You can buy Mig 29s. Paul Allen's estate has one that flies 10 miles from here. There are likely 1 to 2 dozen flyable Migs within a hundred miles of me in the US NW. All you need is a billion so you can afford to use, feed, and house it. I hear they aren't to bad to buy. But keeping it flyable turns a large fortune into a small one.
No doubts after reading comments below about this beautiful machines , I would like to salute those pilots who are flying these machines and engineers who built these .
Умеет Сергей Богдан управлять истребителем , крутой , ас мастер своего дело 👍🏽 . Су - 57 это более совершенное техника и маневренный чем предыдущие . Спасибо за классное видео Airguardian . 😎
I don't know about its actual performance on the battlefield, but it certainly is a beautiful plane. It has that perfect aesthetic fusion of the YF23 which I personally think is a very nice looking plane, with the essence of a flanker.
The incredible precise handling and ability of these aircraft give the Russians undeniably deserved volumes of credibility with aerospace technology. They are masters of their craft, hands down. Anyone who downplays or criticises the incredible sophistication of the technology powering and flying these planes is a fool.
@@Dangermonkey1000 Not a fair comparison. SU30 first flight was almost 20 years after that of the F-14. F-22 first flight was even later. The A, B, and D model would be out of date by now but the Super Tomcat 21 would be very advanced; an even greater "iron jet" than the F-15E, with a gigantic AESA radar, JHMCS, less canopy bows, thrust vectoring(!), and the same engines that are going into the F-15EX today. It would have also had increased weapon carrying capability, a full glass cockpit, integrated sensor suite, and much more internal fuel for a longer loiter time. It could have been the best fighter the world has ever seen, but one problem: $$$ and the damn feds wanted the Super Hornet (bleh) instead.
@@adjustings673 Were they converts or new builds? I missed all that some how. If you check they make all the same arguments for all the great planes, but they all must go anyway. An example is welding 2 P-51s together thinking that would work in a jet age. Except the B-52 which is bordering on weird now. I'd bet the Tomcat met the same fate the other swing wings met. Heavy and expensive to build and maintain. And it is no longer needed, or say the aero guys. It was one of the best no doubt, and it has always made me wonder what the one-eleven would've been if the AF had built it alone. But the TFX is now completely to bed. We have moved on.
@@duster0066 "Heavy and expensive to build and maintain" you mean like the F-35? This swing wing would be a fully enhanced fresh build, not an upgrade. You can't do that many structural, sensor, avionics, and engine upgrades without completely totaling it on an old airframe which already has thousands of hours on it.
I'll give full credit to the Russian's, they can make some amazing aircraft. And regardless of whether the SU-57 can or cannot beat an F-22, it's still an amazing looking aircraft.
I admire how all the Russian aircraft are made to higher tolerances for landing on sketchy airfields, including this. Creativity embracing both the fantastic & the practical; me like ;)
It was necessary for the stealth profile. You cannot have the 3D thrust vectoring that the russians have with great stealth characteristics, so the Russians made a compromise and opted to have as low frontal radar cross section as possible. (As that's usually crucial when being vectored in to intercept incoming aircraft. Got to say, on land it looks weird, in the air it looks like a sword of doom
Also affects drag. The more bulky, the more volume of air you need to displace, so keeping it slim makes it faster. Same thing goes for reduced vertical tail surface making it a less draggy airframe.
@@Airguardian But it is performed in a different manner: from a nearly standstill no backward diving to gain speed but instead powerful climbing again with a smooth transition into horizontal flight... That's not just something 'good old'. And the 57 just uses its interim engines...
Yes, agree... not the 'traditional way' of doing it but I'd still call it a tailslide ;) Since the TVC allow for better control of the airframe, it's not immediately nosing down to gain speed and control quickly back but rather deliberately delaying it to demonstrate controllabilty I would assume.
@@Airguardian There's nothing to disagree on. I just wanted to underline the sheer power of those engines which not only prevent the plane from sinking while it is sliding on its tail ☺️ but instead are capable to gain altitude again from this position.
