The Shadow of the Tower - Episode 7

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 157

  • @TellEmB290
    @TellEmB290 4 роки тому +39

    I initially agreed that the premise of this episode was ridiculous and more of a comic relief departure from history...until I did some google-fu and found that the deposition given by Bernart de Vignolles at the end of the episode is actually a historical document, and this shit really happened. The Prior of the Knights Hospitaller and his ragtag band of co-conspirators really did try to assassinate the Tudor leadership with astrology, and the king really did see fit to document it.
    I suppose the lesson is people have always been crazy and stupid, we just don't bother hiding it so much anymore.

    • @AnamCaraDeMexico
      @AnamCaraDeMexico 2 роки тому +9

      Never make plans with Rasputin when Mercury is retrograde.

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      Exactly the alchemist was getting loads of money for absolute lunacy , the fact they had that much money to spend on such a ludicrous concept , showed how corrupt they really were . I was gobsmacked Henry 7th killed sir Stanley . Yet constantly chasing the idea of edwards descendants was crazy as they were illegitimate anyway

    • @gm2407
      @gm2407 Рік тому +3

      If someone can get a person to believe one absurdity the groundwork is laid for believing person to accept more.

    • @booksteer7057
      @booksteer7057 Рік тому +1

      That's because the crazy, stupid people don't see themselves as crazy and stupid. 😃

    • @user-od5fh3gn4d
      @user-od5fh3gn4d 10 місяців тому +1

      Sounds like this is the authentic and original version of "Star Wars", I guess.... 🤣

  • @Salamon2
    @Salamon2 9 років тому +45

    While some might say this episode is weaker, I really like how it examined how life and culture was changing. How some people were adapting while others couldn't. That's something a lot of these mini-series don't always manage to capture.

    • @whitney1348
      @whitney1348 Рік тому +5

      I love this one. The whole business of “ killing the king “ is hilarious. I feel for Morton’s agent at the end : “
      Write everything down” 😂

  • @brendonmcmorrow3886
    @brendonmcmorrow3886 3 роки тому +17

    Very pleased to see the Major from Fawlty Towers making an appearance in this episode!

    • @johnclark677
      @johnclark677 2 роки тому +2

      “ I took a young lady to see India… at the Oval, she kept calling them the …😂😂

  • @MSEDzirasa2015
    @MSEDzirasa2015 11 років тому +24

    Omg I love Uncle's coat...reversible hahahaaa...Tudor rose on the outside and the white rose of York inside...I mean no one gives you great theatricals like the British...They are incomparable...WHAT TASTEFUL FILL-INS...!!!

  • @niccoarcadia4179
    @niccoarcadia4179 3 роки тому +14

    This is the comic relief episode...'and it works well!

    • @whitney1348
      @whitney1348 Рік тому +2

      Absolutely hilarious and well done.

  • @M1710100
    @M1710100 10 років тому +22

    "I am reluctant to discuss my successes in this field for obvious reasons..." Love him! :)

    • @lindadillon3061
      @lindadillon3061 3 роки тому +3

      Yes great acting and scripts. Very detailed and intelligently done. Worth watching more than once.

  • @MrsTudor1
    @MrsTudor1  11 років тому +14

    It's detailed. I like that. It shows a human Henry VII for a change - even better.

    • @seltaeb9691
      @seltaeb9691 Рік тому

      He was hardly in it. A complete damp squib.

  • @bbgunn917
    @bbgunn917 Рік тому +7

    This series is really good for showing the beliefs and prejudices of the time via social discussions. Would that people could converse on heated matters with such intelligence these days!

  • @Ben180173
    @Ben180173 Рік тому +6

    Fabulous comic writing and acting. It's more like an episode of Blackadder! And that's no criticism 😊

    • @gm2407
      @gm2407 Рік тому +2

      When I started watching this I understood the humour of Blackadder the first more. Not as appreciated as the later series but has its own charm.

    • @Albukhshi
      @Albukhshi 7 місяців тому +1

      And the best part is that this shit actually happened!

