Actually, Marty is 17 years old, and George and Lorraine are 17 years old as well in 1955. The trilogy tended to sort out the characters into three different ages in a spectrum. "17 years, 47 years, and 77 years old." All the ages differ by each other by 30 years since every time travel year differed by each other by 30 years with the exception of 1885, and that's why all of the ages differed by 30 years apart.
Actually, it was "to be concluded", not "to be continued", and the only Back To The Future movie to say to be concluded was Back to the Future Part: II released in 1989.
It was "to be concluded" after the second one, it was "to be continued" after the first one. I haven't watched this video in a while. Did I say something different than that?
@@RyanReacts14 You did, you said it was "to be continued" instead of "to be concluded". The first movie and the third movie didn't have those because the creators of the trilogy didn't intend to create a sequel and left the ending to Part: I to be a joke and since Back to the Future Part: III was the last movie released in the trilogy in 1990, they put "The End" as the trilogy concluded as if the entire trilogy was one large story. Another fun fact is that they intended for the second movie to conclude the trilogy and featured both Part: II and III, but it was too long and was cut into two different films. That is why the third movie came out six months after the second movie, because they were filmed back-to-back. Well, that, and so Back to the Future Part: III would be the first universal movie to use to 1990 Universal 75th anniversary introduction.
Actually, Marty is 17 years old, and George and Lorraine are 17 years old as well in 1955. The trilogy tended to sort out the characters into three different ages in a spectrum. "17 years, 47 years, and 77 years old." All the ages differ by each other by 30 years since every time travel year differed by each other by 30 years with the exception of 1885, and that's why all of the ages differed by 30 years apart.
Love the father son dynamic
Thank you. :)
Actually, it was "to be concluded", not "to be continued", and the only Back To The Future movie to say to be concluded was Back to the Future Part: II released in 1989.
It was "to be concluded" after the second one, it was "to be continued" after the first one. I haven't watched this video in a while. Did I say something different than that?
@@RyanReacts14 You did, you said it was "to be continued" instead of "to be concluded". The first movie and the third movie didn't have those because the creators of the trilogy didn't intend to create a sequel and left the ending to Part: I to be a joke and since Back to the Future Part: III was the last movie released in the trilogy in 1990, they put "The End" as the trilogy concluded as if the entire trilogy was one large story. Another fun fact is that they intended for the second movie to conclude the trilogy and featured both Part: II and III, but it was too long and was cut into two different films. That is why the third movie came out six months after the second movie, because they were filmed back-to-back. Well, that, and so Back to the Future Part: III would be the first universal movie to use to 1990 Universal 75th anniversary introduction.
TAB was also a diet soda
Can you and your son react to Back to the Future Part: II and III please?
It's on the list. We just need to find the time.
@@RyanReacts14 Oh, ok, thank you.