@@commanderrockwell1123 I served on land, so the unequivocal answer is SU-25. With modern means of protection, it is almost impossible to bring him down, and he brings total destruction on land. Believe me, you don’t want to be under his blow, this is a real monster. The main air force strike aircraft in the air is the SU-30SM. Its equipment for the Air Force is somewhat different from the ostentatious and discussed. Su-35S is a narrow specialist, a pronounced hunter. Sniper if you like. It is purchased, but this is not the main strike aircraft. The best in the world undoubtedly Su-57. Its capabilities are impressive, but not all of its capabilities. This is a perspective 5+ generation aviation complex, with modernization up to 5 ++. His fights are in the future. There is nothing of the kind in the world today.
betmen RUS Ah, I see. I have to wonder though, how does the Su-25 compare to the Americans’ A-10? I’ve often seen it being treated as the “Russian Equivalent”. Also, since both are getting quite old (yet still remain powerful regardless), have any replacements been spoken of in Russia?
@@commanderrockwell1123 Glider replacement is not planned. It is a mistake to assume that airplane for air force have media designations. For example, the Su-27 or Su-25, which expired, are being replaced with new Su-27 or Su-25 of the latest modernization. They do not have designations as about it write in the media. If media write that they are purchasing new modernized Su-27 or Su-25, no one pays attention to this. If the Air Force is asked about the Su-35 or Su-39, they cannot confirm this, because there are no such machines in the Air Force.
Lol just checked wikipedia. The total number of SU-57s built is 11. The only production SU-57 ever built is currently a pile of charred rubble. The number in service is 10 and all of them are prototypes. And people actually think the SU-57 has the capability to stand up to the F-22 in real combat. 1 squadron of F-22s would have a 2 to 1 advantage over Russia's entire inventory of 5th generation fighters
Judging purely from available videos of what has been publicly demonstrated so far, the Su-35 does crazier stuff than the Su-57. But to categorically state that the Su-35 has better maneuverability based on that alone may be short sighted, as I suspect we haven't really been shown the full potential of the Su-57 yet. I suspect the 57 should be closely matching the Su-35's capabilities and even exceed them in some regards.
@@shiftingndrifting1532 🤣🤣🤣 look and admire www.google.com/amp/s/fr.sputniknews.com/amp/maghreb/201912271042670860-lacquisition-de-su-57-par-lalgerie-est-une-revolution-sur-le-flanc-ouest-de-la-mediterranee/ we are allied to Russia they can sell to us anything 🤣🤣
I just realized something on the jet and is with the geometry. When no light is reflecting the jet from a certain angle (that is basically all black and dark) it looks like the jet is pointing straight WEST when the jet is going SOUTHEAST. What a scary illusion
Are fully 3D vectorial nozzles They move in a 360º circle where thrust direction is needed during flight and maneuvers. They can't enter in uncontrolled flight with any position since the engines will move to exit until airflow to surface controls is restored.
F35 after watching this: " My... computers... are... sad.... :(" Lockheed after watching this: "Call ir senat'rs. We're gon need another 10 bill'n riiight there."
@@Airguardian just an idea, maybe in your camera settings you can turn on timestamps? It would save you lots of work in the editor if it is possible to just print the timestamps to every frame, when recording :) Anyway I'm not complaining mate! I'm already very happy that you give us our weekly doses of gorgeous Russian birds 😍 "Thank you Airguardian, for pimping my UA-cam" 😋
@@sadekgheidan It's appreciated! But that wouldn't help... you already have UA-cam's time stamps, just need to write it like this and when you hit the time stamp the video plays at the specified moment, example: 5:27 ---> Cool sharp turn!
Impressive and beautiful aircraft indeed. It will be one of the best when finally going into production. But it does nothing the F22 couldn't already do 15 years ago. Only advantage of the SU57, Russia will sell them abroad. Because they have to earn money with it.