  • @pauloliver6813
    @pauloliver6813 10 років тому +45

    As others have said, this was clearly an attempt at bringing some "light relief" to the series after the amazing philosophical content of Episode 5, and the darkness of Episode 6.
    It is comparatively weak- but has its merits. Interesting, for example, to consider that the reign of Henry VII is contemporary with the "High Renaissance". Also interesting to think about just how efficient and extensive historical "secret services" really were. Lastly, I think the episode deals rather well with Alchemy/Astrology. It's easy for us to scoff at it, but at the time there were many who took it very seriously, while others of course saw through it.
    200 or so years later, even Isacc Newton had to seriously consider whether to dismiss astrology, or pursue it...

    • @aimeegreen
      @aimeegreen 9 років тому +8

      Well said & informative - thanks for posting!

    • @paulthomas9271
      @paulthomas9271 7 місяців тому

      There are still stupid people believing in the stars eg mystic meg in the newspaper 😂

  • @SavingHistory
    @SavingHistory 8 років тому +22

    Smashing! There's just nothing funnier than a senile old coot and his pedantic nephew plotting to murder a king! Loved this episode for taking a break and offering a lighter moment

  • @MrsTudor1
    @MrsTudor1  11 років тому +18

    Warbeck spent nine years happily destabilising Henry VII's throne, and Henry was more than patient with him. Many other Kings would have ripped his arms and legs off years before. As for Warwick, rock and a hard place spring to mind.

    • @anja1627
      @anja1627 7 років тому +2

      MrsTudor1 true! Imagine if it was Henry VII's son, Henry VIII, he's messing up with - destabilizing the throne and all that. He'd surely end up his head on a pike in an instant. Haha

    • @jardon8636
      @jardon8636 4 роки тому +3

      well, warbeck had powerful supporters like magaret of york dowager duchess of burgundy- the king of scotland, the king of france, the holy roman emperor etc....
      this is a funny episode, that actually is true* there was a reversed york-tudor coat , a visit to rome, a foreign spy paid by westminster* and suspected yorkist sympathies in the church....

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому +3

      The Warbeck Rebellion was Henry VII's second rebellion to deal with after the Lambert Simnel Rebellion of 1486-87. The rebellion led by Perkin Warbeck was a long drawn out affair and lasted between 1491 and 1499.

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому +2

      True yet there was a strong feeling that Henry Tudor was the usurper & the Yorkists wanted to unite being a figurehead. As we saw previously . Henry Tudor did have a thin line to the succession & he did to on those who had made him king ie Stanley , a lot felt that the Edward line had a stronger claim , yet the more iv researched Edward the more I find him a usurper, married twice & not divorced, removed king Henry due to Henry depression, Edward & Woodville lived incredibly lavishly on the tax payer

  • @tnecklover
    @tnecklover 11 років тому +9

    It's a very light hearted episode. Henry VII was very fortunate in that so many of his enemies were fools!

    • @anja1627
      @anja1627 7 років тому

      tnecklover his enemies were fools and he was so clever. haha

  • @DellBoy010
    @DellBoy010 9 років тому +17

    Master John: an avid snake oil salesman.

  • @zakesters
    @zakesters 4 роки тому +8

    I can't decide which "behind the scenes" aspect of this episode I like best: the fact that John Walsh is clearly at pains to keep a straight face for about half his scenes or Denis Carey's wonderfully sinister cackle at the very end of the episode...

  • @delphinidin
    @delphinidin 8 місяців тому +2

    "Killing a king... Saturn or Mars. Mars is best. Mars... that's Tuesdays." It tickles me that whoever wrote this episode actually researched astrology to do so, because all of that is actually accurate lol

  • @_GOD_HAND_
    @_GOD_HAND_ 2 роки тому +7

    Best episode of the series. Pure comedy gold.

    • @seltaeb9691
      @seltaeb9691 Рік тому +2

      The worst episode. A waste of time & leave the comic touch to Shakespeare's quill.

