to the Buddhist path than just the Eightfold Noble Path, including the Tripitaka of the Pali Canon, and the Bodhisattva training of the Mahayana and Vajrayana paths.
    5. Again this is very much based on the Theravada version of Buddhism - the more "fun" versions of Buddhism are also based completely on Buddha's teachings with direct links to His words. Even Theravadin Buddhists have rituals and they also have fun :) The misconception of Buddhists being depressed and repressed is damaging to Buddhism. We have a lot of fun.
    I have been a Buddhist for 20 years. Of course John couldn't fit it all in, nice try.

    • @zhixuanchen6914
      @zhixuanchen6914 6 років тому +1

      Thubten Yeshe thanks for your in-depth clarification, as the video is pretty misleading despite having shown some facts.

    • @acesecus
      @acesecus 6 років тому +3

      the "fun" versions of buddhism such as, Mahayana and Zen Buddhism are not the true way of Buddha's teachings. Theravada Buddhism is 100% of Buddha's teachings and sticks to his principles. Theravada Buddhists have "fun" depends on that conception, we can have fun but not things not wanted by the Buddha and his principles, such as, 1. Don't Drink (Don't Drink Massive amounts of alcohol like a Alcoholic/Drunker) 2. Don't Kill 3. Don't Steal 4. Don't Cheat on your Spouse 5. Don't Lie. Also don't Gamble, but that wasn't apart of the 5 Thing To Keep, but Gambling isn't good either, because it can lead to addiction and Desire. Also when you obtain "Full-Enlightment" you can go to Nirvana any time, you get the feeling of mass peacefulness, so after you die with Full-Enlightment, you go to Nirvana, many monks who obtained Enlightenment were Arahats, one difference between Them and Buddha was Buddha learned all of this teachings by himself, and then he taught the end to recarnation to everyone else.

    • @bullrun2772
      @bullrun2772 4 роки тому

      Wrong about Buddha thing

    • @bullrun2772
      @bullrun2772 4 роки тому

      and he never says that gosh and whatever that text said is probably biased

    • @bullrun2772
      @bullrun2772 4 роки тому

      Thubten Yeshe all your points are rubbish because where you get 6 years from those aniecnt alien thoery or just some stupid thoery because I disagree and never heard that from other poeple

  • @matthewwahlstrom
    @matthewwahlstrom 5 років тому +1

    Wow, this is the first time I have seen one of your videos! Brilliant work! Extremely entertaining and informative! This channel is super rad! Thank you for this video and for doing what you do! 🙏🏻

  • @samrata9551
    @samrata9551 6 років тому +38

    Dharma means set of rules values virtues to be followed for right living

  • @BlooCowz
    @BlooCowz 10 років тому +31

    Hinduism is so flexible now you can basically be Hindu if you believe there is some divine power

    • @praharshdixit
      @praharshdixit 10 років тому

      Not judging you, but unlike European history (Zeus, Sun,... god of power, victory, etc.) Hindu believe in making fear of God in minds of people so that they carry on with good works. :)

    • @BlooCowz
      @BlooCowz 10 років тому +23

      praharsh dixit Isn't that what most religions do ;)

    • @CasualGraph
      @CasualGraph 10 років тому +3

      Well, actually, if I remember correctly, that's not the case in a lot of... cases? Take, for example, the greek gods. I get the sense that they weren't meant to provide an encouraging force toward good acts , but rather to give hope to people who's lives were chaotic. For instance imagine the grieving wife of a fisherman asking "why did my husband die at sea?" The response here, if I remember correctly, would be "because he was impious and irritated Poseidon." Therefor, the gods were used, rather than for encouraging good acts (which I haven't heard of any Greek god ever being in favor of) to encourage a belief that by some acts one can make their life better. Heck, if I remember correctly in Norse mythology you go to Valhalla just for being a good warrior (although battles' victors were also decided by the gods, so I imagine Valhalla was filled with a bunch of people doing nothing than drinking wine and praising Odin.). In the case of Hinduism, which I know almost nothing about, the religion was flexible only to the point of letting other beliefs in, not letting their core beliefs of reincarnation and such out. Therefor, if you want to be technical, being Hindu didn't only include a belief in some divine power, it also involved accepting your place in society in hopes of getting to a better one. In fact, looking at it, the idea of good works bringing you to heaven seems like a relatively new idea. There are very few cases in which people are rewarded in the afterlife for being particularly good people.

    • @BlooCowz
      @BlooCowz 10 років тому

      Unhidden Polymath Key word "involvED" Now it's extremely flexible. It can be practiced as a religion, or as values

    • @CasualGraph
      @CasualGraph 10 років тому +2

      Mikkloud~AMVs
      Well, that definition is a bit dicey. Hinduism, by definition, is necessarily defined as a religion, meaning that to be Hindu is to believe in the gods and what all. If you want to take the core values and beliefs, quite possibly what it was like when it began, then it ceases to be what is defined as Hinduism. At that point it just becomes following a philosophy, or bare bones theology, and not a definite religion.