Not quite right. Maneuverability aside, this plane can do quite a few things that the Raptor can't. For example, Raptor lacks IRST, so it CANNOT operate truly stealthily without support from other aircraft. The Su-57 can. Also the Su-57 has built in laser pods to blind heatseekers fired on it. F-22 can't do that. And there are many other things but we'll leave it at that for now ;)
Maneuverability aside and, just out of curiosity, how is the infrared sighting and tracking (IRST) in the SU-57 allow it to operate more stealthily? 🤔Regardless of AWACS or GCI, IRST is for tracking. I would agree-or disagree-with this if you said the SU-57 is more “stealthy” by tracking, shadowing and avoiding through IRST but NOT because of better stealth characteristics, better materials science and manufacturing expertise through the decades. Don’t think I’m busting your chops on this. Designers knew this and decided to take a more balanced approach hence why the side-facing radars, the really COOL directional infrared countermeasures system (the DIRCM turrets or “built in laser pods” as you call them), 3D thrust vectoring and other unique features of the SU-57. The F-22 CANNOT do certain things the SU-57 does and the SU-57 CANNOT do certain things the F-22 does. Sadly, lots of people are ignorant about this and people will continue to argue which is better because everyone thinks these two AWESOME aircrafts were designed to taylor to the same air combat doctrines. But that’s another really long subject and I have a flight to take tomorrow so we’ll leave it at that for now ;)
@@buckingMAT Agree. Any plane turning on a radar stops being 'truly stealthy'. The IRST can be used to detect targets without emitting anything. Thus a plane with such a device can head to a place where a plane or group have been detected (say, using GCI or naval radars) and this info can be fed to it by datalink, again, without the plane emitting anything. Then when it gets close enough, it can use the OLS (IRST) to completely pinpoint the threat. The Raptor would have to head to such a scenario with no other information than that provided by datalink as the jet itself wouldn't be able to scan the airspace without seriously risking giving its presence away. Of course, the Raptor is meant to function in a different way, like you said, both jets have been designed with different doctrines in mind. I just think the russian one is more versatile and adaptive. Never said Su-57 has better stealth than the Raptor. Think everyone agrees that the Raptor is to this day the stealthiest jet around from a pure RCS perspective. But RCS works only with radars, and to be TRULY stealthy you want no emissions at all. So there's that.
Exactly what I've written upper in this topic. Also, Su-57 may do some air ballet...but is far from being combat ready. Heck, they stopped production not long ago.
Russia’s Air Force to Receive First Serial-Produced Su-57 Fighter Jet by Year’s End - The Diplomat thediplomat.com/2019/11/russias-air-force-to-receive-first-serial-produced-su-57-fighter-jet-by-years-end/
What brand model kit? I've just gotten back into modelling after about 15 years, it's so relaxing of a hobby, I've already built a SU-33 C. Second model I've at that time and wish I had done a better job
What a gorgeous, slick looking machine!! Russians build some FINE looking jets... But, maybe jet designers can share some ideas with Russian car manufacturers? Maybe Suhkoi can open 'super car' division?
I remember american jet fighter pilot says "America built a jet like a fine watches, they can take G's really smooth, but russian built fighter jet like a tank" well.. They sure did
![Su-57 Top Gun Maneuver Flown in Real Life by Sergey Bogdan!! ✈️ MAKS 2017 [Remastered]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cmQoXZ9NIiM/mqdefault.jpg)
In Russia, Physics.exe doesn't crash Jets;
Jets crash Physics.exe (:
That's a fantastic take! xDDD
Haha great comment 😂
Bueno siempre los mejores
nice comment....
Ahahaha one of the best coments of "military UA-cam"! ..i have ever heard😁
Поздрав из Србије браћо!
4th gen fighters: “Dang I have a terrible turn radius!”
5th gen fighters: *I A M H E L I C O P T E Я*
5th gen ROFLCOPTER
That r at the end got me 🤣 💀
Does the su-57 have a better TWR than the F-16 though?
@@timbrwolf1121 much
Stop putting that Я, it is pronunced as "ya"
Russian Gov: So how big you gonna make this new fighter jet?
Sukhoi: Yes
xDDD
Actually, it is slightly smaller than the legacy flankers...
The new unmanned Ohotnik UCAV, now THAT is huge!!
@@Airguardian Okhotnik... What an appropriate name for a UCAV...
@@kranichkrone Hunter, if translate on eng
Hahahahahahahah
Man. The Russians build beautiful looking aircraft that are also amazing when flying. Love the Sukhois.
Nowadays aircraft is build like japanese origami paper folding shape but it fly bcos of intelligent system control on-board.
Well anyway they must engage in dog fight to determine who is the champion..🤣🤣🤣🤣
@ncsam 000000 sure mate
@ncsam 000000 Nope. YF-23.
ncsam 000000 I don’t think they bothered with your blueprints
"How many Gs can it pull?"
Pilot: "Yes."
Gotta admit, no matter what other aircraft you are a fan boy for, this thing is pretty cool and looks amazing.