  • @NYCZ31
    @NYCZ31 7 років тому +21

    That reversible white rose/red rose coat is absolutely hilarious

  • @elizabeths4371
    @elizabeths4371 5 років тому +2

    I Really enjoyed this episode with Sir John Kendal, his silly nephew and Bernard the Frenchman who sounds like Inspector Clouseau

  • @Albukhshi
    @Albukhshi 4 роки тому +4

    "So perish all traitors!"
    Down the toilet?

  • @tnecklover
    @tnecklover 11 років тому +7

    Yes. There weren't enough grand events in Henry VII's reign to fill up twelve episodes, so they tracked down several more obscure or whimsical events and put them in. They're good, however.

    • @Orphen42O
      @Orphen42O 2 роки тому +3

      Henry always suspected that his nobles were plotting. One day he arranged for dogs to fight a lion. He expected the lion as "king of beasts" to win. He was very angry when the dogs , working in unison ,killed the lion. To prove that the natural order should be maintained, Henry had the victorious dogs hanged as a warning about the fate of people who tried to bring down "the king of beasts". The message was not lost on the noblemen. Henry VII also participated in the Age of Exploration by sponsoring John Cabot's attempt to discover a route to Asia. Instead of finding a route to China, Cabot discovered the north eastern coast of North America. Cabo t's discovery was the basis of England's claim to North America. The writers could have used these incidents as "filler". Actually, it is not that far-fetched to show plotters resorting to poison to eliminate a king. During this period, many prominent people actually were poisoned by their enemies.

    • @gm2407
      @gm2407 Рік тому +1

      Makes sense from a production stand point. The main cast and team can film the other episodes, this episode can be filmed at the same time with the ancilliary cast and crew with minimal input from the main cast.

    • @lilymarinovic1644
      @lilymarinovic1644 6 місяців тому +1

      ​​@@Orphen42Othere is a later episode devoted to Henry VII's sponsorship of John Cabot's expedition. It was indeed of great significance to Britain's claims in North America

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому +1

    It’s a interesting episode as it makes me read up more on other religions & how other faiths were treated . This theological dominance of Catholics, Christianity, I’m a atheist & would of been burnt probably as a heretic or a witch as I’m a woman .

  • @billijomaynard9081
    @billijomaynard9081 11 років тому +23

    I love Henry VII, He was more brilliant then he is given credit for. He was diplomatic at a time when those of royal blood were more interested in slaughtering each other then working out their differences for England's benefit.He was slow to anger and forgiving, the true embodiment of a King. I would have loved to sit down with him and have a conversation. He must have had a very inspired mind. I only wish his son had been more like him.

    • @388Caroline
      @388Caroline 6 років тому +6

      So true. His son was the Nero of England.

    • @lilymarinovic1644
      @lilymarinovic1644 2 роки тому +3

      I think Henry was never really, or at least never really felt he was, in a position where he was strong enough to simply ride roughshod over people, even his worst enemies. Hence his diplomacy and politic clemency.

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      And Henry viii was a giant cuckoo , he was left who a huge amount in the treasury & left us virtually bankrupt when Mary came to the thrown . Henry Tudor didn’t have mistresses loved his wife cried & could not speak for days when she died , openly cried when Arthur died . Henry viii was a greedy self indulgent mass murderer who killed two wives & nearly a third Parr . He exploited all the power his father had logistically worked so hard for . Ripped our country apart during the reformation, smashed abbeys , lied about pardoning the ppl who rallied against the demolition of there abbeys & was even aggressive with Jane Seymour when she had concern for the destruction.

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      @@388Caroline or Caligula

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      Though H vii treated Catherine of Aragon appallingly, leaving her in a politically trap taking her dowry after Arthur died . I’m not a fan of any monarch. We need a republic here in England

  • @debrawilson4837
    @debrawilson4837 4 роки тому +1

    I like the crazy uncle and his half baked schemes.

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому +2

    Parliament
    The nobility had already seen that loyalty to Henry would be rewarded by placing them in local government. Thus, Henry VII found it easy to exert his power over the House of Lords, which was made up of senior clergy and peers. Henry VII's leverage over the House of Lords, the most powerful body in parliament, helped him consolidate his power.
    The House of Commons was primarily comprised of rich merchants and lawyers and had begun to gain a lot of power by the time Henry became King. Henry VI recognised the body's significance to England's economic growth, and this understanding greatly helped Henry VII's economy.