  • @RandomGuy12562
    @RandomGuy12562 8 років тому +41

    "I dont want to say he's not my intellectual equal.........but i'm potty trained"
    hilarious!

  • @ramirosalinas2981
    @ramirosalinas2981 5 років тому +1

    Man i have always been into history its my favorite. Thank yall for makin this channel! i absolutley love it and you guys!!

  • @martind5653
    @martind5653 5 років тому +122

    Teacher: We don't have much time for whole Indian thing, only ten minutes so let's make it counts.
    Also teacher: Proceed to face his childhood trauma from Snakes and Ladder for about two minutes.

  • @risingsun08107
    @risingsun08107 9 років тому +220

    Instead of playing golf and talking about snakes and ladders, you could have talked a little more about Siddhartha's 8-Fold Path

    • @BWBGaming1
      @BWBGaming1 8 років тому +24

      Go read your textbook

    • @susannahhabecker866
      @susannahhabecker866 8 років тому +3

      +risingsun08107 you seem to already be on top of that

    • @risingsun08107
      @risingsun08107 8 років тому +29

      BWBGaming1 we came here so that we didn't have to read a textbook.
      he said he didn't have time for details of siddhartha's philosophy, but he did make time to show us himself playing golf and talking about board game.

    • @navyachintaman1614
      @navyachintaman1614 8 років тому +17

      +risingsun08107 I agree. But, if you would like to know, those 8 that were mentioned, (Right understanding, Right thought, Right Speech, Right Action, Right livelihood, Right effort, Right mindfulness, and Right concentration) were the 8 parts of the path (The 8-Fold Path) to achieve Nirvana. Nirvana is to be freed from the horrible cycle of life, death and rebirth. The purpose of the 8-Fold path was to follow it and be free from worldly suffering (You know, desires and hopes) and achieve a state of peace. (Nirvana) He spread this to many people in hopes to teach them this path to save the world from pain and struggle. It flourished in India (Along with the help of Emperor Ashoka, who famously converted to Buddhism.)... But in the Medieval Period, Buddhism faded away in India, although it was preserved in the rest of Asia. It is now the dominant religion of Japan, Burma, Sri Lanka and many others.
      Although this was a bit choppy, hope this helped!

    • @LoveBilboBiscuit
      @LoveBilboBiscuit 7 років тому +7

      He has to break up some of the history to keep it interesting. The purpose of this series is to make videos that teach you as much info as possible in a short time while keeping it interesting, and to give a quick overview of some things you need to know (as a bridge to do more research if you are interested in a particular topic). I know in the United States these videos are used very often as review sessions in the classroom, so they keep it interesting and funny while still presenting important information. Otherwise, you may as well watch a short documentary, which may be more informative but presented in a less intriguing manner.

  • @abhinavrakesh108
    @abhinavrakesh108 10 років тому +47

    i come from india and what he said about india's caste system is completely 100% wrong!!!!

    • @FlibertTheEpic
      @FlibertTheEpic 10 років тому +34

      Not to incite a flame-war but i would appreciate being told what he said that was wrong.

    • @jor3511
      @jor3511 10 років тому +19

      he was attempting to explain the caste system in a short amount of time, and simplistic enough so that students would be able to understand the basics. it would take years to explain every aspect of the indian caste system. this is how they teach it in America, and it cannot possibly be 100% wrong, or else they wouldn't teach it.

    • @abhinavrakesh108
      @abhinavrakesh108 10 років тому +18

      jordan nevin what he said about moksha is correct.......but he is wrong about the caste system.......in reality caste comes from karma(in ancient india) and not by birth.....if son of a brahmana possesses the quality of a warrior for protection of his motherland then he can become a kshatriya(pronounced as "shatriya" and not "kashatriya")......and people from the lower caste converting to budhism did not occur in ancient india...it basically started just 50 years ago!!!

    • @abhinavrakesh108
      @abhinavrakesh108 10 років тому +13

      jordan nevin and btw caste system has not brought unity but has actually divided people in the indian sub continent.......

    • @charlesstockings663
      @charlesstockings663 10 років тому +20

      I've been watching a lot of "Crash Course World History" and a lot of what he says is just wrong. but it is only a ten minute video so can't be perfect.
      P.s "buddha" doesn't mean "teacher", it means "enlightened one" if all my Buddhist teachers are correct. and i believe them over this guy because they are Buddhist.