Spectator: How long can you keep the burners lit in slow flight?
Pilot: Hold my vodka...
On a second thought - don't hold my vodka - I'll need only one hand for this and why would I stop drinking now that I've opened my second bottle...
Su-57 and Sergey Bogdan is a deadly combination. Best display I've ever seen. 👍👍👍
He is 'chiefpilot' both in literal and figurative sense! ;)
Sukhoi to russian gov: how maneuverable to u want this jet to be
Russian gov: yes
Sukhoi : say no more
@IMxYOURxDADDY 😂
"Make it go sideways, backwards and fast upside down".
""At the same time".
"Ooookay".
Su-57,air ballet master.aerodynamics master.always a joy,treat to watch.great beauty & finesse.
I could hear the SU just saying “physics, if you interrupt me I will send you to gulag”
Moron!
You can hear the power of the engines eating up the air , what an amazing fighter jet, crazy maneuvers unlike any other jet I’ve seen . UFO killer !
Laughs in f22 made 30 years earlier
Hell i love the digital camo paint sheme ,
I kinda liked better the other one but it's cool, I agree ;)
@@Airguardian Lol , i think People are actually devided about colour shemes ,
@@f-4ephantomll271 According to Who..
@@f-4ephantomll271 As I said, I like all Su-57 schemes so far but I am partial and biased for the first one ;)
@@Airguardian So you mean the prototype sheme !!!???
What a BEAST. Well done Russia.
Thank you, this great! Forget Porsche, dont want a Ferrari, I want a Sukhoi! Preverbly the 35 , a 57 or 47 would also be great!
Hahaha, thanks!
I agree, damn them cars, if it does not boost vertically into the clouds at 700km/h I'm not interested, lol.
If you're okay with the 35, then the Su-37 will blow you away. NATO nicknamed it Su-37 "Terminator"- and for good reason 😉
And no car drifts in air, does not cobra, kulbit,no tail slide in air, not very interesting
@@sadekgheidan Isn't it outdated? I think the Su 27 would blow him away.
You can buy Mig 29s. Paul Allen's estate has one that flies 10 miles from here. There are likely 1 to 2 dozen flyable Migs within a hundred miles of me in the US NW. All you need is a billion so you can afford to use, feed, and house it. I hear they aren't to bad to buy. But keeping it flyable turns a large fortune into a small one.
No doubts after reading comments below about this beautiful machines , I would like to salute those pilots who are flying these machines and engineers who built these .
Love to see a wide show at the same time. When there's no ground ref I can't tell it's overall speed!! Wonderful footage though - thank you!
You're welcome!
Tom Cruise: i was just joking in the movie, you know it right Sergey?
xDDDDDDD
Красивая техника, и уникальный пилотаж !
Lets just appreciate the sound and the UFO turn. I am watching this with closed eyes 👌😍
xD
Wow, what a stunning Performance, and Wow again, what a Beauty❤
Умеет Сергей Богдан управлять истребителем , крутой , ас мастер своего дело 👍🏽 .
Су - 57 это более совершенное техника и маневренный чем предыдущие .
Спасибо за классное видео Airguardian . 😎
Спасибо за комментарий, Критик!
@@Airguardian Всегда пожалуста . 😎
I don't know about its actual performance on the battlefield, but it certainly is a beautiful plane.
It has that perfect aesthetic fusion of the YF23 which I personally think is a very nice looking plane, with the essence of a flanker.
The YF23 is an ugly ass plane
The incredible precise handling and ability of these aircraft give the Russians undeniably deserved volumes of credibility with aerospace technology. They are masters of their craft, hands down. Anyone who downplays or criticises the incredible sophistication of the technology powering and flying these planes is a fool.
Big +1
Nevertheless....there will always be the Cold War nurtured haters!!!
Beautiful 🐦...🇷🇺
:)
A beast! has all the strengths of its predecessors but without the weaknesses.
And the pilot is very very good!
It's mastery of Physics. Making Physics work for you. Awesome !
İ was waiting for "decepticons, tranform!!!" Cool aircraft, hope it will be useful for keeping peace in the world.