  • @CommonSwindler
    @CommonSwindler 6 років тому +4

    This is what you get for trusting your astrology to Rasputin.

  • @seltaeb9691
    @seltaeb9691 Рік тому +1

    Similar quality BBC 70s period dramas here on UA-cam is 'The Devil's Crown' & the civil war (British!) 'By the Sword Divided', both highly recommended.

  • @briandelaney9710
    @briandelaney9710 6 років тому +1

    What a ray of sunshine Sir John is ;)

  • @AncaXBre
    @AncaXBre 2 роки тому +1

    46:26 That face XD Of course everything, good sir, the next generations need to laugh too.

  • @AnamCaraDeMexico
    @AnamCaraDeMexico 2 роки тому +3

    Carry On Warbeck? How to model the YORKSHIRE "reversible "

  • @Timelord2001
    @Timelord2001 4 роки тому +4

    I'm trying to understand why exactly 3 episodes of this series, numbers 9, 10, and 11, are blocked because of "copyright" reasons, when we can see the first 8 and the last 2 just fine. It's from 1971; who still needs to monetize it at all? But especially just those 3 episodes? Seems absurd to me.

  • @tnecklover
    @tnecklover 11 років тому +1

    Bernardo reminds me a bit of Monty Python's Eric Idle!

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому +1

    The Warbeck Rebellion was Henry VII's second rebellion to deal with after the Lambert Simnel Rebellion of 1486-87. The rebellion led by Perkin Warbeck was a long drawn out affair and lasted between 1491 and 1499.

  • @d.s.archer5903
    @d.s.archer5903 4 роки тому

    9:45 Ah, always good to see Peter Bowles! He was memorable as Marshal Murat in the mini-series “Napoleon and Love” (1974).

    • @racheldemain1940
      @racheldemain1940 4 роки тому

      Is he in the first few minutes?

    • @d.s.archer5903
      @d.s.archer5903 4 роки тому

      @@racheldemain1940 No; Peter Bowles appears throughout this episode of "The Shadow of the Tower."

  • @morbius109
    @morbius109 7 років тому +5

    I'm sure the poison conspiracy existed, but history seems sorely limited with regard to Sir John Kendal, Archdeacon Hussey, or Sir John Tonge...I wish there were more information. I'd love to research the whole series of events more thoroughly.

    • @TellEmB290
      @TellEmB290 4 роки тому +2

      This is all I can find: erenow.net/postclassical/the-last-white-rose-the-secret-wars-of-the-tudors/12.php

  • @thechatteringmagpie
    @thechatteringmagpie 7 років тому +1

    I love this episode.

  • @eric8535
    @eric8535 Рік тому

    The Borgias were a crazy bunch. They talked of getting rid of their enemies over dinner.

  • @JamesTilsley1
    @JamesTilsley1 6 років тому +3

    Rasputin!

  • @billb2479
    @billb2479 10 років тому +4

    This episode was comedic. Apparently a break to the other "heavier" episodes. Kind of like "The Trouble with Tribbles" on Star Trek TOS.

  • @samanthathompson9812
    @samanthathompson9812 Рік тому

    "It's beginning to form a peak." It's like this episode was written by a different writer than the others. Like an episode of Blackadder.

  • @jostd48
    @jostd48 4 роки тому +1

    This series is fantastic. Thank you for posting it. Anyone notice the two people at 10:43 are about to break character? :)

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      I remember the actor who in I Claudius ironically talking about poison

  • @orpheus9037
    @orpheus9037 8 років тому +1

    Given the comic, almost loony premise, this episode is a bit ponderous in how it unfolds

  • @freedomtosayno7880
    @freedomtosayno7880 7 років тому +1

    Toledo, not Madrid was the capital or court center at this time in Spanish history.