  • @movingparts6270
    @movingparts6270 4 роки тому +17

    His son is now almost old enough to be watching these videos for school

  • @urbansocrates
    @urbansocrates 5 років тому +1

    Thanks, John. Your videos have been so helpful.

  • @tantie4292
    @tantie4292 7 років тому +48

    Buddha means "the enlighten one"

  • @lobzangwangtak
    @lobzangwangtak 8 років тому +124

    Did I just hear that the Buddha meditated for a month and entered Nirvana? As far as I know he meditated for 6 years.

    • @christro6156
      @christro6156 8 років тому

      +Ind-Abhishek I like your profile pic :3

    • @christro6156
      @christro6156 8 років тому

      +Ind-Abhishek I know :3 greatest band ever!!

    • @adithatai7428
      @adithatai7428 8 років тому +1

      +l- zee wang No actually he only meditated under that one tree for 1 month

    • @lobzangwangtak
      @lobzangwangtak 8 років тому

      okay, I didn't know that, thanks.

    • @dilhanfonseka
      @dilhanfonseka 8 років тому +1

      +l- zee wang actualy it is 6 years

  • @noaht7677
    @noaht7677 5 років тому +135

    Casually going through every one of these to study for Ap World Exam

  • @hynterd
    @hynterd 6 років тому

    This is great for a senior level history class im in and I also watched this in HS. yall are incredible

  • @Mysillyresponses
    @Mysillyresponses 10 років тому +12

    John I have been watching you and your brother for years. I just found this channel and subscribed. I am watching all of the history vids from the beginning.. I am proud of you and Hank and the community you have brought together

    • @WanderingAccident
      @WanderingAccident 10 років тому +1

      Yes, this is a pretty incredible thing. I want to see it expand.

  • @heathi51
    @heathi51 9 років тому +13

    something even more significant about that section of the mahabharata is that the soldier who is experiencing the conflict is conflicted because he realizes he will have to fight and possibly kill his *family* (father, brothers) and krishna is literally telling him that his caste duty (dharma) is more important that familial allegiances

    • @KarateShotokanKid1
      @KarateShotokanKid1 9 років тому +10

      Not just his caste duty. The Kauravas were the bad guys. They tried to kill Arjuna's sibling Bheema when he was young, humiliated his mother in public etc. Here, they were shoulders-deep in war with each other. Arjuna, one of the best marksmen in his army almost got cold feet because the enemy were his brothers and teacher. Then, Krishna had to tell him that he owed this to his good brothers fighting beside him,to his mother, morality and all else.

    • @heathi51
      @heathi51 9 років тому +3

      thanks for the additional info!

    • @jedimaster9922
      @jedimaster9922 9 років тому +1

      Caste and dharma are different.There is no such things as caste duty.Dharma in this case is righteousness.It also means religion.It also means just duty.

    • @BallyBoy95
      @BallyBoy95 9 років тому +5

      Heather Gluck No, you misunderstand. I'm an atheist, but strongly adore Hinduism, researched Asia (particularly the Indian subcontient) all my life, let me help you.
      I'll make this short and snappy. Arjun was one of the five Pandava brothers.
      These 5 pandava brothers ruled the whole of India. And in Indian culture, family is most important. You can even see it in Bollywood movies, and Indian television, EVERY movie has love/romance, and EVERY show has family dramas, and relations.
      The Mahabharat, states that his four brothers became power-hungry, and tyrants, Karna for instance, raped Draupati, who was the wife of the five Pandava brothers (Hindu culture is very tolerant, one man could have multiple wives, and one wife could have multiple husbands like Draupati did, and I DO NOT mean concubines, I mean actual, legitimate wives).
      So Arjun is about to begin the war, but then wants to chicken out, and states I cannot kill my brothers, they helped me so much, I cannot kill my father, without him, I would not be here, I could not kill this Brahmin, he taught me everything I know, without him, I would not even be able to read/write or speak Sanskrit.
      He cannot kill these soldiers, they are honest men, who fight selflessly, and have wives/children to care for.
      Krishna tells him, he has a duty as king, to do what is best for his people, the duty of a king/warrior (Kshatriya Dharma). He sings one of the longest and most ancient poems in human history, the Bhagavad Gita. Telling him the ethics of war. Not to use poison (causes unnecessary pain).
      He tells him that the war is necessary, otherwise India (Bharat in Sanskrit) will have a very sad future, full of tyrannical rule, and suffering. This motivates Arjun to continue the war.
      Like, another part of this poem states, what shall he do to the criminals? Krishna asks him what does he think should happen? Arjun says he should remove them from society from which they have taken a lot from (committing crimes) by killing them. Krishna tells him that by killing the criminal, you will also kill his mother/father/brother/sister/son/daughter, his whole family will die. Instead, take him prisoner, that will segregate him from causing anymore harm to society, but his relatives will be able to visit him when they wish.
      Already, he abolishes the death penalty. The Hindu culture is marvellous. It has pacifism/vegetarianism (ahimsa)/duty (dharma)/peace (moksha)/freedom of speech (nastashastra)/how a king should rule (arthashastra) etc. etc.