Currently most beautiful aircraft in the sky... still think the F-14 was more sexy. Too bad they never made the Super Tomcat 21...
tomcat is just over hype.......nothing in front of su30 or f22
@@Dangermonkey1000 Not a fair comparison. SU30 first flight was almost 20 years after that of the F-14. F-22 first flight was even later. The A, B, and D model would be out of date by now but the Super Tomcat 21 would be very advanced; an even greater "iron jet" than the F-15E, with a gigantic AESA radar, JHMCS, less canopy bows, thrust vectoring(!), and the same engines that are going into the F-15EX today. It would have also had increased weapon carrying capability, a full glass cockpit, integrated sensor suite, and much more internal fuel for a longer loiter time. It could have been the best fighter the world has ever seen, but one problem: $$$ and the damn feds wanted the Super Hornet (bleh) instead.
@aussiebear22 as if we needed more reasons to hate dick cheney
@@adjustings673 Were they converts or new builds? I missed all that some how. If you check they make all the same arguments for all the great planes, but they all must go anyway. An example is welding 2 P-51s together thinking that would work in a jet age. Except the B-52 which is bordering on weird now. I'd bet the Tomcat met the same fate the other swing wings met. Heavy and expensive to build and maintain. And it is no longer needed, or say the aero guys. It was one of the best no doubt, and it has always made me wonder what the one-eleven would've been if the AF had built it alone. But the TFX is now completely to bed. We have moved on.
@@duster0066 "Heavy and expensive to build and maintain" you mean like the F-35? This swing wing would be a fully enhanced fresh build, not an upgrade. You can't do that many structural, sensor, avionics, and engine upgrades without completely totaling it on an old airframe which already has thousands of hours on it.
I'll give full credit to the Russian's, they can make some amazing aircraft. And regardless of whether the SU-57 can or cannot beat an F-22, it's still an amazing looking aircraft.
Greetings from India ( Sukhoi Are Beautiful & Deadly too)
This thing just looks beautiful
I admire how all the Russian aircraft are made to higher tolerances for landing on sketchy airfields, including this. Creativity embracing both the fantastic & the practical; me like ;)
Отличное видео! Очень круто товарищ!
Спасибо товарищ! ❤️
The most beautiful plane in the sky and the best pilot to fly it!
Sergey Bogdan is a true beast.
I've seen his other videos, it's crazy!
Las maniobras son increíbles!.El avión una maravilla! . EXCELENTE VIDEO!. FELICITACIONES AIRGUARDIAN! .👍👏👏👏👏👏👏
:DDD
Another great video dude. For such a big bird, that head on silhouette is tiny...
It's as slim as it gets for a fighter jet!
It was necessary for the stealth profile. You cannot have the 3D thrust vectoring that the russians have with great stealth characteristics, so the Russians made a compromise and opted to have as low frontal radar cross section as possible. (As that's usually crucial when being vectored in to intercept incoming aircraft. Got to say, on land it looks weird, in the air it looks like a sword of doom
Also affects drag. The more bulky, the more volume of air you need to displace, so keeping it slim makes it faster. Same thing goes for reduced vertical tail surface making it a less draggy airframe.
I thought the same the first time I saw a Lancaster bomber front on, looks like a dart.
Beautiful jet, just beautiful!
So fighters come in speedster version like Porsche now. Also, deliberately flat spin at low altitudes, mind blown.
This SU-T 57 is an realy Killer- Jet . I love the russian Jetfighters . 😊👍
4:29 That` sick bro 😮
Good old tailslide! :)
@@Airguardian But it is performed in a different manner: from a nearly standstill no backward diving to gain speed but instead powerful climbing again with a smooth transition into horizontal flight... That's not just something 'good old'. And the 57 just uses its interim engines...
Yes, agree... not the 'traditional way' of doing it but I'd still call it a tailslide ;)
Since the TVC allow for better control of the airframe, it's not immediately nosing down to gain speed and control quickly back but rather deliberately delaying it to demonstrate controllabilty I would assume.
@@Airguardian There's nothing to disagree on. I just wanted to underline the sheer power of those engines which not only prevent the plane from sinking while it is sliding on its tail ☺️ but instead are capable to gain altitude again from this position.
SU-57 Truly a Beautiful Aircraft
Issac Newton: According to my law of physics, That is illegal.
Su-57: Flies.