  • @diane01271986
    @diane01271986 11 років тому +1

    Love this

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

    Richard iii wasn’t the tyrant that Shakespeare was commissioned to write . Shakespeare was commissioned by Elizabeth 1st Tudor, therefore out of his brilliance he created propaganda against Richard iii which stuck up to when he was recently discovered, to not be a hunch back etc or Machiavellian. The war of the roses was a surprise that Henry Tudor won in battle & thanks to Stanley’s army he was triumphant. Yet Henry Tudor was a skilled politician getting the balance of state & church from the start

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg 5 місяців тому

    Surprised they didn’t see them as alchemist , and saw that as dark and related to the occult Yeah, they were intellectually ahead because it was the case of understanding what happens via the stars Their interpretation have been through the planets, planetary all movements, the stars

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg 5 місяців тому

    “ the uncle “ wants war & brilliantly says what’s the church coming to buy not being at war “ younger generation are the worst of times , how every generation says this ‘ the Pope was peaceful with the Turks for trade . Wouldn’t need to the hypocrisy of the church church man, how they wanted constant warfare when they’re meant to think of turning the other cheek Blessed are the peacemakers . Peace was kept also for trade reasons, but it was hilarious. The way that you kept wanting war “

  • @chibuzorokonkwo7039
    @chibuzorokonkwo7039 Рік тому

    Omg!!!! This part of this series is actually true. I had to do a little research. I can’t believe such stupidity actually happened. It’s so funny😂🤣😂🤣😂

  • @BaronMichaelDeBlone1066
    @BaronMichaelDeBlone1066 Рік тому

    It isn't so much astrology itself that is the problem, rather the ways in which some misguided fools interpret/use it. The briefest link made with the Kabbalah, somewhat over 'shadowed' (sorry couldn't resist) by the relative humour in this episode is interesting considering the constant virtue signalling from the bbc these days.
    I enjoyed it very much overall. Peter Bowles was a bit of a (welcome) surprise but his French accent is a little flaky here although it probably is the main ingredient keeping this on such a light level. Killing a king is a very serious matter though so I can also appreciate how some comments show disapproval. It is certainly a departure from what went before. I am intrigued to see how the remainder of this series plays out. Thanks again.

  • @aliciaisnumberone69
    @aliciaisnumberone69 7 років тому

    the man playing the bushop is mr woodhouse in the bbc emma made around this time

  • @susanadler5195
    @susanadler5195 Рік тому

    this is hilarious

  • @M1710100
    @M1710100 10 років тому +1

    HILLARIOUS!!!! :)))))

  • @melisarodriguez6783
    @melisarodriguez6783 Рік тому +1

    The Turk 😂😂😁😁😱😱

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

    During Henry VII's rule, the relationship between the Church and the State was Erastian. This meant that the state had supremacy over the church.

  • @darkearl1
    @darkearl1 11 років тому

    "Forgiving"? Try telling that to Warwick & Warbeck. As for HVIII, the sins of the son are visited on the father.

  • @stardaddyo9
    @stardaddyo9 4 роки тому +1

    It will be expensive and it will take some time.

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

    This was a opportunity for the females around the thrown to be more represented

  • @ptrckcmrfrd
    @ptrckcmrfrd 9 років тому +4

    Ah ha!! So this is why they indicated at the end of the White Queen that one of the twins was replaced with a lookalike and taken over the channel to Flanders, etc. My question is how much proof is there that this is what occurred or is this just more historical Inaccuracy on the part of the creators of that series....

    • @Salamon2
      @Salamon2 9 років тому +4

      Patrick Comerford We will never know for certain, but the likelihood that one of those boys survived while the other didn't is extremely low.

    • @TheKeyser94
      @TheKeyser94 8 років тому +6

      +Patrick Comerford Thay may bullshit, because you cant trust what Phillipa "I don't known nothing about history" Gregory make, hell, she is the only person in England that believe that Anne Boleyn was really guilty of her charges, believe that Henry VII was a rapist and Elizabeth I was a psychopath.