    • @Chuschannel
      @Chuschannel 9 років тому +3

      Bruce Wayne I know your secret identity. Give me 1 million dollars and I will not reveal it to the public.

  • @SatyamKumar-px1ch
    @SatyamKumar-px1ch 4 роки тому +14

    Ashoka was born in magadha.... My homeland❤️😅

  • @ramrai2642
    @ramrai2642 5 років тому

    This is McDonald for learning, it difficult to find more shallow articulation of the Eastern thoughts, thank you for the effort anyway quick Guru.

  • @amitparikh9223
    @amitparikh9223 8 років тому +25

    Concept of Dharma is to fulfill your duties in a righteous way, it does not mean if you are born a Kshatriya and you are worlds best baker go to battle field and fight till you die.

  • @nizzy1999
    @nizzy1999 8 років тому +11

    5:37, the prophecy said that gautam would either become the greatest king who ever ruled, or an asthetic who'd denounce the kingdom and live his life as a sage. Obviously, gautam's parents didnt want him to leave, so they kept him inside the palace and showered him with luxurious stuff in hopes that he'd get used to the life in a palace and not leave

  • @benthomas8312
    @benthomas8312 7 років тому

    This man helped me pass my AP. It works so much guys and girls, keep watching.

  • @eliseerickson5994
    @eliseerickson5994 5 років тому +4

    John Green: Indian History is so complex too bad we only have 10 minutes
    John Green: spends literally a full minute talking about shoots and ladders and his son

  • @hindurashtra63
    @hindurashtra63 7 років тому +35

    India has such great History and Emperors.. Ashoka was a Ruthless Emperor who had slaughtered 90 of his own siblings (From various mothers) for Power. His wars resulted in killing of almost a quarter of Million people. He got even the little babies of his brothers executed, One such kid became a Buddhist monk later in his life and happened to visit the king begging for Food (Buddhist monks supposedly called - "Bhikshu" went begging for food those days), While Ashoka's own children lived in luxury.
    Ashoka was heartbroken that his nephew who was supposed to live like an Emperor was now a beggar, because of him. He asked him to forgive him and said he would adopt him, But the Nephew laughed and said - "What use are these Palaces and Riches when I have embraced something even greater", This was the Philosophy of "Buddhism", Which soon Ashoka learned about.
    Since then, He accepted Buddhism and began to rule like a Kind and Merciful Emperor. His Great kingdom extend from Indonesia to Afghanistan. He lessened the harsh punishments to Criminals, Banned torture of animals, Established human and animal rights in a historical document and sought peace. All Wars were to be banned and he sent the message of Buddha through his navy all across South East Asia which would eventually find its way to China, Japan and beyond..
    It was said that before death, The only posessions he had with him were his clothes. He died a Beggar, Donating everything he had (His Piles of Gold, Palaces, Wealth, Royal Jewelry) he had to Charity and for his people..

    • @dawnfm00
      @dawnfm00 6 років тому +7

      What is the source of this? this is distortion of history.

    • @jayasuryangoral-maanyan3901
      @jayasuryangoral-maanyan3901 5 років тому

      He definitely didn't rule Indonesia, he didn't even directly rule over the south of india.
      Unless you mean he had tributaries in Indonesia then we might be having an issue with translation here

  • @safa9408
    @safa9408 7 років тому +735

    Anyone one else taking ap world history and are internally dead?

    • @noahworsham4325
      @noahworsham4325 7 років тому

      Same.

    • @belladentler257
      @belladentler257 7 років тому +1

      I got you

    • @thechocolat3p33ps6
      @thechocolat3p33ps6 7 років тому

      Same

    • @CMonroe42
      @CMonroe42 7 років тому

      Safa H I took it last year now I'm taking world which is more interesting and engaging but is twice as hard as AP US History

    • @suppasolosis
      @suppasolosis 7 років тому +1

      nobody was talking about ap us history

  • @NicoSan805
    @NicoSan805 6 років тому +3

    "I want to play games to forget what the universe is like." John Green
    Excapism...I remember it once. Life is a game & were all pawns. To be or not to be?

  • @DeptalJexus
    @DeptalJexus 4 роки тому +6

    Poor buddha, he was just trying to show people the path of enlightenment, but the caste system and Hinduism are still alive and well till this day anyway.

  • @sararaba3299
    @sararaba3299 7 років тому +20

    In my world history class, we were taught that Buddha meant "the enlightened one" Now I'm not sure which is correct

    • @ankursooraj
      @ankursooraj 7 років тому +22

      Buddha means "The enlightened one", not Teacher.