Isaac Newton: Th-... THAT'S ILLEGAL!
xD
Welcome to the world of Putinian Physics
Su-57: Physics? Never heard of that
Simply put best at what it was design an built for. Russian 🇷🇺 angel 🙏✌💜
Su 57: physics is so boring.
Raptor: " crying in hangar "
:)
Actually the Raptor does its own share of physics-boggling stuff ;)
But havent seen it ever do a sustained 80º high alpha pass yet!
Airguardian What would you consider the best aircraft in the world today? Or at least, In Russia? Also, how well do the Su-35s still hold up?
@@commanderrockwell1123 I served on land, so the unequivocal answer is SU-25. With modern means of protection, it is almost impossible to bring him down, and he brings total destruction on land. Believe me, you don’t want to be under his blow, this is a real monster.
The main air force strike aircraft in the air is the SU-30SM. Its equipment for the Air Force is somewhat different from the ostentatious and discussed. Su-35S is a narrow specialist, a pronounced hunter. Sniper if you like. It is purchased, but this is not the main strike aircraft.
The best in the world undoubtedly Su-57. Its capabilities are impressive, but not all of its capabilities. This is a perspective 5+ generation aviation complex, with modernization up to 5 ++. His fights are in the future. There is nothing of the kind in the world today.
betmen RUS Ah, I see. I have to wonder though, how does the Su-25 compare to the Americans’ A-10? I’ve often seen it being treated as the “Russian Equivalent”. Also, since both are getting quite old (yet still remain powerful regardless), have any replacements been spoken of in Russia?
@@commanderrockwell1123 Glider replacement is not planned. It is a mistake to assume that airplane for air force have media designations. For example, the Su-27 or Su-25, which expired, are being replaced with new Su-27 or Su-25 of the latest modernization. They do not have designations as about it write in the media. If media write that they are purchasing new modernized Su-27 or Su-25, no one pays attention to this. If the Air Force is asked about the Su-35 or Su-39, they cannot confirm this, because there are no such machines in the Air Force.
Terrifying and beautiful. Just the way a fighter jet should be. I'd put this just a hair short of the F-14 tomcat. Raw power right there.
Plane badass. Dig that rollout.
Nothing beats a Sukhoi !
Wow these jets are incredible. All 12 of them
Plus 76 in production 😉
@@eu3127 There are no SU-57s in production. And the current number in service is 11 after 1 crashed
Wrong. There are 12 such jets. The one that crashed was the FIRST production model (would be 13).
Lol just checked wikipedia. The total number of SU-57s built is 11. The only production SU-57 ever built is currently a pile of charred rubble. The number in service is 10 and all of them are prototypes. And people actually think the SU-57 has the capability to stand up to the F-22 in real combat. 1 squadron of F-22s would have a 2 to 1 advantage over Russia's entire inventory of 5th generation fighters
Wow. That lateral translation at 0:48
Russia makes awesome beautiful war birds!👍👍👍👍
+1
SU-47 in particular. For the first time, I felt guilty for thinking a war machine beautiful.
Bro, in your opinion, which has better maneuverability? Su 57 or Su 35?
Judging purely from available videos of what has been publicly demonstrated so far, the Su-35 does crazier stuff than the Su-57. But to categorically state that the Su-35 has better maneuverability based on that alone may be short sighted, as I suspect we haven't really been shown the full potential of the Su-57 yet. I suspect the 57 should be closely matching the Su-35's capabilities and even exceed them in some regards.
@@Airguardian Thank you!👍👍
Su-57 Felon , enters production.
Behold : THE MOST ADVANCED - REAL - FIGHTER JET IN THE WORLD.
Best ... Best🌠✓ ... SU - 57. Russia Jet Fighter, .... God Bless, ..... Cheerio.🌠✈🏆✈🌠👍👍👍🌠🌟🌠.
It will be in Algeria in 2025 🥳🥳
Algeria will be the first country to have it , they recently signed a contract for
14 SU-57
14 SU-35
14 SU-34
Tewfik BK when did Algeria ever say it was buying su-57’s. Good question would be if russia would even sell it to them
@@shiftingndrifting1532 🤣🤣🤣 look and admire
www.google.com/amp/s/fr.sputniknews.com/amp/maghreb/201912271042670860-lacquisition-de-su-57-par-lalgerie-est-une-revolution-sur-le-flanc-ouest-de-la-mediterranee/
we are allied to Russia they can sell to us anything 🤣🤣
@@shiftingndrifting1532 what happened 🤔 you swallowed your tongue 🤣
Tewfik BK give me one credible source linking Algeria to buying the su-57
@@shiftingndrifting1532 I just did it's Sputnik what you need more than that 🤣
Excellent fighter jet SU 57
If you know what you are looking it, physics.exe is working just fine. One hell of a pilot there, the hardware ain't too shabby either.