    • @JamesCourse66
      @JamesCourse66 8 років тому +2

      +TheKeyser94 Suspecting Henry VII of that is not completely implausible and to be honest almost any medieval ruler could be considered a psychopath by our standards though I did not feel Gregory was stating Elizabeth was a psychopath whatsoever. I did strongly disagree with how submissive she painted Elizabeth the I. She didn't even show us the infamous rages she would fly into- she was always just saying how she was unsure of everything and couldn't refuse any of Robert's wishes (bullshit to me).

    • @JamesCourse66
      @JamesCourse66 8 років тому

      +Patrick Comerford A few years ago the "heart of the prince", which has famously been said to be the heart of one of Elizabeth's brothers, was genetically tested. Turns out it WAS the heart of a prince. So the case is more or less closed; the ancient rumours about the twins being mutilated and killed then hidden away appears to be true. The jailers don't just let one go while torturing and disemboweling the other.

    • @Salamon2
      @Salamon2 8 років тому

      James Repstock
      Curious about this. Do you have a link to an article or something similar?

  • @Albukhshi
    @Albukhshi 8 років тому +1

    @ 9:44
    If you're a clue, I can see now how my ancestors drove the military orders out of the holy land...

    • @Albukhshi
      @Albukhshi 8 років тому

      HappyandAtheist
      Wow, you ruined a perfectly good joke.
      See, this is the kind of audience I get on YT: no sense of comedy.
      did you REALLY think I was serious, or are you trolling?
      For the record though:
      1-Who cares? I could say that about the Byzantines who occupied the city prior to 637. Frankly, I grow tired of Jews, Muslims, and Christians fighting each other over a piece of semi-desert, All because the Romans kicked the Jews out of that place. How about all three just share the place and get it over with, instead of calling each other thieves?
      3-What made you think I'm a Muslim? If I am, then I'm hardly bothered, since last I heard religions are not physical entities.

    • @lalaland956
      @lalaland956 8 років тому +3

      +Albukhshi you make a great point. I wish these 3 religions would stop fighting each other and just get along. you can have respect for one another while disagreeing.

  • @MissusTudor
    @MissusTudor 11 років тому

    Er, who did he murder, exactly? All Kings had to sign death warrants, but it wasn't murder. Were they all haunted, or is haunting reserved for Henry VII? If I were you, I'd get a feel for the era before making moral judgements.
    As for cowardly, he fought for his crown three times. And won. He was almost killed during the first military engagement. There's cowardly, right there. Murdering two children to seize the crown, now that IS cowardly.

  • @williambuchan4778
    @williambuchan4778 6 років тому +3

    That episode should have never of happened. I expected Sid James & Kenneth Williams to walk on! What were they thinking of. Still if Shakespeare can do light comedy...

    • @TellEmB290
      @TellEmB290 4 роки тому +5

      Unbelievably, this seems to have actually happened. Bernart de Vignolles' deposition is a historical document.

  • @LynxSouth
    @LynxSouth 8 років тому +2

    Although I enjoyed this episode, it makes far too light of the ancient Levantine and Mediterranean expertise with even the subtlest poisons and their rather common use. I think a few millenia of history, including the present, would have to be rewritten, were we to know the full extent of the use of poisons.

  • @xanderxine
    @xanderxine 7 років тому +1

    27:50 - 30:25 thats the Major from Fawlty Towers

    • @williambuchan4778
      @williambuchan4778 6 років тому

      xanderxine. Sorry, its not the Major, similiar, but if you Google Fawlty you will see. This old coot was in another comedy but cant drag it up, hmmm possibly something like Hi De Hi or the French Resistance comedy. Cant rmbr the title of that now! Its bugging me! Right, he played the part of a waiter & he shuffled on & off with a white napkin thing on his arm, doing the sniffing twitching thing with his face. Ok, Allo Allo is the series & I think thats where he was. Right I will Google it...No, its not Allo Allo.. Hmmm.. Right, I am back with this Edit, ref your wrong Major from Fawlty Tours role. Ive just got his role & tv series he was playing in the 1970s, took 24hrs for my brain cells to regurgitate it! Ok... THE DUCHESS OF DUKE STREET!! He was the waiter, hence my image above mentioned. It wasnt a comedy, but a period drama that had its comedic moments. Over & out!