  • @newworldoldproblems7585
    @newworldoldproblems7585 7 років тому +38

    An interesting thing about Buddhism is the closer you get to what Gautama Buddha is speculated to have actually said, the less supernatural and 'religious' it is.
    Many religions get less far-fetched with time, but Gautama Buddha was truly a man of great wisdom.

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 7 років тому +7

      It's an atheist religion, actually. Quite ironic, I think.

    • @acesecus
      @acesecus 6 років тому +3

      hmmm..we never believe Buddha was a god, he was just a enlightened being who shared his teachings

    • @acesecus
      @acesecus 6 років тому +1

      How is it ironic? yes, our religion doesn't believe in God. but we're not athetist..we're buddhist lol

    • @PGraveDigger1
      @PGraveDigger1 5 років тому +1

      @@acesecus Not believing in God(s) is what defines atheism. You can be buddhist and atheist at the same time.

    • @mycelia_ow
      @mycelia_ow 5 років тому +3

      @@PGraveDigger1, yes, and the philosophy itself dislikes religious dogma and mystical nonsense.

  • @rizowanahussaini1019
    @rizowanahussaini1019 5 років тому +9

    Really appreciate how much effort John Green put in to get everything right, and I understand the pressure of trying not to offend another culture but call out caste system for what it is - a systemic oppression tactic in order to segment society into clear divisions of who would serve the privileged. The Dalits and Sudras were stripped of their humanity, untouchability was introduced (to the point where even seeing a lower caste or letting their shadow fall on an upper caste was considered impure) and some even had to live outside villages/cities.
    The sad thing is that despite centuries of trying to reform this, caste system has pervaded in our society, where even honour killings are performed if a couple dares to have an inter-caste marriage.

  • @lunaticginger8083
    @lunaticginger8083 5 років тому +207

    AP World Gang, like if you're here for the exam and... haven't... procrastinated at all...

  • @JulenneEsquincaTapia
    @JulenneEsquincaTapia 10 років тому +20

    It's difficult to explain buddhism in such a short time and indeed westerners ignore a lot about it, hopefully interested people could just inform themselves by good references :)

  • @Nikatronixx
    @Nikatronixx 10 років тому +85

    The 'K' is silent in Kshatriya.

    • @saint_matthias
      @saint_matthias 10 років тому +1

      no you fool. K is not silent.

    • @dominicrussell2227
      @dominicrussell2227 10 років тому +24

      DoYoung Choe yes fool, it is

    • @Nikatronixx
      @Nikatronixx 10 років тому +29

      DoYoung Choe I'm Indian and I've studied this in school. So yeah, it is.

    • @harshakotthapalli3835
      @harshakotthapalli3835 10 років тому +15

      Nikatronixx I grew up in south India and this is how I learned to pronounce 'Kshatriya' - Ksha... not Kasha but I still say 'K' - not silent ... might be differently pronounced in other parts of India...

    • @GuitarGuy190
      @GuitarGuy190 10 років тому +3

      Harsha Kotthapalli You're right. The K is pronounced but it's soft. It isn't emphasized at all, just a hint of it before you say the 'sh'.

  • @astro-zodiac
    @astro-zodiac 4 роки тому +4

    Lord Buddha was born in Nepal.

  • @sebastiansanchez6308
    @sebastiansanchez6308 5 років тому

    The rant about chutes and ladders made john green my favorite person ever.

  • @blackholewala
    @blackholewala 8 років тому +10

    You can't talk about Buddhism and Caste system without talking about Dr. Ambedkar. Although, I love your videos. :)

  • @sarban1653
    @sarban1653 8 років тому +7

    Why did he make the video 10 minutes and not 20 minutes? He said he left out a lot of stuff to discuss but made the video only 10 minutes.

  • @firstjkookie186
    @firstjkookie186 4 роки тому +14

    Btw the caste system WAS NOT part of the hindu religion. It was a way for the British to fragment the unity of India by imposing ridiculous rules. India originally had something called the Verma system and that was based on the professions of people ( and they could change) not by the caste system.