The title is a joke, of course physics are working fine ;)
Fenomenal SU57 único en el mundo
2:21 round and round and so onn
Gotta love flat spins!
Sounds marvelous
I love the jet's shape. Really menacing
Simply incredible maneuverability
I just realized something on the jet and is with the geometry. When no light is reflecting the jet from a certain angle (that is basically all black and dark) it looks like the jet is pointing straight WEST when the jet is going SOUTHEAST. What a scary illusion
Didn't quite notice that but yeah... in the distance and as jets get washed away in shadows, orientation can be a problem, not just with this one! ;)
Neither Americans nor the Chinese fully understand what beauty is.
Russian Jetfighter are number one in the world
Thank You. I am understanding , human just got better. Thank You
Russians keep building such a stuff, contrabalance and do not let america terrorising the hole world.
Whole world
Amaizing Bird
Late Issac Newton better rewrite his law of gravity notes!
@@geraldboykin6159 If only he could see! :p
Are the engines pointing inward to cancel out assymetric thrust in case of one engine going off?
Probably.
Are fully 3D vectorial nozzles They move in a 360º circle where thrust direction is needed during flight and maneuvers. They can't enter in uncontrolled flight with any position since the engines will move to exit until airflow to surface controls is restored.
F35 after watching this: " My... computers... are... sad.... :(" Lockheed after watching this: "Call ir senat'rs. We're gon need another 10 bill'n riiight there."
these tricks are worthless in a fight. Commbat between fighter jets happens "beyond visual range". Dogfights are a thing of the past.
@@AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH-y5f When both sides jets are built with stealth in mind, then BVR us quite a likely possibility.
@@Schnittertm1 when both sides have radar missles and awacs then bvr is th best way to engage.
@@AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH-y5f bvr, the low-signature blip that's too low, too slow, and changing direction unlike a jet is not going to register as a jet.
The F35's computers may have some problems but are the most advanced in the world. They are superior to Su57 avionics and systems.
Beautiful 🇮🇷❤🇷🇺
Isaac Newton : For me gravity exist.
Sergey Bogdan : Hold my Vodka.
Very impressive.
Nice! Good video.
Thanks Mike!
Sergey Bogdan yes!
Love that camo
Mmm, worthy successor of Lady Flanker's elegance.
Has the Su-57 been given a callsign/reporting name/moniker yet, by the way?
Not sure!
@@Airguardian
Late reply, but thanks for that.
@@cerealata9035 Felon
Su57 : it's flying "maple leaf" !!
Hey! Great vid, but can you add timestamps for some cool maneuvers coz sometimes I watch the vids in a hurry and have to skip through it😅
I sometimes do!
But not always, it takes some work to do, you understand... :p
Maybe later!
@@Airguardian just an idea, maybe in your camera settings you can turn on timestamps? It would save you lots of work in the editor if it is possible to just print the timestamps to every frame, when recording :)
Anyway I'm not complaining mate! I'm already very happy that you give us our weekly doses of gorgeous Russian birds 😍 "Thank you Airguardian, for pimping my UA-cam" 😋
@@sadekgheidan It's appreciated!
But that wouldn't help... you already have UA-cam's time stamps, just need to write it like this and when you hit the time stamp the video plays at the specified moment, example:
5:27 ---> Cool sharp turn!
@@Airguardian yeah it sure is a tedious process...no problem mate I do understand : )
Impressive and beautiful aircraft indeed. It will be one of the best when finally going into production. But it does nothing the F22 couldn't already do 15 years ago. Only advantage of the SU57, Russia will sell them abroad. Because they have to earn money with it.