    • @Lytton333
      @Lytton333 6 років тому

      It is the Major. . AKA Ballard Berkeley. See the cast list at the end

    • @williambuchan4778
      @williambuchan4778 6 років тому

      Lytton333 maybe we are at x purposes here. The fella I am on about is at the very start 2.13 after the wench stealing the groats after her wenching. Peter Bowles is the other actor. Anyway my guy is not Busby but the waiter out of Duchess of Duke Street. I cant go thru the complete ep again to find Busby. Give me his time slot for yours. :-)

    • @williambuchan4778
      @williambuchan4778 6 років тому

      Lytton333 ah u hav gave it. Pse wait.

    • @williambuchan4778
      @williambuchan4778 6 років тому

      xanderxine yup u are rite, tho my guy is with him so I will take a point! Too old grand coots. Didnt see Busby at first, tho my guy is waiter Duch. of Duke St. Bet they had some tales to tell in their teabreak!

  • @Jelperman
    @Jelperman 9 років тому

    Is that a turkey on the dinner table?

  • @tnecklover
    @tnecklover 11 років тому

    Several of the episodes of this series merely appear to have been added to fill up space.

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

    All this determination to oust Henry Tudor when Edward IV had several illegitimate children by different women and in 1483 all his seven surviving children with Queen Elizabeth (née Woodville) were declared illegitimate. This led to the coronation of his brother Richard III in place of his son Edward V.

    • @marcokite
      @marcokite 3 місяці тому +1

      They were all illegitimate as Edward IV and the king's grey mare were not legally married

  • @WoodlandWayfarer
    @WoodlandWayfarer 7 років тому

    What does young Sir John say at 12:15

    • @WoodlandWayfarer
      @WoodlandWayfarer 7 років тому

      Ah! Thanks, that's why his Uncle was surprised haha

  • @AmethystEyes
    @AmethystEyes 11 років тому

    you mean like filler episodes?

  • @raceching
    @raceching 11 років тому

    He was.coward. Albeit, a very clever one for the time....the only reason he survived. There was no constitutional right to the throne. He died a bumbling old man....haunted by those he had murdered.

  • @Lytton333
    @Lytton333 11 років тому +1

    An odd episode this one.. a strange brew of whimsy and cynicism.

  • @michaeltowslee4111
    @michaeltowslee4111 5 місяців тому

    The mediocrity of Henry's enemies in this episode is unreal. They could hardly elicit more than a sad laugh from Henry and Morton.

  • @jamesi1065
    @jamesi1065 8 років тому +3

    this episode could have been better handled

    • @whitney1348
      @whitney1348 Рік тому

      I like when Henry says to Morton “ who is that odd looking man”… then “ him “😂

  • @SilentAssassin927
    @SilentAssassin927 Рік тому

    Please tell me this was not actually a plan to kill the king. This is like a damn Monty Python episode.

    • @EM-lz9kg
      @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

      It was real , Henry Tudor had a astrologer in his entourage so they did think that astrology would kill kings

    • @chibuzorokonkwo7039
      @chibuzorokonkwo7039 Рік тому

      Google says it really did happen. Believe me, I’m as shocked as you are.

    • @marcokite
      @marcokite 3 місяці тому +1

      It's all totally true and well researched - you couldn't make it up

  • @schimmelfennig1863
    @schimmelfennig1863 8 років тому

    wench!

  • @EM-lz9kg
    @EM-lz9kg Рік тому

    The vile attack on the Jewish community during this time remembering the Spanish Inquisition was happening. Jewish ppl could not openly practice under Henry Tudor & we’re used economically, Henry 11 expulsion was appalling

  • @lowspark68
    @lowspark68 4 роки тому

    Astrologers don't prepare potions. This person is an alchemist. Poorly written episode.

  • @passies531
    @passies531 10 років тому

    This one is written by someone else surely? What terrible acting too. Have enjoyed the others so far.