    • @ItsAnk4
      @ItsAnk4 4 роки тому +1

      Say that to Karna from Mahabharat 😛

    • @suhanashaikh4730
      @suhanashaikh4730 4 роки тому +3

      Brother chill
      Caste system was always a part of Hindu religion.
      There are still seats reserved for at/ SC section of India. It existed then and all the British did were manipulate th in a way that they felt divides

    • @Freeman-uk2xn
      @Freeman-uk2xn 4 роки тому +1

      @@suhanashaikh4730
      *I am a veteran hindu*
      I think all you are moron stone age gypies, animal eater
      Always narrate wrong thing
      Caste system is a work culture and principle of management
      1. Top level management
      2. Middle level management
      3. Work level management
      4. Low level management
      According to skill possessed and copy same Triangle
      Even a prostitute(skill) given caste of dev dassi
      So indians corrupted it
      But these abrahmics could not understood own religion
      Catholic vs prodestant
      Shia vs sunni
      Lol😂😂😂
      What can we expect from you
      He quoted rig veda correctly
      But mix Mouth chest thiegh leg cleverly
      Lol
      You are mixing manusmiti cleverly with Rig veda...
      We tear manu smiriti ..
      Britishers propagated it
      Have some shame
      What is the caste of *Tulsi Gabbard* a white hindu of america
      😂😂😂😂😂
      So ur propegenda is about to over
      But
      Every chritian must be either catholic vs prod vs orthodox
      Shia vs sunni vs ahmediya vs bla bla bla
      Millions millions dead still dying
      Despite
      1 God
      1 Book
      Hindus are 1
      Despite
      Many Gods
      Many Books
      😇😇😇😇
      Hindus live in Bali Indonesia Malaysia Vietnam
      Ask them their caste 😂😂😂😂

    • @Freeman-uk2xn
      @Freeman-uk2xn 4 роки тому

      @@ItsAnk4
      Son in law of mohamad beheaded by muslims themselves by yelling allahuakber allahuakber Allahuakbwr😂😂
      What is the caste of *Juliya Roberts*
      a white hindu
      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @abhiudayravish4012
    @abhiudayravish4012 5 років тому

    Awesome video thanks I needed this for my project

  • @amrithai.5705
    @amrithai.5705 7 років тому +232

    loll anyone else die at his pronunciations XDD

    • @shrads5730
      @shrads5730 7 років тому +26

      Annabeth Chase me being an Indian found it really funny....😂
      Stoopas!....

    • @Neha71580
      @Neha71580 7 років тому +8

      I know right. I couldn't stop laughing when he said Mahabharata. It's completely fine though, it was definitely not offensive and we could tell he was trying his best XD

    • @riseALK
      @riseALK 7 років тому +6

      Really it's like every fifth person I see here has a K-popper profile pic. How????

    • @amrithai.5705
      @amrithai.5705 7 років тому +4

      ***** you're telling me

    • @aarini1300
      @aarini1300 6 років тому +1

      JUN AND MINGHAO!!

  • @soumyaray7167
    @soumyaray7167 7 років тому +5

    being an Indian I fond your approach towards Hinduism (though I like to call it Bharat-Dharma i.e. the philosophy of India) to be fascinating as you have encapsulated the entire essence of Sanatan Dharma in a funfilled lucid manner.🙏

  • @oliviagenco6634
    @oliviagenco6634 7 років тому +1

    I don't know if anyone reads these but I think you should do a whole crash course series on India. Also, if you did them on different cultures or regions that'd be cool too.

  • @paigehandy9560
    @paigehandy9560 5 років тому

    I really love the position from which y’all present history, and it really makes me wish your videos were 20 minutes and a little more... focused. Definitely trying to appeal to the overly medicated generations.

  • @nidawiiro5710
    @nidawiiro5710 9 років тому +9

    Guys I am Hindu myself. Yes the West do not interpret our religion correctly and have a misunderstanding of it but at the same time this is what is understood by the College Board and historians. In order to do well on this exam we have to use this information otherwise we will get many points off. So just accept this information for the test but otherwise know the real information (our understanding and the true understanding).

    • @thegreatwalrus6574
      @thegreatwalrus6574 9 років тому

      Nidawi Iro It would be interesting to see it from the other way around do Easterners get our religions correctly.

    • @szthercsxrofaudaszx7391
      @szthercsxrofaudaszx7391 9 років тому

      +Brock Fielder Depends. I am a Southeast Asian who knew a lot about Abrahamic Religions, Greek and Scandinavian Mythologies and more. A lot of my friends also had correct views on Western religions. I know this because I immigrated to the West and continued my research on religions because I had an affinity for human spirituality and creativity.

  • @AprilLVideos
    @AprilLVideos 10 років тому +5

    6:19 siddhartha finally understood 42

  • @buttersbeans6929
    @buttersbeans6929 6 років тому +1

    Nirvana means achievment of understanding and happiness and the Nirvana band logo is a smiley face with Xs for eyes... thats deep man

  • @lindsayg9368
    @lindsayg9368 5 років тому +10

    If you see this and you have the exam tomorrow, you've got this, I believe in you, we've come this far already and we're almost done. Doing well in the class was our goal and tomorrow is the icing on the cake. The class taught us about the world and how different societies are similar and different. We learned how to analyze documents and look at history in a deeper way. Tomorrow is just a number and whatever it is, it won't erase the knowledge we've been given. Now go to sleep so you can be well rested and have time to eat a healthy breakfast. Remember to bring snacks and to leave your phone at home; we don't need that distraction. It's showtime!