Not quite right. Maneuverability aside, this plane can do quite a few things that the Raptor can't. For example, Raptor lacks IRST, so it CANNOT operate truly stealthily without support from other aircraft. The Su-57 can. Also the Su-57 has built in laser pods to blind heatseekers fired on it. F-22 can't do that. And there are many other things but we'll leave it at that for now ;)
Maneuverability aside and, just out of curiosity, how is the infrared sighting and tracking (IRST) in the SU-57 allow it to operate more stealthily? 🤔Regardless of AWACS or GCI, IRST is for tracking. I would agree-or disagree-with this if you said the SU-57 is more “stealthy” by tracking, shadowing and avoiding through IRST but NOT because of better stealth characteristics, better materials science and manufacturing expertise through the decades. Don’t think I’m busting your chops on this. Designers knew this and decided to take a more balanced approach hence why the side-facing radars, the really COOL directional infrared countermeasures system (the DIRCM turrets or “built in laser pods” as you call them), 3D thrust vectoring and other unique features of the SU-57.
The F-22 CANNOT do certain things the SU-57 does and the SU-57 CANNOT do certain things the F-22 does. Sadly, lots of people are ignorant about this and people will continue to argue which is better because everyone thinks these two AWESOME aircrafts were designed to taylor to the same air combat doctrines. But that’s another really long subject and I have a flight to take tomorrow so we’ll leave it at that for now ;)
@@buckingMAT Agree. Any plane turning on a radar stops being 'truly stealthy'. The IRST can be used to detect targets without emitting anything. Thus a plane with such a device can head to a place where a plane or group have been detected (say, using GCI or naval radars) and this info can be fed to it by datalink, again, without the plane emitting anything.
Then when it gets close enough, it can use the OLS (IRST) to completely pinpoint the threat. The Raptor would have to head to such a scenario with no other information than that provided by datalink as the jet itself wouldn't be able to scan the airspace without seriously risking giving its presence away. Of course, the Raptor is meant to function in a different way, like you said, both jets have been designed with different doctrines in mind. I just think the russian one is more versatile and adaptive. Never said Su-57 has better stealth than the Raptor. Think everyone agrees that the Raptor is to this day the stealthiest jet around from a pure RCS perspective. But RCS works only with radars, and to be TRULY stealthy you want no emissions at all. So there's that.
Exactly what I've written upper in this topic. Also, Su-57 may do some air ballet...but is far from being combat ready. Heck, they stopped production not long ago.
Russia’s Air Force to Receive First Serial-Produced Su-57 Fighter Jet by Year’s End - The Diplomat
thediplomat.com/2019/11/russias-air-force-to-receive-first-serial-produced-su-57-fighter-jet-by-years-end/
SU 57 This is far the greatest fighter jet ever built...
What a beautiful airplane! ❤️
100% :D
I want this in my collection when amazon start it's selling
I can't believe this plane has a nice battle record along with the F22 during the Osea-Erusea Lighthouse War
I do like the way that plane looks I just bought a model of this yesterday hope I can do it justice
What brand model kit? I've just gotten back into modelling after about 15 years, it's so relaxing of a hobby, I've already built a SU-33 C. Second model I've at that time and wish I had done a better job
Where did you buy it
I got it hooby store I also found on line but I wanted 148 but I could find in 172
@@aaronvandoorn8397 thank you anyway, I was just wondering what brand model? That's all, but thank you for your reply
REALY WONDERFUL FIGHTER S 57.AND INDONESIA WILL BE THE NEXT OWNER THIS MACHINE,INSYAALLAH.
Awsome Russian skills and technology. 😎
What a gorgeous, slick looking machine!! Russians build some FINE looking jets... But, maybe jet designers can share some ideas with Russian car manufacturers? Maybe Suhkoi can open 'super car' division?
What a beauty 💪😏
Why is the right engine fully lit and the left is only partially in burner 🤔🤔🤔
They are working differently. I don't know the reason why.
@@Airguardian they need some Dependable Pratt and Whitney engines pushing ;)
Russian engines are very reliable as well.
❤👍 FROM INDIA
Blyatiful!
I remember american jet fighter pilot says "America built a jet like a fine watches, they can take G's really smooth, but russian built fighter jet like a tank" well.. They sure did
Amazing aircraft
Nice title
Thanks!
I hope the YT algorithm does like it too! ;)
@@Airguardian LMAO
@@SM_Fato xD
what a beautiful machine , always love Russian tech
Cel mai frumos avion de luptă. Arată frumos, zboară frumos.
love from india my brothers