  • @YashodhanBhale
    @YashodhanBhale 9 років тому +557

    Oh dear God! Why do all western guys have to fail so miserably at understanding Hinduism?
    1. There is a difference between 'Jaati' (caste) system and 'Varna' (class) system.
    2. What they are calling a caste system, is actually a class system.
    3. The division is not vertical, but horizontal. Meaning, Brahman sits beside Kshatriya, not on top of it.
    4. There are only four classes. Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra. 'Harijans' is not a class.
    5. The 'Purush' showed as a god is actually a representation of the society.
    6. Different classes make different body parts of Purusha.
    7. Brahmins (intellectuals) make the head.
    8. Kshatriyas (rulers, law enforcers, armed forces) make the hands.
    9. Vaishyas (businessmen, industrialists) make the torso.
    10. Shudras (skilled and non-skilled workers) make legs.
    11. The system is not rigid, nor related to birth. One can select and change professions freely.
    12. Vaishyas and Shudras are supposed to support Brahmins and Kshatriyas (by money, food, shelter, etc).
    13. Brahmins are supposed to guide (and sometimes, train) other classes in their duties.
    14. This system is universal, even more today. Money makers and workers pay taxes to support schools, universities, R&D, government systems, law enforcement, armed forces, etc.
    15. Krishna was not trying to make Arjuna fight, even when Arjuna was bad at it. In fact, Arjuna is believed to be the best worrier of his time. He was reluctant to fight, because he had to fight is cousins. But as a Kshatriya, it was his duty to fight against evil, not matter who he was fighting against.
    Now about caste system.
    1. Caste system is more recent phenomenon, and a deformation of the original system.
    2. Was it an honest mistake or a deliberate act to create and maintain superiority? We don't know for sure. It could be both.
    3. Though class system is very flexible, a child is naturally more likely to follow his fathers steps.
    4. This natural fact, with some human help gave birth to the caste system.
    5. There are huge number of castes in every class. The castes are usually named after a profession. For example, many caste names can be translated into English as - blacksmith, goldsmith, shepherd, etc.
    6. 'Harijans' were created even later. Communities who were defeated in war and denied converting to Islam were forced to do the "dirty" jobs. It was expected to break their moral.
    Biased take at history, indeed. I hope now the things suddenly start making sense to you.

    • @YashodhanBhale
      @YashodhanBhale 9 років тому +82

      Oh yes, and Buddhism, as it turns out, derives it's philosophy from Hinduism itself. Which makes Buddhist philosophy a tiny part of Hindu philosophy. And hence the easy "integration". Amazing, isn't it?
      BTW, did you know there are 6 major schools of thought in Hinduism, one of which is atheist? That's why you can be an atheist while being a Hindu. Good luck wrapping your head around that.

    • @30hotmale
      @30hotmale 9 років тому +13

      Yashodhan Bhale two out of six actually- Sankhya and Mimamsa

    • @tar21ftw
      @tar21ftw 9 років тому +13

      I hope people read this.

    • @YashodhanBhale
      @YashodhanBhale 9 років тому +73

      sedatedcoho, all present eastern religions - Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, originated from Hinduism. Eastern concept of religion is very different than that of west and middle east, which typically follow Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). In the east, a religion does not mean subscribing to a set of beliefs.
      Hinduism has evolved over the course of history. It is a fascinating story of intellectual studies and debates. The basis of Hinduism is philosophy, and not miracles. As a Hindu, society or government does not interfere in your personal beliefs. Even 5000 years ago, you could shout in a crowded street that you do not believe in God or in afterlife. No one would think of punishing you, or even call you a lesser Hindu. Hinduism is the epitome of secularism.
      Of course, there is much more to tell. Stay curious :)

    • @CountBifford
      @CountBifford 9 років тому +14

      "The system is not rigid, nor related to birth. One can select and change professions freely."
      I don't understand. If one is free to choose one's profession, then why do people say there is a caste system at all? Why are the Dalits complaining of bullying and job discrimination?

  • @satviksoni6764
    @satviksoni6764 8 років тому +164

    The k is silent in Kshatriyas

    • @manasdas8793
      @manasdas8793 8 років тому +49

      it is not silent. "ksh":stands for an entirely different note. not many non indians will be able to prnounce it

    • @satviksoni6764
      @satviksoni6764 8 років тому

      oh is it

    • @charleswey4895
      @charleswey4895 7 років тому +9

      Yes it is, It's a unique syllable or Consonant. However, I am non-Indian and I can pronounce it very well and I can speak Hindi better than most Indians.
      BTW, for Indians from north India, such as Bengali & Gujurati , 'K' is silent whereas through out south India, the 'K' is not silent.

    • @satviksoni6764
      @satviksoni6764 7 років тому

      Charles W Gujarat and bengal aren't technically north indian states

    • @charleswey4895
      @charleswey4895 7 років тому +11

      So what are we debating, the pronunciation of syllable "Ksha" or technically what states is north or south?
      BTW, grammatically it's suppose to be Bengal not bengal.

  • @abewewew
    @abewewew 4 роки тому

    Very nuanced explanations of things

  • @user-ro7bm7bc1k
    @user-ro7bm7bc1k 4 роки тому

    john green
    I just wanna say your books are awesome and I am a total sucker for authors
    hardcore bookworm
    g.s.

  • @islandsunset
    @islandsunset 9 років тому +3

    Buddha was born In Nepal(dominantly Hindu) and attained enlightenment in India.... There are many ppl in Nepal who identifies themselves as both Hindu and Buddhist... and we respect all the religions.

  • @shrads5730
    @shrads5730 7 років тому +21

    Being an Indian,according to me he was almost correct....
    Great work!👍

    • @aryanshrestha6630
      @aryanshrestha6630 6 років тому +2

      Shraddha Singh he forgot to mention that Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal

    • @ShubhamSingh-ie7fb
      @ShubhamSingh-ie7fb 6 років тому +2

      Shraddha Singh Hey yaar but his information about gita is inappropriate as he say arjun was weak fighter and lost the theme there.
      Because he was the best fighter but become weak to fight against his beloved and respected relatives and gurus
      Bhagwat gita is far more better knowledge concepts
      it says "time determines the way of living or course" (i.e. religion)
      Or change/adapt according to time don't stick to it.

  • @SumanSaurabh135
    @SumanSaurabh135 5 років тому +21

    I recently read an article( I read many ) that it is difficult for someone with a different culture to translate the works belonging to another culture(in texts where the cultural knowledge matters, this is particularly the case). This is truer if the other culture in question is markedly different than yours. Your job is tough and you guys really are doing a great work. I'm a fan of you as well as your channel as a whole. You guys have helped me a lot, giving me a gist of many topics.
    But in this video, probably many corrections are required:
    1) As @Vibhav Deshpande Pointed out, Krishna is not telling Arjuna to fight the battle just because he is Kshatriya.. that interpretation of yours is particularly flawed. The ruling class needs to stand for the people and against the injustice even if it means waging war.. and even if the war for dharma demands fighting against one's own kin. This is what the context was. Khsatriya were not just the warriors but were the rulers too and Arjun belonged to the ruling family and hence Krishna is saying, "as a kshatriya it's your dharma to fight this battle..." (Arjuna btw was the best archer in the entire domain in question so Krishna sure was not talking about being a warrior even if Arjuna was bad at it... instead he was urging Arjun to do what he was the best at ). Simply put, Mahabharata is too complex an epic to decipher from a summary and some extracts(because this is too bad an interpretation if you've read the entire text). And Krishna is too Godly a god to have said that. (you need to read more..)
    2) The Caste system of India was initially based on the division of labour and occupation and not birth. So you were classified on the basis of the work you choose. But later it was changed as the privileged ones had the access to the books and they said "Hey why not keep these perks to ourselves" and from here the oppressive caste system was born and has had such an impact(for the worse in most cases).
    3) It wasn't like you had to born each time successively as a shudra then a vaishya then a Khsatriya and then a Brahmin and ultimately with good deeds be salvaged.. instead with good deeds and a balance of various aspects of one's life, freedom from the cycle of birth and death was possible for anyone i.e, people from all walks of life were eligible.
    Indian Mythology and history are very complex probably but I expect better from you. I'm no expert but these mistakes I can clearly point out( talk to some experts if you will). I could excuse 2nd but Flaw 1 and 3 are particularly fatal.
    Hope you remake it!

  • @G4mer_D4d
    @G4mer_D4d 5 років тому

    fun and insightful. super love it.

  • @natando_001
    @natando_001 10 років тому +18

    The part where how Budda was just fasting and meditating until one day he got it was a bit too short. It reflected wrongly the story in which Buddha had failed at first just by starving himself, and only later realized the Middle way (not follow any extremes) was the correct way. And 'Buddha' does not mean 'teacher', it means 'the awakened one', totally different meaning.

  • @asianfrenchguy
    @asianfrenchguy 8 років тому +24

    I thought "Buddha" meant "awakened one"

  • @ditriouxs7720
    @ditriouxs7720 Рік тому

    Im literally watching this because it reminded me of my hs AP history class. These videos were always such a great part of the day